View allAll Photos Tagged testing
Test of an inexpensive Neewer LED Macro Ring Flash FC100. The subject is about 3cm across and is a tricky one - shiny brass. At this distance the flash works well with a shutter speed of 1/160th, f8, ISO 200 but the flash lacks power. If I move away to a distance of half a metre I can't get a decent shot at ISO 200 even at f2.8, the flash isn't powerful enough. But for the money it's very good for real macro work.
Ok so first off I know this isn't a fair comparison but just in-case anyone cares this is the difference between a cheap consumer lens (on the right) and a pro grade lens (on the left)
Both pictures were taken at F5 1/60s iso 200 with a SB600 on camera bounced off ceiling set to 1/4
Between lens changing I had a piece of string on the ground to mark where he was standing and where I was shooting from.
So the test is pretty much as accurate as I could make it. Both pictures were shot Jpeg (which I NEVER shoot jpeg but wanted fair results) sooc
So the Image on the left is the:
Nikkor AF-S 24-70mm F2.8G FX
The image on the right is:
Nikkor AF-S 55-200mm VR F4-5.6G DX
The amount of detail in the eyelashes should be enough to demonstrate the difference. But for some reason the DX lens is under exposed.
All that said I know which lens I will always reach for!!!
Tested these brands and some more. Will need some time to round up the results...
Too many things too do, too little time.
Lees alvast: www.foodlog.nl/artikel/vissaus-de-grote-smaaktest/
Of toch gewoon over vissaus: www.aziatische-ingredienten.nl/vissaus/
Test Roll of Lomography CN 400 in my new Lomogrpahy Konstruktor DIY SLR.
Overall the pictures are okay. I don't think I'd be using it that often, the 1/80 shutter speed is just a bit too slow unless you stop and stand still.
Also it likes to eat film.
As I was out and about today, in Rainier Beach, I noticed a goose that was injured, it had a broken leg and as I talked on the phone to animal control about steps to get it to rehab, it flew across the street! So I drive across the street and searched the park for the limping injured goose, I could not find it, I asked everyone, including this awesome crew of very nice people! They did not see the goose, but promised that if they saw it, that they'd get it to the rehab shelter! Since I wasn't doing anything else, I figured why not get tested for covid again! Shrugs* it was a good day!
Test
Ph: Anibal Vecchio
Model: Mili
Production: Stefania Gonzalez Cona
© 2012 Anibal Vecchio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncomercial - No Derivs 3.0 Unported License
About:
Anibal Vecchio, Fashion Filmaker and Photographer from Buenos Aires.
My work:
www.facebook.com/anibalvecchio.arte
My videos:
Testing Mecaface and the EpicFigRig more, first time rigging them all and posing in Blender.
-Sandy/KRS
Areas of the continental United States crossed by more than one nuclear cloud from above ground detonations
From:
Under the Cloud: The Decades of Nuclear Testing
Richard L. Miller
Page 444
Spent some hours to make an attempt at making a lith-copy of a film negative, on kodalith film.
Procedure:
Exposure time around 4 seconds for a 4/5 copy (durst enlarger 250 watt bulb, 80mm f 16)
Need to develop under inxpection, development time around 2-3 minutes on kodak d8 diluted 1-4. Have to pull it at the right time, or all of the film will go black.
This creates a positive copy, this is again contact copyed on another sample of kodalith film (could possibly try other high contrast film). Exposure for this was 19 seconds, 50cm height, 80mm lens f4, durst 805 250 watt (for contact copy light). Development time 3-4 minutes in diluted lith enlarger. Lith enlarger in tray seems to loose efficiency with time, so also need to visual inspect here.
Goal here is to make a negative that would be possible to print with a silk-print technique, this needs a highcontrast 1-bit picture.
Good internet source for working with kodalith:
www.photo.net/discuss/threads/kodak-kodalith-ortho-film.1...
So this dude was definitely just a test model for another shoot, but he looked amazing and go figure I'd love some of the shots I took of him more than those from the actual shoot. :s
YN-560 shot into a brolly more or less straight onto the model.
Haven't given the whole realism thing a go before s thought I'd see how it comes out. Not really that big a fan of realism stuff but quite pleased with these.
Done pretty quickly and not too neat but just tests.
from bit.ly/12lkKQf
Through GoPro Through GoPro - They are heroes, look through their eyes
GoPro Hero3 Black Edition vs Nikon D600 Unscientific Comparison Test This is a very unscientific test. I made this for fun to see how the GoPro High Res Mode…Dive into this GoPro short movie
Hero3
Read more GoPro Hero3 Black Edition vs Nikon D600 Unscientific Comparison Test Thomas
This is a test shot.
I've never used this new computer before, not shot a photo to edit up in a few years (I'm getting back to this camera thing), Canon's DDP and Photomatix have really improved since I used them about 10 years back.
I'm working on getting me sea leg again,so to speak.
Another quick test - the birds were scarce today, the tide was very high and few rocks left for them but I found a few Southern Gull and waited for movement. The composite shows a burst - missed one - only wanted 15 to fit on one page - followed the bird and maintained pretty fine focus. The single crop images are from another sequence where the subject merged into a stationary bird but the camera remained on the moving bird - pretty impressive - day one with my Sony RX10 M4 testing a few features
Used by the drug testing group, a state wide group that only do drug and alcohol testing. Taken in 2006
I was SO happy I got my camera back after I broke it. I took this test shot and then shut it off to put the picture on my computer. I turned it on again, then turned it off again. But it wouldn't close. I kept getting an error message: Lens Error Restart Camera.
I am so upset. I am going back to the place tomorrow, but I have a feeling I'm stuck with a broken camera and I'm out $50 that could have went toward another camera!
Day 137 of 365