View allAll Photos Tagged Normalizes
3264
2448
pixel
-1728707843
311
1
0.310
0.078
normalized
0.355
0.104
Face
-1728707843
255
2
0.366
0.069
normalized
0.462
0.092
Face
How do you change MKV Media Contrast Normalize Clip contrast example without ffmpeg command in Win7 10 Computer.
3264
2448
pixel
1551505303
161
1
0.558
0.066
normalized
0.531
0.087
Face
1551505303
265
0.483
0.069
normalized
0.422
0.092
Face
1. SI: People have learned to normalize the bad state of streets and communal spaces, leading to a scarcity of caring to fix them.
2. Materials: Planting area with weeds filled with poop.
3. Idea: This planter is full of dog poop, which means both the church and the dog owners don't pick it up.
4. Process: The poop is clearly shown in this shot and wrapped in a bed of weeds.
On the left, a visualization of four source files from our "old school" programming department... on the right, four source files from the "new school."
The graph height (normalized across all the graphs, hence the lack of y-axis labels) represents indentation level at any given source code line (denoted by the x-axis labels).
Our "old school" code has an *immense* problem of both being far too verbose per file (8000 lines? Seriously?) and far, *far* too complex per function. The comparison is a bit contrived, as our new codebase lacks even a single 8000-line file, but I've thrown in one of the "ugliest" source files in our new codebase at the bottom of the "new school" graphs to show that even in our most complicated source, we're never writing 1000+-line functions that nest functional blocks 10 or 15 levels deep.
Interesting structures to look for: any long stretches where the graph line doesn't return to the baseline (denoting a function or a functional block that continues without break); and visual structures that "look" the same (have the same profile)... the "old school" programmer(s) tended towards *rampant* code "reuse" (and by reuse I mean copy/paste), so you'll tend to see very similar-looking structures in a lot of the graphs on the left-hand side.
Just an aside: pay little mind to this exposition, as I was just mucking around with Google Charts and the idea of putting together some type of alternative code metric. For an few hours work, I think it came out pretty well.
Check Picasa for super-full-sized version.
Update 02/01/08: Original version of the script had a bug that accounts for some of the "reticulating" spikes seen... will try to post a new version of this image generated with the new script "soon".
Speaking of the script, here is the source (with the aforementioned bug and a few others fixed). Like I said, it was whipped up in a few hours, so it's not the prettiest nor the most well-written, but it works!
Update 02/04/08: uploaded newest version of the script (rev 1778), which changes the default behavior to count indentation level by looking at brackets, rather than simply the amount of indentation per line. Makes for much smoother charts; will hopefully re-post this image after running through the new script soon!
3264
2448
pixel
-1381969974
288
16
210
0.587
0.194
normalized
0.684
0.258
Face
-1381969974
311
17
180
0.760
0.172
normalized
0.895
0.229
Face
-1381969974
18
264
45
180
0.410
0.178
normalized
0.311
0.237
Face
New Project I'm starting to normalize conversations about homelessness and how each of us can do our part to help.
All the shots are unique, you haven't seen them earlier and were not processed from published ones!
These shots were made with Pentax KF B&W Orange settings. Not IR as for shots with black sky to add a pinch of doom scenario or apocalyptic emotions. Time to find out what's good in traditional b&w shots. Both other series and this one were accompanied with CPF.
What I did was normalizing central gray scope here to make the shots look similar. I'm aiming to discover camera sets to make shots without need to post process them, if that would be possible, or with minimalist touches of my GIMP.
I did not touched black slider. Gray (+/-), white (-) and highlight (-) sliders only, plus conservative values for sharpness (only for compensation of camera soft settings): Radius: 1.000, Amount: 0.310 and Threshold: 0.110.
I ask you for comments what to check, what to correct and how,
and which compositions look better using such bright settings for shooting b&w with strong day light. Any suggestions are welcome and highly appreciated.
Thank you. :) Have a nice fun here. :)
May 3, 2016: Over the last six months, risks to global financial stability have risen, according to the International Monetary Fund’s April 2016 Global Financial Stability Report. In advanced economies, the outlook has deteriorated because of heightened uncertainty and setbacks to growth and confidence. Disruptions to global asset markets have added to these pressures. Declines in oil and commodity prices have kept risks elevated in emerging markets, while greater uncertainty about China’s growth transition has increased spillovers to global markets. These developments tightened financial conditions, reduced risk appetite, and raised credit risks, weighing on financial stability. The situation in markets appears significantly improved, but is the turmoil of the past months now safely behind us, or is it a warning signal that more needs to be done to secure financial stability? The IMF’s April 2016 GFSR addresses this key question and many others.
This was for my AP concentration. I wanted tot normalize cannibalism and anthropophagy by focusing on the emotions and reasons instead of the act itself. This picture was to represent for the cultural/tribal side of the act.