View allAll Photos Tagged Rejection
Oct.26, 2018: Mount Precipice, also known as Mount of Precipitation, Mount of the Leap of the Lord and Mount Kedumim is located just outside the southern edge of Nazareth, 2.0 km southwest of the modern city center.
It is believed by some to be the site of the Rejection of Jesus described in the Gospel of Luke.: ..."Then He said, "Assuredly, I say to you, no prophet is accepted in his own country. But I tell you truly, many widows were in Israel in the days of Elijah, when the heaven was shut up three years and six months, and there was a great famine throughout all the land; but to none of them was Elijah sent except to Zarephath, in the region of Sidon, to a woman who was a widow. And many lepers were in Israel in the time of Elisha the prophet, and none of them was cleansed except Naaman the Syrian." So all those in the synagogue, when they heard these things, were filled with wrath, and rose up and thrust Him out of the city; and they led Him to the brow of the hill on which their city was built, that they might throw Him down over the cliff. Then passing through the midst of them, He went His way. (Luke 4:14-30)
.
High Weightage for Viva Marks is a STRUCTURAL Bhagwati, Y.V. Chandrachud (CJI), V.R. Krishnaiyer, Syed.
Murtaza Fazal Ali, A.D. Koshal) had clearly said:.
Problem, Which Needs a STRUCTURAL Solution.
We are of the view that, under the existing.
The high weightage of viva marks leaves a huge space for circumstances, allocation of more than 15% of.
subjective biases, prejudices and discretion - though we have the total marks for the oral interview would be.
a written exam, in effect viva often alone decides the selection arbitrary and unreasonable and would be liable.
or rejection of a candidate! This is a subversion of the very to be struck down as constitutionally invalid".
principle that Written and Viva should TOGETHER judge the.
ability of the student. The issue at hand is a STRUCTURAL Again in 2011, the Supreme Court in a viva related case.
problem: where 30% weightage in viva has reduced written of ICAR, UPHELD the validity of this 1980 verdict in yet.
exam as a mere qualifier and the final selection CAN BE another judgement. Why then is JNU continuing with this.
MADE TO DEPEND on viva marking alone. The available gross violations?.
data clearly shows high degree of discretion and consequent.
discrimination, whereby good performances in the written It is high time that JNU recognises the distortion that.
exam are washed away by the viva marking. has crept into the selection process and accept the.
legitimate of demand of the student community to reduce.
It is all too obvious in category-based analysis. But it is the existing 30% weightage of the viva-voce as per the.
ALSO important to realise that high weightage of viva directives of the Supreme Court to 10-15%. This step will.
marks leaves a huge space open for arbitrary exercise of go a long way in ensuring a more level playing field for.
discretion and subjective biases that can affect ANY disadvantaged students and reduce space for subjective.
STUDENT, irrespective of social category. anomalies to affect the outcome for all the candidates..
.
Today, it has become impossible for anyone to deny the Stop Delinking the Integrated BA/MA What does this data show us? Clearly, several departments in the Muslim community. Literacy amongst Muslims (59.1%).
discrimination in the viva voce: the facts are too telling. are NOT filling the AVAILABLE seats. If it were just a question is substantially lower than the average literacy rate in India.
However, we are still seeing massive reluctance from Programme in SLL&CS, Address High Drop-out Rates: of screening out the `disinterested' students from these (64.8%); while 7% of the total population in India aged 20 years.
some sections to give up the huge discretionary space Resist Administration's New "Rules" and Policies to programmes and keeping those who are `interested', then and above are graduates or hold diplomas, this figure is ONLY.
and powers that the 30% viva weightage provides. And Screen and Eliminate! why is there such pervasive disinterest among students to 4% amongst Muslims; moreover, the gap increases as the level.
so, we are being told, that `measures' will be taken to ensure join M.A. and M.Phil-Ph.D programmes where open of education increases. The facts offered by Sachar.
that such discrepancies do not occur in future, within the JNU's foreign language programmes have been designed entrance exams are conducted? Committee are revealing enough:.
existing high weightage. Such responses ignore the systemic/ very differently from Foreign language training courses.
structural issues that are being pointed out. offered elsewhere in the country. Right from the beginning, The exam system is clearly NOT going to ensure that enough.
JNU's foreign language programme was designed not students take admission in JNU to make full use of our academic.
Moreover, we are hearing arguments that `it does not matter just to teach speaking, reading and writing skills but capacity..
if reserved category students are given poor marks, since ALSO to foster an atmosphere conducive to higher.
even if they do relatively badly, the existence of reservation learning and research. However, most unfortunately, we.
means that they are competing among themselves.' are increasingly witnessing a situation where this goal of.
JNU's foreign language programme is being undermined..
Firstly, this is an obviously dangerous Brahminical This year, the integrated nature of the BA/MA programme.
argument that implies that a reserved category offered in SL was dismantled unilaterally, at a time when.
student can only aspire for a reserved category seat! there was no JNUSU. The opinion of the student community.
was never considered in taking this important decision..
.
Secondly, such an argument, has a deeper and wider What exactly is the `logic' being offered to dismantle a policy.
.
practical implication. Let's see how : A reserved that has been in place for several years now? We are being.
.
category student, who based on his or her or told that some `screening' is necessary to ensure that only.
.
performance, could get a general category seat is `serious' students enter the MA programme!.
.
deliberately pushed down to occupy a reserved The question is: Why is it that an additional exam is now High Drop-out Rates : Moreover, the alarmingly high drop- In JNU too, the representation of Muslims is far from.
category seat. In this process, reserved category deemed `necessary' to evaluate the so-called `seriousness' out rate continues to be a source of concern. Let us have a encouraging. The TOTAL representation of Muslims in the.
seats are exhausted and automatically other of students? Isn't the 3-year CGPA, calculated on the basis look at the data for the Japanese centre (obtained through RTIs). student community comes to a mere 14.5%, only slightly.
reserved category students are pushed out. So, of extensive evaluation over a long period not more reliable? What does this data show us? In 2007-08 for instance, nearly higher than the national average for representation in higher.
even if the quota is filled, the process of deliberate Moreover, let us have a look at some data on open 43% students were forced to drop out, and another 21.4% were education. However, if one were to exclude CIL, CAAS.
exclusion based on ideologically biased notions of admissions of the MA and MPhil entrance exams in the forced to take an additional year to complete the BA programme. and CPCAS (where there is a substantial representation of.
`merit' has not come to an end. foreign language departments in SLL&CS. Take the trend This trend exists in several centres, where several students Muslims), the total representation of Muslims in JNU.
every year are forced to leave JNU because we tell them they would be only 7.9%. In SL, representation of Muslims is.
To test this, using the admission data of the 2011-12 academic for ALL the foreign language centres in last 3 years: are "unable to cope"! 27% - but if one were to exclude Hindi, Urdu, Arabic and.
Persian centres (where there is substantial representation of.
year, the previous JNUSU did a hypothetical exercise, by In the MA programme through direct entrance Instead of addressing such serious concerns, where Muslims), the proportion comes down to just 6.9%! In SSS,.
students are being forced to drop out, JNU seems to be the representation of Muslims is 9.4%, and in SIS it is 7.7%..
reducing the weightage of viva marks to 0% and 15%, and In 2009-10, out of 75 seats intake, only 43 students devising a mechanism (like delinking the BA and MA In all the science schools and SAA, CSLG, the proportion.
programmes) wherein even fewer students will take of Muslims is 7%. Clearly, JNU as an institution has to take.
calculated the marks obtained by each student as a factor of joined. admission in the MA/MPhil programmes in foreign proactive steps to remove this systemic marginalisation and.
languages. Can this be allowed? Is this in keeping with JNU's underrepresentation through a holistic package, including.
the marks obtained by them in the 70/30 system.In RCA/SIS In 2010-11, out of 85 seats intake, only 54 students inclusive ethos? Clearly NO. reservations and deprivation points. It is in this context,.
JNU must introduce 5 Deprivation points for Muslims in.
for instance, 4 more SC, 1 more ST, and 2 more OBC category joined. Ensuring Social Inclusion : 5 Deprivation its admission- a demand raised by JNUSU and which has.
Points for Muslim Students in JNU Admissions been passed by the School GBMs..
students would theoretically get admission if the viva marks In 2011-12, out of 88 seats intake, only 51 students.
In late 2006, the Sachar Committee submitted its report on the.
weightage was reduced to 0%. Similar such results have been joined. social, economic and educational status of Muslims in India..
This report unequivocally pointed out the poor status of education 3.
submitted in the note to the viva committee.If these trends In the M. Phil programme, for which also there is direct.
.
were to be reflected in a sizable number of centres, the list of entrance exam,.
.
selected candidates could change substantially. In 2009-10, out of 94 seats intake, only 65 students.
.
High Viva Weightage: Legally Untenable joined..
In 2010-11, out of 104 seats intake, only 81 students.
Way back in November 1980, a 5- Judge Constitution Bench.
of the Supreme Court comprising legal luminaries like P.N. joined..
In 2011-12, out of 117 seats intake, only students 66.
.
2 joined..
..
The sun rejects your request to live my dear flower... and the jazz band rejected my request to express.
Edit Note (Dec 23.2005): This was the day that I found out i got rejected from the jazz band... that was a hard day, but not as hard as the days that I've been having now, that's why this portrait feels much personal after things that I've been through recently, which may seem trivial to another person, but everyone has their problems, to each their own.
Bourbon and beer, 4:30 in the afternoon on a Tuesday, with my pal Sue. We drank and edited Sue's academic vitae so that she will get a kick ass job at a R1 university which means she'll soon be leaving me which means I'll soon be drinking bourbon alone at 4:30 on a Tuesday which feels more like a rejection than a salve.
Jose Mourinho – The former Manchester United boss also insisted he won’t speak out on the end of his Old Trafford reign.
Jose Mourinho insists he has “no intention” of returning to management in Portugal.
The 55-year-old has been linked with the manager’s...
www.palbrosinfotainment.com/jose-mourinho-fired-up-on-new...