View allAll Photos Tagged Testing.
just testing how to organize a sketch book and make it look dirty and battered...all the ilustrations are mine!
please leave your comment or critic!or anything you want!
i love the feedback!
A base test shot on my new Canon 5D Mark II at 1600 ISO using a Canon f/2.8L 24-70mm lens @70mm in RAW format.
Note on the 5D2 shots: I noticed I had the exposure adjusted downward, so that's why they appear a bit darker than the 400D. The 400D also had its exposure boosted upwards. Whoops!
Testing a new pattern design. I'm still pretty new to repeating patterns, this one is experimenting with diamonds.
VERY bright (in fact I may dimm them later)
There are 16 LEDs behind the wheel and 8 LEDs for the buttons and indicator lights.
NOTE: This is just a temporary solution, not the final install
Agrandando la familia
Texto en islandés :"hubiere un hacha aquÃ, los ladrones serÃan disuadidos y castigados"
criticas, sugerencias, comentarios
Test print in low quality. I've made this test of my doll head's lid to check the size and some details.
I've been curious--okay, obsessed--about how my very cool looking little Graflex camera performs after fifty-odd years. Here's what make this camera so interesting:
- You focus this camera by pushing the two buttons on either side of the lens.
- The shutter release isn't the usual pushbutton, but a lever on the front of the camera.
- Beautifully crafted Rodenstock lens.
So, how did it perform? To be honest, it had its quirks. The pushbutton focusing is great when you need to rack out to infinity--or closest focus--in a hurry. But actually focusing on anything in between was a bit fiddly, tending to overshoot a lot. And the shutter release required a very long stroke to work, causing the camera to rotate a bit during some shots. Still, I think the focus and shutter release innovations on this camera might have worked well with a bit more refinement.
- Graflex Graphic 35 camera with Rodenstock 50mm f3.5 lens.
- Kodak Ektachrome 100 VC transparency film.
- Scan by North Coast Photographic Services.
My kids play-testing my new entry to LEGO Ideas. Please support here: ideas.lego.com/projects/2384769b-f69c-401e-a7a3-840e96ab7156
Testing out a recent M2 purchase.
Leica M2
Voigtlander Nokton Classic 35mm f/1.4
Kodak TMax 400 TMY-2
Kodak HC-110 Dilution B
No (merited) cold beer in the house but that nice Mr Waitrose had six packs of "Seriously Creamy Triple Chocolate cones with double cream reduced to less than half price. And 8 fluid oz pots of double cream for ten pence. Justy need a side order of chips and I've got the makings of a celebratory meal.
Oh, and an MoT test pass cerificate for the DS but with a sheet and a bit of (deserved) advisories. Nay matter, a bijou planette is in place.
A pleasant little jaunt around the UBC Research Forest the other week. Towards the end of the loop hikes you come to the test area where various treatments are tested for weathering resistance. Decking, roofing shingles and posts in the ground were all to be seen.
Uploaded on 05-26-2019
Yesterday's posted photo was stuck in virtual world with only 16 views for the entire day. Comment and faves weren't showing correctly from as much as I could figured out. This is a test photo to see if this one does better...
Ahh, Flickr, faves and comments aren't showing up and view count seems to be off. Keep working.
I stand corrected on my previous opinion of Panasonics JPEG engine. Check the original of this image. Left is JPEG out of
camera, right is RAW corrected for sharpness and noise reduction in LR. Notice the difference. The JPEG would be totally useless for print. The right is acceptable considering it was shot at 6400 ISO, 250mm hand-held at 1/125 second.
I've come to the conclusion that my problem lies with the noise and sharpness corrections in camera. I'll have to see if there is not some way to turn those completely off.
Testing out my new camera remote...fun times are heading this way. This is also a great example of "what I wear" - hey look, there's another cardigan.
A Cupcake Central cupcake tasting event where VIP Guests were invited to taste test and critique our new cupcake flavours and designs as part of our rebranding and launch of our first flagship Cupcake Central storefront.
I have been making armor for a while. Today after putting together some of the scales, I had to test them against impact of a sharp object with high impact. The throwing axes used, weigh 2 pounds 4 ounces, or one Kilogram each. It took a few tries to hit the armor but after I had, I finally managed to break the scales with the tip of the throwing axes.
While the backing used for the impact test does not simulate real impact from a claw, or tooth, it does give a fair idea that it would significantly slow the force of a sharp object trying to pierce what is behind it.
The thread used for this test is a low test weight cotton twine, and held up as well as could be expected for the circumstances.
The velocity of the average throw is about 25 to 30 feet per second (time from thrown axe leaving my hand until impact at target) makes it about 17-24.45 Mph
I am not well versed in physics, but can guess that as the points on the axe are less than 1/4 inch across, with 2 plus pounds of force each behind them divided out between them, there is over a pound of weight hitting the scales. there is little to no give of the backing as it is wood, and each of the rounds weighs about 80 pounds. they did rock back about an inch when they were hit. the blades bit in about 2 inches in the unprotected area, and about 1/4 to one half inch into the armor. Suffice to say, I think this will stop light grazing damage, but will not stop serious point impact. I expect broken bones, or at the least serious bruising from impact, but less probability for large open cuts from a slash.
Later tests with different impacts will be forthcoming, but for the moment, this is the hardest impact testing that would show the worth of what I have been working on.
Further, of the 4 sets of armor made, only one withstood the impact and did not break. it had double layers of scales and the twine holding it snapped on impact. the smaller scales experienced the similar damage with no scales being visibly damaged, but the twine sheered and all the scales flew apart.
EMPIRE TEST - IMO : 1181839
Built 1922, by J Cockerill SA, Hoboken, Belgium (Yard No. 563) as THYSVILLE
GRT : 8176 / DWT : ??
Overall Length : 133.8 metres x Beam 17.4 metres.
Machinery : 2 Screw each driven by a Quadruple-Expansion Steam Engine
Speed : 14.0 knots
History POR = Port of Registry
1922: THYSVILLE : Cie Belge Maritime du Congo SA : POR Antwerp
1931: THYSVILLE : Cie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) SA : POR Antwerp
1947: EMPIRE TEST : British Govt : MOWT, London [managed by Lamport & Holt Line] : POR London
1953 : Broken up at Faslane by Metal Industries.
EMPIRE TEST photographed between 1947-53.
Ship Details : Miramar - May 2020