View allAll Photos Tagged existentialism
"Huis Clos" Play Rehearsal In Progress. Follow us www.mesmeriseme.co.uk/what-is-hell, twitter.com/#!/HuisClos_2011, www.facebook.com/pages/Huis-Clos-MesmeriseMe-2011/1212970...
I arrange my values so that this sculpture is phenomenal in a subjective version of the way I value my existence.
Attention is often treated as a neutral faculty, as though it were merely the mind’s flashlight cast upon an otherwise unchanged world. But attention is never that innocent. What we dwell upon does not simply occupy our sight; it disciplines it. It trains perception by teaching the soul what to treat as central, what to ignore, what to magnify, and what to render peripheral. This image turns toward that formative power. The room is dim, almost withdrawn, while one illuminated object gathers the man’s gaze and quietly governs the scene. He does not appear frantic or overwhelmed. He appears oriented. That is the deeper matter. The object before him is not merely being viewed. It is becoming a center around which his field of perception is reorganized.
That structure belongs deeply to the lived-world of Confessions to the Empty Chair. The book repeatedly shows that a human being does not become what he explicitly worships only in overtly religious terms. He also becomes what he habitually attends to. Attention is a moral and existential act long before it is a philosophical theme. The self is shaped by repeated acts of looking. What receives sustained notice begins to exert formative pressure. It enters the architecture of desire, memory, interpretation, and expectation. In that sense, attention is not passive observation. It is apprenticeship. The soul learns its world by lingering, and what it lingers over leaves marks.
Phenomenologically, this image concerns the way a focal point discloses and conceals simultaneously. To attend is always to select, and selection is never costless. The illuminated object clarifies one region of the world while dimming the rest. What falls outside the beam does not cease to exist, but it loses practical reality for the one who has been captured by a narrower horizon. The man’s face receives the upward glow of what he is watching, and that detail matters because it shows attention becoming inscription. He is not only looking at something. He is being lit by it. His features are being configured by the source that has claimed his gaze. This is not merely visual. It is ontological in miniature. What holds our attention begins to cast its light upon us, determining not only what we see but how we stand in relation to everything else.
In Confessions to the Empty Chair, this is one of the book’s most serious undercurrents. The struggle of a life is not always first visible in decisions. It is often visible in fixations. What one returns to inwardly, what one rehearses, what one cannot stop contemplating, what one uses to soothe, excite, justify, or escape—these reveal the actual liturgies of the self. The book understands that attention forms a hidden economy. A person may profess one order of values while actually kneeling, inwardly, before another center. He may claim to seek truth while feeding on distraction, claim to long for communion while training himself upon substitutes, claim to desire the good while repeatedly gazing at what diminishes him. In this way, attention becomes one of the most revealing dimensions of a life because it shows not merely declared belief, but functional devotion.
Psychologically, attention is formative because consciousness cannot give itself everywhere with equal intensity. What is repeatedly foregrounded acquires emotional density. Neural pathways are not the whole story, but they are part of it. Habituation of gaze becomes habituation of significance. The mind learns what to expect, what to crave, what to monitor, and what to dismiss. Over time, this does not simply influence mood. It shapes identity. One becomes a certain kind of perceiver. The world appears according to the disciplines one has undergone. A person trained by resentment sees affronts everywhere. A person trained by lust sees bodies differently. A person trained by fear reads threat into ambiguity. A person trained by reverence notices what the hurried self would miss. Attention is therefore not an inert channel through which reality passes. It is a pattern of formation that configures reality’s apparent meaning.
This is why the title matters so much. “It Shaped What I Could See” does not say merely that the object occupied the man’s time. It says that his capacity for perception itself was being schooled by the thing he faced. Such a statement carries theological weight. In the deeper traditions of moral and spiritual reflection, worship is not only what one confesses with lips or performs in explicitly sacred settings. Worship is what organizes love, gaze, trust, and sacrifice. Whatever becomes the practical center of one’s orientation begins to function as lord of the field. It need not be grand. It need only become central. Confessions to the Empty Chair understands this with unsettling precision. The soul is always being bent by its centers, whether worthy or unworthy. What it kneels before inwardly determines what sort of world it is able to inhabit.
The dimness of the room intensifies the point because it reveals how totalizing attention can become. Everything outside the immediate object recedes into secondary status. The environment is still present, but no longer decisive. Such narrowing is not always evil; attention can also be the condition of love, craft, prayer, and serious thought. But the image is interested in the ambiguity of this power. To be oriented is necessary for human life. The question is never whether one will be oriented, but by what. The soul cannot avoid giving itself to something. Its eyes will learn to bend somewhere. The danger arises when the center one has chosen—or the center that has quietly chosen one—begins to train perception away from reality rather than into it.
Within the world of the book, this makes attention one of the hidden battlegrounds of human becoming. The great crises of a life are not only dramatic moral episodes. They are also the long disciplines of seeing that precede those episodes. What a person attends to in secret, what he returns to in boredom, what he stares at when left unguarded, what he allows to hold him—these are not trivial habits. They are seeds of future worlds. They prepare what will later feel obvious, desirable, justified, or inevitable.
In the end, this image does not condemn looking. It reveals its seriousness. The man sits in the dark, not merely observing but being formed under a particular light. That is the human condition in miniature. We are always under some illumination. We are always learning from what we behold. And what we behold, if given enough time and trust, does more than occupy our vision. It teaches us what the world is for. It trains the range of what we can see. It shapes not only our choices, but the very horizon within which choices become imaginable.
The only bench in this cemetery (pretty much) is right in front of this grave. There's also a conveniently shady tree so you can hang out all afternoon and be existential with the first couple of existentialism.
The natural reflections of the sand create a symmetry in this print that evokes a sense of existentialism: do all we see, hear, and feel in our travels actually exist, or are they shadows of a another truer reality we can only vaguely grasp.