View allAll Photos Tagged existentialism
"Huis Clos" Play Rehearsal In Progress. Follow us www.mesmeriseme.co.uk/what-is-hell, twitter.com/#!/HuisClos_2011, www.facebook.com/pages/Huis-Clos-MesmeriseMe-2011/1212970...
" The Old Man and the Sea " by Ernest Hemingway
1) Introduction:
"The Old Man and the Sea" is a novella written by Ernest Hemingway and published in 1952. It tells the story of an aging Cuban fisherman named Santiago, who has gone 84 days without catching a fish. The novella explores themes of perseverance, determination, and the struggle against nature.
2) Summary:
The story is set in a small fishing village in Cuba and follows Santiago, an old and experienced fisherman. He is considered unlucky by the other villagers as he has not caught a fish in a long time. Determined to prove himself, Santiago sets out alone in his small skiff into the Gulf Stream, far from the shore.
After a few days at sea, Santiago finally hooks a giant marlin. He battles with the fish for days, enduring physical pain and exhaustion. Despite his efforts, the marlin is too strong and drags Santiago further out to sea. Santiago's determination and respect for the marlin grow as he admires its strength and endurance.
Eventually, Santiago manages to kill the marlin, but he faces another challenge as he tries to bring it back to the shore. Sharks are attracted to the blood and begin to attack the marlin, devouring most of it. Santiago fights off the sharks with his harpoon, but by the time he reaches the shore, only the marlin's skeleton remains.
Santiago returns to the village, exhausted and defeated, but the other fishermen are amazed by the size of the marlin's skeleton. Despite losing the physical evidence of his triumph, Santiago gains the respect of the villagers and the boy who had been his apprentice.
3) Critical Analysis:
"The Old Man and the Sea" is considered one of Hemingway's greatest works and won him the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction in 1953. The novella is known for its simple yet powerful prose, which reflects Hemingway's minimalist writing style.
One of the main themes explored in the novella is the struggle against nature. Santiago's battle with the marlin symbolizes the human struggle against the forces of nature and the inevitability of defeat. Despite his physical limitations and the odds stacked against him, Santiago's determination and resilience are admirable.
Another theme is the importance of pride and honor. Santiago's pride drives him to prove himself as a skilled fisherman, even in the face of ridicule and doubt from others. His honor is evident in his respect for the marlin, as he sees it as a worthy opponent rather than a mere catch.
"The Old Man and the Sea" also delves into the concept of existentialism. Santiago's solitary journey and his internal thoughts reflect the existentialist idea of individualism and the search for meaning in life. The novella explores the human condition and the struggle to find purpose and significance in the face of adversity.
Overall, "The Old Man and the Sea" is a profound and timeless tale that explores themes of perseverance, honor, and the human struggle against nature. Hemingway's masterful storytelling and vivid descriptions make it a classic work of literature.
Silence is often mistaken for emptiness because it does not announce itself in the ways noise does. It does not press forward with argument. It does not demand recognition through spectacle. It does not insist on its own meaning. For that reason, many people experience silence first as lack: lack of voice, lack of interruption, lack of event, lack of reply. But lived experience teaches something more difficult. Silence is rarely mere absence. It has texture, pressure, contour, and consequence. It shapes the soul even when the soul does not yet know how to read what is happening. This image turns toward that deeper reality. The room is still. The chair remains slightly off-center. The lamp gives only partial illumination. A book rests where a person might have sat moments before. Nothing overt occurs. And yet the scene does not feel vacant. It feels inhabited by significance not yet articulated.
That structure belongs deeply to the lived-world of Confessions to the Empty Chair. The book does not treat silence as a blank interval between meaningful events. It treats silence as one of the places where meaning most forcefully gathers. Again and again, its world reveals that what is not said may exercise more power than what is spoken. A room can preach without words. A withheld answer can shape consciousness more than a lecture. A pause can expose a person more deeply than a confrontation. The soul often discovers that silence is not the opposite of revelation. It is one of revelation’s most difficult modes.
Phenomenologically, silence matters because human beings do not merely live among sounds. They live among atmospheres. An atmosphere is not reducible to a single object or statement. It is the felt structure of a space as encountered by a perceiving self. In this image, the room becomes such an atmosphere. The chair is not merely furniture. The book is not merely an object. The light is not merely illumination. Together they gather into a field of significance. One senses recent presence, withheld speech, lingering thought, unfinished inwardness. None of these are directly pictured as events, yet they are given in the scene as meaningful possibilities. This is one of the key truths of silence: it does not usually communicate by direct statement. It communicates by making a world available in which certain recognitions begin to dawn.
That is why the image avoids ghostliness or melodrama. Silence does not need supernatural effects in order to feel charged. Ordinary stillness is enough. In Confessions to the Empty Chair, some of the most decisive moments occur not when something visually extraordinary intrudes, but when the ordinary ceases to feel neutral. A room becomes morally dense. A chair becomes emblematic. A private stillness becomes a site of exposure. This is because the self does not approach silence as a blank consciousness. It brings memory, fear, longing, guilt, expectation, and spiritual hunger into the quiet. Once there, these interior contents are no longer drowned out by motion and noise. Silence permits what had been concealed by busyness to become audible in another register.
Psychologically, this image touches the discomfort many people feel when external stimulation recedes. Noise often protects us from encounter. Distraction keeps the inward life from cohering too sharply. Constant motion allows the self to postpone interpretation. Silence removes some of those protections. It does not always tell us something new, but it often forces us to hear what had already been there. That is one reason silence can feel oppressive to an unprepared soul and clarifying to a soul ready for truth. The same quiet can be experienced as emptiness, judgment, invitation, or rest, depending on the condition of the one inhabiting it. Silence is not inert. It interacts with the interior life of the hearer. It reveals by resonance.
There is also a theological depth here. In spiritual life, silence is frequently misunderstood in two opposite ways. Some treat it as proof of abandonment, as though the absence of immediate answer meant the absence of meaning. Others romanticize it too quickly, reducing all quiet to serenity or divine consolation. Confessions to the Empty Chair resists both simplifications. It understands that silence can wound, summon, expose, purify, unsettle, and deepen. Divine silence is not identical with emotional emptiness. Existential quiet is not identical with peace. A person may sit in an apparently calm room while undergoing severe inward reckoning. Yet that very reckoning may be the beginning of truer life. Silence does not flatter. It often strips away illusion first.
The empty chair at the center of the image intensifies this insight. A chair implies relation. It suggests a body that might sit, a conversation that might occur, a witness who might remain. Yet here the chair is unoccupied, and its unoccupied state becomes meaningful rather than merely negative. The absent sitter is not the only significance. The greater significance lies in how the scene asks the viewer to reckon with what remains when the expected voice is gone. The book on the chair suggests that words exist, but they are closed. Speech is possible, but not presently delivered. Meaning has not vanished; it has withdrawn into another form. The room becomes a place where silence bears what language has not yet unfolded.
In the broader world of the book, this is one of the recurring disciplines of consciousness: learning to distinguish between emptiness and unannounced significance. Much of life is misread because the soul expects meaning to arrive loudly. It wants revelation to be unmistakable, immediate, and emotionally legible. But many of the most formative truths arrive quietly, through atmosphere, delay, stillness, and the slow pressure of what does not explain itself at once. Silence is therefore not merely the absence of content. It is often the medium in which subtler content becomes possible.
“Silence Was Doing More Than I Knew” names that belated recognition. At first, the quiet may seem uneventful. Later, one realizes that the stillness had been shaping thought, clarifying desire, exposing fear, and preparing understanding all along. The room had not been empty in the way one first supposed. Something was taking place there beneath the threshold of easy narration. That is the burden and gift of silence. It does not always tell us what it is doing while it is doing it. But afterward, if one has learned how to see, one may discover that the deepest work began precisely where nothing seemed to be happening.
Per Wikipedia:
Luigi Pirandello (Italian: 1867 – 1936) was an Italian dramatist, novelist, poet, and short story writer whose greatest contributions were his plays.
He was awarded the 1934 Nobel Prize in Literature "for his bold and ingenious revival of dramatic and scenic art".
Pirandello's works include novels, hundreds of short stories, and about 40 plays, some of which are written in Sicilian. Pirandello's tragic farces are often seen as forerunners of the Theatre of the Absurd.
In the context of playwriting during the early and mid-1900s, Pirandello's impact is notable.
Pirandello inspired playwrights such as Samuel Beckett and Harold Pinter to write plays that echo the themes of existential exploration and metaphysical questioning that he focused on in his works.
His influence goes beyond playwrights; French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre was also inspired by Pirandello's ideas to explore one of the main pillars of his philosophy: 'existentialism'.
The playwright's portrayal of fractured identities and the ambiguity of existence in his plays served as inspiration for Sartre's concepts of freedom, authenticity, and existential angst.
Pirandello's character narratives and metaphysical themes not only aligned with but also enriched Sartre's philosophical discourses, creating a link between existential thought in theater and philosophy, where each medium deepened and reflected upon the complexities and theories of the other.
The dialogues between self and other, freedom and responsibility, authenticity and bad faith, found meaning in the intersection of their respective domains. His legacy pushes further reflection into the complexities of characters, human consciousness, and identity.
IMG_9201
The Concord Bridge .. the view the British saw, bridge reconstructed. They had to cross it for another try to secure or seize the militias armory .. the Minutemen Armory & Arsenal
49er Crew, Spring 2016
Existentialism in Paris
We may not be wearing 49er gear because it was a lot colder in Paris than any of us expected but our professor, Dr. McReynolds in the sunglasses, snapped this one of all of us as proud Charlotte 49ers! GO NINERS!
"Huis Clos" Play Rehearsal In Progress. Follow us www.mesmeriseme.co.uk/what-is-hell, twitter.com/#!/HuisClos_2011, www.facebook.com/pages/Huis-Clos-MesmeriseMe-2011/1212970...
We often speak of time as though it were a healer, as though its primary work were to soften pain, close wounds, and carry the soul gently past what once troubled it. But lived experience is often less merciful and more exact than that. Time does not always remove. Sometimes it uncovers. Sometimes it strips away the urgency, vanity, confusion, and defensive noise that once kept us from seeing what had been present from the beginning. This image turns toward that harsher and more clarifying truth. The room is familiar. Nothing dramatic has happened to it. Its furniture remains. Its structure persists. Yet the atmosphere has changed because the one who stands within it has changed. He is not revisiting a transformed world. He is standing inside an old world with newly ripened sight.
That distinction belongs deeply to the lived-world of Confessions to the Empty Chair. The book repeatedly returns to the fact that experience is rarely understood while it is being lived. The soul moves through scenes, attachments, injuries, desires, silences, and confusions without possessing a complete interpretation of them in the moment. Later, after time has done its austere work, the same events reappear under different light. What once felt ordinary becomes charged. What once felt merely painful becomes intelligible. What once seemed innocent reveals its concealed structure. What once seemed incomprehensible begins to disclose its moral and psychological logic. In that sense, time is not a magic solvent. It is an agent of disclosure.
Phenomenologically, this means that the past is never simply stored and retrieved as a fixed sequence of finished objects. The past returns through the present self. It is seen through the accumulated formation of the one remembering. That does not mean truth becomes arbitrary. It means truth often becomes available retrospectively, after the self has acquired the depth required to recognize it. A room from earlier life is never only a room. It is a field of prior perception. To stand within it again is to encounter the difference between what one saw then and what one can see now. The image preserves precisely that interval. The man does not dramatize revelation. He stands still, as though the real event is not outward but perceptual: the dawning recognition that the scene had always contained more than he once allowed it to mean.
This is why the aging of the room matters. Worn edges, softened surfaces, and dust suspended in the fading light do more than provide atmosphere. They testify to endurance. Time has not erased the world. It has marked it. Those marks become interpretable only when the observer has also been marked. In the book’s broader vision, this is one of the central burdens of consciousness: life cannot be grasped all at once. One must live before one can read what one has lived. By the time meaning arrives, the event itself may already be over. Yet that delay does not invalidate truth. It is often the condition under which truth becomes bearable.
Psychologically, the image addresses the painful difference between immediacy and comprehension. During an event, the self is busy surviving, desiring, reacting, defending, or misreading. It does not stand outside itself with ideal objectivity. It is immersed. Only later, after emotional intensity has settled and older self-protections have weakened, can a person begin to perceive what was actually occurring. He sees patterns he once mistook for accidents. He recognizes motives he had disguised from himself. He understands that certain absences, tensions, and distortions were not new developments but longstanding realities he lacked the capacity to name. Time, then, becomes revelatory not because it invents meaning, but because it removes the conditions that once obscured it.
There is also a theological seriousness to this image. In Confessions to the Empty Chair, truth is not always delivered as immediate certainty. It often emerges through delayed recognition, through the humbling experience of realizing that the soul was less perceptive than it believed. This humility matters. It breaks the illusion that we are transparent to ourselves in real time. It suggests that the self requires purification not only of behavior, but of sight. One must become the kind of person who can endure what reality shows. That process takes time because conversion of vision is rarely instantaneous. The heart has to be stripped of certain attachments before it can perceive clearly. The ego has to lose some of its privileges before the world can appear in its more truthful proportions.
This is what makes the title so precise. “Time Revealed What Was Already There” refuses the comforting fiction that reality changed into something newly meaningful. Instead, it confesses that the deeper change occurred in the observer. The world had long been saying something. The room had long contained its own testimony. The difficulty lay in the soul’s unreadiness to hear it. Time did not place truth into the scene. It made the self answerable to truth already present in the scene.
That insight runs through the book as a whole. Human beings do not merely suffer events; they outlive them into understanding. They do not simply remember; they re-encounter what memory could not originally hold. They do not merely age; they come under the judgment of meanings that arrive late but arrive with force. The delay can feel cruel because it reveals how long one lived without seeing. Yet it can also be merciful, because not all truth can be received at once. Some recognitions require distance. Some require loss. Some require the slow erosion of illusions.
In the end, this image is not about nostalgia. It is about belated clarity. It is about the moment when a person realizes that the past was never as mute as he thought. Time has not healed him by making the scene disappear. It has done something more demanding. It has returned him to the scene with eyes capable of reading what had been written there all along.
Het regent niet. Het valt. Een mens knielt in de modder, niet om te bidden maar om te blijven. Haar kleren zijn zwaar, haar handen vuil, haar gezicht omhoog. Alsof het antwoord daar hangt. De wereld is grijs en geeft niets terug. De regen wast niets schoon. Hij herhaalt alleen. Dit lichaam houdt stand zonder heldendom. Er is geen troost, wel adem. De foto zwijgt hard. Ze zegt: dit is wat overblijft wanneer hoop geen richting meer heeft. Toch is er beweging. Water stroomt. Tijd gaat verder. Dat is genoeg. Voor wie kijkt blijft alleen natte stilte en een lichaam.