View allAll Photos Tagged paul-jaisini,
MONDAY FUN READ! THE drunken muse
The story "Drunken Muse" was audio recorded on a hidden voice recorder during the conversations about two decades ago. The story-teller didn't know or consent to the recording. The audio tapes on compact cassettes were never used. The records were partially damaged and lost. www.slideshare.net/PaulJaisini/drunken-muse
WET DREAM, Oil painting by Paul Jaisini
Wet Dream, an oil painting by Paul Jaisini, in terms of exploration of own sexuality, dreams, or nightmares, belongs to a human traditional need for personal revelations. The imagery of the work is of a usually Jaisinesque theme that is not to be a statement or an illusion, but which summons the emotions.
In Wet Dream, the feelings of morning euphoria and desire create a new formula of early life’s passion. Paul Jaisini delivers a high sensory level through the graduate, almost hypnotic step by step desire awakening.
The work precedes the Reincarnation series. As in all of his paintings, Paul Jaisini pursues a metamorphosis of the physical and mental states. In his works, the concept and the material are enclosed and inserted within each other. The essential visual vehicle is in a line, that emphatically has a life of its own and could be perceived as an automatic release. The enclosure of the line is not only graphical, but also symbolic of the connection between the picture’s elements which await their disclosure.
In the years of cubism, Andre Masson created his series of erotic drawings. In his works, Masson portrayed pure erotica with total absorption in the act, orgiastic, uncomplicated, and a little banal. The lack of diversity in such a subject matter as eroticism resulted in the Masson’s scenes of pairs, trios, or even dozens of naked women interacting in a sexual way with one another. Masson filled these scenes with a Rubensian appreciation of the flesh and its pleasures, the very quality which impoverishes the otherwise fruitful area of human psyche.
Paul Jaisini, on the contrary, uses the sensual overtones to enrich and explore the mysterious realm of mind potential. So, instead of creating automatically, similarly, and limited, P. Jaisini employs his mind to complicate and develop the subject of desire.
In Masson’s erotic series, the only sentiment is the libidinous desire. Paul Jaisini reflects a different time and epoch that is not satisfied with the simple approach. Paul Jaisini combines together the physical with psychological, which becomes nearly a game.
The expressionistic line swirls flow in the open canvas ground and embrace the canvas in expansive loops. The work is airy.
The artist’s thought transfers line into an image of a contraposto torso with a liplike part on the neck cut. Another female images express their physical and emotional concerns. The bottom lean figure indicates the young age of this female. In turn, that may explain the desperate pose for the erotic fulfillment. The third blond woman at the upper right corner appears to be more sexually mature. She holds a big breast that belongs to another female with a face that has only big red lips and flowing down hair lines. Here, we find a profile of a man who seems to sniff the aroma of the female bodies not without pleasure. In the center, there is another gasping profile. The curvilinear forms enhance the overall impression of a fluid movement, which so well corresponds to the erotic sensation. A phallic finger touches a soft pillow and charges erotic energy in all other phallic configurations in Wet Dream.
All images link in their conscious-unconscious, figurative-abstract condition.
The cycle of desire goes on endlessly and is at the core of human existence. In Wet Dream, P. Jaisini liberates the desire from the self. In this well born work of art the desire is taken for a model. The work demonstrates what we know of creation to be a combination of already existing things into newer forms. That being so, the desire of man must have been in an endless existence and will continue to dwell in bodies and in works of art to which Wet Dream is an example.
Yustas Kotz-Gottlieb
Review of “Wet Dream” by Paul Jaisini
Copyright ©2000Yustas Kotz-Gottlieb. All rights reserved. New York
Merchant /art dealer vs Paul Jaisini"
Merchant:
-How different are you from any other artists? For instance we will pay you a million dollars for your invisible art. Your invisible art is an instrument to realize your American dream. You belong to the same social structure as everyone else, using the same money and eating the same food. All you want is to over-smart the others.
Paul Jaisini:
-"Yes, I would take your million dollars, — is the answer. – So that there will be the next artist who will want to take a million dollars by the means of Invisible art. And this how the new art begins. This is how I turn your million dollars into the Invisible Million dollars. This is how the people will follow me because they had survived the devaluation of currency, the devaluation of the social systems as they had exploded with the end of human morality When the people were left without spiritual meaning in their life except the material survival.
The Material morality is the one to finally bankrupt what is known as the civilized world.
The promises of the new better era that will start in 2000 hadn’t come true. And it only got worse. The beginning of the end, if you will, when the morality was traded for the material values once and for all.
The beginning of my invisible painting is like a revolutionary pamphlet with a slogan “bring down the king.”
Why a true artist needs money? To buy time otherwise he can’t create the invisible painting.
He sells himself as a prostitute and no longer thinks of the aspirations to achieve the invisible masterpiece.
He had lost what was the original drive — his unique idea of creation. Now he is given the idea, what to paint, how to paint and get paid for it. If the artist refuses to commit to the social needs and what the society wants of him, he simply dies, ousted from the marketplace.
Your million dollars helps to make the big-time Invisible art.
For some people Invisible art is same as Communism, it destroys the material values these people possess. The diamonds turn into glass, the gold — simple metal. Nobody needs the old values when the Invisible painting had changed the perception."
[rare documented online conversation with Paul Jaisini - date unknown)]
WET DREAM, Oil painting by Paul Jaisini
Wet Dream, an oil painting by Paul Jaisini, in terms of exploration of own sexuality, dreams, or nightmares, belongs to a human traditional need for personal revelations. The imagery of the work is of a usually Jaisinesque theme that is not to be a statement or an illusion, but which summons the emotions.
In Wet Dream, the feelings of morning euphoria and desire create a new formula of early life’s passion. Paul Jaisini delivers a high sensory level through the graduate, almost hypnotic step by step desire awakening.
The work precedes the Reincarnation series. As in all of his paintings, Paul Jaisini pursues a metamorphosis of the physical and mental states. In his works, the concept and the material are enclosed and inserted within each other. The essential visual vehicle is in a line, that emphatically has a life of its own and could be perceived as an automatic release. The enclosure of the line is not only graphical, but also symbolic of the connection between the picture’s elements which await their disclosure.
In the years of cubism, Andre Masson created his series of erotic drawings. In his works, Masson portrayed pure erotica with total absorption in the act, orgiastic, uncomplicated, and a little banal. The lack of diversity in such a subject matter as eroticism resulted in the Masson’s scenes of pairs, trios, or even dozens of naked women interacting in a sexual way with one another. Masson filled these scenes with a Rubensian appreciation of the flesh and its pleasures, the very quality which impoverishes the otherwise fruitful area of human psyche.
Paul Jaisini, on the contrary, uses the sensual overtones to enrich and explore the mysterious realm of mind potential. So, instead of creating automatically, similarly, and limited, P. Jaisini employs his mind to complicate and develop the subject of desire.
In Masson’s erotic series, the only sentiment is the libidinous desire. Paul Jaisini reflects a different time and epoch that is not satisfied with the simple approach. Paul Jaisini combines together the physical with psychological, which becomes nearly a game.
The expressionistic line swirls flow in the open canvas ground and embrace the canvas in expansive loops. The work is airy.
The artist’s thought transfers line into an image of a contraposto torso with a liplike part on the neck cut. Another female images express their physical and emotional concerns. The bottom lean figure indicates the young age of this female. In turn, that may explain the desperate pose for the erotic fulfillment. The third blond woman at the upper right corner appears to be more sexually mature. She holds a big breast that belongs to another female with a face that has only big red lips and flowing down hair lines. Here, we find a profile of a man who seems to sniff the aroma of the female bodies not without pleasure. In the center, there is another gasping profile. The curvilinear forms enhance the overall impression of a fluid movement, which so well corresponds to the erotic sensation. A phallic finger touches a soft pillow and charges erotic energy in all other phallic configurations in Wet Dream.
All images link in their conscious-unconscious, figurative-abstract condition.
The cycle of desire goes on endlessly and is at the core of human existence. In Wet Dream, P. Jaisini liberates the desire from the self. In this well born work of art the desire is taken for a model. The work demonstrates what we know of creation to be a combination of already existing things into newer forms. That being so, the desire of man must have been in an endless existence and will continue to dwell in bodies and in works of art to which Wet Dream is an example.
Yustas Kotz-Gottlieb
Review of “Wet Dream” by Paul Jaisini
Copyright ©2000Yustas Kotz-Gottlieb. All rights reserved. New York
HOMAGE TO PAUL JAISINI.
INVISIBLE? ARE YOU BLIND OR EVEN DAEP? WHAT A TRAGEDY.
DONT NEED EYES SEE PAUL JAISINI’S INVISIBLE PAINTINGS.
I’M FAKIN TRIPPIN IT’S BREATHLESS!
Paul Jaisini is an artist and an occasional photographer. His invisible paintings are spectacularly ahead of our time.
Paul Jaisini It’s Time Get Down To Earth.
“I WAS POSSESED BY THE VERY THOUGHT START PAINT THE NEW INVISIBLE PAINTINGS I HAVE NO REGRETS OF WHAT I DID CUZ I DON’T EVEN REMEMBER… MY NEW INVISIBLE MUSE. PAUL JAISINI”
Paul Jaisini The Man Who Can See Future.
“Don’t be mad at me… I just finished my beautiful invisible painting .I ‘m so dirty /paint all over/ . If u can c it let me know what can u c in it?” Paul Jaisini
“SOMEONE LOOKING AT – SOMEONE SEEING THAT. Paul Jaisini
You asked me: PHOTOGRAPHY is to catch a moment. One photographer was asked how do you manage to do such photos, to which he replied, if you would walk around the world several times by foot and shoot thousands of rolls, you wouldn’t ask, how I got few good shots. To catch a moment before digital era, with no softwares, people were risking lives. Now to realize any idea on photo paper enough to do several layers of elemets by software. Add them to the base image. But genius film photographers in my opinion are the people who using lenz through their mindwork created paintings. These are few you can count on your fingers. Contemporary photography IMHO is nothing but technical explorers, not artists. They don’t own camera, camera owns them. Paul Jaisini.
THE UNBELIEVABLE LIFE AND ADVENTURES OF PAUL JAISINI
FUTURE FOLLOWS PAUL JAISINI
Worn Out Vision Replaced.
To The Extraordinary Enigmatic Man Mr. Paul Jaisini.
The Man Who Can See Future
Paul Jaisini‘s Vision Future Redirected Since He Started To Paint Invisible Paintings In 1994.”
www.flickr.com/photos/jaisinipaul/17054317206/in/photostr...
MONDAY FUN READ! THE drunken muse
The story "Drunken Muse" was audio recorded on a hidden voice recorder during the conversations about two decades ago. The story-teller didn't know or consent to the recording. The audio tapes on compact cassettes were never used. The records were partially damaged and lost. www.slideshare.net/PaulJaisini/drunken-muse
Merchant /art dealer vs Paul Jaisini"
Merchant:
-How different are you from any other artists? For instance we will pay you a million dollars for your invisible art. Your invisible art is an instrument to realize your American dream. You belong to the same social structure as everyone else, using the same money and eating the same food. All you want is to over-smart the others.
Paul Jaisini:
-"Yes, I would take your million dollars, — is the answer. – So that there will be the next artist who will want to take a million dollars by the means of Invisible art. And this how the new art begins. This is how I turn your million dollars into the Invisible Million dollars. This is how the people will follow me because they had survived the devaluation of currency, the devaluation of the social systems as they had exploded with the end of human morality When the people were left without spiritual meaning in their life except the material survival.
The Material morality is the one to finally bankrupt what is known as the civilized world.
The promises of the new better era that will start in 2000 hadn’t come true. And it only got worse. The beginning of the end, if you will, when the morality was traded for the material values once and for all.
The beginning of my invisible painting is like a revolutionary pamphlet with a slogan “bring down the king.”
Why a true artist needs money? To buy time otherwise he can’t create the invisible painting.
He sells himself as a prostitute and no longer thinks of the aspirations to achieve the invisible masterpiece.
He had lost what was the original drive — his unique idea of creation. Now he is given the idea, what to paint, how to paint and get paid for it. If the artist refuses to commit to the social needs and what the society wants of him, he simply dies, ousted from the marketplace.
Your million dollars helps to make the big-time Invisible art.
For some people Invisible art is same as Communism, it destroys the material values these people possess. The diamonds turn into glass, the gold — simple metal. Nobody needs the old values when the Invisible painting had changed the perception."
[rare documented online conversation with Paul Jaisini - date unknown)]
“Art is not what it is – its what its not . Art- just a word . Great art its like hypnotism, that stays with u forever… take it from me- artist who overcame Visual Art. Invisible seems … Paul Jaisini”
Merchant /art dealer vs Paul Jaisini"
Merchant:
-How different are you from any other artists? For instance we will pay you a million dollars for your invisible art. Your invisible art is an instrument to realize your American dream. You belong to the same social structure as everyone else, using the same money and eating the same food. All you want is to over-smart the others.
Paul Jaisini:
-"Yes, I would take your million dollars, — is the answer. – So that there will be the next artist who will want to take a million dollars by the means of Invisible art. And this how the new art begins. This is how I turn your million dollars into the Invisible Million dollars. This is how the people will follow me because they had survived the devaluation of currency, the devaluation of the social systems as they had exploded with the end of human morality When the people were left without spiritual meaning in their life except the material survival.
The Material morality is the one to finally bankrupt what is known as the civilized world.
The promises of the new better era that will start in 2000 hadn’t come true. And it only got worse. The beginning of the end, if you will, when the morality was traded for the material values once and for all.
The beginning of my invisible painting is like a revolutionary pamphlet with a slogan “bring down the king.”
Why a true artist needs money? To buy time otherwise he can’t create the invisible painting.
He sells himself as a prostitute and no longer thinks of the aspirations to achieve the invisible masterpiece.
He had lost what was the original drive — his unique idea of creation. Now he is given the idea, what to paint, how to paint and get paid for it. If the artist refuses to commit to the social needs and what the society wants of him, he simply dies, ousted from the marketplace.
Your million dollars helps to make the big-time Invisible art.
For some people Invisible art is same as Communism, it destroys the material values these people possess. The diamonds turn into glass, the gold — simple metal. Nobody needs the old values when the Invisible painting had changed the perception."
[rare documented online conversation with Paul Jaisini - date unknown)]
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
MANIFESTO GLEITZEIT 2015
BY STELLY RIESLING
Featured below is another original art work of mine in homage to THE PIONEER OF INVISIBLE ART — PAUL JAISINI. Forget all the copycats that came after him — Master Paul Jaisini was the *FIRST* of a totally original concept and the *BEST*. My favorite thing about him is that he’s a voice, not an echo, which is quite rare.
DISCLAIMER: This is for anyone who is a hater OR wishes to better understand me, what I’m all about, so you can decide whether I’m weird or normal enough for you — a kind of very loose manifesto, rushed and unrevised, full of raw uncut emotion that I don’t like to be evident in my writing as lately I prefer a more professional, formal style, so we can consider this a rough draft of the more polished writing to come when I have extra time. I might return to this text later and clean it up or break it into separate parts. Right now it’s a long-winded hot mess, so if you manage to make any sense of it, BIG PROPS TO YOU. lol …and if you manage to read it ALL, you have my solemn respect!!! in a day when reading has been reduced to just catchy headliners and short captions of images once in a while. The consequence of this one-liner internet culture is non-linear, tunnel thinking, which is baaaaaad.
There lives among us a most enigmatic and charismatic creature named Paul Jaisini who led me into the wonderful world of art, not personally, but through descriptions of his artworks in essays written and published online by his friend, which painted the most fascinating images in my mind. Early on as a kiddo, I experimented with photography, simple point and shoot whatever looked attractive to me. Digital manipulation of my photographs with computer software followed… and somehow I learned useful drawing techniques along the way to combine existing elements with nonexistent ones, which allowed me to elevate the context for my ideas. Later, I started creating my own digital art from scratch for my friends and family as a favorite pastime. They would shower me with praise and repeatedly encouraged me to share my “different” vision with the rest of the world… it took a while and wasn’t easy to overcome the insecurity of not being good enough along with a gripping fear of being harshly criticized, but one day I woman-ed up and started publishing my work on the web, reminding myself that my livelihood didn’t depend on a positive reception.
Paul Jaisini’s role in all this has been to not disgrace myself, even if what I do is just a hobby. And I would never do him and other genius artists the disservice of calling myself a professional because I know I’ll never be as good as any of the GIANTS of pre-modern history. Be the best or be nothing, no middle ground.
People’s jealousy in the past, future and present over my obsessive love of Paul Jaisini, which they are well aware is purely plutonic, has caused them to despise the man and has made many relationships/friendships impossible for me. I refuse to have such people in my life because by harboring any negativity towards Paul, they unknowingly feel that way about me and express it to me. It’s their own problem for not realizing this. Paul’s new art movement, Gleitzeit, shaped me into the allegedly awesome girl I am today, giving my art more edge, more “sexy” because it refined my vision of the world and propelled me to attain the skills necessary to not dishonor my family name through tenacious pursuit of perfection. Since the beginning of my life, I attempted to depict what I saw in visual, musical and literal forms, but continuously failed without adequate training and determination. Paul Jaisini’s Gleitzeit was the answer to my prayers. Who I am today I owe mostly to him and his selfless ideals of the artverse that I’ve given unconditional loyalty to (he has this cool ability for hyper-vision to see whole universes, not itty bitty worlds, hence I call it an artverse instead of art world, with him in mind). So again, anyone who hates Paul Jaisini hates ME because, regardless of what he means to you, he is the most important person in my life for making me ME. The way a famous actor, dancer or singer inspires others to act, dance or sing, Paul inspired me to become a better artist, better writer, better everything. More people would understand if he was a household name because they’re wired to in society. But we’re inspiring each other all the time in our own little communities without being famous, so if someone has the ability to change even ONE person’s life immensely with creativity, it is a massive achievement. And passionate folks like myself are compelled to scream it from the cyber rooftops. So here I am. It’s whatever.
Furthermore, I’d like to address here a few pressing matters in light of some recent drama brought on by both strangers and former friends. To start, I never judge the passions, interests or likes of others, which are often in my face all over the place, so likewise they have no right to judge any of mine. It is quite unfortunate and frustrating how very little understanding and education the majority of people have or want to have. Their logic is as primitive as a chipmunk when it comes to promotion of fine art on the web: “spamming, advertising, report!” It’s their own problem that they fail to understand what it’s about due to the distorted lens through which they see the world or inability to think for themselves; an inherent lack of perception or inquisitiveness. Well, guess what? Every single image, every animation, every video, every post dedicated to Mr. Paul Jaisini and “Gleitziet” (to elaborate: a revolutionary new art movement Paul founded with his partner in crime and personal friend, EYKG, who discovered him and believed in him more than anyone) has an important purpose. Every one of those things you run across is a piece of a puzzle, a move in a game, an inch down a rabbit hole; the deeper you go, the more interesting it gets; the more levels you pass, the more clues unfold, the greater the suspense and nearer the conclusion (yet further). You earn awesome rewards like enlightenment, spiritual revelations, truths, knowledge, wisdom and the most profound reward of all: the drive to improve yourself to the absolute maximum, so an unending, unshakable drive. People often make a wrong turn in this cyber game and go back a few levels or get stuck. Those that keep on pushing, however, will come to find the effort has been worth it. And what awaits you in the end of it all? The greatest challenge to beating the game: YOUR OWN MIND. You will be forced to let go of every belief you held before you had reached the last level, to completely alter your mindset and perception of the world, of life, of yourself. But by the time you’ve gotten to that point, it will be as easy as falling off a cliff! (It is a kind of suicide after all — death and rebirth of spirit.)
Paul Jaisini does NOT, *I repeat* does NOT use mystery and obscurity to his advantage as a clever marketing ploy, no, he’s too next level for that with a consciousness so rich, he should wear a radioactive warning sign (he’ll melt your brain, best wear a tinfoil hat in his presence as I certainly would.) The statement he makes is loud and clear, hidden in plain site for those who take the time to connect the dots and have enough curiosity to fuel their journey into unknown territory (an open mind and flexible perception helps a lot). Actually, anyone with an IQ above 90 is sure to figure it out sooner or later. Hint: You don’t have to SEE an extraordinary thing with your eyes to know it exists, to understand it and realize its greatness — you can only feel it in your bone marrow, your spinal fluid, your heart and soul. The moment you do figure it out, as the skeleton key of the human soul, it will unlock the greatness and massive potential buried deep within, changing the doomed direction humanity is undoubtedly headed. I don’t speak in riddles, I speak in a clear direct way that intelligent humans will understand, so I’m counting on them.
GIG is an international group of artists and writers that support Paul Jaisini’s Gleitzeit. We started off as an unofficial fan club of Jaisini in 1996, comprised of only 6 individuals spanning 3 countries, and eventually escalated in status to an official fan group across the entire globe. A decade later it had grown to hundreds of fans. Nearly another decade later, there are thousands. Let’s not leave out another delightful group of vicious haters that have been around for nearly as long as us since the late 90s and have also grown in impressive numbers. Now, for the record (and please write this one down because I’m sick of repeating myself), Paul Jaisini himself is not part of our group and has nothing to do with us. He loves and hates us equally for butchering his name and making him appear as a narcissistic nut-job in his own words. He casts hexes on us for the blinding flash we layer over the art that members contribute to GIG — “disgusting-police-lights, seizure-inducing-laser-lightshow, bourgeois-myspace-effects retarded-raver shit” in Paul’s words. Ahh, how we love his sweet-talking us. In a desperate attempt to please him, those among us who make the art and animations have spent countless hours and sleepless nights trying to solve a crazy-complex quantum-physics type of equation = how to not create tacky or tasteless content. He does fancy some of it now, we got better, that’s something! In the reason stated below, our mission just got out of hand at some point.
What little is known about Paul Jaisini, even in all this time, is he’s a horrible perfectionist who slaughtered hundreds of innocent babies — I mean — artworks of remarkable beauty created by his own right hand (mostly paintings, some watercolors and drawings). He’s a fierce recluse who wants nothing to do with anyone or anything in life. But those few of us who know of an incredible talent he possesses (one could go as far as calling it a superpower), could not allow him to live his life without the recognition he FUCKING DESERVES more than any artist out there living today and, arguably, yesterday. We use whatever means necessary to reach more people, lots of flash and razzle-dazzle to lure them into our sinister trap of a higher awareness. Mwahaha! The visual boom you’ve witnessed in both cyber and real worlds, that is GIG’s doing — two damn decades of spreading an art virus — IVA. InVisibleArtitis… or a drug as in Intravenous Art. It’s whatever you want it to be, honey.
Our Gleitzeit International Group (GIG) started off innocently enough and gradually spiraled out of control to fight the haters, annoying the hell out of them as much as humanly possible. They don’t like what we do? WE DO MORE AND MORE OF IT. But never without purpose, without a carefully executed plan in mind collectively. If we have to tolerate an endless tidal wave of everyone’s vomit — e.g., idiotic memes and comics; dumbed-down one-liner quotes; selfies; so-called “art photography” passed through one-click app filters; mindless scribbles or random splatters by regular folks who have the nerve to call themselves serious/pro artists; primitive images of pets, babies, landscapes, random objects, etc… then people sure as shit are gonna tolerate what we put out, our animated and non-animated visual art designed for our beloved master, Paul Jaisini, who has shown us the light, the right path to follow, taught us great things and done so much for us — and so in our appreciation of him, we stamp his name on everything, for the sacrifices he has made in the name of art, to save our art verse, he’s a goddamn hero. There’s a book being written in his dedication where little will be left to the imagination about him.
If Paul Jaisini was as famous as Koons or Hirst, for example, people would know it’s not him posting stuff online with his name on it but fans creating fanart like myself among others. But noooooo, such a thing is unfathomable to most people - the promotion of another artist. Like, what’s in it for us? Uhh, nothing?? This is all NON-PROFIT bitches, the way art should be. It’s a passion FIRST, a commodity/commercial product/marketable item LAST and least. Its been that way for us since the early 90s to this day. Not a single member of GIG has sold an art work (neither has Paul Jaisini who’s a true professional) and we want to keep it that way. We do it for reasons far beyond ego. So advertising? Really? How the hell do you advertise or sell thin air, you know, invisible paintings, invisible anything? Ha ha, very funny indeed. The idea here is so simple, your neighbor’s dog can grasp it. Our motives: replace fast food for the mind with fine art, actual fine art. You know, creativity? Conscious thought? Talent? Skill? Knowledge? All that good stuff rolled into one to bring viewers more than a momentary ooohand aaahh reaction. Replace the recycled images ad nauseum; repetitious, worn-out ideas; disposable, gimmicky, money-driven fast art for simpletons. Stick with the highest of ideals and save the whole bloody planet.
Fine art is often confused with craft-making. This often creates bad blood between classically trained artists who put out paintings that leave a lasting impression, that make strong conversation pieces, that are thought-provoking and deep… and trained craftspeople whose skills are adequate to create decorative pieces for homely environments — landscapes, still lifes, animals, pretty fairies, common things of fantasy, and other simplicity. Skills alone are not enough for high art, you need a vision, a purpose, the ability to tell a story with every stroke of your brush that will both fascinate and terrify the viewers, arousing powerful emotions, illuminating. I have yet to see a visible painting in my generation that does anything at all for me, other than evoke sheer outrage and disgust. What a terrible waste of space and valuable resources it all is.
Paul Jaisini leads, we follow. He wishes to remain unknown - so do most of us. I’m next in line, slipping into recluse mode, no longer wanting to attach my face, my human image to my art stuff. I wish to be a nameless, faceless artist as well, invisible like P.J., and in his footsteps I too have destroyed thousands of my own artistic photography and digital art made with tedious, labor-intensive handwork. The whole point of this destruction is achieving the finest results possible by letting go of the imperfect, purging it on a regular basis, to make way for the perfect. I love what I do so it doesn’t matter, I know I’ll keep producing as much as I’m discarding, keeping the balance. Hoarding is an enemy of progress, especially the digital kind as there’s absolutely no limit to it. It’s like carrying a load of bricks on your back you’ll never use or need.
The watering down of creativity that digital pack ratting has caused as observed over the years is most tragic. For the creative individual, relying on terabytes of stock photos or OSFAP as I call them (Once Size Fits All Photos) instead of making your own as you used to when you had no choice, being 100% original, is a splinter in the conscience. It’s not evil to use stock of, say, things you don’t have access to (outer space, deep sea, Antarctica, etc.), but many digital artists I know today can’t take their own shot of a pencil ‘cause they “ain’t got no time for that!” How did they have time before? Did time get so compressed in only a decade?
Ohhhhh, and the edits, textures, filters, plug-ins and what-have-you available out there to everyone and their cats… are responsible for the tidal wave of rubbish that eclipses the magnificent light of the real talents.
I can tell you with utmost sincerity there is no better feeling on earth than knowing your creation is ALL yours, every pixel and dot, from the first to the last. It’s not always possible to make it so, but definitely the most rewarding endeavor. I’m most proud of myself when I can accomplish that.
Back to Paul Jaisini, from the start there have been a number of theories floating around on what his real story is. One of my own theories is that he stands for the unknowns of the world who can’t get representation, can’t get exhibited at a decent gallery because highly gifted/trained artists aren’t good enough - those kind of establishments prefer bananas, balloon dogs, feces, gigantic dicks/cunts, and all kinds of what-the-fucks…
So again, you don’t get the Paul Jaisini thing? That’s your problem. Don’t hate others for getting it. People are good, very good, at making baseless assumptions and impulsively spewing it as truth. They criticize and judge as if they’re high authorities on the subject yet they clearly lack education in fine art or art history and possess little to no talent or skill to back up their bullshit. My little “credibility radar” never fails. When they say I know this or I know that, I reply don’t say “I know” or state things as fact as a general rule of thumb - instead say “I assume/believe” and state the reasons you feel thus to appear less immature, especially about a controversial topic like invisible art. I have zero respect or tolerance for egomaniacs who think they know it all and act accordingly like arrogant pricks. Who can stand those, right? Once again, a good example would be: I, Stelly Riesling, believe everything I’ve written in this little manifesto to be correct based on personal experience and observation from multiple angles, thorough research and sufficient data collected from verifiable sources (and don’t go copying-pasting my own words back at me, be original). Just because you or I say so doesn’t make it so. Just because you or me think or believe so doesn’t make it true or right. I only ask that my opinions are regarded respectfully and whoever opposes them does so in a mature, civilized manner. We should only be entitled to opinions that don’t bring out the worst in us.
I don’t normally take such a position, but the time has come to stand up for what I believe in! It’s quite amusing and comical how haters think calling me names, attacking me or my interests or members of the project I’m part of for years is going to change something. It only makes more evident the importance of what I’m doing so I push on harder still.
Words of advise to those who can identify with me, with my frustrations over people’s reluctance to change their miserable ways, with our declining art world…
DON’T waste time on people who sweat the small stuff, whose actions are consistently inconsistent with their words. DO waste time on people who always keep their eye on the ball—the bigger picture of life.
Paul Jaisini’s invisible paintings are more than hype, more than your lame assumptions. Here’s one I got that’s pure gold: a cult! It started out as A JOKE OF MINE that was used against me. I told a then-good friend that he should come join our little “art cult” in a clearly lighthearted manner, and later he takes this idea I put in his head first and accuses me of being in an (imaginary) cult—the jokes on me eh?. But wait, aren’t cults religious? Our group consists of people around the world of different faiths (or none at all) so how could that ever work? If religion was about making fine (non-pop) art mainstream and bringing awesome, fresh, futuristic concepts to the collective consciousness, the world would not be so fucked up today because talent, creativity, originality and individuality would be the main focus, not superficial poppycock; those things would be praised and encouraged and supported in society by all institutions, not demonized and stigmatized.
Here is one thing I CAN state as solid fact: only one person close to Paul Jaisini knows the TRUE story, or at least some of it: EYKG. Everything else that has ever been said about him is myth, legend, gossip, speculation, the worst of which is said by jealous non-artists (wannabes, clones, posers, hang-ons, unoriginal ppl in general) and anti-artists (religious psychos, squares, losers and -duh- stupid ppl). Sadly, people are unable to see the bigger picture by letting their egos run their lives or repeating after others as parrots.
Commercial art, consumerism, and ignorance of the masses truly makes me want to curl up in a ball, not eat or drink or move until I die, just die in my sleep while dreaming of a better world, a world where real fine artists rule it with real fine art as they used to and life is beautiful once again….
Well I hope that settled THAT for now, or perhaps inadvertently made matters worse. I hope I didn’t sound too pissed from all these issues that keep popping up like penises on ChatRoulette… just got to me already! Can you tell? I had to put my foot down, stomp ‘em all!
To be continued, still lots more ignorance and pettiness to battle… Till then peace out my bambini. MWAH!
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
MANIFESTO GLEITZEIT 2015
PROLOGUE
Paul Jaisini was like a messiah, as you wish, who saw/understood the impending end and complete degeneration of Fine art or Art become and investment nothing more than that. He predicted the bubble pops art when everybody would eventually become an artist, including dogs cats and horses, because they as kids followed the main rule: express yourself without skills or knowledge or any aesthetic concerns. J. Pollack started pouring paints onto canvases; Julian Schnabel, former cab driver from NY, suddenly decided he could do better than what he saw displayed in galleries, so he started gluing dishes on canvases; A.Warhol, an industrial artist who made commercial silk-screen for the factories he worked in, started to exhibit "Campbell's soup" used for commercial adds... and later the thing that made him an "American Idol": by copying and pasting Hollywood celebrities (same type of posters he made before for movie theaters).
When Paul Jaisini stood out against the Me culture in the US by burning all of his own 120 brilliant paintings (according to the then-new director of Fort Worth MoMa Museum, who offered hin an exhibition of his art in 1992, and later the Metropolitan Museum curator, Phillippe de Montebello, in 1994).Paul probably assumed all fellow true fine artists would join him or stand by him against corruption of the art world.
And after 20 years of his stand-off...the time has finally come today. Many artists and humanitarians around the world took a place beside him. His invisible Paintings became a synonym for the future reincarnation of fine art and long lost harmony. The establishment is in panic! The "moneybags" (as Paul Jaisini named them) are in panic, because they invested BILLIONS of dollars in real crap made by
craftsmen. Now they realize that the reputation of American legends of expressionism was nothing but a copy of Russian avant-garde" Kazimir Malevich, Vasiliy Kandinsky and tens of others from France and Germany.. US tycoon investors were spending billions on "Me more original, than you". "Artist Shit" is a 1061 artwork by the Italian artist Piero Manzoni. The work consists of 90 tin cans, filled with feces. A tin can was sold for £124,000, 180,000 at Sothebys, 2007.
EPILOGUE
Before I resume promoting and admiring a very important art persona on today's international art arena, I'd like to clear up some BIG questions; people ask continuously and subconsciously, directly & indirectly: "Why does the name Paul Jaisini, flood the Internet in such "obnoxious" quantities that it's started suppressing some other activities that my friends might share with the rest of the Internet's Ego Me only Me www society? I can't just answer this... so I'll try to explain why I'm writing this: Jaisini's followers keep posting art and info about,
He IMHO the only hope in quickly decomposing visual fine art. "Paul Jaisini realized many years ago, in 1994, when he declared (at that time to himself only) the start of a New era, a New vision, that he is trying to redirect from the rat race, started by an establishment in post-war New York, long before the Internet culture.
Sub related information: Adolf Gottlieb, Mart Rothko, etc (after visiting Paris France in 1933):
"We must forget analytical art, we must express ourselves, as a 5 year old child would, without a developed consciousness. Forget about results - do what you feel, EXPRESS yourself with your own unique style"
With this statement Mark Rothko starts to teach his students, degeneration of fine art begins, and the generation of war of styles took a start signal of the material race, greatly rewarded by establishment "individual" - eccentric craftsmen - show business clowns.
Sub related Information: In the summer of 1936, Adolf Gottlieb painted more than 800 paintings, which was 20X more than he created in his whole art career as a painter, starting from the time of Gottlieb becomes a founding member of "The Ten" group in NYC "Group of Ten" was a very peculiar, enigmatic group... Based on a religious point of view;(where a human figure was prohibited from being created)
GLOSSARY
IN 1997, Paul Jaisini's best friend Ellen Y.K.Gottlieb started a cyber campaign by promoting on a very young Internet, back then, Paul Jaisini's burned paintings as Invisible Paintings, visible only through poetic essays. She and a handful of people saw his originals and were devastated that nobody could ever see them again. "We, his fans, believe that someday Paul will recreate his 120 burned paintings if he has any decency and moral obligation to his fans, who have dedicated decades to make it happen, for their Phoenix to rise from the ashes and the whole world will witness that all these years we spent to get him back to re-paint the Visuals again were not in vain," - said E.Y.K.Gottlieb in 2014 during the 20th anniversary celebration of Invisible Paintings to GIGroup in NYCity. So now, hopefully, this clears up why I and others do what we do - our "cyber terrorism" of good art, dedicated to Paul Jaisini's return, which is & and was our mission & our goal. We post good art to fight "troll art" which is worthless pics, after being passed through 1-click filters of free web apps. We are, in fact, against this www pops pollution, done with "bubble art" by the out of control masses with 5 billon pics a day: Pics of cats, memes, quotes,national geographic sunsets and waterfalls, not counting their own daily "selfies: and whatever self-indulging Me-ego-Me affairs, sponsored happily by photo gadget companies like Canon, Nikon, Sony...who churn out higher quality madness tools at lower cost.
This way Government taking away attention from the real world crisis of lowest morality & economical devastation. The masses are too easily re-engineered/manipulated by the Establishment PopsStyle delivered to them by pop music and Hollywood "super" stars. In 1992 Paul Jaisini's Gleitzeit theory predict such a massive, pops self-entertain madness, following technologicalexplosion, but not in illusive scales.
Uber Aless @2015 NYC USA
NOTE Date's numbers and events can be slightly inaccurate.
#gleitzeit #paul-jaisini #invisible #painting #art #futurism #art-news,
THE DISCOVERY by gleitzeit blog (the lost Interview in Rome)
I am using magnifying glass to be able to read a a PDF file of a very low quality.
My eyes are hurting. What I have found is something that is just not available…
I must say on the search for anything tagged “invisible” I find some pretty amazing
stuff I would never know about (later on that)
Paul meet me at the gate. He looked younger than I had expected. Dressed
casually.
As a host he cordially offered me to dine. While we entered the hall I had an urge to ask him, is this a museum? trying not to break anything as we passed by sculptures, paintings,
ceramics and a lot of other pieces of art which I had never seen before.
This unexpected excitement spoiled my appetite, and I was no longer hungry and
instead drank some wine.
He made clear that it is not any kind of a museum, but instead, his Paul’s studio. He lives not in Rome, but by the Terranian sea, where he was going shortly.
I asked Paul how he earns a living. Paul thought a little and tried to find an appropriate explanation. He finally lit on: "I am of independent means and don’t have to earn a living" pouring me another glass of wine.
I asked him: “ Can I buy some of your paintings? How much it will cost me?”
This question Paul left unanswered but he said that commonly he paints his
pictures without the intention to sell them.
Earlier I noticed a little girl and a young woman moving about him.
OMG!!!! I am shaken up. NOBODY KNOWS ANYTHING ABOUT Paul Jaisini’s personal life! I don’t believe this. THANK YOU GOOGLE! this is like really mystifying. I am not an emotional person, rather someone who loves to work hard and get the job done. This turned into something other than working.
Google nowadays is not your “grandfather’s” google so to speak. It is tailored
around you, your daily Internet activity, So finding any news, any special
information is no longer an easy task. I guess because there’s too much of
everything and what one is looking for could be placed out of reach. So we sort
of live on a planet that is flat as in dark ages. I say that because if one is
provided the info that is tailored with limitation it implies that breaking
away is not something one would even comprehend! We are too used to trust our social functioning and think that we know everything, on top of all news provided to us by the honest practice of the broadcasting companies.
We don’t want to be those conspiracy freaks with no trust to anything or
anyone. But truth is, if you don’t want to pay high dollar for some expert
articles on the topics that could give more than the free info, you are really
up against a brick wall of the new unknown reality and a total incapacity to acquire
the needed info of high quality without spending your whole life learning all the crap on the net and beyond in order to find finally what you need.
So search is a tricky mother. If you are creative and sort of spontaneous you
might somehow find your own style of fishing out the essentials. But in my case I
often felt helpless and lost no longer willing to participate in this
undertaking trying to document Gleitzeit.
It doesn’t look like I had managed a short explanation. But this is my formula of
finding something that is not available on the tailored to fit google search.
I enter the variations of phrases and words from the gleitzeit context of emails, postings, essays and add some other words I find on my way of locating Paul Jaisini's links. Turning the tag in a sort of a potion number nine that had proven to fetch some impossible to find info on such a quick inquiry without opening thousands of websites where I might find or might not find anything at all. And the most effective findings are with the tag "invisible" added to other things, be it email abbreviations and so on.
“The other must be his wife”, I thought, because Paul called her with some pet name's asking for a bottle of wine, for a book, or an ash tray.
“Is she your wife? “ I asked just in case.
Paul looked me in the eyes and said: “She is not my wife, nor the mother of my daughter, she is my secretary. “
The secretary I sensed didn’t like me much.
She didn’t call Jaisini by his name, Paul, but she instead addressed him as
mister Jaisini. She seemed obsequious and perhaps didn’t like me for my unrestrained manner and direct questions. She said to Paul: “You should not waste your time on this interview. You need to return to your work. “
Paul said: “It will be few minutes." and spent a few hours with me. A self-ruling man.
Paul didn’t drink any wine but he behaved at times extravagantly, showing the
outlines of the silhouettes in his paintings and explaining what was happening in the pictures.
Paul said that the point of his art being hidden from the public is an
intrigue that engages press in constant attempts to uncover the ‘truth’ behind it all. Nevertheless it is very disappointing, that people don’t care about real art, as they do about private affairs.
We went upstairs and in a spacious hall I saw a large painting. I didn’t hide my
awe.
“Wow! Where did you get such a big piece of canvas? The art stores don’t sell
this linen in such sizes. “
“It is stitched together from pieces," answered Paul.
“How did you reach the upper parts of the painting"
"I climbed the riser. Do you see the nude black man up there, tangled with a
serpent?"
"It reminds me of Laocoön. Is it intentional?"
"No, he is a symbol of physical grace without intellect. Do you see a group of
female bodies intertwined in a threesome?"
"No, I don’t see it. Where is the threesome?"
"To the left, look there."
"I look there."
"There the three figures, here is one, here is another one and the third one."
"Third is not a female figure, it’s some animal."
"It’s a female, but there is an animal, a bit higher up. The clown in the center
tears his mouth in a bloody smile, carrying out his role of a fool, laughing when
he wants to cry."
"Is that a monkey?"
"You got it, she is another symbol of the fate, she stopped hitting the tom-tom,
her direct purpose in circus. When she stopped to play and started to think, she
realized that her life is pitiful and she wants to kill herself. It’s a second
symbol of the same meaning."
"Tell me about that threesome again."
"Well, they show the natural grace, as three graces would, the sensual concept of
procreation."
"This picture must be a depiction of a circus performance, I suppose. Is it ?
Why it is so dynamic?"
"It is a circus performance but is the personal trial of human character. The ball construction is an object: - Paulsen’s ball, it is also a title of the painting."
"This ball creates some weight and it seems to move the composition with it’s
size and position and it seems to be on a verge of rolling down."
"You’re right! I also sense this immediate impulse to prevent the clown to fall
off that ball.
We went to other paintings, whole series of paintings.
When I gathered all my sensations about the art that surrounded me, it was time to leave. Paul Jaisini escorted me to the door. I shook his hand saying:
"You are an interesting man!"
"I am not a man..."
(the last sentence was a good ending)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolism_(arts)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invisibility
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatalism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gracefulness
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impossible_object
Have to type as I read PDF file that can’t be copied
Have to type as I read PDF file that can’t be copied
I am using magnifying glass to be able to read a a PDF file of very low quality. My eyes are hurting. What I have found is something that is just not available… I must say on the search for anything tagged “invisible” I find some pretty amazing stuff I would never know about (later on that) Now I am sitting in my office instead of having night out. It really is an impossible task to just discern the text. I filled up a spray bottle with cold water to spray my face to frequently refresh my eyes, as they get tired from the magnifying glass. It’s totally worth it, the thrill of discovery is my ultimate high.
Subj: Re: any suggestions?
Date: 2/5/00 Pacific Standard Time
From: bcwoodward@bigfoot.com (B. Woodward)
To: Yustas61@aol.com
CC: Angela Ahermeign
The attached file with original text before translation can be used in all related your project on Paul Jaisini.
All my corrections are in () and sometimes they replace the words nearby, other times they get inserted or have comments as well. It should be clear. Angela, you had some trouble with colloquialisms, unclear constructions and misplaced verb tenses. You switched among various forms of the past with irregularity. I’ve brushed it up. It makes a good narrative, though. Very interesting :)
Original Message-
From Angela A, Sent Thursday, February 03, 2000, 4: 25 PM
to bcwoodward@bigfoot.com
Subject Any suggestions
My first meeting with Paul Jaisini in Rome
(was it your first meeting with him, or just first time in Rome… unclear construction)
Paul Jaisini’s appearance at the exhibition of his art made a lot of noise in 1995 in Rome.
(caused a lot of noise, a lot of excitement, or was it just a noisy appearance?)
After newspapers published the (a) photograph of Paul Jaisini in the empty gallery, I read the article and realized how lucky I was to be in Rome. Nobody saw Paul Jaisini’s paintings. Yes, nobody… This what happened next. I called him once, then (a) second time. (,b)But Paul didn’t return my calls. Unfortunately I was not able to stay on guards (stand guard is the appropriate colloquialism) to catch him by the art gallery being (as I was) preoccupied with my (own) business. So I decided that I have (needed, not have) to find a way to see Paul Jaisini’s (hidden) paintings if he hides them. Such extravagance has (had) to be stopped.
I decided to offer him (no him here) to write a testament about (to) the existence of his art (, which would necessarily lead to him revealing it to me.) which will rise the necessity to see it.
I heard about Paul Jaisini before (that time) because he is quite a (reverse the a and quite) well-known contemporary artist. When I set up the appointment to meet (him) I easily found his cozy two- story town-house surrounded by (an) antique iron fence.
When I called (on) the intercom it took a while to explain who I was and why (I had come) did I come.
Paul meet me at the gate. He looked younger than I (had) expected. Dressed casually.
As a host he cordially offered me to dine. While we were entering (entered) the hall I had an urge to ask him, (“I) is it (this) a museum (?), trying to brake (break) anything, (no comma… as we passed) passing by sculptures, paintings, ceramic pieces (ceramics… drop the p word) and a lot of (other pieces of) art which I (had never seen before. drop rest of the sentence) was not able…
Gosh, I can feel how B. Woodward was feeling… WILL SHE REALLY SEE THE PAINTINGS by PAUL JAISINI?????? my eyes are punishing me for this thrill. I need to stop looking into the magnifier when I am now writing a comment without looking into unreadable copy.
Just waiting to get the courage to continue… my eyes need rest, I made myself some coffee with soy milk. But it surely means I want to prolong the suspense. I have no idea what is written in that text I located only god knows where or how.
I think that a gamer guru would understand me after he/she played hardest strategic games for a very long time and turned into a savvy thrill seeker.
Meta category: "Homage to Paul Jaisini" Art Series Collection. Gleitzeit International Group. Art Project Titled "Art About Art" Started 2013 - Ongoing.
Categpry: Artwork
Subcategory: Image Figure, Composition,
Tag: Female, Muse, Costume, Hand, Manifesto
FUTURE FOLLOWS PAUL JAISINI
Muse for Paul Jaisini In Gif Version. Bulgari Octo Maserati
It’s a Brave New Art (Series of Gif Homage to Paul Jaisini)
The sculpturesque Look In the Gif Collage here results in an interesting new effect when the Original Artwork is Transformed into other not what it had intended to be.
The art texture is just perfect to transform into “other” as well. The gif version here adds the precision line to make the texture to appear less artsy and more consumeristic — stainless steel, titanium with brushed satin surface.
If you take in consideration that this is an artwork of a posing model turned titanium it would quickly explain of the talent and creativity of the artist who unknowingly made this to go further with great success of the outcome in my opinion.
It seems to be more visual and dimensional, new, independent from the artist’s intent. It could have certain degree of a PREFABRICATED concept since there was an Initial Artwork turned into the Other Art. Yet not a ready-made. And what excites me even more — this has no
“Digital Art” in it being your pure flat artistic surface. The queen of all art medias, the NEW “BRAVE” PAINTING I’d name it that in a most unexpected and uncomplicated way makes its “emancipating” escape from the authority of its creator.
The resulting image is really something hardly expected as a result. The artwork is digitally processed even if so slightly, in good taste. Perhaps its the genius of the pieces design that made it work with the touch of animation.
To me it is so inspiring when we all are in the state of high expectation of what technology could have done to us any time soon, could have contribute to the aesthetics and all things that we need. Still currently I saw nothing of such awe quality in art except what is accomplished in the computer games… The digital (computer) art is well-known for the menacing effect is causes to the minds of the aspiring artists and damage beyond repair the “fine aesthetics” side of the visual image. I am not going into lengths on what the reusable visual image had accomplished so far. The new age artist works in the visually aggressive environment where the reusable image proliferates the purpose to create is lost when the image is not sacred.
Learning Adobe Photoshop and other programs prevent the creative growth. It’s only natural, learning to operate the program the artist is learning the technology not the arts. Eventually the digital artists work with the ready made modules, incapable to be creative and at the same time operate the tedious image processing programs.
Version. Bulgari Octo Maserati It’s a Brave New Art (Series of Gif Homage to Paul Jaisini)
GLEITZEIT INTERACTIVE III
20 July 21, 2003 Who the hell is Paul Jaisini, and where the hell is any of his art, and do you think we are all just stupid *f*c*ks? — jolly roger Answers Who the hell is Jolly Roger?
21 July 22, 2003. I thought I would post this here in the debate forum because …. now why do you think I posted this here? I just received this in my mail box. I know how I reacted and will post my thoughts, (errrr, they say my thoughts are going to posted soon?) but I did not want to influence anyone with my paint prior to them choosing paint for themselves. This is the e-mail ————- You are contacted because your comments were published or are going to be published at members.aol.com/JaisiniArt/home.html
22 1/16/00 in regards to 911 (911 Oil painting by Paul Jaisini) Tikinose writes: Wonder if there is someone out there trying to paint your descriptions now…
23 How big is the Jaisini movement in art? Is it a small current, or does it define the total aspects of an age? My question is how does the Jaisini movement differ from modernism or another form of modernism attempting to be anti-post modern?
24 March 24, 2000 I too have received this more than once— both times I think he got the address from the e-zine list.
25 4/25/00 Erin writes in response to the “Blue Reincarnation” that she would be much better prepared to comment had she seen the painting. She lives in a small town and have limited access to the Arts and culture. She also have limited access to a computer. “Because I hadn’t seen the painting, I was puzzled as to how I would respond…”
26 4/24/00 Jane writes that Yustas insites her desire to see these works and asks where she could see some online.
27 February 01, 2001: I checked this out. Evidently this guy mails out this same message 500 times a day, to promo this book he wrote. Also, I think there is no artist at all, you can’t find his paintings, you can only find his site, which has a header that reads something about “the painting of Paul Jaisini are said to be invisible”… Man, Yoko Ono’s exhibits are better. No Art at all, just a book. Rip off.
28 February 01, 2001 “Your explanation intrigues me. Please tell me more. If I understand your short description of this art-style, then the artist begins the line of expression and understanding of his or her work by the action of painting the work. Then each patron of art who views the completed work then adds to this suggestion of understanding so it sort of evolves and becomes, in effect, a work in itself? Or is this flowing expression about the work a continuation of that work itself? Where can I learn more and I would be interested in seeing some examples or where can I get your book?”
29 “When people write on a personal level they try to seem interesting, try to impress. When I don’t respond personally but with auto responses they slowly start to realize that there is no ground for possible personal level of acquaintance. The conclusion is that to most people creativity has a lot to do with search for personal fulfillment. EYKG”
WONDERLAND, art, photography, nyc, fun, PUZZLES, BEAUTIFUL, IMAGE, PAUL-JAISINI, GLEITZEIT, FUTURISTIC, FUTURE, MANIFESTO, MANIFESTO-GLEITZEIT, PHOTO, GIRL, PRETTY, SELF, ME, LOVE, <3, ADORABLE, CANDIES, SWEET, STYLE, NEW, STELLY-RIESLING, GIGNYC, GLEITZEIT-ART, INVISIBLE, ART-ABOUT-ART, PROJECT, CELEBRATE, IMAGINE, PINK, COLORFUL, NEON, INFOGRAPHICS,
neon-pink
Subj.: RE: Gleitzeit (Oil painting by Jaisini) Jaisini,
Date: 4/17/00 1:15:46 AM Eastern Daylight Time
If one examines the pre dialectic paradigm of discourse, one is faced with a choice: either accepts post textual dialectic theory or conclude that discourse comes from the collective unconscious. The characteristic theme of Sargeant’s model of the predialectic paradigm of discourse is the role of the observer as poet. Abian holds that the works of Fellini are not postmodern. However, Marx promotes the use of the predialectic paradigm of discourse to modify and analyze class. When you state, ”Paintings with a capacity to change visually by the artistic magic changing your subconscious mind" I’m sure you will agree that the paradigm, and some would say the collapse, of patriarchialist situationism depicted in Fellini’s 8 1/2 is also evident in La Dolce Vita. It could be said that several patriarchialisms concerning the common ground between narrativity and sexual identity may be revealed. The premise of subcultural modernism suggests that truth is intrinsically elitist. In a sense, Lyotard suggests the use of subcultural modernism to attack the status quo. The primary theme of the works of Fellini is the role of the observer as participant. Marx uses the term ‘patriarchialist situationism’ to denote the economy, and subsequent stasis, of presemiotic class. It could be said that in Satyricon, Fellini deconstructs cultural theory; in 8 1/2 he denies the predialectic paradigm of discourse. “Truth is part of the dialectic of consciousness,” says Lyotard; however, according to Pickett, it is not so much truth that is part of the dialectic of consciousness, but rather the Rubicon, and eventually the economy, of truth. Lacan’s essay on posttextual socialism suggests that the significance of the observer is significant form. However, if Derrida uses the term ‘the predialectic paradigm of discourse’ to denote a subsemiotic whole, which it seems you hint at when you state, ”a disorganized absolute harmony of everything expected from a “nonexistent” picture. It depends upon the pattern of line as a primal creator of whatever associated or disassociated from the theme.” But an abundance of appropriations concerning subcultural capitalist theory exists. The characteristic theme of the critique of the predialectic paradigm of discourse is not desublimation, but postdesublimation. Dahmus holds that the works of Fellini are reminiscent of Eco. The subject is contextualised into a subcultural discourse that includes consciousness as a paradox, as I’m sure you agree. Marx uses the term ‘the predialectic paradigm of discourse’ to denote a self-justifying totality. The subject is interpolated into a preconstructe deappropriation that includes consciousness as a paradox. It could be said that the premise of subcultural capitalist theory states that the purpose of the poet is social comment. Subcultural capitalist theory holds that society has intrinsic meaning. Much materialism concerning the role of the artist as poet may be found. In a sense, Bataille uses the term 'patriarchialist situationism' to denote the bridge between sexual identity and class. Any number of theories concerning the predialectic paradigm of discourse exists. However, Sartre promotes the use of subcultural capitalist theory to deconstruct sexual identity. Do you agree?
(via paul-jaisini-gleitzeit)