View allAll Photos Tagged Movements
A couple of movements in at Bankstown whilst waiting for the Quest...
AirMed VH-IGK Piper PA-31-350 coming back from a flight.
VH-NJT AERO COMMANDER 685 that went out for an engine run.
₢ Renão | 2017
rain'tiempo.\ph
piXeliZ.e
Facebook: www.facebook.com/renaodigital
Instagram: instagram.com/renaodigital
Twitter: twitter.com/renaodigital
This is a detail image from one of my Fluid Paintings using Acrylic paints. You can see all of my paintings in full on my website at www.markchadwick.co.uk. Thanks for viewing!
This juvenile Red-necked Grebe is molting into an adult as evidenced by the increase of the red in the neck but it still has what I refer to as "prison plumage", that black and white striped appearance on its head. It was going through a series of movements similar to a duck flapping its wings but different, a movement that involves the neck more along with a sort of lunging forward with a head and neck twisting movement. It makes me wonder if molting is a bit of an irritant and this is it's way of "scratching" that itch, so to speak. Anyway, it was fascinating observing this behavior which went on for a bit while I was there that day.
Taken 14 August 2017 at Westchester Lagoon, Anchorage, Alaska.
50018 Resolution and another class member await their next turn of duty around the turntable at Old Oak Common in July 1988
Despite signs to the contrary at the entrance Old Oak was always a friendly shed to visit.
Logs, speedboats, trains, and traffic all make their way to their destination on or near the Fraser River.
Thought I would post a sign (for Daves amusement)
The Movements Supervisor - Sounds like a sh1t job to me...
Training occurs prior to any big event. Proof of concept, being match fit, learning roles, refinement, gestures, movements and timings. Being in a team or performing as an individual.
In this image we see an illustration of an earthwork currently known as a Neolithic 'cursus' and here renamed a 'Transport Dragon Run': here a training ground - in two days, a gathering.
This form of early British Isles Neolithic earthwork sags over time; fails ever to be restored back into vivid form and space, and even gets ploughed back into soil or aligned aside traffic jams, electric windows and passing snaps.
Here the 'Transport Dragon Run' has a long barrow at one end, and a terminal post hole, and so is mildly inspired by the 3km long 'Stonehenge Greater cursus' of around 3500 BC. This earthwork came into time during the lifespan of the nearby 'Pedestal circle' at 'Robin Hood Ball' (4000-3000 BC) and originated some 400 years prior to another nearby earthwork, that of the pre megalithic Stonehenge 1 (3100 BC): a causewayed henge, almost like a simplified memory of a pedestal circle, where display took over from capacity for individual 'Transport Dragons' to execute outwards tangential rush.
[See linked below for an associated Flickr post and drawing that illustrates the early Neolithic 'Causewayed Enclosure' earthworks as 'Pedestal circles' for grouped 'Transport Dragons'. See past posts and a Flickr album for a full explanation of the 'Transport Dragon' and how it was enhanced and enabled by the invention of the 'Tension lever' - currently known as the 'Bâton percé' - again, research and Flickr album via this Photostream]
The dates of the Neolithic vary from east to west and south to north, as do details of regional megalithic, petroglyphic and earthwork manifestation. In the UK, the landscape-art of ditch, bank and raised stone perhaps started with the 'Pedestal Circles': earthworks for groups of late period residual 'Transport Dragons'. The 100 examples of 'Pedestal Circles' were built between 4900 and 4800 BC. Stonehenge 1 had many of the qualities of a causewayed enclosure and this ripple for a true future megasite was thrown around 3100 BC, so 1700 years after the 'Pedestal circle' building boom. In-between are found the hyperbolic and intoxicatingly unusual earthworks currently known as 'cursus' and here referred to as 'Transport Dragon Runs'.
In summary: the following chronology relates to parts of Britain:
- 'Pedestal circles' (Causewayed enclosures) 3700-3625 BC
- Approximative 100 year buffer
- 'Transport dragon runs' (Cursus) approx' 3500-2920 BC
- The 'Stonehenge 1' earthwork 3100 BC
- Approximative 100 year buffer
- Start of the age of megalithic stone circles: around 3000 BC.
Earthwork mounds (barrows/Tumuli) of varied silhouette and armature tended to start after the Pedestal circles and then coincide with the 'Transport Dragon Runs' to then carry on for several ages.
Examples of 'Transport Dragon Runs' include the 10km long Dorset Cursus; the triple henged megasite with dissecting cursus of 'Thornborough', and of course the examples on sites that would later be remembered as 'Newgrange' and 'Stonehenge'. From just 46m long to a staggering 9.7km, there was something in the function of a 'Cursus' that accepted flexibility of local expression. Some examples crossed rivers, many occurred near rivers. Which ever size you choose, the builders of the peripheral banks (via exterior ditch) would need to find a serious and compelling 'self' motivation, or they might need to be bullied and threatened into work by physical and/or psychological strategy. This latter option seems to be snug with the zeitgeist of today's video-game generation, and several prehistory commentators describing 'religious dictators', late prehistoric 'Lords' and other examples of back-dated Medievalism and Empire-ista. In effect, we are currently asked to imagine images of 'overlords' wanting parade grounds - the current Wiki.
There are upwards of 200 known examples of this hard won and early landscape earthwork. The early to mid Neolithic enjoyed still enjoyed forests and scrub interstitial. Parades are very human and not a jarring concept, but post Mesolithic clans might easily doubt a would-be leader's judgement regarding excessive bank and ditch circumferences. Individuals could simply disappear into the quiet and croft. I think that it is also easy to see that parades do not need 9.7km earthwork lines to be majestic or compelling, but do need more than 46m; and that parades that pass over rivers would arrive as 'pétards mouillés' more than respectable heroes or dynamic energies from within Mother Nature's array of lifeforces.
I propose the "Transport Dragon Run' as an alternative explanation to 'Cursus', and those who have read my explanation of the 'Pedestal circle' (Causewayed enclosure) will no doubt already see how the two can be linked and phase-change from circle into elongated oblong.
In the text for the associated post on the anterior earthworks of 'Pedestal circles' (Causewayed Enclosures), I offer arguments that the circles were pedestals for 'Transport Dragons'. Each pedestal had it's own exit (causeway) accessed exclusively by each gathered Transport Dragon. Transport Dragons can surge forwards with ease, perhaps reverse with difficulty (people inside walking backwards or turning whilst holding the interior frame structure) and shuffle sideways with a clumsy fall. From these early circular earthworks, gathered residual Transport Dragons could meet to trade, and mix with newcomers and sedentary crofters who had lost their implicit association with a mythological clan frame. The ability for each Transport Dragon to rush down and tangentially out of a causeway, gave the Pedestal rings a military capacity which could be applied to assure a traditional use and respect for the animate landscape (free riverside passage and so on). Now, if circles were the traditional way for clans of Transport Dragons to meet, then there were downsides that might appear over time. Pedestal circles were static, and the new sedentary populations may not witness the power potential of the form. Likewise, some Transport Dragons may slow down to a point that they loose their vitality, and the emergent properties of several strong legs powering a weighted ornamental and mythological frame might suffer from fitness issues (varied rupestra and ceramic sculptures from the Neolithic can be seen to depict overweight individuals). Here, the Cursus/Transport Dragon Run was in effect an extended Pedestal Circle, with the new interior space perfect for training and displays of acumen, stealth, resilience and sheer power.
As the landscape slowed and the cadence of long journeys reduced down, some Transport Dragons localised to help with earthworks, post glacial monolith moving, clapper bridge adjustment and earth and tree moving around rivers. Being guardians of a 'Transport Dragon Run' enabled these residual clans to retain their local meaning and the idiosyncratic belief systems of each mythical frame from specific deep human prehistories. This desire to remain alive with past and future ideas and beliefs and holistically vital for practical culture would in my mind be enough to motivate this subset of the population to stay strong and dig and build without being threatened or conned.
The above image shows a Transport Dragon Run many years into its period of use. It has lived and it has grown with nature. Three transport Dragons can be seen towards the end of a practise run. For most of the run the fire has been guarded in the sculptured cob jaws as embers of potential energy. On the final 'New Year's' day, they will need to cross the line with the embers turned into a blaze of fire - and here they are practising.
Trade can now be from each end, as can other episodes of people and place. Some Transport Dragon runs are known for endurance (9.7km), some examples for pomp and none lineal runs (Thornborough), and some examples for sprints (46m); some are known for cross-country obstacle, and some also aligned into the spirit of the sun, the moon and the stars. On big days, there were parades along all or a portion of the run. Some Transport Dragons were never raced but simply appeared on banks to interact. Some teams practised on basic frames (illustrated above) which saved the ornamental and meaningful examples for big occasions. Some Transport Dragons stayed local to a dragon run, others dedicated schedules to travel between regional examples. Many locals 'supported' a Transport Dragon without having lived and earned its Mythology. A sense of greater space than a single Neolithic life could know. Of the Transport Dragons that fixed to a place, local services against bandits were offered. This premegalithic Britain was a strong population and landscape role model on display to the watching: for this illustration, 'Saltimbanques', 'Princesses' waiting to be carried, children with outlandish high hats and tasselled sticks, and rowdy early arrivals for the future crowd. To the far side, a group practise a whirling dance around a camp fire, and in the far distance more Transport Dragons are looked at and crafted prior to a breath-taking run of extraordinary technique.
Happy Christmas and a Happy New Year to Flickr and its diverse community. Looking forward...
AJM 29.12.21
Amedeo Modigliani
Italian, 1884 - 1920
Woman with a Necklace, 1917
Oil on canvas
(closeup)
Amedeo Clemente Modigliani (July 12, 1884 – January 24, 1920) was a Jewish-Italian painter and sculptor who pursued his career for the most part in France. Modigliani was born in Livorno, Italy and began his artistic studies in Italy before moving to Paris in 1906. Influenced by the artists in his circle of friends and associates, by a range of genres and movements, and by primitive art, Modigliani's oeuvre was nonetheless unique and idiosyncratic. He died in Paris of tubercular meningitis—exacerbated by a lifestyle of excess—at the age of 35.
Early life
Modigliani was born into a Jewish family in Livorno, Italy.
Livorno was still a relatively new city, by Italian standards, in the late nineteenth century. The city on the Tyrrhenian coast dates from around 1600, when it was transformed from a swampy village into a seaport. The Livorno that Modigliani knew was a bustling centre of commerce focused upon seafaring and shipwrighting, but its cultural history lay in being a refuge for those persecuted for their religion. His own maternal great-great-grandfather was one Solomon Garsin, a Jew who had immigrated to Livorno in the eighteenth century as a religious refugee.
Modigliani was the fourth child of Flaminio Modigliani and his wife, Eugenia Garsin. His father was in the money-changing business, but when the business went bankrupt, the family lived in dire poverty. In fact, Amedeo's birth saved the family from certain ruin, as, according to an ancient law, creditors could not seize the bed of a pregnant woman or a mother with a newborn child. When bailiffs entered the family home, just as Eugenia went into labour, the family protected their most valuable assets by piling them on top of the expectant mother.
Modigliani had a particularly close relationship with his mother, who taught her son at home until he was ten. Beset with health problems after a bout of typhoid at the age of fourteen, two years later he contracted the tuberculosis which would affect him for the rest of his life. To help him recover from his many childhood illnesses, she took him to Naples in Southern Italy, where the warmer weather was conducive to his convalescence.
His mother was, in many ways, instrumental in his ability to pursue art as a vocation. When he was eleven years of age, she had noted in her diary that:
“The child's character is still so unformed that I cannot say what I think of it. He behaves like a spoiled child, but he does not lack intelligence. We shall have to wait and see what is inside this chrysalis. Perhaps an artist?"
Art student years
Modigliani is known to have drawn and painted from a very early age, and thought himself "already a painter", his mother wrote, even before beginning formal studies. Despite her misgivings that launching him on a course of studying art would impinge upon his other studies, his mother indulged the young Modigliani's passion for the subject.
At the age of fourteen, while sick with the typhoid fever, he raved in his delirium that he wanted, above all else, to see the paintings in the Palazzo Pitti and the Uffizi in Florence. As Livorno's local museum only housed a sparse few paintings by the Italian Renaissance masters, the tales he had heard about the great works held in Florence intrigued him, and it was a source of considerable despair to him, in his sickened state, that he might never get the chance to view them in person. His mother promised that she would take him to Florence herself, the moment he was recovered. Not only did she fulfil this promise, but she also undertook to enroll him with the best painting master in Livorno, Guglielmo Micheli.
Micheli and the Macchiaioli
Modigliani worked in the studio of Micheli from 1898 to 1900. Here his earliest formal artistic instruction took place in an atmosphere deeply steeped in a study of the styles and themes of nineteenth-century Italian art. In his earliest Parisian work, traces of this influence, and that of his studies of Renaissance art, can still be seen: artists such as Giovanni Boldini figure just as much in this nascent work as do those of Toulouse-Lautrec.
Modigliani showed great promise while with Micheli, and only ceased his studies when he was forced to, by the onset of tuberculosis.
In 1901, whilst in Rome, Modigliani admired the work of Domenico Morelli, a painter of melodramatic Biblical studies and scenes from great literature. It is ironic that he should be so struck by Morelli, as this painter had served as an inspiration for a group of iconoclasts who went by the title, the Macchiaioli (from macchia—"dash of colour", or, more derogatively, "stain"), and Modigliani had already been exposed to the influences of the Macchiaioli. This minor, localised art movement was possessed of a need to react against the bourgeois stylings of the academic genre painters. While sympathetically connected to (and actually pre-dating) the French Impressionists, the Macchiaioli did not make the same impact upon international art culture as did the followers of Monet, and are today largely forgotten outside of Italy.
Modigliani's connection with the movement was through Micheli, his first art teacher. Micheli was not only a Macchiaioli himself, but had been a pupil of the famous Giovanni Fattori, a founder of the movement. Micheli's work, however, was so fashionable and the genre so commonplace that the young Modigliani reacted against it, preferring to ignore the obsession with landscape that, as with French Impressionism, characterised the movement. Micheli also tried to encourage his pupils to paint en plein air, but Modigliani never really got a taste for this style of working, sketching in cafes, but preferring to paint indoors, and especially in his own studio. Even when compelled to paint landscapes (three are known to exist), Modigliani chose a proto-Cubist palette more akin to Cézanne than to the Macchiaioli.
While with Micheli, Modigliani not only studied landscape, but also portraiture, still-life, and the nude. His fellow students recall that the latter was where he displayed his greatest talent, and apparently this was not an entirely academic pursuit for the teenager: when not painting nudes, he was occupied with seducing the household maid.
Despite his rejection of the Macchiaioli approach, Modigliani nonetheless found favour with his teacher, who referred to him as "Superman", a pet name reflecting the fact that Modigliani was not only quite adept at his art, but also that he regularly quoted from Nietzsche's Thus Spake Zarathustra. Fattori himself would often visit the studio, and approved of the young artist's innovations.
In 1902, Modigliani continued what was to be a life-long infatuation with life drawing, enrolling in the Accademia di Belle Arti (Scuola Libera di Nudo, or "Free School of Nude Studies") in Florence. A year later while still suffering from tuberculosis, he moved to Venice, where he registered to study at the Istituto di Belle Arti.
It is in Venice that he first smoked hashish and, rather than studying, began to spend time frequenting disreputable parts of the city. The impact of these lifestyle choices upon his developing artistic style is open to conjecture, although these choices do seem to be more than simple teenage rebellion, or the cliched hedonism and bohemianism that was almost expected of artists of the time; his pursuit of the seedier side of life appears to have roots in his appreciation of radical philosophies, such as those of Nietzsche.
Early literary influences
Having been exposed to erudite philosophical literature as a young boy under the tutelage of Isaco Garsin, his maternal grandfather, he continued to read and be influenced through his art studies by the writings of Nietzsche, Baudelaire, Carduzzi, Comte de Lautréamont, and others, and developed the belief that the only route to true creativity was through defiance and disorder.
Letters that he wrote from his 'sabbatical' in Capri in 1901 clearly indicate that he is being more and more influenced by the thinking of Nietzsche. In these letters, he advised friend Oscar Ghiglia,
“(hold sacred all) which can exalt and excite your intelligence... (and) ... seek to provoke ... and to perpetuate ... these fertile stimuli, because they can push the intelligence to its maximum creative power.”
The work of Lautréamont was equally influential at this time. This doomed poet's Les Chants de Maldoror became the seminal work for the Parisian Surrealists of Modigliani's generation, and the book became Modigliani's favourite to the extent that he learnt it by heart. The poetry of Lautréamont is characterised by the juxtaposition of fantastical elements, and by sadistic imagery; the fact that Modigliani was so taken by this text in his early teens gives a good indication of his developing tastes. Baudelaire and D'Annunzio similarly appealed to the young artist, with their interest in corrupted beauty, and the expression of that insight through Symbolist imagery.
Modigliani wrote to Ghiglia extensively from Capri, where his mother had taken him to assist in his recovery from the tuberculosis. These letters are a sounding board for the developing ideas brewing in Modigliani's mind. Ghiglia was seven years Modigliani's senior, and it is likely that it was he who showed the young man the limits of his horizons in Livorno. Like all precocious teenagers, Modigliani preferred the company of older companions, and Ghiglia's role in his adolescence was to be a sympathetic ear as he worked himself out, principally in the convoluted letters that he regularly sent, and which survive today.
“Dear friend
I write to pour myself out to you and to affirm myself to myself. I am the prey of great powers that surge forth and then disintegrate... A bourgeois told me today - insulted me - that I or at least my brain was lazy. It did me good. I should like such a warning every morning upon awakening: but they cannot understand us nor can they understand life...”
Paris
Arrival
In 1906 Modigliani moved to Paris, then the focal point of the avant-garde. In fact, his arrival at the epicentre of artistic experimentation coincided with the arrival of two other foreigners who were also to leave their marks upon the art world: Gino Severini and Juan Gris.
He settled in Le Bateau-Lavoir, a commune for penniless artists in Montmartre, renting himself a studio in Rue Caulaincourt. Even though this artists' quarter of Montmartre was characterised by generalised poverty, Modigliani himself presented - initially, at least - as one would expect the son of a family trying to maintain the appearances of its lost financial standing to present: his wardrobe was dapper without ostentation, and the studio he rented was appointed in a style appropriate to someone with a finely attuned taste in plush drapery and Renaissance reproductions. He soon made efforts to assume the guise of the bohemian artist, but, even in his brown corduroys, scarlet scarf and large black hat, he continued to appear as if he were slumming it, having fallen upon harder times.
When he first arrived in Paris, he wrote home regularly to his mother, he sketched his nudes at the Colarossi school, and he drank wine in moderation. He was at that time considered by those who knew him as a bit reserved, verging on the asocial. He is noted to have commented, upon meeting Picasso who, at the time, was wearing his trademark workmen's clothes, that even though the man was a genius, that did not excuse his uncouth appearance.
Transformation
Within a year of arriving in Paris, however, his demeanour and reputation had changed dramatically. He transformed himself from a dapper academician artist into a sort of prince of vagabonds.
The poet and journalist Louis Latourette, upon visiting the artist's previously well-appointed studio after his transformation, discovered the place in upheaval, the Renaissance reproductions discarded from the walls, the plush drapes in disarray. Modigliani was already an alcoholic and a drug addict by this time, and his studio reflected this. Modigliani's behaviour at this time sheds some light upon his developing style as an artist, in that the studio had become almost a sacrificial effigy for all that he resented about the academic art that had marked his life and his training up to that point.
Not only did he remove all the trappings of his bourgeois heritage from his studio, but he also set about destroying practically all of his own early work. He explained this extraordinary course of actions to his astonished neighbours thus:
“Childish baubles, done when I was a dirty bourgeois."
The motivation for this violent rejection of his earlier self is the subject of considerable speculation. The self-destructive tendencies may have stemmed from his tuberculosis and the knowledge (or presumption) that the disease had essentially marked him for an early death; within the artists' quarter, many faced the same sentence, and the typical response was to set about enjoying life while it lasted, principally by indulging in self-destructive actions. For Modigliani such behavior may have been a response to a lack of recognition; it is known that he sought the company of other alcoholic artists such as Utrillo and Soutine, seeking acceptance and validation for his work from his colleagues.
Modigliani's behavior stood out even in these Bohemian surroundings: he carried on frequent affairs, drank heavily, and used absinthe and hashish. While drunk he would sometimes strip himself naked at social gatherings. He became the epitome of the tragic artist, creating a posthumous legend almost as well-known as that of Vincent van Gogh.
During the 1920s, in the wake of Modigliani's career and spurred on by comments by Andre Salmon crediting hashish and absinthe with the genesis of Modigliani's style, many hopefuls tried to emulate his 'success' by embarking on a path of substance abuse and bohemian excess. Salmon claimed—erroneously—that whereas Modigliani was a totally pedestrian artist when sober,
“...from the day that he abandoned himself to certain forms of debauchery, an unexpected light came upon him, transforming his art. From that day on, he became one who must be counted among the masters of living art.”
While this propaganda served as a rallying cry to those with a romantic longing to be a tragic, doomed artist, these strategies did not produce unique artistic insights or techniques in those who did not already have them.
In fact, art historians suggest that it is entirely possible for Modigliani to have achieved even greater artistic heights had he not been immured in, and destroyed by, his own self-indulgences. We can only speculate what he might have accomplished had he emerged intact from his self-destructive explorations.
Output
During his early years in Paris, Modigliani worked at a furious pace. He was constantly sketching, making as many as a hundred drawings a day. However, many of his works were lost - destroyed by him as inferior, left behind in his frequent changes of address, or given to girlfriends who did not keep them.
He was first influenced by Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec, but around 1907 he became fascinated with the work of Paul Cézanne. Eventually he developed his own unique style, one that cannot be adequately categorized with other artists.
He met the first serious love of his life, Russian poet Anna Akhmatova, in 1910, when he was 26. They had studios in the same building, and although 21-year-old Anna was recently married, they began an affair. Tall (Modigliani was only 5 foot 5 inches) with dark hair (like Modigliani's), pale skin and grey-green eyes, she embodied Modigliani's aesthetic ideal and the pair became engrossed in each other. After a year, however, Anna returned to her husband.
Experiments with sculpture
In 1909, Modigliani returned home to Livorno, sickly and tired from his wild lifestyle. Soon he was back in Paris, this time renting a studio in Montparnasse. He originally saw himself as a sculptor rather than a painter, and was encouraged to continue after Paul Guillaume, an ambitious young art dealer, took an interest in his work and introduced him to sculptor Constantin Brancusi.
Although a series of Modigliani's sculptures were exhibited in the Salon d'Automne of 1912, he abruptly abandoned sculpting and focused solely on his painting.
Question of influences
In Modigliani's art, there is evidence of the influence of primitive art from Africa and Cambodia which he may have seen in the Musée de l'Homme, but his stylisations are just as likely to have been the result of his being surrounded by Mediaeval sculpture during his studies in Northern Italy (there is no recorded information from Modigliani himself, as there is with Picasso and others, to confirm the contention that he was influenced by either ethnic or any other kind of sculpture). A possible interest in African tribal masks seems to be evident in his portraits. In both his painting and sculpture, the sitters' faces resemble ancient Egyptian painting in their flat and masklike appearance, with distinctive almond eyes, pursed mouths, twisted noses, and elongated necks. However these same chacteristics are shared by Medieval European sculpture and painting.
Modigliani painted a series of portraits of contemporary artists and friends in Montparnasse: Chaim Soutine, Moise Kisling, Pablo Picasso, Diego Rivera, Marie "Marevna" Vorobyev-Stebeslka, Juan Gris, Max Jacob, Blaise Cendrars, and Jean Cocteau, all sat for stylized renditions.
At the outset of World War I, Modigliani tried to enlist in the army but was refused because of his poor health.
The war years
Known as Modì, which roughly translates as 'morbid' or 'moribund', by many Parisians, but as Dedo to his family and friends, Modigliani was a handsome man, and attracted much female attention.
Women came and went until Beatrice Hastings entered his life. She stayed with him for almost two years, was the subject for several of his portraits, including Madame Pompadour, and the object of much of his drunken wrath.
When the British painter Nina Hamnett arrived in Montparnasse in 1914, on her first evening there the smiling man at the next table in the café introduced himself as Modigliani; painter and Jew. They became great friends.
In 1916, Modigliani befriended the Polish poet and art dealer Leopold Zborovski and his wife Anna.
Jeanne Hébuterne
The following summer, the Russian sculptor Chana Orloff introduced him to a beautiful 19-year-old art student named Jeanne Hébuterne who had posed for Foujita. From a conservative bourgeois background, Hébuterne was renounced by her devout Roman Catholic family for her liaison with the painter, whom they saw as little more than a debauched derelict, and, worse yet, a Jew. Despite her family's objections, soon they were living together, and although Hébuterne was the love of his life, their public scenes became more renowned than Modigliani's individual drunken exhibitions.
On December 3, 1917, Modigliani's first one-man exhibition opened at the Berthe Weill Gallery. The chief of the Paris police was scandalized by Modigliani's nudes and forced him to close the exhibition within a few hours after its opening.
After he and Hébuterne moved to Nice, she became pregnant and on November 29, 1918 gave birth to a daughter whom they named Jeanne (1918-1984).
Nice
During a trip to Nice, conceived and organized by Leopold Zborovski, Modigliani, Tsuguharu Foujita and other artists tried to sell their works to rich tourists. Modigliani managed to sell a few pictures but only for a few francs each. Despite this, during this time he produced most of the paintings that later became his most popular and valued works.
During his lifetime he sold a number of his works, but never for any great amount of money. What funds he did receive soon vanished for his habits.
In May of 1919 he returned to Paris, where, with Hébuterne and their daughter, he rented an apartment in the rue de la Grande Chaumière. While there, both Jeanne Hébuterne and Amedeo Modigliani painted portraits of each other, and of themselves.
Last days
Although he continued to paint, Modigliani's health was deteriorating rapidly, and his alcohol-induced blackouts became more frequent.
In 1920, after not hearing from him for several days, his downstairs neighbor checked on the family and found Modigliani in bed delirious and holding onto Hébuterne who was nearly nine months pregnant. They summoned a doctor, but little could be done because Modigliani was dying of the then-incurable disease tubercular meningitis.
Modigliani died on January 24, 1920. There was an enormous funeral, attended by many from the artistic communities in Montmartre and Montparnasse.
Hébuterne was taken to her parents' home, where, inconsolable, she threw herself out of a fifth-floor window two days after Modigliani's death, killing herself and her unborn child. Modigliani was interred in Père Lachaise Cemetery. Hébuterne was buried at the Cimetière de Bagneux near Paris, and it was not until 1930 that her embittered family allowed her body to be moved to rest beside Modigliani.
Modigliani died penniless and destitute—managing only one solo exhibition in his life and giving his work away in exchange for meals in restaurants. Had he lived through the 1920s when American buyers flooded Paris, his fortunes might well have changed. Since his death his reputation has soared. Nine novels, a play, a documentary and three feature films have been devoted to his life.
"Every child is an artist. The problem is how to remain an artist once we grow up." Pablo Picasso
This impression is captured through camera not post- processing!!!
It was my second time come to Marshall's beach to do the sunset colors study with the Golden Gate Bridge. I got wet by the water blast to my lens and filters but it worth for this shot. However, I think the shutter speed was bit too long for the sea water movements. What do you think? Any input will be greatly appreciate it. Thanks of you visiting my website!
I visited this spot in 2013 & 2014, and since departing it for 4 odd years a piano has very oddly appeared in a now very sealed building, I mean who carries a very heavy piano INTO a derelict building.
For a change I shot this with my Helios 44m - 58mm vintage lens attached to the front of my Canon 5dsr - I loved the tones it produces.
My new (and first ever) 2019 Calendar is now available to pre-order and you can do so here:
Capturing these layered movements of this Bulova Swiss watch took thirty-two focus stacked images. Though scratched some and dinged a little bit, the brushed metal details and anodized metallic colors are still shiny.
As a westbound manifest rolls along track #1 of the UP Geneva Sub, Global III RCO SD40-2s work along Global III 7,200 ft West lead track #2 making up an outbound.
Large logo Class 47 No.47451 pulls away from Marylebone after bringing the ecs in for a Shakespeare Express working..
In the background Southern N15 “King Arthur” class No.30777 ' Sir Lamiel moves off the depot with a former Class 25 ETHEL unit in readiness to back down to the station to head The Shakespeare Express steam special to Stratford on Avon
Another archive shot from the 1980s when regular steam runs took place between Marylebone and Stratford on Avon
P11 GVM parked alongside The Mall. Paul Grimshaw Vehicle Movements specialist car transporter on the day of the St James's Motoring Spectacle 2024 being held in Pall Mall.
Leica IIIf @ 1/100
VL Heliar 40mm 1:2.8 @ f=11
Filter B+W 34 022 2x MRC
FOMAPAN 100 @ 100 ASA
ORWO R09 1+25H2O @ 20°C
4'30"' @ AGFA shake (30'' permanent + 3 Movements each '30")
Scan by PenF + 30/3,5 Macro
Despite the gloomy skies, decided to bring my camera along with me for dinner. Ending dinner just in time for "sunset" (it was completely not visible that evening), I decided to try my luck snapping stuff other than the sunset.
A repost of an image dear to my heart. It was published by Lonely Planet in their "Best of Travel Photography 2008." After the sun set that night, we got terribly lost in this rather remote location!
A curious creation on College Green in central Bristol. Called "Cityscape" it claims to record the movements of people who walk though this group of wooden posts and show this to those who follow. I think it only really works in the dark though.
A very common sight around rural eastern Australia at the moment with the long-running drought and the lack of stock feed in the badly hit areas, hopefully the rain over the last week might be a change of luck.
(1/2) International prime mover (Deborah) from Aves Haulage out of Ivanhoe. Moving through Balranald in the early cold & wet light.
(2/2) Unmarked Western Star heading in to Wagga in the late afternoon, still cold!
Riverina, New South Wales, Australia