View allAll Photos Tagged unlearn
The Urban Farm School in Asheville, NC is for folks who are ready to walk their talk, grow their food, and learn how to be food independent in our cities. www.ashevillage.org/urban-farm-school
it looks like a large ladle to me, but they call it the big dipper... :) it aways amazes me that people once thought we where the center of the universe. i guess it is not that hard to believe, they once thought that the earth was flat!
i like stars, the universe, the cosmos. i am unlearned about them however. i have always enjoyed learning about them, watching them move throughout the sky. this time of year, you will see the dipper in a different position as the earth is moving more to the north for the winter season. i have always loved seeing how many stars there are in the sky. it is awesome to me to think that we have not found the outside of the universe..... what is on the outside?
here we are on earth a tiny blip on the scale of the cosmos, and we are a tiny blip on the scale of the earth. why do we always think that MY needs are more or greater than anything else? the lights to the north west are Cheyenne, all of those watts of light trying to pollute my image are hardly seen from the upper atmosphere, much less from the moon. we are nothing compared, but how awesome is the human body?? the vastness all the way down to what holds our cells together is simply amazing. it is time to slow down and look around!! AWESOME!
this image, not so awesome, but i like the big dipper. haha
As they say, you have to first unlearn to learn. Most of the bokeh photos have an anchor point for the focus, I blindly believed that anchor point is a must to get those de-focused bokeh rings.
Suddenly you realise that you are missing the fundamental truth about the bokeh, that is you need to have de-focused light source, that is all to it. Then taking the beautiful bokeh pictures reduces to the following simple steps.
- Set the biggest aperture
- Put the lens in manual focus mode
- De-focus on the light source, depends on the asthetics.
- Take pictures
Intersting light sources make interesting bokeh pictures, the above one is that of backlights of the vechicles stuck at traffic.
From Portraits of the Nineties by E. T. Raymond (1921)
CHAPTER XXVI
CHARLES HADDON SPURGEON—WILLIAM BOOTH
I have remarked in another place that the man who takes his religion too seriously stands suspect of not quite believing in it. Those who are never troubled with doubts are prone to a wild hilarity which often exposes them to the charge of irreverence and coarse handling of sacred things. Since Nonconformity has widened, and new theologies have been propounded, it has become almost oppressively refined. When it was very narrow and dogmatic, and assured of itself, its chief exponents were often condemned as vulgar people. They were not really vulgar; they were only so much on terms with their belief that they could take liberties with it and all things.
Charles Haddon Spurgeon was a man of that type. He was an unlearned man, and if he had been learned it is not at all likely that he would have been a profound or exact thinker; it is much more probable that he would have been dulled into mere mediocrity. But if he did not know much of bookish things, he knew a good deal about things in general, and he knew (or thought he knew) absolutely one thing in particular, namely, that he was right in his conception of the purpose of Providence. It was this certitude, rather than any ingrained coarseness, that made him so boisterous and rollicking in his dealings with the most solemn subjects. He looked on “soul-saving” with the same sense of reality that a bricklayer looks on bricklaying, and he joked about[261] it as a bricklayer jokes when anything funny is suggested to him by an incident in his work.
Spurgeon did not survive long into the Nineties, but his influence did not altogether cease to count till the end of the decade. By the new century it was dying, and to-day it is dead—at any rate, so far as the high places of Nonconformity are concerned. The name Spurgeon is Dutch, and the great preacher was a Hollander in his remote origin; he descended from a refugee who came to this country to escape the Alva persecution. Spurgeon’s father was an Independent Minister, and he himself was “converted” by the Primitive Methodists, but at an early age he embraced the Baptist faith, and he preached as a Baptist his first sermon, delivered at sixteen, in a Cambridgeshire cottage. His family wished him to have some sort of “college” education, but he went his own way, believing then as always that practical work in “soul-saving” was more important than scholarship.
He was little more than a boy when he gained fame as a London preacher, addressing congregations of ten thousand at the Surrey Music Hall before the Metropolitan Tabernacle was built for him. His style was then very theatrical: a foreign scoffer remarked that his denunciations of the stage must have been prompted by jealousy, since he was himself so consummate an actor. In later years he relied less on meretricious effects and more on his essential earnestness, but to the end he took any liberties that occurred to him with his subject or his audience. In other respects he changed little or nothing. Through all the Darwinian controversy he remained unmoved by the arguments which flurried so many theological dovecotes. “Huxley and Darwin,” he would say, “can go to—their ancestors the monkeys,” and he would pause wickedly after the “to” for his congregation to titter. With the Higher Criticism, as[262] with evolution, he would have no truck whatever. But against the Church he had no particular feeling; he read the Anglican divines much as another man might read Confucius, thinking them curious and interesting people from whom something might be learned. To the students of the Camberwell College, indeed, he recommended a book of Anglican sermons. Its author, he said, had been a parson, still worse a bishop, but despite these grave disadvantages had been a worthy and able man. In later years he even withdrew from the Liberation Society, apparently because he felt that his fellow-Dissenters were on the whole readier than the Church to fall in with what he called “down-grade” tendencies in biblical criticism. For the same reason he even withdrew from the Baptist Union. “If,” he said, “you preach what is new, it will not be true; if you preach what is true, it will not be new.” For Rome, Spurgeon never pretended tolerance. When another Baptist owned that during a visit to France he had been present at the Mass, and “had never felt nearer the presence of God,” Spurgeon replied that it was a good illustration of the text, “If I make my bed in hell, behold, Thou art there.” It was, no doubt, his hatred of Rome that led him in 1886 to become a Liberal Unionist.
His Radicalism, however, had always been of a peculiar kind. He did not believe in “trusting the people,” since most of the people were miserable sinners. He was not a Pacifist. “Turn the other cheek,” he used to say, “but if that is smitten too, another law comes in; you must either go for your man or get away from him.” It was long, also—not, indeed, until he grew gouty—before he could be got to adhere to the teetotal movement, while he simply jeered at an anti-tobacco crusade. Spurgeon himself liked a good cigar; was in no way an ascetic; lived in style at Norwood, and used to drive to the[263] Tabernacle in a turnout which would have done credit to a stockbroker. On the other hand, he was the unrelenting foe of the theatre, and he denounced dancing as having cost the first Baptist his head. There was, indeed, in him a great deal more of the old hard-headed than of the new soft-hearted Puritan. His only departure from the seventeenth century was in the matter of his jocularity. It was natural with him—perhaps an inheritance from some jovial Hollander of the Jan Steen type—but it was also carefully cultivated. He kept an immense library of funny books to draw on for pulpit use, and was never more carelessly happy in the telling of a story than when he had studied it in all its bearings the night before. He never hesitated to use slang when it seemed to him effective; witness the following:
“It is always best to go where God sends you. Jonah thought he would go to Tarshish instead of Nineveh, but when the whale got hold of him he was sucked in.”
“Though you are teetotallers you must all come to your bier at last.”
“To some people Bible reading is like flea-catching; they pick up a thought here and there, hold it between finger and thumb, and then hop on somewhere else.”
“Seek to possess both unction and gumption.”
These sentences were addressed to candidates for the Baptist ministry. It is noteworthy that in such Spurgeon always assumed a lack of refinement—an assumption which would be hotly resented by the Nonconformist student of to-day. Especially irritating would be his advice never to drop an aspirate; to the importance of the initial “H” he was continually reverting. In deeper matters he was insistent on eternal punishment; to question hell was to question the Scripture. But he used to say that no doubt God would show “every consideration” to[264] those predestined to damnation—how he never explained in detail. He would have been very angry with feminism if it had been an important thing in his day; woman, he thought, should be kept in her place; and he despised the man who was swayed by his wife. He was fond of pointing out that most of the troubles of the Hebrew patriarchs could be traced to their too much marriage.
And the rest of the acts of Charles Haddon Spurgeon, the wideawake that he wore, the clerical coat that he would not wear, the puns and money that he made, the stones that he weighed, and the spiritual bread that he dispensed, the sermons that he preached, the 30,000 printed copies a week that he sold, the men that he knew, those that he consorted with, and those that he assailed mightily—are they not written in chronicles of Nonconformity? In due time Charles Haddon Spurgeon died, and was gathered to his fathers, and nobody reigned in his stead, and of the mighty house that he did not build nothing is written anywhere, for, with all his brightness and breeziness and firm faith and sturdiness and trite common sense, he lacked all the qualities that go to the building of anything but a reputation. He had a voice, and after that little.
GENERAL BOOTH.
(From a portrait by J. McLure Hamilton.)
But for just that which Spurgeon wanted William Booth would have been another Spurgeon. But to his faith and enthusiasm he joined something not at all common among religious enthusiasts in this country. His heart was a chaos of crude and uncontrolled emotionalism, but he had the head of a ruler. It is a common reproach against English Protestantism that it does not understand how to harness spiritual energy. Of that art William Booth was a master, and in more favouring circumstances he would probably have been included in the list of founders of mighty religious orders. It is tempting[265] to speculate what might have been the present position of the Salvation Army had Booth, who was brought up as a member of the Church of England, and had certainly no enmity to that Church, been encouraged to pursue his work within its communion. Left to himself, he was unable to provide his organisation with that firm philosophical basis which seems a necessary condition of permanence in a religious society. He could invent a hierarchy, but he had to borrow a theology; and the raggedness of his dogmatic formation was in pathetic contrast with the splendid “dressing” of his human cohorts. He could offer a dram to the spiritually fainting, but man cannot live by stimulants alone, and the Salvation Army had little more in the way of spiritual nutriment to offer those who began to hunger for something more solid. Its only expedient was to join the excitement of definite work to that of cloudy religion. The Army tended even in Booth’s lifetime to become more and more an organ of social endeavour and less and less a definitely Christian thing; it was in its lay and not in its religious character that it won during the Nineties the goodwill of countless excellent pagans, and was patronised by precisely the same sort of people who had at first assailed it as the blasphemous travesty of a sect.
“A bawling, fanatical, send-round-the-hatical, pick-up-the-pence old pair.” So were Booth and his devoted wife described by Truth in the early Eighties. Fifteen years later the old “General,” now a widower, was never mentioned in a reputable paper without profound respect. The inverted commas had long disappeared, and even Royalty condescended to compliment him on his fine work for the “submerged tenth.” But all this recognition was really a sign of failure. Or, to put the matter less crudely, it was a sign that the secondary object of the Army had become more important than its primary aim. Booth[266] had set out first of all to save men’s souls, and some people threw cabbage stalks at him, while others flung him jeers and slanders. The applause only came when it was evident that, with the incidental disadvantage of brass bands and a crazy vocabulary of enthusiasm, the Army was very useful for distributing soup and getting firewood chopped.
Booth proved how thin are the partitions dividing the excess of democracy from autocratic rule. His government was at first purely paternal. When the family got too large for his personal rule he had to delegate authority, but every officer whom he put in a position of trust was given plenary power to the extent of his commission. “Government by talk” he had tried and put aside. “This method of work,” he said, “will never shake the Kingdom of the Devil”; and so he adopted the military system. In this he was probably only following the suggestion of his own imperious nature. But if he had been actuated by the deepest craft he could hardly have hit on a more certain method of keeping his converts together. Men and women care a great deal less for liberty than for domination; they will accept most cheerfully subordination for themselves if it affords them a present chance or a sure prospect of exercising despotic sway over others. “From the moment,” says Booth, “of our adopting the simple method of responsible and individual commands and personal obedience our whole campaign partook of a new character; in place of the hesitation and almost total want of progress from which we have been suffering, every development of the work leaped forward.” The brass band, the flag, and the red jersey probably had comparatively little to do with the Army’s success. These were useful to attract attention, and may perhaps have allured some simple-minded and very unæsthetic people. But apart from the deeper spiritual elements, the main[267] point, I imagine, was the fascination of authority. Comfortable people, accustomed to deference throughout life, have little conception of the hunger for respect which reigns among those who seldom get it. Indeed, half our social troubles would be over if the “better” classes could grasp the simple fact that the “lower” classes are much more sensitive than themselves on all points of dignity. To a mere factory hand, man or woman—it was a novelty of the Army that it put the sexes from the first on an exactly equal footing—it was luxury to put off insignificance with the work-day clothes and put on importance with the Army uniform. In the Booth hierarchy there was room for the pride of the wretched and the ambition of the destitute.
It was the great talent of Booth to put to use the most unlikely things. His use of vulgarity was very characteristic. The vulgarity of some other popular preachers of the time was a natural emanation. But Booth was not naturally vulgar; no man could be with such a profile. He had really fine manners; to a king he would talk as if he were an old king himself; and there was never a suggestion in his intercourse with the greatest either of bumptiousness or servility. The vulgarity of his methods was of set purpose, like St. Francis’s hostility to worldly culture, and, though it was at once common form to inveigh against the coarse profanities of a Salvation Army meeting, I have found highly sensitive people far less repelled by their wildest extravagances than by the much more ordinary irreverence of the regulation “revivalist.” It might not be true to say that while others vulgarised sacred things Booth sanctified vulgarity. But it is true that, if one might sometimes smile at his audacities, they never made one shudder.
In other conditions, as I have said, Booth might have won immortality as a saint of the Church. In[268] still other circumstances he might have been a most considerable statesman. His Darkest England is much more than a philanthropic manifesto. The schemes outlined in it for dealing with unemployment by training and emigration are eminently wise and practical, and, if it is permissible to indulge a regret that his great qualities were not available for the Church, it may also be suggested that something was lost by the failure of politicians to make fuller use of his remarkable insight and experience concerning social problems. The inspiration on these matters gradually passed from him to the Webbs. It was not, probably, a change for the better. For though Booth was quite hard-headed in these concrete matters, he had also that wisdom of the heart in which Fabianism was deficient. He would say, and quite justly, in reply to those who argued that the Army attracted people too lazy for regular work, and actually created a class of unemployables, that John Jones was outside in the street, without work or food, and something must be done for him at once; it was useless to wait for a social revolution. But he was under no illusions as to the nature of existing society. “There are many vices,” he wrote, “and seven deadly sins; but of late years many of the seven have contrived to pass themselves off as virtues. Avarice, for instance, and Pride, when re-baptised Thrift and Self-Respect, have become the guardian angels of Christian Civilisation, and as for Envy, it is the corner-stone upon which much of our competitive system is founded.” Again: “I am a strong believer in co-operation, but it must be co-operation based on the spirit of benevolence. I don’t see how any pacific readjustment of the social and economic relations between classes in this country can be effected except by the gradual substitution of co-operative associations for the present wages system.” Assuredly the man who wrote these things was something more than a fanatic.
[269]
Booth’s decision with regard to his children’s education was most typical of the man. Certain friends offered to pay the expenses of a University training for his eldest son. No, said Booth; he should enlist in the Army at an early age, and go through the usual Salvation training. Booth was not stupid, and could have had none of the stupid man’s contempt for education. But he seemed to be a little afraid of it, and from his own point of view who can say he had not reason? In the same spirit the Churchmen of the Renaissance fought against the teaching of Greek, not because they were all fools, but because some of them foresaw the dangers that actually followed. Booth was perhaps not wrong in suspecting that the higher education of his time, while making a man cocksure about things now debatable or disproved, would tend to make him dubious or indifferent about things which in his view permitted neither of incertitude nor of lukewarmness.
But if he hoped thus to secure to the thing he had made the vitality he had temporarily imparted to it, the hope was doomed to be disappointed. It could hardly be fulfilled, in any case, if the Army was to continue in isolation; for the Army was an order rather than a sect, with a discipline rather than a creed, and in the absence of its creator’s inspiration its tendency must have been to harden into formalism. That process had, indeed, begun even before the General’s death. It was suggested above that during the Nineties the Salvation Army was wounded by kindness. In the days of its persecution it was at least free; it had the feeling that it might just as well be hanged for a sheep as a lamb. But when the suburbs threw bouquets instead of stones the Salvationists found that the respect of the respectable is a chain. They were henceforth fettered. They could expand, but they could not change. The[270] movement was canalised and stereotyped; it had won recognition as a useful social adjunct, and it had to live up to its reputation. It became static in everything but its statistics. Gradually its tunes have grown old-fashioned; its uniforms are one with the tight military trouser and the bustled skirt; the War Cry is as definitely a paper with a past as Reynolds’s or the Referee. In its way the Army, no doubt, does as much good as ever. But the limits of that good are known. And it keeps nobody awake at night thinking of what might happen with the ferment of a revolutionary Christianity working among the English poor.
Booth was a great man of his kind—greater far than most of the Right Honourables and Right Reverends of his day—and it was a mighty thing that he built from defaced stones and nameless rubble rejected by all others. But he was too honest to fabricate a new religion, and a religious order implies a Church to order it.
"Exploring Race, Representation, and History in Children's Literature" This session for early childhood teachers, hosted by Teaching for Change's D.C. Area Educators for Social Justice and Project Unlearn on 1/26/2019, provided time for early childhood teachers to explore how to address issues of race, representation, and history in developmentally appropriate ways. The session was held at the beautiful Eaton Hotel in DC. Two children's books were provided to participants, courtesy of NMAAHC (where the session was originally scheduled) and donations from publishers. This session was in preparation for DC Black Lives Matter at School Week of Action. Learn more about the week of action here: www.dcareaeducators4socialjustice.org/black-lives-matter-...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=tw3b6sfbv6g
Today was a pretty day
No disappointments
No expectations on your whereabouts
And oh, did I let you go?
Did it finally show that strange things will happen if you let
them?
Today I didn't even try to hide
I'll stay here and never push things to the side
You can't reach me cause I'm way beyond you today
Today was a pretty day
Autumn comes with
These slight surprises where your life might twist and turn
Hope to unlearn
Strange things will happen
If you let them come around and stick around
Today I didn't even try to hide
I'll stay here and never push things to the side
Today I didn't even look to find
Something to put me in that peace of mind
You can't touch me cause I'm way beyond you today
PHILIPPINES: Womens College Corrects Gender Miseducation.
.
MANILA, Apr 16 , 2010 (IPS) - Flip open a typical textbook used in many Philippine schools and you will likely find images of women illustrating verbs such as cook or clean, but hardly appearing anywhere much in economics and history textbooks..
.
ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=51066
We expect our students to leap into the unkown, but how willing are we to take risks, to learn, unlearn, relearn--to put ourselves into cycles of "disruption and repair"? (http://www.amazon.com/Teaching-One-Moment-Time-Disruption/dp/1558494952)
155,000 items / 1,217,891 views
As a 56 year old man , who learnt photography about 12 years back I think Marziya has encapsulated my lifes struggle as a photographer in just a few lessons that she teaches me with my own camera..
What I unlearn is watching her subjects eyes as she shoots not one but all of them , she robs them of their inner feelings ..what are they thinking are they thinking what she s unthinking , her eyes are closed as she sees beyond the depth of the viewfinder , her frame is her own the click of the trigger is her own only her heartbeat belongs to the camera...
Yes Marziya creates poems in all her shots .. and this is the her playschool now relocated and this was the first time I accompanied her here in the absence of my wife who is in Damascus as close to Bibi Zainab as her thoughts could be.
So Marziyas street photography lessons began on this route on the very first day with me..through her lessons my own.
Read more about the following new books at Pesky LibraryThing
Taxes in America: What Everyone Needs to Know ... Leonard E. Burman, Joel Slemrod
The Amistad Rebellion ... Marcus Rediker
Unlearning Liberty ... Greg Lukianoff
Homo Mysterious ... David P. Barash, PhD
It is easier to blame others, when the result turns out to be what one expected.
We see the lonesome tree in the field, and we accept the fact that it somehow grew up alone there since no other tree cannot be grown(planted). And we similarly conclude this ancient-style chinese pagoda there alone pop out from the landscape.
Could all those be with accompany in the first place somehow since all these are done(build or grow) consciously?
We must learn to unlearn what we had learned which no longer fulfilled the meaning of learning any longer.
©2009 by João Paglione - all rights reserved
Visit my webpage www.joaopaglione.de to view images in larger resolution (full screen) or license them for editorial, commercial, or personal usage. Or e-mail me
What is rooted is easy to nourish.
What is recent is easy to correct.
What is brittle is easy to break.
What is small is easy to scatter.
Prevent trouble before it arises.
Put things in order before they exist.
The giant pine tree
grows from a tiny sprout.
The journey of a thousand miles
starts from beneath your feet.
Rushing into action, you fail.
Trying to grasp things, you lose them.
Forcing a project to completion,
you ruin what was almost ripe.
Therefore the Master takes action
by letting things take their course.
He remains as calm
at the end as at the beginning.
He has nothing,
thus has nothing to lose.
What he desires is non-desire;
what he learns is to unlearn.
He simply reminds people
of who they have always been.
He cares about nothing but the Tao.
Thus he can care for all things.
People who live in the society of performance are alienated, that is, separated by an authentic part of themselves that they unlearn to inhabit. This is why they enter the vicious cycle of producing and constantly enjoying the content. The continuous race to the accumulation of performance is a drug more and more addictive, but it never makes you feel the fullness of life, the wonder, the sense. How much space is there in our daily life for intimacy, silence, contemplation?
Maura Gancitano is a writer, philosopher and founder of Tlon (event agency, publishing house, theater bookshop, philosophy school). She holds many seminars and conferences concerning her researches about philosophy and imagination, inner search, gender education, literature and projects of innovative territorial liveability. She has published, among other things, essays such as "Malefica, trasformare la rabbia femminile" (Edizioni Tlon, 2016). And with Andrea Colamedici, "Tu non sei Dio. Fenomenologia della spiritualità contemporanea" (Edizioni Tlon, 2016), "Lezioni di Meraviglia. Viaggi tra filosofia e immaginazione" (Edizioni Tlon, 2017), "La società della performance. Come uscire dalla caverna" (Edizioni Tlon, 2018), and "Liberati della brava bambina. Otto storie per fiorire" (HarperCollins 2019).
Photo by Uiler Costa-Santos.
Indigenous, African, and European influences blend to create a unique culture within Brazil that includes religions like none other in the world. Afro-Brazilian religions have played an important contribution to Brazilian culture for generations; however, they are often pushed into the shadows and suffer from widespread misunderstanding, misrepresentation, and prejudice.
With practitioners of these religions forming a massive but disconnected community, Jayro Pereira de Jesus, Ashoka Fellow, saw an opportunity: organize across marginalized religious groups to not just gain the power to emerge into the mainstream, but to be able to demand respect. In a country dominated by European standards, these groups have often felt the pressure to uphold themselves to these standards in order to gain acceptance. According to Jayro, community is power. Through community building, practitioners unlearn these internalized attitudes and uplift their own culture as a moral compass.
The Afro-Brazilian religions with which Jayro works hold a distinct framework for problem solving than dominant Western religions. For example, there tends to be less of a dichotomy between good and evil within their belief systems. With these religions finally gaining the respect they deserve in the mainstream, Jayro is opening new pathways toward an Everyone A Changemaker world.
People who live in the society of performance are alienated, that is, separated by an authentic part of themselves that they unlearn to inhabit. This is why they enter the vicious cycle of producing and constantly enjoying the content. The continuous race to the accumulation of performance is a drug more and more addictive, but it never makes you feel the fullness of life, the wonder, the sense. How much space is there in our daily life for intimacy, silence, contemplation?
Maura Gancitano is a writer, philosopher and founder of Tlon (event agency, publishing house, theater bookshop, philosophy school). She holds many seminars and conferences concerning her researches about philosophy and imagination, inner search, gender education, literature and projects of innovative territorial liveability. She has published, among other things, essays such as "Malefica, trasformare la rabbia femminile" (Edizioni Tlon, 2016). And with Andrea Colamedici, "Tu non sei Dio. Fenomenologia della spiritualità contemporanea" (Edizioni Tlon, 2016), "Lezioni di Meraviglia. Viaggi tra filosofia e immaginazione" (Edizioni Tlon, 2017), "La società della performance. Come uscire dalla caverna" (Edizioni Tlon, 2018), and "Liberati della brava bambina. Otto storie per fiorire" (HarperCollins 2019).
People who live in the society of performance are alienated, that is, separated by an authentic part of themselves that they unlearn to inhabit. This is why they enter the vicious cycle of producing and constantly enjoying the content. The continuous race to the accumulation of performance is a drug more and more addictive, but it never makes you feel the fullness of life, the wonder, the sense. How much space is there in our daily life for intimacy, silence, contemplation?
Maura Gancitano is a writer, philosopher and founder of Tlon (event agency, publishing house, theater bookshop, philosophy school). She holds many seminars and conferences concerning her researches about philosophy and imagination, inner search, gender education, literature and projects of innovative territorial liveability. She has published, among other things, essays such as "Malefica, trasformare la rabbia femminile" (Edizioni Tlon, 2016). And with Andrea Colamedici, "Tu non sei Dio. Fenomenologia della spiritualità contemporanea" (Edizioni Tlon, 2016), "Lezioni di Meraviglia. Viaggi tra filosofia e immaginazione" (Edizioni Tlon, 2017), "La società della performance. Come uscire dalla caverna" (Edizioni Tlon, 2018), and "Liberati della brava bambina. Otto storie per fiorire" (HarperCollins 2019).
Maud Muller
MAUD Muller, on a summer’s day,Raked the meadow sweet with hay.
Beneath her torn hat glowed the wealthOf simple beauty and rustic health.
Singing, she wrought, and her merry gleeThe mock-bird echoed from his tree.
But when she glanced to the far-off town,White from its hill-slope looking down,
The sweet song died, and a vague unrestAnd a nameless longing filled her breast,—
A wish that she hardly dared to own,For something better than she had known.
The Judge rode slowly down the lane,Smoothing his horse’s chestnut mane.
He drew his bridle in the shadeOf the apple-trees to greet the maid,
And ask a draught from the spring that flowedThrough the meadow across the road.
She stooped where the cool spring bubbled up,And filled for him her small tin cup,
And blushed as she gave it, looking downOn her feet so bare, and her tattered gown.
“Thanks!” said the Judge; “a sweeter draughtFrom a fairer hand was never quaffed.”
He spoke of the grass and flowers and trees,Of the singing birds and the humming bees;
Then talked of the haying, and wondered whetherThe cloud in the west would bring foul weather.
And Maud forgot her brier-torn gownAnd her graceful ankles bare and brown;
And listened, while a pleased surpriseLooked from her long-lashed hazel eyes.
At last, like one who for delaySeeks a vain excuse, he rode away.
Maud Muller looked and sighed: “Ah me!That I the Judge’s bride might be!
“He would dress me up in silks so fine,And praise and toast me at his wine.
“My father should wear a broadcloth coat;My brother should sail a painted boat.
“I’d dress my mother so grand and gay,And the baby should have a new toy each day.
“And I’d feed the hungry and clothe the poor,And all should bless me who left our door.”
The Judge looked back as he climbed the hill,And saw Maud Muller standing still.
“A form more fair, a face more sweet,Ne’er hath it been my lot to meet.
“And her modest answer and graceful airShow her wise and good as she is fair.
“Would she were mine, and I to-day,Like her, a harvester of hay:
“No doubtful balance of rights and wrongs,Nor weary lawyers with endless tongues,
“But low of cattle and song of birds,And health and quiet and loving words.”
But he thought of his sisters proud and cold,And his mother vain of her rank and gold.
So, closing his heart, the Judge rode on,And Maud was left in the field alone.
But the lawyers smiled that afternoon,When he hummed in court an old love-tune;
And the young girl mused beside the well,Till the rain on the unraked clover fell.
He wedded a wife of richest dower,Who lived for fashion, as he for power.
Yet oft, in his marble hearth’s bright glow,He watched a picture come and go;
And sweet Maud Muller’s hazel eyesLooked out in their innocent surprise.
Oft, when the wine in his glass was red,He longed for the wayside well instead;
And closed his eyes on his garnished roomsTo dream of meadows and clover-blooms.
And the proud man sighed, with a secret pain,“Ah, that I were free again!
“Free as when I rode that day,Where the barefoot maiden raked her hay.”
She wedded a man unlearned and poor,And many children played round her door.
But care and sorrow, and childbirth pain,Left their traces on heart and brain.
And oft, when the summer sun shone hotOn the new-mown hay in the meadow lot,
And she heard the little spring brook fallOver the roadside, through the wall,
In the shade of the apple-tree againShe saw a rider draw his rein.
And, gazing down with timid grace,She felt his pleased eyes read her face.
Sometimes her narrow kitchen wallsStretched away into stately halls;
The weary wheel to a spinet turned,The tallow candle an astral burned,
And for him who sat by the chimney lug,Dozing and grumbling o’er pipe and mug,
A manly form at her side she saw,And joy was duty and love was law.
Then she took up her burden of life again,Saying only, “It might have been.”
Alas for maiden, alas for Judge,For rich repiner and household drudge!
God pity them both! and pity us all,Who vainly the dreams of youth recall.
For of all sad words of tongue or pen,The saddest are these: “It might have been!”
Ah, well! for us all some sweet hope liesDeeply buried from human eyes;
And, in the hereafter, angels mayRoll the stone from its grave away!
John Greenleaf Whittier
We do not know where death awaits us:
So let us wait for it everywhere.
To practice death is to practice freedom.
A man who has learned how to die
Has unlearned how to be a slave.
~ Michel de Montaigne
Day 359 - Thursday, January 16th. I've been listening to a lot of records lately and they've been inspiring lots of photos. I really love the translucent green vinyl of this record and the fact that you can see the name on the turntable mat. The record by the way is one of my favs - Snapcase's Progression Through Unlearning.
Photo by Uiler Costa-Santos.
Indigenous, African, and European influences blend to create a unique culture within Brazil that includes religions like none other in the world. Afro-Brazilian religions have played an important contribution to Brazilian culture for generations; however, they are often pushed into the shadows and suffer from widespread misunderstanding, misrepresentation, and prejudice.
With practitioners of these religions forming a massive but disconnected community, Jayro Pereira de Jesus, Ashoka Fellow, saw an opportunity: organize across marginalized religious groups to not just gain the power to emerge into the mainstream, but to be able to demand respect. In a country dominated by European standards, these groups have often felt the pressure to uphold themselves to these standards in order to gain acceptance. According to Jayro, community is power. Through community building, practitioners unlearn these internalized attitudes and uplift their own culture as a moral compass.
The Afro-Brazilian religions with which Jayro works hold a distinct framework for problem solving than dominant Western religions. For example, there tends to be less of a dichotomy between good and evil within their belief systems. With these religions finally gaining the respect they deserve in the mainstream, Jayro is opening new pathways toward an Everyone A Changemaker world.