View allAll Photos Tagged instanced
Instances of Commediation, 2009
Video still from screen #5
Multi-channel installation,
Non-synchronized video (720p) and audio,
Sound Composition: Joana Sá
Sound Recording and Production: Eduardo Raon
Flythrough, for instance, is a model based on the practice’s Telephone House proposal, into which a USB camera has been inserted. The camera moves along a set path through the model to show off the space in the style of an architecture walkthrough video, projecting its findings on a nearby screen. The twist, however, is that the model has been built entirely to facilitate its video – huge chunks of the building that would remain unseen in the video have simply not been built, with upper elements of the structure instead propped up on spindles to reveal the void below. It feels a visually inventive means of critiquing the manner in which architecture is mediated through images, and the display also gains spice from the real-world sustainability debate surrounding Telephone House, which proposes to demolish an existing building in favour of a new build. What within our current practice and discourse is hollow, what meaningful? Flythrough provides an elegant means of accessing these issues.
[Disegnojournal.com]
Taken from the Exhibition
Supermodels - an exhibition of super architectural models by the Piercy&Co studio - opens 25 November at Regent Quarter, Kings Cross. Piercy&Co will install eight moving and animated models across the eerie setting of an empty central London building site. Supermodels represents the distillation of 20 years of the studio’s design thinking around the importance of the haptic, sensorial and experiential in architecture.
The mechanical automata, projection mapping, sound, light and scent employed by Piercy&Co in Supermodels are not the everyday techniques and products of an architectural project. Rather, they are a creative body of work and an experiment in how far the model can be pushed as a tool for communicating architectural ideas. The models were made over a five year period in Piercy&Co's London studio by the architectural team, between and around projects.
Each super model is based on a building by Piercy&Co - some built, some unbuilt - and abstracted to capture the kernel of the idea behind the building. The ‘coming alive’ of the models through film, sound and movement plays into the mysterious allure of objects with a miniature life of their own - the dolls house, the cuckoo clock, the model railway. The evocation of delight is intentionally egalitarian - an exploration of a mode of architectural communication that is ageless and universal. Supermodels seek to reconnect digital and physical worlds through a childlike sense of wonder and unfiltered joy.
[piercyandco.com]
Go to Page with image in the Internet Archive
Title: British entomology, being illustrations and descriptions of the genera of insects. Found in Great Britain and Ireland. Containing coloured figures from nature of the most rare and beautiful species and in many instances of the plants upon which they are found, Vol. 3
Creator: Curtis, John, 1791-1862. no 89015596
Publisher: London : printed for the author
Sponsor: Wellcome Library
Contributor: Wellcome Library
Date: 1824
Vol: Vol. 3
Language: eng
Published in 8 vols., 1823-40
If you have questions concerning reproductions, please contact the Contributing Library.
Note: The colors, contrast and appearance of these illustrations are unlikely to be true to life. They are derived from scanned images that have been enhanced for machine interpretation and have been altered from their originals.
Read/Download from the Internet Archive
#all_shots #photooftheday #photography #popularpics #popularpage #popular #instagranhub #instanced #instagram #iphoneonly #iphonesia #ipoto #fun #webstagram #beautiful #bastoftheday #instagrammers #ig #igdaily #jj #iphoneography #now #2012 #camera #canon #shoot
29 Likes on Instagram
via andre on metapixl.com metapixl.com/p/andre/796693325371116504
metapixl.com is a pixelfed instance
.
would allow her to stay informing my landlord (when I was staying at Paschimabad) that this was the reason why she was staying. .
Some instances of suicide threats/self-inflicted injury .
In October she rushed to New Delhi Railway station saying she would commit suicide: eventually we could persuade her to return only by telling her that the police would take action if she made any such attempt. .
In November '07, she threatened to commit suicide, sent an SMS to me at late night and also left a suicide note. When we searched, we found her sitting in the Paschimabad bus stop with a noose (made out of her duputta) hung in front of her. .
In February 2008, she called me in serious depressed tone to meet her in front of her hostel. The moment I reached she started hurting herself with a knife and rushed inside the jungle. It took hours for me and some of the acquaintances to track her down. After two days she barged into my room early morning, started hitting me, took my phone, called up my family and started abusing them. When I took away the phone, she rushed out of the room and ran away into the jungle in Paschimabad-Chandrabhaga area. We had to take the help of JNU security guard to rescue her from the jungle, where she was trying to cut her hand with a knife which she was carrying in her bag. Once again, she was taken to AIIMS in JNU ambulance for treatment. This time also she discontinued her medication. .
I had also spoken about Sarlas condition at length to Dr. Patra in the JNU Health Centre. .
Violence against me and others .
She would time again barge into my house in the New Transit house, indulge in violent behaviour, abuse and threaten my relatives (mother or brother-in-law) whosoever is around. I instructed the JNU security guard at the gate to stop her from entering my house. But often she would threaten the guard or use some other pretext to force her way into the Transit house. .
She also invaded my room in the Centre and threatened me. On 26 April she badly hit me in my home whereby causing minor crack on my left hand, for which I was referred to Safdarjung Hospital. .
Things reached massive proportions on 15 and 16 May 2008, when in my absence she barged into my house forcefully by threatening the JNU Security guard in the New Transit House. I was away in Rajasthan on some research work. She forced into my house thrice during these two days. My brother-in-law was at home. She abused him, broke lock of one of the rooms vandalised my house and took away many of my things including the key to the main door lock. On this occasion her father who was around, finally came and took her away. .
My efforts to involve her family .
On every occasion of attempted suicide etc
I on my own initiative informed her family. When they did not respond to my phone calls, I even went all the way to Rajasthan once for the express purpose of letting them know their daughters condition, and appealing to them that they must take responsibility and secure proper help and care for her. .
I wanted her family to realize that she had suicidal tendencies. So on one occasion I spoke to her sister and she (Sarla) agreed to sign a shapath patra in presence of her sister and my Jeejaji (brother-in-law) in which she admitted that she had self-destructive tendencies (atmaghati pravritti). .
Despite this, unfortunately, the family never took it seriously. Though they often visited her in JNU, but they did not arrange any medical treatment nor did give her any sane advise. Instead they would egg her on to pressurize me for marriage, and would even call me to threaten me with violence. Some of her friends too, adopted the same line: instead of trying to make her see reason, concentrate on her studies and stop this obsession with a relation with me, they fanned up her sense of grievance and egged her on to seek revenge. So now it seems she has made it her obsessive goal to either force me to marry her or to make me lose my job. .
Threatening phone calls .
On 20 May, even after my initial letter to the Proctors office, she made 3 calls demanding to come to my house on one pretext or the other. I repeatedly said no, dont come, categorically, and yet she insisted on coming. Eventually she again barged into my house and took away my pen drive and my MP 3 player on which were some recordings of her threatening phone calls. These 3 calls in which she is insisting on coming to my house in spite of my explicit refusal, are on record. There are also other calls of which I have a record: in which her father .
.
.
via andre on metapixl.com metapixl.com/p/andre/791599197237314748
metapixl.com is a pixelfed instance
Hair Styles Ideas :
Illustration
Description
Are you going to have a themed wedding? For instance you may want all of your bridesmaids to have their hair up in a bun so they all are consistent or let them all go freestyle and show off their character.
-Read More –
- #Hairstyle
listfender.com/beauty/hairstyle/hair-styles-ideas-are-you...
Some tips and strategies gold instance wow leveling guide
topwowlevelingguide.net/wow-leveling-guide-making-gold-in...
.
According to her investigations Shahina finds out that many of the witnesses have things to say that goes against the police story. For instance, Yoganand, a BJP worker whose testimony is recorded in the charge sheet, Shahina reports, does not even know that he is a witness in the Madany case ! According to Police charge sheet Jose Vargese is the prime witness in the 2008 Bangalore bomb blast case. But Jose Vargese says his testimony is forged. "This is unbelievable. I never imagined that the police could fabricate a case like this".But few days after K.K.Shahina's report comes out in Tehelka, , the Karnataka police slaps a case against Shahina under JPC 506, for "intimidating the .
witnesses." No stretch of imagination allows one to view the attempt of a journalist to talk to the witnesses in a particular case as 'intimidation. Shahina writes in her status message in Facebook:/lthis is not a case against me as an individual, but it is a warning to the elitire press communitv not to trv to quash the cooked up stories by the police." .
Objective analysis into maudany's.,arrest and incarceration in the Bangalore case will prove to us that there is a clever .
and well-planned conspiracy behind it. Maudany's arrest was the national interest of the Sangh Parivar. The group has a .
very clear anti-muslim interest in this case. There is American interest in the case, too, especially after the 9/11 and in .
the context of vilification of Muslim community at the global level. The case against Maudany is not just a political .
conspiracy but rather a conspiracy of the communal societal set-up and judiciary, says Jagadish Chandra, the prominent .
human rights activist in India. Maudany talked about the denial of basic and other human rights to Muslims in the .
context of the same happening with regard to the dalits, bahujans and other minorities in Kerala. He also put forward .
the formulation, "power to the avarnas and liberation to the oppressed"(avarnankku athikaram, peeditharkku .
mochanam). This kind of an emphasis on caste was being revived by the resurgence of the Dalit movement in the 80s. .
However, when this was articulated from the side of a Muslim religious scholar who clearly asserted his Islamic roots .
and who held out a hope towards a greater alliance between the oppressed classes in Kerala, this became extremely .
threatening to the hitherto dominant positions. Says Maudany at the time of demoJishion of Babari Masjid: 'Even if a .
thousand mosques are demolished, not a single fist full of sand should be removed from any temple, my children!'. .
How can a person of such a vision be branded a terrorist?! Asking K.P.Sasi The eminent documentary director and a .
former JNU'ite. He also says Maudany's imprisonment is also a deep critical statement on the status of lslamophobic .
mainstream media in kerala. The Police acted on political intersts, media wrote w hat the Police said and people .
believed what media wrote.Such an affair is not just limited to Maudany. This era of silent emergency has produced .
more political prisoners than the emergency of seventies. The targets are Muslims, Oallts, Adivasis, .
Self-determination movements and People's movements. .
"Maudany issue is not only the issue of a political party or a group of people. This has to do with the public space as a whole. This poses several questions regarding our police, intelligence and criminal justice system" This excerpts from a statement undersigned by honourable Justice VR Krishna lyer and other human rights and cultural activists. Indian Catholic Orthodox Church chief Basolious marthoma claimed that the Kerala government and media should intervene urgently to save Maudani's life. He is not getting the required medical requirement which is very necessary. He said he had visited Maudany at Bangalore central prison. 'Maudany has lost 80 percent of his eyesight owing to diabetes' he said. 'I Believe that the case is fabricated,' he said adding that Justice delayed to him is justice denied. .
We strongly condemn the cont inuing pre-planned Rejection of bail to Maudany. The prosecution has been making new 'cooked stories' against him. We know that not even a single witness has stated anything against him . .
. .
ft is clear that the case against Maudany is fabricated. What justice is being respected when t he court says that a person who had suffered 10vears' prison life for no reasons, has been acquitted by the court citing his innocence, and is suffering the same travails with critically worsened health. does not deserve bail? We SIO (Students Islamic organization of India) JNU Unit request all the democratic and human rights forces In JNU as well as in this country to come forward to support the struggle for JUSTICE FOR MAUDANY. No justice will come as a charity. Maudany struggled for it. Now it is up to us. .
.
Instances of Commediation, 2009
Video still from screen #1
Multi-channel installation,
Non-synchronized video (720p) and audio,
Sound Composition: Joana Sá
Sound Recording and Production: Eduardo Raon
"Marrant" .... je venais de faire la Botanica en mode Hero, seule instance faite de la journée... et voilà le message en voulant entrer dans le Mecha (rires)
Go to Page 772 in the Internet Archive
Title: Anomalies and curiosities of medicine : being an encyclopedic collection of rare and extraordinary cases, and of the most striking instances of abnormality in all branches of medicine and surgery, derived form an exhaustive research of medical literature from its origin to the present day, abstracted, classified, annotated, and indexed
Creator: Gould, George M. (George Milbry), 1848-1922
Creator: Pyle, Walter L. (Walter Lytle), 1871-1921
Publisher: Philadelphia : W.B. Saunders
Sponsor: MSN
Contributor: Gerstein - University of Toronto
Date: 1900
Language: eng
Description: Bibliography: p. 915-929
14
If you have questions concerning reproductions, please contact the Contributing Library.
Note: The colors, contrast and appearance of these illustrations are unlikely to be true to life. They are derived from scanned images that have been enhanced for machine interpretation and have been altered from their originals.
Read/Download from the Internet Archive
Instances of Commediation, 2009
Video still from screen #3
Multi-channel installation,
Non-synchronized video (720p) and audio,
Sound Composition: Joana Sá
Sound Recording and Production: Eduardo Raon
.
RALLY BEHIND THE JNUSU TO UPHOLD ITS SANCTITY AND PRESTIGE! EXPOSE THE HYPOCRISY AND SURRENDER BY THE ULTRA-LEFTII .
AISF.
SFI .
July 25, 2007Dear Friends.
Th~ pamphlet issued by AI SA yesterday was yet another instance of their hypocrisy on the one hand and their failure to uphold the sanctity and prestige of the JNUSU on the other. AISA has made three claims in its pamphlet: (i) The JNUSU office-bearers from the SFI-AISF are violating UGBM resolutions regarding the incident 0'1 19th February; (ii) The refusal of the JNUSU office-bearers from the SFI-AISF to submit letters of regret violates the agreement signed between the JNUSU and the administration and (iii) SFI-AISF is trying to break students' unity. Each one of these arguments is .
fallacious and sinister..
Who is violating UGBM Resolutions?.
.
The UGBM held on 8th March 2007 was held in the backdrop of the JNUSU Council meeting expressing regret for the 19th February incident (the .
AISA representatives abstained on voting in the Council). Following the Council meeting, the JNUSU office-bearers along with some other students who were suspended, had already expressed regret on the lines of the. JNUSU .council reS?Iution. It was the DSU which defied the Cou~cil Resolution and refused to express regret. The UGBM endorsed the JNUSU Council Resolution expressmg regret on the 19th February Incident and rejected the DSU line of not expressing regret. It further resolved that upon expression of regret there should be no disciplinary action on any student and therefore no Proctorial enquiry Into the matter. The JNUSUPresident communicated the UGBM resolution to the administration the very next day and the Proctorial Enquiry was boycotted by the JNUSU. Nobody from the SFI-AISF ever went to depose before the Proctorial enquiry. However, the submission of regret letters by the suspended students of DSU following the UGBM, was not in keeping with the JNUSU resolution:they regretted the "Inconvenience caused, ifany".That .
was aviolation of the UGBM resolution by the DSU..
It was in keeping with the UGBM resolution that the JNUSU launched an ag~ation against the rustication of 8 students and fine imposed upon the office-bearers, under the leadership of the JNUSU President from SFI-AISF. When the Administration agreed to reconsider the punishment on the .
basis of an appeal expressing regret, the JNUSU office-bearers from SFI-AISF categorically refused to submit any appeal once again. It was the AISA and the General Secretary of the JNUSU who were more than willing to submit regret letters, disregarding the letter and spirit of the UGBM resolution. Since SFI-AISF understands the concerns of the rusticated students, whose student life is at stake, it did not oppose an agreement with the administration on this basis. However, submission of any regret letter by the JNUSUoffice-bearers was categorically opposed by the SFI-AISF because the UGBM never mandated the JNUSU office-bearers to express regret on an individual basis. The minutes of the JNUSU Council and all-organization meetings held at the administrative block before signing the agreement with the administration would clearly show the various positions in that debate. JNUSU office-bearars .
had already expressed regret on the lines.. of the JNUSU Council resolution even before the UGBM was held! Therefore, it is the General Secretary of the .
JNUSU from the AI SA who owes an explanation to the stt,dent community for submitting another regret letter! Did the General Secretary of the JNUSU seek the opinion of the student community before submitting another regret letter? Afraid of confronting the administration any more, even on legitimate grounds, the General Secretary of the JNUSU has meekly surrendered before the administration. Now, in order to justify his act of cowardice and opportunism, the AI SA is leveling baseless charges against the SFI-AISF of violating UGBM resolution. Let the AI SA mention one resolution passed in the UGBM which mandates the JNUSU office-bearers to submit another regret letter. Where Is the Breach of the Agreement?.
The AISA has correctly pointed out that the agreement with the administration states: "The Vice chancellor has agreed to reconsider the punishment based on the Proctorial decision with regard to the incident that took place on 19th February 2007 on receiving individual letters of regret with an appeal from concerned students to enable them to register by 14" August 2007". However, that JNUSU office-bearers have to make an appeal for seeking registration by 14111 August 2007 is indeed a strange interpretation of the agreement on AISA's part because the JNUSU office-bearers have not been denied registration in the first place; they have only been fined. This agreement is only meant for those students who have been rusticated and .
hence denied registration. The SFI-AISF sticks to the position that the fines levied on the JNUSU office-bearers, on the basis of the charge that they were unable to control the situation', should be revoked unconditionally. The SFI-AISF would have liked to see all the punishments revoked unconditionally in.
'.
keeping with the UGBM resolution. However, since the rusticated students had agreed to make an appeal to the administration expressing regret once again, the SFI-AISF did not want to stand in the way of the revocation of their rustication. However, if anybody has breached the agreement, In the sense of going overboard In placating the administration, it Is the General Secretai'IJ of the JNUSU, because the administration has never demanded any regret by the JNUSU office-bearers In the first place. In fact the SFI-AISF is shocked and dismayed by this supine attitude displayed .
by the General Secretary who is trying to bend backwards to appease the administration. Would he have the bac.kbone to face the administration ever .
again and fight against anti-student move~? We doubt It strongly. It is indeed shameful for the AISA to have allowed the General Secretary to submit a regret letter and then accusing the SFI-AISF of trying to be "good boys before the administration. This is aclassic case of hypocrisy. .
Who Is Disrupting Student Unity?AI SA has accused the SFI-AISF of disrupting the unity of the students. This is in keeping with their unethical and immoral politics. The JNUSU President is yet to recover from the after-effects of the arduous indefinite hunger strike that he led from the front against the punishment of the students and the students' charter of demands. The entire university was witness to the steadfast commitment of the SFI-AISF activists to student unity when they worked tirelessly during the difficult agitation In order to make it a success. How easily the AI SA glosses over these facts for sectarian ends. We want to .
ask some simple questions to the AISA. Do they genuinely regret the incident of 19th February? If so, who do they hold responsible for it? As far as .
the JNUSU office-bearers from the SFI-AISF are concerned, they did not participate in the gherao of the Registrar, but could not prevent it from happening. They have already offered regret'for that. But some students did tie a rope around the car of the Registrar, some deflated the tyres, some .
smeared black paint on the car and one student climbed on the top of the car and shouted slogans. Who were they? Was there a collective" decision of the JNUSU or the UGBM to indulge in all these acts? AISA should either categorically deny their role on 19th February (which we know they can't because they issued a pamphlet celebrating the 'gherao') or accept responsibility for the same. If the AISA's parameters for expressing solidarity with workers' rights or upholding student unity imply lying to the student community or justifying these adventurist acts, we are sorry we cannot pass the test. The Proctorial enquiry has nothing to do with this: the JNUSU has already rejected the punishments based on the Proctorial enquiry and fought to reverse them. However, AISA should not suffer from the illusion that they can obfuscate their adventurist role on 19th February before the student community, riding piggy back upon the successful agitation led by the JNUSU. The students of JNU would expect them not to repeat such stupid feats in t the JNU student movement. The sanctity and prestige of the JNUSU is supreme, since it embodies the collective spirit of the JNU.
future, which discredistudent community. The JNUSU office-bearers from the SFI-AISF would not submit any more appeal expressing regret. SFI-AISF demands that their fines be revoked unconditionally. If AISA does not support this position, let them at least not come in the way. Any effort on their part to collude with the administration against the SFI-AISF would.not be forgiven by the student community. .
Sd/· Rajiv Ranjan, Secy. SFI-JNU Sd/-Fauzan Abrar, Jt. Secy., AJSF-JNU .
.
.
late at night, dressing according to their own choice and taking independent decisions about entering into or coming out of.
relationships. Liberty and freedom for woman in many such instances achieved through a difficult and relentless struggle by.
the student community for sure comes as surprise to many of us including women who for the first time enter this university..
But most of us receive such liberty and freedom not as an unfortunate shock but with appreciation of how freedom and.
equality among genders only help in better and mature understanding about each other. Generations of students in this.
campus have experienced how a freer interaction among not only the two genders but people coming from different.
regional and cultural backgrounds have helped in better understanding of the `other' and breaking down of several.
stereotypes about the `other'. The atmosphere of freedom is not only liberating for women but also for men who now can.
share a space of friendship based on equality which is so uncommon otherwise..
.
Then how is this newness of equality and freedom supposed to generate `shock' for only one gender and thus making them.
helpless to get into such obsessive mode of violence? In fact, aren't those who believe that `culture shock' leads men to get into.
the `stalking' or `violent' mode, actually disturbed by the breaking down of unequal hierarchical relationship between the two.
genders more than anything else? While it is important to create an inclusive atmosphere of co-operation so that people.
from different cultural backgrounds do not feel alienated in a new atmosphere, any attempt to deny the existence of.
patriarchal common sense in the name of confusion created due to `culture shock' is only an escape route and not.
honest attempt to address the issue..
.
The act of violence of 31st July has also been named as a natural outburst of hurt feeling due to a sense of rejection. We are.
asked if the woman was sufficiently `sensitive' and `convincing' in her `explanations' for breaking off or rejecting a relationship..
If she said `NO' rudely, we are told, it would very naturally create a disturbance in a male's psychology who then is forced to.
take such extreme steps. Again, have we ever thought: how does it become so natural for us to think that a woman saying `NO'.
to a relationship is more rude and unjustified as compared to a man saying `NO'? Why is it that a woman's act of independence.
by saying `NO' is seen as `naturally' generating a violent reaction by the man who has been rejected? Are woman never.
rejected in a relationship? Does not it generate a sense of grief and hurt among them? Will we accept it as `natural' and.
`acceptable' if a woman who is rejected were to respond in the same violent and oppressive way? Isn't it perhaps the case that.
in a relationship, a woman is seen to be `possessed' by her partner, and that is why it is only she who does not have the right.
to enter or come out of a relationship according to her own choice? Don't popular films and songs survive on everyday.
manufacturing of the ideas of women as objects of desire to be possessed? Many of us may remember appreciating the tunes.
of `tu ha kar ya na kar...tu hai meri kiran', without being able to understand how the denial of a woman's agency becomes.
naturalized through nice music and an entertaining plot. Or lately, the portrayal of a `heartless' and `disloyal' woman who has.
rejected a boy has been collectively enjoyed by all of us through the beats of `kolaveri' is also a part of the process of.
naturalization of the idea of a rude woman who says `NO'. A `NO' is also often interpreted as `hotho pen na dil pe ha hoyenga'.
thus disrespecting her ability to take decisions for herself..
.
While many of us in JNU would accept that institutions like khap panchayats should not exist in a democracy, that acid attacks.
on women are not acceptable or attacking a woman with a cleaver is inhuman, have we really been able to acknowledge that.
only this much is not enough? Unless we critically look into our ideas about women in every aspect of life and respect their right.
to express consent or denial at any stage of relationship of intimacy, we will only continue to nurture a mindset which.
eventually could manifest itself through an attack with a cleaver. There are manifold small acts of `possessiveness' and.
aggression (obsessive, repeated smses and phone calls, etc) which we accept as `chalta hai'... which all help to create the.
climate where an attack with a cleaver is waiting to happen..
.
The task ahead for ensuring a gender-just campus.
.
Although the incident of 31st July has shaken the campus, the campus community has accepted the task of deep introspection.
and accepted the challenges for building a gender-just, violence free and truly liberating campus space for people from all the.
genders, regional, cultural and economic background. This is still the campus which responds with responsibility in cases of.
such gender violence and ensures several other forms of freedom such as free movement for both the genders in campus.
spaces. The radical student movement in JNU has ensured the establishment of Gender Sensitisation Committee Against.
Sexual Harassment following the guidelines of Vishakha Judgment by the Supreme Court. The previous JNUSU in 2012 demanded.
institutionalisation of the gender sensitization program at the beginning of academic year which had been achieved through.
a consistent pressure by the students. The demand by the previous JNUSU for preparing a gender sensitization module and.
making it a part of curriculum in every discipline was passed by the School of Social Sciences Board of Studies .The task now is.
to ensure that such a module is prepared at the earliest. Transforming ideas about gender stereotypes can be achieved.
through a dialogue among the campus community about gender relations and women's autonomy..
.
5 July 2013.
.
Akbar, President, AISA, JNU Sandeep Saurav, Gen. Secy, AISA, JNU.
..
An instance of i like the shot but i wish it was in better focus, i have trouble around dusk as the sun is starting to fall below the horizon.
Unfortunately, in most instances, the home insurance does not cover foggy windows. And the reasons are that the window seals are easy to repair and you can fix them yourself and the cost to clean foggy windows in Ottawa is less than the deductibles.
www.evernote.com/shard/s541/client/snv?noteGuid=c8ed1147-...
.
RALLY BEHIND THE JNUSU TO UPHOLD ITS SANCTITY AND PRESTIGEI EXPOSE THE HYPOCRISY AND SURRENDER BY THE ULTRA-LEFTII AISF.
SFI .
July 25, 2007 .
Dear Friends, .
The pamphlet issued by AISA yesterday was yet another instance of their hypocrisy on the one hand and their failure to uphold the sanctity and .
prestige of the JNUSU on the other. AISA has made three claims in its pamphlet: (i) The JNUSU office-bearers from the SFI-AISF are violating UGBM .
resolutions regarding the incident on 19th February; (ii) The refusal of the JNUSU office-bearers from the SFI-AISF to submit letters of regret violates the agreement signed between the JNUSU and the administration and (iii) SFI-AISF is trying to break students' unity. Each one of these arguments is .
fallacious and sinister. .
Who is violating UGBM Resolutions? .
.
The UGBM held on 8th March 2007 was held in the backdrop of the JNUSU Council meeting expressing regret for the 19th February incident (the .
AISA representatives abstained on voting in the Council). Following the Council meeting, the JNUSU office-bearers along with some other students who .
were suspended, had already expressed regret on the lines of the JNUSU Council resolution. It was the DSU which defied the Council Resolution and refused to express regret. The UGBM endorsed the JNUSU Council Resolution expressing regret on the 19th February incident and rejected the DSU line of not expressing regret. It further resolved that upon expression of regret there should be no disciplinary action on any student and therefore no Proctorial enquiry into the matter. The JNUSU President communicated lhe UGBM resolution to the administration the very next day and the Proctorial Enquiry was boycotted by the JNUSU. Nobody from the SFI-AISF ever went to depose before the Proctorial enquiry. However, the submission of regret letters by the .
suspended students of DSU following the UGBM, was not in keeping with the JNUSU resolution: they regretted the uinconvenience caused, ifany". That .
was aviolation of the UGBM resolution by the DSU. .
It was in keeping with the UGBM resolution that the JNUSU launched an agitation against the rustication of 8 students and fine imposed upon the office-bearers, under the leadership of the JNUSU President from SFI-AISF. When the Administration agreed to reconsider the punishment on the .
the General Secretary of the JNUSU Who were more than willing to submit regret letters, disregarding the letter and spirit of the UGBM resolution. Since SFI-AISF understands the concerns of the rusticated students, whose student life is at stake, it did not oppose an agreement with the administration on.
basis of an appeal expressing regret, the JNUSU office-bearers from SFI-AISF categorically refused to submit any appeal once again. It was the AISA and .
this basis. However, submission of any regret letter by the JNUSU office-bearers. was categorically opposed by the SFI-AISF because the UGBM never .
mandated the JNUSU office-bearers to express regret on an individual basis.The minutes of the JNUSU Council and all-organization meetings held at the .
administrative block before signing the agreement with the administration would clearly show the various positions in that debate. JNUSU office-bearars .
had already expressed regret on the lines:of the JNUSU Council resolution eve,l before the UGBM was held! Therefore, it is the General Secretary of the .
~.
~ JNUSU from the AISA who owes an explanation to the student community for ~ubmitting another regret letter! Did the General Secretary of theJNUSU .
1I< seek the opinion of the student community before submitting another regret letter? Afraid of confronting the administration any more, even on legitimate grounds, the General Secretary of the JNUSU has meekly surrendered before the administration. Now, in order to justify his act of cowardice and opportunism, the AISA is leveling baseless charges against the SFI-AISF of violating UGBM resolution. Let the AISA mention one resolution passed .
in the UGBM which mandates the JNUSUoffice-bearers to submit another regret letter. .
Where isthe Breach of the Agreement? .
.
~ .
The AISA has correctly pointed out that the agreement with the administration states: "The Vice chancellor has agreed to reconsider the punishment based on the Proctorial decision with regard to the incident that took place on 19th February 2007 on receiving individual letters of regret with an appeal from concerned students to enable them to register by 14th August 2007". However, th3t JNUSU office-bearers have to make: an appaai for seeking registration by 14th August 2007 is indeed a strange interpretation of the agreement on AISA's part because the JNUSU office-bearers have not .
0.
~ been denied registration in the first place; they have only been fined. This agreement is only meant for those students who have been rusticated and .
hence denied registration. The SFI-AISF sticks to the position that the fines levied on the JNUSU office-bearers, on the basis of the charge that they were.
eij .
'unable to control the situation', should be revoked unconditionally. The SFI-AISF would have liked to see all the punishments revoked unconditionally in .
keeping with the UGBM resolution. However, since the rusticated students had agreed to make an appeal to the administration expressing regret once.
........ .
.
again, the SFI-AISF did not want to stand in the way of the revocation of their rustication. However, if anybody has breached the agreement, in the.
~ ~ .
sense of going overboard in placating the administration, it is the General Secretary of the JNUSU, because the administration has never .
by the General Secretary who is trying to bend backwards to appease the administration. Would he have the backbone to face the administration ever.
~t demanded any regret by the JNUSU office-bearers in the first place. In fact the SFI-AISF is shocked and dismayed by this supine attitude displayed .
~ again and fight against anti-student moves? We doubt it strongly. It is indeed shameful for the AISA to have allowed the General Secretary to subm:t a .
t regret letter and then accusing the SFI-AISF of trying to be "good boys" before the administration. This is a classic case of hypocrisy. .
z~.
~~ Who is Disrupting Student Unity?Ulq AISA has accused the SFI-AISF of disrupting the unity of the students. This is in keeping with their unethical and immoral politics. The JNUSU ~ti President is yet to recover from the after-effects of the arduous indefinite hunger strike that he led from the front against the punishment of the students .
and the students' charter of demands. The entire university was witness to the steadfast commttment of the SFI-AISF activists to student unity when they ~~ worked tirelessly during the difficult agitation in order to make it a success. How easily the AISA glosses over these facts for sectarian ends. We want to 1-1 ask some simple questions to the AJSA. Do they genuinely regret the incident of 19th February? If so, who do they hold responsible for it? As far as .
the JNUSU office-bearers from the SFI-AISF are concerned, they did not participate in the gherao of the Registrar, but could not prevent it from .
happening. They have already offered regret for that. But some students did tie a rope around the car of the Registrar, some deflated the tyres, some .
smeared black paint on the car and one student climbed on the top of the car and shouted siogans. Who were they? Was there a "collective" decision of 't because< the JNUSU or the UGBM to indulge in all these acts? AISA should either cate~orically deny their role on 19th February (which we know they can~ they issued a pamphlet celebrating the 'gherao') or accept responsibility for the same. If the AISA's parameters for expressing solidarity wrth workers' .
t=o rights or upholding student unity imply lying to the student community or justifying these adventurist acts, we are sorry we cannot pass the test. The ~~I Proctorial enquiry has nothing to do with this: the JNUSU has already rejected the punishments based on the Proctorial enquiry and fought to reverse them. However, AISA should not suffer from the illusion that they can obfuscate their adventurist role on 19th February before the student .
future, which discredit the JNU student movement. The sanctity and prestige of the JNUSU is supreme, since it embodies the collective spirit of the JNU.
community, riding piggy back upon the successful agitation led by the JNUSU. The students of JNU would expect them not to repeat such stupid feats in .
student community. The JNUSU office-bearers from the SFI-AISF would not submit any more appeal expressing regret. SFI-AISF demands that their fines .
be revoked unconditionally. If AISA does not support this position, let them at least not come in the way. Any effort on their part to collude with the Sdl-Rapv Ranjan, Secy. SFI..JNU.
administration against the SFI-AISF would.not be forgiven by the student community. Sd/· Fauzan Abrar, Jt Secy., AJSF..JNU .
.
Go to Page with image in the Internet Archive
Title: British entomology, being illustrations and descriptions of the genera of insects. Found in Great Britain and Ireland. Containing coloured figures from nature of the most rare and beautiful species and in many instances of the plants upon which they are found, Vol. 3
Creator: Curtis, John, 1791-1862. no 89015596
Publisher: London : printed for the author
Sponsor: Wellcome Library
Contributor: Wellcome Library
Date: 1824
Vol: Vol. 3
Language: eng
Published in 8 vols., 1823-40
If you have questions concerning reproductions, please contact the Contributing Library.
Note: The colors, contrast and appearance of these illustrations are unlikely to be true to life. They are derived from scanned images that have been enhanced for machine interpretation and have been altered from their originals.
Read/Download from the Internet Archive
70 Shaman Blooregard (Healer)
66 Hunter Eilynn (DPS, pet offtank)
67 Rogue Fizzwidget (DPS)
68 Paladin Cathormac (Tank, off healer)
Instances of Commediation, 2009
Video still from screen #4
Multi-channel installation,
Non-synchronized video (720p) and audio,
Sound Composition: Joana Sá
Sound Recording and Production: Eduardo Raon
Some humans are answer-oriented, and in instances of uncertainty when there aren’t firm solutions to many questions, they'll be feeling frustrated with the modern scenario. Those are pitta types. While pittas are balanced, they may give you strategic solutions to the brand new demanding situations and upward thrust to the occasion, but if out of balance, they may be feeling indignant and cranky.
They mainly can be feeling annoyed that they can not interact in their usual sports proper now, as pittas like to “do” and sense efficiency. Finding things to do in a brand new way will assist:
Take virtual museum toursWatch that documentary you’ve been that means to observelocate methods to help others inside the context of social distancing, which includes coaching loved ones a way to use era to attach certainlyOr higher but, take this time to slow down a chunk and rebalance. This is an in particular vital time to be aware of the balance of hobby and rest.
In case you are an over doer, take the opportunity proper now to reconnect to self-care practices. In case you tend to short-trade on sleep, make certain to get 7-eight hours of herbal, restful sleep to stay balanced and wholesome and hold your immune gadget robust. You can locate that by means of taking time to reconnect on your practices right now, you may be greater effective universal at the same time as retaining balance.
For Help click the link below:
onlinehavan.in/ onlinehavan.in/balance-your-pitta-during-coronavirus/
This is the first black and white conversion that I've attempted using the Photoshop CS3 Beta. The b&w adjustment layer feature is wonderful. There's any eyedropper that you can click anywhere in the image and then the color slider that affects that tone will light up. For instance, I wanted the sky to be darker so I clicked on that and the blue slider lit up. Blue for the sky is kind of obvious, but oftentimes it's not. For the side panel marquees the yellow slider lit up. I wouldn't have guessed that one right away. Great new feature.
The instance when the moon becomes full
And darkness cannot conquer the bright light
This so sharp silver light
Reflects numerous silhouettes of your inner harmony.
Oh! My dearest dream!
Magical moment revives!
The quintessence of your soul
In consciousness of the greatest mind!
Garland of stars crowns your constantly changing image
Which whisper something to you
Fulfilling the universe with
Lightness and craziness
Valentina Iofe, Валентина Иофе.,.,,