View allAll Photos Tagged Testing.
Or@ngepeel's turn to try to break into the by now legendary Olympus diptych camera... not to be defeated he tries the "phone a friend" option, but to no avail. Laura Mary looks on with little hope that her seemingly simple quest will bear fruit. Martin Homer seems to be having camera troubles of his own.
went to a friend's tow pound to do some long exposure tests at night:
shot jpg, full resolution posted @ iso 25600 - no in camera noise processing
there is a REMARKABLE difference with high ISO noise processing set to ON.
this original size
farm4.static.flickr.com/3295/3070341395_a5ba455cb0_o.jpg
other ISO settings of the same shot....
The 120 film won't be back in my hands for a little while, so I got some FP-100C to put in the Polaroid back for the new RZ67!
Yes, the photo itself is not particularly exciting.
I thought I'd give a demo of the standard vignette on the new 16-35 F4 IS L. In direct comparison to the 17-40 L which I also have, the vignette seems to be worse at first glance (back of camera) on the newer lens. However, once on screen, you can see that the newer lens is no worse at the corners than the old, and a big improvement towards the middle.
Once Lightroom releases a lens correction profile for the 16-35 F4 IS L, it should be great, as the new glass is definitely sharper, and the IS is massively useful in my opinion.
On a telephoto with IS, you're looking to get a shot with your aperture wide open, and the IS allows you to shoot at 1/30-1/100th all day. The huge benefit with IS on a wide angle for me, is that now, even though I could always hand hold at 1/15th, I can now crank up my aperture and get an even sharper image.
Overall thoroughly happy with my new glass... anyone want to buy a well loved Canon 17-40mm F4 L ?! hehe.
Rolleiflex 2.8F 80mm Zeiss Planar
Kodak Tri-X 400 / D-76 / 9.75m @ 20C
First test shot with the Rolleiflex :)
Does this mean the circuit board was tested in January 2014?
The label on the cabinet says the amp was made July 29, 2014. Since it is an assembly line, maybe it was finally assembled on 7/29/2014 but the circuit board was assembled and tested in January of 2014. Or I just don't understand the markings!
Test roll 1 from the Canon EOS 3. There's a bit of a learning curve, but all in all, I'm happy with the purchase. My portraits from this roll turned out the best.
There does seem to be a tendency to overexpose, which I'll need to work on.
Canon EOS 3
Lens unknown (not sure which one I had on)
Kodak Portra 400
Scanned by Englewood Camera
© Web-Betty: digital heart, analog soul
I've never met someone like this.
I told her in all honesty, "Your as crazy as I am. I love you!" :)
Seriously though, as the the temperature steadily dropped to 25 F, the fire had to be maintained. We opened the stone fire ring towards ourselves to radiate heat a bit lower. Sparks and embers kept us on constant alert.
Roughly every fifty minutes or less we had to refeed the fire...
In the bottom of my pack I had a plastic garbage bag I cut open to keep us from the dampness of the ground. I broke open my first aid kit and found an emergency blanket.
I have quite a bit to say about that, but let me tell you, if you're staking your life on a $3.99 piece of aluminized mylar...I hope you have your affairs in order.
granted we went in with more than the average day hiker. But there were a number of things that would have added virtually unnoticeable weight and would have made this a backyard experience.
We entered this willingly, without a doubt. But, our way out was potentially more dangerous than staying due to the terrain and hypothermia. if we had gotten wet, I don't want to think what the night would have been like.
We were fatigued from lack of sleep and the body aches were primarily from the shiver response. I'm still surprised that I'm still sore.
We've relished the feeling of toughing out a potential threat scenario. This was merely training and a hard lesson. Would we do it again? With a bit more finesse yes.
Preferably with sleeping bags and a tent and Dear Lord some coffee :)
I've always been taught that the key to survival in any situation is what's between your ears. It's not just knowledge, it's some key characteristics that guide your steps.
Operation Musketeer (sticker misprinted with Charioteer)
GASCON
November 14, 1986
20 to 150 kilotons
US Nuclear Test #988
I chose this scene for all of the debris and detail in the construction. Zoom in on all of it. Check out the tiles on the roof, then scan down to the windows and dumpsters. Finally move towards the front of the scene where the debris is and cardboard box. Oh, and if you look to the left you'll see the high school, and in front of it, mounds of dirt with a lot of detail.
Sigma DP2M
A Mode
1/320 sec
F/10
ISO 100
just testing how to organize a sketch book and make it look dirty and battered...all the ilustrations are mine!
please leave your comment or critic!or anything you want!
i love the feedback!
A base test shot on my new Canon 5D Mark II at 1600 ISO using a Canon f/2.8L 24-70mm lens @70mm in RAW format.
Note on the 5D2 shots: I noticed I had the exposure adjusted downward, so that's why they appear a bit darker than the 400D. The 400D also had its exposure boosted upwards. Whoops!
Testing a new pattern design. I'm still pretty new to repeating patterns, this one is experimenting with diamonds.
Mixed crystal system Taurine, propyl gallate, diphenhydramine. Photo taken with Zeiss PM1 scope 16x plan phase 2 objective and Canon EOS 60D camera equipped with Zeiss 47 60 10 intermediate tube and Leitz 4x projection lens. Polarized Light image.
Test print in low quality. I've made this test of my doll head's lid to check the size and some details.
My kids play-testing my new entry to LEGO Ideas. Please support here: ideas.lego.com/projects/2384769b-f69c-401e-a7a3-840e96ab7156
ISO 1600, f4.5, 1/50, 40 mm, auto white balance
Nikkor AF-S DX 18-105/3.5 - 5.6 G ED VR
no image editing. picture directly out of cam!
I wanted to test the noise behavior with high iso.
I wrote an article about the test. Please check here for German speakers: www.doreen.es/2008/09/09/nikon-d90-test/
PS: Sorry I didn't care about image details // Bitte nicht auf Bildausschnitte achten, hab ich auch nicht gemacht ;)