.

m:I:!m!J Expose the JNU Administration's Devious Game Plan To Demean JNUSU!Defeat The Dubious Mileage-Seeking By Various Student Organizations Who Are.

21 3.09 .

Dancing To The Tune Of The Administration!.

After dilly-dallying for two weeks, the JNU administration was Blatant lies and misreporting of facts has become ahabitfinally forced to revoke the draconian rustications on five students, with this current administration. During JNUSU's Dera Oalo.

' including three JNUSU office bearers. Ever since theorder for with-campaign, when the administration's insensitivity and lack ofdrawal of rustications was released, we have seen an avalanche .

concern for the 600 students who had not been provided hostel.

of false and misleading media statements by a devious adminis-facilities, and the repeated reneging of its own promises was.

tration r~garding the context of the revocation orders. thoroughly exposed, the administration resorted to brazenly issuinglaughable lies stating that only around 150 students were awaiting.

Our prolonged struggle against the JNU administration has.

repeatedly exposed the real anti-student character of the hostels!.

administration, and left it with absolutely no moral basis whatso-.

.

Unfortunately, some student organizations in this campus.

ever for the crackdown of Feb 25. The firm support of the JNU .

have made it a habit to ignore this devious game plan of the.

teaching community. as well as solidarity beyond the campus had administration, and always chosen to train their guns on.

further isolated the administration in this essentially undemocratic .

JNUSU instead. A recall of leaflets and campaign of these orga-.

and highhanded handling of legitimate student demands. When .

nizations from the very beginning of this protracted and critical.

forced by the democracy-loving JNU community to backtrack movement makes it evident that they were always interested in.

on this crackdown, the administration has indulged in a .

targeting the JNUSU at every JUncture. abusing and denigrating.

shameful face saving game, by politically demeaning the its leadership without any substance, thereby defocusing the move-.

JNUSU throuah concocted statements..

-ment. In their cold political calculations ofextracting organisational' We are issuing the text of the letter submitted by the JNUSU mileage, they hardly realise how much pleasure and benefit theyPresident to the committee that was formed to review the make available to the administration,which is waiting to use everyrustication orders. signal of division and cynicism in the student community. It is inter-.

The text of the JNUSU President's letter: esting (but not entirely unpredictable} that even the studentTo organisation which is part of the JNUSU council (SFI), and which.

The Chairperson. knew full well the content of the letter, has characteristically joinedRustication Review Committee, the bandwagon to bolster "doubts about contents of JNUSU's letter.With regard to the 25th Feb episode, which was un-JNUSU had issued the above mentioned letter to the com-fortunate, we reiterate our commitment to peaceful and demo-mittee (in consultation with JNUTA, which was also a source.

cratic forms of struggle. No inconvenience and disrup-of support in this struggle) taking full responsibility of thetion was mtended that day. We would like to stress that the movement that it has led, in a principled contrast to theessential concern of our recent agitation was to broaden the shoddy precedence ofan earlier rustication episode (duringsocial catchment area of the students, including poor students the workers' movement of 2007). In that episode, the organiza-.

in keeping with JNU's Act and tradition. We also reiterate our tion leading JNUSU (SFI) chose first to "disassociateDfrom thecomm1tment to sustain democratic culture and academic at-JNUSU-Ied movement when the crackdown happened. Then, theymosphere in the campus. demanded a Proctorial Enquiry against the students who were tar-Thanking you. geted by the administration. They went to the extent of claimingYours sincerely, that JNUSU leadership should not give "regret" letters, whileSandeep Singh "common students" should! It was a shocking creation ofPresident JNUSU hierarchy and division in the student community and a.

I .

8.3.09 The administration has, however, deliberately and shameful refusal to take responsibility of a JNUSU-Iedmischievously chosen to issue public statements which read movement. The then general secretary (presently JNUSUas follows: President). disagreed with such divisive and hierarchical schemes,and stood shoulder-to-shoulder with other students. At no point~All rustications have been revoked. Vice-Chancellor B.B. does the present JNUSU think that there should be any disasso-Bhattacharya has pardoned the students on the understand-ciatfon from the students. during the thick and thin of any move-ing that henceforth their agitation will be democratic and peace-.

ful ....the comm1ttee had received an apology letter from the ment. In the present context, JNUSU took full responsibility .

students · and issued the letter on behalf of the targeted students and.

the student community and did not leave anybody to fend-Statement issued by Chief Proctor H.B. Bohidar. for themselves as individuals who participated in aJNUSU-.

reported mthe Hindu. March 20 Ied movement. .

A simple comparison of JNUSU's letter with the Chief We appeal to all these organizations to desist fromProctor's media statement and or his revocation order shows that denigrating JNUSU, using the administration's dubious statementswords like "remorse", "apology", "pardon" attributed by the and posturings who are anyway hell-bent to demean JNUSU and.

JNU administration to JNUSU are nothing but their desperate the JNU student movement. We appeal to the studentface saving tactics and a calculated piece of mischief to community to reject the unfortunate politicking by thesedemean JNUSU. organizations to extract organizational mileage at every turnby continuously indulging in baseless accusations against.

It is indeed shocking that some ofthe student organisationshave chosen to use these administration's mischievous words to JNUSU. When the JNU administration is engaged in an elaboratefulfill administration's agenda.We have full confidence that the gameplan to commercialize this campus, disrupt every democraticforum, and assault the collective strength of JNUSU, such myopic.

JNU community has the clarity and honesty to appreciate '· .

.. .

this reality. acts and petty ambitions of these organizations are bound toweaken the striking ability of the student communitySandeep Shephalika Shcl~har Pall~l\ i OcknPresident, JNUSU Vic~-Prcsidem. JNUSU U~11.SL'cy.. JNUSU Mobcen Alam Jt. s~cv.. JNUSU.

.. .

' . .

...~.

. -, ·;·, .

.

Iii' .

'· .

.· .

._,..

' ' _... '"---'' ..... ;a...,,. . ----· .

-.......... :.io!'t= ._.._. ......... =----=----~ .

.

.

.

.!!.

.... .

a..

1 .

s Game Plan To n~... .

JNUSU .

Dubious Mileage-Seeking By_Various Student Organizations Who Are .

Dancing To The Tune Of The Administration!.

.

Blatant lies and misreporting of facts has become a habit .

21 .3.09 with this current administration. During JNUSU's Dera Dalo After dilly-dallying for two weeks. the JNU administration was campaign, when the administration's insensitivity and lack of .

finally forced to revoke the draconian rustications on five students, concern for the 600 students who had not been provided hostel .

including three JNUSU office bearers. Ever since theorder for with-facilities, and the repeated reneging of its own promises was .

drawal of rustications was released, we have seen an avalanche thoroughly exposed, the administration resorted to brazenly issuing .

of false and misleading media statements by a devious adminis-.

tration regarding the context of the revocation orders. laughable lies stating that only around 150 students were awaiting .

.

Our prolonged struggle against the JNU administration has hostels!.

Unfortunately, some student organizations in this campus .

repeatedly exposed the real ant1-student character of the have made it a habit to ignore this devious game plan of the .

administration, and left it with absolutely no moral basis whatso-administration, and always chosen to train their guns on .

ever for the crackdown of Feb 25. The firm support of the JNU JNUSU instead. A recall of leaflets and campaign of these orga-.

teachmg community. as well as solidarity beyond the campus had movement makes it evident that they were always interested in.

.

further isolated the administration in th1s essentially undemocratic nizations from the very beginning of this protracted and critical .

and highhanded handling of legitimate student demands. When targeting the JNUSU at every juncture, abusing and denigrating .

forced by the democracy-loving JNU community to backtrack its leadership without any substance,lhereby defocusing the move-.

on this crackdown, the administration has indulged in a ment. In their cold political calculations of extracting organisational .

shameful face saving game, by politically demeaning the .

JNUSU through concocted statements. mileage, they hardly realise how much pleasure and benefit they .

make available to the administration, which is waiting to use every .

We are issuing the text of the letter submitted by the JNUSU signal of division and cynicism in the student community. It is inter-.

President to the committee that was formed to review the esting (but not entirely unpredictable) that even the student .

rustication orders. organisation which is part of the JNUSU council (SFI), and which .

The text of the JNUSU President's letter: knew full well the content of the letter. has characteristically joined .

To the bandwagon to bolster "doubts" about contents of JNUSU's letter. The Chairperson, JNUSU had issued the above mentioned letter to the com-Rustication Review Committee, un-mittee (in consultation with JNUTA, which was also a source .

With regard to the 25lh Feb episode, which was of support in this struggle) taking full responsibility of the fortunate, we reiterate our commitment to peaceful and demo-movement that it has led, in a principled contrast to the.

disrup-.

cratic forms of struggle. No inconven1ence and .

shoddy precedence ofan earlier rustication episode (during .

the workers' movement of 2007). In that episode, the organiza..

tion was intended that day. We would like to stress that the .

essential concern of our recent agttation was to broaden the lion leading JNUSU (SFI) chose first to "disassociate~ from the .

soc1al catchment area of the students. includmg poor students JNUSU-Ied movement when the crackdown happened. Then, they .

in keeping with JNU's Act and tradit1on We also retterate our demanded a Proctorial Enquiry against the students who were tar-commitment to sustam democratic culture and academic at-geted by the admmistration. They went to the extent of claiming mosphere in the campus. that JNUSU leadership should not give "regret" letters, while Thanking you, "common students" should! It was a shocking creation of Yours· sincerely, .

hierarchy and division in the student community and a .

Sandeep Singh 8.3.09 shameful refusal to take responsibility of a JNUSU·Ied .

President, JNUSU movement. The then general secretary (presently JNUSU President). d1sagreed w1th such d1vis1ve and hierarchical schemes,.

The administration has, however, deliberately and mischievously chosen to issue public statements which read and stood shoulder-to-shoulder with other students. AI no point as follows: does the present JNUSU think that there should be any disasso-.

j "All rustications have been revoked. Vice-Chancellor 8.8. ciation from the students, during the thick and thin of any move-.

ment. In the present context, JNUSU took full responsibility Bhattacharya has pardoned the students on the understand-and issued the letter on behalf of the targeted students and.

I ing that henceforth their agitation will be democratic and peace-I ful ...the committee had received an apology letter from the the student community and did not leave anybody to fend .

for themselves as individuals who participated in a JNUSU-students.'" .

Ied movement.-Statement issued by Chief Proctor H.B. Bohidar, We appeal to all these organtzations to desist from reported in the Hindu, March 20 A simple comparison of JNUSU's feller with the Chief denigrating JNUSU, using theadministration's dubious statements Proctor's media statement and or his revocation order shows that and posturings who are anyway hell-bent to demean JNUSU and words like "remorse", "apology", "pardon" attributed by the the JNU student movement. We appeal to the student community to reject the unfortunate politicking by these JNU administration to JNUSUarenothing but their desperate organizations to extract organizational mileage at every turn .

face saving tactics and a calculated piece of mischief to by continuously indulging in baseless accusations against .

demean JNUSU. JNUSU. When the JNU administration is engaged in an elaborate .

It is indeed shocking that some of the student organisations gameplan to commercialize th1s campus. disrupt every democratic have chosen to use these administration's mischievous words to forum, and assault the collective strength of JNUSU, such myopic fulfill administration's agenda.We have full confidence that the acts and petty ambitions of these organizations are bound to .

JNU community has the clarity and honesty to appreciate weaken the striking ability of the student cornmuntty. .

this reality. Palla vi Dcka i\1ol>ccn Al~w Sandeep Shcphalika Shcldtar .ll. Sl!c)'.. JNUSU.

(il:n.St.:c) .. JNUSU .

f>re c; icknt. JNUSl l Y'lc~-Prcsidcn!, JNUSU .

I .

~ ·---.

.

.

_.

..._..............-'!"" .

.

,:: ,,f I] ;' ,, I ~·, . .

~. . : .

.,.; ..

.:1 .

,, .

;.

... .

·. .

'· .

-~~-------------------------------------------------------.

Expose the JNU Administration's Devious Game Plan To Demean JNUSU! .

Defeat The Dubious Mileage-Seeking By Various Student Organizations Who Are .

21.3 09 .

Dancing To The Tune Of The Administration! .

After dilly-dallying for two weeks, the JNU administration was Blatant lies and misreporting of facts has become a habit finally forced to revoke the draconian rustications on five students, with this current administration. During JNUSU's Dera Oalo including three JNUSU office bearers. Ever since the order for with-campaign, when the administration's insensitivity and lack of drawal of rustications was released, we have seen an avalanche concern for the 600 students who had not been provided hostel of false and misleading media statements by a devious adminis-facilities, and lhe repeated reneging of its own promises was tration regarding the context of the revocation orders. thoroughly exposed, the administration resorted to brazenly issuing laughable lies stating that only around 150 students were awaiting.

Our prolonged struggle against the JNU administration has .

hostels!.

repeatedly exposed the real anti-student character of the administration, and left it with absolutely no moral basis whatso-Unfortunately, some student organizations in this campus ever for the crackdown of Feb 25. The firm support of the JNU have made it a habit to ignore this devious game plan of the teaching community, as well as solidarity beyond the campus had administration, and always chosen to train their guns on.

' further isolated the administration in this essentially undemocratic JNUSU instead. A recall of leaflets and campaign of these orga-and highhanded handling of legitimate student demands. When nizations from the very beginning of this protracted and critical forced by the democracy-loving JNU community to backtrack movement makes it evident that they were always interested in on this crackdown, the administration has indulged in a targeting the JNUSU at every juncture, abusing and denigrating shameful face saving game, by politically demeaning the its leadership without any substance, thereby defocusing the move· JNUSU through concocted statements. ment. In their cold political calculations of extracting organisational .

mileage, they hardly realise how much pleasure and benefit they.

We are issuing the text of the letter submitted by the JNUSU make available to the administration, which is waiting to use everyPresident to the committee that was formed to review the signal of division and cynicism in the student community. It 1s inter-rustication orders. .

esting (but not entirely unpredictable) that even the student.

The text of the JNUSU President's letter: .

organisation which is part of the JNUSU council {SFI), and which.

To .

knew full well the content of the letter, has characteristically joined.

The Chairperson, .

the bandwagon to bolster "doubts" about contents of JNUSU's letter..

Rustication Review Committee, .

JNUSU had issued the above mentioned letter to the com-.

With regard to the 25th Feb episode, which was un-.

mittee (in consultation with JNUTA, which was also a source.

fortunate, we reiterate our commitment to peaceful and demo-.

of support in this struggle) taking full responsibility of the.

cratic forms of struggle. No inconvenience and disrup-.

movement that it has led, in a principled contrast to the.

tion was intended that day. We would like to stress that the .

shoddy precedence of an earlier rustication episode (during.

essential concern of our recent agitation was to broaden the .

the workers' movement of 2007). In that episode the organiza-.

social catchment area of the students, including poor students .

tion leading JNUSU (SFI) chose first to "disassociate~ from the.

in keepmg with JNU's Act and tradition. We also reiterate our .

JNUSU-Ied movement when the crackdown happened. Then, they.

commitment to sustain democratic culture and academic at-demanded a Proctorial Enquiry against the students who were tar-.

mosphere in the campus. .

geted by the administration. They went to the extent of claiming.

Thanking you. .

that JNUSU leadership should not give "regret" letters, while.

Yours' sincerely, .

"common students" should! It was a shocking creation of.

Sandeep Singh President, JNUSU 8.3.09 hierarchy and division in the student community and a shameful refusal to take responsibility of a JNUSU-Ied.

The administration has , however, deliberately and movement. The then general secretary (presently JNUSUmischievously chosen to issue public statements which read .

President), disagreed with such divisive and hierarchical schemes,.

as follows: and stood shoulder-to-shoulder with other students. At no point .

~All rustications have been revoked. Vice-Chancellor B.S. does the present JNUSU think that there should be any disasso-Bhattacharya has pardoned the students on the understand-ciation from the students, during the thick and thin of any move-ing that henceforth their agitation will be democratic and peace-ment. In the present context, JNUSU took full responsibility ful ....the committee had received an apology letter from the and issued the letter on behal.f of the targeted students and students: · -the student community and did not leave anybody to fend .

for themselves as individuals who participated in a JNUSU-.

-Statement issued by Chief Proctor H. B. Bohidar. .

Ied movement..

reported in the Hindu, March 20 .

We appeal to all these organizations to desist from.

A simple comparison of JNUSU's letter with t11e Chief denigrating JNUSU, using the administration's dubious statements.

Proctor's media statement and or his revocation order shows that .

and posturings who are anyway hell-bent to demean JNUSU and.

words like "remorse", "apology", "pardon" attributed by the the JNU student movement. We appeal to the student.

JNU administration to JNUSU are nothing but their desperate community to reject the unfortunate politicking by these.

face saving tactics and a calculated piece of mischief to organizations to extract organizational mileage at every turndemean JNUSU. .

by continuously indulging in baseless accusations againstIt is indeed shocking that some of the student organisations .

JNUSU. When the JNU administration is engaged in an elaborate .

have chosen to use these administration's mischievous words to .

gameplan to commercialize this campus. disrupt every democratic.

fulfill administration's agenda. We have full confidence that the forum, and assault the collective strength of JNUSU, such myopicJNU community has the clarity and honesty to appreciate acts and petty ambitions of these organizations are bound tothis reality. .

weaken the striking ability of the student community. Sa ndeep Shcpllalika Shcl.:har Pall<t\ i Dcka l\lobccn Alam Presid~tH. JNUSU Vicc-Pr~sident. JNUSU G~n.Sec;.. JNUSU .

Jt. Se~).. JNUSU .

I .

II; .

....--........... .._, .

.

,~ .

.<' .

.