View allAll Photos Tagged study
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. If you are interested in using my images please contact me. View on black.
www.annemcgrathphotography.co.uk/
© 2014 Anne McGrath
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. If you are interested in using my images please contact me. View on black.
www.annemcgrathphotography.co.uk/
© 2013 Anne McGrath
“Walnuts have a shell, and they have a kernel. Religions are the same. They have an essence, but then they have a protective coating. This is not the only way to put it. But it’s my way. So the kernels are the same. However, the shells are different.” ~ Huston Smith
Huston Cummings Smith (May 31, 1919 – December 30, 2016) was an influential scholar of religious studies in the United States. He authored at least thirteen books on world's religions and philosophy.
Im Dezember letzten Jahres habe ich mit der Serie "Phaeno Study" begonnen - und ich habe immer noch einiges davon auf der Platte. Heute gibt es einmal kein Langzeitbelichtungsfoto, sondern eine "normale Aufnahme". Ich hoffe, es gefällt trotzdem!
Sleep Study, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, April 27, 2023
Sleep Study was not as restful as I had hoped it would be. Just before I attempted to go to sleep, I took this picture from the window.
Explore 22 Sept 2023. #379
© All Rights Reserved. Please do not use this image on websites, blogs or other media without my prior permission.
Highest Explore Position #288 Oct 30th 2008.
Thanks everyone for the awesome inspiration provided by your wonderful comments, awards and invitation......I am indeed humbled. Thank you very much.
7560 2017 07 25 001 file
Art Class Study material explored.
An Art Class Study presented
by Matthew D. Hughes
Leslie Powell Foundation Art Gallery
Three surfaces - dark, mid and pale - under the same beam.
The dark surface swallows the light, the mid-toned keeps it in balance and the pale one returns it almost entirely, making it clear that the journey of light is shaped by the shades it meets.
Hello my dear friends :)
I wanted to share this work with you.... unfortunatly i didn´t draw too much this year (btw, one of the oddest years of my life) but still wanted to be present .
In honor of MLK today, a study on all the colors in my palette and the beauty each one presents. <3
bokeh
15.365
A few miles downstream from Niagara Falls are these amazing class 6 whitewater rapids, see link for video.
It's nice to see Toby finally applying himself.
Wait... what's that he's studying???
Our Daily Challenge - July 7, 2021 - "Directions"
Daily Dog Challenge - 3503. 7/13 "Three"
100x in 2021 - #44
365:2021 - #194
You probably thought what I did: If I post to an award group that requires 3 awards, then I should expect 3 awards, on average. Obviously, any given photo will get more or less, but you figure on average you should get as much as you give, right? WRONG!!
I’ve done a systematic study of how many awards the different award groups give out, and the bottom line is this: The half of Flickrites who do actually give out rewards get nothing in return from the other half of the Flickrites who post and run.
If you’re posting and running, shame on you. If you’re posting and being honest, then you should check out the list below to see which award groups are best and worst.
Details of the study are below; I welcome any data that the group admins wish to share, or from anyone would like to validate these findings. I realize my sample is small and would like to get more data...
-----------
Purpose: Do you get as many rewards as you give in Flickr award groups?
Method: Sample 20 Flickr award groups. Go to page 24 and count the number of awards given to the first 12 pictures; this is deep enough in the pool that awards have stopped, but not so deep that many images have been pulled. I validated a sample of 12 was sufficient.
Result: From a total sample of 240 images posted to award groups, you get 59% of the awards you give out, or roughly you have to give two awards in order to get one. There is huge variation amongst the groups, as you’ll see in table below.
Discussion: At a practical level, it appears that there are two things that contribute to a higher percentage of reciprocity. First, group cohesion makes a difference—for example Shining Star has a relatively higher percentage because many of the members are contacts with each other. Second, a mechanical pool sweeper, if properly used, makes a HUGE difference, e.g. Global Village 2 and Flickr Hearts. The results also show that there are lots of Flickrites who don’t play by the rules. In the case of group awards, without a pool sweeper there is absolutely no penalty for posting and running because there’s no way to get caught.
Group averages… For example, A+++ has 70%, meaning that for every A+++ award you give, you get 0.7 back… Some of the averages are above 100% because of sampling error, and because of multiple invites.
My Winners, 116%
Better Than Good, 116%
Global Village 2, 110%
Flickr Hearts, 88%
A+++, 70%
The Other Village, 70%
Shining Star, 68%
Music to My Eyes, 64%
Dragon Fly, 63%
Flickr Stars (newer one), 62%
Flickr Rose, 60%
Flickr Special, 56%
Perfect Photographer, 40%
Abstract Art Awards, 40%
Photographers Gone Wild, 37%
Peoples Choice, 37%
Colour Art Awards, 30%
Eperke, 24%
Flickr Stars (older one), 20%
I Think This is Art, 7%
(Explore)