View allAll Photos Tagged Evolution
Funny Images : Take a Loook This "Evolution of Man Image"...Is this a evolution concept from Darwin's Theory ????.....
SHARE THIS PICTURE TO YOUR ALL FRIENDS,...
See another funny images and videos here : www.funnyimages3.co.cc
Apresentação da Orquestra Filarmônica de São Bernardo do Campo e Coral Contabilis, na regência do maestro Carlos Moreno e da banda The Evolution, em São Bernardo, SP, dia 21 de dezembro de 2008.
This outfit evolved during the day, as I set off wearing a different skirt and scarf, but couldn't resist changing into the items I bought at the fair!
Scarf, skirt and ring - "All Things Vintage and Festive" fair at local hotel (I think they are all more festive than vintage though!)
Jumper - Pomodoro/charity shop
Boots - Markon/charity shop
Bag - Edina Ronay
Outdoor version in comments.
Direct Rail Services Class 68 no 68001 "Evolution",first member of the class leads the 1820 Aberdeen Craiginches-Grangemouth DRS service out of Craiginches Yard.
An order for 7 more members of the class was recently confirmed, their should be 32 in all soon enough.
Photo taken July 2015.
Seen on México Federal Highway 2 in San Luis Rio Colorado, Sonora
(Across the street from a gas station where I did not get stuck in the sand.)
20091109_0141a1_800x600
►metalpar evolution IV
► Placa Patente: FX.RR.92
► Tipo de Servicio: linea 107 -108 antofagasta
► Numero Orden Interno: .-
► Fecha toma de fotografía: 16-enero-2014
THE SIMPSONS: Flanders calls Homer an ape and makes a case for evolution revolution in THE SIMPSONS episode "The Monkey Suit" airing Sunday, May 14 (8:00-8:30 PM ET/PT) on FOX. THE SIMPSONS™ & ©2006TCFFC ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ©2006FOX BROADCASTING CR:FOX
On the wall in the Darwin Cafe, Darwin Building, KB. Now I'm wondering where I would be on this evolutionary scale; either 1 extra step to the right or more likely 10 steps behind the chimp :-)
The evolution of New Gotham.
First built in 2008 the city at that time contained a City Hall (beige building on left) and a modernist skyscraper. Flanked by the Twin Towers it also had an elevated railway, working traffic lights and a cable car. The cable car was removed later that year and a monorail added along with the Chrysler Building Spire (thanks to Sean Kenney and Spencer Rezkella for their respective designs).
In 2011 the Twin Towers were removed and the city took on a more cluttered appearance. The monorail came back as did a subway.
By 2014 the towers were back along with some of the Lego official modular sets. In 2015 a few custom structures took centre stage.
In 2016 the city was at its largest. The Twin Towers were the focal point of the skyline but the real impact was the cluster of art deco inspired buildings (my own personal favourite being the blue). The city was divided into two districts; Downtown and Midtown. Downtown was home to the micro scale skyscrapers. Midtown - the official minifig scale sets.
This version of the city was taken apart in early 2017 and the project was shelved. In July 2017 the city underwent some rebuilding. The Twin Towers were replaced with a single modernist skyscraper and the city moved from mostly microscale to minifig. The blue art deco building was also increased in height and the Chrysler Building took centre stage. An elevated railway sat in the middle of the city, as it did in 2008 and there were plans to build more by the river.
By December 2018 the city had changed again. Whilst the skyline looked more impressive with the addition of the South Tower there were fewer buildings overall. All of the buildings by the river (along with the river itself) were removed. Plans for 2019 include rebuilding the river and a better road system along with more custom buildings.
It's been awhile since I've posted a compiled update but lots has been happening, will probably miss some stuff! New manilla rope donated by Terry (one of our student parents), two ~10lb medicine balls made (fun!), first run of test shirts in (what do you think?), sandbags!, improved balance beam a ......http://blog.parkourvisions.org/compiled-new-changes-to-the-gym-1 Posted via web from Parkour Visions miniBlog
R-Evolution
Marco Cochrane
Constructed of steel rod and balls and covered in stainless steel mesh, with LED lighting effects, R-Evolution is a 48 foot tall sculpture of a woman, Deja Solis, standing firmly with both feet on the ground, eyes closed, arms open at her sides, palms forward, a peaceful expression- present.
The culmination of The Bliss Project, a series of three monumental sculptures of a woman, Deja Solis, expressing her humanity, R-Evolution like Bliss Dance and Truth is Beauty, is intended to demand a change in perspective… to be a catalyst for social change. She is intended to challenge the viewer to see past the sexual charge that has developed around the female body which has been used for power and control, to the human being. We hope to inspire men and women to take action to end violence against women, making room for women’s voices, thus allowing both women and men to live fully and thrive.
The Bass Rock ,North Berwick, Scotland .
I love the way how all the elements compliment each other thus creating a compelling narrative . Looking from left to right the photo is creating a story from our deep and dark past into our future with the sightseeing boat and wind turbines signifying modernity .
I'm posing with a giant legume pod from southeast Asia. It's no surprise that this pod looks so much like a pea pod. They both come from the same family (Leguminosae) and have similar (homologous) structures. A homologous structure we are all familiar with is backbones in vertebrate animals. Homologous features indicate that certain organisms share a common ancestor. Humans and other vertebrates evolved from a common vertebrate ancestor and legumes evolved from a common pod-forming ancestor.
Please join me in my blog “Botany Without Borders: Where Design Meets Science”
botanywithoutborders.blogspot.com/
Plant homology is not always as obvious as the giant bean pod I'm holding here.
This picture reminds me of a question involving our built environments. Do they have to be big to be successful? Can we get the job done by designing something smaller? I think it's worth considering how we can conserve space and other resources by designing smaller, more effective built environments.
For more scientific literature on legumes see:
Isely, D. 1982. Leguminosae and Homo sapiens. Economic Botany 36: 46-70.
L'idea di questo quadro nasce lo scorso anno durante il corso sul sito Voilà di Christine Dumont. Doveva essere il mio progetto finale al posto della collana "Soul colors" presentata. Essendo un progetto ambizioso e con non pochi problemi di realizzazione ho dovuto rinunciare per questione di tempi, ma non ho mai rinunciato al progetto. Per questo, anche se lo presento nel 2014 si chiama "Evolution 2013". Misura 40x30 cm.
The idea for this panel was born last year during the Christine Dumont course on Voilà site. It was to be my final project instead of the necklace "Soul colors" presented. Being an ambitious project with many problems of realization I had to give up for a matter of time, but I never gave up on the project. For this reason, even if I share it in 2014, is called "Evolution 2013." Measure 16x12 inch approximately.
Why must God exist?
There are only 2 basic options for the origin of the universe .... an uncaused, supernatural first cause of the universe OR an uncaused, natural first cause of the universe. If you categorically reject the former (as atheists do), you have no option but to accept the latter by default. It is an intellectually dishonest cop-out to say atheism is merely a lack of belief.
Atheists cannot simply deny and attack the concept of a supernatural first cause without justifying the only alternative. That is not intellectually credible or rational.
Firstly ...
We know that the universe has not always existed, we know it had a beginning and it is 'running down' from an original peak of energy potential at its beginning. The Second Law of Thermodynamics (law of entropy) confirms that. So we know the universe had an origin.
Secondly .....
What about matter itself?
Can matter have always existed? The simple answer is no.
Matter/energy and all natural entities and events are contingent, they rely on causes for everything. Because they are contingent they cannot be eternally self-existent or necessary entities. They do not contain within themselves the reason or cause of their own existence. As contingent entities, they are entirely reliant on that which causes and maintains them. They cannot exist or operate in any way without causes, Thus they must have had an original cause at some stage, even if the chain of causes and effect is very long, it had to have a beginning at some point.
A basic principle of the scientific method is that we can expect to find an adequate cause for every natural occurrence. Scientific research is based on that premise.
Thirdly ....
A supernatural first cause (God) is not a contingent entity. It is not natural, and is not bound by natural laws which govern matter and all natural events. In fact, as the first cause of matter/energy, it is also the author of the laws that govern matter/energy. It cannot be subject to laws it has created.
As the very first cause, it also cannot have had any preceding cause, so we know it cannot be a contingent entity.
Why? Because ...first means first, not second or third. If something is first, nothing preceded it. It must have always existed and must have had within itself the means of its own existence. It could not have relied on anything else for its existence. So the supernatural, first cause (a creator God) has to be eternally, self-existent and necessary.
It also has to have the powers and ability to create everything else that exists in the universe. As the original cause, it has to be an adequate cause of everything ...of all causes and effects that follow it, forever. That means - it has to have the powers, properties and qualities sufficient to create: time, matter/energy, natural laws, information, life, intelligence, consciousness and every characteristic that humans have. Because we, as a mere effect of the first cause, cannot be greater than that which ultimately caused us.
So God is the non-contingent, self-existent, necessary, supernatural, first cause of everything in the universe.
That is the logical conclusion of the understanding and application of natural laws.
ATHEIST BELIEF IN A NATURAL FIRST CAUSE VIOLATES NATURAL LAW.
THUS ATHEISM IS ILLOGICAL, AND ANTI-SCIENCE.
Essential characteristics of the first cause.
Consider this short chain of causes and effects:
A causes B, - B causes C, - C causes D, - D causes E.
'A, B, C & D' are all causes and may all look similar, but they are not, there is an enormous and crucial difference between them.
Causes B, C & D are fundamentally different from cause A.
Why?
Because A is the very first cause and thus had no previous cause. It exists without a cause. It doesn’t rely on anything else for its existence, it is completely independent of causes - while B, C & D would not exist without A. They are entirely dependent on A.
Causes; B, C & D are also effects, whereas A is not an effect, only a cause.
So we can say that the first cause ‘A’ is both self-existent and necessary. It is necessary because the rest of the chain of causes and effects could not exist without it. We also have to say that the subsequent causes and effects B, C, D and E are all contingent. That is; they are not self-existent they all depend entirely on other causes to exist.
We can also say that A is eternally self-existent, i.e. it has always existed, it had no beginning. Why? Because if A came into being at some point, there must have been something other than itself that brought it into being … which would mean A was not the first cause (A could not create A) … the something that brought A into being would be the first cause. In which case, A would be contingent and no different from B, C, D & E.
We can also say that A is adequate to produce all the properties of B, C, D & E.
Why?
Well in the case of E we can see that it relies entirely on D for its existence, E can in no way be superior to D because D had to contain within it everything necessary to produce E. The same applies to D it cannot be superior to C, but furthermore neither E or D can be superior to C, because both rely on C for their existence, and C had to contain everything necessary to produce D & E.
Likewise with B, which is responsible for the existence of C, D & E.
As they all depend on A for their existence and all their properties, abilities and potentials, none can be superior to A whether singly or combined. A had to contain everything necessary to produce B, C, D & E including all their properties, abilities and potentials.
Thus we deduce that; nothing in the universe can be superior in any way to the very first cause of the universe, because the whole universe, and all material things that exist, depend entirely on the abilities and properties of the first cause to produce them.
So to sum up … a first cause must be uncaused, must have always existed and cannot be in any way inferior to all subsequent causes and effects. In other words, the first cause of the universe must be eternally, self-existent and omnipotent (greater than everything that exists). No natural entity can have those attributes, that is why a Supernatural, Creator God MUST exist.
FOUNDATIONS OF SCIENCE
The Law of Cause and Effect. Dominant Principle of Classical Physics. David L. Bergman and Glen C. Collins
www.thewarfareismental.net/b/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/b...
"The Big Bang's Failed Predictions and Failures to Predict: (Updated Aug 3, 2017.) As documented below, trust in the big bang's predictive ability has been misplaced when compared to the actual astronomical observations that were made, in large part, in hopes of affirming the theory."