View allAll Photos Tagged SX2
1º lugar na classificatória da SX2.
Curitiba - PR.
Piloto: Leandro Silva
Foto de Pamela Machado para FCM - Federação Catarinense de Motociclismo.
Me with Steph. I look so tired.... I had a really bad tiring week, totally exausted from lack of sleep, last week at work, stress from various things, visa issues etc........
SX2. jace Owen (USA) Kawasaki Bud Racing
#SXPARIS2018 #supercross2018 #SX1 #NikonD4 Suivez moi sur Facebook
Old shot from that roll of Coles Reliance 400 where everything came out green. Have tried to subdue the colours a bit here.
SX2 - FINALE - #773 THOMAS DO – FRANCE – SUZUKI JPM #supercrossdeparis #sxp #race #racing #paris #france #2019 #novembre #parisladefensearena #parisladefense #picoftheday #lifestyle #top #showtime #rider #letsgo #letsplay #king #kingofparis #showtime #show #fire #monstergirls #monsterenergy #race #riders #fmx #sxparis2019 #NikonD5
Better get this sucker before it goes to seed. Too bad, my camera does not have a weed killer mode. I can just set it to that mode, click, zap! Maybe the next generation SX2 will. Have a happy weekend everyone!
This flower of the weed was shot with my Canon PowerShot SX1 IS with the Raynox DCR-250 lens attached.
For my other shots taken with the Raynox DCR-250 lens, click here.
Another one using Verm's Sigma 12-24. Think I may need to get one for myself, but the current model looks to be a castrated version with no aperture ring. Anybody know anywhere that sells the old model?
So I bought one of those overpriced Eximus Wide & Slim crappycams. It's pretty much a Vivitar Ultra Wide & Slim (I've seen it described as a clone of the viv, but since Vivitar don't manufacture stuff themselves I reckon the people distributing these just bought a bunch from the same supplier that Vivitar did, rather than re-engineering a piece of plasticky crap).
In terms of build and image quality, it's about as good as, or slightly worse than, plenty of other crappycams that I've paid 2 or 3 bucks for. But it does have that 22mm lens. And you can't get the Vivitar UWS cheaply these days anyway.
I didn't add the green cast. Since I've gotten similar colours in the same spot with the Holga 135BC and different film, I'm thinking it's something to do with the light in this location hitting a plastic lens. Either that or crappy profiles on the scanner.
RA: 04h 03m 18.00s, Dec: +36° 25′ 18.0″
The California Nebula (NGC 1499/Sh2-220) is an emission nebula located in the constellation Perseus, lying at a distance of about 1,000 light years from Earth. It was discovered by E. E. Barnard in 1884.
OTA: 135 mm f/3.5 Samyang Lens
(iTelescope T80, Entre Encinas y Estrellas, Spain)
Camera: ZWO ASI-1600MM-Pro
Mount: Paramount MyT
Guiding: ZWO 30 F/4 guidescope with Loadstar SX2
Total integration time: 6 hr 15 min
25 x 300 sec SII (bin x1) mapped to RED channel
30 x 300 sec Ha (bin x1) mapped to GREEN channel
20 x 300 sec OIII (bin x1) mapped to BLUE channel
Data acquisition: 28/09/2023 - 10/10/2023 (iTelescope)
Calibration: iTelescope
Alignment & stacking: PixInsight
Post-processing: Photoshop
Still have two rolls left from the batch of CR400 that gave me the green pics. Wondering whether to shoot them in a proper camera or a crappycam, or both.
Want to use this photo? See my pimp.
Shot in the same spot as the previous photo. This is why I paid the ridiculous idiot-tax for the Eximus 22mm.
Had an 0.5x wide converter for digicams lying around that I'd picked up dirt-cheap from a closing-down sale at this dodgy camera joint in Sydney. Works out OK on the Eximus, better than the dodgy fisheye accessories they sell for them. And if you can tolerate the horrendously distorted edges, it's 11mm (about 7.5mm for you cropped DSLR people) in a pocket camera.