Whatever you do Today, will get you closer to where you want to be Tomorrow!!

You can now study MBBS from the Top Medical Universities in Ukraine. MBBS colleges in Ukraine offer long-term experienced faculties guiding both national and international students towards their dream to become a doctor. The education system in Ukraine is simple and advanced. They also provide accommodation with a safe and friendly ambience.

Help yourself by choosing the best!!!

HURRY UP!! ADMISSIONS PROCESS IS OPEN!!!

For more information and assistance, you can contact us-

Call- +91-9599702863

Website- www.ukraineeducation.org

#StudyMBBSAbroad #MBBSinUkraine #MBBSAbroad #MBBSAdmission #MBBSfromUkraine #MBBS2019 #StudyMedicinefromUkraine #TopMedicalUniversityinUkraine

Get direct admission in PUMBA management quota seats. Call us at (+91) 7409347449 to discuss more about the admission process, eligibility and placements. Whether you are planning to UG or PG courses in management, you would always like to choose a right MBA college in India. However, there are lots of management colleges and business schools in India, but PUMBA is certainly the best choice to go with.

The best part of choosing PUMBA is that you can get direct admission in management courses under NRI quota seats. So, if you couldn’t score great in your CAT/MAT examination, you can still get admission in MBA.

About PUMBA (Pune University MBA)

PUMBA was founded in the year of 1971. When it comes to choosing the best business school in India, you will surely find Department of Management Sciences (DMS) right choice to go with. Since it’s an autonomous department of respective university of Pune, it provides direct admission in MBA or other management courses under management quota/NRI/sponsored quota seats.

What Are the Available Management Courses?

It’s an important question that should be answered adequately. If you want to get direct admission in PUMBA, you first need to know about available courses in business and management sciences. So, let’s check out a few top management courses available for direct admission in Pumba under management/NRI quota seats.

overseasmba.in/direct-admission-in-pumba-management-quota...

.

.

.

, .

-.

~1Yiet.:I .

-....

.. ..._-·---..-.

.

STUDENTS' FEDERATION OF INDIA-ALL INDIA STUDENTS' FEDERATION .

CARRY FORWARD UNITED STUDENTS' STRUGGLE FOR BETIER STUDENTS' FACIUTIESII .

INCREASE THE STRENGTH OF SFI-AISF IN JNUSU!! .

at.

SFI-AISF CANDIDATES FOR COUNCILLORS IN SSS AND SIS IQ .

cJ.

SSS: ZICO DASGUPTA SIS: CHIRANTAN KUMAR ;;( 18/04/07 'l .

J .

'.

Friends, .) j.

The student movement in our campus is faced with immense challenges in the coming one year. The present JNUSUcouncil has the .

sustained and united student movement would crucially affect the progressive democratic character of ourcampus in the coming days. responsibility of ensuring that all the challenges facing the students are resolved successfully. The leadership of JNUSU to build a .

From the very first day itself SFI-AISF representatives in the JNUSU have made all efforts to forge the broadest possible unity of ~ .

plan proposals in a democratic and transparent manner or other important demands like recognizing Allemiyat-Fazeelat .

students on these issues. Be it the issue of 27%OBCreservations and 54% Seat increase, struggle for more scholarships, formulation degrees for admissions to BA 1st year and ensuring transparency in admission process the SFI-AISF representatives have taken the .

of 11111 .

efforts been successful in pressurizing the administration to concede to many of our important demands like implementation .

lead in mobilizing students against the insensitive administration in various protest actions over this period. Not only have these of 27%0BC reservation In one go, formation of acommittee to strengthen the EOO, ratification of the rules and procedures of the GSCASH etc. but they have also helped In forging a broader unity of students on many issues which has strengthened our cause. The open meetings called by the JNUSU president on the issue of reservation were an initiative in this direction only The JNUSU President also called for an All Party Convention against the Supreme Court judgement staying OBC reservation. It were the .

women in cultural programmes in our hostel nights following complaints by a large number of girl students regarding a performance in .

SFI AISF representatives in the council who took the initiative of calling an open meeting of students on the issue of depiction of .

a cultural night in a partlcular hostel. Shamefully nobody from the AISA or their representatives in the JNUSU participated in that .

meeting barring a token presence by the JNUSUVP for afewminutes. .

It is this vision of the JNUSU, aimed at forging the broadest possible student unity, which the infantile ultras of the AI SA do not have..

.

For them the JNUSU platform is yet another means for attacking the SFI-AISF and extracting their sectarian political gains. Since the last elections, the JNUSU General Secretary has indulged in the worst forms of sectarian politics, while the JNUSU VP has been .

totally inactive in all major issues. The JNUSU Gen Secy has not even allowed council meetings to take place or let the election of .

conveners and GSCASHrepresentative happen till now. The inactivity and sectarian politics of the AISA within the JNUSU is exposed .

from the following: .

The JNUSU Gen. Secy., called separate demonstration on the Nithari issue, sabotaged the protest march on .

students, issues on 14th March. The AISA representatives In JNUSU did not even bother to call for a protest demo during the Academic Council .

.

.

meeting or report the proceedings of themeeting to the student community. .

The AISA was completely silent on the Issue of ratification of the rules and procedures of GSCASH, constitution of a .

committee for strengthening Equal Opportunity Office or increasing the amount under Earn-As-You-Learn scheme. .

The AISA has been completely silent against the YFE's black flag demonstration against Arjun Singh or the .

manhandling of Swami Agnivesh and Udlt Raj during aprogramme in JNU..

Neither the AISA nor their JNUSU representatives have taken any position on the YFE's obnoxious attacks on the .

JNUSU president for his commitment to the cause of 27% OBC reservations and seat increase. .

While the AISA has decided to conveniently neglect all these genuine issues and questions being raised by the SFI-AISF they are revoking the issue of Nandigram again and again to hide their utter inactivity and non-seriousness on students' issues. As far as the issue of Nandigram Is concerned, the SFI-AISF would like to state the following: .

On Nandlgram: 14 people have died in Nandigram due to the confrontation between the police and violent agitators. One person (out .

of 14) died because a bomb that he was trying to throw at the police burst in his hands. The police firing is highly unfortunate and .

Government, which Is committed to the cause of the working people1 particularly the rural poor. The Left Front Government .

deplorable because poor people have lost their lives. It Is particularly disturbing because it has happened under the Left Front in West Bengal must take immediate steps to ensure the restoration of peace and normalcy in Nandigram. The Left Front .

Government must also ensure that such Incidents of pollee firing do not occur in future. .

Congress, the BJP, the Congress, SUCI and naxalites cannot be overlooked. The issue of land acquisition had been settled when the .

The police firing on 14111 March is regrettable, but the culpability of the opposition parties in West Bengal, namely the Trinamool .

Chief Minister of West Bengal announced on 3rd February 2007 that no land would be acquired in Nandigram. Several all-Party meetings were convened both at the district as well as the state level to discuss and resolve the issue. The opposition deliberately stayed away, because they wanted the situation to precipitate. they were forcibly evicted from the villages. The area was declared out of bounds for the district administration and all communication Over 3500 Left sympathisers, all poor villagers, have been staying in makeshift relief camps over the past two and a half months since .

links and roads were cut off. This was surely not a democratic form of protest. Moreover, the demand on the basis of which the protest .

.

On Wednesday, April 29th, 2015, Micheal Broski, a representative from West Point Academy visited Utica Academy of Science Charter School. Scholars in grades 7 through 10 were given a survey to indicate whether they are interested to hear from West Point Academy or not. There were 83 scholars who signed up for it. Mr. Broski had arrived to give information about the admission process of West Point and other programs are being offered at West Point Academy. West Point Academy’s role in our nation's history dates back to the Revolutionary War, when both sides realized the strategic importance of the commanding plateau on the west bank of the Hudson River. General George Washington considered West Point to be the most important strategic position in America. Washington personally selected Thaddeus Kosciuszko, one of the heroes of Saratoga, to design the fortifications for West Point in 1778, and Washington transferred his headquarters to West Point in 1779. Continental soldiers built forts, batteries and redoubts and extended a 150-ton iron chain across the Hudson to control river traffic. Fortress West Point was never captured by the British, despite Benedict Arnold's treason. West Point is the oldest continuously occupied military post in America. Mr. Broski showed a video which was amazing to have students get an idea what they do at West Point. Students asked a lot of questions to Mr. Broski to learn more about it. Students answered some questions, they earned a USB drive, and several other prizes.

On Wednesday, April 29th, 2015, Micheal Broski, a representative from West Point Academy visited Utica Academy of Science Charter School. Scholars in grades 7 through 10 were given a survey to indicate whether they are interested to hear from West Point Academy or not. There were 83 scholars who signed up for it. Mr. Broski had arrived to give information about the admission process of West Point and other programs are being offered at West Point Academy. West Point Academy’s role in our nation's history dates back to the Revolutionary War, when both sides realized the strategic importance of the commanding plateau on the west bank of the Hudson River. General George Washington considered West Point to be the most important strategic position in America. Washington personally selected Thaddeus Kosciuszko, one of the heroes of Saratoga, to design the fortifications for West Point in 1778, and Washington transferred his headquarters to West Point in 1779. Continental soldiers built forts, batteries and redoubts and extended a 150-ton iron chain across the Hudson to control river traffic. Fortress West Point was never captured by the British, despite Benedict Arnold's treason. West Point is the oldest continuously occupied military post in America. Mr. Broski showed a video which was amazing to have students get an idea what they do at West Point. Students asked a lot of questions to Mr. Broski to learn more about it. Students answered some questions, they earned a USB drive, and several other prizes.

Thank you to the prospective students and parents that visited Emory & Henry on Saturday for STEM and Church Leadership Fellows scholarship interviews. We enjoyed spending the day with you learning about our unique living and learning community, the admissions process, financial aid opportunities and more!

If you missed this weekend, schedule your interview with STEM or Church Leadership by contacting our Admissions Office at 800.848.5493 or email admission@ehc.edu. www.ehc.edu/visit

NZ immigration ltd offer student visa: Get student visa from IANZ. Are you planning for higher study in NEW Zealand? Your search is end here. To get best tips and advice for student visa contact IANZ-best immigration adviser in auckland. Get to know admission process, visa enquiry and application process. bit.ly/3eHLXex

abcnews.go.com/Politics/americans-approve-supreme-court-d...

Most Americans approve of Supreme Court decision restricting use of race in college admissions: POLL

Most Americans support the Supreme Court's decision on affirmative action.

A little more than half of Americans – 52% -- approve of the U.S. Supreme Court decision on restricting the use of race as a factor in college admissions, while 32% disapprove and 16% saying they don't know.

A majority of Republicans (75%) and independents (58%) approve of the ruling, while a distinct minority of Democrats approve (26%).

news.yahoo.com/supreme-court-rules-colleges-must-14105964...

Supreme Court rules that colleges must stop considering the race of applicants for admission

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that colleges and universities must stop considering race in admissions, forcing institutions of higher education to look for new ways to achieve diverse student bodies.

In a 6-3 decision, the court struck down admissions plans at Harvard and the University of North Carolina, the nation's oldest private and public colleges, respectively.

thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4061133-supreme-cour...

Supreme Court upends affirmative action in college admissions

www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/supreme-court-decisions/in...

|Supreme Court guts affirmative action in college admissions

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the opinion for the conservative majority.

In a Pew Research Center poll released earlier this month, half (50%) of US adults say they disapprove of selective colleges and universities taking race and ethnicity into account in admissions decisions in order to increase the racial and ethnic diversity at the school. One-third (33%) approve, with the remaining 16% unsure. Support for colleges giving consideration to race and ethnicity is higher among Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents (54% approve, 29% disapprove) and Black Americans (47% approve, 29% disapprove) than it is among White Americans (29% approve, 57% disapprove) or Republicans and Republican leaners (14% approve, 74% disapprove).

Roughly half (49%) of all US adults in the Pew poll say that the consideration of race and ethnicity makes the overall admissions process of these colleges less fair, with just 20% saying it makes the process more fair. But 36% say that considering race and ethnicity in admissions is good for ensuring equal opportunity for Americans of all racial and ethnic backgrounds, higher than the 31% who say it's bad for that purpose.

A CBS News/YouGov survey highlights the extent to which framing matters on this topic. In the poll, taken in mid-June, a 70% majority of Americans say the Supreme Court should rule that colleges are not allowed to consider race in admissions, with just 30% saying that the court should rule that colleges are allowed to continue considering race. At the same time, the poll finds a much closer split on affirmative action more generally: Just over half of the public (53%) says that affirmative action programs in hiring, promoting and college admissions should be continued, with 47% saying such programs should be abolished.

A group of 50 Officers of Rajya Sabha Secretariat, also including officers of various ministries and departments of Government of India, visited ISB to know about some of the key aspects of the School with specific reference to its research and capacity building. The officers were in Hyderabad as part of their two-week capacity building programme being facilitated by MCRHRDI of Telangana. The officers enquired on multiple aspects of the School including, larger roles and vision, admission process, educational options for senior Govt officers, Short duration courses, ranking, certification, fee, besides others.

To get the admission for the MBBS in Tashkent Medical Academy Urgench at an affordable fee structure, contact us for admission process and further details.

On Saturday, Nov. 17, the HWS Office of Admissions will host "The Admissions Game" with Peter Van Buskirk as part of their Open House.

The Open House will begin at 9 a.m. in the Office of Admissions.

Guests will receive a tour of campus, hear from students and faculty and participate in The Admission Game®, an interactive presentation of the college admission process featuring Peter Van Buskirk, author, admissions expert and creator of "The Best College Fit."

The American academy for international dentist offers a bench test preparatory course for international dentists. In this bench test prep course helps dentists prepare and practice for their bench test exams conducted in the universities during admission process for foreign dental graduates. Individual attention for each student with 25 years experienced dentist. The size of the class is also small and customized training will be provided for each student.

.

· d assa ults on progressive. democratic forces, movements and organisations. !1 .

We are witnessing an overall trer.ld of organ!se . c.b t II. clamp.ed down on women, students, farmers, workers and any West Bt.ngal for instance, the Tnnamool regime hads ru da y fall Left political opponents the killing of SFI activist Sudipto in.

. . . . e indulging in violence ()11 mur er 0 I I II.

.

democratrc dlsse~trng vorc '. . . . his overall scenario of organised p·oiitical vendetta, killing and vro ence, a police custody berng a cas e In rornt. Meanwhr~e, In t h d kharan in Kerala or popular leader of tea-garden workers.

b 1 d 5 of communrst leader T P C an rase ' b those responsible ruta mur er -. t d . the struggle for the oppressed for instance -have not yet een.

Gangaram Kol or youth leader Bhalyyaram Yadav mar yre In .

brought to book. . .

, · , ke a shameful mockery of representative democracy, when our sovereignty .

At a time when our so-called representatives ma t tl subverted in the name of 'national interest', it is high time for and the interests of common people of the country are con,s an hy "ted resistance Whether it is these struggles or else the.

d d t' 0·ces to come together and aunc a sp1n · d progressive an emocra IC v I d . t entrenched patriarchal biases in our society which continue to eny women protracted struggle for gender-just Jaws an agams I t play During the past year too JNUSU and the JNU student.

d d'1 ·t th tudent movement has an Important roe o . ' .

~~::~n:~;has~~~c~'ag;~ taken forward struggles for students' rights, women's freedom, social justice and democracy. .

.

JNUSU: carrying Forward the Mandate for Social Inclusion, Democratization, Against Commercialization .

Fo the JNUSU the past one year has been one of struggles to defend and expand the democratic ethos of JN~. Since March20~2, JNUSU ~as spearheaded several struggles for social inclusion and democr~tisation a~d for b~tter rnfrastructure. committed to the idea ot educational institutions which are inclusive and affordable, and ~~1ch proactively work towards ensuring that higher education does not remain the exclusive preserve of the rich and the prrvlieged, JNUSU took up several .

Initiatives and struggles in the past one year. .

Towards Social Justice and Inclusion .

In JNU, several struggles have been fought for social inclusion: to restore deprivation points for women and for students from .

deprived backgrounds and backward areas, for recognision of madarsa certificates, for increasing merit-cum-means fellowships .

and against the faulty cut-off criterion for osc students. This legacy of struggle was carried forward during the past year too: .

Towards reducing we!ghtage of viva marks: The student community is aware that since March 2012, JNUSU has been engaged In a protracted struggle to reduce the weightage of viva voce in the JNU admission process. Following the initiatives of the previous JNUSU, this issue was taken up for the first time in JNU's history of more than 40 years and as a result of JNUSU's struggles, ~ committee to analyse trends in JNU's viva voce marks was set up. The findings of the committee very clearly nailed the discriminatory trends in viva voce, and these findings were submitted to the Academic Council during its meeting on 30 October 2012. 1t is highly unfortunate that the AC chose to underplay the systemic .

discrimination revealed by the viva committee's findings, and in fact tried to sideline and ignore this committee by setting up another committee to look into the viva issue. During the AC meeting, JNUSU rejected the diversionary tactics of the AC.

and its proposal to set up this new committee. .

It has to be noted that during the student community's struggle for reduction in viva voce, we received the support of several teachers too, including some representatives of the JNUTA. However, a certain section of the teaching community, including those who avowedly take progressive ideological positions, opposed the student's democratic demand. What worsened the matter was a hyperactive intervention by a faculty memb~rjust. before the AC meeting held on 30th October I' .

20.12. This faculty member submitted a formal written proposal (co-signed VJith another teacher} opposing the reduction in ! viva weightage and mooting some questionable .'alternatives', thus sending a political signal as well as providing a ' convenient way out for the Vice Chancellor's .subsequent move to form a new committee clearly devised to bury the .

findings of the earlier viva committee. : .

After the Academic Council, the JNUSU decided to explore various other means, including political and legal struggles, to carry this demand forward. In this regard, JNUSU representatives also contacted well-known lawyers who have fought and won cases related to social justice -including the case against the wrong cut-off criteria for OBC students which was scuttling the proper implementation of OBC reservations. However, the reluctance as well as 'inconsistent and non-committal communication with the lawyer by the JNUSU President (who heads the JNUSU) constrained JNUSU as an institution to move ahead in this strategic legal case. Given the all-round opposition to reduction in viva weightage and entrenched vested interests, this struggle requires a firm ideological commitment of the entire JNUSU as an institution and .

the capacity to engage in the legal case with consistency and coherence. .

Exoand!ng the Scope of Financial Assistance : During the past one year, JNUSU has waged a protracted struggle for enhancement of MCM to Rs 3000 per month. This struggle has seen various forms-from protest demonstrations against the JNU admin.istr~tlon, protests at the UGC and MHRD, university strikes and hunger strike's. Inch-by-inch we have moved ahead in our ~t~uggl~, but the powers-that-be remain adaman.t. And in this struggle, we have. been pitted against not just the JNU adm1nrstrat1on .and go~ernments ~h.o are hell-bent on using the bogey of "fund-cuts" to cut state funding on .

education, but also agamst the1r agents wrthrn the student community. As a result of the sustained pressure from the .

student movement, the JNU administration has enhanced the MCM amount to Rs 2000 h . .

.

per mont , w1th effect from .

4 .

.

.

that their political masters are busy wooing corporates and FDI, destroying unions, Implementing the liberalization policy that has ushered In contractualisation. So what if workers who keep JNU running are denied the legal minimum wages and .

!.

other basic legal entitlements? After all they do not vote! .

When the administration clamped down on studentS by suspending ten students the active betrayal of the JNUSU .

led collective.

leadership came to the fore. The JNUSU office bearers refused to ~ke collective responsibility of a JNUSU protest and submitted individual regret letters thereby capitulating before the administration's first attempt at individual witch hunt. The SFI dominated JNUSU council passed a resolution that deliberately misconstrued and stigmatized the agitation. (The AISA faction had abstained on this resolution.) The suspended activists of DSU refused to submit Individual letters of regret, and took the Initiative to call for a UGBM and let the highest decision maklng body of the University decide. Thell'first UGBM was shamefully scuttled by the JNUSU President who ran away with the· quorum sheets. In the reconvened UGBM, the same regressive JNUSU council resolution was floored. AISA, which had ear1ier abstained In the council, now joined SFI to support it, while DSU along with a large number of common students opposed it! In the UGBM the SFI floored resolutions to support Proctorial enquiry and force the DSUions of the UGBM.

activists to submit individual regret letters. Both the resolutions were defeated overwhelmingly. The decisare binding uoon the JNUSU to act on. Neither factions of the JNUSU were ready to do that thereby undermining the .

' and students' rights,legitimacy of UGBM. This pathetic apathy and inaction severely weakened the movem~nt for workers.

etters much against their wish. The lnactlon continued as the administrationand forced the DSU activists to give individual l.

went ahead with the Proctorial enquiry. The JNUSU to its own comfort remained a mute spectator without any .

concrete action to prevent that. When the Proctorial enquiry decided to rusticate 9 students and Imposed fine on three office bearers, fresh iction that it was the participation of a huge number of students and their.

agitation started. And one can say this with conv.

determined agitation along with the support of teachers and other prominent activists and Intellectuals that finally forced the administration to come to an agreement; despite the weak and dithering union leadership. The victory for the students and workers could have been far more decisive had the Union leadersh[p not capitulated before the administration and diluted the terms of agreement. SFI who had till then been pushing the administration's demand for individual appeal suddenly did an about tum, in a desperate attempt at competitive radicalism. Their logic: since they are 'Union Office Bearers', they are holy cows who are above the common students. Therefore, any attack on them is an attack on JNUSU! As if the common students are NOT JNUSU and any attack, individual victimization on them is justified! Be It Nestle, Manmohan Singh Protest or the workers' struggle, the track record of SF! is what one might expect of the perpetrators of the Nandlgram massacre. Following the struggle some progress has been made In ensuring the rights of workers. However, tbe gains are more sporadic than regular. The administration had formed a committee which Is yet to evolve a regular mechanism. .

Charter of Demands: Just clubbing genuine and just demands in the charter and presenting them to the authority Is not enough as the authority will never bother to concede to that unless there is a strong movement to back It up. For example .

the struggle to increase MCM went on with an indefinite hunger strike of more than 7 days. But the administration conceded only after a huge number of students gathered In the Ad-Block and threatened a militant agitation If the demands were not met. JNUSU leadership would like us to forget that the strength of the union lies In collective student mobilization. Similarly the demands for recognition of Alimiyat-Faziliyat certificates in JNU admission process as well as the democratization ofthe Equal 0Dportuoity Cell are very important and genuine demands which keep coming back in the drafts of the Charter of Demands every year and are made to be mere election stunts. The Agreement that the administration had signed with the JNUSU on 12th July had yielded nothing again except some empty promises and constitution of some bureaucratic committees that nevercome up with any concrete measures. In case of the scholarships forM. Phil/Ph. D students, the administration completely ignored the demand of the cut off date set by JNUSU and arbitrarily had set a date of its own, disrespecting the agreement. The JNUSU resigned to calling a token protest and NOT launch a widespread movement · among the students. The administration by disrespecting all the clauses of the agreement shows how little it cares for JNUSU or student opinion. The same apathy and disinterest Is visible on both the union leadership and admlnlstratlon towards combating the communal, castelst right-wing goons on campus. The administration dares to show such apathy because it. kn~ws that by and large the JNUSU leadership doesn't differ when It comes to larger policy decisions, the rhetoric of opposition IS more a device to court votes and act as a safety valve for diverting student discontent. Imagine, when year after year, token demonstrations and negotiations yield no result, how can any really committed, really democratic union not take on matters on a larger scale, through UGBMs and mobilizations! .

Think ~bout these experiences when you choose your representative. You are also choosing whether to let the .

administration corp?rati~ ~ecampus at will, or the campus will fight tooth and nail to defend Its democratic space and expa~d lt. Your cho1ce W1ll1mpact on how this campus will fight for the rights of deprived students and oppressed castes ~nd dispossessed contract workers. Of course, the JNUSU election is not the be all and end all of the struggle for a more JUst, more equal, more sensitive campus. But it is Indeed an Important step. The Union Is an important tool for intensifying .

the struggle for student dem_ands. Our choice will either sharpen or blunt this weapon. But do remember, that no matter .

wh~yo~ vote, any meantngful struggle to democratize the c:ampus will need your political solidarity and active.

..

partaclpation throughout the year. .

Central Panel: sss Councilors:RITUPAN .

BANOJYOTSNA.

(President) .

SUMATI.

.

SEROHI .

UMA.

(Gen Sec) VANESSA.

ELURI SUNEETHA.

.

{lt Sec) .

LUUI y, .

.

.

AISA Strengthen the Struggle for Struggle for Workers' Rights in JNU Extends to KC.

.

02.02.07 Social Justice, Democracy On the night of 30 January, a young boy working in Lala's fruit shop.

and Transparency in JNU Ad- of the Kamal Complex was thrashed by the shop owner. The shop.

owner thrashed the worker on his head and face with helmet leading.

Join JNUSU's missions! to injury and bleeding on the shameful pretext that the young boy.

was overeating in his dinner. AISA representatives in JNUSU had.

PROTEST DEMO. taken up the matter immediately. It also came to light that the boy.

was being underpaid..

Ad Block 03.02.07 2.00pm.

As a follow up yesterday, JNUSU General Secretary as well as several.

Implement 27% Reservation and 54% seat In- activists and common students went to Kamal Complex to question.

crease in JNU without delay the shop-owner, and to ensure that the boy was paid an amount of.

Rs. 20, 000 (the arrears of his salary for the past nine months at the.

Accept Alimiat and Fazeelat and other Madarsa minimum wage rate). Subsequently, in a spirited move, students did.

certificates in BA 1st year admissions an impromptu survey of all the shops at KC, and unearthed evidence.

of an abysmal violation of the minimum wage rate in all the shops..

Uphold Sachar Committee Recommendations The wage rate actually being paid was obtained in writing with the.

signature of the workers..

Ensure Transparency in Admission Processes.

the display of break-up of Written/Viva marks, Ever since the AISA Office Bearers in JNUSU initiated the movement.

fixing of minimum/maximum marks for viva, in mid-November, a large number of common students have joined the.

struggle to ensure workers' rights in various parts of the campus. We.

make provisions for vivas in different languages, warn the Administration that the gross violation of labour rights that is.

BA entrance exam to be offered in Hindi as well,.

and do away with caste identification in viva forms.

.

Unmask SFI' s Pretension Of `Open Debate' : WORDS Vs DEEDS Of.

SFI's SEZ Policy.

.

After forcibly evicting peasants from fertile multi-crop land at Singur, with the DEEDS and DOCUMENTS of the West Bengal Govt. ?.

fencing off the land and handing it over to the Tatas, after raping and.

killing Tapasi Malik, after killing six peasants in Nandigram, after avoiding Why did the West Bengal SEZ Act 2003, passed two years before.

all democratic debate in people's panchayats of the respective areas, after the Central Act, include the same anti-worker provisions that the SFI.

lying about the Haldia Development Authority Notification of land acquisi- claims to oppose in its booklet?.

tion in Nandigram.....And after shamelessly defending each of these.

crimes, SFI has suddenly woken up to the need for an `Open Debate' We will look at many more such facts pertaining to SFI's proposed.

on its corporate land grab project in West Bengal. The fact remains: why `amendments' in the days to come..

has the SFI NOT answered the key questions in the ONGOING debate:.

"Welcome To See Website" But Barred to Verify.

Is productive industrialisation impossible without SEZs which At Groundsite !.

are `foreign territory' on Indian soil, giving corporates `Special' rights.

to Evade taxes and even laws of the land, Evict peasants, and Exploit SFI boasts of its perfect `rehabilitation package' and `list of consenting.

labour? farmers' on the West Bengal Government's website. Will SFI DENY that.

according to the figures quoted in that same website, the average.

SFI moots various "amendments" in the SEZ Act 2005. In the days to amount of `compensation' given to each displaced person is a mer.

come, we'll look at the Claim and Reality of some of their proposed e Rs. 83, 000? Will they tell us how an individual.

'amendments'. Let us sample just one Claim today: is supposed to survive on such an amount once displaced from their land,.

home and livelihood?.

Claim : Workers' Rights.

But why is SFI so scared to allow people to check the claims of.

SFI's booklet demands: `Amend those rules which enables State its website at the ground-site? Why are Medha Patkar arrested, and AISA.

Governments to delegate its powers under Industrial Disputes Act to and CPI(ML) members of a fact-finding team put behind bars with false.

Development Commissioner and to declare SEZs as Public Utility Service'. cases continuing till now? Isn't field-trip and ground survey an integral.

part of any investigation and `open debate'?.

(This is because in Public Utility Services, workers are denied the right to.

strike, and the `Special' Development Commissioner of SEZ is, in a way, Many say that the Sardar Sarovar Dam (Narmada) Rehabilitation.

the Viceroy of the `foreign territory' called SEZ. His job is to benefit the Package is the very best package - but only ON PAPER! The shameful.

corporate `ruler' of the SEZ, not to ensure workers' rights). reality of rehabilitation and resettlement on the ground in the Narmada.

Valley was revealed by the NBA's Pol Khol Yatra in which AISA leader.

Reality Awadhesh from JNU as well as the AISA National President, took part..

.

West Bengal SEZ Act 2003, passed long before the Central Act of Will SFI agree to allow a similar Pol Khol Yatra of JNU students.

2005, declares SEZs to be Public Utility and delegates powers to and senior academics in Singur and Nandigram?.

Development Commissioner. Not only that, a Brochure distributed by.

the WB Government among industrialists, titled "Doing Business in West The Issue at Stake.

Bengal", (Section 6.2.2, page 98) proudly promises:.

The `debate' is not a petty quarrel between AISA and SFI. It is a ques-.

"CERTAIN KEY BENEFITS IN WEST BENGAL FOR SEZ UNITS: tion of taking sides in the raging battle between evicted peasants and.

terrorised poor struggling for survival on one side, and corporates.

All units in SEZ declared as public utility services grabbing land backed by the might of State on the other. It is a battle.

between the rights of aam aadmi and `special' `foreign' enclaves of preferred.

Development Commissioner to be the Reconciliation Officer people on the other. SFI and CPI(M) have shown that they stand for the.

for all Labour Disputes in SEZ..." privileges and profit of corporates, not the struggles of the poor. SFI already.

showed this in its defence of the Nestle Outlet in JNU - and once again.

Will SFI tell us why the CLAIMS of its booklet in JNU do not match.

sd/-Rajesh Ranjan,V.P., AISA, JNU.

sd/-Awadhesh, Gen.Secy., AISA, JNU.

..

Must have passed qualifying examinations (HSC/ ‘A’ level) or equivalent examination.

SSC/ ‘O’ or equivalent examination passed not before 2016

HSC/ ‘A’ or equivalent examination passed not before 2018

Minimum aggregate GPA in SSC or equivalent and HSC or equivalent: 8.00 (eight)

Min. GPA either in SSC or equivalent or in HSC or equivalent: 3.5

Minimum GP in biology: 3.5

For calculation of GPA against the marks obtained in SSC/ ‘O’ level or equivalent exam, only top 5 subjects are considered for calculation of GPA. Therefore, GPA in ‘O’ level = (total marks obtained in top five subjects) ÷ 5

For calculation of GPA against the marks obtained in HSC/ ‘A’ level or equivalent exam, only 3 subjects (Physics, Chemistry and Biology) are considered for calculation of GPA.

Qualifying Grade in each subject individually is “C”. Therefore, GPA in ‘A’ level = (total marks obtained in three subjects) ÷ 3

MBBS in Bangladesh No Donation MCI Approved Colleges, Best Choice for Low fees Medical Study without donation MBBS Admission. Documents required for MBBS Admission Process in Bangladesh Duly filled in application forms in triplicate along with following documents:

All certificates must be duly attested by the competent authority, i. e. the Education Ministry of the respective country and also be authenticated by the respective Bangladesh Missions abroad/Foreign Missions based in Dhaka.

Successful applicants will require producing all academic certificates and mark-sheets/ transcripts in original during their admission.

Shanelle Gordon, a Brown University graduate, founded United Mentoring in Miami, Florida to help students of color and first-generation college applicants in the college admissions process. She started the program at her high school alma mater to fill a need in a community that she belongs to as these populations are underrepresented at selective universities. In the mentoring program, rising senior high school students are paired one-to-one with mentors from Ivy League and similarly competitive schools. Mentors support students' academic development and assist them in navigating the application process. .

The students of B.Sc Nursing will be trained to work in different specialities. The nursing students will be trained on fundamentals of operation theatre technology, pharmacology, pathology, first aid, emergency response, trauma care, gynaecology, nephrology and other medical related fields. The B.Sc Nursing students will be given fundamental training on medical practices along with the training on professional nursing and midwifery. The B.Sc Nursing students will be learning all the important aspects of nursing during the course duration. The programme is aimed at imparting a thorough knowledge of the basics of the nursing profession.

Nursing is the noble profession in healthcare that focuses on the care of individuals, families and communities so that they attain, maintain or recover optimal health and lead a healthy lifestyle. The main aim of nursing is to provide care and treatment to sick individuals and help them to recover from their illness.

ADMISSION PROCESS

Merit-based: Candidates from Karnataka who have qualified Karnataka CET can attend counseling sessions to obtain government reserved seats for the course.

Management-based: Candidates can fill the Admission Form in the website. The college will short-list and inform candidates about available Management quota seats based on the merit.

Documents required: 10th and 12th level certificates and 2-3 passport size photographs.

Admission opens 2021 are the top ranked medical colleges for Nursing in Bangalore, click on : www.akashinstitutions.com/akash-college-of-nursing

Peranakan Culture Extravaganza For Miss Universe Singapore!!

Join Indian Institute Of Fashion & Design-IIFD.in

For #Admission_Process Call @+919041766699 OR Visit @ iifd.in/

.

Find us on Map-

Chandigarh:- g.page/IIFD-Chandigarh

Mohali:- g.page/IIFDMohaliCampus

#IIFD_CHANDIGARH #Fashion #Designing #iifd

.

a. c u-' .~~:~ ·. ,. r~ '-() 4) c-..J.

I~} I~L n. .

~ . .,_ o: !. , f!"~ 10i .

~· ·: .,., '. ' .ill ·~ ' ..... ·!! 'fir;~ ·:~:..: ~~~ ··., ::' "CS 0.

: :~:f;'· .

': ;~ .., ;: .. ~:!.

J.' -.....1 .. ·~ !l.-·~ ;. 11 '·.;~-,,,: ' ;_~-.fl; ;'It ~~.; ;; ;(!' ··:; .:· ~r.~-. , .. -~· ,l· .~:; a. ~ (.).

!'·-''· ·~·~· : ;;: .. :~ :~r-.

t. I' L!~!:J~-~]' ' ~ H t~ (Jill~' ;~t. i!lJi . ~:; ,r:,·· .....-·~-:. ~, :'·~ ~--=· ,j: ti; . ! '-.

l.'~ o' ,· o; 'o· 1 ,, .;.1,; !i :1 ·,_,. ., .. ...~ :· () tn :::> ; r~,;;-. .

.

' .: ·!.1: I ~ " ll ~~ -~; 1 ·; _ _l ~:-,.. .. , , ~1'J · ., ~~o ·~ ~-u. (/) .

. ·., .

(J.

't : ··, :~ !: ~~-. !j,_IJ,~--,;. i . .-·-.'· 1:'l_ ·-' ,;~ . -. ' . '.. . ·......

.., _,..~ .;. !;'}. .' I\,.' . . '.. ..]. '· !;:~.-'· :: :~ ' !" .-~~ .-~ '· ,. Q).

i ;} : L,~:'·,hj:;~ ~:_ ~f .:· ,. u. ~ ' : ,. '·-,..1.0 ~ -. ' ' ~··I;- i!.o :-It. l.' > z.

~ t~ '~ I' '· 0 i'; '!J~ 't ii ;~, !;·,1· .::111. -; :'>l ··:... 1· ~.:. '· . ~ ... -,'\:· ~-o' :·-~tt''f} f:' I 'I1 .,,: ~~ ~i-! 'O o:.

I'. ; ' : ~.

:: '· . t·j~: . ~.:,. ~~·:.· .

" ' ' ·: r:~:~~:~..~~-;f_\ ,-.·:_,:. .

,.-:,~f;· ,,!· -~-,~:: :~:t;:i~;!.~~-~·;;~ .: ;1~~ -!:1 ·~ ·-c Q) (1).

_... .

en.

::» 0.rJ .-.c .

In particular, in 2006 and 2007, the intake/offer/joined for CESP (MA) had been:.

Intake .

Offered.

2006 Joined.

50 .

107.

2007 so -I I8 42 .

4 I.

In particular. for example, the intake/offer/joined for CESP (MA) in 2006 and 2007, had been:.

.

.

"Seats Offer" does NOT indicate and is NOT equivalent to the actual number of seats and the actual number.

of students in the University. .

The "offer" method so far adopted is merely a one-shot measure to fill the intake..

.

So, the SFI's devious method of only projecting "seats offered" as the actual number of seats, and.

thereby spreading that there is a massive seat-cut is a complete travesty of facts and truth. .

reservation and seat increase that is being initiated this year? .

Will SFI clarify: Can "seats offered" which they are peddling, be the basis of implementation of .

'..

Let us note that there are two possible methods of fulfilling the " intake". One method practiced so far is the "seats.

offered" method, whereby some extra seats over and above the "intakeu are announced, once and for all, to fulfil the.

"intake". The other method is to have a waiting list and announce a series of time-bound 2"d/3rd lists from amongst the.

waitlisted candidates. as is being practiced this year (2008). It is to be noted that JNUSU strongly stood for the.

continuation of the "offer system" in the Academic Council meeting for fulfilling "intake" compared to the wart list_.

fulfilling the intake in course of the new admission system for this year when OBC reservation and seal increase was .

system. However majority of the faculty and centres argued in favour of waitlist and subsequent 200/3rd list systems fo.-.

to be implemented. .

But whatever be the debate regarding the method of fulfilling the uintake", the crucial.

.

issue was the correct implementation of OBC reservations and seat increase in the new admission policy, for.

which "intake" of 2006 forms the legal basis for all calculations and NOT "seats offered"..

.

Another big confusion that SFI is indulging in is to equate incomparables : compare.

the "offer" list of last year (2007) with the very first "intake"listof this year (2008)..

Since the earlier method of one-shot "seat offer" method has not been adopted this year, any data on "seats offered".

in 2008 will have to include the seats in first list along with all the subsequent (2nd/ 3rd etc) lists announced. For.

example, in CESP (MA). so far in 2008, 97 students have been offered seats (62 in the 1st list and 35 m the 21'd list).

.

towards fulfilling the mandated "intake" . Overall in JNU so far, 2102 students have already been offered seats till.

Saturday afternoon {Aug 2. 2008), and not 1836 which SFI has quoted in its malicious poster campaign. Clearly, even.

if we talk in terms of "seats offered", correct calculation shows that the "seats offered" in 2008 till now is 2102.

which is 90 more than the 2007 useat offer" figure of 2012. More lists are awaited as the admission process is.

still in progress. Such motivated spread of confusion with numbers must be condemned..

The Real Dangers Of Such Motivated Mischief.

While politicking might have inspired SFI to indulge in such games, it has real dangers. Firstly, implementation of.

legally mandated reservation and concomitant seat increase demands that all calculations must be done on the basis.

of intake {base year 2006) and not on the ever fluctuating numbers of seats offered. So, to interpret this year's.

admission process which has undertaken OBC reservation on the basis of "seats offered", as SFI is.

mischievously doing, is legally untenable and has real danger of inviting legal impediments from the anti-.

.

reservation forces. .

Secondly, to wrongly proJect some bloated figures as the actual seats in JNU is to fuel those anti-reservation forces in.

the campus who from the very beginning wanted to block and delay the implementation of the OBC reservation and.

undertaking these unethical moves. by quoting untenable figures is trying to fan a frenzy that can actually act agatnst the seat increase on the spurious plea that it will make the system "too big and thus unmanageable". SFI by.

the proper and speedy implementation of the reservation in JNU..

They are also helping to deflect attention from the real problems at hand that administration is putting time.

and again to scuttle the actual implementation of OBC reservation pertaining to correct application of relaxed.

eligibility criterion for OBC students. Interestingly, SFI is conspicuous by its total and calculated silence on.

this casteist elitist ploy of the administrations. This calculated silence, however, speaks volumes of their real.

motives. .

. .

We would also like to inform the student community that the ploy of the JNU administration to scuttle PH reservationshas been successfully rebuffed. An additional list of 31 PH students has been released on August 2, 2008..

However. the discrepancy on OBC reservations regarding the relaxation in the eligibility criterion . is yet to be resolved.

We call upon the JNU student community to rally behind JNUSU in ensuring proper implementation of OBC.

reservations, and stand up against JNU administration's casteist attempts to dilute the potential of OBC.

challenges at hand. .

reservations and at the same time to foil all other devious methods to deflect attention from the real.

Saudcep Pallavi Dcka.

Pn·sident, .JNUSU Md. Mobecn Alam.

Gen. Sen'-.. JNUSU .

.ft. .\'~.>c:r.. JNUSU .

.

Thank you to the prospective students and parents that visited Emory & Henry on Saturday for STEM and Church Leadership Fellows scholarship interviews. We enjoyed spending the day with you learning about our unique living and learning community, the admissions process, financial aid opportunities and more!

If you missed this weekend, schedule your interview with STEM or Church Leadership by contacting our Admissions Office at 800.848.5493 or email admission@ehc.edu. www.ehc.edu/visit