View allAll Photos Tagged ayodhya
.
STUDENTS' FEDERATION OF INDIA ALL INDIA STUDENTS' FEDERATION 14.10.03 .
DEFEAT THE SANGH GIROH's CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY IN AYODHYAI I · e.
·.
h he ·IS by threatemng communa nots across th .
october 17th. There is no doubt that the only place for Togadia and his followers, who have repeatedly flaunted theirFriends,Praveen Togadla has once again shown himself for the t ug .
country If the VHP Is not allowed to go ahead with its inflammatory and provocative programme in Ayodhya on .
defiance of the law of the land, is behind bars. However, one has to reckon with the fact that they can count among their accomplices the Prime Minister of the country, who, when asked to take action to defend public order and communal harmony, asks us to "trust the VHP". If our memory of 61h December, 1992 had become dim, Mr. Togadla .~ has now reminded us in quite explicit terms the VHP plans to do. .
The VHP's ultimatums on the Ayodhya issue have a very blatant correlation with election dates. Last year the .
Cfttrlect BJP having lost badly in the earlier municipal elections In the state. The culmination of this communal campaign was.
l'lte~t~. .
h::'ct"'rnun same VHP-Bajrang Dal had given the call for a shiladaan programme just prior to the Gujarat Assembly elections, the Is th the unprecedented state-sponsored carnage of February-March which claimed thousands of innocent lives. The .
16.....8rrJiy C:h, the Ayodhya issue. The implication is clear: vote the BJP to power with a majority of its own in the coming Lok Sabha .
electoral motivations are even more crudely obvious this time round: the VHP's demand is for a Central legislation on .
''-INflling, .
elections and the temple will be built in Ayodhya regardless of the Supreme Court's decisions. .
However the experience of the years of NDA rule have made the people wise to the Sangh Glroh's.
f'efuseoto.
Participate .
machinations. Along with Togadia's statement, today's newspapers also report the opposition expressed by the .
people of Ayodhya to the VHP's call. Relatives of the victims of the condemnable Godhra incident-on whose tragic deaths Modi built his fascistic theory of action and reaction-have come out openly against harassment by the lumpens of the Sangh Giroh. Faced with this popular opposition to its gameplan, the Sangh Giroh has become increasingly desperate. Vajpayee no longer goes about with his moderate mukhota, engineering cynical proposals of 'negotiated' settlements through sants and seers. He explicitly echoes VHP-Bajrang Dal's defiance of the Supreme Court and the law. For, it is clear that if it wants to escape the wrath of the people, it is only in the VHP that the Sangh .
What is unfortunate is the complete opportunism shown by the principal oppositional formation, the Congress, .
in the face of this communal threat. As a result the lack of any initiatives on people's issues and given its continuedcan trust. .
commitment to the anti-people policies of liberalisation, the Congress is trying to hold on to power by compromising on Togadia. Even in our own campus we find the same tendency at work, with the NSUI welcoming a well-known the issue of secularism. Its leaders like A.K. Antony are publicly hobnobbing with criminals of the Sangh Giroh like communal and casteist lumpen who was the President of the ABVP's JNU unit into its organisation and bringing out .
processions in which known communal elements of this campus participate. .
The Sangh is today trying to drag our country back into medieval times by its communal politics and the opportunism of formations like the Congress can hardly be an answer to it. We call upon all progressive, democratic-.
minded and secular people to unite behind the Left and democratic alternative and give a fitting rebuff to the RSS-.
VHP-ABVP's polftics of hate. .
PUBLIC MEETING .
Guest Speakers: .
COM. D. RAJA COM. PRAKASH KARAT [National Secretary, CPI] .
[Politbureau Member, CPI(M)] .
14.10.03 (Tonight), 9:30p.m. Sutlej Mess .
SFI-AISF PANEL FOR JNUSU ELECTIONS 2003 Vice-President: ENA PANDA .
President: ROHIT Joint Secretary: MURTAZA ALl ATHAR .
General Secretary: B. MAHESH SARMA SLL&CSSIS ATIF ANWARsss A. ARUN PRASHANTH FAUZAN ABRAR .
I.
-· JYOTSNA SINGH GUNJAN SINGH KUNAL KASHYAPLATIKA BISHNOI NILA MOHANAN MANIZAH IMAM MUQBIL AHMAR RAJIV KUMAR RANJAN RAVIBHUSHANSONA MITRA SHELLY JOHNY SUMEET R. MHASKAR .
ANUBHUTI MAURYA, SHAMSHAD A. KHAN, Co-Convenors, Central Campaign Committee, SFI-AISF .
Sdi-.
/ stopj,;db "t~~u~no u .
\1.1.
relettte · %.
111·10·0!1 \--.
.
Khudai Khidmatgar organized a camp in Ayodhya Dec 23-25. Around 55
participants from eight states attended the leadership camp. The program
included "parbhat pheri" from Ayodhya Railway Station to Saryu river and
"sharm-daan" at Saryu Ghat.
The Supreme Court Judgment Says that according to the faith,belief and trust of the Hindus The Janmaasthan of Lord Ram at Ayodhya on Sarayu River is the place where he was born. This does not mean that the actual birthplace of Lord Ram was located here.
www.commonprophets.com/the-location-of-birthplace-of-lord...
आप सभी को श्री रामनवमी की हार्दिक शुभकामनाएँ
#rajeshmehta #Rajeshmehtabjp #rajeshmehtamumbaibjp #mehtarajesh #Mehtarajeshbjp #rajeshmehtavileparle #Rajeshmehtanorthcentral #bjpmumbai #Mahrashtrabjp #poonamMahajan #Mangalprabhatlodha #paragalvani #Amitsatav #DevendraFadanavis #ramayan #ram #shriram #hindu #india #ramnavami #navratri #sunillahri #hanuman #ramcharitmanas #sitaram #jayshriram #hinduism #ramseeta #arungovil #jaishreeram #ramayanback #valmikiramayan #ramanandsagar #ayodhya #jaishriram #shreeram #corona #mahabharat #jayshreeram #durgapuja #shiva #bhfyp
.
The Ayodhya Verdict: Dipankar Bha·acha-.
rya.
A Blow to the Spirit of Modern India.
.
On the eve of the Allahabad High Court verdict on Ayodhya, we had said the verdict would be a "test case for India's.
secularism, democracy and justice." Now, following a close look at the shocking verdict, we must say it has failed.
this test on every count. 30 September, 2010 will now be bracketed with 6 December, 1992. Eighteen years after the.
dastardly physical demolition of the Babri Masjid, we have now seen its judicial demolition, a verdict that flies in the.
face of the basic principles of justice and rule of law, and challenges the fundamental spirit of a secular, democratic.
modern India..
.
The High Court was supposed to decide on the title suit regarding the disputed site. It is well known that the BJP and.
its Sangh siblings were all along wary of the court deciding on this case on the plea that the whole issue concerned.
"faith" and there could be no adjudication over "faith". It was clear to them that they had no legal basis for their claim.
and hence they chose the way of cheating the country. They assured everybody that the law of the land would be.
honoured, and then betrayed their own words to demolish the mosque through a communal-fascistic mobilisation in.
broad daylight..
.
Today, the Sangh is jubilant that the High Court has turned "faith" into law. All the three judges have accepted the fact.
that the idols of Ram, Sita and Bharat were smuggled in from outside on the intervening night of 22-23 December, 1949..
Yet the judges have ruled by 2-1 majority that the "disputed structure" was not a mosque because it was apparently.
constructed by demolishing a Hindu religious structure and hence according to the tenets of Islam, it could not have.
the sanctity of a mosque! The other judge has of course differed on both counts - but the majority view prevailed..
.
The verdict is based heavily on two factors - the so-called `archaeological evidence' marshalled by the ASI in its 2003.
report that there was a Hindu temple on the site before the mosque was built, and the `faith' held by many Hindus that.
the disputed area is the birthplace of Lord Ram. The ASI report has been widely questioned and rejected by a whole.
range of historians and archaeologists, and can at best be treated as a piece of speculative conjecture based on.
dubious evidence and questionable interpretation. The other aspect, `faith', is just that - faith, which can by no means.
be treated as an evidence to decide a title suit..
.
By treating Ram as a juristic entity (albeit a minor) represented by his self-appointed `guardian' in a title suit, the Alla-.
habad High Court has set up a dangerous precedent of mixing blind faith and prejudice, masquerading as religion, with.
jurisprudence. It should be noted that the youngest litigant in this case, Ram Lalla Virajman, which has been awarded.
one-third of the disputed site including the all important central dome, claimed by the Sangh brigade as the exact.
birthplace of Lord Ram, was set up in 1989 by none other than a former judge of the Allahabad High Court, Shri Deoki.
Nandan Agarwal, who played a key role in making a `legal' case out of the Mandir campaign of the Sangh brigade..
.
Having conceded the Ramjanambhoomi claim on thoroughly questionable grounds, the judges sought to give the.
whole thing the appearance of a reconciliatory measure whereby the disputed land would be apportioned into three.
equal parts with one part going to the waqf board. Reconciliation can only be attempted and achieved on the basis of.
truth and justice. In this case, both truth (at least recorded historical truth) and justice have been sacrificed at the altar.
of this phoney reconciliation formula and hence it is a compound travesty of all three. Can there ever be a dignified.
compromise by compromising truth and justice?.
.
After Gujarat genocide, the BJP had been steadily losing ground in most parts of the country. Ever since its debacle.
in the 2009 Lok Sabha election - its second successive defeat in five years, the party seemed virtually clueless as.
to how to arrest its continuing state of demoralisation and desperation. Now the Allahabad High Court verdict has.
breathed some fresh life into the demoralised and desperate saffron camp. Advani has already described the verdict.
as heralding a new chapter in the country's history of national integration. In all likelihood, an emboldened BJP will.
now try and reopen the whole gamut of its `suspended agenda' and refuel its Hindutva campaign..
.
The judicial trajectory of the case will now reach the Supreme Court. It remains to be seen if and how far the Supreme.
Court can salvage the spirit of law and justice and heal the post-Ayodhya wound on the body polity and the composite.
culture of the country that has only been rendered deeper and more acute by the Allahabad High Court verdict. Every.
effort must be made to make sure that the glorious tradition of India's composite culture and the secular democratic.
vision of modern India prevail over the Sangh brigade's conspiracy to redefine India on retrograde majoritarian lines..
If the possibility of an out-of-court settlement has to be explored even at this stage, it must not be at the cost of the.
basic principle of reason and justice..
.
India must and shall move on, and precisely for this purpose the forces of unreason and obscurantism need to be.
pushed back. There can be no compromise with the crude champions of the `might is right' argument who are des-.
.
an aisa releaseperate to silence the voices of reason and progress by all means..
(from ML Update Editorial 5-12 Oct).
..
Prime Minister Narendra Modi is likely to spend around three hours tomorrow in Ayodhya, where he will perform puja for the Ram Temple. PM Modi and four other persons will be on the stage for the mega event organised in the middle of the country's fight against the coronavirus
.
Jointly orgauized wit/J Anveshatt.
--~~-----~~~~~------------~~------------· .
the l'!!Odh'!la \lerdtct and us sammcauons .
Sukumar Muralidharan.Noted Joumalist Anil Nauriya, Seuior Lawyer, Supreme CourtSpeakeProf.rs K.M.Shrimali.Emi ueut Historinu 14 oct. Toda ·Kaveri ess 2.30 m Siddharth Varadarajan.Chief of Bureau, Tile Jliudu .
Much hf!S been written and said about the judgment of the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court in the Babri Masjid-.
Ram Janmbhoomi title suite and other matters. While it is a matter of relief that no untoward incidents or communal flare ups .
have been witnessed after the verdict was pronounced, the judgment has failed to give a sense of justice to all those who .
.
believe in the secular-democratic tramiiwor1<. which the Indian Constitution provides for .
. The most unfortunate and alarming part of the judgment is that it has accorded priority to matters of "faith and belief' in making its pronouncements.The manner in which three judgeshave arrived at the conclusion that the place where the central dome of the Babri Masjid once existed is the birthplace of Ramlala and justified it by citing faith is a step back from modern values our instituUons should stand tor. In doing so, not only have the judges ignored historical facts and evidences or the lack of \hem, they have also (even if inadvertently) set a dangerous precedent which can be exploited by divisive groups and vested .
.
interests to fan similar communal frenzy by undertaking mobilizations of the like of the Ram Mandir Movement The proof of .
this can be seen in the statements of tl)e likes of LK Advani, who has found vindication for his notorious Rath Yatra in the High .
Court verdict What he and the others in the right wing Hindutva brigade have not said explicitly but is being implied is \he .
.
feeling of vindication for the demolition of the 500 year old mosque which stood in Ayodhya..
The Sangh Parivar including the ABVP on campus has been running a communally charged campaign celebrating the verdict .
and attacking all those raising concerns about the judgment But it is important for all of us to raise our voice and generate .
opinion against this miscarriage of justice and not conform to an unjust and potentially dangerous verdict in the name of .
.
To discuss the ramifications of the verdict the SFI appeals to the student community to attend today's public meeting..
reso\ving the matter. .
Sdi-Lenin, President SFI-JMU Sdl· P K Anand, Secretary SFI-JMU .
.
.
.