View allAll Photos Tagged Election!
Some snaps from stopping by a few of our schools in Des Moines that are serving as polling locations in the 2022 election.
Today Prime Minister Mark Carney asked Governor-General Mary Simon to dissolve Parliament. As a result, Canada is now in a general election. An election had to be called sometime before October 20 of this year. Carney chose sooner than later.
For Canada, this is an existential election, centring partly on the ridiculous tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump, but even more, this is an organic movement against Trump's continued threats to annex our country. To try to take over Canada would be a very large mistake. Clearly Trump doesn't know one of the main reasons the Geneva Convention was written. He would be advised to look it up.
The election called today takes place in 38 days on April 28. This is only one day longer than the minimum election campaign time allowed. Most Canadian general election campaigns run between 5-7 weeks in length. At the dissolution of Parliament, there were 338 seats in the House of Commons. For this election, because of population shifts, there will be elections for 343 seats.
Above me in the picture are the leaders of the six main national political parties, all running for election and the right to be Prime Minister. I have arranged the pictures according to their position on the political spectrum as I see it, from left to right.
At left is Jagmeet Singh of the New Democratic Party; Prime Minister Mark Carney of the Liberal Party; Elizabeth May of the Green Party; Yves-François Blanchet of the Bloc Québécois; Pierre Poilievre of the Conservative Party; and Maxime Bernier of the People's Party.
There are also numerous smaller, more regional parties with more limited slates that rarely get any candidates elected.
For those that believe, think or even hope that Canada will become the 51st state of the United States (ludicrous as that sounds simply because Canada is the second largest country in the world), be advised that authoritarians do not take over other countries to broaden their voter base. They take over other countries to exploit their resources and use the population as cheap, often slave, labour. And if you doubt that, see the history of Germany 1938-45 after their "liberations" of other countries began.
Vancouver, Oct. 27, 2015 - In the wake of the Oct. 19 federal election, this Canadian Journalism Foundation J-Talk explored the strategies and issues that had the most impact in this tight and historic long-running election race. Photos: Jonathan Desmond Photography
Today is election day and the campaigns are finally over. To all my US friends, I hope you have already voted or are going to vote before the polls close. And regardless of who you vote for I hope you base your choice on a well-reasoned analysis of the candidates and their positions. I voted in person during early voting last week, but my wife and daughter voted by mail to avoid exposure to crowds. I got two stickers - one for voting in the national election and one for the local and state-wide races. Now we just have to await the results.
Enthusiastic crowds gathered last week for an election rally for the opposition Kulmiye Party in Burao, Somaliland. The presidential election is set for Saturday. More Photos »
By JEFFREY GETTLEMAN
Published: June 25, 2010
BURAO, Somalia — The rallies usually start early in the morning, before the sunshine hurts.
By 8 a.m. on a recent day, thousands of people were packed into Burao’s sandy town square, with little boys climbing high into the trees to get a peek at the politicians.
“We’re going to end corruption!” one of the politicians boomed, holding several microphones at once. “We’re going to bring dignity back to the people!”
The boys cheered wildly. Wispy militiamen punched bony fists in the air. The politicians’ messages were hardly original. But in this corner of Africa, a free and open political rally — led, no less, by opposition leaders who could actually win — is an anomaly apparently worthy of celebration.
The crowd that day helped tell a strange truth: that one of the most democratic countries in the Horn of Africa is not really a country at all. It is Somaliland, the northwestern corner of Somalia, which, since the disintegration of the Somali state in 1991, has been on a quixotic mission for recognition as its own separate nation.
While so much of Somalia is plagued by relentless violence, this little-known piece of the Somali puzzle is peaceful and organized enough to hold national elections this week, with more than one million registered voters. The campaigns are passionate but fair, say the few Western observers here. The roads are full of battered old Toyotas blasting out slogans from staticky megaphones lashed to the roofs.
Somalilanders have pulled off peaceful national elections three times. The last presidential election in 2003 was decided by a wafer-thin margin, around 80 votes at the time of counting, yet there was no violence. Each successful election feeds the hope here that one day the world will reward Somaliland with recognition for carving a functioning, democratic space out of one of the most chaotic countries in the world.
But this presidential election, scheduled for Saturday, will be one of the biggest tests yet for Somaliland’s budding democracy.
The government seems unpopular, partly because Somaliland is still desperately poor, a place where even in the biggest towns, like Burao or the capital, Hargeisa, countless people dwell in bubble-shaped huts made out of cardboard scraps and flattened oil drums. Most independent observers predict the leading opposition party, Kulmiye, which means something akin to “the one who brings people together,” will get the most votes.
But that does not mean the opposition will necessarily win.
In many cases in Africa — Ethiopia in 2005, Kenya in 2007, Zimbabwe in 2008 — right when the opposition appeared poised to win elections, the government seemed to fiddle with the results, forcibly holding on to power and sometimes provoking widespread unrest in the process.
“There’s probably not going to be many problems with the voting itself, but the day after,” said Roble Mohamed, the former editor in chief of one of Somaliland’s top Web sites. “That is the question.”
Many people here worry that if Somaliland’s governing party, UDUB, tries to hold on to power illegitimately, the well-armed populace (this is still part of Somalia, after all) will rise up and Somaliland’s nearly two decades of peace could disappear in a cloud of gun smoke.
“I know this happens in Africa, but it won’t happen in Somaliland,” promised Said Adani Moge, a spokesman for Somaliland’s government. “If we lose, we’ll give up power. The most important thing is peace.”
Easily said, infrequently done. Peaceful transfers of power are a rarity in this neighborhood. In April, Sudan held its first national elections in more than 20 years (the last change of power was a coup), but the voting was widely considered superficial because of widespread intimidation beforehand and the withdrawal of several leading opposition parties from the presidential race.
Last month’s vote in Ethiopia, in which the governing party and its allies won more than 99 percent of the parliamentary seats, was also tainted by what human rights groups called a campaign of government repression, including the manipulation of American food aid to starve out the opposition.
Then there is little Eritrea, along the Red Sea, which has not held a presidential election since the early 1990s, when it won independence. And Djibouti, home to a large American military base, where the president recently pushed to have the Constitution changed so he could run again.
South-central Somalia, where a very weak transitional government is struggling to fend off radical Islamist insurgents, is so dangerous that residents must risk insurgents’ wrath even to watch the World Cup, never mind holding a vote.
So in this volatile region, Somaliland has become a demonstration of the possible, sustaining a one-person one-vote democracy in a poor, conflict-torn place that gets very little help. While the government in south-central Somalia, which barely controls any territory, receives millions of dollars in direct support from the United Nations and the United States, the Somaliland government “doesn’t get a penny,” Mr. Said said.
Because Somaliland is not recognized as an independent country, it is very difficult for the government here to secure international loans, even though it has become a regional model for conflict resolution and democratic-institution building — buzzwords among Western donors.
In many respects, Somaliland is already its own country, with its own currency, its own army and navy, its own borders and its own national identity, as evidenced by the countless Somaliland T-shirts and flags everywhere you look. Part of this stems from its distinct colonial history, having been ruled, relatively indirectly, by the British, while the rest of Somalia was colonized by the Italians, who set up a European administration.
Italian colonization supplanted local elders, which might have been one reason that much of Somalia plunged into clan-driven chaos after 1991, while Somaliland succeeded in reconciling its clans.
Clan is not the prevailing issue in this election. The three presidential candidates (Somaliland’s election code says only three political parties can compete, and they take turns campaigning from day to day) are from different clans or subclans. Yet, many voters do not seem to care.
In the middle of miles and miles of thorn bush stand two huts about 100 feet apart, one with a green and yellow Kulmiye flag flapping from a stick flagpole, the other with a solid green UDUB flag.
Haboon Roble, a shy 20-year-old, explained that she liked UDUB: “They’re good. They hold up the house.”
But about 100 feet away, her uncle, Abdi Rahman Roble, shook his head. “This government hasn’t done anything for farmers,” he complained. “We can’t even get plastic sheets to catch the rain.”
He said he was voting for Kulmiye. “But I don’t tell anyone how to vote,” Mr. Abdi Rahman said. “That’s their choice.”
And like the other adults in the family, he proudly showed off his new plastic voter card, which he usually keeps hidden in a special place in his hut, along with other valuables.
supporters take a rest on the seashore in Nanao, Ilan, eastern Taiwan ,during an election campaign.
如果，可以這麼輕鬆愉快的選舉.....。
Mayor Bill de Blasio waits votes early in the presidential election at the Park Slope Armory YMCA on Tuesday, October 27, 2020. Michael Appleton/Mayoral Photography Office
Election literature sent to my house during the last weekend before the election.
This came in the mail on Saturday before the election. It's a flier asking "Is it worth the risk?" to elect Obama, given what Joe Biden said recently about expecting a crisis "to test the mettle of this guy".
The imagery includes pictures of Osama bin Laden, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Hugo Chavez, Kim Yong-Il, and Vladimir Putin. I'm frankly very surprised that Putin is included. What does that say about how the McCain campaign views Russia?
Thinking about it, I'm also pretty surprised that the people "watching" Obama are not named. Kim and Putin are pretty well known faces, but I bet a LOT of people would be unable to name them - not to mention Chavez and Ahmadinejad . And why not include the "iconic" Osama bin Laden picture, the one that everyone is likely to recognize instantly? Instead, his face is kind of hidden, especially considering that the coloring of the picture makes it fade into the background a lot. And why are Chavez and Kim in B/W but the other two are color? And would people really recognize right away that the background is a crucible? Or is that intentionally made to look like "the flames of hell"?
They are also reusing the "pensive Obama" shot from the "Crime & Punishment" flier. TBH, they needed a less thoughtful picture here. Making him look flippant (like the Biden pic), rather than thoughtful would have worked much better.
This is the least thought-through and least effective piece of the ones in this set, IMHO. I guess that makes sense, given that they must have rushed it out after the 19th.
Chairperson of the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC) Advocate Pansy Tlakula at the IEC Election Results Centre at the Pretoria Showground in Pretoria West. (Photo: GCIS)
When the light sabre batteries went flat, Darth and Obi Wan decided to settle the old Light vs Dark Side debate by popular vote.
Voters who come from work and those who waited for long queues to shorten queued outside polling stations before the elections time came to an end. (Photo: GCIS)
TEHRAN, June 14-- A man with a cane gestures towards a woman on the ground during protests in central Tehran. Defeated candidate Mirhossein Mousavi demanded Sunday that Iran's presidential election be annulled and urged more protests, while tens of thousands of people hailed the victory of the hardline Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
credits: REUTERS/Stringer
As "Game of Thrones'" cherubic assassin comes of age just in time for the general election, she talks sexual taboos and why generation selfie won’t be silenced. www.dazeddigital.com/artsandculture/article/24313/1/maisi...