View allAll Photos Tagged automatically.
Manufactured by Kodak AG, Stuttgart, West Germany
Model: c.1962 Kodak type 032, produced between 1960-63 with quantity of 48.000 units
Small light meter window version
35mm film Viewfinder camera
Engraving on the top plate: Retina Automatic II
Lens: Schneider-Kreuznach Retina Xenar 45mm f/2.8 filter slip-on, serial no.6921888
Aperture: up to f/22setting: Auto (A) or manual (f numbers), ring and scale on the lens-shutter barrel
Focus range: 1-12m +inf
Focusing: manual front cell focusing, ring, distance scale with 1, 2 and 3 dots for portrait, group and landscape and DOF scale on the lens.
These dots are indicated in the viewfinder by one, two or three yellow dots which correspond to focussing zones on the lens.
Shutter: Compur leaf shutter, speeds: 1/30-1/500 +B, setting : ring and scale on the lens-shutter barrel
Shutter release: a lever, on the lens-shutter barrel
Cocking lever: also winds the film, long stroke, on the bottom plate
Frame counter: manual reset, additive type, window on the top-plate, setting:by a knob on the backof the top plate when pressing the small knob beside the counter window
Viewfinder: bright frame finder, with parallax correction lines
Exposure meter: Gossen Coupled Selenium cell meter, Shutter priority auto
Film speed range: ASA 10-1250, setting: ring and scale on the lens-shutter barrel, ring releases by pressing the small lever on it
Exposure setting: Set the desired speed then set to A on the aperture ring. Check the needle window that the needle must be between the red marks. If not, set new speeds. This needle show the aperture that set automatically.
In low light a "STOP" sign comes up in the viewfinder and the shutter is locked.
Full manual overide is also available.
Re-wind knob: on the left of the top plate
Re-wind release: a button on the bottom plate
Flash PC socket: on the front panel
Cold-shoe
Memory dial : on the re-wind knob
Self-timer
Back cover: hinged, opens by a knob with security lever, on the bottom plate
Embossing on the back cover: Kodak Retina Camera
Tripod socket: ¼"
Strap lugs
Body: metal; Weight: 573g
Serial no. 67643
More info: McKeown's 12th ed. p.524, Collector Guide to Kodak Cameras p.141
in Kodak by Mischa Koning, in Wolfgang Brüsehaber website, in Kamera Museum by Kurt Tauber, in Camerapedia
[+]
A quick shot during a few seconds of downtime during yesterday's OneLight Workshop, which was cool. I finally reworked my website, still not up to par, but you can read a little about the workshop over there if you'd like.
The wicked camera belongs to this gentleman.
Manufactured from 1969 to 1971 by the Polaroid Corp. of Cambridge, Massachusetts. The “Automatics” added a fully automatic, transistorized electronic shutter that gave continuously-variable shutter speeds. The 315 was a light plastic model that used a simple viewfinder with a distance scale superimposed in the field of view (which was linked with parallax correction to the focusing mechanism). Basically a next generation 210. It did, however, have a plastic lens.
Fun fact: One issue with the Polaroid pack films what that their development time was sensitive to cold. If you took your pictures in the outside winter air, sometimes your pictures turned out too light as a result of the chemical process that migrated the dyes taking too long. About the time of the introduction of the 300 series Automatics, Polaroid introduced the “Cold Clip”—basically two sheets of metal, fabric hinged at one end that you kept in an “inside coat or shirt pocket” and put your developing film in to keep it warm in these situations. By the time SX-70 film rolled around, it would fully develop—although slower—in cold weather, but people would still attempt to keep them warm to make them develop faster. Some would even rub the picture between their hands—giving some odd results that eventually lead to the art of the “manipulated” Polaroid print…
Cover for an unwritten book
If you like work like this, please consider joining
Book Covers for Imaginary Novels
I believe the photograph of the beautiful girl on which the cover picture is based is Public Domain; should this not be the case and you are the copyright owner of the original image, please contact me.
©2015 Daniel Novotny. Transparent Watercolor on Paper, 35 x 50 cm
www.danielnovotnyart.com/?p=5251
Visit my blog at www.danielnovotnyart.com!
New Chris-mobile. It replaces my '98 2.5 TDi of the same type, because it is not possible to drive a fuel-economic diesel in the Netherlands anymore, I now drive a gasguzzler.
Yay Environment!
70 liters of dieselfuel = 1200 km's.
70 liters of petrol = 700 km's
explain to me about environment again....
absolutely delighted to see this Classic big BMW in such great condition, wish all BMW owners looks after their cars like this owner does. Fabric interior (non leather) is in great condition. No good pictures of the front due to it being parked against a wall. The alloy wheels are not great though
Registration Number
BLN717T
Make
BMW
Model
733 I AUTO
Year of manufacture
1978
Engine size (cc)
3295
All, thanks for coming, since you're here, check out the rest of my photostream .
Or just check out my 50 most popular shots.
All of my vintage ads can be seen here
Thanks,
SA_Steve
Engine: International DT466E 250 HP six cylinder diesel
Transmission: Allison MT-643 four speed automatic
Photo courtesy of Auctions International.
Prod. Konishiroku Co., 1970's
Sn.134237
Lens: Konica Hexanon 2,8/38mm
Shutter: Copal 1/30-1/650 (automatic)
ISO: 25-400
Manufactured from 1967 to 1969 by the Polaroid Corp. of Cambridge, Massachusetts. The “Automatics” added a fully automatic, transistorized electronic shutter that gave continuously-variable shutter speeds. They used a new type of film that loaded in flat, drop-in packs. The 210 was a light plastic model that used a simple viewfinder with a distance scale superimposed in the field of view (which was linked with parallax correction to the focusing mechanism). Shown here with it’s matching Polaroid 268 flash attachment that used an M3 clear bulb.
Fun fact: Many people thought the gang at Polaroid couldn’t count! After all, the numbers on the parts had #1 for focusing, #2 for taking the picture (releasing the shutter), #3 for cocking the shutter and #4 for pulling the film out to start development. Why did you cock the shutter in the middle of the process? Well, the reason is simple. The new electronic shutter was “on” once you fired the camera—powering a small CdS cell on the front panel to select a speed from 10 secs to 1/1200 sec. If you left the cocking lever in the “up” position, the shutter system stayed on, measuring light—and running down the camera battery! Polaroid numbered the steps so that you conserved battery power. And, when I used to sell camera equipment, we use to see many of these cameras come in with exploded and corroded batteries (sometimes completely ruining the camera) where the camera had been stored with the cocking lever up. See, you really should follow the steps 1-2-3-4 (see the additional image of the numbers on the pack camera)…
"The Yashica “Auto Focus Motor” this handy camera features automatic focusing and exposure setting so that all you need to do is train your camera on the subject and press the shutter. And its built-in electronic flash unit lets you get beautiful shots even indoors and at night. Anyone can enjoy easy picture taking with this fully automatic camera that takes care of film loading and film advancing before shooting and film rewinding afterwards. The Yashica Auto Focus is a 35mm compact camera was made in 1978."
source: www.analoguekaki.com/wordpress/products-page/categories/y...
In storage of kitchen appliance the place of automatic roti maker is default because its need is compulsory in all kitchen. Its process is so easy that’s why child can also use of it who are mature. To get free from rushed and busy life ,we have find out it. It is an opportunity for both of you and us as respectively to use and grow and chance to improve our functionality. Now it is not hard to live a good life by the use of This one. Its like as an order for chapati in hotel.
I need two things for this camera: film and some flashbulbs. Should work though!
I think this would be a bit of fun to carry at a party, but that's just me.
The first display reads:
ADA in Vietnam – Automatic Weapons Battery (.50 Caliber Machine Gun)
The M55 Quad-.50 Caliber antiaircraft system was designed as a lightweight alternative to the M16 antiaircraft halftrack or M51 2-ton trailer Quad-.50 systems. While all three utilized the Maxson M45D quad-.50 turret, the M55 mounted on a compact M20 trailer and first saw service with the US Army Airborne Forces in the fall of 1944. The M55 could fire a staggering 2,600 rounds per minute (650 rounds per gun) and was easily transportable, whether in a C-47, glider or in the bed of a 2 ½ ton “deuce and a half” cargo truck.
By early 1966, Quad-50s were again pouring fire downrange, this time in South Vietnam in support of US forces. Four separate automatic weapons batteries used the M55 system in Vietnam in both the truck-mounted and fixed emplacement firebase defense roles.
The M35 series 2 1/2 ton truck served as the standard prime mover for the M55 system. M35s performed admirably in the gun truck role, often hauling more than twice their specified 5,000 lb. load. With the turret weighing in at 1,600 lbs, and 10,000 rounds of .50 caliber ammunition carried in the truck’s bed (4,000 lbs.), the AW battery gun trucks usually had at least 2,000 lbs. of additional sandbags, armor and crew equipment aboard as well. This additional weight tended to overstress and wear on transmission and engine components, causing gun trucks to be maintenance intensive. Due to the particularly rought terrain in the Central Highlands, E/41st replaced most of their M35s with M54 5-ton trucks by 1969.
M35 Specifications:
Weight: 13,000 lbs.
Length: 23 feet
Width: 7 feet 11 inches
Height: 9 feet 4 inches
Engine: (M35A1) 140hp LDS-427 Turbo Multifuel Engine
Range: 400 miles
Crew: 5 (driver, commander, gunner, and two loaders)
The primary missions for the Air Defense Quad-.50s in Vietnam were convoy escort and firebase defense.
The terrain in the Central Highlands of II Corps wore down E/41st M35 trucks rather quickly, particularly because of the increased loads they would typically carry. Following in the footsteps of several transportation gun truck companies in the region, E/41st adopted the M54 5-ton truck, giving them increased performance and a heavier load carrying capability. That increased load capacity translated into better armor and crew protection and more ammunition for the .50 calibers.
Citation:
The President of the United States of America, authorized by Act of Congress, July 9, 1918 (amended by act of July 25, 1963), takes pleasure in presenting the Distinguished Service Cross to Sergeant Jeffery G. Jarman, United States Army, for extraordinary heroism in connection with military operations involving conflict with an armed hostile force in the Republic of Vietnam, while serving with Battery D (Machine Gun), 71st Artillery, II Field Force Artillery. Sergeant Jarman distinguished himself by exceptionally valorous actions on 18 May 1969 during a coordinated rocket and ground attack on Husky Compound at Xuan Loc. Shortly after midnight, from his position on a quad fifty-caliber machine gun, Sergeant Jarman detected a large North Vietnamese force advancing on the perimeter and immediately directed fire on the assaulting troops. As the battle continued, he realized that the compound’s other quad fifty-caliber gun had fallen silent. Fearing that the emplacement was in danger, Sergeant Jarman dashed across the fire-swept base to reach the other weapon. Observing that the position had received a direct rocket grenade hit, he quickly removed one casualty to safety. Returning to extract the second wounded gunner, Sergeant Jarman was shot in the shoulder by an enemy soldier who had penetrated the perimeter. Using his good arm, he fired his M-16 rifle killing three hostile invaders and routing the remaining aggressors. While Sergeant Jarman provided suppressive fire, members of the gun crew moved the casualties to a nearby 105 millimeter howitzer position to receive medical treatment. Only after he expended his ammunition did he withdraw to the howitzer where he assisted the artillery crew in cutting fuses and dispensing ammunition. Suddenly, a rocket impacted next to the howitzer, wounding several of the crew members as well as Sergeant Jarman. Despite his multiple wounds, he braved the incoming fusillade to drag several critically wounded men to the next howitzer position. When all of the casualties had been moved, he continued to fire on the enemy until rendered unconscious by his wounds. Sergeant Jarman’s extraordinary heroism and devotion to duty were in keeping with the highest traditions of the military service and reflect great credit upon himself, his unit, and the United States Army.
The second display reads:
E Battery, 41st Artillery, attached to 4/60th Artillery
G Battery, 55th Artillery, attached to the Americal Division
G Battery, 65th Artillery, attached to 1/44th Artillery
E Battery, 71st Artillery, attached to 5/2nd Artillery
These four batteries operated almost continuously until finally returning to the US in 1971 / 1972.
The final display reads:
Air Defense Units in Vietnam
The US air defense role in the Republic of Vietnam was straightforward: defend friendly ground forces from air and ground attack. The equipment Air Defenders had at their disposal ranged from World War 2 vintage M55 Quad-.50 caliber machine gun turrets to the cutting edge MIM-23 Hawk Missile System.
Arriving in South Vietnam in early 1966 as “Artillery” battalions and separate batteries, Air Defenders served under I and II Field Force, providing convoy escort, firebase defense, battlefield illumination and an air defense umbrella over friendly territory that was second to none.
Three battalions and eight separate batteries covered friendly skies from the DMZ south to the Mekong Delta. Two additional battalions provided medium range air defense for the cities of Da Nang and Saigon from the very real threat of North Vietnamese IL-28 medium bombers.
In July 1968, Air Defense split from the Artillery branch and became an independent branch of the US Army. Although relatively few in number, Air Defenders in Vietnam made an indelible impression on the US experience in Vietnam and those battalions returned home in 1972 as the combat-experienced core of the Army’s newest branch.
Taken December 17th, 2013.
Rapid strata formation in soft sand (field evidence).
Photo of strata formation in soft sand on a beach, created by tidal action of the sea.
Formed in a single, high tidal event. Stunning evidence which displays multiple strata/layers.
Why this is so important ....
It has long been assumed, ever since the 17th century, that layers/strata observed in sedimentary rocks were built up gradually, layer upon layer, over many years. It certainly seemed logical at the time, from just looking at rocks, that lower layers would always be older than the layers above them, i.e. that lower layers were always laid down first followed, in time, by successive layers on top.
This was assumed to be true and became known as the superposition principle.
It was also assumed that a layer comprising a different material from a previous layer, represented a change in environmental conditions/factors.
These changes in composition of layers or strata were considered to represent different, geological eras on a global scale, spanning millions of years. This formed the basis for the Geologic Column, which is used to date rocks and also fossils. The evolutionary, 'fossil record' was based on the vast ages and assumed geological eras of the Geologic Column.
There was also circular reasoning applied with the assumed age of 'index' fossils (based on evolutionary beliefs & preconceptions) used to date strata in the Geologic Column. Dating strata from the assumed age of (index) fossils is known as Biostratigraphy.
We now know that, although these assumptions seemed logical, they are not supported by the evidence.
At the time, the mechanics of stratification were not properly known or studied.
An additional factor was that this assumed superposition and uniformitarian model became essential, with the wide acceptance of Darwinism, for the long ages required for progressive microbes-to-human evolution. There was no incentive to question or challenge the superposition, uniformitarian model, because the presumed, fossil 'record' had become dependant on it, and any change in the accepted model would present devastating implications for Darwinism.
This had the unfortunate effect of linking the study of geology so closely to Darwinism, that any study independent of Darwinian considerations was effectively stymied. This link of geology with Darwinian preconceptions is known as biostratigraphy.
Some other field evidence, in various situations, can be observed here: www.flickr.com/photos/101536517@N06/sets/72157635944904973/
and also in the links to stunning, experimental evidence, carried out by sedimentologists, given later.
_______________________________________________
GEOLOGIC PRINCIPLES (established by Nicholas Steno in the 17th Century):
What Nicolas Steno believed about strata formation is the basis of the principle of Superposition and the principle of Original Horizontality.
dictionary.sensagent.com/Law_of_superposition/en-en/
“Assuming that all rocks and minerals had once been fluid, Nicolas Steno reasoned that rock strata were formed when particles in a fluid such as water fell to the bottom. This process would leave horizontal layers. Thus Steno's principle of original horizontality states that rock layers form in the horizontal position, and any deviations from this horizontal position are due to the rocks being disturbed later.”)
BEDDING PLANES.
'Bedding plane' describes the surface in between each stratum which are formed during sediment deposition.
science.jrank.org/pages/6533/Strata.html
“Strata form during sediment deposition, that is, the laying down of sediment. Meanwhile, if a change in current speed or sediment grain size occurs or perhaps the sediment supply is cut off, a bedding plane forms. Bedding planes are surfaces that separate one stratum from another. Bedding planes can also form when the upper part of a sediment layer is eroded away before the next episode of deposition. Strata separated by a bedding plane may have different grain sizes, grain compositions, or colours. Sometimes these other traits are better indicators of stratification as bedding planes may be very subtle.”
______________________________________________
Several catastrophic events, flash floods, volcanic eruptions etc. have forced Darwinian, influenced geologists to admit to rapid stratification in some instances. However they claim it is a rare phenomenon, which they have known about for many years, and which does nothing to invalidate the Geologic Column, the fossil record, evolutionary timescale, or any of the old assumptions regarding strata formation, sedimentation and the superposition principle. They fail to face up to the fact that rapid stratification is not an extraordinary phenonemon, but rather the prevailing and normal mechanism of sedimentary deposition whenever and wherever there is moving, sediment-laden water. The experimental evidence demonstrates the mechanism and a mass of field evidence in normal (non-catastrophic) conditions shows it is a normal everyday occurrence.
It is clear from the experimental evidence that the usual process of stratification is - that strata are not formed by horizontal layers being laid on top of each other in succession, as was assumed. But by sediment being sorted in the flowing water and laid down diagonally in the direction of flow. See diagram:
www.flickr.com/photos/truth-in-science/39821536092/in/dat...
The field evidence (in the image) presented here - of rapid, simultaneous stratification refutes the Superposition Principle and the Principle of Lateral Continuity.
We now know, the Superposition Principle only applies on a rare occasion where sedimentary deposits are laid down in still water.
Superposition is required for the long evolutionary timescale, but the evidence shows it is not the general rule, as was once believed. Most sediment is laid down in moving water, where particle segregation is the general rule, resulting in the simultaneous deposition of strata/layers as shown in the photo.
See many other examples of rapid stratification (with geological features): www.flickr.com/photos/101536517@N06/sets/72157635944904973/
Rapid, simultaneous formation of layers/strata, through particle segregation in moving water, is so easily created it has even been described by sedimentologists (working on flume experiments) as a law ...
"Upon filling the tank with water and pouring in sediments, we immediately saw what was to become the rule: The sediments sorted themselves out in very clear layers. This became so common that by the end of two weeks, we jokingly referred to Andrew's law as "It's difficult not to make layers," and Clark's law as "It's easy to make layers." Later on, I proposed the "law" that liquefaction destroys layers, as much to my surprise as that was." Ian Juby, www.ianjuby.org/sedimentation/
The example in the photo is the result of normal, everyday tidal action formed in a single incident, and subsequently eroded by water flow revealing the strata/layers.
Where the water current or movement is more turbulent, violent, or catastrophic, great depths (many metres) of stratified sediment can be laid down in a short time. Certainly not the many millions of years assumed by evolutionists.
The composition of strata formed in any deposition event. is related to whatever materials are in the sediment mix, not to any particular timescale. Whatever is in the mix will be automatically sorted into strata/layers. It could be sand, or other material added from mud slides, erosion of chalk deposits, coastal erosion, volcanic ash etc. Any organic material (potential fossils), alive or dead, engulfed by, or swept into, a turbulent sediment mix, will also be sorted and buried within the rapidly, forming layers.
See many other examples of rapid stratification with geological features: www.flickr.com/photos/101536517@N06/sets/72157635944904973/
Stratified, soft sand deposit. demonstrates the rapid, stratification principle.
Important, field evidence which supports the work of the eminent, sedimentologist Dr Guy Berthault MIAS - Member of the International Association of Sedimentologists.
(Dr Berthault's experiments (www.sedimentology.fr/)
And also the experimental work of Dr M.E. Clark (Professor Emeritus, U of Illinois @ Urbana), Andrew Rodenbeck and Dr. Henry Voss, (www.ianjuby.org/sedimentation/)
Location: Yaverland, Isle of Wight. Photographed 12/10/2018 This field evidence demonstrates that multiple strata in sedimentary deposits do not need millions of years to form and can be formed rapidly. This natural example confirms the principle demonstrated by the sedimentation experiments carried out by Dr Guy Berthault and other sedimentologists. It calls into question the standard, multi-million year dating of sedimentary rocks, and the dating of fossils by depth of burial or position in the strata.
Mulltiple strata/layers are evident in this example.
Dr Berthault's experiments (www.sedimentology.fr/) and other experiments (www.ianjuby.org/sedimentation/) and field studies of floods and volcanic action show that, rather than being formed by gradual, slow deposition of sucessive layers superimposed upon previous layers, with the strata or layers representing a particular timescale, particle segregation in moving water or airborne particles can form strata or layers very quickly, frequently, in a single event.
And, most importantly, lower strata are not older than upper strata, they are the same age, having been created in the same sedimentary episode.
Such field studies confirm experiments which have shown that there is no longer any reason to conclude that strata/layers in sedimentary rocks relate to different geological eras and/or a multi-million year timescale. www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PVnBaqqQw8&feature=share&.... they also show that the relative position of fossils in rocks is not indicative of an order of evolutionary succession. Obviously, the uniformitarian principle, on which the geologic column is based, can no longer be considered valid. And the multi-million, year dating of sedimentary rocks and fossils needs to be reassessed. Rapid deposition of stratified sediments also explains the enigma of polystrate fossils, i.e. large fossils that intersect several strata. In some cases, tree trunk fossils are found which intersect the strata of sedimentary rock up to forty feet in depth. upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/08/Lycopsi... They must have been buried in stratified sediment in a short time (certainly not millions, thousands, or even hundreds of years), or they would have rotted away. youtu.be/vnzHU9VsliQ
In fact, the vast majority of fossils are found in good, intact condition, which is testament to their rapid burial. You don't get good fossils from gradual burial, because they would be damaged or destroyed by decay, predation or erosion. The existence of so many fossils in sedimentary rock on a global scale is stunning evidence for the rapid depostion of sedimentary rock as the general rule. It is obvious that all rock containing good intact fossils was formed from sediment laid down in a very short time, not millions, or even thousands of years.
See set of photos of other examples of rapid stratification: www.flickr.com/photos/101536517@N06/sets/72157635944904973/
Carbon dating of coal should not be possible if it is millions of years old, yet significant amounts of Carbon 14 have been detected in coal and other fossil material, which indicates that it is less than 50,000 years old. www.ldolphin.org/sewell/c14dating.html
www.grisda.org/origins/51006.htm
Evolutionists confidently cite multi-million year ages for rocks and fossils, but what most people don't realise is that no one actually knows the age of sedimentary rocks or the fossils found within them. So how are evolutionists so sure of the ages they so confidently quote? The astonishing thing is they aren't. Sedimentary rocks cannot be dated by radiometric methods*, and fossils can only be dated to less than 50,000 years with Carbon 14 dating. The method evolutionists use is based entirely on assumptions. Unbelievably, fossils are dated by the assumed age of rocks, and rocks are dated by the assumed age of fossils, that's right ... it is known as circular reasoning.
* Regarding the radiometric dating of igneous rocks, which is claimed to be relevant to the dating of sedimentary rocks, in an occasional instance there is an igneous intrusion associated with a sedimentary deposit -
Prof. Aubouin says in his Précis de Géologie: "Each radioactive element disintegrates in a characteristic and constant manner, which depends neither on the physical state (no variation with pressure or temperature or any other external constraint) nor on the chemical state (identical for an oxide or a phosphate)."
"Rocks form when magma crystallizes. Crystallisation depends on pressure and temperature, from which radioactivity is independent. So, there is no relationship between radioactivity and crystallisation.
Consequently, radioactivity doesn't date the formation of rocks. Moreover, daughter elements contained in rocks result mainly from radioactivity in magma where gravity separates the heavier parent element, from the lighter daughter element. Thus radiometric dating has no chronological signification." Dr. Guy Berthault www.sciencevsevolution.org/Berthault.htm
Rapid strata formation and rapid erosion at Mount St Helens.
slideplayer.com/slide/5703217/18/images/28/Rapid+Strata+F...
Visit the fossil museum:
www.flickr.com/photos/101536517@N06/sets/72157641367196613/
Just how good are peer reviews of scientific papers?
www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60.full
www.examiner.com/article/want-to-publish-science-paper-ju...
The neo-Darwinian idea that the human genome consists entirely of an accumulation of billions of mutations is, quite obviously, completely bonkers. Nevertheless, it is compulsorily taught in schools and universities as 'science'.
And now an example of an FLF with semi-automatic transmission. They came late in the FLF's production life and were found only among the F registrations and the handful of Gs. We in Bristol never had any, our deliveries ceasing at E-reg. There is no getting away from the fact that the FLF was eminently unsuitable for the type of work on which it was used in Bristol ...but then, Bristol must have been the largest city in the country wherein the bus services were provided by a "company" operator. Elsewhere municipal operators had long ago found some way of taking the labour out of driving buses in urban circumstances. Mind you, in my experience it was the hard, springy brake pedal, with its distinct feel of air pressure resistance, rather than the clutch, that caused the legs to become fatigued. Really semi-auto was wasted on the FLF, operators such as Crosville and Eastern National using theirs on inter-urban rather than urban services. This was Eastern National no. 2919, photographed at Chelmsford on Saturday 29th March 1980.