View allAll Photos Tagged multipleexposure
It is blue and the clear sky.
I nothing but look up without thinking about anything.
I want to go to the distance..
CAMERA: Canon NEW F1
LENS: Canon fd lens 28mm f/2,8 S.S.C.
FILM: Kodak color ISO 400 36 exp.
[cross processing + negative scanning]
FILM DEVELOPMENT: Developing Colour Film with the E6 Process
FILM SCANNED: OpticFilm Plustek 7400 with SilverFast Software
SHOOTING DATE: 09/2015
DEVELOPER DATE: 10/2015
TECHNIQUE: Multiple Exposure unedited.
NUMBER OF EXPOSURES: 2
NO POST-PROCESSING
OBJECT: Lenin's Library
PLACE: Moscow, Russia 2015
image shot with iphone 4s and edited with a variety of apps on ipad 2.
oh, and i've created a group for black and white images. you might wanna join.
At Balmerino here in the East of Scotkand , there is a waterlogged meadow that centuries ago used to belong to the local Abbey. These images are in-camera multiple exposures (using "Lighten" blending bode). The white balance was moved between exposures between "Tungsten" and "10,000 Degrees K". The centres of the images later were cut out, inverted, and pasted back with a drop-shadow added.
Copyright Stan Farrow FRPS
Just playing with multiple exposure settings on my camera outside the window of my apartment in Paris.
First Exposure:
SONY DSLR-A550
1/10s
f/6.3
ISO 200
-----
250mm (35mm equivalent: 375mm)
Sigma 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM
Second Exposure:
SONY DSLR-A550
1/10s
f/6.3
ISO 200
-----
250mm (35mm equivalent: 375mm)
Sigma 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM
multiple exposures
Kodak 35mm 400 Arista
Pentax K1000, SMC Pentax FA 320mm Zoom lens
C-41 color process ©2013auxiliofaux
a 5 exposure HDR of one of the nicest fords you'll ever see. and what a parking spot! check out the reflection in the back window
So, as alluded to in the last post, I’m one of a decreasingly shrinking (i.e. it’s getting bigger) group of photographers who has never done film before. Ever. Shot it, developed it, paid for it, et cetera. That is, until a couple weeks ago when I bought my Holga 120N. And I’ve got to admit, I thoroughly enjoy it.
Since I am not Thomas Hawk and have no desire to publish a million photographs before I leave this world, going back in time to the [somewhat] long-gone days of film isn’t much of a hindrance on some larger task. Having gotten used to digital where I can take a shot, see if it’s exposed properly, and shoot it again, using film was- let’s face it- absolutely bizarre. What do you mean I have to wait to see what I just shot?! I want to see it now!
What’s more, it’s a Holga! I have no earthly idea how the final photograph’s going to look, focus is dependent on one person, three people, a group of people, or a MOUNTAIN. Aperture is a lie and there is only one shutter speed. The viewfinder doesn’t even frame the shot! The only thing I really control is the film (in this case, Ilford Delta 400).
But regardless, I have to admit- it’s a helluva experience.
I actually developed two rolls of film the other day when I developed this roll. The first, as mentioned, was a roll of Ilford FP4+ 125. And I absolutely botched it. I couldn’t get the damned thing onto the steel reel, and with the exception of half of one shot, nothing came out as more than a milky white blob. Not a big deal as it was the first roll I ran through the Holga and didn’t really have anything spectacular on it anyways.
Anyways, as for the actual developing, I was hoping that the darkroom on campus would have Rodinal (I heard it was forgiving) or Diafine (I like the contrast I’ve seen in shots using Delta 400 and Diafine), and took some numbers with me for both of those, but alas, they only had D-76. Again, no worries- I don’t really have preferences yet. This particular reel was soaked for 10.5 minutes, with 60 seconds of continuous agitation and an additional 3 inversions every 30 seconds. I used water as a stop bath (30s continuous agitation), and some unknown fixer for 6 minutes (same agitation as developer) followed by 8 minutes of washing. I actually skipped the Photoflo altogether, but that was due more to forgetfullness than intent, but there it is.
Now, the local photo store didn’t have any archival sheets for 120, so for the time being, I scanned in the shots and rerolled the film back in between the paper that 120 comes backed with and put that into the box. So much for preservation. It shall continue to live digitally at the least. (*knock on wood*) What can I say? I live in the digital age, and even when doing something analog like film, it’ll end up in the realm of the digital anyways.
So what are my thoughts? I think I love it. Or at least, I could, and will, given that the reeling process gets easier. You can’t see it in these scans, but even this second roll was imperfectly reeled. And I totally manhandled the film in the process. The whole process after reeling is quite enjoyable; I get to talk to other people in the darkroom with me all while shaking a metal can and eyeing a clock- we must seem ridiculous to a casual observer. Also, it’s probably the only bit of chemistry I’ll ever actually enjoy, so there’s that.
Holga 120N
Ilford Delta 400 Pro, D-76 (stock), 10.5min
Epson 4490
Decide upon an emotion you wish to convey, use that as your guide to build your story.
— Ian Teh
Ian adds…
“One of photography’s greatest strengths is its ability to emote through its ability to suggest. How would you frame your image based on the emotion you have decided upon? What colours will you use (or not)? What details will you include (or not)? What elements will be a constant recurrence in your story? These are just some of the thoughts that you could ponder upon. This reductive process helps define a framework that will guide you into capturing that distinct emotional note you are looking for in your story.”
--
Emotion: Devotion