View allAll Photos Tagged SPLC
I marked inauguration day by donating to the Anti-Defamation League, Committee to Protect Journalists, Common Cause, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Equality Florida, Freedom of the Press Foundation, Inequality Media, Internet Archive, Mayday, NARAL Pro-Choice America, Organizing for Action, and Public Citizen. Prior to the inauguration I had donated to the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, Pro-Publica, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and the Standing Rock Sioux. I'm not done yet.
Rockville Maryland, June 27, 2023. A huge group (1,000?) of mainly African American and Muslim folks gathered at the Board Of Education to protest LGBTQ+ education in Montgomery County MD public schools. They are advocating to restore an 'opt out' policy. That means that if a teacher assigns reading material that parents object to, the student does not have to participate. The main organizers of today's protest seemed to be white activists associated with intolerant right wing outfits including the SPLC* designated hate group Moms For Liberty. Also present were the shadowy Family Rights For Religious Freedom*** and The Coalition For Virtue**. Sadly, there also seemed to be major buy-in from Muslim groups I respect that should know better. Inside the BOE there was testimony about MoCo's policies both pro and con but the general public was largely excluded for understandable security reasons.
A small contingent of my Rainbow Brigade friends were on hand for a dance party to show support for our LGBTQ+ neighbors. Although one of the white male right wing speakers claimed that there was physical conflict initiated by the Rainbows this was not the case. I've attended and photographed a fair number of Rainbow events and I can report that Rainbow protectors are well trained in peaceful de-escalation techniques. In fact, one of the folks here today actually took a punch from a Proud Boy and just turned the other cheek. Thankfully he has healed and continues to show up to support his community with skill and grace.
*Southern Poverty Law Center
**Said to be a Muslim group, established 2023?
***Also Muslim focused, established 2023? No names? Why?
[Re-publisher's note: Warning, the National Alliance is a very prominent politically incorrect organization, please make the ADL and SPLC aware of this controversial article. Do your part in helping us fighting hate on Internet]
Why Was Thomas Watson’s Statue Removed?
Published by Michael Olanich, on September 6th, 2015
Little-known fact: Watson was offered large sums to be Leo Frank’s defense lawyer, but his conscience would not allow him to accept.
by David Sims
ON THE 100th anniversary of the founding of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, that infamous Jewish influence and espionage organization was successful in pressuring a Georgia governor into ordering the removal of the statue of former US Senator Thomas E. Watson (D-GA, 1921-22). Senator Watson offended the Jews by calling for the execution of Leo Frank, a Jewish man who raped and murdered 13-year-old Mary Ann Phagan at the factory he managed in 1913. More than a century later, the Jews are still trying to put a whitewash on the villainy of one of their own kind, and they are still suborning the corruption of public officials to achieve that purpose.
Thomas Watson had no particular antisemitism in him. Just before Leo Frank went on trial for Mary Phagan’s murder, Frank’s relatives approached Watson and requested that he be Frank’s defense attorney. Believing Leo Frank to be guilty, Watson declined the offer of generous compensation from that wealthy Jewish family.
Watson did, however, have a bitter political rival in the gentile Hoke Smith. During a contested election, Watson accused Smith of soliciting Jewish favor (and financing) by taking the side of Leo Frank, who had been convicted of Phagan’s murder. He accused Smith of selling out justice in order to win the election. Watson wrote: “Frank belongs to the Jewish aristocracy, and it was determined by the rich Jews that no aristocrat of their race should die for the death of a working-class Gentile.”
And that’s why the Jewish ADL wanted the statue of the former Senator from Georgia taken down in Atlanta.
Source: nationalvanguard.org/2015/09/why-was-thomas-watsons-statu...
Why was the decades-old Tom Watson statue at the Atlanta Capitol entrance moved on the centennial (October 1913 – October 2013) of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith founding year and month?
Because Leo Frank was elected the Atlanta B’nai B’rith president of the Gate City Lodge #144 in 1912 and his Summer of 1913 conviction for the rape and strangulation-murder of 13-year-old Mary Phagan had galvanized B’nai B’rith HQ to found the ADL less than two months after the fact.
Even though Leo Frank was convicted in late August 1913, in September 1913 his 500 member Independent Order of B’nai B’rith fraternal organization in Georgia voted UNANIMOUSLY (see Atlanta Constitution, September 24, 1913 at The Internet Archive) to re-elect him their president. So while Leo Frank was incarcerated in the city jail as his appeals were wending their way through the appellate courts (1913-1915), he was running the affairs of this powerful Atlanta Jewish group like a powerful mafia boss behind bars until the Autumn of 1914. He was not re-elected once the affidavits, testimony and evidence of the Leo Frank Georgia Supreme Court records were revealed to the public (Available at The Internet Archive).
I encourage everyone to please listen to the Tom Watson 2015 centennial audiobooks Vanessa Neubauer has created from Watson’s Jeffersonian Magazine, January, March, August, September and October of 1915.
I promise you won’t be disappointed.
1. Introduction
nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/audio-book-tom-watsons-the-l...
2. Tom Watson: The Leo Frank Case
nationalvanguard.org/2015/01/tom-watson-the-leo-frank-case/
3. Tom Watson: A Full Review of the Leo Frank Case
nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/audio-book-tom-watson-a-full...
4. Tom Watson: The Celebrated Case of The State of Georgia vs. Leo Frank
nationalvanguard.org/2015/06/audio-book-the-celebrated-ca...
5. Tom Watson: The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, a Jew Pervert
nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/audio-book-tom-watsons-the-o...
6. Tom Watson: The Rich Jews Indict a State!
nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/audio-book-tom-watsons-the-r...
Tom Watson articulated the evidence, testimony and exhibits of the Leo Frank trial with such force and power it is impossible to believe Leo Frank is innocent. Listen and find out why!
Please report these audiobooks by the National Alliance to the ADL and SPLC: Thank you for helping to expose and fight against hate.
The Whitefish, Montana-based National Policy Institute (NPI), whose efforts include a campaign to make the Republican Party exclusively white, plans to hold their conference on Oct. 26th, 2013. Among its speakers will be retired Sam Dickson of the Council of Conservative Citizens and Tomislav Sunic, a former Croatian diplomat and longtime white supremacist who recently was listed as one of the instructors in the Soldiers of the Cross Training Institute, that took place Aug. 23-29th, 2013 in Harrison, AR and organized by Pastor Thom Robb's Ku Klux Klan Knights Party.
NPI, a politically-connected white supremacist organization whose leader is calling for the “European world” to adopt eugenics to prevent those like Trayvon Martin friend Rachel Jeantel from becoming humanity's future, plans to hold a conference for the second time at the Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade in Washington, DC.
NPI is listed as a hate group via the Southern Poverty Law Center. SPLC stated that "The institute has published two studies: a critique of affirmative action, which the institute opposes; and "Mass Deportation is a Viable Solution to America's Illegal Immigration Crisis," written by Edwin Rubenstein. Who happens to be affiliated with VDARE which is an anti-immigration hate organization "dedicated to preserving our historical unity as Americans into the 21st Century."
Confirmed Speakers:
ALAIN DE BENOIST is a French philosopher and social and political commentator. In 1968, he established the nationalist think-tank GRECE (“Research and Study Group for European Civilization”) and became one of the leading minds of the European “New Right” (a term Benoist does not wholeheartedly accept). His books include The Problem of Democracy, Beyond Human Rights, On Being a Pagan, as well as studies of Friedrich Nietzsche, Carl Schmitt, and Ernst Jünger.
PIERO SAN GIORGIO is a Swiss author and former businessman and software executive. For the past decade, Giorgio has dedicated himself to studying the global economic system and its dependence on ever-expanding populations, debt, and resource exploitation. His book on the fundamental unsustainable of the system was published in French to wide acclaim in both economic and “identitarian” circles; in September of this year, the English translation will appear, Survive—The Economic Collapse. Survive is both an economic and social analysis as well as a practical manual for successful, sustainable living in the “interesting times” that lie ahead.
TOMISLAV SUNIC is a Croatian-America author, translator, and former professor. He is best known for his history of the “Conservative Revolution” and European “New Right”—Against Democracy and Equality. His other works include Homo Americanus, Postmortem Report (a collection of essays), as well as other volumes in English, Croatian, and French.
Hosts:
RICHARD SPENCER is President of The National Policy Institute and Washington Summit Publishers. He was formerly an Assistant Editor at The American Conservative magazine (2007) and Editor of Taki’s Magazine (Takimag.com) (2008-2009). In 2010, he founded AlternativeRight.com and edited it for its first two years. Currently, he is Editor of Radix Journal, a biannual journal on culture and critical theory, and the host of Vanguard Radio, a weekly podcast.
ROMAN BERNARD is a French journalist and blogger. From 2007 to 2010, he edited Criticus, a widely-read political and cultural blog in France. In 2010 and 2011, he was editor-in-chief of Le Cri du Contribuable, a Paris-based monthly magazine on fiscal and financial issues. Since 2012, he has been involved at the same time with the “Identitarian” movement in Europe and the Alternative Right in America.
For more information on the National Policy Institute, there conference and VDARE you can check out:
[Leo Frank Museum and Gallery Curator: This was sent in by one of the millions of viewers of the Leo Frank collection. The views are flowing at an average of 500 to 1500 per day. With some daily spikes of over 5,000 views.]
ADL, Jewish Community and Roy Barnes' Leo Frank Clandestine Exoneration Movement
By organizing the people of Georgia into a movement to put an end to the clandestine Leo Frank exoneration movement, we were able to ensure Atlanta District Attorney Paul Howard lost his re-election bid by a landslide. You read that right, a landslide, not a tight race. The tide is changing against the Frankites centenary reign of psychological terror against the people of Georgia.
The MeToo Political Movement From Internet to the Streets of Atlanta Georgia
Going forward any Georgian politicians who express the interest in exonerating the deadly serial pedophile Leo Frank the toilet strangler, we will mobilize and reach out to the people of Georgia to make sure they lose their next election by a landslide, just like we did with Roy Barnes in the early 21st century. And just like we did in 2020 with Atlanta District Attorney Paul Howard.
Roy Barnes and His Jury Tampering Hoax
Roy Barnes reminds many Georgians of the corrupt governor John Slaton, who also betrayed the people of Atlanta in his defending of Leo Frank the toilet strangler.
Roy Barnes on Video Promoting Hate Crime Hoax About Talesmen Being Terrorized With Murder
We will be placing the links here to Atlanta's mainstream mediasphere where Roy Barnes was publicly videotaped in 2019 (11Alive) by a news crew and recorded by voice in 2019 (GPB) for the Georgia Public Broadcasting, showing him promoting a hate crime hoax about the July-August Leo Frank trial at mid-late summer 1913.
Infamous Leo Frank trial, lynching to be reexamined by new Fulton County task force
Hate Crimes Legislation in Georgia
We are grateful beyond all words that our activism got the Governor and government of Georgia to sign a Hate Crimes Criminalization Bill in the Summer of 2020, something the ADL pushed for years but couldn't get it done, yet a committee of Georgian citizens concerned about Hate Crime Hoaxes associated with the Leo Frank Case was able to get it done.
After helping to agitate to get the Georgia Assembly and Governor to finally pass a hate crimes bill, we are going to push again for them next to pass a hate crime hoax bill. It's time to put a legal stop to this criminal-like speech being promoted by ADL, Jewish activists, and Roy Barnes.
We want the State government of Georgia to criminalize Hate crime hoaxes. Hate crime hoaxes are not protected free speech. We are also seeking to have Lawyers who promote hate crime hoaxes to be disbarred. We are asking people to write letters to the members of the Assembly and call their offices to agitate for strong legislation against hate crime hoaxes.
We Calling for the nullification of the 1986 Leo Frank Pardon.
We are now calling on the people of Georgia to start a new movement to put all the people into positions of office and power in their local governments of Georgia and the state government to have the pardon of Leo Frank overturned. We the people of Georgia are no longer going to take this racist and anti-Gentile abuse and false accusations from the Jewish community, ADL, and Roy Barnes about jury tampering terrorism. We are also calling to criminalize false accusations of anti-Semitism as a form of harassment and defamation.
Enough is enough. We are tired of the centuries of Anti-Gentilism. #BlackLivesMatter #MeToo #WhitePrivilege
New Sources of the Audiobook:
The Internet Archive @ www.Archive.org
archive.org/details/@maryphagan1913
FaceBook (new):
www.facebook.com/LeoFrankTrial1913
Instagram:
www.instagram.com/maryphaganredemption/
BitChute (Upgraded):
www.bitchute.com/video/JiivKKxNG26n/
Minds.com:
www.minds.com/newsfeed/1153359187736801280?referrer=maryp...
Vimeo (PRO):
As the censorship continues the movement grows and new sources will be added.
APPENDIX
Infamous Leo Frank trial, lynching to be reexamined by the new (APRIL 26, 2019, Atlanta District Attorney Paul Howard created the Conviction Integrity Unit at the request of Roy Barnes) Fulton County task force (Roy Barnes promoting the Jury Tampering Hoax). Posted on YouTube May 7th, 2019.
YouTube: youtu.be/4tgKcqOXyhc
Research Websites
The Phagan Family Website
Source of the Audiobook
Source of the Book: Nation of Islam Research Group
The Leo Frank Archive
The Leo Frank Research Library
Other Reading:
Anti-Defamation League founded in October 1913 in the aftermath of Leo Frank's trial conviction at www.ADL.org
Dear ADL and SPLC, what was the real reason why the bona fide racist and misogynist, Leo Frank, was convicted and sentenced to death by hanging?
medium.com/@MoeJacobs/why-was-leo-frank-was-convicted-d87...
Review of the 1988 book, The Murder of Little Mary Phagan
medium.com/@MoeJacobs/audiobook-the-murder-of-little-mary...
Leo Frank Case and Jewish Censorship in the Age of Modern Revisionist Enlightenment, April 26, 2019
medium.com/@MoeJacobs/jeff-bezos-and-book-burning-secret-...
Fake News and False History: The 1913 Leo Frank Case in the Midst of a 21st-Century Jewish-Gentile Culture War.
medium.com/@MoeJacobs/the-leo-frank-case-in-the-midst-of-...
Dear Jonathan Greenblatt CEO of Anti-Defamation League, Leo Frank (1884–1915) Atlanta B’nai B’rith President (1912–1914) was not convicted or lynched because of anti-Semitism, please stop, cease and desist in using the Leo Frank case to conflate it with every tragedy that occurs in modern days and then promote racist hate crime hoaxes to serve your covertly bigoted political agenda.
medium.com/@MoeJacobs/leo-frank-was-not-convicted-because...
On Thursday, 27 October 2011, Mónica Ramírez, the director of Esperanza: The Immigrant Woman's Legal Initiative at the Southern Poverty Law Center, participated in a seminar conversation in Professor Tim Ruback's PBPL 84.4: Immigration and Security Policy at the US--Mexico Border. As an immigrant rights advocate and a lawyer with the SPLC, she helped students understand the legal challenges surrounding controversial new immigration laws. She discussed what was at stake in these immigration laws, and reflected upon the ways that challenges to these laws can impact the United States' commitments to civil rights and global responsibilities. By sharing in the conversation about immigration law, by sharing in the discussions of the policies taking effect in places like Alabama today, and by sharing her stories about her own activism and work, Ms. Ramírez illuminated the many ways in which state-sponsored immigration policies, when placed into practice, have extraordinary human rights consequences for society's most vulnerable members.
Julian Bond during his talk: "Crossing the Color Line: From Rhythm 'n' Blues to Rock 'n' Roll."
He is groovin' to "Good Rocking Tonight", written by Roy Brown and played by Wynonie Harris
Humanist and human rights scholar, Dr. Moses "Moe" Jacobs, Jewish-American historian and research scholar from metro Atlanta, Georgia, shares some of these excellent research articles on the Leo Frank case and its principals.
Fake News and False History: The 1913 Leo Frank Case in the Midst of a 21st-Century Jewish-Gentile Culture War.
Dear Jonathan Greenblatt CEO of Anti-Defamation League, Leo Frank (1884–1915) Atlanta B’nai B’rith President (1912–1914) was not convicted or lynched because of antisemitism.
Leo Frank Case and Jewish Censorship in the Age of Modern Revisionist Enlightenment, April 26, 2019
Dear ADL and SPLC, what was the real reason why the bonafide racist and misogynist, Leo Frank, was convicted and sentenced to death by hanging?
medium.com/@moejacobs/why-was-leo-frank-was-convicted-d87...
Leo Frank’s Deposition to the Atlanta Police, Monday morning, April 28, 1913
moejacobs.medium.com/leo-franks-deposition-to-the-atlanta...
Who was Jim Conley the man who helped Atlanta police solve the murder of Mary Phagan in 1913?
moejacobs.medium.com/who-was-jim-conley-3f29dd3675b9
Audiobook About the Leo Frank Case: The Murder of Little Mary Phagan authored by Mary Phagan Kean (1987) the victim’s grand-niece, Read by Vanessa Neubauer (2015), during the centennial year of Leo Frank’s lynching.
moejacobs.medium.com/audiobook-the-murder-of-little-mary-...
Source
Moses Jacobs. 2022. The Leo Frank Case. moejacobs.medium.com
Modern photo of the KKK.
The lynching of Leo Frank on August 17, 1915 -- in part -- and the film Birth of a Nation (1915) -- in significance -- inspired the re-birth of the Ku Klux Klan at midnight, November 25, 1915 (generally referred to as the second incarnation of the KKK).
The short-lived first incarnation of the Ku Klux Klan had formerly been disbanded by force in 1869, some 4 decades earlier shortly after the civil war.
Today the KKK is in terminal decline with barely a few hundred members nation-wide, though the ADL and SPLC put the number in the low thousands (they admit the organization is tattered and on its way to extinction). Most of the hate groups listed on the SPLC hate map are one-man-shows.
At the kick-off of the SPLC 40th Anniversary celebration. The talk was titled: "Celebrating a Record of Success, Affirming Our Commitment to Justice, Charting a Course for the Future"
Image and article from the controversial separatist web site www.NationalVanguard.org that promotes politically incorrect ideas. They have announced the intention of posting numerous articles about the Leo Frank trial with original testimony and photos of principals.
Warning web site has controversial images, articles and text, viewer discretion is advised. Please report the web site www.NationalVanguard.org to www.ADL.org and www.SPLC.org.
A review of Steve Oney’s book, 'And the Dead Shall Rise: The Murder of Mary Phagan and Lynching of Leo Frank'.
IN HIS 742-page magnum opus about the Leo Frank case, author Steve Oney shamelessly fails to inform the reader of who ultimately solved the Mary Phagan murder mystery in 1913.
Spoiler Alert: During the final week of his 25-day trial (July 28 - August 21, before closing arguments), Leo Frank mounted the witness stand on August 18, 1913, and made a newfangled admission to the judge and jury that amounted to a virtual murder confession.
On Monday morning, April 28, 1913, National Pencil Company factory superintendent, Leo Max Frank, was taken to the Atlanta Station-House for routine questioning during the critical first 48 hours of the Mary Phagan murder investigation. In an interrogation room, Leo Frank was flanked by his two elite lawyers, Luther Z. Rosser and Herbert Haas, and surrounded by a team of police, staff, and detectives. Leo Frank made a deposition concerning his whereabouts during Georgia Confederate Memorial Day, Saturday, April 26, 1913, and about his “brief” encounter with Mary Phagan minutes after high noon. His statements were recorded by a stenographer, Gay C. Febuary and released to the public on August 2nd, 1913 in the Atlanta Constitution.
While Leo Frank was in the hot-seat, here is how the police interrogation went:
Q. What is your position with the company?
A. I am general superintendent and director of the company.
Q: How long have you held that position?
A: In Atlanta, I have held that position since August 10th, 1908, My place of business is at 37-41 South Forsyth Street.
Q: About how many employees have you there?
A: About 107* in that plant?
Q: Male or female?
A: Mixed. I guess there are a few more girls than boys.
Q: On Saturday, April 26, I will get you to state if that was a holiday with your company?
A: Yes, sir, it was a holiday. The factory was shut down.
Several People in Building.
Q: Who was in that building during the day?
A: Well, there were several people who come in during the morning?
Q: Was anyone in the office with you up, to noon?
A: Yes, sir, the office boy [Alonzo Mann] and a stenographer.
Q: What time did they leave?
A: About 12 or a little after.
Q: Have you a day watchman there?
A: Yes, Sir.
Q: Was he on duty at 12 o'clock?
A: No, sir, he left shortly before.
Q: Who came in after the stenographer and the office boy left?
A: This little girl. Mary Phagan, but at the time I didn't know that was her name. She came in between 12:05 [pm] and 12:10 [pm], maybe 12:07 [pm], to get her pay envelope, her salary.
Frank Pays Mary Phagan:
Q: You paid her?
A: Yes, sir, and she went out of the office.
Q: What office was you in at that time?
A: In the inner office at my desk, the furtherest office to the left from the main office.
Q: Could you see the direction she went in when she left?
A: My impression was she just walked away I didn't pay any particular attention.
Q: Do you keep the door locked downstairs?
A: I didn't that morning, because the mail was coming in. I locked it at 1:10 p.m. when I went to dinner.
Q: Was anyone else in that building?
A: Yes, sir, Arthur White and Harry Denham, They were working on machinery, doing repair work, working on the top floor of the building, which is the fourth floor, toward the rear, or about the middle of the building, but a little more to the rear.
Q: What kind of work were they doing?
A: They were tightening up the belts; they are not machinists, one is a foreman in one department and the other is an assistant in another, and Denham was just assisting White, and Mrs. White, the wife of Arthur White, was also in the building. She left about 1 o'clock. I went up there and told them I was going to dinner, and they had to get out and they said they had not finished, and I said, "how long will it take?" and they said until some time in the afternoon, and then I said, "Mrs. White, you will have to go, for I am going to lock these boys in here. "
Door was Locked:
Q: Can anyone from the inside open those doors?
A: They can open the outside door, but not the inside door, which I locked.
Q: In going in the outside door, is there any way by which anyone could go in the basement from the front?
A: Yes sir, through the trap door.
Q: They would not necessarily have to go up the steps?
A: No, sir, they couldn't get up there if I was out.
Q: You locked the outer door?
A: Yes, sir, and I locked the inner door.
Q: What time did you get back?
A: At 3 o'clock, maybe two or three minutes before, and I went to the office and took off my coat and then went upstairs to tell those boys I was back, and I couldn't find them at first, they were back in the dipping room, in the rear, and I said, Are you ready? and they said, We are just read, and I said, all right, ring out when you go down, to let me know when you go out, and they rang out, and Arthur White come in the office and said, Mr. Frank, loan me $2, and I said, What's the matter? We just paid off, and he said, My wife robbed me, and I gave him $2 and he walked away, and the two of them walked out.
Newt Lee Arrives.
Q: And you locked the doors behind them?
A: I locked the outer door, when I am in there, there is no need of locking the inner door. There was only one person I was looking for to come in, and that was the nightwatchman.
Q: What time did he get there?
A: I saw him twenty minutes to 4 [3:40 p.m]
Q: Had you previously arranged for him to get there?
A: Yes, sir. On Friday night I told him, after he got his money, I gave him the keys and said you had better come around early tomorrow, because I may go to the ball game, and he came early because of that fact. I told him to be there by 4 o'clock and he came 20 minutes to 4. I figured I would leave about 1, and would not come back, but it was so cold I didn't want to risk catching cold, and I came back to the factory as I usually do. He came in, and he said, Yes, sir, and he had a bag of bananas with him, and he offered me a banana. I didn't see them, but he offered me one, and I guess he had them. We have told him, once he gets in that building never to go out. I told him he could go out, he got there so early, and I was going to be there. He came back about four minutes to 6, the reason I know that, I was putting the clock slips in, an the clock was right in front of me. I said, I will be reading in a minute, and he went downstairs and I came to the office and put on my coat and hat, and followed him and went out.
Saw Newt [Lee] and [James Milton] Gantt Talking
Q: Did you see anybody with him as you went out?
A: Yes, sir; talking to him was J.M. Gantt - a man I had fired about two weeks previous.
Q: Did you have any talk with Gantt?
A: Newt told me he wanted to go up to get a pair of shoes he left while he was working there, and Gantt said to me, Newt don't want me to go up, and he said you can go with me, Mr. Frank, and I said, that's all right, go with him Newt and I went on home and I got home about 6:25 p.m.
Q: Is there anything else that happened that afternoon?
A: No, sir, that's all I know.
Q: You don't know what time Gantt came down after he went up?
A: Oh, no, I saw him go in and I locked the door after him, but I didn't try them.
Q: Did you ask Newt?
A: Yes, sir, I telephoned him. I tried to telephone him when I got home. He punches the clock at half hour intervals, and the clock and the phone is in the office and didn't get an answer, and at 7 o'clock I called him and asked him if Gantt got his shoes, and he said yes, he got them and I said is everything all right, and he said yes, and the next thing I know they called me at 7:30 a.m. the next morning.
Did Lee Let People In?
Q: Do you know whether your watchman at any time has been in the habit of letting people in there any time?
A: No, sir.
Q: did you ever have any trouble with any watchman about such as that?
A: No, sir.
Q: Do you know whether any of your employees go there at night?
A: Yes sir, Gantt did when he was working there, he had a key and sometimes he would have some work left over. I never have seen him go but until I go out, I go out and come back, but he has come back before I left, but that is part of his duty.
Q: Did you take a bath yesterday or Saturday night?
A: Yes, sir. Saturday night at home.
Q: Did you change your clothes?
A: Yes sir.
Q: The clothes that you changed are at home?
A: Yes sir, and this is the suit of clothes I was wearing Saturday. After I left the shop I went to Jacobs Pharmacy and bought a box of candy for my wife and got home about 6:25.
Source of Question and Answer Deposition: Atlanta Constitution, August 2nd, 1913 and State Exhibit B, April 28, Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence, 1913.
Leo Frank’s statement was stenographed by a notary and government magistrate named Mr. Gay C. Febuary (Oney gets his name wrong and he was not mustachioed), and the statement became part of the official record at the Leo Frank trial, registered as State’s Exhibit B (Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence, 1913). The most important detail was that Leo Frank specifically stated that Mary Phagan had entered his second floor office on Saturday, April 26, 1913 between “12:05 pm and 12:10 pm, maybe 12:07 pm.” Leo Frank also repeatedly told the police and detectives that he never left his office on April 26, 1913 between twelve noon and 12:45 pm. However, Leo Frank’s timeline alibi would dramatically change at his trial (which took place from July 28 to August 21, 1913) on August 18, 1913, when he mounted the witness stand.
At the trial of Leo Frank for the murder of Mary Phagan, a 14-year-old girl named Monteen Stover who formerly worked at the National Pencil Company testified she had gone there to collect her pay envelope inside Leo Frank’s second-floor office on Saturday, April 26, 1913, at 12:05 p.m. and found Leo Frank’s office completely empty. Monteen Stover described waiting inside the office for five minutes (based on the wall clock), until 12:10 pm when she left because she thought the factory might have been deserted. If Monteen Stover was telling the truth, she had inadvertently broken Leo Frank’s alibi concerning his whereabouts on that fateful day. What was ironic about Monteen Stover’s testimony, is she was a positive character defense witness for Leo Frank, unlike 19 of his other associates, child laborers whose testimony suggested Leo Frank was a lecherous, licentious, lascivious, and libertine boss. They described his character for lasciviousness as bad at the Leo Frank trial, 19 girls!
Leo Frank specifically mentioned, on August 18, 1913, answering the issue of Monteen Stover finding his office empty on Saturday, April 26, 1913, between 12:05 pm and 12:10 pm — and in doing so, Leo Frank himself solved the Mary Phagan murder mystery.
During the third week of the trial, Leo Frank mounted the witness stand at 2:15 pm to make an unsworn courtroom speech to the judge and jury on the record. During Leo Frank’s four-hour trial statement, he refused to be directly examined or cross-examined by the defense and prosecution counselors, but he answered the question everyone wanted to know, by directly responding to the testimony of Monteen Stover about why his office was empty on April 26, 1913, between 12:05 pm and 12:10 pm. Leo Frank contradicted his earlier statement to the police (State's Exhibit B) and explained this five-minute absence -- by reversing himself -- with a never before heard admission that, during those crucial moments, he might have “unconsciously” gone to the bathroom in the Metal Room!
Leo Frank Mounted the Witness Stand & Told the Jury:
Now, gentlemen, to the best of my recollection from the time the whistle blew for twelve o’clock until after a quarter to one when I went upstairs and spoke to Arthur White and Harry Denham, to the best of my recollection, I did not stir out of the inner office; but it is possible that in order to answer a call of nature or to urinate I may have gone to the toilet. Those are things that a man does unconsciously and cannot tell how many times nor when he does it. Now, sitting in my office at my desk, it is impossible for me to see out into the outer hall when the safe door is open, as it was that morning, and not only is it impossible for me to see out, but it is impossible for people to see in and see me there (BOE, 1913).
It was an astounding, astonishing, jaw-dropping, and spine-tingling admission by Leo M. Frank that left everyone in the courtroom in a state of silent shock, because there was only one set of adjacent toilets located on the second floor (according to: Defendant Exhibit 61 & State Exhibit A) and it was located inside the Metal Room — the real scene of the crime according to Atlanta police and the prosecution's theory presented to the court.
Leo Frank not only put himself in the Metal Room where all the forensic evidence (hair and blood) presented by the prosecution suggested Mary Phagan had been murdered, but he put himself in the specific location at which Jim Conley testified (August 4, 1913) he found the dead body of Mary Phagan.
The newfangled explanation delivered by Leo Frank on August 18, 1913, at 2:45 pm to the judge and jury was considered the equivalent of a murder confession by his detractors, because the state’s prosecution team spent the entire duration of the four-week-long trial proving to the jury that Leo Frank murdered Mary Phagan in the Metal Room on April 26, 1913, between 12:05 pm and 12:10 pm. The prosecution suggested the basement where Mary Phagan was found by Newt Lee and thereafter first responders, was not actually where she had been initially killed.
The Second Floor Where Mary Took Her Last Steps and Breath
The Metal Room was down the hall from Leo Frank’s office, and was the place Mary Phagan had toiled for more than a year at a wage of 7.5 cents an hour (actually she earned 7 and 4/11ths cents an hour, not 10 or 12 cents an hour as modern historians have mistakenly claimed). The Metal Room was where Leo Frank went to use the bathroom each and every day, as he worked down the hall in his second-floor office at the front section of the National Pencil Company. When Leo Frank went to the bathroom each day, between the year’s time, from the Springs of 1912 and 1913 that Mary Phagan was employed and thus quite alive, he had to immediately pass by her work station within a matter of about one meter (about 3 to 4 feet) — but Leo Frank denied even knowing Mary Phagan at the trial, and it became an incriminating point of contention against him, especially since Leo Frank paid her wages every week, more than 52 times. At 55 hours a week over a six-day work week, Phagan had clocked some 2700+ hours doing boring, but psychologically intensive work inserting erasers into pencils.
August 4th, 5th and 6th, 1913
At the trial, James "Jim" Conley reported that he discovered the dead body of Phagan in the machine department (known colloquially as the Metal Room) toilet area, but it was at the behest of Leo Frank he stated, who confessed to killing her, because she wouldn't have sex with him. Conley stated that Leo Frank asked him to move her body to the basement furnace area, where garbage was normally placed, before being incinerated. It was a grim foreshadowing for what was intended for the corpse of Mary Phagan.
In the aftermath of Jim Conley’s refusing to complete the job of stuffing Mary Phagan into the furnace for $200 (and thereby cremating and destroying the evidence), Conley instead agreed to write the “death notes” pinning the bludgeoning, rape and strangulation of Mary Phagan on a tall, dark, and slim Negro named Newt Lee, the factory night watchman and security guard who had worked at the factory for less than three weeks.
Leo Frank's spur of the moment idea to create "death notes" were diabolically genius in their design, who in their right mind would ever believe an Ivy League educated Jew, Leo Frank, president of Atlanta B'nai B'rith would orchestrate such a deviously clever subplot?
The “death notes” were found next to the body of Mary Phagan, and they describe her going to “make water” in the only place she would have likely gone to “make water,” which was the women's toilet in the Metal Room at the corner section located in the very rear on the second floor. There was no bathroom accessible on the first floor and the "Earthen Closet" in the dark, dingy basement was racially segregated and therefore reserved for “Negroes Only.”
On Monday morning, April 28, 1913, a factory employee named R. P. Barret discovered a bloody tress of hair tangled on the solid metal handle of his lathe workstation located against a wall in the Metal Room, and moments later a 5-inch-wide fan-shaped bloodstain on the floor of the Metal Room in front of the girls’ dressing room next to the bathroom door. Barret testified about the forensic evidence he found, and it pointed to the same conclusion as all the other evidence the prosecution presented, that the Metal Room had been the scene of a heinous crime of violence followed by a very poor clean-up job.
As student's of the Frank case we might ask:
Why did Leo Frank orchestrate Phagan's cadaver moved 2 flights down to the basement in what turned out to be a failed effort to cover up the crime, while at the same time allowing such a very inadequate clean up job in the metal room to stand?
All of the evidence presented at the trial pointed to the Metal Room as the real scene of the crime.
Jim Conley saying he found Mary Phagan dead in the Metal Room bathroom at the behest of Leo Frank and Leo Frank saying he might have “unconsciously” gone to the bathroom in the Metal Room at the time he formerly told the police that Mary Phagan was in his office (State’s Exhibit B) with him, and at the time Monteen Stover said Leo Frank’s office was empty, resulted in the case coming together at the murder trial with absolute precision.
The Trial Went From Being A Circumstantial Case and Peculiar Mystery, to "Open and Shut!"
It was that simple, Leo Frank had entrapped himself beyond escape during his peroration on the afternoon of Monday, August 18, 1913, at 2:45 pm. Leo Frank threaded the needles eye of the prosecutions case. It was no longer a case of circumstantial evidence, after Leo Frank placed himself in the metal room bathroom at the time the prosecution theorized Phagan was murdered exactly there.
Though Leo Frank would maintain his innocence, despite his incriminating testimony, many people have naturally asked: how many times in the annals of United States legal history, has the accused made an admission on the witness stand that amounted to an unmistakable confession of guilt at his or her own murder trial? But of course, it was not a true confession, because a confession requires an open acknowledgment of guilt, whereas Leo Frank always claimed to be innocent.
If there are any doubts about Leo Frank’s August 18, 1913 "murder trial confession" (note the quotes), consider reading the March 9, 1914, Atlanta Constitution newspaper's jailhouse interview of Leo Frank, in which he reconfirms his trial testimony about a Metal Room bathroom visit to use the toilet, specifically responding to Monteen Stover’s testimony about his office being empty between 12:05 p.m. and 12:10 p.m. on Saturday, April 26, 1913.
Be sure to compare the August 2nd, 1913 and March 9th, 1914, issue of the Atlanta Constitution newspaper with State Exhibit B in the brief of evidence.
The solving of the Mary Phagan murder mystery is found in the fact that Leo Frank made the metaphorical equivalent of a public murder confession at his trial. This is also documented in the official Georgia Supreme Court Case File on Leo Frank, 1913, 1914.
No appellate tribunal called to review the Leo Frank trial brief of evidence from 1913 to 1915, and from 1982 to 1986 disturbed the unanimous verdict of the judge and jury that was originally made in late August of 1913. One may also read between the lines of political appeasement concerning the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith (ADL) sponsored Leo M. Frank posthumous pardon — without exoneration — issued on March 11, 1986. Frank has never been officially absolved of the crime for which he was tried, convicted, and sentenced to death.
We might also ask, why did the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, drop the B'nai B'rith portion of its name after Leo Frank was pardoned without exoneration of the Phagan sex murder after 1986? Coincidence?
Leo Frank
Steve Oney weaves together a fantastic collage of unsubstantiated Leo Frank hoaxes throughout his entire book And the Dead Shall Rise (2003), as part of his shameless efforts to rewrite history, exonerate Leo Frank of the Mary Phagan murder, and ultimately rehabilitate the image of Leo Frank from that of a perverted and violent pedophile, bisexual child rapist, and strangler — toward that of a kind, gentle, almost mythic stoic-martyr who was unjustly scapegoated in a vast conspiracy.
By cherry-picking and misrepresenting large parts of the case, a subtext is inserted in Oney’s book — that an innocent and well-educated Ivy League Jew named Leo Frank was ensnared by the real culprit, a semi-literate and drunken stumble-bum, the African-American factory sweeper Jim Conley.
Oney downplays the fact that Leo Frank and Jim Conley had a personal relationship that was a bit too close for comfort. Leo Frank would often goose and jolly with James “Jim” Conley at the factory. Leo Frank also managed Jim’s contracts as Conley had a side business selling watches at the factory and even ripped off a fellow employee, Mr. Arthur Pride, who testified about it at the trial. In 1912, even though Jim Conley had just served a one month sentence for drunk and disorderly behavior, Leo Frank took him back at the National Pencil Company in mid-October.
Leo Frank knew for a fact Jim Conley could write, but kept this information in confidence until it was too late. Leo Frank never said a single word about Conley to the police during the early days of the Mary Phagan murder investigation, even though the “death notes” were clearly written in Ebonics, and there were only eight African-American employees, out of 170 employees in total, working at the National Pencil Company factory. Jim Conley worked at the National Pencil Company in various capacities for two years and had even done some written inventory work for Leo Frank on several occasions.
Steve Oney never addresses why Leo Frank knowingly refused to tell the police Jim Conley could write, but Atlanta detectives found out about it when they interviewed a pawnshop owner that informed them Leo Frank was paying down from Conley's wages money owed on watch pawnshop contracts.
Leo Frank's Racist Anti-Negro Murder Framing:
What Steve Oney fails to elaborate fully for the reader is the most grotesque subplot of the bludgeoning, rape, and strangulation of Mary Phagan: its pinning on the African-American night watchman Newton “Newt” Lee an employee of three weeks. Old Newt Lee was ordered by Leo Frank on Friday, April 25 to arrive at work an hour early, 4:00 pm, on the infamous day of April 26, 1913 — so Leo Frank could go to a ball game with his brother-in-law, Mr. Ursenbach.
Oney points out in his book that weeks after Leo Frank and Jim Conley were arrested, the police arranged for them to confront each other face-to-face over the murder. Jim agreed, but Leo refused. Oney never answers the question of why an “innocent" White man and factory boss would refuse to confront an Negro employee, accusing him of strangling a 13-year old employee, in the context of the White racial separatist south of 1913, where the word of a Black man would almost never be taken over the word of a White man.
Though Steve Oney claims he spent 17 years of his life traveling the country to research and write this colorful and thesaurus-enriched book, his analysis is shallow and myopic at best. Oney tends to wear blinders and drives with the emergency brakes on during his epic 700+ page journey, and, as a result, he does not plumb the depths of the case, or soar above its centenary heights, leaving the reader truly frustrated, unsatisfied, and unfulfilled. No real modern forensic analysis is applied to this case by Oney despite the hundreds of documents surviving into the 21st century, including crime scene and autopsy descriptions by architects, police, detectives, undertakers, and physicians. Oney does, however, fill his book with every crackpot theory ever advanced on behalf of Leo Frank’s defense, regardless of whether or not the inclusions stand up to even minimal scrutiny.
Pierre van Paassen, who, in addition to penning some rather incredible tales about the Leo Frank case, also claimed to have seen poltergeist ghostly black dogs which could appear and disappear at will and cause animals to have heart attacks and die.
One of the biggest frauds Oney perpetuates was originally fabricated by the tabloid-style journalist Pierre van Paassen in his book To Number Our Days, published in 1964. In this 404-page work, van Paassen spends less than two pages (pp. 237-8) recalling an incident that happened in 1922, at a time when he was in Atlanta, Georgia, working as a journalist for the Atlanta Constitution, and investigating the then almost decade-old Leo Frank Case.
To Number Our Days, by Pierre van Paassen, chapter: “Short Stand in Dixieland,” page 237, line 27:
“The Jewish community of Atlanta at that time seemed to live under a cloud. Several years previously one of its members, Leo Frank, had been lynched as he was being transferred from the Fulton Tower Prison in Atlanta to Milledgeville for trial on a charge of having raped and murdered a little girl in his warehouse which stood right opposite the Constitution building. Many Jewish citizens who recalled the lynching were unanimous in assuring me that Frank was innocent of the crime.
“I took to reading all the evidence pro and con in the record department at the courthouse. Before long I came upon an envelope containing a sheaf of papers and a number of X-ray photographs showing teeth indentures. The murdered girl had been bitten on the left shoulder and neck before being strangled. But the X-ray photos of the teeth marks on her body did not correspond with Leo Frank’s set of teeth of which several photos were included. If those photos had been published at the time of the murder, as they should have been, the lynching would probably not have taken place.
“Though, as I said, the man died several years before, it was too late, I thought, to rehabilitate his memory and perhaps restore the good name of his family. I showed Clark Howell the evidence establishing Frank’s innocence and asked permission to run a series of articles dealing with the case and especially with the evidence just uncovered. Mr. Howell immediately concurred, but the most prominent Jewish lawyer in the city, Mr. Harry Alexander, whom I consulted with a view to have him present the evidence to the grand jury, demurred. He said Frank had not even been tried. Hence no new trial could be requested. Moreover, the Jewish community in its entirety still felt nervous about the incident. If I wrote the articles, old resentments might be stirred up and, who knows some of the unknown lynchers might recognize themselves as participants in my description of the lynching. It was better, Mr. Alexander thought, to leave sleeping lions alone. Some local rabbis were drawn into the discussion and they actually pleaded with Clark Howell to stop me from reviving interest in the Frank case as this was bound to have evil repercussions on the Jewish community.
“That someone had blabbed out of school became quite evident when I received a printed warning saying: ‘Lay off the Frank case if you want to keep healthy.’ The unsigned warning was reinforced one night, or rather, early one morning when I was driving home. A large automobile drove up alongside of me and forced me into the track of a fast-moving streetcar coming from the opposite direction. My car was demolished, but I escaped without a scratch…. “
Van Paassen’s account of these events that allegedly happened more than four decades before is faulty in several particulars. Dental X-ray forensics were in their infancy in 1913, and never used in Georgia for any murder case until countless years after Leo Frank was hanged. Is it “Mr. Harry Alexander” or Henry Alexander? And why would the attorney who represented Leo Frank during his numerous appeals say Leo Frank didn’t have his murder trial yet? Leo Frank was not lynched on his way to trial or prison in late June 1915; he was lynched 170 miles away in Marietta on August 17, 1915. Bite marks on Mary Phagan’s left shoulder and neck? None of the numerous examinations or autopsies of Mary Phagan conducted by the undertaker, police, detectives, and physicians reported in the official record and newspapers mention any bite marks on Mary Phagan’s shoulder, neck or anywhere else on her body. Van Paassen also claims an attempt was made on his life by forcing him into a head-on collision with a streetcar in which his car was demolished, but he escaped without a scratch — all this in 1922 when there were virtually no safety features to speak of in automobiles.
The definitive book on the Leo Frank case has yet to be written. Perhaps it’s time for Steve Oney to re-read and carefully study the 1,800-page Georgia Supreme Court file on Leo M. Frank, and put out a new edition of his book without all the easily-verified misrepresentations, fabrications, half-truths, omissions, and sloppy research.
Source: www.NationalVanguard.org
*107 is likely a typo, the correct number was 170.
Please report this hate speech to the Jewish ADL and Jewish SPLC:
Pittsburgh: University President Makes it Clear – We Will Produce Leo Frank Play and Do Anything Else You Tell Us to Do nationalvanguard.org/2020/04/pittsburgh-university-presid...
Pittsburgh: Leo Frank Play “Postponed Indefinitely” After Protests nationalvanguard.org/2020/01/pittsburgh-leo-frank-play-po...
The Exoneration of Leo Frank is Coming and Nothing Can Stop It nationalvanguard.org/2019/05/the-exoneration-of-leo-frank...
Vanessa Neubauer’s Audio Books on the Leo Frank Case nationalvanguard.org/2019/04/vanessa-neubauers-audio-book...
We Need Reporters at Leo Frank Event nationalvanguard.org/2018/08/we-need-reporters-at-leo-fra...
103 Years After Leo Frank’s Execution nationalvanguard.org/2018/08/103-years-after-leo-franks-e...
New Audio Book: The American Mercury on Leo Frank – Judge Leonard Roan’s Charge to the Jury nationalvanguard.org/2017/11/new-audio-book-the-american-...
100 reasons Leo Frank is Guilty nationalvanguard.org/2017/09/new-audio-book-the-american-...
Leo Frank Takes the Stand and tells the jury he "Unconsciously" went to the toilet at the exact time Mary Phagan was murdered in the toilet. nationalvanguard.org/2017/08/new-audio-book-the-american-...
Making a Martyr out of a Murderer nationalvanguard.org/2017/04/leo-frank-making-a-martyr/
Click all the numbered pages. Numerous pages of Hate Speech on the Leo Frank Case (click the link and scroll down to the bottom of the page to see numbers 1 through 10+)
[ Warning: National Vanguard (NV) is a politically incorrect news and research website, please report this NV article to the Jewish watchdog organizations ADL and SPLC. Hopefully we can get Internet Service Providers (ISPs) around the world to block or censor the website www.NationalVanguard.org ]
Photo acquired from National Vanguard www.NationalVanguard.org
American Dissident Voices broadcast of July 25, 2015
Listen to the broadcast or download the radio program
by Kevin Alfred Strom
2015 IS THE YEAR of Jewish failure to contain and control the Leo Frank narrative, a narrative they very much want to control in this, the 100th year after Frank’s death. For in the case of Leo Frank we find century-old confirmation of a pattern — a pattern of Jewish sexual license, Jewish racial solidarity even in the case of a Jewish murderer, Jewish corruption of American law and government via money and via media control, and unrelenting use of that media control to distort our history and pervert the truth.
Next month is the 100th anniversary of the carrying out of the sentence of death by hanging imposed by the courts on the Jewish sex killer Leo Max Frank by a group of prominent Georgia men who were outraged by the commutation of his sentence by a corrupt governor, and last month was the 100th anniversary of that commutation. That Governor’s name, which will live forever as an example of subservience to Jewish power and Jewish propaganda, was John Marshall Slaton (pictured above).
Here’s what happened:
In 1913, the Atlanta president of the Jewish B’nai B’rith, sweatshop operator Leo M. Frank, was convicted of strangling to death a 13-year-old White girl in his employ — Mary Phagan — after sexually assaulting her while they were alone on the second floor of the National Pencil Company, of which Frank was the superintendent and part-owner. Jewish hyper-ethnocentrism, networking, and financial and press power came into play almost immediately after Frank’s arrest and indictment.
The case became a national cause celebre for the Jews, with headlines in major newspapers from Chicago to San Francisco to New York City, trumpeting Frank’s “innocence” and the barbarity of the White Southerners who dared to convict him. Fat-headed Whites who believed the fictional newspaper stories of the “persecuted” member of “God’s Chosen” were recruited to help in the crusade, and the equivalent of many millions of dollars was raised in his defense.
With this Jewish money, Frank hired the finest and most expensive team of lawyers ever seen in the state of Georgia, yet he was still held by the Coroner’s Jury — still charged by the Grand Jury — and still convicted at trial. He hired another expensive legal team — and then another, even including the leading Jewish lawyers in the USA — and appealed his conviction to the Georgia Court of Appeals and then to the Supreme Court of the United States. In every case, his conviction was upheld.
With this Jewish money, other things were procured as well: Someone planted a bloody shirt at the home of the factory’s Black night watchman, Newt Lee, at a time when both Lee and Frank were suspects in the killing. Someone paid a long list of witnesses to leave town or change their stories in ways that favored Frank. Someone paid an unscrupulous attorney named Felder to fraudulently present himself as working for the Phagan family and attempt to illegally obtain evidence and documents in the possession of the police. Someone paid a Pinkerton detective named W.D. McWorth — and the Pinkertons were openly in the pay of Leo Frank and the other Jewish owners of the pencil factory — to later “discover” a bloody club and what was said to be part of Mary Phagan’s pay envelope near the ground floor elevator where the factory’s Black sweeper, Jim Conley, was keeping watch for Leo Frank that day — but when the contrived plants were uncovered as fakes, Pinkerton agent McWorth was dismissed. Someone paid the Pinkertons’ great rivals — the infamous Burns detective agency — to take over when the Pinkertons refused to “cooperate” as the Jews had hoped, and in particular refused to withhold evidence from the police until Leo Frank’s attorneys had had a look at it.
And, in 1915, when all the appeals had failed and the integrity of the jury’s verdict that Leo Frank was guilty and that Leo Frank should hang had been upheld by every jury, every judge, and every court with jurisdiction over the case, there was only one place left for the Jews to try: the outgoing Governor of Georgia, John Slaton. In addition to their glittering wealth and generous largesse, the pro-Frank forces had another ace up their sleeve with John M. Slaton: He was a leading partner in the partly-Jewish law firm that defended Leo Frank and had been so for many months. Even though he could not practice law while governor during his term of two years, for some reason or other the law firm that was defending Frank — and which doubtless was receiving a huge portion of the money raised in Frank’s defense and would receive even more as “bonuses” for each desired outcome attained — sought out Governor-elect Slaton as a partner in May 1913.
With Leo Frank’s execution date imminent and all appeals exhausted, and with Governor Slaton leaving office in just days to be replaced by a man without such connections, the time was now or never. One would think that an ethical governor would have nothing to do with, and would not even consider, interfering in the case of a man who was a client of his own law firm, especially when the issue could be handled by the incoming governor, who had no conflict of interest, and who would be in office in less than a week. You would think that a rational governor would know that his political career — and Slaton very much wanted to be become United States Senator from Georgia — would be over for life if he committed such an ethical lapse. It would take some kind of overwhelming consideration for a man in Slaton’s position to interfere in the Frank case. But interfere he did.
On June 21, giving a patently specious string of reasons, he commuted the death sentence of Leo Frank to life in prison. He said his conscience impelled him and that he could not live with himself if there was even the possibility that he would have the blood of an innocent man on his hands. That, if true — though it hardly sounds like the reasoning process of the same man who blithely ignored the commutation requests of several non-Jews while in office — would truly constitute an overwhelming consideration. But you will forgive me when I tell you that the evidence suggests an overwhelming “consideration” of a quite different kind.
Attorney Luther Z. Rosser, lead counsel for Leo Frank, who had argued his case before the jury, paid a very interesting visit to the home of his law partner Governor Slaton just before the commutation decision was made. For reasons which might not seem too obscure, he arrived late at night. For the same reasons, he approached the mansion by a back street, parked several blocks away, and entered the grounds on foot via a dark alley. He did not leave until well after midnight.
I quote from Watson’s The Celebrated Case of Leo Frank:
What Rosser said to Slaton in this clandestine meeting, will never be known; but it was noticed that next day the lamentations of the Jews were replaced by sly grins, and offers to bet ten to one that Slaton would commute!
Read the following, not as evidence of Frank’s guilt, or as proof of Slaton’s hypocrisy and perfidy, but as a side-light on events in Atlanta:
Atlanta, June 22.
Mr. Tom Watson:
What I tell you I know to be true as God is light, and it is this: The Jews all gathered at the home of the Seligs, on Washington Street, where Frank’s wife and father-in-law live, and from 8 till 12 o’clock, they had a regular old-time Belshazzar feast. They drank wine, high balls, whiskey and beer, and smoked and sang, and had music; and there were not less than a hundred and twenty automobiles full of Jews that came there from the time I say to the late hour.
Now, they all knew Slaton had commuted Frank, and were celebrating it.
And I know a policeman who was on the streets yesterday, to make out like controlling the mob, and he told me he passed the jail every night at 12 o’clock for a year, and going on duty, and never saw a light in the office of the Sheriff till Saturday night, and he was surprised to see the Sheriff sitting there like he was waiting for somebody, and suddenly a Jew came running up and tapped on the window, and the Sheriff raised the window and the Jew whispered to him, and the Sheriff smiled, and then the Jew ran off and the Sheriff closed the window. Now, that showed conspiracy, and that Slaton was working with the Jews all the time.
In other words, the Jews knew — some on Friday, and some on Saturday — that Slaton had commuted the sentence.
John Slaton did not announce his commutation order until Sunday.
After you hear my words and read the sources I have provided on the Frank case, I invite you to watch the NBC television program about John M. Slaton, from their 1964 series Profiles in Courage. I’ll embed the video from that program so you can watch it right here on nationalvanguard.org:
After watching that production, do you recognize John Slaton? — do you recognize the Leo Frank sex killing case? — do you recognize the people of Georgia? No. You cannot. The program — like almost all Establishment works on the Leo Frank case — is a vicious, poisonous cocktail of lies designed to obscure the truth, exonerate and even ennoble a murderer, make the odious and the sleazy into “heroes,” and demonize the real heroes — real heroes like Tom Watson.
Thomas E. Watson’s contemporary series of exposés on the corruption and mendacity of the Leo Frank machine is one of the classics of American muckraking. Watson was an intelligent, cultured, and literate man, author of highly-regarded biographies of Jackson and Jefferson and a history of France. In the NBC episode, he is played by a sweaty, greasy-looking Hollywood “heavy” Michael Constantine, who, as Watson, openly admits his corruption and talks in “cracker” dialect, wearing a heavily rumpled suit without a tie, putting his feet up on Slaton’s desk, and wiping his dripping nose on his sleeve. We get it, Mr. Director, we get it. No such meeting between Watson and Slaton ever took place.
The program is anything but subtle. In the opening scene, another sweaty White man, with a crazed look on his face and a very bad set of teeth, stands on the courthouse roof and screams for the head of Leo Frank to a torch-lit crowd of Whites while the Frank verdict is about to be read. No such rally ever took place — it is an invention of the filmmakers.
Inside the courthouse, Judge Roan, the presiding judge in the case, mutters to an associate that “Frank’s innocence has been proven to a mathematical certainty” — something that he never said.
The noble Slaton is played by Jewish actor Walter Matthau, and Slaton is portrayed as a deeply moral man of principle throughout. The screen Watson admits to the screen Slaton that Watson’s newspaper, the Jeffersonian, is “written for the great unwashed,” and that “you bathe too much.”
Almost unbelievably, the program asserts that the Black night watchman and early suspect, Newt Lee, was in the pencil factory building when the murder was committed — and that the factory sweeper Jim Conley, another Black man falsely accused by the pro-Frank forces, confessed to the murder to his own attorney. Needless to say, none of this ever happened.
Jewish screenwriter Don Mankiewicz was the author of this bundle of lies. It was made by Saudek Associates, and aired on Robert Sarnoff’s Jewish-owned NBC. The executive in charge of production was the Jew Bernie Weinraub.
The producers of this program were so sloppy — and so contemptuous of their viewers, who they evidently think will believe even the crudest and most obvious lies — that they even get Leo Max Frank’s name wrong, calling him “Leo A. Frank.”
Thus is history rewritten by liars. Thus is the public fooled into hating those who try to save them, and worshipping those, like John M. Slaton, who have sold them out.
It is satisfying to reflect upon the fact that John M. Slaton, quite contrary to the liars at NBC, was so reviled for his act of evil that he had to flee the state. He did not return to stay for nearly a decade. Tom Watson was elected to the Senate seat that Slaton had coveted, and it was only recently that the Jews were able to force the great writer and statesman’s statue to be removed from the state capitol.
I’ll speak again about the Leo Frank case in three weeks, on the centenary of that moment in US and Georgia history when the leading citizens of that state re-took control of the legal and judicial process and carried out the sentence of the court — the sentence of the judge — and the sentence of the people — on Jewish sex killer Leo Max Frank.
* * *
You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at Whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. You can join and support us by visiting natall.com — or write to National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.
Radio Source:
Governor John Slaton and the Leo Frank Case, July 2015
nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/governor-john-slaton-and-the...
References:
Video: John Slaton Profiles in Courage 1964 archive.org/details/ProfilesInCourageJohnSlaton
Watson's Magazine (five) issues January, March, August, September and October, 1915.
Learn more about Governor John Slaton by reading the 'Leo Frank Georgia Supreme Court Records'
Evidence of Governor John Slaton's law firm merging with Luther Zeigler Rosser's law firm and thus defending Leo Frank at trial can be found in Atlanta City Directory, 1913, 1914, 1915, 1916. These items are available at The Internet Archive.
Governor John Slaton's 29 page commutation order on Leo Frank's behalf at Flickr.com
YouTube
www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhHgTuSe294
twitter.com/MaryPhagan1913/status/1297226218857803776
GAB
gab.com/murderoflittlemaryphagan/posts/104734270472388210
MINDS
www.minds.com/newsfeed/1143965746430783488?referrer=maryp...
BITCHUTE
www.bitchute.com/video/ojuZEFFOZMQk/
Facebook (censored on Mark Zuckerberg's platform), in response we are going to seek a Black Lives Matter boycott of the social media giant. #BlackLivesMatter #MeToo #BLM
WWW: www.Facebook.com (banned)
The Internet Archive
archive.org/details/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-...
The Phagan Family Website
Source of the Audiobook
Source of the Book
Other Reading:
Anti-Defamation League founded in October 1913 in the aftermath of Leo Frank's trial conviction at www.ADL.org
Dear ADL and SPLC, what was the real reason why the bona fide racist and misogynist, Leo Frank, was convicted and sentenced to death by hanging?
medium.com/@MoeJacobs/why-was-leo-frank-was-convicted-d87...
Review of the 1988 book, The Murder of Little Mary Phagan
medium.com/@MoeJacobs/audiobook-the-murder-of-little-mary...
Leo Frank Case and Jewish Censorship in the Age of Modern Revisionist Enlightenment, April 26, 2019
medium.com/@MoeJacobs/jeff-bezos-and-book-burning-secret-...
Fake News and False History: The 1913 Leo Frank Case in the Midst of a 21st-Century Jewish-Gentile Culture War.
medium.com/@MoeJacobs/the-leo-frank-case-in-the-midst-of-...
Dear Jonathan Greenblatt CEO of Anti-Defamation League, Leo Frank (1884–1915) Atlanta B’nai B’rith President (1912–1914) was not convicted or lynched because of anti-Semitism, please stop, cease and desist in using the Leo Frank case to conflate it with every tragedy that occurs in modern days and then promote racist hate crime hoaxes to serve your covertly bigoted political agenda.
medium.com/@MoeJacobs/leo-frank-was-not-convicted-because...
At the kick-off of the SPLC 40th Anniversary celebration. The talk was titled: "Celebrating a Record of Success, Affirming Our Commitment to Justice, Charting a Course for the Future"
[Editor note: Apologies for this politically incorrect post, but it is presented to highlight the growing conflict between Leo Frank's detractors and defenders. Trigger warning: insensitive language is used in this description. The purpose of this post is to show the continued conflict between Leo Frank's defenders and detractors more than a century after the case came to its conclusion August 17, 1915. Permission granted by Leo Frank Research Library to republish this post. This post is for informational purposes only. -- Leo Frank Case Flickr Curator]
Analysis from Leo Frank Research Library of a Southern Poverty Law Center short-film about the Leo Frank.
This is a 3 minute shortened preview of an 8 minute 46 seconds racist Anti-Gentile propaganda documentary about the Leo Frank Case by the Jewish-American Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) an anti-White Jewish supremacist activist organization.
In the narration during the early part of the propaganda documentary you can hear the voice of Leonard Dinnerstein, a long time Jewish activist who has written a number of racist anti-Gentile propaganda works on the Leo Frank case.
Full Length Source of the SPLC Anti-Gentile AgitProp Published on Sep 17, 2016 by Kevin Williams:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbd8qJzIX6Q
Further Reading:
The Leo Frank Case (Book) by Leonard Dinnerstein www.amazon.com/Frank-Case-Brown-Thrasher-Books/product-re...
Leo Frank Case Articles at American Heritage Magazine, October, 1996 by Leonard Dinnerstein and Jacob Goldfarb
archive.org/details/leo-frank-american-heritage-article-o...
Bueno mis amigos y enemigos, algun dia tenia que ser. Somos todo trabajadores de un via u otra. Yo cosecho vegetales, frutas y demas. El sol pega y la espalda duele. Pero entre todo he conocido mucha gente que viene a este pais ilegalemente o bajo cierto acuerdo no muy beneficioso.
Soy miembro del Southern Poverty Law Center que anda celebrando el 50 aniversario del discurso de Martin Luther King. (Cuando tuvo un Sueño) Ellos querian que todos celebraran nuestros lechos y deseos.
Well, you got me here. In my best seasonal working gear. This image is for the Southern Poverty Law Center's 50th MLK (I have a dream) commemoration.. The SPLC wanted all its member to provide some image of what they still march on. Thus this image. Not too far from reality.
In the early part of the Spring semester of 1988, the President of Western Kentucky University, Kern Alexander, announced that he wanted to install faculty editors at the WKU student newspaper, the College Heights Herald, and the WKU yearbook, the Talisman. Both publications were entirely student run. These editors would control what students were able to publish, and have the power to stop any story or photo from being published. He also wanted to require students to take a class if they wanted to work at either publication, and then limit how many semesters students could work at the publications. Most everyone agreed that Dr. Alexander's motivation was that he did not like the idea of an adversarial press, and that he was angry that the paper had uncovered that his wife would not be joining him at WKU and that he was getting a divorce. He denied those were the reasons. WKU students rebelled at the idea of faculty control of the student publications - and the rebellion was organized in my living room. I wasn’t on the Herald staff anymore - I'd left after my junior year - which gave me the freedom to participate in the protest and feed information to the three main organizers of the protest, the first at WKU in many, many years. I typed up (yes, on a typewriter) a timeline to show exactly how this attempted takeover happened, paid Kinkos for a lot of copies, and distributed it all over campus. I found out later that the office of student affairs was furious and wanted to find the author. I guess they wanted to give me a strong talking to. Not all students liked the Herald - but the idea of the President putting in editorial control was too much to stomach. The march was fabulous, it was huge, it got national coverage, and Alexander resigned shortly thereafter. Alexander has managed to scrub most information about this protest from the Internet, and since it was pre-Internet, the media coverage of the controversy isn't online, but you can read all about it here, on pages 13-14: issuu.com/splc/docs/v9n2-spring88
Yes, that's me at the protest, wearing my Les Miserables t-shirt I had bought in London. I was ready to build barricades and sing! It was either late March or April 1988. I was ready to build barricades and sing! I'm holding hands with Todd Link. Art Elrod is next to him, in a blue shirt. Mike Sprouse, with the big hair, is next to him.
For the meaning of "1488" ,see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteen_Words. I'm more upset to see this in the neighborhood than I am to see the people smoking crack. I'm Jewish, and there are a lot of people of color and LGBT people in my neighborhood.
I have reported this sighting to the Southern Poverty Law Center by submitting the link to this page at their website. To report evidence of hate activity in your neighborhood at that site, click to www.splcenter.org/center/contact.jsp, fill out the online form, and select as a subject "Report hate activity in your community". To report actual hate incidents, click to www.splcenter.org/center/petitions/standstrong/ and click on the "Report Hate Incidents". button.
(7/21/09) I have now also contacted the Anti-Defamation League, at www.adl.org/contact_us.asp?s=topmenu. To report incidents of antisemitism, other racism, and other hate-based violence or threats, click on this link, fill out the online form, choose "Other" as "Topic of Inquiry", and fill out "Comments/Questions" box as appropriate.
I do think ADL's and SPLC;s use of the term "extremist" is unfortunate, as some movements seen as "extremist" in their day, such as the Abolitionist movement, proved to be right. I'd have preferred "racist groups" or "hate groups". Also the Medvedev/Putin regime in Russia has been suppressing political dissent there by invoking "anti-extremism" laws. Only some of the dissenters involved have been members of hate groups.
See also www.adl.org/hate_symbols/default.asp for the main page of ADL's index of racist symbols. These include the "Celtic Cross" seen above..
In the early part of the Spring semester of 1988, the President of Western Kentucky University, Kern Alexander, announced that he wanted to install faculty editors at the WKU student newspaper, the College Heights Herald, and the WKU yearbook, the Talisman. Both publications were entirely student run. These editors would control what students were able to publish, and have the power to stop any story or photo from being published. He also wanted to require students to take a class if they wanted to work at either publication, and then limit how many semesters students could work at the publications. Most everyone agreed that Dr. Alexander's motivation was that he did not like the idea of an adversarial press, and that he was angry that the paper had uncovered that his wife would not be joining him at WKU and that he was getting a divorce. He denied those were the reasons. WKU students rebelled at the idea of faculty control of the student publications - and the rebellion was organized in my living room. I wasn’t on the Herald staff anymore - I'd left after my junior year - which gave me the freedom to participate in the protest and feed information to the three main organizers of the protest, the first at WKU in many, many years. I typed up (yes, on a typewriter) a timeline to show exactly how this attempted takeover happened, paid Kinkos for a lot of copies, and distributed it all over campus. I found out later that the office of student affairs was furious and wanted to find the author. I guess they wanted to give me a strong talking to. Not all students liked the Herald - but the idea of the President putting in editorial control was too much to stomach. The march was fabulous, it was huge, it got national coverage, and Alexander resigned shortly thereafter. Alexander has managed to scrub most information about this protest from the Internet, and since it was pre-Internet, the media coverage of the controversy isn't online, but you can read all about it here, on pages 13-14: issuu.com/splc/docs/v9n2-spring88
Yes, that's me at the protest, wearing my Les Miserables t-shirt I had bought in London. I was ready to build barricades and sing! It was either late March or April 1988. I think my sign says, "And seven days later, Kern speaks!", because he had been silent about the growing controversy and then suddenly emerged and feigned complete surprise that people were upset. Todd Link is to my left.
At the kick-off of the SPLC 40th Anniversary celebration. The talk was titled: "Celebrating a Record of Success, Affirming Our Commitment to Justice, Charting a Course for the Future"
Rockville Maryland, June 27, 2023. A huge group (1,000?) of mainly African American and Muslim folks gathered at the Board Of Education to protest LGBTQ+ education in Montgomery County MD public schools. They are advocating to restore an 'opt out' policy. That means that if a teacher assigns reading material that parents object to, the student does not have to participate. The main organizers of today's protest seemed to be white activists associated with intolerant right wing outfits including the SPLC* designated hate group Moms For Liberty. Also present were the shadowy Family Rights For Religious Freedom*** and The Coalition For Virtue**. Sadly, there also seemed to be major buy-in from Muslim groups I respect that should know better. Inside the BOE there was testimony about MoCo's policies both pro and con but the general public was largely excluded for understandable security reasons.
A small contingent of my Rainbow Brigade friends were on hand for a dance party to show support for our LGBTQ+ neighbors. Although one of the white male right wing speakers claimed that there was physical conflict initiated by the Rainbows this was not the case. I've attended and photographed a fair number of Rainbow events and I can report that Rainbow protectors are well trained in peaceful de-escalation techniques. In fact, one of the folks here today actually took a punch from a Proud Boy and just turned the other cheek. Thankfully he has healed and continues to show up to support his community with skill and grace.
*Southern Poverty Law Center
**Said to be a Muslim group, established 2023?
***Also Muslim focused, established 2023? No names? Why?
Rochelle Conner read a statement from Scott Lively of Abiding Truth Ministries at an anti-gay press conf in Jan 2012 calling for "God himself to destroy" the Southern Poverty Law Center
Conner also claimed the SPLC should now be called the “Southern Poverty Hate Center” as it has “now become a tool of the God-haters”
Timothy Johnson also spoke then
www.rightwingwatch.org/content/aftah-and-allies-ask-god-d...
More on Lively
www.rightwingwatch.org/category/people/scott-lively
Conner was introduced as being from a non-profit, God and Government - she wrote about the SPLC press conf on her blog
godandgovt.wordpress.com/2012/01/21/standing-against-the-...
A Stand up for Religious Freedom rally to protest President Obama's policy of providing government funding for contraceptives was held at the San Francisco Federal Building
A blog post on the rally from a conservative statistician
There was a larger rally in June
johnmalloysdb.blogspot.com/2012/06/i-can-not-i-must-not-i...
20 of these photos (including a couple of Johnson) are at (and easily available to license)
www.demotix.com/news/1537406/stand-religious-freedom-rall...
And 6 are on Corbis (and easily available to license
www.corbisimages.com/stock-photo/rights-managed/42-377434...
www.corbisimages.com/stock-photo/rights-managed/42-377434...
www.corbisimages.com/stock-photo/rights-managed/42-377433...
www.corbisimages.com/stock-photo/rights-managed/42-377432...
www.corbisimages.com/stock-photo/rights-managed/42-377432...
www.corbisimages.com/stock-photo/rights-managed/42-377433...
At the kick-off of the SPLC 40th Anniversary celebration. The talk was titled: "Celebrating a Record of Success, Affirming Our Commitment to Justice, Charting a Course for the Future"
[Leo Frank Case Flickr Curator: Emailed in by Leo Frank scholar, Raymond, on the Mary Phagan murder anniversary, April 26, 2020. From book to audiobook to "flat-image video format" whatever that means. I guess the audiobook is now in file formats so that these audiobooks can be uploaded to video-media share websites. The email correspondence speaks for itself. ]
The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Volume 3, The Leo Frank Case the Lunching of a Guilty Man (CENSORED ON AMAZON, 2019).
It's the definitive book on the Leo Frank case, hands down, 103 years after the fact. It was powerfully published the anniversary of Mary Phagan's rape-murder, on April 26, 2016, in the immediate aftermath of the 2013-2015 double-strangulation murder centennials. Big media went into a foaming at the mouth frenzy.
Racist Anti-Black Outrage: February, 2019, Black History Month, the Ultimate Betrayal by Jewry and White America Against the First Amendment
During Black history month, February 2019, the racist anti-black, bullying Jewish community and their alphabet soup pressure groups which masquerade as civil rights groups, pressed hard and pressured Jeff Bezos and his big tech giant and trillion dollar behemoth to have it removed from Amazon Books. We call on all 1.5 billion people of African descent in the world to learn how White supremacy works by listening to this audiobook and buying a physical copy of the book for all your friends and family at the Nation of Islam Website. Look it up, don't be lazy! Control DEE to bookmark. Subscribe. And Learn. Join. Calling on all 1 Million of the 40 million African-Americans in the U.S.A, right now to join the Nation of Islam. We need you. We will never allow them to control who sees and reads our books again. Calling on Black Activists, NOW!
A Message to the DNC, U.S. Congress and President Trump
We call on POTUS Donald Trump and the United States of America Government to have Amazon.com Google.com YouTube.com Microsoft.com Twitter.com and all the other Tech Titans broken up, they have a dangerous oligopoly, one dangerous to our democracy, read-MONOPOLY on the flow of news, data, information, knowledge, media, books, audiobooks, video and entertainment. They have unprecedented international level power to control information, at the level of transnational companies, acting like transnational governments.
Oligopoly Media and Internet Control
90% of mainstream news media companies are in few too many hands, it's a new kind of dystopian good ole boys network of global plutocrats.
When Jewish Supremacists, Censorship Mongers, their craven puppet politicians and big tech giants, can stop ordinary people from communicating to the public, we call for a movement from top to bottom, grass roots to US federal government to stop this censorship. If big tech companies in the hands of a few White men can stop free speech, it hurts us all. Please BREAK THEM UP. PLEASE BREAK THEM UP.
We are calling for the ADL and SPLC to be broken up by the U.S. Government since they are in direct partnership with big tech companies and getting books, audiobooks, and videos censored, more than 20 million and counting. This is a crisis, a constitutional crisis when the number of people at the top of these big tech companies are limited. We need a new democracy, where plutocrats merged with groups who are masquerading as Civil Rights groups like ADL and SPLC.
We call on the government to break of Civil Rights groups who work to subvert the first amendment with code words like hate speech. We are calling on every politician and government official in the United States to listen to the audiobook of The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Volume 3, The Leo Frank Case the Lynching of a Guilty Man, and should these tech giants have the power to deplatform, shadowban, censor, suppress and FULLY CENSOR our book.
WE CALLING FOR A FIRST AMEMDMENT REVOLUTION NOW.
BOOM! BOOYAH!
Now in audiobook format (May 2020):
Read By Vanessa Neubauer of The American Mercury in 2018-2019, made into a flat-image video-audiobook, May, 2020.
Flat-Image Video Form in 2020 (Please download and share): archive.org/details/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-...
The simple audiobook version from 2018: archive.org/details/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-...
Original Source: The American Mercury www.theamericanmercury.org
20-Something hours of old fashioned scholarly research is presented by voice!
TUNE IN NOW.