View allAll Photos Tagged Films
Eleven Madison Park - Beet: with Horseradish and Herbs - Medium Format Film
11 Madison Ave, New York, NY photographed 09/21/2021 by Daniel Krieger for The New York Times.
Camera - Hasselblad 503CW. Lens - Carl Zeiss Distagon 60mm F/3.5 CB. Film - Kodak Porta 400. The color negative was digitized by Fujifilm GFX 100S with the same Carl Zeiss lens mounted via FotodioX Hasselblad V Lens to FUJIFILM G-Mount adapter and Fujifilm MCEX-18G WR macro extension tube.
Nikon F6, Kodak T-Max 400, Nikkor AF-S 50/1.8G @ f/3.5, 1/15
Die lauteste und längste Straße die ich kennengelernt habe.
My "nearly perfect" film gear:
- Canon F1 New Edition Limitée Los Angeles O. Games, 1984, which I love for almost everything.
-Voigtlander folding camera Bessa III 667, which I love for its portability, beautiful true colors with Heliar 80mm f3.5 and its nice smooth bokeh, amazingly bright viewfinder, Rolls Royce shutter sound (so silent you just wonder if you took the photo). The rangefinder is not so good, though.
- the beautiful grey Rollei T Tessar, which I love for its size and shape, the magnificent, almost 3D-like Maxwell focusing screen, the velvety touch of the Tessar (I have to try it in B&W, I have the feeling it must be a gem) and all the things I don't know yet about the Rolleiflex, which is a world in itself, more elusive than the Bessa.
Film has definitely captured my heart, I'm afraid.
Website // (inactive) Instagram
Just because I'm actually fed up and I've had enough of it:
I'm not interested in receiving any of your dick pics. Not at all interested. I don't care if you post them on your flickr and then send me links to them or if you send a picture of your private parts to me in a direct message. This shit is - at least in Germany - an offence punishable by law.
No photograph on here, even if it's a semi-nude, invites unsolicited imagery of your private parts. I did take a lot of photographs that were semi-nudes (where the maximum you'd see was a part of a side-boob) when I was younger and I'm in the process of deleting some of them from this platform. I took them back then because of issues I had with my body image and not to be sexualized. You sexualizing me says a lot about you and at least to me, flickr is not a fetish/sex platform.
I received hate from women for semi-nudes, too, which I also found quite hurtful, especially because I never post more than what you'd see by the beach (the non-nude parts of it).
Please note that I've met a lot of wonderful humans on here that have done none of the above but I've just about had enough of some people on here behaving in an absolutely inappropriate manner who sometimes proceed to stalking me.
A snippet from a poem written by Diane Wakoski.
Ruined polaroid film.
Main blog
Sideblogs
Sort of what I've been doing for a while here.
Sick of social media, so I've slowed it to a large degree. I don't want to post much beyond snapshots there because they have to mean something to someone or they don't count, at least that's the culture of IG. When I do share film, which generally is more rooted in an artistic expression, the images aren't well received. And what should I expect anyhow from IGers at large?
Aware of the pitfalls of letting those feelings dictate what I do, I've still taken two steps back as a precaution. For me that's slowing the pace and diminishing the quality of what I post so I don't feel the way I have been about the dynamic that exists there. Oh, and how that will hurt my "brand"!! Ugh, really? If we can't somehow monetize what we do as artists, are we trees falling in the woods?
I have always loved slide film, especially medium format E6. A little over a year ago I had a little show at my favorite little coffee shop in downtown Portland and while I did have prints up to share with the regular customers, I mostly didn't care about those after my opening night. That was because at the slide show that I presented there was a feeling that not only was I present, but so was everyone in the room. There was a story with most images, and a narrative shared among them. The images looked like you could walk into them. Like you were there. For sharing my work, it was the polar opposite of the typical method today seems to be: someone "engaged" in conversation with others, quickly scrolling past 2" images on their phone, liking, liking, liking.
My point is that I have not only been shooting, and mostly on slide film, but I haven't been willing to even scan the film I have processed to share with anyone because I feel the medium is both being disrespected and cannot adequately convey what my P66 or even print can. Hell, flickr is even still the much better place.
So, while I wait to pivot to whatever fills the void, I can't help but only want to be back in a room with my people who are present, soaking in the glow of images that will be just a memory when the lights came back on. And it that's exactly how I would feel had I been there at each instance without a shutter to open–just a memory. And that's all I need.
Maybe I'll find a way to being in LA. But not having the connection I do to a place and not having an outlet like I used to at the moment is leaving a lot of film piling up, waiting for to find the light in a dark room.
A large crew and cast of extras, together with horses and carriages assembled in Darnaway Street/Moray Place in Edinburgh's New Town on 14th July 2022 as part of the production of "The Debutante", a TV drama set in 1890s New York. The show is based on Edith Wharton’s final and unfinished novel "The Buccaneers",
The untitled series has been temporarily dubbed ‘Debutante’ - by recent accounts it may end up being titled "The Buccaneers"