View allAll Photos Tagged conserver

Founded in 1906, Mesa Verde National Park was created to conserve and protect the Ancestral Puebloan archaeological sites and cliff dwellings within the present-day park on the sides and top of a large tree-covered cuesta, known as Mesa Verde, that rises approximately 1,500 feet (785 meters) above the surrounding canyons and valleys, with rugged canyons cutting through the cuesta, lined with sandstone cliffs and ledges.

 

The area was inhabited by indigenous people for thousands of years prior to the rise of the Ancestral Puebloan culture, whom developed villages and farmsteads within what is today Mesa Verde National Park beginning around the year 750, with the structures built by the Ancestral Puebloans growing in complexity and durability, especially due to contact with the nearby culture centered around Chaco Canyon. The famous cliff dwellings for which the area is famous, however, were built between approximately 1020 and 1260, especially after a major drought in the region between 1130 and 1180, which led to a major migration of people from Chaco Canyon to Mesa Verde. The people of Chaco Canyon brought their culture, construction techniques, and goods with them, which is evident at archaeological sites on the cuesta.

 

The area began to depopulate between 1260 and 1285 due to environmental conditions becoming less favorable, with the people of Mesa Verde moving to the lowlands of what is today New Mexico and Arizona, with many founding or joining Pueblo settlements in these regions that still exist today. The stone houses were left to the elements, and were left uninhabited, only remembered by the descendants of the Ancestral Puebloans and the other indigenous groups who called the area home, most notably the Utes.

 

The ancient ruins were discovered by European-Americans in 1873, and were documented between 1875 and 1888, with various cliff dwellings and archaeological sites being relatively well-preserved and recognizable to explorers, archaeologists, and scientists whom visited the modern-day park. However, the removal of artifacts from the cuesta became a major concern, and efforts began in 1889 to protect the area as a National Park.

 

The park covers an area of 82 square miles (212 square kilometers), and features multiple Ancestral Puebloan and other indigenous archaeological sites, and was taken from the Ute people, with land being taken from the Utes after the establishment of the park to expand its borders. The park long struggled with proper interpretation and inclusion of the voices of the Puebloan people, whose ancestors built the ancient dwellings and lived at what are today archaeological sites, with work presently ongoing to redress these issues.

 

The ruins at the park underwent reconstitution and stabilization between 1908 and 1922, with extensive work being done on Spruce Tree House, Cliff Palace, and Sun Temple. Further work was carried out by the New Deal-era Civilian Conservation Corps starting in 1932 and extending through World War II, which included the construction of various park facilities for visitors and staff, and constructing roads atop the cuesta. The Wetherill Mesa ruins, meanwhile, were stabilized with work being carried out between 1958 and 1965, coinciding with the construction of the Far View accommodations atop the cuesta to the east.

 

The park today features a modern entrance road from US Highway 160, which climbs up the rugged slopes at the north end of the park to the top of the cuesta, stretching across the top of the cuesta to the south, where it connects to various roads that allow visitors to access the overlooks and trails for various cliff dwellings and archaeological sites on Chapin Mesa and Wetherill Mesa. Two areas of tourist accommodation also exist at Far View in the northern section of the park, and the administrative district at Spruce Tree Point at the southern end of the park.

 

The park was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1966, and was designated a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1978. Today, the park sees over half a million visitors annually, and continues to preserve and maintain the ancient structures built by the Ancestral Puebloans.

Session 3: Community-conserved areas in the future management of biodiversity, land and water in the Mediterranean

Session 3: La conservation communautaire des espaces dans la gestion future de la biodiversité, du sol et de l’eau dans la région méditerranéenne

Ulcinj (Montenegro) - 28 October 2016

1st Mediterranean Plant Conservation Week “Building a regional network to conserve plants and cultural diversity”

1re Semaine de la conservation des plantes méditerranéennes “Construction d’un réseau régional pour la conservation de la diversité culturelle et végétale”

Photo by Pilar Valbuena for The IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation.

More information on 1st Mediterranean Plant Conservation Week, please visit:

www.medplantsweek.uicnmed.org/

If you use one of our photos, please credit it accordingly and let us know. You can reach us through our Flickr account or at: lourdes.lazaro@iucn.org

Handling bees conserved in alkohol according to combined techniques according to Droege & Walls:

 

Here are links to online descriptions by Allan Walls and Sam Droege on washing bees, drying them, and re-moisturizing them in a wet chamber. A combination of these methods is used by myself for the preparation of specimens preserved in alcohol:

 

Credit and links:

Allan Walls:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdapM3jRFCw&t=372s

 

Sam Droege:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2y-ind12Cc&t=310s

 

----------

 

Protocol for Handling Collected Bees and Preparation

Introduction:

For taxonomic reasons and species conservation, it is often necessary to sacrifice a limited number of specimens from a population, similar to an ecological biopsy.

 

Bees are not as easily prepared as many other insects for proper identification.

Why?

Bees (Apoidea: Anthophila) are "vegetarian wasps" with voluminous scopae and hair structures for pollen collection. On the other hand, Crabronid wasps (e.g., digger wasps), the sister group of Apiformes, do not have such branched hairs. Bees, with their fluffy hairs, are therefore difficult to prepare so that the hairs are useful for diagnostic identification. Keeping specimens in alcohol and subsequent preparation with a needle usually results in damaging the fluffiness of the hairs. Thus, the fluffiness of bee hairs needs to be technically preserved for taxonomic collections and macro photography. This is not a trivial task and is technically more difficult than, for example, preparing wasps, beetles, or other insects. Here, two methods (A) and (B) for "hairstyling" bees for diagnostic purposes and photography are used:

 

(A)

After catching a bee alive, it is easiest to kill the insect in a killing jar with a small ball of toilet paper tissue soaked with a little amount of ethyl acetate. Preparation of the bee should be within a few days, while the insect is still relaxed. The advantage of this procedure is that the specimen retains its hair color and fluffiness. However, the disadvantage is that ethyl acetate is not well compatible with good DNA and RNA preservation for subsequent barcoding purposes. Alcohol preservation is preferred whenever specimens need to be kept for longer than a few days.

 

(B) The alternative protocol is more elaborate but preserves DNA well:

 

1. For scientific purposes, preserve a living bee in 90% EtOH, e.g., in a Falcon tube.

2. Remove the field label from the vial and save it.

3. Pour off the EtOH and specimen into a small dish.

4. Transfer the specimen with soft forceps into a Falcon tube containing hot soapy water detergent.

5. Shake and wash for at least one minute.

6. Pour the liquid and bee into a small kitchen sieve and rinse with hot tap water.

7. Transfer the specimen into a special drying glass with a net cover. The bottom of the glass contains toilet paper for absorbing fluid. Dry with a hairdryer until the hairs are fluffy.

8. Transfer the specimen into a moist two-chamber box (e.g., Sistema). Allan Walls uses a small Sistema box produced in New Zealand. The lower compartment contains toilet tissue dampened with soapy water to prevent mold. The upper, perforated container (with ~6mm drilled holes) carries the specimen.

9. Place the container into an incubator at ~50°C (I use a honey bucket warming cabinet).

10. Condensation may form on the cover of the moisture chamber. Avoid dripping it onto the specimen the next day. Remove the box carefully.

11. Place the specimen on paper secured with needles on a styrofoam pad. Pin the specimen with an insect needle or a minutia needle. Arrange legs, antennae, and wings with fixing pins.

12. Leave for at least three days to dry (depending on the size of the insect). Identify the species using taxonomic literature, DNA analysis, and AI-driven identification platforms such as iNaturalist, ObsIdentify, or others.

 

For macrophotography, use an ultrasound bath at some stage to remove dust particles.

For macrophotography, contact, e.g., Thorben Danke:

sagaoptics.de/technik/

 

------------ Deutscher Text / German text translation -------------

 

Sistema-Rehydrationskammer

 

Nach Droege & Walls:

 

Hier sind Links zu Online-Beschreibungen von Allan Walls und Sam Droege über das Waschen von Bienen, das Trocknen und das Wiederbefeuchten in einer Feuchtkammer. Eine Kombination dieser Methoden verwende ich zur Präparation von in Alkohol konservierten Exemplaren:

 

Credits und Links:

Allan Walls:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdapM3jRFCw&t=372s

 

Sam Droege:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2y-ind12Cc&t=310s

 

----------

 

Protokoll zur Handhabung gesammelter Bienen und Präparation

Einführung:

Aus taxonomischen Gründen und zum Artenschutz ist es oft notwendig, eine begrenzte Anzahl von Exemplaren aus einer Population zu entnehmen, ähnlich einer ökologischen Biopsie.

 

Bienen sind nicht so einfach zu präparieren wie viele andere Insekten zur korrekten Identifizierung.

Warum?

Bienen (Apoidea: Anthophila) sind "vegetarische Wespen" mit voluminösen Scopae und Haarstrukturen zur Pollensammlung. Andererseits haben Crabronid-Wespen (z.B. Grabwespen), die Schwestergruppe der Apiformes, keine solchen verzweigten Haare. Bienen mit ihren flauschigen Haaren sind daher schwer so zu präparieren, dass die Haare für diagnostische Identifizierungen nützlich sind. Das Aufbewahren von Exemplaren in Alkohol und die anschließende Präparation mit einer Nadel führt in der Regel dazu, dass die Flauschigkeit der Haare beschädigt wird. Daher muss die Flauschigkeit der Bienenhaare technisch erhalten werden, sowohl für taxonomische Sammlungen als auch für die Makrofotografie. Dies ist keine triviale Aufgabe und technisch schwieriger als zum Beispiel die Präparation von Wespen, Käfern oder anderen Insekten. Hier werden zwei Methoden (A) und (B) zur "Frisierung" von Bienen für diagnostische Zwecke und Fotografie verwendet:

 

(A)

Nach dem Fang einer lebenden Biene ist es am einfachsten, das Insekt in einem Tötungsgefäß mit einem kleinen Ballen Toilettenpapier, der mit etwas Ethylacetat getränkt ist, zu töten. Die Präparation der Biene sollte innerhalb weniger Tage erfolgen, während das Insekt noch entspannt ist. Der Vorteil dieses Verfahrens besteht darin, dass das Exemplar seine Haarfarbe und Flauschigkeit behält. Der Nachteil ist jedoch, dass Ethylacetat nicht gut mit der Erhaltung von DNA und RNA für nachfolgende Barcoding-Zwecke kompatibel ist. Alkoholkonservierung wird bevorzugt, wann immer Exemplare länger als ein paar Tage aufbewahrt werden müssen.

 

(B) Das alternative Protokoll ist aufwendiger, bewahrt jedoch die DNA gut:

 

1. Zu wissenschaftlichen Zwecken wird eine lebende Biene in 90% EtOH konserviert, z.B. in einem Falcon-Röhrchen.

2. Entfernung der Feldetikett vom Röhrchen und Aufbewahrung.

3. Abgießen des EtOH und des Exemplares in eine kleine Schale.

4. Überführung des Exemplares mit weichen Pinzetten in ein Falcon-Röhrchen, das heißes Seifenwasser enthält.

5. Schütteln und waschen mindestens eine Minute lang.

6. Flüssigkeit und Biene in ein kleines Küchensieb gießen und anschließend mit heißem Leitungswasser spülen.

7. Überführen des Exemplares in ein spezielles Trocknungsglas mit einem Netzdeckel. Der Boden des Glases enthält Toilettenpapier zum Aufsaugen von Flüssigkeit. Trocknen mit einem Föhn-Haartrockner, bis die Haare flauschig sind.

8. Überführen des Exemplares in eine feuchte Zweikammerbox (z.B. sistema). Allan Walls verwendet eine kleine Sistema-Box, die in Neuseeland hergestellt wird. Das untere Fach enthält mit Seifenwasser angefeuchtetes Toilettenpapier, um Schimmel zu verhindern. Der obere, perforierte (mit Bohrer erzeugte ~6mm Löcher) Behälter trägt das Exemplar.

9. Pllatzieren des Behälters in einen Inkubator bei ~50°C. (Ich benutze einen Honig-Eimer Wärmeschrank).

10. Am Deckel der Feuchtigkeitskammer kann sich Kondenswasser bilden. Man vermeide, dass am nächsten Tag Wasser auf das Exemplar tropft. Entfernen Sie die Box vorsichtig.

11. Platzieren Sie das Exemplar auf Papier, das mit Nadeln auf einem Styropor-Pad befestigt ist. Nadeln des Exemplares mit einer Insektennadel oder einer Minutiennadel. Ordnen der Beine, Antennen und Flügel mit Fixiernadeln.

12. Mindestens drei Tage trocknen lassen (abhängig von der Größe des Insektes). Identifizieren Sie die Art mit Hilfe taxonomischer Literatur, DNA Analysen und KI-gesteuerten Identifikationsplattformen wie iNaturalist, ObsIdentify oder anderen.

 

Für die Makrofotografie wird in einigen Phasen ein Ultraschallbad verwendet, um Staubpartikel zu entfernen.

Für Macrophotografie kontaktiere z.B. Thorben Danke:

sagaoptics.de/technik/

Session 3: Community-conserved areas in the future management of biodiversity, land and water in the Mediterranean

Session 3: La conservation communautaire des espaces dans la gestion future de la biodiversité, du sol et de l’eau dans la région méditerranéenne

Ulcinj (Montenegro) - 28 October 2016

1st Mediterranean Plant Conservation Week “Building a regional network to conserve plants and cultural diversity”

1re Semaine de la conservation des plantes méditerranéennes “Construction d’un réseau régional pour la conservation de la diversité culturelle et végétale”

Photo by Pilar Valbuena for The IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation.

More information on 1st Mediterranean Plant Conservation Week, please visit:

www.medplantsweek.uicnmed.org/

If you use one of our photos, please credit it accordingly and let us know. You can reach us through our Flickr account or at: lourdes.lazaro@iucn.org

Making fig and ginger conserve

Surjen provides breast-conserving surgery in Nigeria that aims to remove breast cancer while avoiding a mastectomy. Some of the women want the removal of cancer while leaving most of the breast part as possible. While removing cancer some of the tissues of surround will also be removed because of the risk of reappearing of cancer. Surjen provides best hospitals for breast cancer surgeryin Nigeria. If someone wants to keep most of the breast, it will require a radiation procedure. We provide the best assistance from the experienced doctors & surgeons that can tell you about your full treatments and breast surgery cost in Nigeria.

For more info:

Visit us: www.surjen.com/surgery-detail/breast-conserving-surgery-l...

From The Australian Women's Weekly 10 September 1958. From my collection.

Founded in 1906, Mesa Verde National Park was created to conserve and protect the Ancestral Puebloan archaeological sites and cliff dwellings within the present-day park on the sides and top of a large tree-covered cuesta, known as Mesa Verde, that rises approximately 1,500 feet (785 meters) above the surrounding canyons and valleys, with rugged canyons cutting through the cuesta, lined with sandstone cliffs and ledges.

 

The area was inhabited by indigenous people for thousands of years prior to the rise of the Ancestral Puebloan culture, whom developed villages and farmsteads within what is today Mesa Verde National Park beginning around the year 750, with the structures built by the Ancestral Puebloans growing in complexity and durability, especially due to contact with the nearby culture centered around Chaco Canyon. The famous cliff dwellings for which the area is famous, however, were built between approximately 1020 and 1260, especially after a major drought in the region between 1130 and 1180, which led to a major migration of people from Chaco Canyon to Mesa Verde. The people of Chaco Canyon brought their culture, construction techniques, and goods with them, which is evident at archaeological sites on the cuesta.

 

The area began to depopulate between 1260 and 1285 due to environmental conditions becoming less favorable, with the people of Mesa Verde moving to the lowlands of what is today New Mexico and Arizona, with many founding or joining Pueblo settlements in these regions that still exist today. The stone houses were left to the elements, and were left uninhabited, only remembered by the descendants of the Ancestral Puebloans and the other indigenous groups who called the area home, most notably the Utes.

 

The ancient ruins were discovered by European-Americans in 1873, and were documented between 1875 and 1888, with various cliff dwellings and archaeological sites being relatively well-preserved and recognizable to explorers, archaeologists, and scientists whom visited the modern-day park. However, the removal of artifacts from the cuesta became a major concern, and efforts began in 1889 to protect the area as a National Park.

 

The park covers an area of 82 square miles (212 square kilometers), and features multiple Ancestral Puebloan and other indigenous archaeological sites, and was taken from the Ute people, with land being taken from the Utes after the establishment of the park to expand its borders. The park long struggled with proper interpretation and inclusion of the voices of the Puebloan people, whose ancestors built the ancient dwellings and lived at what are today archaeological sites, with work presently ongoing to redress these issues.

 

The ruins at the park underwent reconstitution and stabilization between 1908 and 1922, with extensive work being done on Spruce Tree House, Cliff Palace, and Sun Temple. Further work was carried out by the New Deal-era Civilian Conservation Corps starting in 1932 and extending through World War II, which included the construction of various park facilities for visitors and staff, and constructing roads atop the cuesta. The Wetherill Mesa ruins, meanwhile, were stabilized with work being carried out between 1958 and 1965, coinciding with the construction of the Far View accommodations atop the cuesta to the east.

 

The park today features a modern entrance road from US Highway 160, which climbs up the rugged slopes at the north end of the park to the top of the cuesta, stretching across the top of the cuesta to the south, where it connects to various roads that allow visitors to access the overlooks and trails for various cliff dwellings and archaeological sites on Chapin Mesa and Wetherill Mesa. Two areas of tourist accommodation also exist at Far View in the northern section of the park, and the administrative district at Spruce Tree Point at the southern end of the park.

 

The park was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1966, and was designated a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1978. Today, the park sees over half a million visitors annually, and continues to preserve and maintain the ancient structures built by the Ancestral Puebloans.

MONTGOMERY, Alabama (March 23, 2016) – Against the backdrop of the Alabama River at the Union Station Train Shed, 300 conservation district supervisors, conservation partners, and students gathered to hear the Alabama Soil & Water Conservation Committee (SWCC) launch a new initiative to continue its mission of conserving Alabama’s natural resources: Conserve Alabama.

 

Visit conservealabama.gov to learn more about the campaign.

Lens: Letiz Summicron-c 40mm f2.0 M

Melanie Nakagawa, Special Assistant to the President and NSC Senior Director for Climate and Energy, provides remarks for the U.S. Center event "U.S. Efforts to Conserve Global Forests and Other Critical Carbon Sinks" at the 26th Conference of the Parties (COP26) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), held in Glasgow, United Kingdom, from October 31 to November 12, 2021. [State Department photo/Public Domain]

MONTGOMERY, Alabama (March 23, 2016) – Against the backdrop of the Alabama River at the Union Station Train Shed, 300 conservation district supervisors, conservation partners, and students gathered to hear the Alabama Soil & Water Conservation Committee (SWCC) launch a new initiative to continue its mission of conserving Alabama’s natural resources: Conserve Alabama.

 

Visit conservealabama.gov to learn more about the campaign.

Founded in 1906, Mesa Verde National Park was created to conserve and protect the Ancestral Puebloan archaeological sites and cliff dwellings within the present-day park on the sides and top of a large tree-covered cuesta, known as Mesa Verde, that rises approximately 1,500 feet (785 meters) above the surrounding canyons and valleys, with rugged canyons cutting through the cuesta, lined with sandstone cliffs and ledges.

 

The area was inhabited by indigenous people for thousands of years prior to the rise of the Ancestral Puebloan culture, whom developed villages and farmsteads within what is today Mesa Verde National Park beginning around the year 750, with the structures built by the Ancestral Puebloans growing in complexity and durability, especially due to contact with the nearby culture centered around Chaco Canyon. The famous cliff dwellings for which the area is famous, however, were built between approximately 1020 and 1260, especially after a major drought in the region between 1130 and 1180, which led to a major migration of people from Chaco Canyon to Mesa Verde. The people of Chaco Canyon brought their culture, construction techniques, and goods with them, which is evident at archaeological sites on the cuesta.

 

The area began to depopulate between 1260 and 1285 due to environmental conditions becoming less favorable, with the people of Mesa Verde moving to the lowlands of what is today New Mexico and Arizona, with many founding or joining Pueblo settlements in these regions that still exist today. The stone houses were left to the elements, and were left uninhabited, only remembered by the descendants of the Ancestral Puebloans and the other indigenous groups who called the area home, most notably the Utes.

 

The ancient ruins were discovered by European-Americans in 1873, and were documented between 1875 and 1888, with various cliff dwellings and archaeological sites being relatively well-preserved and recognizable to explorers, archaeologists, and scientists whom visited the modern-day park. However, the removal of artifacts from the cuesta became a major concern, and efforts began in 1889 to protect the area as a National Park.

 

The park covers an area of 82 square miles (212 square kilometers), and features multiple Ancestral Puebloan and other indigenous archaeological sites, and was taken from the Ute people, with land being taken from the Utes after the establishment of the park to expand its borders. The park long struggled with proper interpretation and inclusion of the voices of the Puebloan people, whose ancestors built the ancient dwellings and lived at what are today archaeological sites, with work presently ongoing to redress these issues.

 

The ruins at the park underwent reconstitution and stabilization between 1908 and 1922, with extensive work being done on Spruce Tree House, Cliff Palace, and Sun Temple. Further work was carried out by the New Deal-era Civilian Conservation Corps starting in 1932 and extending through World War II, which included the construction of various park facilities for visitors and staff, and constructing roads atop the cuesta. The Wetherill Mesa ruins, meanwhile, were stabilized with work being carried out between 1958 and 1965, coinciding with the construction of the Far View accommodations atop the cuesta to the east.

 

The park today features a modern entrance road from US Highway 160, which climbs up the rugged slopes at the north end of the park to the top of the cuesta, stretching across the top of the cuesta to the south, where it connects to various roads that allow visitors to access the overlooks and trails for various cliff dwellings and archaeological sites on Chapin Mesa and Wetherill Mesa. Two areas of tourist accommodation also exist at Far View in the northern section of the park, and the administrative district at Spruce Tree Point at the southern end of the park.

 

The park was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1966, and was designated a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1978. Today, the park sees over half a million visitors annually, and continues to preserve and maintain the ancient structures built by the Ancestral Puebloans.

Session 3: Community-conserved areas in the future management of biodiversity, land and water in the Mediterranean

Session 3: La conservation communautaire des espaces dans la gestion future de la biodiversité, du sol et de l’eau dans la région méditerranéenne

Ulcinj (Montenegro) - 28 October 2016

1st Mediterranean Plant Conservation Week “Building a regional network to conserve plants and cultural diversity”

1re Semaine de la conservation des plantes méditerranéennes “Construction d’un réseau régional pour la conservation de la diversité culturelle et végétale”

Photo by Pilar Valbuena for The IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation.

More information on 1st Mediterranean Plant Conservation Week, please visit:

www.medplantsweek.uicnmed.org/

If you use one of our photos, please credit it accordingly and let us know. You can reach us through our Flickr account or at: lourdes.lazaro@iucn.org

Session 3: Community-conserved areas in the future management of biodiversity, land and water in the Mediterranean

Session 3: La conservation communautaire des espaces dans la gestion future de la biodiversité, du sol et de l’eau dans la région méditerranéenne

Ulcinj (Montenegro) - 28 October 2016

1st Mediterranean Plant Conservation Week “Building a regional network to conserve plants and cultural diversity”

1re Semaine de la conservation des plantes méditerranéennes “Construction d’un réseau régional pour la conservation de la diversité culturelle et végétale”

Photo by Pilar Valbuena for The IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation.

More information on 1st Mediterranean Plant Conservation Week, please visit:

www.medplantsweek.uicnmed.org/

If you use one of our photos, please credit it accordingly and let us know. You can reach us through our Flickr account or at: lourdes.lazaro@iucn.org

Session 3: Community-conserved areas in the future management of biodiversity, land and water in the Mediterranean

Session 3: La conservation communautaire des espaces dans la gestion future de la biodiversité, du sol et de l’eau dans la région méditerranéenne

Ulcinj (Montenegro) - 28 October 2016

1st Mediterranean Plant Conservation Week “Building a regional network to conserve plants and cultural diversity”

1re Semaine de la conservation des plantes méditerranéennes “Construction d’un réseau régional pour la conservation de la diversité culturelle et végétale”

Photo by Pilar Valbuena for The IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation.

More information on 1st Mediterranean Plant Conservation Week, please visit:

www.medplantsweek.uicnmed.org/

If you use one of our photos, please credit it accordingly and let us know. You can reach us through our Flickr account or at: lourdes.lazaro@iucn.org

At this seminar, Susmita Dasgupta (World Bank) discussed how her research develops and applies a spatial econometric model that links road upgrading to forest clearing and biodiversity loss in the moist tropical forests of Bolivia, Cameroon and Myanmar.

 

Details at iems.ust.hk/forests

For the first black-and-white film with my new camera Pentax 17 (see below for the details about the camera), I loaded a special film given to me as a gift by « Ateliers de Marinette », Lyon, France. The film was spooled for 30-exposures (60 expected for the Pentax 17 that a half-frame camera) and is a bulk Ilford PanF Plus expire in 2005. The film is however well conserved and it could shot for the original 50 ISO sensitivity.

 

The Pentax 17 was equipped with an Anti-UV 40.5mm Hoya HMC filter. For the camera transportation, I used a small camera bag ThinkTank « Mirrorless Mover 5 » that was well protecting the camera from possibly damaging vibrations when using my bicycles.

 

The expositions were automatically metered by the camera system using the « P » program modes with, or without, flash. For very bright scenes the exposition was corrected by +0.3 to +1EV to compensate the biais induced (and reversely -0.3 to 0.7 EV for very dark scenes to objects).

 

Documentary smartphone picture

Serre aux Camélias, April 17, 2025

Grandes serres tropicales

Jardin Botanique de lyon

Parc de la Tête d'Or

69006 Lyon

France.

 

After completion the film was processed according the Marinette advice in Adox Adonal developer at 1+25 dilution for 7min at 20°C.

 

Single-frame digitizing was made using a Sony A7 camera (ILCE-7, 24MP) fitted to a Minolta Auto Bellows III with the Minolta slide duplication accessory and Minolta Macro Bellow lens 1:3.5 f=50mm at approximate reproduction ratio of 1:2. The diffuse light source was a LED panel CineStill Cine-lite.

 

The RAW files obtained were inverted within the latest version available of Adobe Lightroom Classic (version 14.2) and edited to the final jpeg pictures without intermediate file. They are presented either as printer files with a frame or the full size JPEG's together with some documentary smartphone color pictures.

 

About the camera :

 

Since last Christmas, it was on display in the middle of « reusable » cheap camera’s in the window of my local photography store. But this camera is not cheap and sold at 10-times the price of those « reusable » film camera’s. The Pentax 17 is a novel film camera released by Pentax (a brand belonging to Ricoh Imaging, Japan) in June 2024.

 

The history of « Pentax » name is still something worth to mention. After the WWII, in Dresden (that was heavily destroyed by the bombing of Feb. 13-15, 1945), Germany, The Zeiss Ikon company could not produce anymore the legendary original Contax (a high-reputation professional range-finder 35mm released in 30’s) camera that was taken by Russia and transferred to Kiev, Ukraine, in the USSR. However the brand name Contax survived and the German engineers designed something completely new within several years : the Contax S (S for « Spiegel mirror reflex ») that integrated a pentaprism for a full redressed reflex viewer observation. Zeiss Ikon Dresden registered to new trademarks derived from the words « Pentaprism » and « Contax » that were « Pentax » and « Pentacon ». If Pentacon became the new name of the company in Dresden, the trademark Pentax was bought by Asahi Optical Company in Japan, and became a formidable industrial and commercial success. Asahi Pentax, then Pentax alone, produced amazing quality camera’s including the legendary « Spotmatic » (a 35mm SLR) and stunning medium-format camera’s heavily used by professional photographers. Many of these camera’s of the past century are still operative and appreciated by film photography enthusiast’s.

 

Production of film camera’s vanished progressively in the mid 2000’s, as digital camera’s became of better quality and finally of generalized appliances in photography. The Pentax 17 was introduced to the market in June 2024, it was a big surprise for all the film photography lovers. Seeing a newly engineered brand-new film camera was a sort of renaissance of the film photography today of a growing interest worldwide.

 

The camera is a « half-frame » format on the traditional double-perforated 35mm film giving 17x24mm photograms. This format was not as popular as to classical 24x36mm (full-frame) format of most of the 35mm camera’s. However famous and quality half-frame camera’s were produced in the past including, the long series of Olympus Pen for example. Then, the Pentax 17 immediately attracted the attention of experimented film photographers and camera collectors, probably more than the officially targeted customers of the younger generations. Less than a year after, the future of the Pentax 17 and the film photography project of Pentax is questioned today. The chef-engineer who conducted the project in Ricoh company recently left and the marketing of Pentax 17 is now a question.

 

This finally decided me to buy an exemplary from my local shop and to discover this strange machine. The camera is of course guaranteed, even with a there-year extension after the camera registration on the Pentax website. The whole ergonomic is clearly derived from classical past 35mm camera’s with a fully mechanical film advance and rewind, a collimated Albada viewer, no digital display at all, only levers, barrels, crank and wheels… However inside is a automatic electronic exposure system with flash, the focusing is manual but the electronic mechanism moves the whole optical group with a micro motor.

 

The lens is a Cooke triplet 1:3.5 f=25mm equivalent to a 37mm of a 24x36mm format. The Cooke triplet is a photographic lens designed and patented in 1893 by Dennis Taylor who was employed as chief engineer by T. Cooke & Sons of York. It was the first lens system that allowed the elimination of most of the optical distortion or aberration at the outer edge of the image. It likely for this reason that the lens is unscripted curiously « Traditional » on the front lens ring… It is known that a Cooke triplet lens could give surprisingly good results with only three separated optical elements. The Cooke Triplet is still widely used in inexpensive cameras, including variations using aspheric elements, particularly in cell-phone cameras. The Cooke triplet consists of three separated lenses positioned at the finite distance. It is often considered that the triplet is one of the most important discoveries in the field of photographic objectives

 

The lens receives 40.5mm diameter thread filters that I use for my Zorki / Leningrad lenses Jupiter-8 2/50mm, Jupiter-11 4/135mm and Jupiter-12 2.8/35mm. The metal shade hood Minolta D42KA could mounted on the filter but I have to check is there is vignette induced.

 

The camera size is close to the original dimensions of a thread-mount Leica (called also the original Barnack Leica) which are, in a way, a sort of « Gold » size in the 35mm camera’s. I compared with my Zorki 1D year 1954 that is a straight reproduction of the Leica Iic. The upper deck of Pentax 17 is designed very clearly as a classical 35mm and we even find the original logo of Asahi Optical Company. The rewind crank is also a revival of past design seen on old Pentax SLR as my year-1971 Spotmatic SP in this seres of pictures.

 

The Pentax 17 is very light (about 300g) compared to those old ancestors that weight easily the double or the triple. It is then an effortless camera to carry. The Pentax 17 fits in the small ThinkTank bag (called « Mirorless Mover 5 ») that I recently bought to safely carry a film back of my Hasselblad or my Bronica 6X6 camera’s. In this tiny bag, the camera is protected for the element and vibrations due to cycling for instance.

  

Reference

 

analoguewonderland.co.uk/blogs/film-photography-blog/pent...

 

Key features and specifications

* Half-frame image capture (17 x 24mm)

* 37mm (equiv.) FOV F3.5 lens

* Zone focusing system with 6 zones

* Circular leaf shutter (F3.5-16)

* Built-in flash (6m/20ft at ISO100)

* Optical tunnel viewfinder with frame lines

* Exposure from 1/350 sec to 4 sec (+ Bulb)

* Supports films from ISO 50 to ISO 3200

 

Specifically the lens has:

1. HD coating, which maintains high performance of the lens, by using this PENTAX multi-coating. This also enables high contrast and high definition right to the edges.

2. SP coating (Super Protect) which helps to repel water and oil from the lens.

 

The fact that the focusing on the Pentax 17 is electronic i.e. the lens only moves when you half-press the shutter gives me faith that autofocus was already considered in the R&D stage.

Taken with Canon Rebel XS digital-SLR camera

Design: John Jirasek (Mr. Domino) vs. Jared Stumpenhorst (JS Stumps) / Rochelle, IL

I know, I know...rule of thirds. It was a shot I couldn't resist and tookwithout considering that.

 

© All rights reserved.

Founded in 1906, Mesa Verde National Park was created to conserve and protect the Ancestral Puebloan archaeological sites and cliff dwellings within the present-day park on the sides and top of a large tree-covered cuesta, known as Mesa Verde, that rises approximately 1,500 feet (785 meters) above the surrounding canyons and valleys, with rugged canyons cutting through the cuesta, lined with sandstone cliffs and ledges.

 

The area was inhabited by indigenous people for thousands of years prior to the rise of the Ancestral Puebloan culture, whom developed villages and farmsteads within what is today Mesa Verde National Park beginning around the year 750, with the structures built by the Ancestral Puebloans growing in complexity and durability, especially due to contact with the nearby culture centered around Chaco Canyon. The famous cliff dwellings for which the area is famous, however, were built between approximately 1020 and 1260, especially after a major drought in the region between 1130 and 1180, which led to a major migration of people from Chaco Canyon to Mesa Verde. The people of Chaco Canyon brought their culture, construction techniques, and goods with them, which is evident at archaeological sites on the cuesta.

 

The area began to depopulate between 1260 and 1285 due to environmental conditions becoming less favorable, with the people of Mesa Verde moving to the lowlands of what is today New Mexico and Arizona, with many founding or joining Pueblo settlements in these regions that still exist today. The stone houses were left to the elements, and were left uninhabited, only remembered by the descendants of the Ancestral Puebloans and the other indigenous groups who called the area home, most notably the Utes.

 

The ancient ruins were discovered by European-Americans in 1873, and were documented between 1875 and 1888, with various cliff dwellings and archaeological sites being relatively well-preserved and recognizable to explorers, archaeologists, and scientists whom visited the modern-day park. However, the removal of artifacts from the cuesta became a major concern, and efforts began in 1889 to protect the area as a National Park.

 

The park covers an area of 82 square miles (212 square kilometers), and features multiple Ancestral Puebloan and other indigenous archaeological sites, and was taken from the Ute people, with land being taken from the Utes after the establishment of the park to expand its borders. The park long struggled with proper interpretation and inclusion of the voices of the Puebloan people, whose ancestors built the ancient dwellings and lived at what are today archaeological sites, with work presently ongoing to redress these issues.

 

The ruins at the park underwent reconstitution and stabilization between 1908 and 1922, with extensive work being done on Spruce Tree House, Cliff Palace, and Sun Temple. Further work was carried out by the New Deal-era Civilian Conservation Corps starting in 1932 and extending through World War II, which included the construction of various park facilities for visitors and staff, and constructing roads atop the cuesta. The Wetherill Mesa ruins, meanwhile, were stabilized with work being carried out between 1958 and 1965, coinciding with the construction of the Far View accommodations atop the cuesta to the east.

 

The park today features a modern entrance road from US Highway 160, which climbs up the rugged slopes at the north end of the park to the top of the cuesta, stretching across the top of the cuesta to the south, where it connects to various roads that allow visitors to access the overlooks and trails for various cliff dwellings and archaeological sites on Chapin Mesa and Wetherill Mesa. Two areas of tourist accommodation also exist at Far View in the northern section of the park, and the administrative district at Spruce Tree Point at the southern end of the park.

 

The park was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1966, and was designated a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1978. Today, the park sees over half a million visitors annually, and continues to preserve and maintain the ancient structures built by the Ancestral Puebloans.

Session 3: Community-conserved areas in the future management of biodiversity, land and water in the Mediterranean

Session 3: La conservation communautaire des espaces dans la gestion future de la biodiversité, du sol et de l’eau dans la région méditerranéenne

Ulcinj (Montenegro) - 28 October 2016

1st Mediterranean Plant Conservation Week “Building a regional network to conserve plants and cultural diversity”

1re Semaine de la conservation des plantes méditerranéennes “Construction d’un réseau régional pour la conservation de la diversité culturelle et végétale”

Photo by Pilar Valbuena for The IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation.

More information on 1st Mediterranean Plant Conservation Week, please visit:

www.medplantsweek.uicnmed.org/

If you use one of our photos, please credit it accordingly and let us know. You can reach us through our Flickr account or at: lourdes.lazaro@iucn.org

Shots taken during the removal of the 18th century glass in the east window for cleaning and repair by Norgrove Studios in 2017.

 

St Mary's at Preston on Stour is a gem of a church. The tower and nave are mostly the original late medieval work but with significant remodeling in 1752-64 (by Edward Woodward of Chipping Campden) The chancel was entirely rebuilt at this time, though the effect is surprisingly homogeneous.

 

Inside the chancel are several wall-mounted monuments of 17th & 18th century date, but it is the stained glass which takes centre stage, with a magnificent collection of Continental roundels in the east window, and two superb and extremely unusual side windows by William Price from the 1750s, with standing saints flanked by an eccentric collection of portrait medallions.

 

There is further notable glass in the west window under the tower, which seems to be indigenous work of 15th & 16th century dates, possibly original to the church, though sadly difficult to see without special access to the bell ringing chamber.

To conserve the foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii), a wildlife crew on the Tahoe National Forest surveys for the frogs and their egg masses in a stream bed where illegal off-highway driving occurs, further damaging this ecosystem impacted by the legacy of historical hydraulic mining. The egg masses are at risk of being run over, so the crew looks for signs of tire tracks to determine what egg masses need to be moved to a safer part of the stream. There are many places in the forest to enjoy off-high way driving, but sensitive aquatic ecosystems like this one are not the place. Tahoe National Forest, May 2023. (USDA Forest Service photo by Jamie Hinrichs)

Founded in 1906, Mesa Verde National Park was created to conserve and protect the Ancestral Puebloan archaeological sites and cliff dwellings within the present-day park on the sides and top of a large tree-covered cuesta, known as Mesa Verde, that rises approximately 1,500 feet (785 meters) above the surrounding canyons and valleys, with rugged canyons cutting through the cuesta, lined with sandstone cliffs and ledges.

 

The area was inhabited by indigenous people for thousands of years prior to the rise of the Ancestral Puebloan culture, whom developed villages and farmsteads within what is today Mesa Verde National Park beginning around the year 750, with the structures built by the Ancestral Puebloans growing in complexity and durability, especially due to contact with the nearby culture centered around Chaco Canyon. The famous cliff dwellings for which the area is famous, however, were built between approximately 1020 and 1260, especially after a major drought in the region between 1130 and 1180, which led to a major migration of people from Chaco Canyon to Mesa Verde. The people of Chaco Canyon brought their culture, construction techniques, and goods with them, which is evident at archaeological sites on the cuesta.

 

The area began to depopulate between 1260 and 1285 due to environmental conditions becoming less favorable, with the people of Mesa Verde moving to the lowlands of what is today New Mexico and Arizona, with many founding or joining Pueblo settlements in these regions that still exist today. The stone houses were left to the elements, and were left uninhabited, only remembered by the descendants of the Ancestral Puebloans and the other indigenous groups who called the area home, most notably the Utes.

 

The ancient ruins were discovered by European-Americans in 1873, and were documented between 1875 and 1888, with various cliff dwellings and archaeological sites being relatively well-preserved and recognizable to explorers, archaeologists, and scientists whom visited the modern-day park. However, the removal of artifacts from the cuesta became a major concern, and efforts began in 1889 to protect the area as a National Park.

 

The park covers an area of 82 square miles (212 square kilometers), and features multiple Ancestral Puebloan and other indigenous archaeological sites, and was taken from the Ute people, with land being taken from the Utes after the establishment of the park to expand its borders. The park long struggled with proper interpretation and inclusion of the voices of the Puebloan people, whose ancestors built the ancient dwellings and lived at what are today archaeological sites, with work presently ongoing to redress these issues.

 

The ruins at the park underwent reconstitution and stabilization between 1908 and 1922, with extensive work being done on Spruce Tree House, Cliff Palace, and Sun Temple. Further work was carried out by the New Deal-era Civilian Conservation Corps starting in 1932 and extending through World War II, which included the construction of various park facilities for visitors and staff, and constructing roads atop the cuesta. The Wetherill Mesa ruins, meanwhile, were stabilized with work being carried out between 1958 and 1965, coinciding with the construction of the Far View accommodations atop the cuesta to the east.

 

The park today features a modern entrance road from US Highway 160, which climbs up the rugged slopes at the north end of the park to the top of the cuesta, stretching across the top of the cuesta to the south, where it connects to various roads that allow visitors to access the overlooks and trails for various cliff dwellings and archaeological sites on Chapin Mesa and Wetherill Mesa. Two areas of tourist accommodation also exist at Far View in the northern section of the park, and the administrative district at Spruce Tree Point at the southern end of the park.

 

The park was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1966, and was designated a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1978. Today, the park sees over half a million visitors annually, and continues to preserve and maintain the ancient structures built by the Ancestral Puebloans.

Conserve water and feed the soil, reap the benefits!

By adopting sustainable agricultural practices that prioritize water conservation an soil health, we not only ensure the resilience of our food systems but also contribute to the broader goals of environmental sustainability. The bountiful harvest reaped from these efforts extends far beyond the fields, shaping the healthier and more sustainable future for our planet and its inhabitants.

 

Mark Lester Bagay, Philippines

Conserve are providing Architectural Design support services, which we believe will be a solution for your vision. Visit @ www.conservesolution.com/what-we-do/architecture/

MONTGOMERY, Alabama (March 23, 2016) – Against the backdrop of the Alabama River at the Union Station Train Shed, 300 conservation district supervisors, conservation partners, and students gathered to hear the Alabama Soil & Water Conservation Committee (SWCC) launch a new initiative to continue its mission of conserving Alabama’s natural resources: Conserve Alabama.

 

Visit conservealabama.gov to learn more about the campaign.

MONTGOMERY, Alabama (March 23, 2016) – Against the backdrop of the Alabama River at the Union Station Train Shed, 300 conservation district supervisors, conservation partners, and students gathered to hear the Alabama Soil & Water Conservation Committee (SWCC) launch a new initiative to continue its mission of conserving Alabama’s natural resources: Conserve Alabama.

 

Visit conservealabama.gov to learn more about the campaign.

Session 3: Community-conserved areas in the future management of biodiversity, land and water in the Mediterranean

Session 3: La conservation communautaire des espaces dans la gestion future de la biodiversité, du sol et de l’eau dans la région méditerranéenne

Ulcinj (Montenegro) - 28 October 2016

1st Mediterranean Plant Conservation Week “Building a regional network to conserve plants and cultural diversity”

1re Semaine de la conservation des plantes méditerranéennes “Construction d’un réseau régional pour la conservation de la diversité culturelle et végétale”

Photo by Pilar Valbuena for The IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation.

More information on 1st Mediterranean Plant Conservation Week, please visit:

www.medplantsweek.uicnmed.org/

If you use one of our photos, please credit it accordingly and let us know. You can reach us through our Flickr account or at: lourdes.lazaro@iucn.org

Lifecycle Building Center's 2017 Annual Fundraiser to support LBC's Nonprofit Material Match Program, which connects usable building materials destined for landfills with nonprofits, community organizations, schools and houses of faith that can use them for their facility renovation and construction projects.

1 2 ••• 64 65 67 69 70 ••• 79 80