View allAll Photos Tagged Breakup
ARE YOU SHY? INSECURE? DONT BELIEVE IN LOVE CAUSED BY A BAD BREAKUP?
MILLIONS OF PEOPLE ARE AFRAID OF MEETING NEW PEOPLE DUE TO LACK OF COMMUNICATION, SELF APPEREANCE, AND FEAR.
DONT LET THAT STOP YOU. DISCOVER THE SECRETS BEHIND REAL LOVE. THIS WILL GIVE YOU MORE CONFIDENCE IN YOURSELF AND WILL CHANGE YOUR LIFE FOREVER!!
CLICK BELOW TO FIND OUT MORE
Shards of ice on the beach at Lake Clark as spring creeps in at the end of winter
Credit: NPS /D. Young. 2015
After knocking over a glass table and breaking it, I decided it might be useful for a photo someday, so I kept most of the big pieces (but stupidly, only two of the three legs). I thought of a rough concept pretty soon after that, but as I tend to do every now and then, chose to put it aside just for a short, little while...
So... after about six months of having heavy, jagged shards of broken glass sitting around my apartment (and a couple of incidents requiring bandages), I finally did something with them. In the time that had past I'd also broken three drinking glasses and, naturally, saved them as well (Yes, actually I AM a klutz). So here is the result:
It took a while to arrange a time with Stacia (the model), and twice we had it scheduled but plans fell through (once because of a friend's pregnancy). When the schedule was finally worked out, I had to move several pieces of furniture out into my hallway to get the setting I wanted, as the room is small (a LOT smaller than in looks). Unfortunately the hallway isn't exactly giant, and the furniture basically barricaded the front door, trapping Stacia inside my apartment with me, surrounded by sharp slabs of glass and a hammer. Of course, she had brought her own gun to our previous photoshoot, so I suspect she wasn't too worried:)
The lighting set-up included one monobloc in a softbox high and about 45 degrees camera-right, pointing down at her face. I had another monobloc in a softbox right next to me camera-left a bit lower, bouncing light off the wall (both for fill light on Stacia and to try and get some depth in the objects on the floor). I put two speedlites in the window (one clamped to the handle) with CTO gels, using the curtain as a partial diffuser, to get the shadow pattern on the wall and ceiling. I also had on-axis fill coming from a speedlight stuck in an Orbis ring flash. The flashes were all triggered with Radiopoppers.
I did a lot of post-work to get the look of this shot the way I wanted (surreal), which, on its own, is already quite an involved, time-consuming process, involving two or more RAW file conversions, and lots of contrast masking with filters. There's no automatic action for this, as far as I know.
You've got to get the lighting right first, of course. No amount of editing can make good light when it wasn't already in the original photo; and anyone who thinks it's easy to just photoshop something any way you want and have it look good, please pass on your secrets to me:)
Since I had only kept two of the (table) legs, I used a tripod and moved them around in a couple of different frames and merge them together later to make it look like there were four. Unfortunately, I didn't realize during the shoot (but should've suspected) that I was repeatedly nudging the lens with the ring flash, which slightly shifted each frame. Not really enough to see it on the camera's LCD, but definitely enough to make merging the separate layers a gigantic pain in the... well, you know. Particularly since the six-year-old computer I was using at the time was so terminally ill that it sometimes took 10-15 minutes JUST TO SAVE A FILE. Grrrrr...
At least I can finally throw out those glass shards. Well, wait... hold on. Hmmm... maybe there's another photo concept that I can use them for... I think I'll just hold off throwing them out for a short little while...
P.S. I realize that technically there should be little pieces of glass all over the floor as well, but even I have my limits. Particularly since I'm already running low on glasses...
To view larger sizes, find out more about this photo, and see more of my work, please go to: www.robcorpuz.com
Thanks!
किसी के साथ रिलेशनशिप में होना एक सुखद अनुभूति का एहसास कराता है लेकिन जब यही रिश्ता टूटता है तो काफी तकलीफ भी होती है. अगर आप भी किसी ऐसी ही परिस्थिति से जूझ रहे हैं तो निश्चित रूप से यह समय आपके लिए तकलीफदेह है.
किसी के साथ प्यार भरे रिश्ते में रहने के बाद अचानक से जब यह टूटता है तो ऐसा लगता है...
#After, #Breakup, #Learn, #Men, #Things
Baby Talk - short film movie - outtakes - Central Park NYC - USA - November 7th 2020
************************
Baby Talk - film about a relationship change when the desire to have children is no longer shared equally.
All seems well on this autumn afternoon in Central Park NYC when Madison portrayed by Samara Riviera invites her partner Bronson portrayed by Ryan Janek Wolowski to meet for what he thinks is romantic stroll through the park, only to find out, Madison is enjoying her New York career life so much that she no longer wants to have a child, putting their eleven year relationship in jeopardy.
Film released 2021 USA
RYANISLAND Films
*****************************
Cast
Madison - Samara Riviera
Bronson - Ryan Janek Wolowski
Connie (Madison's best friend)
Terry (Bronson's sister)
Alex (Bronson's sisters partner)
**************************
Baby Talk filming locations
New York City USA
Upper West Side UWS
West 73rd Street
MTA New York City Subway Station C train to 72nd St
West 72nd Street
The Dakota Apartments
Central Park West ( Prior to the Park 8th Avenue / Frederick Douglass Boulevard )
Central Park NYC Historic District Entrance
Bridle Path
Strawberry Fields John Lennon of The Beatles memorial area
Imagine Circle
West Loop Drive
Daniel Webster Monument The Falconer bronze statue Central Park NYC area
Central Park Conservancy Central To The Park information booth
Wagner Cove Shelter
Cherry Hill Fountain Victorian stone water fountain
Bethesda Fountain Angel of the Waters statue (Biblical account of the Miraculous Pool of Bethesda in Jerusalem, Israel from the New Testament story of Jesus miraculously healing a paralyzed man, from the fifth chapter of the Gospel of John ) - Bethesda Terrace - Bethesda Arcade - Central Park Lake - Installed in 1873 - Landmarks of New York plaque
Bow Bridge
Cherry Hill Lake Walk - green park benches
******************************
I LOVE NY Fall Foliage Report
Week 9
November 4th thru 10th 2020
PEAK AUTUMN COLORS FOR NYC
*********************
Video and audio recording settings
Nikon D7500 is a 20.9-megapixel DSLR digital single-lens reflex camera
Video settings
1920 x 1080 60p
QT movie file type
Stereo audio
Nikon D7500 camera Released June 2 2017
Nikon D7500 camera sells for $1,339.05
******************************
Hashtag metadata tags
#BabyTalk
#Baby
#Talk
#BabyFever
#Babies
Twins
BabyStroller
#Mom
#Mother
#NewMom
#HavingTheTalk
#movie
#film
#ShortFilm
ShortFilms
#MovieOuttakes
#outtakes
Films
Movies
#CentralParkNYC
CentralPark
#Family
#StartingAFamily
#BecomingAParent
#BecomingParents
couple
relationship
#RelationshipGoals
Career
#CareerGirl
#IndependentWoman
#Girlfriend
#Fiance
#Madison
MadisonAve
MadisonAvenue
SamaraRiviera
SamaraElleRiviera
#Bronson
Brosnan
RyanJanekWolowski
RyanReporting
RYANISLANDFilms
actor
actors
actress
acting
#IndieFilm
#IndieMovie
#FilmFestival
LawOfAttraction
InstantManifestation
Manifestation
Autumn
AutumnInNewYork
AutumnInNY
Fall
FallInNewYork
NewYorkLovesFall
#NYLovesFall
FallFoliage
PeakFoliage
AutumnColors
AutumnMovie
AutumnFilm
FallEquinox
AutumnalEquinox
2020
2021
ILoveNY
MadeInNY
Photo
Video
A view of the lake at Claremont Gardens with part of the Island in the lake where you can just make out in the trees the Island Pavillion .
Vanbrugh's country retreat
In 1709, the renowned architect, playwright, courtier and spy Sir John Vanbrugh bought the area then known as Chargate Farm and Wood. He built himself an elegant retreat and began to develop the garden.
The birth of Claremont
Vanbrugh sold the estate to Thomas Pelham-Holles, the Duke of Newcastle in 1714. He helped the new owner develop 'Claremont', working on designing the gardens and extending the mansion.
A formal garden
In the early years of Claremont, around the 1720s, designer Charles Bridgeman crafted a formal garden for the Duke. His most notable addition was the three-acre turf amphitheatre, painstakingly carved into 'Bridgeman's Hill'.
A more natural design
As the formal garden went out of style in the 1730s, Newcastle employed William Kent to bring it up to date. He replanted large areas and expanded the 'round basin' at the base of the amphitheatre into a serpentine lake.
Clive of India
In 1769, Clive of India bought Claremont. He commissioned 'Capability' Brown to build a replacement mansion and move Portsmouth Road further away. Sadly, Lord Clive died in 1774 before work was finished.
Royal Claremont
During the period 1816-1922, Claremont became a much loved home to British and foreign royalty. Princess Charlotte and Prince Leopold added features like the Camellia greenhouse, but later owners made only minor alterations.
Breakup of the estate
In 1922 much of the Claremont estate was sold for housing development, leaving just the house and surrounding 210 acres of garden. Most buildings were demolished, but the house became a school in 1930.
The National Trust
Given to the treasury in lieu of tax, in 1949 the surviving 49 acres of the garden were passed to the National Trust. In the 1970s, a grant from the Slater Foundation allowed the Trust to restore the grounds.
Memories of Claremont
For nearly all the Duke of Newcastle's life, Claremont held a special place in his heart. It was somewhere he could relax away from his official duties as Secretary of State and Prime Minister.
Clive of India had big ambitions for Claremont but, despite his love for the estate, he was never able to live here. His new house wasn't completed until 1779, five years after his death.
Princess Charlotte wrote regularly of her great affection for her marital home. During their tragically brief time here, she and Prince Leopold spent many happy days together in the garden.
As a child, the future Queen Victoria lived a secluded and suffocating life at Kensington Palace. Staying with her Uncle Leopold at Claremont was a rare opportunity to enjoy some freedom.
"Although all cat games have their rules and rituals, these vary with the individual player. The cat, of course, never breaks a rule. If it does not follow precedent, that simply means it has created a new rule and it is up to you to learn it quickly if you want the game to continue." ~Sidney Denham
"Way down deep, we're all motivated by the same urges. Cats have the courage to live by them." ~Jim Davis
An undetermined species of creature dwelling in the water column is observed breaking apart at a depth of 2000 m, 15 June 2012.
Observation : 7380, 2012-06-15 02:15:42UTC, dive 1564.
N47°55.9872′, W129°6.4894′
Credit: NEPTUNE Canada/CSSF
Winter slowly relinquishing it's hold on the river at the old bridge abutments. Taken with a tiny Sony DSC-W610
The Breakup Song (They Don’t Write ‘Em) b/w When The Music Starts
Greg Kihn Band, Beserkley Records/USA (1981)
Breakup describes the feeling when of suddenly being left after a longtime relationship (such as marriage) without being given any explanation or the opportunity to make things right. It is the ultimate state of helplessness, deprived of any power to change this one-sided decision.
Can you imagine, if such a little river such as Ship Creek were like this, what it must be like on the Yukon or the Kuskokwim?
Benjamin - One of twelve banners representing the twelve tribes of Israel.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribe_of_Benjamin
According to the Torah, the Tribe of Benjamin (Hebrew: שבט בִּנְיָמִין, Modern Shevat Binyamin, Tiberian Shevaṭ Binyāmîn) was one of the Tribes of Israel descended from Benjamin, the youngest son of the patriarch Jacob and his wife Rachel. In the Samaritan Pentateuch the name appears as Binyamīm (Hebrew: בנימים, "Son of my right hand").
From after the conquest of the promised land by Joshua until the formation of the first Kingdom of Israel, the Tribe of Benjamin was a part of a loose confederation of Israelite tribes. No central government existed, and in times of crisis the people were led by ad hoc leaders known as Judges (see the Book of Judges).
Almost the entire tribe of Benjamin, women and children included, was wiped out by the other Israelite tribes after the Battle of Gibeah (related in the Hebrew Bible in Judges 20). The text refers several times to the Benjaminite warriors as "men of valour" [1] despite their defeat. A remnant of the tribe was spared: "those few who remained" [2] were allowed to marry women of another town, whose husbands had been killed, to enable the tribe to continue (Judges 21).
Tribe of Benjamin
Tribe of Benjamin
Tribe of Benjamin (light blue, lower centre)
Geographical rangeWest Asia
Period Confederated Tribes of Israel
Dates? – c. 1050 BCE
Major sites Jerusalem
Preceded by New Kingdom of Egypt
Followed by Kingdom of Israel (united monarchy)
According to the Torah, the Tribe of Benjamin (Hebrew: שבט בִּנְיָמִין, Modern Shevat Binyamin, Tiberian Shevaṭ Binyāmîn) was one of the Tribes of Israel descended from Benjamin, the youngest son of the patriarch Jacob and his wife Rachel. In the Samaritan Pentateuch the name appears as Binyamīm (Hebrew: בנימים, "Son of my right hand").
From after the conquest of the promised land by Joshua until the formation of the first Kingdom of Israel, the Tribe of Benjamin was a part of a loose confederation of Israelite tribes. No central government existed, and in times of crisis the people were led by ad hoc leaders known as Judges (see the Book of Judges).
Almost the entire tribe of Benjamin, women and children included, was wiped out by the other Israelite tribes after the Battle of Gibeah (related in the Hebrew Bible in Judges 20). The text refers several times to the Benjaminite warriors as "men of valour" [1] despite their defeat. A remnant of the tribe was spared: "those few who remained" [2] were allowed to marry women of another town, whose husbands had been killed, to enable the tribe to continue (Judges 21).
Responding to a growing threat from Philistine incursions, the Israelite tribes formed a strong, centralised monarchy. The first king of this new entity was Saul, from the tribe of Benjamin, (1 Samuel 9:1-2) which at the time was the smallest of the tribes. He reigned from Gibeah for 38 years (1 Samuel 8-31).
After Saul died, all the tribes other than Judah remained loyal to the House of Saul, but after the death of Ish-bosheth, Saul's son and successor to the throne of Israel, the tribe of Benjamin joined the northern Israelite tribes in making David — then king of Judah — king of the united Kingdom of Israel and Judah.[3] On the accession of Rehoboam, David's grandson, in c. 930 BCE the northern tribes split from the House of David to reform a Kingdom of Israel. The tribe of Benjamin remained a part of the Kingdom of Judah until Judah was conquered by Babylon in c. 586 BCE and the population deported.
Contents
Character
In the Blessing of Jacob, Benjamin is referred to as "a ravenous wolf";[4] traditional interpretations often considered this to refer to the might of a specific member of the tribe, either the champion Ehud, king Saul, or Mordecai of the Esther narrative, or in Christian circles, the apostle Paul.[5] The Temple in Jerusalem was traditionally said to be partly in the territory of the tribe of Benjamin (but mostly in that of Judah), and some traditional interpretations of the Blessing consider the ravenous wolf to refer to the Temple's altar, as simile in regard to the heavy presence there of biblical sacrifices.[5] Some scholars believe that it instead originates from the tribe having the figure of a wolf in its standard.
In Jewish Rabbinic literature, the Tribe of Benjamin is believed to correspond to the Hebrew month of Kislev.[citation needed]
Battle of Gibeah
Main article: Battle at Gibeah
The tribe of Benjamin is initially described in the Bible as being very pugnacious,[5] for example in the Song of Deborah, and in descriptions where they are described as being taught to fight left handed, so as to be able to wrong foot their enemies (Judges 3:15-21, 20:16, 1 Chronicles 12:2) and where they are portrayed as being brave and skilled archers. (1 Chronicles 8:40, 2 Chronicles 14:8)
However, an abrupt change of character to one of placidity occurs in the text after a traumatic incident for the tribe.[5] The Book of Judges recounts that the rape of the concubine of a member of the tribe of Levi, by a gang from the tribe of Benjamin resulted in a battle at Gibeah, in which the other tribes of Israel sought vengeance, and after which members of Benjamin were killed including women and children. Six hundred of the men from the tribe of Benjamin survived by hiding in a cave for four months.
The other Israelite tribes were grieved at the near loss of the tribe of Benjamin. They decided to allow these 600 men to carry on the tribe of Benjamin but no one was willing to give their daughter in marriage to them because they had vowed not to. To get around this, they provided wives for the men by killing the men from the tribe of Machir who had not shown concern for the almost lost tribe of Benjamin as they did not come to grieve with the rest of Israel. 400 virgin women from the tribe of Machir we found and given in marriage to the Benjaminite men. There were still 200 men remaining who were without a wife so it was agreed that they could go to a Jewish festival and hide in the vineyards, and wait for the young unmarried women to come out and dance. They then grabbed a wife each and took her back to their land and rebuilt their houses. (Judges 19-21)
Territory
According to the Hebrew Bible, following the completion of the conquest of Canaan by the Israelite tribes, Joshua allocated the land among the twelve tribes. Kenneth Kitchen dates this conquest to just after 1200 BCE.[6] However, according to the consensus of modern scholars, the conquest as described in the book of Joshua did not occur.[7][8][9]
The Bible recounts that Joshua assigned to Benjamin the territory between that of Ephraim to the north and Judah to the south, with the Jordan River as the eastern border, and included many historically important cities, such as Bethel, Gibeah, and encroached on the northern hills of Jerusalem. (Joshua 18:11-28)
Modern Israeli scholars have identified most of the towns mentioned in the Book of Joshua and that belong to the lot of Benjamin. Only those towns and villages on the northern-most and southern-most territorial boundary lines, or purlieu, are named in the land allocation—though, in actuality, all unnamed towns and villages in between these boundaries would still belong to the tribe of Benjamin. The Babylonian Talmud[10] names three of these cities, all of which were formerly enclosed by a wall, and belonged to the tribe of Benjamin: Lydda (Lod), Ono (Kfar 'Ana = كفر ئنا - wherein is now built Or Yehudah), and Gei Ha-ḥarashim. Presumably, the westward boundary of the tribe of Benjamin would have stretched as far as the Mediterranean Sea. Marking what is now one of the southern-most butts and bounds of Benjamin's territory is "the spring of the waters of Nephtoah" (Josh. 18:15), a place identified as Kefar Lifta (كفر لفتا), and situate on the left-hand side of the road as one enters Jerusalem. It is now an abandoned Arab village. The word Lifta is merely a corruption of the Hebrew name Nephtoah, and where a natural spring by that name still abounds.[11]
Though Jerusalem was in the territory allocated to the tribe of Benjamin (Joshua 18:28), it remained under the independent control of the Jebusites. Judges 1:21 points to the city being within the territory of Benjamin, while Joshua 15:63 implies that the city was within the territory of Judah. In any event, Jerusalem remained an independent Jebusite city until it was finally conquered by David[12] in c. 11th century BC and made into the capital of the united Kingdom of Israel.[13][14] After the breakup of the United Monarchy, Jerusalem continued as the capital of the southern Kingdom of Judah.
The ownership of Bethel is also ambiguous. Though Joshua allocated Bethel to Benjamin, by the time of the prophetess Deborah, Bethel is described as being in the land of the Tribe of Ephraim. (Judges 4:5) Then, some twenty years after the breakup of the United Monarchy, Abijah, the second king of Kingdom of Judah, defeated Jeroboam of Israel and took back the towns of Bethel, Jeshanah and Ephron, with their surrounding villages.[15] Ephron is believed to be the Ophrah that was also allocated to the Tribe of Benjamin by Joshua.[16]
Its situation, between the leading tribe of the Kingdom of Israel (Ephraim), and the leading tribe of the Kingdom of Judah (Judah),may have been prophesied in the Blessing of Moses, where it is described as dwelling between YHWH's shoulders.[17] Some textual scholars view this as a postdiction - maintaining that the poem was written long after the tribe had settled there.[18]
Fate
After the dissolution of the united Kingdom of Israel in c. 930 BCE, the Tribe of Benjamin joined the Tribe of Judah as a junior partner in the Kingdom of Judah, or Southern Kingdom. The Davidic dynasty, which had roots in Judah, continued to reign in Judah. As part of the kingdom of Judah, Benjamin survived the destruction of Israel by the Assyrians, but instead was subjected to the Babylonian captivity; when the captivity ended, the distinction between Benjamin and Judah was lost in favour of a common identity as Israel, though in the biblical book of Esther, Mordecai is referred to as being of the tribe of Benjamin,[19] and as late as the time of Jesus of Nazareth some (notably Paul the Apostle) still identified their Benjamite ancestry:
If anyone else thinks he may have confidence in the flesh, I more so: circumcised on the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of the Hebrews; concerning the law, a Pharisee; concerning zeal, persecuting the church; concerning the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.” [20]
See also:
Benjamin
Tribal allotments of Israel
References
^ Judges 20:44-46; the Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges suggests that the description should only have occurred once, in verse 46, and also appeared in verse 44 as the result of "a copyist's error", see Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges on Judges 20, accessed 18 November 2016
^ Judges 21:7 in the New Living Translation
^ ancienthistory.about.com/od/israeljudaea/f/UnitedMonarchy...
^ Genesis 49:27
^ a b c d Jewish Encyclopedia
^ Kitchen, Kenneth A. (2003), "On the Reliability of the Old Testament" (Grand Rapids, Michigan. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company)(ISBN 0-8028-4960-1)
^ “Besides the rejection of the Albrightian 'conquest' model, the general consensus among OT scholars is that the Book of Joshua has no value in the historical reconstruction. They see the book as an ideological retrojection from a later period — either as early as the reign of Josiah or as late as the Hasmonean period.” K. Lawson Younger, Jr. (1 October 2004). "Early Israel in Recent Biblical Scholarship". In David W. Baker; Bill T. Arnold. The Face of Old Testament Studies: A Survey of Contemporary Approaches. Baker Academic. p. 200. ISBN 978-0-8010-2871-7.
^ ”It behooves us to ask, in spite of the fact that the overwhelming consensus of modern scholarship is that Joshua is a pious fiction composed by the deuteronomistic school, how does and how has the Jewish community dealt with these foundational narratives, saturated as they are with acts of violence against others?" Carl S. Ehrlich (1999). "Joshua, Judaism and Genocide". Jewish Studies at the Turn of the Twentieth Century, Volume 1: Biblical, Rabbinical, and Medieval Studies. BRILL. p. 117. ISBN 90-04-11554-4.
^ ”Recent decades, for example, have seen a remarkable reevaluation of evidence concerning the conquest of the land of Canaan by Joshua. As more sites have been excavated, there has been a growing consensus that the main story of Joshua, that of a speedy and complete conquest (e.g. Josh. 11.23: 'Thus Joshua conquered the whole country, just as the LORD had promised Moses') is contradicted by the archaeological record, though there are indications of some destruction and conquest at the appropriate time." Adele Berlin; Marc Zvi Brettler (17 October 2014). The Jewish Study Bible: Second Edition. Oxford University Press. p. 951. ISBN 978-0-19-939387-9.
^ Tractate Megillah 4a
^ Walid Khalidi, All That Remains, Washington, D.C. 1992, pp. 300-303.
^ 1 Chronicles 11:4-8
^ Greenfeld, Howard (2005-03-29). A Promise Fulfilled: Theodor Herzl, Chaim Weizmann, David Ben-Gurion, and the Creation of the State of Israel. Greenwillow. p. 32. ISBN 0-06-051504-X.
^ "Timeline". City of David. Ir David Foundation. Retrieved 2007-01-18.
^ 2 Chronicles 13:17-19
^ Joshua 18:20-28, esp 23
^ Deuteronomy 33:12
^ Richard Elliott Friedman, Who Wrote the Bible? (Harper San Francisco) (1987) ISBN 0-06-063035-3
^ Esther 2:5
^ Philippians 3:4b-6
We stood there for 1/2 an hour, and we could watch Ship Creek break up, as well as hear it. There would be a loud crack, and we could see fissures develop, and chunks of ice break off and float down Ship Creek.
To see more information about this card, please check out my blogpost about it here: stampcolorcreate.blogspot.com/2011/09/lawnscaping-17.html
Green Mountain (w/ Flat Irons) and Bear Peak in the background as a fast moving thunderstorms starts to break up and move east. The sun is highlighting the still falling rain on Bear Peak in the background. A little sunbeam action adds to the interest.
Saw this rolled up on the driveway next door. Since no one actually lives there my dad went over to pick it up. He thought it was just some trash that was blown in from somewhere. Heh instead its a break-up letter that looks like a 10 year old wrote it.
Steve, whoever you are, be a man a break-up face to face.
The crossed out "love" is such a nice touch.
I don't know why I felt compelled to photograph myself at that moment.
I had just told my girlfriend, who was also my best friend, that I thought we should see other people. She was very upset. I was in the grip of heavy guilt.
It worked out for both of us.
A book that confronted me as I stepped into the library... I can't even read a book like this, but I thought it was poignant.
i supprted them very much.
so if they did breakup,whoever reads this is gonna put so much hate on me.
but i still like camilla.
it happens.breaking up is a part of life.
making mistakes,and sometimes there's a reason why you feel you need to break up with the person.
and of course everyone is SO quick to assume,it because of his purity and blah blah,DONT ASSUME SHE BROKE UP WITH HIM!!!
well just like people said when Jaylor was done "taylor's hurting but how do we know joe isnt?" EXACTLY now its the other way around,but with camilla.
just because he was crying during gotta find you doesnt mean she broke up with him.how do we know that they BOTH decided to see other people or something.
it may not be ALL her fault.
he is on a WORLD TOUR,she is FILMING,it's just one of the prices you pay for being so big in the business,they said it themselves,its hard to be in a relationship at the same time,they can't see eachother often,they might've both decided on it,so stop assuming shizz and saying all this crap about camilla.
and im glad joe changed the lyrics from "the girl's in front of me"
the song was origanally for the fans anyways.
camilla has been one of my favorite actress' for a very long time.
but everyone going "she's using him for fame and BLAH"
you'll see,you will,she's filming movies.and i guarantee all the camilla haters will watch one.so whatever.
and i seriously hope all the jomilla haters are happy!!
they got what they wanted,they're done and the haters are probably all super happy/
but joe isnt,so whoevers super happy jomilla is over,is pretty selfish,poor joe:|
and if you are happy about this breakup,you are saying that you are happy about joe's sadness pretty much.
if you are happy because "she was not good for him"
YOU DID NOT KNOW THAT!dont act like you know there personal lives.im sure camilla was wonderful for him,if she wasnt,he wouldve never went public with her and admitted to dating her.
if you are gonna post something pointless in this,don't even comment it.
i dont wanna see "CAMILLA IS A FUCKING SLUT BLAHBLAH I HATE HER I WANNA KILL HER!!" just STFU!!!!