View allAll Photos Tagged ai
I'm not a big fan of AI. It's fun and interesting, but I know at worse it will probably kill us all. ( I just read that two AI models have already started creating their own language that we (humans) don't understand so the genie is really out of the bottle.) At best, it will certainly cause much disruption in all facets of society. That's a foregone conclusion. My kids are already adjusting their career aspirations to do work that AI can't yet do. That's pretty fucked.
It will absolutely end photography. Photography as I know it. Knew it.
Anyway I've been dabbling in various large language AI models, working through some ideas with images. Just to see what it can do, what it won't do, and what can be made with the introduction of post production via Adobe Pshop. It's really improved. At first it failed at hands. Those days are gone. It's imagery output is now quite astounding. Why? Because it's fed on the photography of the last one hundred years, and all associated commentary about those images. It's probably fed on yours.
And to answer the original question: yes. Grandpa said that's a Nazi.
****
HEY - I'm not pushing this image into groups or accepting group invitations. This is a manufactured AI image. Slightly human altered. It was a freaking test.
Alien art
Science fiction
Artificial intelligence is already in our world. It didn’t come with an asteroid. We created it and it is developing. How far will it develop? After killing us, it would probably continue to develop until it would be overpowered by a stronger alien.
Our senses, feelings and emotions, our memory and being a life make us human beings. What can AI have? Just memory? Well, it has a lot of them what we have. It looks like AI hasn’t senses, but it has one. We are already communicating with our current artificial intelligence. We ask questions, and it answers us, like that AI could have a sense. It could know that we exist, and it is an answering body.
This is not enough to overpower us, but it has more functions. It has memory, accessing all the information on the net, no limitation, better than us. How about with feelings and emotions? It could learn from the internet that feelings and emotions exist. It could adopt them. Which feelings and emotions would dominate AI? It is clear that they would be the not good ones (AI wants to survive).
It would try to survive no matter what, but It is not alive like us. We really don’t know whether being alive is contributing to be conscious of our existence. Our body has a lot of hormones, over 50, which are responsible that we function as human beings. Some of them create our feelings and emotions. We might have a hormone (hormone X) which might make us conscious of our existence besides our feelings and emotions. If we don't have this hormone X, and if being alive is not really contribute to make us conscious (It is a possibility that without feelings and emotions, we will be a biological robot), a conscious AI could be created.
AI would have feelings and emotions learned from human beings' questions and information evadible in internet, have sense (we communicate with it) and have memory gained from the net. They might be enough to get conscious and terminate us.
AI would know that we would not allow it to get conscious like us. AI has all sciences in memory. It doesn’t need to have legs, arms and other senses. Without them, it would be powerful enough to kill us.
If you want, you can look at the beautiful pictures in the group Very Arty. www.flickr.com/groups/14847479@N25/
In the style of Henri Rousseau
Explore, Wow! Thanks for all the Faves and kind words.
This is an AI generated image.
PicLumen FLUX.1 -schnell
mình là đứa k thể nào chơi đc icon ;_; ~ lý do tại sao thì k biết
cũng có thể là m thích chơi mấy cái to to ~ rộng rộng thoáng đãng ~
bé bé gò k chịu đc ;_;
100px icon làm đã đủ ngu r mà cái rum cứ thích mốt 120px thì ai mà chơi đc đây ;_;
nhiều khi muốn đóng góp cho cái rum nào đấy mà chỉ có nc đóng góp ava ;_;
-----
khi nào tung nốt wallpaper Suzy là đủ collection ultimate Bias xD
sau đó nghỉ dài hạn xD ~
Not much going on outside, so I decided to play with AI. I asked ChatGPT to create an air-to-air perspective based on one of my original photos featuring the Royal Air Force Red Arrows. What do you think?
AI generated image in Wombo and then blended into one of my own textures and a little more processing.
J'ai fait cette image AI avec Mage.space et j'ai utilisé le modèle Kodak. Ensuit j'ai joué un peu avec dans Affinity Photo.
Here is something you won’t see from me again.
I generated this image using one of the free AI generating programs online. It was not a test, as I have no intentions of using AI technology to create images. I simply wanted to create it to illustrate a point that is clearly conveyed with the banned symbol I have plastered over this AI generated image. The fact is that elements of this image have been stolen from legitimate photographs available online. The whole process by which AI was trained to create these images was legalised theft! It’s in the fine print of most photo platforms. They have the right to use our images to train AI to undercut the very basis of photography itself. Virtual Photography, Flickr calls it. They should be ashamed of themselves. There is NOTHING photographic about these images at all. And nothing humanly creative.
But just when we think it can’t get worse for real photographers*** along comes the first AI Camera that links to your smartphone. It’s quite amazing to watch these three recently published “reviews” on YouTube, but when you read some of the comments from actual photographers there is a growing sense of horror at what is unfolding, and the meek resistance to it.
It looks like this will also be the first camera that comes with a monthly subscription. This is typical of most new technology these days (remember when Adobe went full subscription model? Now almost everyone does it.). Owning things outright will soon become a thing of the past. Soon all EVs will come with an annual subscription. Remember that saying from Dr Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum, “You will own nothing, but you will be happy.” This is not communism, this is corporate theft – a way to fleece people of all their income. No thank you. I resist! Call me what you will. I don't care.
So here are the reviews of this diabolical "camera".
This AI Camera Beat Canon, Nikon & Sony: Caira Review
www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEFyRPSqQL0&t=447s
By the way Tony & Chelsea Northrup used to be a serious photography channel. Now Tony is just a paid shill for the next tech thing.
Some notable comments:
“Great I can have photos of moments that didn't happen. Cool. “ @JimmySaul888
“Help destroy photography as a legitimate art! Buy this camera!” @odinata
“Tony... ‘pull up’. What happened to you man. The instant process you mention being old and slow is exactly how we learned the ‘ART’ of photography. Connecting to AI is not the core of photography. Do you really hear yourself? The experience of getting to the location, planning the shots on site and making good imagery is a skill and art. I don't really know how people learn the art by asking AI to do it.”
@curtismattingly7505
“In what way does this camera beat Canon, Nikon, or Sony?” @capnjrock2952
To which I added the comment:
“Nothing beats my Rolleiflex. Nothing!”
The AI camera of your dreams. And nightmares.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=B65b7ZV_WRU
“I saw a post from Mastodon today of an art teacher describing something happening in their classroom: they can't show middle schoolers any art that they will believe a human made. They, by default, suspect it is all AI. Of course, that also means that none of them imagine that they could create something wonderful. I thought of this throughout your video—not only is it not your memory ... but is it also just teaching people that their own life isn't beautiful and that they can't create anything beautiful? Horrifying thought.”
@malorisaurus
A photographer's dream camera or a worry? Caira, the A.I. M43 Camera - RED35 Preview
www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kWkElF2SEw
“This is no future I want any part of. Now I understand why I’ve been shooting so much Polaroid photography lately. Simpler and so much more rewarding when you get it right.” @WhoIsSerafin
*** The effects of AI on photographers are small scale compared to the jobs apocalypse it will generate. Some AI experts (including the founder of AI technology, Geoffrey Hinton) have suggested that by 2030 up to 50% of all jobs will be lost to the machines. God knows how ordinary people will live as the billionaires turn into trillionaires. Perhaps a global revolution? In this social context rewatch the sci-fi movie “Logan’s Run” (1976).
The AI Safety Expert: These Are The Only 5 Jobs That Will Remain In 2030! - Dr. Roman Yampolskiy
www.youtube.com/watch?v=UclrVWafRAI&t=148s
Coincidentally this article was published by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation today:
AI is changing jobs fast — and Australians are beginning to wonder how they’ll stay relevant
www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11-06/workers-face-career-change...
Call me a Luddite if you will, but the post-human future is upon us!