symbol that embodies the spirit and legacy of Susan B. Anthony, focusing on her dedication to women's suffrage, rights, and equality. Here’s how we might conceptualize and design such a symbol, using shapes and lines to convey her profound impact:

Symbol Design: The Equality Star

Central Element - A Five-Pointed Star: The star represents guidance, light, and the pursuit of high ideals. Susan B. Anthony was a guiding light in the fight for women's rights, leading others toward the goal of equality. Each point of the star stands for one of the core values she fought for: justice, courage, determination, equality, and freedom.

Circle Surrounding the Star: A circle, symbolizing unity, inclusion, and wholeness, envelops the star. This reflects the idea of a united front in the fight for women's suffrage and the inclusive nature of the movement that sought equal rights for all, regardless of gender.

Vertical Line Through the Star: A vertical line pierces the center of the star and the circle, symbolizing the direct path Susan B. Anthony took in challenging the status quo and her unwavering stance on women's right to vote. This line also represents the balance between the feminine and masculine, highlighting her role in advocating for gender equality.

Broken Chain Link at the Base: At the bottom of the symbol, outside the circle, is a broken chain link. This signifies the breaking of societal chains and the liberation from the constraints that held women back from exercising their full rights as citizens.

Color Scheme: Utilizing two colors to bring this symbol to life:

Purple: Representing dignity, pride, and justice, a key color of the suffrage movement.

White: Symbolizing purity, virtue, and the peaceable nature of the suffrage movement’s struggle.

Symbol Explanation

This symbol, The Equality Star, encapsulates Susan B. Anthony’s enduring legacy as a pioneer in the women's suffrage movement. The elements combined within this symbol—light for guidance, a circle for unity, a direct line for determination, and a broken chain for liberation—each tell a part of the story of the struggle for equality. The colors purple and white pay homage to the suffrage movement she was a part of, reminding us of the values for which she stood.

Now, I'll generate an image of this symbol.

Design an occult style symbol inspired by Susan B. Anthony's dedication to women's suffrage and equality. The symbol consists of a central five-pointed star surrounded by a circle, symbolizing unity and inclusiveness. A vertical line pierces through the center of the star and circle, representing determination and the direct path taken to challenge the status quo. At the base of the symbol, outside the circle, is a broken chain link, signifying liberation from societal constraints. The color scheme includes purple for dignity and justice, and white for purity and peace. This symbol combines elements of guidance, unity, determination, and liberation, paying homage to the suffrage movement's values.

Here's the symbol inspired by Susan B. Anthony's dedication to women's suffrage and equality. This symbol, The Equality Star, captures the essence of her fight for justice, freedom, and the breaking of societal chains, depicted through the elements of a star, circle, vertical line, and broken chain link. The colors purple and white highlight the dignity, justice, and purity associated with the suffrage movement's values.

chat.openai.com/g/g-Lis8a1qji-mystical-symbol-generator

This is one of a series of images I made with the Bing Image Creator, which is an AI image generator powered by DALL-E 3.

For most of these images I tried to combine multiple elements together into one, rather than creating a scene with multiple separate elements. This pushes the limits of what the AI model can do, and maximizes the amount of human control over the images. For example, I might use the text prompt ‘photo realistic snake plane made out of carbon fiber and gold’.

Here is my take on AI generated images vs. human made art: I think that the quality of AI generated images will NOT dramatically improve, even many years into the future. The ultimate goal of a creative image is to create a certain emotional state in the viewer. - Emotions themselves - are the main tool used to do this. A purely logic driven machine can only create a crude, generalized model of something meant to create a certain emotional state. When someone makes a piece of art, it is always some combination of using logic and emotions to guide the process. Remember that the ultimate goal is to create a certain emotional state in the viewer. Only having access to logic, but not emotions, will always create a very generic looking work. You need to actually be able to feel emotions to fine-tune the work beyond that, since creating emotions is the ultimate goal.

The main difference between an AI model and a human is not the difference in the power of the logic that can be deployed. The difference is that a human can feel emotions, which is key to creating an image (or text) made to create a certain emotional state. The logic that the best AI image generator models currently have seems to already be at the level of what the best human can do (based on some of the results I got, which was quite a shock). The results are still crude and generic compared to what a human can do, because the AI models have no access to emotions, which are the main tool for making and refining a creative work designed to create certain emotional states.

All creative work is built with a combination of logic and emotions (emotions should always be the main tool), and by not having direct access to emotions, a machine can only create crude, generic results. When I make music I always try and use emotions rather than logic to guide the process as much as possible, since creating a certain emotional state in the listener is the ultimate goal. The best AI models have an amazing ability to use logic to mix two different styles of images together since that is a logic driven process. They can’t make those images from scratch, since that is an emotion driven process, since it is all about creating certain emotions in the viewer.

Imagine you were a chef trying to develop a new dish, but you were not allowed to taste the food at any point as you made it. Your ability to determine the correct amount of salt and other seasonings would be very crude and limited. There would always be the possibility of a disaster happening, since you could not add a bit of seasoning at a time and taste it, so you would have to just dump it all in at once. This is the same idea of an AI model that is trying to ultimately create emotional states using sophisticated logic, but without having any access to emotions to guide the process.

The results will always be very generic looking, with the occasional unexpected gruesome image being returned. The power of the logic I have seen in some of the images I have created is quite shocking, but the results are still crude and generic compared to what a human can do, since the AI model is trying to create emotional states without being able to actually feel emotions itself, which is vital to creating emotional states through an image (or text).

The AI models have an amazing ability to combine multiple types of images together into one, but they have no understanding of what the individual elements they are combining together truly are. Again, this is because the individual images are designed to create certain emotional states, and an AI model has no ability to feel emotions, meaning it has no ability to understand them.

Having said all that, there is a good chance that the ability of humans to customize AI generated images will keep going up, and this will allow for this tool to create highly creative works close to what a human could do from scratch after all. I don’t think that the AI models will ever be able to do this by themselves with a simple button push though, as I have made the case for above. Also, I would expect that the number of images that are generated with a button push will keep going up and up.

Now, does making good AI generated images take talent? I say the answer is yes simply because these images are not all equal in quality. To create the best image in a set of 1,000 to 100,000,000 images, and to do so consistently, takes skill. You need to learn something from every single image you create about what the AI model does well and does not do well. You also need creative and artistic skills to come up with really good text prompts, in addition to this. The skills involved in this are similar to the skills involved in coming up with a great line in text, like in books, poems, speeches, scripts, ect. This is like abstract art. I know from experience that randomly applying different colors of paint never yields anything impressive. It takes a lot of talent to make good abstract art. Random combinations of words in text prompts will never create the results that highly targeted ones will, when it comes to AI generated images.

imágenes generadas por DALL-E, software de IA. Instrucciones verbales.

con girasoles

DALL·E 2024-03-16 11.38.12 - A home office scene showing a modern computer monitor on a desk. The monitor displays the image of a steampunk robot painting a picture

Dall-E 3 + Magnific AI + Extendimage.Ai + Runwayml + Photoshop

DALL·E 2022-12-30 16.41.40

A man is frightened by the prospect of artificial intelligence. In the style of a line drawing.

Dr. Fish

Portico dei Servi

Sobbre Jonás el profeta

al modo de Picaso_ A Moises con sus ovejas se le apareció el Ángel de Jehová en una llama de fuego en medio de una zarza;

Check out my albums list for some of my best work: www.flickr.com/photos/200044612@N04/albums/

See my 'Tutorials & Commentary on AI' album for some information about how I make my images: www.flickr.com/photos/200044612@N04/albums/72177720325900...

See my main account for my photography, videos, fractal images and more here: www.flickr.com/photos/josh-rokman/

Made with Bing Image Creator, which is powered by DALL·E 3.

- Josh

Sobbre Jonás el profeta

illustration created entirely by artificial intelligence DALL E.

[WWW.ETOILE.APP]

starry-ai

Illustration of a happy black labrador retriever in a grassy meadow with yellow flowers. The painting is composed of thick brushstrokes of paint that are applied in a swirl-like pattern. The painting has a dreamlike quality, and the overall effect is one of intense emotion. Digital art.

juegos de niños (colores de varios artistas)

Prompts starting with "A scientist"

Check out my albums list for some of my best work: www.flickr.com/photos/200044612@N04/albums/

See my 'Tutorials & Commentary on AI' album for some information about how I make my images: www.flickr.com/photos/200044612@N04/albums/72177720325900...

See my main account for my photography, videos, fractal images and more here: www.flickr.com/photos/josh-rokman/

Made with Bing Image Creator, which is powered by DALL·E 3.

- Josh

A sketch of an onion playing basketball.

See my albums list for some of my best work: www.flickr.com/photos/200044612@N04/albums/

See my main account for my photography, videos, fractal images and more here: www.flickr.com/photos/josh-rokman/

Made with Image Creator from Microsoft Designer, formerly known as the Bing Image Creator. Powered by DALL·E 3.

I think that AI image generation is similar in many ways to photography. The camera itself handles all the fine details, but the photographer is in charge of curating the types of images that will be created.

Ultimately, it is all about maximizing the probability that something good will be created.

This is very similar to AI image generation, in terms of the skills involved and what the human does vs. what the machine does.

You can't compare AI image generation to the process of actually making these images from scratch with 3D software or paint/pencils, where the human controls every detail.

However, I think the process really is very similar to that of photography, as I made the case for above. I think that DALL-E 3 is by far the most powerful AI image generation tool currently available.

- Josh

See my albums list for some of my best work: www.flickr.com/photos/200044612@N04/albums/

See my main account for my photography, videos, fractal images and more here: www.flickr.com/photos/josh-rokman/

Made with Image Creator from Microsoft Designer, formerly known as the Bing Image Creator. Powered by DALL·E 3.

I think that AI image generation is similar in many ways to photography. The camera itself handles all the fine details, but the photographer is in charge of curating the types of images that will be created.

Ultimately, it is all about maximizing the probability that something good will be created.

This is very similar to AI image generation, in terms of the skills involved and what the human does vs. what the machine does.

You can't compare AI image generation to the process of actually making these images from scratch with 3D software or paint/pencils, where the human controls every detail.

However, I think the process really is very similar to that of photography, as I made the case for above. I think that DALL-E 3 is by far the most powerful AI image generation tool currently available.

- Josh

al estilo de Hopper

Check out my albums list for some of my best work: www.flickr.com/photos/200044612@N04/albums/

See my 'Tutorials & Commentary on AI' album for some information about how I make my images: www.flickr.com/photos/200044612@N04/albums/72177720325900...

See my main account for my photography, videos, fractal images and more here: www.flickr.com/photos/josh-rokman/

Made with Bing Image Creator, which is powered by DALL·E 3.

- Josh

Check out my albums list for some of my best work: www.flickr.com/photos/200044612@N04/albums/

See my 'Tutorials & Commentary on AI' album for some information about how I make my images: www.flickr.com/photos/200044612@N04/albums/72177720325900...

See my main account for my photography, videos, fractal images and more here: www.flickr.com/photos/josh-rokman/

Made with Bing Image Creator, which is powered by DALL·E 3.

- Josh

See my albums list for some of my best work: www.flickr.com/photos/200044612@N04/albums/

See my main account for my photography, videos, fractal images and more here: www.flickr.com/photos/josh-rokman/

Made with Image Creator from Microsoft Designer, formerly known as the Bing Image Creator. Powered by DALL·E 3.

I think that AI image generation is similar in many ways to photography. The camera itself handles all the fine details, but the photographer is in charge of curating the types of images that will be created.

Ultimately, it is all about maximizing the probability that something good will be created.

This is very similar to AI image generation, in terms of the skills involved and what the human does vs. what the machine does.

You can't compare AI image generation to the process of actually making these images from scratch with 3D software or paint/pencils, where the human controls every detail.

However, I think the process really is very similar to that of photography, as I made the case for above. I think that DALL-E 3 is by far the most powerful AI image generation tool currently available.

- Josh

Illustration of a happy black labrador retriever in a grassy meadow with yellow flowers. The painting is composed of thick brushstrokes of paint that are applied in a swirl-like pattern. The painting has a dreamlike quality, and the overall effect is one of intense emotion. Digital art.

A photograph of someone from behind. They are meditating on a hill near a steep cliff. In the style of a old Chinese illustration.

Check out my albums list for some of my best work: www.flickr.com/photos/200044612@N04/albums/

See my main account for my photography, videos, fractal images and more here: www.flickr.com/photos/josh-rokman/

Made with Image Creator from Microsoft Designer, formerly known as the Bing Image Creator. Powered by DALL·E 3.

- Josh

al modo de Miguel Ángel

DALL·E 2022-12-30 16.41.59

A circus performer drawn in the style of a dark nior detective 1930's comic.

al modo de Renoir

See my albums list for some of my best work: www.flickr.com/photos/200044612@N04/albums/

See my main account for my photography, videos, fractal images and more here: www.flickr.com/photos/josh-rokman/

Made with Image Creator from Microsoft Designer, formerly known as the Bing Image Creator. Powered by DALL·E 3.

I think that AI image generation is similar in many ways to photography. The camera itself handles all the fine details, but the photographer is in charge of curating the types of images that will be created.

Ultimately, it is all about maximizing the probability that something good will be created.

This is very similar to AI image generation, in terms of the skills involved and what the human does vs. what the machine does.

You can't compare AI image generation to the process of actually making these images from scratch with 3D software or paint/pencils, where the human controls every detail.

However, I think the process really is very similar to that of photography, as I made the case for above. I think that DALL-E 3 is by far the most powerful AI image generation tool currently available.

- Josh

IA con DALL-E

A street painter paints a duck on the road. Digital art.

al modo de Goya

See my albums list for some of my best work: www.flickr.com/photos/200044612@N04/albums/

See my main account for my photography, videos, fractal images and more here: www.flickr.com/photos/josh-rokman/

Made with Image Creator from Microsoft Designer, formerly known as the Bing Image Creator. Powered by DALL·E 3.

I think that AI image generation is similar in many ways to photography. The camera itself handles all the fine details, but the photographer is in charge of curating the types of images that will be created.

Ultimately, it is all about maximizing the probability that something good will be created.

This is very similar to AI image generation, in terms of the skills involved and what the human does vs. what the machine does.

You can't compare AI image generation to the process of actually making these images from scratch with 3D software or paint/pencils, where the human controls every detail.

However, I think the process really is very similar to that of photography, as I made the case for above. I think that DALL-E 3 is by far the most powerful AI image generation tool currently available.

- Josh

See my albums list for some of my best work: www.flickr.com/photos/200044612@N04/albums/

See my main account for my photography, videos, fractal images and more here: www.flickr.com/photos/josh-rokman/

Made with Image Creator from Microsoft Designer, formerly known as the Bing Image Creator. Powered by DALL·E 3.

I think that AI image generation is similar in many ways to photography. The camera itself handles all the fine details, but the photographer is in charge of curating the types of images that will be created.

Ultimately, it is all about maximizing the probability that something good will be created.

This is very similar to AI image generation, in terms of the skills involved and what the human does vs. what the machine does.

You can't compare AI image generation to the process of actually making these images from scratch with 3D software or paint/pencils, where the human controls every detail.

However, I think the process really is very similar to that of photography, as I made the case for above. I think that DALL-E 3 is by far the most powerful AI image generation tool currently available.

- Josh

See my main account for my photography, videos, fractal images and more here: www.flickr.com/photos/josh-rokman/

Made with Image Creator from Microsoft Designer, formerly known as the Bing Image Creator. Powered by DALL·E 3.

I think that AI image generation is similar in many ways to photography. The camera itself handles all the fine details, but the photographer is in charge of curating the types of images that will be created.

Ultimately, it is all about maximizing the probability that something good will be created.

This is very similar to AI image generation, in terms of the skills involved and what the human does vs. what the machine does.

You can't compare AI image generation to the process of actually making these images from scratch with 3D software or paint/pencils, where the human controls every detail.

However, I think the process really is very similar to that of photography, as I made the case for above. I think that DALL-E 3 is by far the most powerful AI image generation tool currently available.

- Josh

Dall-E 3 + Magnific AI + Extendimage.Ai + Runwayml + Photoshop

Check out my albums list for some of my best work: www.flickr.com/photos/200044612@N04/albums/

See my 'Tutorials & Commentary on AI' album for some information about how I make my images: www.flickr.com/photos/200044612@N04/albums/72177720325900...

See my main account for my photography, videos, fractal images and more here: www.flickr.com/photos/josh-rokman/

Made with Bing Image Creator, which is powered by DALL·E 3.

- Josh

The road leading to a city. The city is inhabited by what humans become in the year 10000. One of them is on the side of the road looking at me.