View allAll Photos Tagged Reimbursement

Southern Company only building nukes because they re not paying, we are --Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

 

Pictures by for Lowndes Area Knowledge Exchange (LAKE), Valdosta, Lowndes County, Georgia, .

 

www.l-a-k-e.org/blog/2013/06/southern-company-only-buildi...

Governor Abercrombie signed the following bills:

 

House Bill 2052 (Relating to Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) increases access to Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) by updating references from “physicians orders for life-sustaining treatment” to “provider orders for life-sustaining treatment.” The measure also expands health care provider signatory authority to include advance practice registered nurses and corrects inconsistencies of terms describing who may sign a POLST form on behalf of a patient.

 

House Bill 1616 (Relating to Health Planning) adds to the Hawaii State Planning Act’s objectives and policies for health, the identification of social determinants of health and prioritization of programs, services, interventions, and activities that address identified social determinants of health to improve Native Hawaiian health in accordance with federal law and reduce health disparities of disproportionately affected demographics.

 

House Bill 1723 (Relating to Psychiatric Facilities) amends the notice requirements for the discharge of an involuntary patient committed pursuant to legal proceeding involving fitness to proceed and requires the family court to conduct a timely hearing prior to the termination of a standing commitment order.

 

House Bill 2320 (Relating to Health) establishes health equity as a goal for the DOH and requires the DOH to consider social determinants of health in assessing health needs in the state. The measure is known as “Loretta’s Law” for the late DOH Director Loretta Fuddy, who was passionate proponent.

 

House Bill 2581 (Relating to Insurance) establishes the State Innovation Waiver Task Force and requires the task force to submit two interim reports and a final report to the legislature.

 

Senate Bill 2469 (Relating to Telehealth) requires equivalent reimbursement for services, including behavioral health services, provided through telehealth as for the same services provided via face-to-face contact between a health care provider and a patient. The measure also clarifies that health care providers for purposes of telehealth include primary care providers, mental health providers, oral health providers, physicians and osteopathic physicians, advanced practice registered nurses, psychologists, and dentists. For consistency purposes, the bill changes statutory references of “telemedicine” to “telehealth.”

 

House Bill 2400 (Relating to Temporary Disability Benefits) provides temporary disability benefits to employees who suffer disabilities as a result of donating organs.

 

Senate Bill 1233 (Relating to Leaves of Absence) requires certain private employers to allow employees to take leaves of absence for organ, bone marrow, or peripheral blood stem cell donation. Unused sick leave, vacation, or paid time off, or unpaid time off, may be used for these leaves of absence. The measure also requires employers to restore an employee returning from leave to the same or equivalent position and establishes a private right of action for employees seeking enforcement of provisions.

Date: April 6 2017

Location: Holocaust Museum (Yad Vasjem) in Jerusalem, Israel

 

This photo was taken in the Garden of the Righteous in front of the Holocaust Museum in Jerusalem.

 

*Righteous Among the Nations:

 

One of Yad Vashem's tasks is to honor non-Jews (like Oskar Schindler) who risked their lives, liberty or positions to save Jews during the Holocaust. To this end a special independent Commission, headed by a retired Supreme Court Justice, was established. The commission members, including historians, public figures, lawyers and Holocaust survivors, examine and evaluate each case according to a well-defined set of criteria and regulations. The Righteous receive a certificate of honor and a medal and their names are commemorated in the Garden of the Righteous Among the Nations, on the Mount of Remembrance, Yad Vashem. This is an ongoing project that will continue for as long as there are valid requests, substantiated by testimonies or documentation.

 

*Oskar Schindler (28 April 1908 – 9 October 1974) was a German industrialist, spy, and member of the Nazi Party who is credited with saving the lives of 1,200 Jews during the Holocaust by employing them in his enamelware and ammunitions factories, which were located in occupied Poland and the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia. He is the subject of the 1982 novel Schindler's Ark, and the subsequent 1993 film Schindler's List, which reflected his life as an opportunist initially motivated by profit who came to show extraordinary initiative, tenacity and dedication to save the lives of his Jewish employees.

 

Schindler grew up in Zwittau, Moravia, and worked in several trades until he joined the Abwehr, the intelligence service of Nazi Germany, in 1936. He joined the Nazi Party in 1939. Prior to the German occupation of Czechoslovakia in 1938, he collected information on railways and troop movements for the German government. He was arrested for espionage by the Czech government but was released under the terms of the Munich Agreement in 1938. Schindler continued to collect information for the Nazis, working in Poland in 1939 before the invasion of Poland at the start of World War II.

 

In 1939, Schindler acquired an enamelware factory in Kraków, Poland, which employed about 1,750 workers, of whom 1,000 were Jews at the factory's peak in 1944. His Abwehr connections helped Schindler to protect his Jewish workers from deportation and death in the Nazi concentration camps. As time went on, Schindler had to give Nazi officials ever larger bribes and gifts of luxury items obtainable only on the black market to keep his workers safe.

 

By July 1944, Germany was losing the war; the SS began closing down the easternmost concentration camps and deporting the remaining prisoners westward. Many were killed in Auschwitz and Gross-Rosen concentration camp. Schindler convinced SS-Hauptsturmführer Amon Göth, commandant of the nearby Kraków-Płaszów concentration camp, to allow him to move his factory to Brünnlitz in the Sudetenland, thus sparing his workers from almost certain death in the gas chambers. Using names provided by Jewish Ghetto Police officer Marcel Goldberg, Göth's secretary Mietek Pemper compiled and typed the list of 1,200 Jews who travelled to Brünnlitz in October 1944. Schindler continued to bribe SS officials to prevent the execution of his workers until the end of World War II in Europe in May 1945, by which time he had spent his entire fortune on bribes and black-market purchases of supplies for his workers.

 

Schindler moved to West Germany after the war, where he was supported by assistance payments from Jewish relief organisations. After receiving a partial reimbursement for his wartime expenses, he moved with his wife, Emilie, to Argentina, where they took up farming. When he went bankrupt in 1958, Schindler left his wife and returned to Germany, where he failed at several business ventures and relied on financial support from Schindlerjuden ("Schindler Jews") – the people whose lives he had saved during the war. He was named Righteous Among the Nations by the Israeli government in 1963. He died on 9 October 1974 in Hildesheim, Germany, and was buried in Jerusalem on Mount Zion, the only member of the Nazi Party to be honoured in this way.

 

Great Respect for this WWII Hero, Mr. Oskar Schindler.

Rest in Peace.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Follow me on Flickr if you like to stay updated on my Travel Photos and more! If you also love Travel videos, check my Youtube Travel Channel and Subscribe ;-)

www.youtube.com/channel/UCBADJ8Eydo8YwWtglK9dKEg

 

I'm the owner of all my photos © All Rights Reserved.

To use my photos, please contact me on: jerrytahaproductions@gmail.com

Using my photos without my permission is forbidden and violates Copyright ©

 

Lifetime Dream # 31 of my list of 155: I will finish my college degree, in the field of Business Management. I will finish my courses at Texas State or at the University of Phoenix. I will have a large celebration upon the day that I finish my degree and walk the stage to pick up my diploma.

 

I spent 5 years at Texas State (it was Southwest Texas State University back then) as a Physics and Mathematics major. I quit going for a few reasons, but I remember when I told my parents that I was “taking a break” before finishing, that I would one day complete what I had started. After my divorce, well… it was hard being on a single income, and then it was one reason after another.

 

My employer, United Healthcare, like many other employers offers tuition reimbursement programs, but with the rising costs of education- they fall short. In 2010 they started a program in San Antonio where the top-performing employees could go back to school at no cost through the University of Phoenix. United Healthcare pays 100% of the costs, and we have to agree to stay with the company for 3 years after graduation. It’s an amazing gesture, and truly it instills a lot of loyalty and pride in the workplace.

 

The degree I’m pursuing is in Business Management; I plan to specialize my degree and get my Master’s degree- perhaps even my doctorate. I just want to be called Dr. so and so… (kidding- I’m not that egotistical!). Everything is online with the University of Phoenix, so that was a bit of a change. Because I was a Math and Physics major, I don’t have to take any math; everyone in my cohort hates me for that!

 

Pictured is my new Sony Vaio laptop. I delayed getting a new one for a while now, but with more and more photo editing and music recording coming up, it was much needed. I love so much about this laptop that I wouldn’t know where to start. Back-lit keys, super-fast processor, high-definition screen… the list goes on!

 

I kind of hate that my degree plan is spread out, but in some ways it’s nice. My classes are 5 weeks long, I get to take 2 in a row then have a 1 course break; 10 weeks on then 5 weeks off. I really can’t complain because most others have little or no breaks. Come 2013, I will be super happy to be done with the program… I will definitely be taking a nice long vacation after that!!!

 

The astronaut transfer van, known as the Astrovan during the Space Shuttle era, was a NASA vehicle used at the Kennedy Space Center to transport astronauts from the Operations and Checkout Building to the launch pad before a mission and for launch dress rehearsals, and back to the Operations and Checkout Building following a shuttle landing.

 

According to driver Ronnie King, the early shuttle astronauts liked the history-filled vehicle, even if it was somewhat old, and even argued against upgrading the vehicle. "We were staged to get a new one," King said, and added that word came that the rookie astronauts wanted to keep the vehicle that was a tradition of the astronauts who traveled those nine miles to the pad before them.

 

During the twenty-minute drive to the launch pad for shuttle launches, the Astrovan usually stopped at least once along the way. An astronaut rode with the crew and was let off near the Vehicle Assembly Building to board the Shuttle Training Aircraft and assess local weather conditions. Senior NASA managers occasionally rode along as well, and were dropped off at the Launch Control Center.

 

During Project Mercury a modified semi truck and trailer was used to transport astronauts to the launch pads LC-5 and LC-14.

During Project Gemini a fleet of converted delivery vans were used to transport astronauts to the launch pad LC-19.

A modified Clark-Cortez motorhome was used to transport Apollo-era crews to the launch pad, beginning with Apollo 7 in 1967 and continuing through the Apollo–Soyuz launch in 1975. This vehicle remained in use through STS-6, and is now on display at the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex's Apollo/Saturn V Center.

An Itasca Suncruiser M-22RB was used to transport the STS-7 and STS-8 astronauts to the launch pad, as the size of shuttle crews had increased.

A modified 1983 Airstream Excella motorhome, popularly known as the Astrovan, was used from STS-9 through the final Space Shuttle mission (STS-135), and is also on display at the KSC Visitor Center.

On October 21, 2019, the Boeing Company and Airstream announced Astrovan II, a modified Airstream Atlas (with a Mercedes-Benz Sprinter chassis) touring coach to carry Boeing commercial crew astronauts to the launch pad where they will board the CST-100 Starliner on their way to the International Space Station. Astrovan II has seating for up to eight (including the driver), and was built at Airstream's Jackson Center, Ohio production facility.

SpaceX does not use a van to transport astronauts for the SpaceX Dragon 2 missions, instead using a set of specially made Tesla Model X cars.

On April 13, 2022, NASA announced that Canoo Technologies Inc would build three new crew transportation vehicles designed to take the fully suited astronauts, their support team, and their equipment on the nine-mile stretch of road from the Neil Armstrong Operations and Checkout Building to the launch pad for the Artemis program.

In Russia and China cosmonauts and taikonauts have always relied on a bus to take them to the Launch Pad.

 

The John F. Kennedy Space Center (KSC, originally known as the NASA Launch Operations Center), located on Merritt Island, Florida, is one of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) ten field centers. Since December 1968, KSC has been NASA's primary launch center of American spaceflight, research, and technology. Launch operations for the Apollo, Skylab and Space Shuttle programs were carried out from Kennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39 and managed by KSC. Located on the east coast of Florida, KSC is adjacent to Cape Canaveral Space Force Station (CCSFS). The management of the two entities work very closely together, share resources and operate facilities on each other's property.

 

Though the first Apollo flights and all Project Mercury and Project Gemini flights took off from the then-Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, the launches were managed by KSC and its previous organization, the Launch Operations Directorate. Starting with the fourth Gemini mission, the NASA launch control center in Florida (Mercury Control Center, later the Launch Control Center) began handing off control of the vehicle to the Mission Control Center in Houston, shortly after liftoff; in prior missions it held control throughout the entire mission.

 

Additionally, the center manages launch of robotic and commercial crew missions and researches food production and in-situ resource utilization for off-Earth exploration. Since 2010, the center has worked to become a multi-user spaceport through industry partnerships, even adding a new launch pad (LC-39C) in 2015.

 

There are about 700 facilities and buildings grouped throughout the center's 144,000 acres (580 km2). Among the unique facilities at KSC are the 525-foot (160 m) tall Vehicle Assembly Building for stacking NASA's largest rockets, the Launch Control Center, which conducts space launches at KSC, the Operations and Checkout Building, which houses the astronauts dormitories and suit-up area, a Space Station factory, and a 3-mile (4.8 km) long Shuttle Landing Facility. There is also a Visitor Complex on site that is open to the public.

 

Since 1949, the military had been performing launch operations at what would become Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. In December 1959, the Department of Defense transferred 5,000 personnel and the Missile Firing Laboratory to NASA to become the Launch Operations Directorate under NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.

 

President John F. Kennedy's 1961 goal of a crewed lunar landing by 1970 required an expansion of launch operations. On July 1, 1962, the Launch Operations Directorate was separated from MSFC to become the Launch Operations Center (LOC). Also, Cape Canaveral was inadequate to host the new launch facility design required for the mammoth 363-foot (111 m) tall, 7,500,000-pound-force (33,000 kN) thrust Saturn V rocket, which would be assembled vertically in a large hangar and transported on a mobile platform to one of several launch pads. Therefore, the decision was made to build a new LOC site located adjacent to Cape Canaveral on Merritt Island.

 

NASA began land acquisition in 1962, buying title to 131 square miles (340 km2) and negotiating with the state of Florida for an additional 87 square miles (230 km2). The major buildings in KSC's Industrial Area were designed by architect Charles Luckman. Construction began in November 1962, and Kennedy visited the site twice in 1962, and again just a week before his assassination on November 22, 1963.

 

On November 29, 1963, the facility was named by President Lyndon B. Johnson under Executive Order 11129. Johnson's order joined both the civilian LOC and the military Cape Canaveral station ("the facilities of Station No. 1 of the Atlantic Missile Range") under the designation "John F. Kennedy Space Center", spawning some confusion joining the two in the public mind. NASA Administrator James E. Webb clarified this by issuing a directive stating the Kennedy Space Center name applied only to the LOC, while the Air Force issued a general order renaming the military launch site Cape Kennedy Air Force Station.

 

Located on Merritt Island, Florida, the center is north-northwest of Cape Canaveral on the Atlantic Ocean, midway between Miami and Jacksonville on Florida's Space Coast, due east of Orlando. It is 34 miles (55 km) long and roughly six miles (9.7 km) wide, covering 219 square miles (570 km2). KSC is a major central Florida tourist destination and is approximately one hour's drive from the Orlando area. The Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex offers public tours of the center and Cape Canaveral Space Force Station.

 

From 1967 through 1973, there were 13 Saturn V launches, including the ten remaining Apollo missions after Apollo 7. The first of two uncrewed flights, Apollo 4 (Apollo-Saturn 501) on November 9, 1967, was also the first rocket launch from KSC. The Saturn V's first crewed launch on December 21, 1968, was Apollo 8's lunar orbiting mission. The next two missions tested the Lunar Module: Apollo 9 (Earth orbit) and Apollo 10 (lunar orbit). Apollo 11, launched from Pad A on July 16, 1969, made the first Moon landing on July 20. The Apollo 11 launch included crewmembers Neil Armstrong, Michael Collins, and Buzz Aldrin, and attracted a record-breaking 650 million television viewers. Apollo 12 followed four months later. From 1970 to 1972, the Apollo program concluded at KSC with the launches of missions 13 through 17.

 

On May 14, 1973, the last Saturn V launch put the Skylab space station in orbit from Pad 39A. By this time, the Cape Kennedy pads 34 and 37 used for the Saturn IB were decommissioned, so Pad 39B was modified to accommodate the Saturn IB, and used to launch three crewed missions to Skylab that year, as well as the final Apollo spacecraft for the Apollo–Soyuz Test Project in 1975.

 

As the Space Shuttle was being designed, NASA received proposals for building alternative launch-and-landing sites at locations other than KSC, which demanded study. KSC had important advantages, including its existing facilities; location on the Intracoastal Waterway; and its southern latitude, which gives a velocity advantage to missions launched in easterly near-equatorial orbits. Disadvantages included: its inability to safely launch military missions into polar orbit, since spent boosters would be likely to fall on the Carolinas or Cuba; corrosion from the salt air; and frequent cloudy or stormy weather. Although building a new site at White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico was seriously considered, NASA announced its decision in April 1972 to use KSC for the shuttle. Since the Shuttle could not be landed automatically or by remote control, the launch of Columbia on April 12, 1981 for its first orbital mission STS-1, was NASA's first crewed launch of a vehicle that had not been tested in prior uncrewed launches.

 

In 1976, the VAB's south parking area was the site of Third Century America, a science and technology display commemorating the U.S. Bicentennial. Concurrent with this event, the U.S. flag was painted on the south side of the VAB. During the late 1970s, LC-39 was reconfigured to support the Space Shuttle. Two Orbiter Processing Facilities were built near the VAB as hangars with a third added in the 1980s.

 

KSC's 2.9-mile (4.7 km) Shuttle Landing Facility (SLF) was the orbiters' primary end-of-mission landing site, although the first KSC landing did not take place until the tenth flight, when Challenger completed STS-41-B on February 11, 1984; the primary landing site until then was Edwards Air Force Base in California, subsequently used as a backup landing site. The SLF also provided a return-to-launch-site (RTLS) abort option, which was not utilized. The SLF is among the longest runways in the world.

 

On October 28, 2009, the Ares I-X launch from Pad 39B was the first uncrewed launch from KSC since the Skylab workshop in 1973.

 

Beginning in 1958, NASA and military worked side by side on robotic mission launches (previously referred to as unmanned), cooperating as they broke ground in the field. In the early 1960s, NASA had as many as two robotic mission launches a month. The frequent number of flights allowed for quick evolution of the vehicles, as engineers gathered data, learned from anomalies and implemented upgrades. In 1963, with the intent of KSC ELV work focusing on the ground support equipment and facilities, a separate Atlas/Centaur organization was formed under NASA's Lewis Center (now Glenn Research Center (GRC)), taking that responsibility from the Launch Operations Center (aka KSC).

 

Though almost all robotics missions launched from the Cape Canaveral Space Force Station (CCSFS), KSC "oversaw the final assembly and testing of rockets as they arrived at the Cape." In 1965, KSC's Unmanned Launch Operations directorate became responsible for all NASA uncrewed launch operations, including those at Vandenberg Space Force Base. From the 1950s to 1978, KSC chose the rocket and payload processing facilities for all robotic missions launching in the U.S., overseeing their near launch processing and checkout. In addition to government missions, KSC performed this service for commercial and foreign missions also, though non-U.S. government entities provided reimbursement. NASA also funded Cape Canaveral Space Force Station launch pad maintenance and launch vehicle improvements.

 

All this changed with the Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984, after which NASA only coordinated its own and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) ELV launches. Companies were able to "operate their own launch vehicles" and utilize NASA's launch facilities. Payload processing handled by private firms also started to occur outside of KSC. Reagan's 1988 space policy furthered the movement of this work from KSC to commercial companies. That same year, launch complexes on Cape Canaveral Air Force Force Station started transferring from NASA to Air Force Space Command management.

 

In the 1990s, though KSC was not performing the hands-on ELV work, engineers still maintained an understanding of ELVs and had contracts allowing them insight into the vehicles so they could provide knowledgeable oversight. KSC also worked on ELV research and analysis and the contractors were able to utilize KSC personnel as a resource for technical issues. KSC, with the payload and launch vehicle industries, developed advances in automation of the ELV launch and ground operations to enable competitiveness of U.S. rockets against the global market.

 

In 1998, the Launch Services Program (LSP) formed at KSC, pulling together programs (and personnel) that already existed at KSC, GRC, Goddard Space Flight Center, and more to manage the launch of NASA and NOAA robotic missions. Cape Canaveral Space Force Station and VAFB are the primary launch sites for LSP missions, though other sites are occasionally used. LSP payloads such as the Mars Science Laboratory have been processed at KSC before being transferred to a launch pad on Cape Canaveral Space Force Station.

 

On 16 November 2022, at 06:47:44 UTC the Space Launch System (SLS) was launched from Complex 39B as part of the Artemis 1 mission.

 

As the International Space Station modules design began in the early 1990s, KSC began to work with other NASA centers and international partners to prepare for processing before launch onboard the Space Shuttles. KSC utilized its hands-on experience processing the 22 Spacelab missions in the Operations and Checkout Building to gather expectations of ISS processing. These experiences were incorporated into the design of the Space Station Processing Facility (SSPF), which began construction in 1991. The Space Station Directorate formed in 1996. KSC personnel were embedded at station module factories for insight into their processes.

 

From 1997 to 2007, KSC planned and performed on the ground integration tests and checkouts of station modules: three Multi-Element Integration Testing (MEIT) sessions and the Integration Systems Test (IST). Numerous issues were found and corrected that would have been difficult to nearly impossible to do on-orbit.

 

Today KSC continues to process ISS payloads from across the world before launch along with developing its experiments for on orbit. The proposed Lunar Gateway would be manufactured and processed at the Space Station Processing Facility.

 

The following are current programs and initiatives at Kennedy Space Center:

Commercial Crew Program

Exploration Ground Systems Program

NASA is currently designing the next heavy launch vehicle known as the Space Launch System (SLS) for continuation of human spaceflight.

On December 5, 2014, NASA launched the first uncrewed flight test of the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV), currently under development to facilitate human exploration of the Moon and Mars.

Launch Services Program

Educational Launch of Nanosatellites (ELaNa)

Research and Technology

Artemis program

Lunar Gateway

International Space Station Payloads

Camp KSC: educational camps for schoolchildren in spring and summer, with a focus on space, aviation and robotics.

 

The KSC Industrial Area, where many of the center's support facilities are located, is 5 miles (8 km) south of LC-39. It includes the Headquarters Building, the Operations and Checkout Building and the Central Instrumentation Facility. The astronaut crew quarters are in the O&C; before it was completed, the astronaut crew quarters were located in Hangar S at the Cape Canaveral Missile Test Annex (now Cape Canaveral Space Force Station). Located at KSC was the Merritt Island Spaceflight Tracking and Data Network station (MILA), a key radio communications and spacecraft tracking complex.

 

Facilities at the Kennedy Space Center are directly related to its mission to launch and recover missions. Facilities are available to prepare and maintain spacecraft and payloads for flight. The Headquarters (HQ) Building houses offices for the Center Director, library, film and photo archives, a print shop and security. When the KSC Library first opened, it was part of the Army Ballistic Missile Agency. However, in 1965, the library moved into three separate sections in the newly opened NASA headquarters before eventually becoming a single unit in 1970. The library contains over four million items related to the history and the work at Kennedy. As one of ten NASA center libraries in the country, their collection focuses on engineering, science, and technology. The archives contain planning documents, film reels, and original photographs covering the history of KSC. The library is not open to the public but is available for KSC, Space Force, and Navy employees who work on site. Many of the media items from the collection are digitized and available through NASA's KSC Media Gallery Archived December 6, 2020, at the Wayback Machine or through their more up-to-date Flickr gallery.

 

A new Headquarters Building was completed in 2019 as part of the Central Campus consolidation. Groundbreaking began in 2014.

 

The center operated its own 17-mile (27 km) short-line railroad. This operation was discontinued in 2015, with the sale of its final two locomotives. A third had already been donated to a museum. The line was costing $1.3 million annually to maintain.

 

The Neil Armstrong Operations and Checkout Building (O&C) (previously known as the Manned Spacecraft Operations Building) is a historic site on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places dating back to the 1960s and was used to receive, process, and integrate payloads for the Gemini and Apollo programs, the Skylab program in the 1970s, and for initial segments of the International Space Station through the 1990s. The Apollo and Space Shuttle astronauts would board the astronaut transfer van to launch complex 39 from the O&C building.

The three-story, 457,000-square-foot (42,500 m2) Space Station Processing Facility (SSPF) consists of two enormous processing bays, an airlock, operational control rooms, laboratories, logistics areas and office space for support of non-hazardous Space Station and Shuttle payloads to ISO 14644-1 class 5 standards. Opened in 1994, it is the largest factory building in the KSC industrial area.

The Vertical Processing Facility (VPF) features a 71-by-38-foot (22 by 12 m) door where payloads that are processed in the vertical position are brought in and manipulated with two overhead cranes and a hoist capable of lifting up to 35 short tons (32 t).

The Hypergolic Maintenance and Checkout Area (HMCA) comprises three buildings that are isolated from the rest of the industrial area because of the hazardous materials handled there. Hypergolic-fueled modules that made up the Space Shuttle Orbiter's reaction control system, orbital maneuvering system and auxiliary power units were stored and serviced in the HMCF.

The Multi-Payload Processing Facility is a 19,647 square feet (1,825.3 m2) building used for Orion spacecraft and payload processing.

The Payload Hazardous Servicing Facility (PHSF) contains a 70-by-110-foot (21 by 34 m) service bay, with a 100,000-pound (45,000 kg), 85-foot (26 m) hook height. It also contains a 58-by-80-foot (18 by 24 m) payload airlock. Its temperature is maintained at 70 °F (21 °C).[55]

The Blue Origin rocket manufacturing facility is located immediately south of the KSC visitor complex. Completed in 2019, it serves as the company's factory for the manufacture of New Glenn orbital rockets.

 

Launch Complex 39 (LC-39) was originally built for the Saturn V, the largest and most powerful operational launch vehicle until the Space Launch System, for the Apollo crewed Moon landing program. Since the end of the Apollo program in 1972, LC-39 has been used to launch every NASA human space flight, including Skylab (1973), the Apollo–Soyuz Test Project (1975), and the Space Shuttle program (1981–2011).

 

Since December 1968, all launch operations have been conducted from launch pads A and B at LC-39. Both pads are on the ocean, 3 miles (4.8 km) east of the VAB. From 1969 to 1972, LC-39 was the "Moonport" for all six Apollo crewed Moon landing missions using the Saturn V, and was used from 1981 to 2011 for all Space Shuttle launches.

 

Human missions to the Moon required the large three-stage Saturn V rocket, which was 363 feet (111 meters) tall and 33 feet (10 meters) in diameter. At KSC, Launch Complex 39 was built on Merritt Island to accommodate the new rocket. Construction of the $800 million project began in November 1962. LC-39 pads A and B were completed by October 1965 (planned Pads C, D and E were canceled), the VAB was completed in June 1965, and the infrastructure by late 1966.

 

The complex includes: the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB), a 130,000,000 cubic feet (3,700,000 m3) hangar capable of holding four Saturn Vs. The VAB was the largest structure in the world by volume when completed in 1965.

a transporter capable of carrying 5,440 tons along a crawlerway to either of two launch pads;

a 446-foot (136 m) mobile service structure, with three Mobile Launcher Platforms, each containing a fixed launch umbilical tower;

the Launch Control Center; and

a news media facility.

 

Launch Complex 48 (LC-48) is a multi-user launch site under construction for small launchers and spacecraft. It will be located between Launch Complex 39A and Space Launch Complex 41, with LC-39A to the north and SLC-41 to the south. LC-48 will be constructed as a "clean pad" to support multiple launch systems with differing propellant needs. While initially only planned to have a single pad, the complex is capable of being expanded to two at a later date.

 

As a part of promoting commercial space industry growth in the area and the overall center as a multi-user spaceport, KSC leases some of its properties. Here are some major examples:

 

Exploration Park to multiple users (partnership with Space Florida)

Shuttle Landing Facility to Space Florida (who contracts use to private companies)

Orbiter Processing Facility (OPF)-3 to Boeing (for CST-100 Starliner)

Launch Complex 39A, Launch Control Center Firing Room 4 and land for SpaceX's Roberts Road facility (Hanger X) to SpaceX

O&C High Bay to Lockheed Martin (for Orion processing)

Land for FPL's Space Coast Next Generation Solar Energy Center to Florida Power and Light (FPL)

Hypergolic Maintenance Facility (HMF) to United Paradyne Corporation (UPC)

 

The Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex, operated by Delaware North since 1995, has a variety of exhibits, artifacts, displays and attractions on the history and future of human and robotic spaceflight. Bus tours of KSC originate from here. The complex also includes the separate Apollo/Saturn V Center, north of the VAB and the United States Astronaut Hall of Fame, six miles west near Titusville. There were 1.5 million visitors in 2009. It had some 700 employees.

 

It was announced on May 29, 2015, that the Astronaut Hall of Fame exhibit would be moved from its current location to another location within the Visitor Complex to make room for an upcoming high-tech attraction entitled "Heroes and Legends". The attraction, designed by Orlando-based design firm Falcon's Treehouse, opened November 11, 2016.

 

In March 2016, the visitor center unveiled the new location of the iconic countdown clock at the complex's entrance; previously, the clock was located with a flagpole at the press site. The clock was originally built and installed in 1969 and listed with the flagpole in the National Register of Historic Places in January 2000. In 2019, NASA celebrated the 50th anniversary of the Apollo program, and the launch of Apollo 10 on May 18. In summer of 2019, Lunar Module 9 (LM-9) was relocated to the Apollo/Saturn V Center as part of an initiative to rededicate the center and celebrate the 50th anniversary of the Apollo Program.

 

Historic locations

NASA lists the following Historic Districts at KSC; each district has multiple associated facilities:

 

Launch Complex 39: Pad A Historic District

Launch Complex 39: Pad B Historic District

Shuttle Landing Facility (SLF) Area Historic District

Orbiter Processing Historic District

Solid Rocket Booster (SRB) Disassembly and Refurbishment Complex Historic District

NASA KSC Railroad System Historic District

NASA-owned Cape Canaveral Space Force Station Industrial Area Historic District

There are 24 historic properties outside of these historic districts, including the Space Shuttle Atlantis, Vehicle Assembly Building, Crawlerway, and Operations and Checkout Building.[71] KSC has one National Historic Landmark, 78 National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) listed or eligible sites, and 100 Archaeological Sites.

 

Further information: John F. Kennedy Space Center MPS

Other facilities

The Rotation, Processing and Surge Facility (RPSF) is responsible for the preparation of solid rocket booster segments for transportation to the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB). The RPSF was built in 1984 to perform SRB operations that had previously been conducted in high bays 2 and 4 of the VAB at the beginning of the Space Shuttle program. It was used until the Space Shuttle's retirement, and will be used in the future by the Space Launch System[75] (SLS) and OmegA rockets.

Do you have roadside assistance? Do you need it? Numerous people don't think too much about it but it's something that can eradicate some of the tension in your life. Most people spend at least an hour or two on the streets every day, even if they don't go far. But many never stop to think what they would do if they abruptly discovered themselves stuck on the side of the road.

 

Motor Club of America gives out a broad variety of goods and services to drivers, and people who don't have a car. Those advantages cover all over the United States, Canada & Puerto Rico. Which encompass roadside assistance, emergency room benefits, hotel discounts, travel assistance and many more.

 

Speaking specifically about MCA most popular $19.95 Total Security Motor plan it was designed to offer the highest grade of roadside services and advantages available on the market. This Total Security program presents all of the benefits you would obtain with the Security and Security Plus plans in addition very good roadside services and a number of other exceptional advantages.

 

Emergency Road Service*

Travel Assistance Reimbursement*

Travel Assistance Program*

Trip Planning and Travel Reservations*

Arrest Bond*

Bail Bonds*

Attorneys Fees*

Attorney Services*

Attorney Discounted Hourly Rates*

Discounts on Auto Related Services*

Stolen Vehicle Reward*

Credit Card Protection*

Legal Services Deeply Discounted Fixed Fee Schedule*

Discounts on Prescriptions, Vision Care, and Dental*

Emergency Reimbursement Benefits*

Daily Hospital Benefit*

Accidental Death Benefit*

 

Battery Boost

Fuel Delivery

Tire Change

Lock-Out Service

Wrecker Towing Service

And Much More

 

Emergency Road Service

Motor Club of America will pay up to $100 to provide Emergency Road Service on RVs, Motorcycles, Trailers, and vehicle's with a load capacity of 1 ton or greater.

 

Travel Assistance Reimbursement

If your vehicle is disabled in an auto misfortune, we will reimburse you up to $500 for rental vehicle or lodging, meal, and transportation expenses counting on where the accident happens.

 

Trip Planning & Travel Reservations

Motor Club of America offer a variety of travel benefits with all the roadside service membership plans including route planning and special airline, rental car, and hotel discounts.

 

Arrest Bond

Your Motor Club of America membership card can act in lieu of a cash bail for up to $500 when you are engaged in a traffic violation as allowed by state laws.

 

Bail Bonds

For all of the roadside service and motor club constituents, we can arrange up to a $25,000 bond to release you if you are ascribed with a going traffic law violation when driving a vehicle. This includes for vehicular manslaughter and auto associated negligent murder charges.

 

Attorney Fees

$2,000 in benefits for attorney fees in order to defend you from charges resulting from a covered auto. This includes:

Up to $200 for covered Moving Violations

Up to $500 for covered auto related Personal Injury matters

Up to $500 for covered Vehicle Damage issues

Up to $2,000 for covered auto related Negligent Homicide or Vehicular Manslaughter

 

Stolen Vehicle Reward

Motor Club of America will pay a $5,000 reward to law enforcement agency or individual who provides information that leads to the arrest and conviction of who's responsible for the theft of your covered vehicle in an attempt to encourage stolen vehicle recovery.

 

Discounts on Prescriptions, Vision Care, & Dental

Motor Club of America membership offers a variety of medical discounts up to a 65% discount on prescriptions, up to a 50% discount on vision, and up to a 50% discount on dental procedures.

 

Emergency Reimbursement Benefits

If you are injured in a covered accident, Motor Club of America will provide up to $500 in cash to pay for emergency room or trauma center treatment that is required for injuries caused in the accident. This includes reimbursement for the cost of:

 

Cast or Splints

Lab Work

Nursing Service

Transfusions

Anesthetics

Doctor Care

IV’s

Facility Care

 

Daily Hospital Benefits

Up to $54,500 in cash benefits to be paid at $150 per day for hospitalization that results from injuries received in a covered accident.

 

Accidental Death Benefits

Members of the Total Security program have the opportunity to enroll, free of charge, in one or all of the accidental death and dismemberment coverage packages. These include:

 

1. You, as named member, up to $50,000; or

2. You & your spouse, up to $25,000 each, plus job retraining is available for surviving spouse in many cases; or

3. You for up to $30,000, your spouse up to $15,000, children up to $3,500 each.

Other optional benefits include job retraining for surviving spouse, continuing child care plus continuing education support.

.

Travel Assistance Program

Motor Club of America offers a travel assistant program, which assists in worldwide travel for issues related to injuries or death that results from a covered accident.

 

Medical evacuation & repatriation

Non-Medical Repatriation

Return of Remains

Hospital Visits

Return of Child

Return of Companion

 

Emergency Roadside Assistance

Las Vegas, NV 89117

(702) 810-5812

mca-vegas.info

emergency-roadside-assistance.info

Twitter: twitter.com/VEGASMotorClub

Facebook: www.facebook.com/MotorClubAmericaLV

Youtube: www.youtube.com/user/MCAVegas

 

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has proposed piloting an “International Pricing Index” (IPI) payment model to reduce reimbursement levels for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), as well as proposing other reforms to long-standing policies regarding commercialized medicines. In a year with a record number of new medicines being approved to reach patients in the United States, such reforms introduce significant uncertainty for many investors’ valuation models. This session will feature drug developers, investors, and policy experts to explain the resource allocation implications if these reforms proceed and risks of shrinking the pipelines of new medicines for years to come unless alternative approaches can be introduced.

 

Speakers

James C. Greenwood, Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO)

Paul Lammers, Triumvira Immunologics

Susan Peschin, Alliance for Aging Research

Peter Pitts, Center for Medicine in the Public Interest

Duane Schulthess, Vital Transformation

Erica Whittaker, UCB Ventures

Peter Young, Pappas Capital

Governor Abercrombie signed the following bills:

 

House Bill 2052 (Relating to Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) increases access to Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) by updating references from “physicians orders for life-sustaining treatment” to “provider orders for life-sustaining treatment.” The measure also expands health care provider signatory authority to include advance practice registered nurses and corrects inconsistencies of terms describing who may sign a POLST form on behalf of a patient.

 

House Bill 1616 (Relating to Health Planning) adds to the Hawaii State Planning Act’s objectives and policies for health, the identification of social determinants of health and prioritization of programs, services, interventions, and activities that address identified social determinants of health to improve Native Hawaiian health in accordance with federal law and reduce health disparities of disproportionately affected demographics.

 

House Bill 1723 (Relating to Psychiatric Facilities) amends the notice requirements for the discharge of an involuntary patient committed pursuant to legal proceeding involving fitness to proceed and requires the family court to conduct a timely hearing prior to the termination of a standing commitment order.

 

House Bill 2320 (Relating to Health) establishes health equity as a goal for the DOH and requires the DOH to consider social determinants of health in assessing health needs in the state. The measure is known as “Loretta’s Law” for the late DOH Director Loretta Fuddy, who was passionate proponent.

 

House Bill 2581 (Relating to Insurance) establishes the State Innovation Waiver Task Force and requires the task force to submit two interim reports and a final report to the legislature.

 

Senate Bill 2469 (Relating to Telehealth) requires equivalent reimbursement for services, including behavioral health services, provided through telehealth as for the same services provided via face-to-face contact between a health care provider and a patient. The measure also clarifies that health care providers for purposes of telehealth include primary care providers, mental health providers, oral health providers, physicians and osteopathic physicians, advanced practice registered nurses, psychologists, and dentists. For consistency purposes, the bill changes statutory references of “telemedicine” to “telehealth.”

 

House Bill 2400 (Relating to Temporary Disability Benefits) provides temporary disability benefits to employees who suffer disabilities as a result of donating organs.

 

Senate Bill 1233 (Relating to Leaves of Absence) requires certain private employers to allow employees to take leaves of absence for organ, bone marrow, or peripheral blood stem cell donation. Unused sick leave, vacation, or paid time off, or unpaid time off, may be used for these leaves of absence. The measure also requires employers to restore an employee returning from leave to the same or equivalent position and establishes a private right of action for employees seeking enforcement of provisions.

GOVERNOR JUSTICE PROCLAIMS NATIONAL SCHOOL BREAKFAST WEEK IN WEST VIRGINIA

  

CHARLESTON, W.Va. - Gov. Jim Justice today proclaimed the week of March 6-10, 2017 as national school breakfast week in West Virginia. This year’s theme, “Take the School Breakfast Challenge,” encourages parents, students and school officials to start their morning with a healthy breakfast to provide an energizing start to the day.

 

During the ceremony, Justice, along with West Virginia Superintendent of Schools, Dr. Michael Martirano, West Virginia School Nutrition Association President, Chris Derico, Roberta Hodsdon with USDA and West Virginia student ambassador, Miranda Pate from Hurricane High School signed the school breakfast pledge, vowing to eat a healthy breakfast every day.

   

“Breakfast is the most important meal of the day for all of us, but especially for our kids,” said Governor Jim Justice. “It fuels their learning experience and ability to achieve. However, we are told that more than half of our school children don’t eat breakfast and that is a significant problem. Hungry children are more likely to have discipline problems, lower grades and are more likely to be tardy or absent. So making sure our kids eat a healthy breakfast is a top priority.”

  

The West Virginia Feed to Achieve Act, recently signed into law, emphasizes all Mountain State students have adequate time and availability for school breakfast. As a result, more than 2.9 million school breakfasts are served monthly to students at more than 700 schools and feeding sites throughout West Virginia.

 

The Food Research and Action Center (FRAC) has ranked West Virginia first in the nation in school breakfast participation for three years in a row. West Virginia schools implement innovative breakfast strategies such as breakfast in the classroom and grab and go breakfast that allow every student to have easy access to a healthy meal to start their day.

 

“Children perform at their best when they receive proper nutrition," Martirano said. “The School Breakfast Program is an important tool for educators to ensure that students receive adequate nutrition to learn and thrive so they are not distracted in the classroom.”

   

Students who participate in school breakfast exhibit decreased behavioral and psychological problems and have lower rates of absence and tardiness. West Virginia receives up to $5 million per month in federal reimbursement statewide for breakfast participation.

 

About National School Breakfast Week

National School Breakfast Week was launched in 1989 to raise awareness of the availability of the School Breakfast Program to all children and to promote the links between eating a good breakfast, academic achievement and healthy lifestyles. The “Take the School Breakfast Challenge” is made possible by the nonprofit School Nutrition Association, Kellogg’s and Potatoes USA. To learn more, visit: schoolnutrition.org/Meetings/Events/NSBW/2017/.

The United States Astronaut Hall of Fame, located inside the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex Heroes & Legends building on Merritt Island, Florida, honors American astronauts and features the world's largest collection of their personal memorabilia, focusing on those astronauts who have been inducted into the Hall. Exhibits include Wally Schirra's Sigma 7 space capsule from the fifth crewed Mercury mission and the Gemini IX spacecraft flown by Gene Cernan and Thomas P. Stafford in 1966.

 

In the 1980s, the six then-surviving Mercury Seven astronauts conceived of establishing a place where US space travelers could be remembered and honored, along the lines of halls of fame for other fields. The Mercury Seven Foundation and Astronaut Scholarship Foundation were formed, and have a role in the ongoing operations of the Hall of Fame. The foundation's first executive director was former Associated Press space reporter Howard Benedict.

 

The Astronaut Hall of Fame was opened on October 29, 1990, by the U.S. Space Camp Foundation, which was the first owner of the facility. It was located next to the Florida branch of Space Camp.

 

The Hall of Fame closed for several months in 2002 when U.S. Space Camp Foundation's creditors foreclosed on the property due to low attendance and mounting debt. That September, an auction was held and the property was purchased by Delaware North Park Services on behalf of NASA and the property was added to the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex. The Hall of Fame re-opened December 14, 2002.

 

The Hall of Fame, which was originally located just west of the NASA Causeway, closed to the public on November 2, 2015, in preparation for its relocation to the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex 6 miles (9.7 km) to the east on Merritt Island. Outside of the original building was a full-scale replica of a Space Shuttle orbiter named Inspiration (originally named "Shuttle To Tomorrow" where visitors could enter and view a program). Inspiration served only as an outdoor, full scale, static display which visitors could not enter. After the Hall of Fame was transferred to the KSC Visitor Complex, Inspiration was acquired by LVX System and was placed in storage at the Shuttle Landing Facility at the Kennedy Space Center; in 2016, the shuttle was loaded on to a barge to be taken for refurbishment before going on an educational tour.

 

The building was purchased at auction by visitor complex operator Delaware North and renamed the ATX Center, and for a time housed educational programs including Camp Kennedy Space Center and the Astronaut Training Experience. Those programs have since been moved to the KSC Visitor Complex, and as of December 2019, the structure was being offered for lease. In July 2020, Lockheed Martin announced it would lease the building to support work on the NASA Orion crew capsule.

 

Inductees into the Hall of Fame are selected by a blue ribbon committee of former NASA officials and flight controllers, historians, journalists, and other space authorities (including former astronauts) based on their accomplishments in space or their contributions to the advancement of space exploration. Except for 2002, inductions have been held every year since 2001.

 

As its inaugural class in 1990, the Hall of Fame inducted the United States' original group of astronauts: the Mercury Seven. In addition to being the first American astronauts, they set several firsts in American spaceflight, both auspicious and tragic. Alan Shepard was the first American in space and later became one of the twelve people to walk on the Moon. John Glenn was the first American to orbit the Earth and after his induction went on, in 1998, to become the oldest man to fly in space, aged 77. Gus Grissom was the first American to fly in space twice and was the commander of the ill-fated Apollo 1, which resulted in the first astronaut deaths directly related to preparation for spaceflight.

 

Thirteen astronauts from the Gemini and Apollo programs were inducted in the second class of 1993. This class included the first and last humans to walk on the Moon, Neil Armstrong and Eugene Cernan; Ed White, the first American to walk in space (also killed in the Apollo 1 accident); Jim Lovell, commander of the famously near-tragic Apollo 13; and John Young, whose six flights included a moonwalk and command of the first Space Shuttle mission.

 

The third class was inducted in 1997 and consisted of the 24 additional Apollo, Skylab, and ASTP astronauts. Notable members of the class were Roger Chaffee, the third astronaut killed in the Apollo 1 fire and the only unflown astronaut in the Hall; Harrison Schmitt, the first scientist and next-to-last person to walk on the Moon; and Jack Swigert and Fred Haise, the Apollo 13 crewmembers not previously inducted.

 

The philosophy regarding the first three groups of inductees was that all astronauts who flew in NASA's "pioneering" programs (which would include Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, Apollo Applications Program (Skylab), and Apollo-Soyuz Test Project) would be included simply by virtue of their participation in a spaceflight in these early programs. The first group (the inaugural class of 1990) would only include the original Mercury astronauts (most of whom would go on to fly in later programs). The second group of inductees would include those astronauts who began their spaceflight careers during Gemini (all of whom would go on to fly in later programs). The third group of inductees would include those astronauts who began their spaceflight careers during Apollo, Skylab, and ASTP (some of whom would go on to fly in the Space Shuttle program). Since it would not be practical (or meaningful) to induct all astronauts who ever flew in space, all subsequent inductees (Space Shuttle program and beyond) are considered based on their accomplishments and contributions to the human spaceflight endeavor which would set them apart from their peers.

 

Over four dozen astronauts from the Space Shuttle program have been inducted since 2001. Among these are Sally Ride, the first American woman in space; Story Musgrave, who flew six missions in the 1980s and 90s; and Francis Scobee, commander of the ill-fated final Challenger mission.

 

The 2010 class consisted of Guion Bluford Jr., Kenneth Bowersox, Frank Culbertson and Kathryn Thornton. The 2011 inductees were Karol Bobko and Susan Helms. The 2012 inductees were Franklin Chang-Diaz, Kevin Chilton and Charles Precourt. Bonnie Dunbar, Curt Brown and Eileen Collins were inducted in 2013, and Shannon Lucid and Jerry Ross comprised the 2014 class.

 

Those inducted in 2015 were John Grunsfeld, Steven Lindsey, Kent Rominger, and Rhea Seddon. In 2016, inductees included Brian Duffy and Scott E. Parazynski. Ellen Ochoa and Michael Foale were announced as the 2017 class of the United States Astronaut Hall of Fame. Scott Altman and Thomas Jones followed in 2018. The 2019 inductees were James Buchli and Janet L. Kavandi.

 

Michael López-Alegría, Scott Kelly and Pamela Melroy were the 2020 inductees, inducted in a November 2021 ceremony. The 2022 inductees were Christopher Ferguson, David Leestma, and Sandra Magnus. Roy Bridges Jr. and Mark Kelly were the 2023 inductees.

 

The Hall of Heroes is composed of tributes to the inductees. Among the Hall of Fame's displays is Sigma 7, the Mercury spacecraft piloted by Wally Schirra which orbited the Earth six times in 1962, and the Gemini 9A capsule flown by Gene Cernan and Thomas P. Stafford in 1966. An Astronaut Adventure room includes simulators for use by children.

 

The spacesuit worn by Gus Grissom during his 1961 Liberty Bell 7 Mercury flight is on display and has been the subject of a dispute between NASA and Grissom's heirs and supporters since 2002. The spacesuit, along with other Grissom artifacts, were loaned to the original owners of the Hall of Fame by the Grissom family when it opened. After the Hall of Fame went into bankruptcy and was taken over by a NASA contractor in 2002, the family requested that all their items be returned. All of the items were returned to Grissom's family except the spacesuit, because both NASA and the Grissoms claim ownership of it. NASA claims Grissom checked out the spacesuit for a show and tell at his son's school, and then never returned it, while the Grissoms claim Gus rescued the spacesuit from a scrap heap.

 

The John F. Kennedy Space Center (KSC, originally known as the NASA Launch Operations Center), located on Merritt Island, Florida, is one of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) ten field centers. Since December 1968, KSC has been NASA's primary launch center of human spaceflight. Launch operations for the Apollo, Skylab and Space Shuttle programs were carried out from Kennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39 and managed by KSC.[4] Located on the east coast of Florida, KSC is adjacent to Cape Canaveral Space Force Station (CCSFS). The management of the two entities work very closely together, share resources and operate facilities on each other's property.

 

Though the first Apollo flights and all Project Mercury and Project Gemini flights took off from the then-Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, the launches were managed by KSC and its previous organization, the Launch Operations Directorate. Starting with the fourth Gemini mission, the NASA launch control center in Florida (Mercury Control Center, later the Launch Control Center) began handing off control of the vehicle to the Mission Control Center in Houston, shortly after liftoff; in prior missions it held control throughout the entire mission.

 

Additionally, the center manages launch of robotic and commercial crew missions and researches food production and In-Situ Resource Utilization for off-Earth exploration. Since 2010, the center has worked to become a multi-user spaceport through industry partnerships, even adding a new launch pad (LC-39C) in 2015.

 

There are about 700 facilities and buildings grouped across the center's 144,000 acres (580 km2). Among the unique facilities at KSC are the 525-foot (160 m) tall Vehicle Assembly Building for stacking NASA's largest rockets, the Launch Control Center, which conducts space launches at KSC, the Operations and Checkout Building, which houses the astronauts dormitories and suit-up area, a Space Station factory, and a 3-mile (4.8 km) long Shuttle Landing Facility. There is also a Visitor Complex open to the public on site.

 

Since 1949, the military had been performing launch operations at what would become Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. In December 1959, the Department of Defense transferred 5,000 personnel and the Missile Firing Laboratory to NASA to become the Launch Operations Directorate under NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.

 

President John F. Kennedy's 1961 goal of a crewed lunar landing by 1970 required an expansion of launch operations. On July 1, 1962, the Launch Operations Directorate was separated from MSFC to become the Launch Operations Center (LOC). Also, Cape Canaveral was inadequate to host the new launch facility design required for the mammoth 363-foot (111 m) tall, 7,500,000-pound-force (33,000 kN) thrust Saturn V rocket, which would be assembled vertically in a large hangar and transported on a mobile platform to one of several launch pads. Therefore, the decision was made to build a new LOC site located adjacent to Cape Canaveral on Merritt Island.

 

NASA began land acquisition in 1962, buying title to 131 square miles (340 km2) and negotiating with the state of Florida for an additional 87 square miles (230 km2). The major buildings in KSC's Industrial Area were designed by architect Charles Luckman. Construction began in November 1962, and Kennedy visited the site twice in 1962, and again just a week before his assassination on November 22, 1963.

 

On November 29, 1963, the facility was given its current name by President Lyndon B. Johnson under Executive Order 11129. Johnson's order joined both the civilian LOC and the military Cape Canaveral station ("the facilities of Station No. 1 of the Atlantic Missile Range") under the designation "John F. Kennedy Space Center", spawning some confusion joining the two in the public mind. NASA Administrator James E. Webb clarified this by issuing a directive stating the Kennedy Space Center name applied only to the LOC, while the Air Force issued a general order renaming the military launch site Cape Kennedy Air Force Station.

 

Located on Merritt Island, Florida, the center is north-northwest of Cape Canaveral on the Atlantic Ocean, midway between Miami and Jacksonville on Florida's Space Coast, due east of Orlando. It is 34 miles (55 km) long and roughly six miles (9.7 km) wide, covering 219 square miles (570 km2). KSC is a major central Florida tourist destination and is approximately one hour's drive from the Orlando area. The Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex offers public tours of the center and Cape Canaveral Space Force Station.

 

The KSC Industrial Area, where many of the center's support facilities are located, is 5 miles (8 km) south of LC-39. It includes the Headquarters Building, the Operations and Checkout Building and the Central Instrumentation Facility. The astronaut crew quarters are in the O&C; before it was completed, the astronaut crew quarters were located in Hangar S[39] at the Cape Canaveral Missile Test Annex (now Cape Canaveral Space Force Station). Located at KSC was the Merritt Island Spaceflight Tracking and Data Network station (MILA), a key radio communications and spacecraft tracking complex.

 

Facilities at the Kennedy Space Center are directly related to its mission to launch and recover missions. Facilities are available to prepare and maintain spacecraft and payloads for flight. The Headquarters (HQ) Building houses offices for the Center Director, library, film and photo archives, a print shop and security. When the KSC Library first opened, it was part of the Army Ballistic Missile Agency. However, in 1965, the library moved into three separate sections in the newly opened NASA headquarters before eventually becoming a single unit in 1970. The library contains over four million items related to the history and the work at Kennedy. As one of ten NASA center libraries in the country, their collection focuses on engineering, science, and technology. The archives contain planning documents, film reels, and original photographs covering the history of KSC. The library is not open to the public but is available for KSC, Space Force, and Navy employees who work on site. Many of the media items from the collection are digitized and available through NASA's KSC Media Gallery or through their more up-to-date Flickr gallery.

 

A new Headquarters Building was completed in 2019 as part of the Central Campus consolidation. Groundbreaking began in 2014.

 

The center operated its own 17-mile (27 km) short-line railroad. This operation was discontinued in 2015, with the sale of its final two locomotives. A third had already been donated to a museum. The line was costing $1.3 million annually to maintain.

 

The Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex, operated by Delaware North since 1995, has a variety of exhibits, artifacts, displays and attractions on the history and future of human and robotic spaceflight. Bus tours of KSC originate from here. The complex also includes the separate Apollo/Saturn V Center, north of the VAB and the United States Astronaut Hall of Fame, six miles west near Titusville. There were 1.5 million visitors in 2009. It had some 700 employees.

 

It was announced on May 29, 2015, that the Astronaut Hall of Fame exhibit would be moved from its current location to another location within the Visitor Complex to make room for an upcoming high-tech attraction entitled "Heroes and Legends". The attraction, designed by Orlando-based design firm Falcon's Treehouse, opened November 11, 2016.

 

In March 2016, the visitor center unveiled the new location of the iconic countdown clock at the complex's entrance; previously, the clock was located with a flagpole at the press site. The clock was originally built and installed in 1969 and listed with the flagpole in the National Register of Historic Places in January 2000. In 2019, NASA celebrated the 50th anniversary of the Apollo program, and the launch of Apollo 10 on May 18. In summer of 2019, Lunar Module 9 (LM-9) was relocated to the Apollo/Saturn V Center as part of an initiative to rededicate the center and celebrate the 50th anniversary of the Apollo Program.

 

The John F. Kennedy Space Center (KSC, originally known as the NASA Launch Operations Center), located on Merritt Island, Florida, is one of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) ten field centers. Since December 1968, KSC has been NASA's primary launch center of American spaceflight, research, and technology. Launch operations for the Apollo, Skylab and Space Shuttle programs were carried out from Kennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39 and managed by KSC. Located on the east coast of Florida, KSC is adjacent to Cape Canaveral Space Force Station (CCSFS). The management of the two entities work very closely together, share resources and operate facilities on each other's property.

 

Though the first Apollo flights and all Project Mercury and Project Gemini flights took off from the then-Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, the launches were managed by KSC and its previous organization, the Launch Operations Directorate. Starting with the fourth Gemini mission, the NASA launch control center in Florida (Mercury Control Center, later the Launch Control Center) began handing off control of the vehicle to the Mission Control Center in Houston, shortly after liftoff; in prior missions it held control throughout the entire mission.

 

Additionally, the center manages launch of robotic and commercial crew missions and researches food production and in-situ resource utilization for off-Earth exploration. Since 2010, the center has worked to become a multi-user spaceport through industry partnerships, even adding a new launch pad (LC-39C) in 2015.

 

There are about 700 facilities and buildings grouped throughout the center's 144,000 acres (580 km2). Among the unique facilities at KSC are the 525-foot (160 m) tall Vehicle Assembly Building for stacking NASA's largest rockets, the Launch Control Center, which conducts space launches at KSC, the Operations and Checkout Building, which houses the astronauts dormitories and suit-up area, a Space Station factory, and a 3-mile (4.8 km) long Shuttle Landing Facility. There is also a Visitor Complex on site that is open to the public.

 

Since 1949, the military had been performing launch operations at what would become Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. In December 1959, the Department of Defense transferred 5,000 personnel and the Missile Firing Laboratory to NASA to become the Launch Operations Directorate under NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.

 

President John F. Kennedy's 1961 goal of a crewed lunar landing by 1970 required an expansion of launch operations. On July 1, 1962, the Launch Operations Directorate was separated from MSFC to become the Launch Operations Center (LOC). Also, Cape Canaveral was inadequate to host the new launch facility design required for the mammoth 363-foot (111 m) tall, 7,500,000-pound-force (33,000 kN) thrust Saturn V rocket, which would be assembled vertically in a large hangar and transported on a mobile platform to one of several launch pads. Therefore, the decision was made to build a new LOC site located adjacent to Cape Canaveral on Merritt Island.

 

NASA began land acquisition in 1962, buying title to 131 square miles (340 km2) and negotiating with the state of Florida for an additional 87 square miles (230 km2). The major buildings in KSC's Industrial Area were designed by architect Charles Luckman. Construction began in November 1962, and Kennedy visited the site twice in 1962, and again just a week before his assassination on November 22, 1963.

 

On November 29, 1963, the facility was named by President Lyndon B. Johnson under Executive Order 11129. Johnson's order joined both the civilian LOC and the military Cape Canaveral station ("the facilities of Station No. 1 of the Atlantic Missile Range") under the designation "John F. Kennedy Space Center", spawning some confusion joining the two in the public mind. NASA Administrator James E. Webb clarified this by issuing a directive stating the Kennedy Space Center name applied only to the LOC, while the Air Force issued a general order renaming the military launch site Cape Kennedy Air Force Station.

 

Located on Merritt Island, Florida, the center is north-northwest of Cape Canaveral on the Atlantic Ocean, midway between Miami and Jacksonville on Florida's Space Coast, due east of Orlando. It is 34 miles (55 km) long and roughly six miles (9.7 km) wide, covering 219 square miles (570 km2). KSC is a major central Florida tourist destination and is approximately one hour's drive from the Orlando area. The Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex offers public tours of the center and Cape Canaveral Space Force Station.

 

From 1967 through 1973, there were 13 Saturn V launches, including the ten remaining Apollo missions after Apollo 7. The first of two uncrewed flights, Apollo 4 (Apollo-Saturn 501) on November 9, 1967, was also the first rocket launch from KSC. The Saturn V's first crewed launch on December 21, 1968, was Apollo 8's lunar orbiting mission. The next two missions tested the Lunar Module: Apollo 9 (Earth orbit) and Apollo 10 (lunar orbit). Apollo 11, launched from Pad A on July 16, 1969, made the first Moon landing on July 20. The Apollo 11 launch included crewmembers Neil Armstrong, Michael Collins, and Buzz Aldrin, and attracted a record-breaking 650 million television viewers. Apollo 12 followed four months later. From 1970 to 1972, the Apollo program concluded at KSC with the launches of missions 13 through 17.

 

On May 14, 1973, the last Saturn V launch put the Skylab space station in orbit from Pad 39A. By this time, the Cape Kennedy pads 34 and 37 used for the Saturn IB were decommissioned, so Pad 39B was modified to accommodate the Saturn IB, and used to launch three crewed missions to Skylab that year, as well as the final Apollo spacecraft for the Apollo–Soyuz Test Project in 1975.

 

As the Space Shuttle was being designed, NASA received proposals for building alternative launch-and-landing sites at locations other than KSC, which demanded study. KSC had important advantages, including its existing facilities; location on the Intracoastal Waterway; and its southern latitude, which gives a velocity advantage to missions launched in easterly near-equatorial orbits. Disadvantages included: its inability to safely launch military missions into polar orbit, since spent boosters would be likely to fall on the Carolinas or Cuba; corrosion from the salt air; and frequent cloudy or stormy weather. Although building a new site at White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico was seriously considered, NASA announced its decision in April 1972 to use KSC for the shuttle. Since the Shuttle could not be landed automatically or by remote control, the launch of Columbia on April 12, 1981 for its first orbital mission STS-1, was NASA's first crewed launch of a vehicle that had not been tested in prior uncrewed launches.

 

In 1976, the VAB's south parking area was the site of Third Century America, a science and technology display commemorating the U.S. Bicentennial. Concurrent with this event, the U.S. flag was painted on the south side of the VAB. During the late 1970s, LC-39 was reconfigured to support the Space Shuttle. Two Orbiter Processing Facilities were built near the VAB as hangars with a third added in the 1980s.

 

KSC's 2.9-mile (4.7 km) Shuttle Landing Facility (SLF) was the orbiters' primary end-of-mission landing site, although the first KSC landing did not take place until the tenth flight, when Challenger completed STS-41-B on February 11, 1984; the primary landing site until then was Edwards Air Force Base in California, subsequently used as a backup landing site. The SLF also provided a return-to-launch-site (RTLS) abort option, which was not utilized. The SLF is among the longest runways in the world.

 

On October 28, 2009, the Ares I-X launch from Pad 39B was the first uncrewed launch from KSC since the Skylab workshop in 1973.

 

Beginning in 1958, NASA and military worked side by side on robotic mission launches (previously referred to as unmanned), cooperating as they broke ground in the field. In the early 1960s, NASA had as many as two robotic mission launches a month. The frequent number of flights allowed for quick evolution of the vehicles, as engineers gathered data, learned from anomalies and implemented upgrades. In 1963, with the intent of KSC ELV work focusing on the ground support equipment and facilities, a separate Atlas/Centaur organization was formed under NASA's Lewis Center (now Glenn Research Center (GRC)), taking that responsibility from the Launch Operations Center (aka KSC).

 

Though almost all robotics missions launched from the Cape Canaveral Space Force Station (CCSFS), KSC "oversaw the final assembly and testing of rockets as they arrived at the Cape." In 1965, KSC's Unmanned Launch Operations directorate became responsible for all NASA uncrewed launch operations, including those at Vandenberg Space Force Base. From the 1950s to 1978, KSC chose the rocket and payload processing facilities for all robotic missions launching in the U.S., overseeing their near launch processing and checkout. In addition to government missions, KSC performed this service for commercial and foreign missions also, though non-U.S. government entities provided reimbursement. NASA also funded Cape Canaveral Space Force Station launch pad maintenance and launch vehicle improvements.

 

All this changed with the Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984, after which NASA only coordinated its own and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) ELV launches. Companies were able to "operate their own launch vehicles" and utilize NASA's launch facilities. Payload processing handled by private firms also started to occur outside of KSC. Reagan's 1988 space policy furthered the movement of this work from KSC to commercial companies. That same year, launch complexes on Cape Canaveral Air Force Force Station started transferring from NASA to Air Force Space Command management.

 

In the 1990s, though KSC was not performing the hands-on ELV work, engineers still maintained an understanding of ELVs and had contracts allowing them insight into the vehicles so they could provide knowledgeable oversight. KSC also worked on ELV research and analysis and the contractors were able to utilize KSC personnel as a resource for technical issues. KSC, with the payload and launch vehicle industries, developed advances in automation of the ELV launch and ground operations to enable competitiveness of U.S. rockets against the global market.

 

In 1998, the Launch Services Program (LSP) formed at KSC, pulling together programs (and personnel) that already existed at KSC, GRC, Goddard Space Flight Center, and more to manage the launch of NASA and NOAA robotic missions. Cape Canaveral Space Force Station and VAFB are the primary launch sites for LSP missions, though other sites are occasionally used. LSP payloads such as the Mars Science Laboratory have been processed at KSC before being transferred to a launch pad on Cape Canaveral Space Force Station.

 

On 16 November 2022, at 06:47:44 UTC the Space Launch System (SLS) was launched from Complex 39B as part of the Artemis 1 mission.

 

As the International Space Station modules design began in the early 1990s, KSC began to work with other NASA centers and international partners to prepare for processing before launch onboard the Space Shuttles. KSC utilized its hands-on experience processing the 22 Spacelab missions in the Operations and Checkout Building to gather expectations of ISS processing. These experiences were incorporated into the design of the Space Station Processing Facility (SSPF), which began construction in 1991. The Space Station Directorate formed in 1996. KSC personnel were embedded at station module factories for insight into their processes.

 

From 1997 to 2007, KSC planned and performed on the ground integration tests and checkouts of station modules: three Multi-Element Integration Testing (MEIT) sessions and the Integration Systems Test (IST). Numerous issues were found and corrected that would have been difficult to nearly impossible to do on-orbit.

 

Today KSC continues to process ISS payloads from across the world before launch along with developing its experiments for on orbit. The proposed Lunar Gateway would be manufactured and processed at the Space Station Processing Facility.

 

The following are current programs and initiatives at Kennedy Space Center:

Commercial Crew Program

Exploration Ground Systems Program

NASA is currently designing the next heavy launch vehicle known as the Space Launch System (SLS) for continuation of human spaceflight.

On December 5, 2014, NASA launched the first uncrewed flight test of the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV), currently under development to facilitate human exploration of the Moon and Mars.

Launch Services Program

Educational Launch of Nanosatellites (ELaNa)

Research and Technology

Artemis program

Lunar Gateway

International Space Station Payloads

Camp KSC: educational camps for schoolchildren in spring and summer, with a focus on space, aviation and robotics.

 

The KSC Industrial Area, where many of the center's support facilities are located, is 5 miles (8 km) south of LC-39. It includes the Headquarters Building, the Operations and Checkout Building and the Central Instrumentation Facility. The astronaut crew quarters are in the O&C; before it was completed, the astronaut crew quarters were located in Hangar S at the Cape Canaveral Missile Test Annex (now Cape Canaveral Space Force Station). Located at KSC was the Merritt Island Spaceflight Tracking and Data Network station (MILA), a key radio communications and spacecraft tracking complex.

 

Facilities at the Kennedy Space Center are directly related to its mission to launch and recover missions. Facilities are available to prepare and maintain spacecraft and payloads for flight. The Headquarters (HQ) Building houses offices for the Center Director, library, film and photo archives, a print shop and security. When the KSC Library first opened, it was part of the Army Ballistic Missile Agency. However, in 1965, the library moved into three separate sections in the newly opened NASA headquarters before eventually becoming a single unit in 1970. The library contains over four million items related to the history and the work at Kennedy. As one of ten NASA center libraries in the country, their collection focuses on engineering, science, and technology. The archives contain planning documents, film reels, and original photographs covering the history of KSC. The library is not open to the public but is available for KSC, Space Force, and Navy employees who work on site. Many of the media items from the collection are digitized and available through NASA's KSC Media Gallery Archived December 6, 2020, at the Wayback Machine or through their more up-to-date Flickr gallery.

 

A new Headquarters Building was completed in 2019 as part of the Central Campus consolidation. Groundbreaking began in 2014.

 

The center operated its own 17-mile (27 km) short-line railroad. This operation was discontinued in 2015, with the sale of its final two locomotives. A third had already been donated to a museum. The line was costing $1.3 million annually to maintain.

 

The Neil Armstrong Operations and Checkout Building (O&C) (previously known as the Manned Spacecraft Operations Building) is a historic site on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places dating back to the 1960s and was used to receive, process, and integrate payloads for the Gemini and Apollo programs, the Skylab program in the 1970s, and for initial segments of the International Space Station through the 1990s. The Apollo and Space Shuttle astronauts would board the astronaut transfer van to launch complex 39 from the O&C building.

The three-story, 457,000-square-foot (42,500 m2) Space Station Processing Facility (SSPF) consists of two enormous processing bays, an airlock, operational control rooms, laboratories, logistics areas and office space for support of non-hazardous Space Station and Shuttle payloads to ISO 14644-1 class 5 standards. Opened in 1994, it is the largest factory building in the KSC industrial area.

The Vertical Processing Facility (VPF) features a 71-by-38-foot (22 by 12 m) door where payloads that are processed in the vertical position are brought in and manipulated with two overhead cranes and a hoist capable of lifting up to 35 short tons (32 t).

The Hypergolic Maintenance and Checkout Area (HMCA) comprises three buildings that are isolated from the rest of the industrial area because of the hazardous materials handled there. Hypergolic-fueled modules that made up the Space Shuttle Orbiter's reaction control system, orbital maneuvering system and auxiliary power units were stored and serviced in the HMCF.

The Multi-Payload Processing Facility is a 19,647 square feet (1,825.3 m2) building used for Orion spacecraft and payload processing.

The Payload Hazardous Servicing Facility (PHSF) contains a 70-by-110-foot (21 by 34 m) service bay, with a 100,000-pound (45,000 kg), 85-foot (26 m) hook height. It also contains a 58-by-80-foot (18 by 24 m) payload airlock. Its temperature is maintained at 70 °F (21 °C).[55]

The Blue Origin rocket manufacturing facility is located immediately south of the KSC visitor complex. Completed in 2019, it serves as the company's factory for the manufacture of New Glenn orbital rockets.

 

Launch Complex 39 (LC-39) was originally built for the Saturn V, the largest and most powerful operational launch vehicle until the Space Launch System, for the Apollo crewed Moon landing program. Since the end of the Apollo program in 1972, LC-39 has been used to launch every NASA human space flight, including Skylab (1973), the Apollo–Soyuz Test Project (1975), and the Space Shuttle program (1981–2011).

 

Since December 1968, all launch operations have been conducted from launch pads A and B at LC-39. Both pads are on the ocean, 3 miles (4.8 km) east of the VAB. From 1969 to 1972, LC-39 was the "Moonport" for all six Apollo crewed Moon landing missions using the Saturn V, and was used from 1981 to 2011 for all Space Shuttle launches.

 

Human missions to the Moon required the large three-stage Saturn V rocket, which was 363 feet (111 meters) tall and 33 feet (10 meters) in diameter. At KSC, Launch Complex 39 was built on Merritt Island to accommodate the new rocket. Construction of the $800 million project began in November 1962. LC-39 pads A and B were completed by October 1965 (planned Pads C, D and E were canceled), the VAB was completed in June 1965, and the infrastructure by late 1966.

 

The complex includes: the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB), a 130,000,000 cubic feet (3,700,000 m3) hangar capable of holding four Saturn Vs. The VAB was the largest structure in the world by volume when completed in 1965.

a transporter capable of carrying 5,440 tons along a crawlerway to either of two launch pads;

a 446-foot (136 m) mobile service structure, with three Mobile Launcher Platforms, each containing a fixed launch umbilical tower;

the Launch Control Center; and

a news media facility.

 

Launch Complex 48 (LC-48) is a multi-user launch site under construction for small launchers and spacecraft. It will be located between Launch Complex 39A and Space Launch Complex 41, with LC-39A to the north and SLC-41 to the south. LC-48 will be constructed as a "clean pad" to support multiple launch systems with differing propellant needs. While initially only planned to have a single pad, the complex is capable of being expanded to two at a later date.

 

As a part of promoting commercial space industry growth in the area and the overall center as a multi-user spaceport, KSC leases some of its properties. Here are some major examples:

 

Exploration Park to multiple users (partnership with Space Florida)

Shuttle Landing Facility to Space Florida (who contracts use to private companies)

Orbiter Processing Facility (OPF)-3 to Boeing (for CST-100 Starliner)

Launch Complex 39A, Launch Control Center Firing Room 4 and land for SpaceX's Roberts Road facility (Hanger X) to SpaceX

O&C High Bay to Lockheed Martin (for Orion processing)

Land for FPL's Space Coast Next Generation Solar Energy Center to Florida Power and Light (FPL)

Hypergolic Maintenance Facility (HMF) to United Paradyne Corporation (UPC)

 

The Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex, operated by Delaware North since 1995, has a variety of exhibits, artifacts, displays and attractions on the history and future of human and robotic spaceflight. Bus tours of KSC originate from here. The complex also includes the separate Apollo/Saturn V Center, north of the VAB and the United States Astronaut Hall of Fame, six miles west near Titusville. There were 1.5 million visitors in 2009. It had some 700 employees.

 

It was announced on May 29, 2015, that the Astronaut Hall of Fame exhibit would be moved from its current location to another location within the Visitor Complex to make room for an upcoming high-tech attraction entitled "Heroes and Legends". The attraction, designed by Orlando-based design firm Falcon's Treehouse, opened November 11, 2016.

 

In March 2016, the visitor center unveiled the new location of the iconic countdown clock at the complex's entrance; previously, the clock was located with a flagpole at the press site. The clock was originally built and installed in 1969 and listed with the flagpole in the National Register of Historic Places in January 2000. In 2019, NASA celebrated the 50th anniversary of the Apollo program, and the launch of Apollo 10 on May 18. In summer of 2019, Lunar Module 9 (LM-9) was relocated to the Apollo/Saturn V Center as part of an initiative to rededicate the center and celebrate the 50th anniversary of the Apollo Program.

 

Historic locations

NASA lists the following Historic Districts at KSC; each district has multiple associated facilities:

 

Launch Complex 39: Pad A Historic District

Launch Complex 39: Pad B Historic District

Shuttle Landing Facility (SLF) Area Historic District

Orbiter Processing Historic District

Solid Rocket Booster (SRB) Disassembly and Refurbishment Complex Historic District

NASA KSC Railroad System Historic District

NASA-owned Cape Canaveral Space Force Station Industrial Area Historic District

There are 24 historic properties outside of these historic districts, including the Space Shuttle Atlantis, Vehicle Assembly Building, Crawlerway, and Operations and Checkout Building.[71] KSC has one National Historic Landmark, 78 National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) listed or eligible sites, and 100 Archaeological Sites.

 

Further information: John F. Kennedy Space Center MPS

Other facilities

The Rotation, Processing and Surge Facility (RPSF) is responsible for the preparation of solid rocket booster segments for transportation to the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB). The RPSF was built in 1984 to perform SRB operations that had previously been conducted in high bays 2 and 4 of the VAB at the beginning of the Space Shuttle program. It was used until the Space Shuttle's retirement, and will be used in the future by the Space Launch System[75] (SLS) and OmegA rockets.

GOVERNOR JUSTICE PROCLAIMS NATIONAL SCHOOL BREAKFAST WEEK IN WEST VIRGINIA

  

CHARLESTON, W.Va. - Gov. Jim Justice today proclaimed the week of March 6-10, 2017 as national school breakfast week in West Virginia. This year’s theme, “Take the School Breakfast Challenge,” encourages parents, students and school officials to start their morning with a healthy breakfast to provide an energizing start to the day.

 

During the ceremony, Justice, along with West Virginia Superintendent of Schools, Dr. Michael Martirano, West Virginia School Nutrition Association President, Chris Derico, Roberta Hodsdon with USDA and West Virginia student ambassador, Miranda Pate from Hurricane High School signed the school breakfast pledge, vowing to eat a healthy breakfast every day.

   

“Breakfast is the most important meal of the day for all of us, but especially for our kids,” said Governor Jim Justice. “It fuels their learning experience and ability to achieve. However, we are told that more than half of our school children don’t eat breakfast and that is a significant problem. Hungry children are more likely to have discipline problems, lower grades and are more likely to be tardy or absent. So making sure our kids eat a healthy breakfast is a top priority.”

  

The West Virginia Feed to Achieve Act, recently signed into law, emphasizes all Mountain State students have adequate time and availability for school breakfast. As a result, more than 2.9 million school breakfasts are served monthly to students at more than 700 schools and feeding sites throughout West Virginia.

 

The Food Research and Action Center (FRAC) has ranked West Virginia first in the nation in school breakfast participation for three years in a row. West Virginia schools implement innovative breakfast strategies such as breakfast in the classroom and grab and go breakfast that allow every student to have easy access to a healthy meal to start their day.

 

“Children perform at their best when they receive proper nutrition," Martirano said. “The School Breakfast Program is an important tool for educators to ensure that students receive adequate nutrition to learn and thrive so they are not distracted in the classroom.”

   

Students who participate in school breakfast exhibit decreased behavioral and psychological problems and have lower rates of absence and tardiness. West Virginia receives up to $5 million per month in federal reimbursement statewide for breakfast participation.

 

About National School Breakfast Week

National School Breakfast Week was launched in 1989 to raise awareness of the availability of the School Breakfast Program to all children and to promote the links between eating a good breakfast, academic achievement and healthy lifestyles. The “Take the School Breakfast Challenge” is made possible by the nonprofit School Nutrition Association, Kellogg’s and Potatoes USA. To learn more, visit: schoolnutrition.org/Meetings/Events/NSBW/2017/.

Governor Abercrombie signed the following bills:

 

House Bill 2052 (Relating to Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) increases access to Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) by updating references from “physicians orders for life-sustaining treatment” to “provider orders for life-sustaining treatment.” The measure also expands health care provider signatory authority to include advance practice registered nurses and corrects inconsistencies of terms describing who may sign a POLST form on behalf of a patient.

 

House Bill 1616 (Relating to Health Planning) adds to the Hawaii State Planning Act’s objectives and policies for health, the identification of social determinants of health and prioritization of programs, services, interventions, and activities that address identified social determinants of health to improve Native Hawaiian health in accordance with federal law and reduce health disparities of disproportionately affected demographics.

 

House Bill 1723 (Relating to Psychiatric Facilities) amends the notice requirements for the discharge of an involuntary patient committed pursuant to legal proceeding involving fitness to proceed and requires the family court to conduct a timely hearing prior to the termination of a standing commitment order.

 

House Bill 2320 (Relating to Health) establishes health equity as a goal for the DOH and requires the DOH to consider social determinants of health in assessing health needs in the state. The measure is known as “Loretta’s Law” for the late DOH Director Loretta Fuddy, who was passionate proponent.

 

House Bill 2581 (Relating to Insurance) establishes the State Innovation Waiver Task Force and requires the task force to submit two interim reports and a final report to the legislature.

 

Senate Bill 2469 (Relating to Telehealth) requires equivalent reimbursement for services, including behavioral health services, provided through telehealth as for the same services provided via face-to-face contact between a health care provider and a patient. The measure also clarifies that health care providers for purposes of telehealth include primary care providers, mental health providers, oral health providers, physicians and osteopathic physicians, advanced practice registered nurses, psychologists, and dentists. For consistency purposes, the bill changes statutory references of “telemedicine” to “telehealth.”

 

House Bill 2400 (Relating to Temporary Disability Benefits) provides temporary disability benefits to employees who suffer disabilities as a result of donating organs.

 

Senate Bill 1233 (Relating to Leaves of Absence) requires certain private employers to allow employees to take leaves of absence for organ, bone marrow, or peripheral blood stem cell donation. Unused sick leave, vacation, or paid time off, or unpaid time off, may be used for these leaves of absence. The measure also requires employers to restore an employee returning from leave to the same or equivalent position and establishes a private right of action for employees seeking enforcement of provisions.

VA Headquarters in Washington, DC

 

"To care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow, and his orphan." -A. Lincoln

 

- - - - -

 

Used on home page of Federal Register ("Reimbursement Offsets for Medical Care or Services" - A Proposed Rule by Veterans Affairs Department - October 8, 2010) at www.federalregister.gov/

 

Used by Federal Register ("Fund Availability Under the Supportive Services for Veteran " - A Notice by Veterans Affairs Department - December 17, 2010) at www.federalregister.gov/money

 

Used on home page of Federal Register ("Dependency and Indemnity Compensation Benefits" - A Rule by Veterans Affairs Department - July 10, 2012) at www.federalregister.gov/

 

Used on home page of Federal Register ("Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance-Stillborn Child Coverage" - A Rule by Veterans Affairs Department - November 26, 2012) at www.federalregister.gov/

 

Blogged at www.ukinsuranceonline.co.uk/laptop-insurance/nice-life-in...

 

Blogged by Blue Coat ("Avoid Cyber Risk: 7 Major Global Security Breaches" - December 3, 2013) at bluecoat.com/company-blog/2013-12-03/avoid-cyber-risk-7-m...

 

Blogged by VICE News ("Shinseki’s Head Has Rolled, but the 'Scandal' Playbook Is Not Good Enough for Vets" by Natasha Lennard - May 30, 2014) at news.vice.com/article/shinsekis-head-has-rolled-but-the-s...

 

Used by The American Homefront Project ("A lawsuit alleges a racial disparity in VA benefits and says the VA isn't doing enough about it" - December 14, 2022) at americanhomefront.wunc.org/news/2022-12-14/a-lawsuit-alle...

 

Used by St. Louis Public Radio ("A lawsuit alleges a racial disparity in VA benefits and says the VA isn't doing enough about it" - December 16, 2022) at news.stlpublicradio.org/health-science-environment/2022-1...

 

Used by Texas Standard ("A lawsuit alleges a racial disparity in VA benefits and says the VA isn’t doing enough about it" by Desiree D'Iorio" - January 2, 2023) at www.texasstandard.org/stories/a-lawsuit-alleges-a-racial-...

 

Used by North Country Public Radio ("A lawsuit alleges a racial disparity in VA benefits and says the VA isn't doing enough about it" by Desiree D'Iorio (WSHU) - January 30, 2023) at www.northcountrypublicradio.org/news/story/47201/20230130...

 

Used by BankInfoSecurity.com ("VA: Contractors Have 1 Hour to Report a Security Incident" by Marianne Kolbasuk McGee - January 24, 2023) at www.bankinfosecurity.com/va-contractors-have-one-hour-to-...

 

Used by tipp insights ("Servicemembers Come Home Only To Find Themselves In A New Hell — The VA’s Cold Bureaucracy" - March 7, 2025) at tippinsights.com/servicemembers-come-home-only-to-find-th...

 

Used by tipp insights ("Department of Veterans Affairs To No Longer Provide Gender Transition Procedures" - March 21, 2025) at tippinsights.com/department-of-veterans-affairs-to-no-lon...

Designer unknown (佚名)

1985

The State Council has decided to shorten the reimbursement period to five years from 1985

Guowuyuan jueding cong 1985 nian kaishi suoduan changhuan nianxian wei wu nian (国务院决定从1985年开始缩短偿还年限为五年)

Call nr.: PC-1985-016 (Private collection)

 

Published in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region.

 

More? See: chineseposters.net

GOVERNOR JUSTICE PROCLAIMS NATIONAL SCHOOL BREAKFAST WEEK IN WEST VIRGINIA

  

CHARLESTON, W.Va. - Gov. Jim Justice today proclaimed the week of March 6-10, 2017 as national school breakfast week in West Virginia. This year’s theme, “Take the School Breakfast Challenge,” encourages parents, students and school officials to start their morning with a healthy breakfast to provide an energizing start to the day.

 

During the ceremony, Justice, along with West Virginia Superintendent of Schools, Dr. Michael Martirano, West Virginia School Nutrition Association President, Chris Derico, Roberta Hodsdon with USDA and West Virginia student ambassador, Miranda Pate from Hurricane High School signed the school breakfast pledge, vowing to eat a healthy breakfast every day.

   

“Breakfast is the most important meal of the day for all of us, but especially for our kids,” said Governor Jim Justice. “It fuels their learning experience and ability to achieve. However, we are told that more than half of our school children don’t eat breakfast and that is a significant problem. Hungry children are more likely to have discipline problems, lower grades and are more likely to be tardy or absent. So making sure our kids eat a healthy breakfast is a top priority.”

  

The West Virginia Feed to Achieve Act, recently signed into law, emphasizes all Mountain State students have adequate time and availability for school breakfast. As a result, more than 2.9 million school breakfasts are served monthly to students at more than 700 schools and feeding sites throughout West Virginia.

 

The Food Research and Action Center (FRAC) has ranked West Virginia first in the nation in school breakfast participation for three years in a row. West Virginia schools implement innovative breakfast strategies such as breakfast in the classroom and grab and go breakfast that allow every student to have easy access to a healthy meal to start their day.

 

“Children perform at their best when they receive proper nutrition," Martirano said. “The School Breakfast Program is an important tool for educators to ensure that students receive adequate nutrition to learn and thrive so they are not distracted in the classroom.”

   

Students who participate in school breakfast exhibit decreased behavioral and psychological problems and have lower rates of absence and tardiness. West Virginia receives up to $5 million per month in federal reimbursement statewide for breakfast participation.

 

About National School Breakfast Week

National School Breakfast Week was launched in 1989 to raise awareness of the availability of the School Breakfast Program to all children and to promote the links between eating a good breakfast, academic achievement and healthy lifestyles. The “Take the School Breakfast Challenge” is made possible by the nonprofit School Nutrition Association, Kellogg’s and Potatoes USA. To learn more, visit: schoolnutrition.org/Meetings/Events/NSBW/2017/.

In just six months, the largest tax hikes in the history of America will take effect. They will hit families and small businesses in three great waves on January 1, 2011:

 

First Wave: Expiration of 2001 and 2003 Tax Relief

  

In 2001 and 2003, the GOP Congress enacted several tax cuts for investors, small business owners, and families. These will all expire on January 1, 2011:

 

Personal income tax rates will rise. The top income tax rate will rise from 35 to 39.6 percent (this is also the rate at which two-thirds of small business profits are taxed). The lowest rate will rise from 10 to 15 percent. All the rates in between will also rise. Itemized deductions and personal exemptions will again phase out, which has the same mathematical effect as higher marginal tax rates. The full list of marginal rate hikes is below:

 

- The 10% bracket rises to an expanded 15%

- The 25% bracket rises to 28%

- The 28% bracket rises to 31%

- The 33% bracket rises to 36%

- The 35% bracket rises to 39.6%

 

Higher taxes on marriage and family. The “marriage penalty” (narrower tax brackets for married couples) will return from the first dollar of income. The child tax credit will be cut in half from $1000 to $500 per child. The standard deduction will no longer be doubled for married couples relative to the single level. The dependent care and adoption tax credits will be cut.

  

The return of the Death Tax. This year, there is no death tax. For those dying on or after January 1 2011, there is a 55 percent top death tax rate on estates over $1 million. A person leaving behind two homes and a retirement account could easily pass along a death tax bill to their loved ones.

 

Higher tax rates on savers and investors. The capital gains tax will rise from 15 percent this year to 20 percent in 2011. The dividends tax will rise from 15 percent this year to 39.6 percent in 2011. These rates will rise another 3.8 percent in 2013.

    

Second Wave: Obamacare

 

There are over twenty new or higher taxes in Obamacare. Several will first go into effect on January 1, 2011. They include:

 

The “Medicine Cabinet Tax” Thanks to Obamacare, Americans will no longer be able to use health savings account (HSA), flexible spending account (FSA), or health reimbursement (HRA) pre-tax dollars to purchase non-prescription, over-the-counter medicines (except insulin).

 

The “Special Needs Kids Tax” This provision of Obamacare imposes a cap on flexible spending accounts (FSAs) of $2500 (Currently, there is no federal government limit). There is one group of FSA owners for whom this new cap will be particularly cruel and onerous: parents of special needs children. There are thousands of families with special needs children in the United States, and many of them use FSAs to pay for special needs education. Tuition rates at one leading school that teaches special needs children in Washington, D.C. (National Child Research Center) can easily exceed $14,000 per year. Under tax rules, FSA dollars can be used to pay for this type of special needs education.

  

The HSA Withdrawal Tax Hike. This provision of Obamacare increases the additional tax on non-medical early withdrawals from an HSA from 10 to 20 percent, disadvantaging them relative to IRAs and other tax-advantaged accounts, which remain at 10 percent.

   

Third Wave: The Alternative Minimum Tax and Employer Tax Hikes

 

When Americans prepare to file their tax returns in January of 2011, they’ll be in for a nasty surprise—the AMT won’t be held harmless, and many tax relief provisions will have expired. The major items include:

 

The AMT will ensnare over 28 million families, up from 4 million last year. According to the left-leaning Tax Policy Center, Congress’ failure to index the AMT will lead to an explosion of AMT taxpaying families—rising from 4 million last year to 28.5 million. These families will have to calculate their tax burdens twice, and pay taxes at the higher level. The AMT was created in 1969 to ensnare a handful of taxpayers.

 

Small business expensing will be slashed and 50% expensing will disappear. Small businesses can normally expense (rather than slowly-deduct, or “depreciate”) equipment purchases up to $250,000. This will be cut all the way down to $25,000. Larger businesses can expense half of their purchases of equipment. In January of 2011, all of it will have to be “depreciated.”

 

Taxes will be raised on all types of businesses. There are literally scores of tax hikes on business that will take place. The biggest is the loss of the “research and experimentation tax credit,” but there are many, many others. Combining high marginal tax rates with the loss of this tax relief will cost jobs.

 

Tax Benefits for Education and Teaching Reduced. The deduction for tuition and fees will not be available. Tax credits for education will be limited. Teachers will no longer be able to deduct classroom expenses. Coverdell Education Savings Accounts will be cut. Employer-provided educational assistance is curtailed. The student loan interest deduction will be disallowed for hundreds of thousands of families.

 

Charitable Contributions from IRAs no longer allowed. Under current law, a retired person with an IRA can contribute up to $100,000 per year directly to a charity from their IRA. This contribution also counts toward an annual “required minimum distribution.” This ability will no longer be there.

 

Read more: www.atr.org/sixmonths.html?content=5171#ixzz0sckPQrzN

 

Governor Abercrombie signed the following bills:

 

House Bill 2052 (Relating to Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) increases access to Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) by updating references from “physicians orders for life-sustaining treatment” to “provider orders for life-sustaining treatment.” The measure also expands health care provider signatory authority to include advance practice registered nurses and corrects inconsistencies of terms describing who may sign a POLST form on behalf of a patient.

 

House Bill 1616 (Relating to Health Planning) adds to the Hawaii State Planning Act’s objectives and policies for health, the identification of social determinants of health and prioritization of programs, services, interventions, and activities that address identified social determinants of health to improve Native Hawaiian health in accordance with federal law and reduce health disparities of disproportionately affected demographics.

 

House Bill 1723 (Relating to Psychiatric Facilities) amends the notice requirements for the discharge of an involuntary patient committed pursuant to legal proceeding involving fitness to proceed and requires the family court to conduct a timely hearing prior to the termination of a standing commitment order.

 

House Bill 2320 (Relating to Health) establishes health equity as a goal for the DOH and requires the DOH to consider social determinants of health in assessing health needs in the state. The measure is known as “Loretta’s Law” for the late DOH Director Loretta Fuddy, who was passionate proponent.

 

House Bill 2581 (Relating to Insurance) establishes the State Innovation Waiver Task Force and requires the task force to submit two interim reports and a final report to the legislature.

 

Senate Bill 2469 (Relating to Telehealth) requires equivalent reimbursement for services, including behavioral health services, provided through telehealth as for the same services provided via face-to-face contact between a health care provider and a patient. The measure also clarifies that health care providers for purposes of telehealth include primary care providers, mental health providers, oral health providers, physicians and osteopathic physicians, advanced practice registered nurses, psychologists, and dentists. For consistency purposes, the bill changes statutory references of “telemedicine” to “telehealth.”

 

House Bill 2400 (Relating to Temporary Disability Benefits) provides temporary disability benefits to employees who suffer disabilities as a result of donating organs.

 

Senate Bill 1233 (Relating to Leaves of Absence) requires certain private employers to allow employees to take leaves of absence for organ, bone marrow, or peripheral blood stem cell donation. Unused sick leave, vacation, or paid time off, or unpaid time off, may be used for these leaves of absence. The measure also requires employers to restore an employee returning from leave to the same or equivalent position and establishes a private right of action for employees seeking enforcement of provisions.

Wall memorial by E Gaffin, with a shield between mourning cherubs on the south chancel wall :

"To the memory of Mary the wife of John Thomas Atkyns esqr, and daughter of Edward Atkyns esqr of Ketteringham Hall. This melancholy tribute of affection and esteem was erected in grateful remembrance by her son in law Nathaniel William Peach esq MP.

She died the 23rd of November 1829 aged 68 and was buried at Burnham in the county of Bucks"

 

Mary was the daughter of Jacob Rigail, a Russian merchant,

She m John Thomas Atkyns (later Wright) +++ (1758-1822) 2nd son of Edward Atkyns 1753 & Dorothy, daughter of John Wright of Oxford - John Thomas inherited the Oxford estate of his uncle John Wright and took additional name of Wright in March 1797

having 1 daughter

1. Harriot 1825 m 1824 (2nd wife) Nathaniel William Peach flic.kr/p/wbqdjj son of Nathaniel Peach (1749-1788) & Julia Maria Keasberry (1763 /1769 -1849) William was the widower of Elizabeth Goodman 1782 - 1709 and the father of several children

 

Whilst looking after his eldest son Edward, ===, John Thomas's his father Edward left his Gloucestershire property to trustees for the benefit of his younger children, of whom the survivors were John & Mary . They did better than expected from this provision, because in 1770 the trustees unexpectedly came into the family's Lower Swell estate, and the way Edward's will was drawn meant it passed to the younger children and not to his elder son (who went to law over it and lost). His other property, Pinbury was sold to Lord Bathurst's growing Cirencester estate in 1786 or 1788, and Lower Swell passed to John Atkyns Wright +++ , who pulled down the family home and replaced it with a farmhouse.

Eldest son Edward Atkyns (1757-94) === m 1779 actress, Charlotte Walpole (1758-1836), but finding she was not accepted by Norfolk society, and being pressed by creditors, he moved to France, where they seem to have gained an entrée to court circles. When the French Revolution began they left Paris and moved to Lille, and then in 1791 returned to England. Charlotte in particular was much exercised by the plight of the French royal family and aristocracy, and after her husband's death she raised mortgages on the Ketteringham estate to enable her to maintain efforts to assist aristocratic French émigrés. When the French monarchy was re-established in 1814, she petitioned King Louis XVIII for reimbursement of more than £30,000 she claimed to have spent on this cause, but he was unable to afford to repay at a time of financial austerity. Charlotte turned instead to her sister-in-law, Mary Atkyns +++ who paid off the mortgages, and settled an annuity on her in return for title to the Ketteringham estate. (Edward & Charlotte's only child Wright Atkins had died without heirs aged 24 www.flickr.com/gp/52219527@N00/1dL0E7 )

Mary then settled Ketteringham on her own daughter, Harriot Atkyns, when she married Nathaniel William Peach MP (1785-1835) in 1824. www.flickr.com/gp/52219527@N00/671C8B Sadly, Harriot died the following year, but Nathaniel retained the Ketteringham estate until his death, after which it passed to his son William by his 1st marriage, who sold it in 1836 for £80,000. - Church of St Peter, Ketteringham, Norfolk

U.S. Senator Claire McCaskill, the top-ranking Democrat on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, today released the first product of her wide-ranging investigation into opioid manufacturers and distributors. “Fueling an Epidemic: Insys Therapeutics and the Systemic Manipulation of Prior Authorization” describes the emphasis Insys Therapeutics put on boosting approvals for its highly addictive fentanyl drug Subsys, even for inappropriate, off-label uses, and details an audio recording in which an Insys sales representative misidentifies herself and uses language designed to circumvent the prior authorization process.

 

Insurers often employ this process to prevent the overprescription and abuse of powerful and expensive drugs like Subsys. While the Food and Drug Administration has only approved Subsys for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain—cancer pain that persists despite attempted treatment with other opioid medications—an internal document obtained by McCaskill shows that Insys lacked measures to prevent its representatives from manipulating the prior authorization process and gaining approval for Subsys treatment of non-cancer conditions like back pain, fibromyalgia and migraine headaches.

 

“There is extensive evidence that Insys aggressively pressured its employees and the entire medical system to increase the use of a fentanyl product during a national epidemic that was taking the lives of tens of thousands of Americans a year in order to make more money—it’s hard to imagine anything more despicable,” McCaskill said. “Their attempts to manipulate the prescription approval process for this drug appear to have been systemic, and anyone responsible for this manipulation deserves to be prosecuted.”

 

As part of its investigation, the minority staff received an audio recording of conversations between an Insys employee and pharmacy benefit manager representatives related to a Subsys prescription for Sarah Fuller, who later died from an alleged fentanyl overdose. This recording suggests the Insys employee in question repeatedly misled Envision Pharmaceutical Services to obtain approval for Ms. Fuller’s Subsys treatment—heavily implying she was employed by the prescribing physician and misrepresenting the type of pain the patient was experiencing.

 

The call occurred during a period in which Insys was aggressively pressuring its employees to increase their ratio of approvals. Employees reportedly received significant financial incentives and management pressure—including quotas and group and individual bonuses—to boost the rate of Subsys authorizations. “In an internal presentation dated 2012 and entitled, “2013 SUBSYS Brand Plan,” Insys identified one of six “key strategic imperatives” as “Mitigate Prior Authorization barriers,” the report notes. “On a later slide, the company identified several tasks associated with this effort, including “Build internal [prior authorization] assistance infrastructure,” “Establish an internal 1-800 reimbursement assistance hotline,” and “Educate field force on [prior authorization] process and facilitation.”

 

Subsys—a fentanyl sublingual spray product approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2012 to treat breakthrough cancer pain—can cost over $20,000 per month, and proved incredibly successful financially after its introduction to the market. Insys had “the best-performing initial public offering in 2013,” and, over the next two years, revenues tripled and profits rose 45%. The value of company stock increased 296% between 2013 and 2016.

 

McCaskill has previously requested information related to sales and marketing materials, internal addiction studies, details on compliance with government settlements and donations to third party advocacy groups from major opioid manufacturers. She recently expanded her investigation, requesting documents and information from opioid manufacturers Mallinckrodt, Endo, Teva, and Allergan, while a request to McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, and Cardinal Health, Inc., focused on their distribution of opioid products.

 

When McCaskill was ranking member of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, she joined Subcommittee Chairman Rob Portman to launch an investigation into the role Medicare Part D entities, private insurers, and pharmacy benefit managers play in detecting, reporting, and addressing opioid abuse, resulting in the in-depth report, “Combatting the Opioid Epidemic: A Review of Anti-Abuse Efforts in Medicare and Private Health Insurance Systems.”

 

Visit www.mccaskill.senate.gov/opioid-investigation to learn more about McCaskill’s investigation.

The United States Astronaut Hall of Fame, located inside the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex Heroes & Legends building on Merritt Island, Florida, honors American astronauts and features the world's largest collection of their personal memorabilia, focusing on those astronauts who have been inducted into the Hall. Exhibits include Wally Schirra's Sigma 7 space capsule from the fifth crewed Mercury mission and the Gemini IX spacecraft flown by Gene Cernan and Thomas P. Stafford in 1966.

 

In the 1980s, the six then-surviving Mercury Seven astronauts conceived of establishing a place where US space travelers could be remembered and honored, along the lines of halls of fame for other fields. The Mercury Seven Foundation and Astronaut Scholarship Foundation were formed, and have a role in the ongoing operations of the Hall of Fame. The foundation's first executive director was former Associated Press space reporter Howard Benedict.

 

The Astronaut Hall of Fame was opened on October 29, 1990, by the U.S. Space Camp Foundation, which was the first owner of the facility. It was located next to the Florida branch of Space Camp.

 

The Hall of Fame closed for several months in 2002 when U.S. Space Camp Foundation's creditors foreclosed on the property due to low attendance and mounting debt. That September, an auction was held and the property was purchased by Delaware North Park Services on behalf of NASA and the property was added to the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex. The Hall of Fame re-opened December 14, 2002.

 

The Hall of Fame, which was originally located just west of the NASA Causeway, closed to the public on November 2, 2015, in preparation for its relocation to the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex 6 miles (9.7 km) to the east on Merritt Island. Outside of the original building was a full-scale replica of a Space Shuttle orbiter named Inspiration (originally named "Shuttle To Tomorrow" where visitors could enter and view a program). Inspiration served only as an outdoor, full scale, static display which visitors could not enter. After the Hall of Fame was transferred to the KSC Visitor Complex, Inspiration was acquired by LVX System and was placed in storage at the Shuttle Landing Facility at the Kennedy Space Center; in 2016, the shuttle was loaded on to a barge to be taken for refurbishment before going on an educational tour.

 

The building was purchased at auction by visitor complex operator Delaware North and renamed the ATX Center, and for a time housed educational programs including Camp Kennedy Space Center and the Astronaut Training Experience. Those programs have since been moved to the KSC Visitor Complex, and as of December 2019, the structure was being offered for lease. In July 2020, Lockheed Martin announced it would lease the building to support work on the NASA Orion crew capsule.

 

Inductees into the Hall of Fame are selected by a blue ribbon committee of former NASA officials and flight controllers, historians, journalists, and other space authorities (including former astronauts) based on their accomplishments in space or their contributions to the advancement of space exploration. Except for 2002, inductions have been held every year since 2001.

 

As its inaugural class in 1990, the Hall of Fame inducted the United States' original group of astronauts: the Mercury Seven. In addition to being the first American astronauts, they set several firsts in American spaceflight, both auspicious and tragic. Alan Shepard was the first American in space and later became one of the twelve people to walk on the Moon. John Glenn was the first American to orbit the Earth and after his induction went on, in 1998, to become the oldest man to fly in space, aged 77. Gus Grissom was the first American to fly in space twice and was the commander of the ill-fated Apollo 1, which resulted in the first astronaut deaths directly related to preparation for spaceflight.

 

Thirteen astronauts from the Gemini and Apollo programs were inducted in the second class of 1993. This class included the first and last humans to walk on the Moon, Neil Armstrong and Eugene Cernan; Ed White, the first American to walk in space (also killed in the Apollo 1 accident); Jim Lovell, commander of the famously near-tragic Apollo 13; and John Young, whose six flights included a moonwalk and command of the first Space Shuttle mission.

 

The third class was inducted in 1997 and consisted of the 24 additional Apollo, Skylab, and ASTP astronauts. Notable members of the class were Roger Chaffee, the third astronaut killed in the Apollo 1 fire and the only unflown astronaut in the Hall; Harrison Schmitt, the first scientist and next-to-last person to walk on the Moon; and Jack Swigert and Fred Haise, the Apollo 13 crewmembers not previously inducted.

 

The philosophy regarding the first three groups of inductees was that all astronauts who flew in NASA's "pioneering" programs (which would include Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, Apollo Applications Program (Skylab), and Apollo-Soyuz Test Project) would be included simply by virtue of their participation in a spaceflight in these early programs. The first group (the inaugural class of 1990) would only include the original Mercury astronauts (most of whom would go on to fly in later programs). The second group of inductees would include those astronauts who began their spaceflight careers during Gemini (all of whom would go on to fly in later programs). The third group of inductees would include those astronauts who began their spaceflight careers during Apollo, Skylab, and ASTP (some of whom would go on to fly in the Space Shuttle program). Since it would not be practical (or meaningful) to induct all astronauts who ever flew in space, all subsequent inductees (Space Shuttle program and beyond) are considered based on their accomplishments and contributions to the human spaceflight endeavor which would set them apart from their peers.

 

Over four dozen astronauts from the Space Shuttle program have been inducted since 2001. Among these are Sally Ride, the first American woman in space; Story Musgrave, who flew six missions in the 1980s and 90s; and Francis Scobee, commander of the ill-fated final Challenger mission.

 

The 2010 class consisted of Guion Bluford Jr., Kenneth Bowersox, Frank Culbertson and Kathryn Thornton. The 2011 inductees were Karol Bobko and Susan Helms. The 2012 inductees were Franklin Chang-Diaz, Kevin Chilton and Charles Precourt. Bonnie Dunbar, Curt Brown and Eileen Collins were inducted in 2013, and Shannon Lucid and Jerry Ross comprised the 2014 class.

 

Those inducted in 2015 were John Grunsfeld, Steven Lindsey, Kent Rominger, and Rhea Seddon. In 2016, inductees included Brian Duffy and Scott E. Parazynski. Ellen Ochoa and Michael Foale were announced as the 2017 class of the United States Astronaut Hall of Fame. Scott Altman and Thomas Jones followed in 2018. The 2019 inductees were James Buchli and Janet L. Kavandi.

 

Michael López-Alegría, Scott Kelly and Pamela Melroy were the 2020 inductees, inducted in a November 2021 ceremony. The 2022 inductees were Christopher Ferguson, David Leestma, and Sandra Magnus. Roy Bridges Jr. and Mark Kelly were the 2023 inductees.

 

The Hall of Heroes is composed of tributes to the inductees. Among the Hall of Fame's displays is Sigma 7, the Mercury spacecraft piloted by Wally Schirra which orbited the Earth six times in 1962, and the Gemini 9A capsule flown by Gene Cernan and Thomas P. Stafford in 1966. An Astronaut Adventure room includes simulators for use by children.

 

The spacesuit worn by Gus Grissom during his 1961 Liberty Bell 7 Mercury flight is on display and has been the subject of a dispute between NASA and Grissom's heirs and supporters since 2002. The spacesuit, along with other Grissom artifacts, were loaned to the original owners of the Hall of Fame by the Grissom family when it opened. After the Hall of Fame went into bankruptcy and was taken over by a NASA contractor in 2002, the family requested that all their items be returned. All of the items were returned to Grissom's family except the spacesuit, because both NASA and the Grissoms claim ownership of it. NASA claims Grissom checked out the spacesuit for a show and tell at his son's school, and then never returned it, while the Grissoms claim Gus rescued the spacesuit from a scrap heap.

 

The John F. Kennedy Space Center (KSC, originally known as the NASA Launch Operations Center), located on Merritt Island, Florida, is one of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) ten field centers. Since December 1968, KSC has been NASA's primary launch center of human spaceflight. Launch operations for the Apollo, Skylab and Space Shuttle programs were carried out from Kennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39 and managed by KSC.[4] Located on the east coast of Florida, KSC is adjacent to Cape Canaveral Space Force Station (CCSFS). The management of the two entities work very closely together, share resources and operate facilities on each other's property.

 

Though the first Apollo flights and all Project Mercury and Project Gemini flights took off from the then-Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, the launches were managed by KSC and its previous organization, the Launch Operations Directorate. Starting with the fourth Gemini mission, the NASA launch control center in Florida (Mercury Control Center, later the Launch Control Center) began handing off control of the vehicle to the Mission Control Center in Houston, shortly after liftoff; in prior missions it held control throughout the entire mission.

 

Additionally, the center manages launch of robotic and commercial crew missions and researches food production and In-Situ Resource Utilization for off-Earth exploration. Since 2010, the center has worked to become a multi-user spaceport through industry partnerships, even adding a new launch pad (LC-39C) in 2015.

 

There are about 700 facilities and buildings grouped across the center's 144,000 acres (580 km2). Among the unique facilities at KSC are the 525-foot (160 m) tall Vehicle Assembly Building for stacking NASA's largest rockets, the Launch Control Center, which conducts space launches at KSC, the Operations and Checkout Building, which houses the astronauts dormitories and suit-up area, a Space Station factory, and a 3-mile (4.8 km) long Shuttle Landing Facility. There is also a Visitor Complex open to the public on site.

 

Since 1949, the military had been performing launch operations at what would become Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. In December 1959, the Department of Defense transferred 5,000 personnel and the Missile Firing Laboratory to NASA to become the Launch Operations Directorate under NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.

 

President John F. Kennedy's 1961 goal of a crewed lunar landing by 1970 required an expansion of launch operations. On July 1, 1962, the Launch Operations Directorate was separated from MSFC to become the Launch Operations Center (LOC). Also, Cape Canaveral was inadequate to host the new launch facility design required for the mammoth 363-foot (111 m) tall, 7,500,000-pound-force (33,000 kN) thrust Saturn V rocket, which would be assembled vertically in a large hangar and transported on a mobile platform to one of several launch pads. Therefore, the decision was made to build a new LOC site located adjacent to Cape Canaveral on Merritt Island.

 

NASA began land acquisition in 1962, buying title to 131 square miles (340 km2) and negotiating with the state of Florida for an additional 87 square miles (230 km2). The major buildings in KSC's Industrial Area were designed by architect Charles Luckman. Construction began in November 1962, and Kennedy visited the site twice in 1962, and again just a week before his assassination on November 22, 1963.

 

On November 29, 1963, the facility was given its current name by President Lyndon B. Johnson under Executive Order 11129. Johnson's order joined both the civilian LOC and the military Cape Canaveral station ("the facilities of Station No. 1 of the Atlantic Missile Range") under the designation "John F. Kennedy Space Center", spawning some confusion joining the two in the public mind. NASA Administrator James E. Webb clarified this by issuing a directive stating the Kennedy Space Center name applied only to the LOC, while the Air Force issued a general order renaming the military launch site Cape Kennedy Air Force Station.

 

Located on Merritt Island, Florida, the center is north-northwest of Cape Canaveral on the Atlantic Ocean, midway between Miami and Jacksonville on Florida's Space Coast, due east of Orlando. It is 34 miles (55 km) long and roughly six miles (9.7 km) wide, covering 219 square miles (570 km2). KSC is a major central Florida tourist destination and is approximately one hour's drive from the Orlando area. The Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex offers public tours of the center and Cape Canaveral Space Force Station.

 

The KSC Industrial Area, where many of the center's support facilities are located, is 5 miles (8 km) south of LC-39. It includes the Headquarters Building, the Operations and Checkout Building and the Central Instrumentation Facility. The astronaut crew quarters are in the O&C; before it was completed, the astronaut crew quarters were located in Hangar S[39] at the Cape Canaveral Missile Test Annex (now Cape Canaveral Space Force Station). Located at KSC was the Merritt Island Spaceflight Tracking and Data Network station (MILA), a key radio communications and spacecraft tracking complex.

 

Facilities at the Kennedy Space Center are directly related to its mission to launch and recover missions. Facilities are available to prepare and maintain spacecraft and payloads for flight. The Headquarters (HQ) Building houses offices for the Center Director, library, film and photo archives, a print shop and security. When the KSC Library first opened, it was part of the Army Ballistic Missile Agency. However, in 1965, the library moved into three separate sections in the newly opened NASA headquarters before eventually becoming a single unit in 1970. The library contains over four million items related to the history and the work at Kennedy. As one of ten NASA center libraries in the country, their collection focuses on engineering, science, and technology. The archives contain planning documents, film reels, and original photographs covering the history of KSC. The library is not open to the public but is available for KSC, Space Force, and Navy employees who work on site. Many of the media items from the collection are digitized and available through NASA's KSC Media Gallery or through their more up-to-date Flickr gallery.

 

A new Headquarters Building was completed in 2019 as part of the Central Campus consolidation. Groundbreaking began in 2014.

 

The center operated its own 17-mile (27 km) short-line railroad. This operation was discontinued in 2015, with the sale of its final two locomotives. A third had already been donated to a museum. The line was costing $1.3 million annually to maintain.

 

The Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex, operated by Delaware North since 1995, has a variety of exhibits, artifacts, displays and attractions on the history and future of human and robotic spaceflight. Bus tours of KSC originate from here. The complex also includes the separate Apollo/Saturn V Center, north of the VAB and the United States Astronaut Hall of Fame, six miles west near Titusville. There were 1.5 million visitors in 2009. It had some 700 employees.

 

It was announced on May 29, 2015, that the Astronaut Hall of Fame exhibit would be moved from its current location to another location within the Visitor Complex to make room for an upcoming high-tech attraction entitled "Heroes and Legends". The attraction, designed by Orlando-based design firm Falcon's Treehouse, opened November 11, 2016.

 

In March 2016, the visitor center unveiled the new location of the iconic countdown clock at the complex's entrance; previously, the clock was located with a flagpole at the press site. The clock was originally built and installed in 1969 and listed with the flagpole in the National Register of Historic Places in January 2000. In 2019, NASA celebrated the 50th anniversary of the Apollo program, and the launch of Apollo 10 on May 18. In summer of 2019, Lunar Module 9 (LM-9) was relocated to the Apollo/Saturn V Center as part of an initiative to rededicate the center and celebrate the 50th anniversary of the Apollo Program.

 

The John F. Kennedy Space Center (KSC, originally known as the NASA Launch Operations Center), located on Merritt Island, Florida, is one of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) ten field centers. Since December 1968, KSC has been NASA's primary launch center of American spaceflight, research, and technology. Launch operations for the Apollo, Skylab and Space Shuttle programs were carried out from Kennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39 and managed by KSC. Located on the east coast of Florida, KSC is adjacent to Cape Canaveral Space Force Station (CCSFS). The management of the two entities work very closely together, share resources and operate facilities on each other's property.

 

Though the first Apollo flights and all Project Mercury and Project Gemini flights took off from the then-Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, the launches were managed by KSC and its previous organization, the Launch Operations Directorate. Starting with the fourth Gemini mission, the NASA launch control center in Florida (Mercury Control Center, later the Launch Control Center) began handing off control of the vehicle to the Mission Control Center in Houston, shortly after liftoff; in prior missions it held control throughout the entire mission.

 

Additionally, the center manages launch of robotic and commercial crew missions and researches food production and in-situ resource utilization for off-Earth exploration. Since 2010, the center has worked to become a multi-user spaceport through industry partnerships, even adding a new launch pad (LC-39C) in 2015.

 

There are about 700 facilities and buildings grouped throughout the center's 144,000 acres (580 km2). Among the unique facilities at KSC are the 525-foot (160 m) tall Vehicle Assembly Building for stacking NASA's largest rockets, the Launch Control Center, which conducts space launches at KSC, the Operations and Checkout Building, which houses the astronauts dormitories and suit-up area, a Space Station factory, and a 3-mile (4.8 km) long Shuttle Landing Facility. There is also a Visitor Complex on site that is open to the public.

 

Since 1949, the military had been performing launch operations at what would become Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. In December 1959, the Department of Defense transferred 5,000 personnel and the Missile Firing Laboratory to NASA to become the Launch Operations Directorate under NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.

 

President John F. Kennedy's 1961 goal of a crewed lunar landing by 1970 required an expansion of launch operations. On July 1, 1962, the Launch Operations Directorate was separated from MSFC to become the Launch Operations Center (LOC). Also, Cape Canaveral was inadequate to host the new launch facility design required for the mammoth 363-foot (111 m) tall, 7,500,000-pound-force (33,000 kN) thrust Saturn V rocket, which would be assembled vertically in a large hangar and transported on a mobile platform to one of several launch pads. Therefore, the decision was made to build a new LOC site located adjacent to Cape Canaveral on Merritt Island.

 

NASA began land acquisition in 1962, buying title to 131 square miles (340 km2) and negotiating with the state of Florida for an additional 87 square miles (230 km2). The major buildings in KSC's Industrial Area were designed by architect Charles Luckman. Construction began in November 1962, and Kennedy visited the site twice in 1962, and again just a week before his assassination on November 22, 1963.

 

On November 29, 1963, the facility was named by President Lyndon B. Johnson under Executive Order 11129. Johnson's order joined both the civilian LOC and the military Cape Canaveral station ("the facilities of Station No. 1 of the Atlantic Missile Range") under the designation "John F. Kennedy Space Center", spawning some confusion joining the two in the public mind. NASA Administrator James E. Webb clarified this by issuing a directive stating the Kennedy Space Center name applied only to the LOC, while the Air Force issued a general order renaming the military launch site Cape Kennedy Air Force Station.

 

Located on Merritt Island, Florida, the center is north-northwest of Cape Canaveral on the Atlantic Ocean, midway between Miami and Jacksonville on Florida's Space Coast, due east of Orlando. It is 34 miles (55 km) long and roughly six miles (9.7 km) wide, covering 219 square miles (570 km2). KSC is a major central Florida tourist destination and is approximately one hour's drive from the Orlando area. The Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex offers public tours of the center and Cape Canaveral Space Force Station.

 

From 1967 through 1973, there were 13 Saturn V launches, including the ten remaining Apollo missions after Apollo 7. The first of two uncrewed flights, Apollo 4 (Apollo-Saturn 501) on November 9, 1967, was also the first rocket launch from KSC. The Saturn V's first crewed launch on December 21, 1968, was Apollo 8's lunar orbiting mission. The next two missions tested the Lunar Module: Apollo 9 (Earth orbit) and Apollo 10 (lunar orbit). Apollo 11, launched from Pad A on July 16, 1969, made the first Moon landing on July 20. The Apollo 11 launch included crewmembers Neil Armstrong, Michael Collins, and Buzz Aldrin, and attracted a record-breaking 650 million television viewers. Apollo 12 followed four months later. From 1970 to 1972, the Apollo program concluded at KSC with the launches of missions 13 through 17.

 

On May 14, 1973, the last Saturn V launch put the Skylab space station in orbit from Pad 39A. By this time, the Cape Kennedy pads 34 and 37 used for the Saturn IB were decommissioned, so Pad 39B was modified to accommodate the Saturn IB, and used to launch three crewed missions to Skylab that year, as well as the final Apollo spacecraft for the Apollo–Soyuz Test Project in 1975.

 

As the Space Shuttle was being designed, NASA received proposals for building alternative launch-and-landing sites at locations other than KSC, which demanded study. KSC had important advantages, including its existing facilities; location on the Intracoastal Waterway; and its southern latitude, which gives a velocity advantage to missions launched in easterly near-equatorial orbits. Disadvantages included: its inability to safely launch military missions into polar orbit, since spent boosters would be likely to fall on the Carolinas or Cuba; corrosion from the salt air; and frequent cloudy or stormy weather. Although building a new site at White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico was seriously considered, NASA announced its decision in April 1972 to use KSC for the shuttle. Since the Shuttle could not be landed automatically or by remote control, the launch of Columbia on April 12, 1981 for its first orbital mission STS-1, was NASA's first crewed launch of a vehicle that had not been tested in prior uncrewed launches.

 

In 1976, the VAB's south parking area was the site of Third Century America, a science and technology display commemorating the U.S. Bicentennial. Concurrent with this event, the U.S. flag was painted on the south side of the VAB. During the late 1970s, LC-39 was reconfigured to support the Space Shuttle. Two Orbiter Processing Facilities were built near the VAB as hangars with a third added in the 1980s.

 

KSC's 2.9-mile (4.7 km) Shuttle Landing Facility (SLF) was the orbiters' primary end-of-mission landing site, although the first KSC landing did not take place until the tenth flight, when Challenger completed STS-41-B on February 11, 1984; the primary landing site until then was Edwards Air Force Base in California, subsequently used as a backup landing site. The SLF also provided a return-to-launch-site (RTLS) abort option, which was not utilized. The SLF is among the longest runways in the world.

 

On October 28, 2009, the Ares I-X launch from Pad 39B was the first uncrewed launch from KSC since the Skylab workshop in 1973.

 

Beginning in 1958, NASA and military worked side by side on robotic mission launches (previously referred to as unmanned), cooperating as they broke ground in the field. In the early 1960s, NASA had as many as two robotic mission launches a month. The frequent number of flights allowed for quick evolution of the vehicles, as engineers gathered data, learned from anomalies and implemented upgrades. In 1963, with the intent of KSC ELV work focusing on the ground support equipment and facilities, a separate Atlas/Centaur organization was formed under NASA's Lewis Center (now Glenn Research Center (GRC)), taking that responsibility from the Launch Operations Center (aka KSC).

 

Though almost all robotics missions launched from the Cape Canaveral Space Force Station (CCSFS), KSC "oversaw the final assembly and testing of rockets as they arrived at the Cape." In 1965, KSC's Unmanned Launch Operations directorate became responsible for all NASA uncrewed launch operations, including those at Vandenberg Space Force Base. From the 1950s to 1978, KSC chose the rocket and payload processing facilities for all robotic missions launching in the U.S., overseeing their near launch processing and checkout. In addition to government missions, KSC performed this service for commercial and foreign missions also, though non-U.S. government entities provided reimbursement. NASA also funded Cape Canaveral Space Force Station launch pad maintenance and launch vehicle improvements.

 

All this changed with the Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984, after which NASA only coordinated its own and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) ELV launches. Companies were able to "operate their own launch vehicles" and utilize NASA's launch facilities. Payload processing handled by private firms also started to occur outside of KSC. Reagan's 1988 space policy furthered the movement of this work from KSC to commercial companies. That same year, launch complexes on Cape Canaveral Air Force Force Station started transferring from NASA to Air Force Space Command management.

 

In the 1990s, though KSC was not performing the hands-on ELV work, engineers still maintained an understanding of ELVs and had contracts allowing them insight into the vehicles so they could provide knowledgeable oversight. KSC also worked on ELV research and analysis and the contractors were able to utilize KSC personnel as a resource for technical issues. KSC, with the payload and launch vehicle industries, developed advances in automation of the ELV launch and ground operations to enable competitiveness of U.S. rockets against the global market.

 

In 1998, the Launch Services Program (LSP) formed at KSC, pulling together programs (and personnel) that already existed at KSC, GRC, Goddard Space Flight Center, and more to manage the launch of NASA and NOAA robotic missions. Cape Canaveral Space Force Station and VAFB are the primary launch sites for LSP missions, though other sites are occasionally used. LSP payloads such as the Mars Science Laboratory have been processed at KSC before being transferred to a launch pad on Cape Canaveral Space Force Station.

 

On 16 November 2022, at 06:47:44 UTC the Space Launch System (SLS) was launched from Complex 39B as part of the Artemis 1 mission.

 

As the International Space Station modules design began in the early 1990s, KSC began to work with other NASA centers and international partners to prepare for processing before launch onboard the Space Shuttles. KSC utilized its hands-on experience processing the 22 Spacelab missions in the Operations and Checkout Building to gather expectations of ISS processing. These experiences were incorporated into the design of the Space Station Processing Facility (SSPF), which began construction in 1991. The Space Station Directorate formed in 1996. KSC personnel were embedded at station module factories for insight into their processes.

 

From 1997 to 2007, KSC planned and performed on the ground integration tests and checkouts of station modules: three Multi-Element Integration Testing (MEIT) sessions and the Integration Systems Test (IST). Numerous issues were found and corrected that would have been difficult to nearly impossible to do on-orbit.

 

Today KSC continues to process ISS payloads from across the world before launch along with developing its experiments for on orbit. The proposed Lunar Gateway would be manufactured and processed at the Space Station Processing Facility.

 

The following are current programs and initiatives at Kennedy Space Center:

Commercial Crew Program

Exploration Ground Systems Program

NASA is currently designing the next heavy launch vehicle known as the Space Launch System (SLS) for continuation of human spaceflight.

On December 5, 2014, NASA launched the first uncrewed flight test of the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV), currently under development to facilitate human exploration of the Moon and Mars.

Launch Services Program

Educational Launch of Nanosatellites (ELaNa)

Research and Technology

Artemis program

Lunar Gateway

International Space Station Payloads

Camp KSC: educational camps for schoolchildren in spring and summer, with a focus on space, aviation and robotics.

 

The KSC Industrial Area, where many of the center's support facilities are located, is 5 miles (8 km) south of LC-39. It includes the Headquarters Building, the Operations and Checkout Building and the Central Instrumentation Facility. The astronaut crew quarters are in the O&C; before it was completed, the astronaut crew quarters were located in Hangar S at the Cape Canaveral Missile Test Annex (now Cape Canaveral Space Force Station). Located at KSC was the Merritt Island Spaceflight Tracking and Data Network station (MILA), a key radio communications and spacecraft tracking complex.

 

Facilities at the Kennedy Space Center are directly related to its mission to launch and recover missions. Facilities are available to prepare and maintain spacecraft and payloads for flight. The Headquarters (HQ) Building houses offices for the Center Director, library, film and photo archives, a print shop and security. When the KSC Library first opened, it was part of the Army Ballistic Missile Agency. However, in 1965, the library moved into three separate sections in the newly opened NASA headquarters before eventually becoming a single unit in 1970. The library contains over four million items related to the history and the work at Kennedy. As one of ten NASA center libraries in the country, their collection focuses on engineering, science, and technology. The archives contain planning documents, film reels, and original photographs covering the history of KSC. The library is not open to the public but is available for KSC, Space Force, and Navy employees who work on site. Many of the media items from the collection are digitized and available through NASA's KSC Media Gallery Archived December 6, 2020, at the Wayback Machine or through their more up-to-date Flickr gallery.

 

A new Headquarters Building was completed in 2019 as part of the Central Campus consolidation. Groundbreaking began in 2014.

 

The center operated its own 17-mile (27 km) short-line railroad. This operation was discontinued in 2015, with the sale of its final two locomotives. A third had already been donated to a museum. The line was costing $1.3 million annually to maintain.

 

The Neil Armstrong Operations and Checkout Building (O&C) (previously known as the Manned Spacecraft Operations Building) is a historic site on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places dating back to the 1960s and was used to receive, process, and integrate payloads for the Gemini and Apollo programs, the Skylab program in the 1970s, and for initial segments of the International Space Station through the 1990s. The Apollo and Space Shuttle astronauts would board the astronaut transfer van to launch complex 39 from the O&C building.

The three-story, 457,000-square-foot (42,500 m2) Space Station Processing Facility (SSPF) consists of two enormous processing bays, an airlock, operational control rooms, laboratories, logistics areas and office space for support of non-hazardous Space Station and Shuttle payloads to ISO 14644-1 class 5 standards. Opened in 1994, it is the largest factory building in the KSC industrial area.

The Vertical Processing Facility (VPF) features a 71-by-38-foot (22 by 12 m) door where payloads that are processed in the vertical position are brought in and manipulated with two overhead cranes and a hoist capable of lifting up to 35 short tons (32 t).

The Hypergolic Maintenance and Checkout Area (HMCA) comprises three buildings that are isolated from the rest of the industrial area because of the hazardous materials handled there. Hypergolic-fueled modules that made up the Space Shuttle Orbiter's reaction control system, orbital maneuvering system and auxiliary power units were stored and serviced in the HMCF.

The Multi-Payload Processing Facility is a 19,647 square feet (1,825.3 m2) building used for Orion spacecraft and payload processing.

The Payload Hazardous Servicing Facility (PHSF) contains a 70-by-110-foot (21 by 34 m) service bay, with a 100,000-pound (45,000 kg), 85-foot (26 m) hook height. It also contains a 58-by-80-foot (18 by 24 m) payload airlock. Its temperature is maintained at 70 °F (21 °C).[55]

The Blue Origin rocket manufacturing facility is located immediately south of the KSC visitor complex. Completed in 2019, it serves as the company's factory for the manufacture of New Glenn orbital rockets.

 

Launch Complex 39 (LC-39) was originally built for the Saturn V, the largest and most powerful operational launch vehicle until the Space Launch System, for the Apollo crewed Moon landing program. Since the end of the Apollo program in 1972, LC-39 has been used to launch every NASA human space flight, including Skylab (1973), the Apollo–Soyuz Test Project (1975), and the Space Shuttle program (1981–2011).

 

Since December 1968, all launch operations have been conducted from launch pads A and B at LC-39. Both pads are on the ocean, 3 miles (4.8 km) east of the VAB. From 1969 to 1972, LC-39 was the "Moonport" for all six Apollo crewed Moon landing missions using the Saturn V, and was used from 1981 to 2011 for all Space Shuttle launches.

 

Human missions to the Moon required the large three-stage Saturn V rocket, which was 363 feet (111 meters) tall and 33 feet (10 meters) in diameter. At KSC, Launch Complex 39 was built on Merritt Island to accommodate the new rocket. Construction of the $800 million project began in November 1962. LC-39 pads A and B were completed by October 1965 (planned Pads C, D and E were canceled), the VAB was completed in June 1965, and the infrastructure by late 1966.

 

The complex includes: the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB), a 130,000,000 cubic feet (3,700,000 m3) hangar capable of holding four Saturn Vs. The VAB was the largest structure in the world by volume when completed in 1965.

a transporter capable of carrying 5,440 tons along a crawlerway to either of two launch pads;

a 446-foot (136 m) mobile service structure, with three Mobile Launcher Platforms, each containing a fixed launch umbilical tower;

the Launch Control Center; and

a news media facility.

 

Launch Complex 48 (LC-48) is a multi-user launch site under construction for small launchers and spacecraft. It will be located between Launch Complex 39A and Space Launch Complex 41, with LC-39A to the north and SLC-41 to the south. LC-48 will be constructed as a "clean pad" to support multiple launch systems with differing propellant needs. While initially only planned to have a single pad, the complex is capable of being expanded to two at a later date.

 

As a part of promoting commercial space industry growth in the area and the overall center as a multi-user spaceport, KSC leases some of its properties. Here are some major examples:

 

Exploration Park to multiple users (partnership with Space Florida)

Shuttle Landing Facility to Space Florida (who contracts use to private companies)

Orbiter Processing Facility (OPF)-3 to Boeing (for CST-100 Starliner)

Launch Complex 39A, Launch Control Center Firing Room 4 and land for SpaceX's Roberts Road facility (Hanger X) to SpaceX

O&C High Bay to Lockheed Martin (for Orion processing)

Land for FPL's Space Coast Next Generation Solar Energy Center to Florida Power and Light (FPL)

Hypergolic Maintenance Facility (HMF) to United Paradyne Corporation (UPC)

 

The Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex, operated by Delaware North since 1995, has a variety of exhibits, artifacts, displays and attractions on the history and future of human and robotic spaceflight. Bus tours of KSC originate from here. The complex also includes the separate Apollo/Saturn V Center, north of the VAB and the United States Astronaut Hall of Fame, six miles west near Titusville. There were 1.5 million visitors in 2009. It had some 700 employees.

 

It was announced on May 29, 2015, that the Astronaut Hall of Fame exhibit would be moved from its current location to another location within the Visitor Complex to make room for an upcoming high-tech attraction entitled "Heroes and Legends". The attraction, designed by Orlando-based design firm Falcon's Treehouse, opened November 11, 2016.

 

In March 2016, the visitor center unveiled the new location of the iconic countdown clock at the complex's entrance; previously, the clock was located with a flagpole at the press site. The clock was originally built and installed in 1969 and listed with the flagpole in the National Register of Historic Places in January 2000. In 2019, NASA celebrated the 50th anniversary of the Apollo program, and the launch of Apollo 10 on May 18. In summer of 2019, Lunar Module 9 (LM-9) was relocated to the Apollo/Saturn V Center as part of an initiative to rededicate the center and celebrate the 50th anniversary of the Apollo Program.

 

Historic locations

NASA lists the following Historic Districts at KSC; each district has multiple associated facilities:

 

Launch Complex 39: Pad A Historic District

Launch Complex 39: Pad B Historic District

Shuttle Landing Facility (SLF) Area Historic District

Orbiter Processing Historic District

Solid Rocket Booster (SRB) Disassembly and Refurbishment Complex Historic District

NASA KSC Railroad System Historic District

NASA-owned Cape Canaveral Space Force Station Industrial Area Historic District

There are 24 historic properties outside of these historic districts, including the Space Shuttle Atlantis, Vehicle Assembly Building, Crawlerway, and Operations and Checkout Building.[71] KSC has one National Historic Landmark, 78 National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) listed or eligible sites, and 100 Archaeological Sites.

 

Further information: John F. Kennedy Space Center MPS

Other facilities

The Rotation, Processing and Surge Facility (RPSF) is responsible for the preparation of solid rocket booster segments for transportation to the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB). The RPSF was built in 1984 to perform SRB operations that had previously been conducted in high bays 2 and 4 of the VAB at the beginning of the Space Shuttle program. It was used until the Space Shuttle's retirement, and will be used in the future by the Space Launch System[75] (SLS) and OmegA rockets.

Governor Abercrombie signed the following bills:

 

House Bill 2052 (Relating to Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) increases access to Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) by updating references from “physicians orders for life-sustaining treatment” to “provider orders for life-sustaining treatment.” The measure also expands health care provider signatory authority to include advance practice registered nurses and corrects inconsistencies of terms describing who may sign a POLST form on behalf of a patient.

 

House Bill 1616 (Relating to Health Planning) adds to the Hawaii State Planning Act’s objectives and policies for health, the identification of social determinants of health and prioritization of programs, services, interventions, and activities that address identified social determinants of health to improve Native Hawaiian health in accordance with federal law and reduce health disparities of disproportionately affected demographics.

 

House Bill 1723 (Relating to Psychiatric Facilities) amends the notice requirements for the discharge of an involuntary patient committed pursuant to legal proceeding involving fitness to proceed and requires the family court to conduct a timely hearing prior to the termination of a standing commitment order.

 

House Bill 2320 (Relating to Health) establishes health equity as a goal for the DOH and requires the DOH to consider social determinants of health in assessing health needs in the state. The measure is known as “Loretta’s Law” for the late DOH Director Loretta Fuddy, who was passionate proponent.

 

House Bill 2581 (Relating to Insurance) establishes the State Innovation Waiver Task Force and requires the task force to submit two interim reports and a final report to the legislature.

 

Senate Bill 2469 (Relating to Telehealth) requires equivalent reimbursement for services, including behavioral health services, provided through telehealth as for the same services provided via face-to-face contact between a health care provider and a patient. The measure also clarifies that health care providers for purposes of telehealth include primary care providers, mental health providers, oral health providers, physicians and osteopathic physicians, advanced practice registered nurses, psychologists, and dentists. For consistency purposes, the bill changes statutory references of “telemedicine” to “telehealth.”

 

House Bill 2400 (Relating to Temporary Disability Benefits) provides temporary disability benefits to employees who suffer disabilities as a result of donating organs.

 

Senate Bill 1233 (Relating to Leaves of Absence) requires certain private employers to allow employees to take leaves of absence for organ, bone marrow, or peripheral blood stem cell donation. Unused sick leave, vacation, or paid time off, or unpaid time off, may be used for these leaves of absence. The measure also requires employers to restore an employee returning from leave to the same or equivalent position and establishes a private right of action for employees seeking enforcement of provisions.

Founded in 1884, the Veterans Home of California is currently the largest such facility in the United States. Some 1200 old and disabled World War II, Korean War, Vietnam War, Gulf War, War in Afghanistan, and Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom veterans reside here. The facility residences also includes nursing, health care and outpatient services.

 

The facility was established in 1882 by the Grand Army of the Republic after an earlier site in San Francisco proved not to be optimal for its function. By the time buildings had been constructed however, the group in California was bankrupt, and after struggling through several years it was sold (for $20) and turned over to the State of California in 1897. It took over a facility of 800 veterans living in 55 buildings with electricity and running water, which also contained a dairy, hog farm, and chicken ranch.

 

In 1919 WWI hero and Medal of Honor winner Nelson Holderman became commandant of the home. Despite numerous bureaucratic battles and opposition from the facility's own Civil War veterans he managed to expand the facility and build many of the buildings seen today, including the large number of trees and the hospital.

 

In the 1970s the facility was clearly declining from neglect and degrading facilities, and both the California Health and Human Services Agency and United States Department of Health and Human Services threatened to revoke funding. The California State Legislature approved $100 million to renovate the facility.

 

In 2018 the Veterans Home of California Yountville had a population of 1200 patients, and an annual operating budget of $47 million, half paid for by the State government and half by fees and Federal reimbursement. The facilities now include a golf course, baseball stadium, bowling alley, swimming pool, U.S. Post Office, and a military base exchange branch store. The Lincoln Theater is home to the Symphony Napa Valley and Orchestra Institute Napa Valley. Additional a fitness center, television station, auto hobby shop, library, creative arts center, and a multi-faith chapel are specifically available for veterans. A large residential treatment program known as the Pathway Home meant to help returning veterans of the Iraq War and Afghanistan War was also located here when I visited in early 2018. It was the subject of the 2014 documentary film, Of Men and War.

 

About 2 weeks after my visit, on March 9, 2018 Albert Wong, a veteran of the War in Afghanistan, entered the facility with a gun and took several veterans and staff members hostage. Eventually he released all but Jennifer Shushereba, a psychologist, and Jennifer Golick and Christine Loeber, the clinical and executive directors of Pathway Home respectively. All three staff were eventually found killed, as was Wong from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. The Pathway Home has been closed indefinitely.

Yountville, California

PHOTO CREDIT: Kate Holt for JHPIEGO/MCSP. Women hold their premature babies in the neo-natal ward in the Eastern Regional Hospital, in Accra, Ghana on the 11th January, 2016. The hospital records 450 deliveries per month. Challenges include lack of appropriate delivery beds, lack of cubicles to handle women at various stages of labor. Though delivery is free, clients pay for normal deliveries to cover up delays in NHIS reimbursements.

 

Governor Abercrombie signed the following bills:

 

House Bill 2052 (Relating to Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) increases access to Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) by updating references from “physicians orders for life-sustaining treatment” to “provider orders for life-sustaining treatment.” The measure also expands health care provider signatory authority to include advance practice registered nurses and corrects inconsistencies of terms describing who may sign a POLST form on behalf of a patient.

 

House Bill 1616 (Relating to Health Planning) adds to the Hawaii State Planning Act’s objectives and policies for health, the identification of social determinants of health and prioritization of programs, services, interventions, and activities that address identified social determinants of health to improve Native Hawaiian health in accordance with federal law and reduce health disparities of disproportionately affected demographics.

 

House Bill 1723 (Relating to Psychiatric Facilities) amends the notice requirements for the discharge of an involuntary patient committed pursuant to legal proceeding involving fitness to proceed and requires the family court to conduct a timely hearing prior to the termination of a standing commitment order.

 

House Bill 2320 (Relating to Health) establishes health equity as a goal for the DOH and requires the DOH to consider social determinants of health in assessing health needs in the state. The measure is known as “Loretta’s Law” for the late DOH Director Loretta Fuddy, who was passionate proponent.

 

House Bill 2581 (Relating to Insurance) establishes the State Innovation Waiver Task Force and requires the task force to submit two interim reports and a final report to the legislature.

 

Senate Bill 2469 (Relating to Telehealth) requires equivalent reimbursement for services, including behavioral health services, provided through telehealth as for the same services provided via face-to-face contact between a health care provider and a patient. The measure also clarifies that health care providers for purposes of telehealth include primary care providers, mental health providers, oral health providers, physicians and osteopathic physicians, advanced practice registered nurses, psychologists, and dentists. For consistency purposes, the bill changes statutory references of “telemedicine” to “telehealth.”

 

House Bill 2400 (Relating to Temporary Disability Benefits) provides temporary disability benefits to employees who suffer disabilities as a result of donating organs.

 

Senate Bill 1233 (Relating to Leaves of Absence) requires certain private employers to allow employees to take leaves of absence for organ, bone marrow, or peripheral blood stem cell donation. Unused sick leave, vacation, or paid time off, or unpaid time off, may be used for these leaves of absence. The measure also requires employers to restore an employee returning from leave to the same or equivalent position and establishes a private right of action for employees seeking enforcement of provisions.

Rosa DeLauro, U.S. Representative for Connecticut’s 3rd Congressional District, discusses the Wage Theft Prevention and Wage Recovery Act. H.R. 4763. 114th Congress (2015-2016), 2nd Session. United States Congress. House of Representatives. Committee on Education and the Workforce, New Haven Legal Assistance Association, Inc., 426 State Street, New Haven, Connecticut, Tuesday, April 5, 2016.

 

www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/4763/text

 

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 to prevent wage theft and assist in the recovery of stolen wages, to authorize the Secretary of Labor to administer grants to prevent wage and hour violations, and for other purposes.

 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

 

This Act may be cited as the “Wage Theft Prevention and Wage Recovery Act”.

 

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

 

Congress finds the following:

 

(1) Wage theft occurs when an employer does not pay an employee for work that the employee has performed, depriving the worker of wages and earnings to which the worker is legally entitled. This theft occurs in many forms, including by employers violating minimum wage requirements, failing to pay overtime compensation, requiring off-the-clock work, failing to provide final payments, misclassifying employees as being exempt from overtime compensation or as independent contractors rather than as employees, and improperly withholding tips.

 

(2) Wage theft poses a serious and growing problem across industries for working individuals of the United States. Wage theft is widespread and is estimated to cost workers more than $8,600,000,000 per year. In certain industries, compliance with Federal wage and hour laws is less than 50 percent.

 

(3) Wage theft is closely associated with employment discrimination, with women, immigrants, and minorities being disproportionately affected. Women are significantly more likely to experience minimum wage violations than men, foreign-born workers are nearly 2 times as likely to experience minimum wage violations as their counterparts born in the United States, and African-Americans are 3 times more likely to experience minimum wage violations than their White counterparts.

 

(4) Wage theft is closely associated with unsafe working conditions.

 

(5) Wage theft—

 

(A) depresses the wages of working families who are already struggling to make ends meet;

 

(B) strains social services funds;

 

(C) diminishes consumer spending power and hurts local economies;

 

(D) reduces vital State and Federal tax revenues;

 

(E) places law-abiding employers at a competitive disadvantage with noncompliant employers;

 

(F) burdens commerce and the free flow of goods; and

 

(G) lowers labor standards throughout labor markets.

 

(6) Low-wage workers are at the greatest risk of suffering from wage theft. A survey of 4,387 low-wage workers in New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago found that 68 percent of the workers surveyed had experienced some form of wage theft in the workweek immediately before the survey was conducted. These workers experienced a range of wage and hour violations: 26 percent of such workers were not paid minimum wage; 76 percent of such workers who worked more than 40 hours in the workweek immediately before the survey was conducted were not paid at the overtime rate; and, in the year before the survey was conducted, 43 percent of the workers who attempted to address such issues by filing a complaint with their employer or who attempted to form a labor organization experienced retaliation by their employers, including by being fired, suspended, or receiving threats of reductions in their hours or pay.

 

(7) In 2012, State and Federal authorities as well as private attorneys recovered at least $933,000,000 in wage theft enforcement actions, which was nearly 3 times the value of all bank robberies, residential robberies, convenience store and gas station robberies, and street robberies in the United States during that year.

 

(8) A Department of Labor study of wage theft in California and New York found that wage theft deprived workers of 37 percent to 49 percent of their income, pushing at least 15,000 families below the poverty line and driving another 50,000 to 100,000 families deeper into poverty.

 

(9) A study analyzing wage theft claims in the State of Washington from 2009 to 2013 estimated that the total economic cost of wage theft to the State totaled more than $64,000,000 resulting from the lower economic activity and spending of low-wage workers due to their lost wages.

 

(10) A Department of Labor study of wage violations in California and New York found that wage theft deprived families of $5,600,000 in possible earned income tax credits and resulted in a $22,000,000 loss in State tax revenue, a $238,000,000 loss in payroll tax revenue, and a $113,000,000 loss in Federal income tax revenue.

 

(11) Barriers to addressing wage theft continue to exist decades after the enactment of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.). These barriers have resulted, in significant part, because enforcement of such Act has not worked as Congress originally intended and because many of the provisions of such Act do not include sufficient penalties to discourage violations. Improvements to enforcement and amendments to such Act are necessary to ensure that such Act provides effective protection to individuals subject to wage theft.

 

(12) The lack of a Federal right for employees to receive full compensation at the agreed upon wage rate for all work performed by the employee has resulted in workers being able to recover only the applicable minimum wage, or the overtime rate if applicable, when employers engage in wage theft.

 

(13) The lack of a Federal requirement to provide employees with paystubs indicating how their pay is calculated or to allow employees to inspect their employers’ payroll records significantly impedes efforts to identify and challenge wage theft.

 

(14) The lack of a Federal requirement to pay employees their final payments in a timely manner upon termination of the employment relationship between the employer and employee has led to unreasonable, and sometimes indefinite, delays in compensation after an employment relationship ends.

 

(15) While the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Labor, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, require employers to compensate employees at the minimum wage rate and to provide overtime compensation when appropriate, the lack of civil penalties for violations of these requirements has dampened their effectiveness.

 

(16) While the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Labor, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, provide employees who are subject to wage theft with the right to unpaid minimum wages or unpaid overtime compensation plus an additional equal amount as liquidated damages, this low level of damages has proved insufficient to deter employers from stealing the wages of their employees.

 

(17) While the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Labor, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, require employers to keep records of employees’ pay, the lack of remedies for this requirement diminishes the effectiveness of the requirement.

 

(18) While the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Labor, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, provide for limited criminal penalties when employers violate the provisions of such Act, the Secretary of Labor rarely resorts to these penalties, causing them to serve as a hollow threat.

 

(19) The statute of limitations under section 6 of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 (29 U.S.C. 255), in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, precludes employees from bringing claims for wage theft 2 years after the cause of action accrued, or 3 years after the cause of action accrued if the claim is with respect to a willful or repeat violation by the employer. Additionally, the statute of limitations is not suspended while the Secretary of Labor investigates a complaint. These strict confines of the statute of limitations sometimes result in employees being deprived of their ability to institute a private lawsuit against their employer in order to recover their stolen wages.

 

(20) Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 216(b)), as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, requires employees to affirmatively “opt-in” in order to be a party plaintiff in a collective action brought by another aggrieved employee seeking to recover stolen wages in court. This provision limits the ability of employees to unite and pursue private lawsuits against employers.

 

(21) Under the penalty structure of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, many employers who are caught violating such Act continue to violate the Act. A Department of Labor investigation found that one-third of employers who had previously engaged in wage theft continued to do so.

 

(22) The Government Accountability Office and the Department of Labor have recognized that when employers are assessed civil penalties, they are more likely to comply with the law in the future and other employers in the same region—regardless of industry—are also more likely to comply with the law.

 

(23) States that have enacted legislation to address wage theft by increasing the damages to which employees are entitled following violations of wage and hour laws have positively impacted the workers in such States. However, many States have not enacted such legislation and, worse still, some States do not have any laws protecting workers from wage theft or even agencies to enforce workers’ rights to compensation for work. This discrepancy in State laws has resulted in a fragmentation of workers’ rights across the United States, with some workers having a measure of protection from wage theft and other workers being left extremely vulnerable to wage theft.

 

(24) Effective enforcement of wage and hour laws is critical to increasing compliance. Given the limited resources available for enforcement, enhanced strategic enforcement of Federal wage and hour laws is crucial.

 

(25) For enhanced strategic enforcement to be effective, government regulators must work with community stakeholders who have direct knowledge of ongoing violations of Federal wage and hour requirements and who are in a position to prevent such violations.

 

(26) Partnerships between regulators, workers, nonprofit organizations, and businesses can increase compliance by educating workers about their rights, collecting evidence, reporting violations, identifying noncompliant employers, and modeling good practices.

 

(27) Partnerships between regulators, workers, nonprofit organizations, and businesses have been successful in combating wage theft. In 2006, the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement of California created a janitorial enforcement team to work closely with a local janitorial watchdog organization. As of 2015, the partnership had resulted in countless administrative, civil, and criminal actions against employers and in the collection of more than $68,000,000 in back pay for janitorial workers.

 

(28) The Government Accountability Office has recommended that the Department of Labor identify ways to leverage its resources to better combat wage theft by improving services provided through partnerships.

 

SEC. 3. PURPOSES.

 

The purposes of this Act are to prevent wage theft and facilitate the recovery of stolen wages by—

 

(1) strengthening the penalties for engaging in wage theft;

 

(2) giving workers the right to receive, in a timely manner, full compensation for the work they perform, certain disclosures, regular paystubs, and final payments;

 

(3) providing workers with improved tools to recover their stolen wages in court; and

 

(4) making assistance available to enhance enforcement of and compliance with Federal wage and hour laws through—

 

(A) supporting initiatives that address and prevent violations of such laws and assist workers in wage recovery;

 

(B) supporting individual entities and developing community partnerships that expand and improve cooperative efforts between enforcement agencies and community-based organizations in the prevention of wage and hour violations and enforcement of wage and hour laws;

 

(C) expanding outreach to workers in industries or geographic areas identified by the Secretary of Labor as highly noncompliant with Federal wage and hour laws;

 

(D) improving detection of employers who are not complying with such laws and aiding in the identification of violations of such laws; and

 

(E) facilitating the collection of evidence to assist enforcement efforts.

 

TITLE I—AMENDMENTS TO THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT OF 1938

SEC. 101. REQUIREMENTS TO PROVIDE CERTAIN DISCLOSURES, REGULAR PAYSTUBS, AND FINAL PAYMENTS.

 

The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 is amended by inserting after section 4 (29 U.S.C. 204) the following:

 

“SEC. 5. REQUIREMENTS TO PROVIDE CERTAIN DISCLOSURES, REGULAR PAYSTUBS, AND FINAL PAYMENTS.

 

“(a) Disclosures.—

 

“(1) INITIAL DISCLOSURES.—Not later than 15 days after the date on which an employer hires an employee who in any workweek is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, or is employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, the employer of such employee shall provide such employee with an initial disclosure containing the information described in paragraph (3).

 

“(2) MODIFICATION DISCLOSURES.—Not later than 15 days after the date on which any of the information described in paragraph (3) changes with respect to an employee described in paragraph (1), the employer of such employee shall provide the employee with a modification disclosure containing the information described in paragraph (3).

 

“(3) INFORMATION.—The information described in this paragraph shall include—

 

“(A) the rate of pay and whether the employee is paid by the hour, shift, day, week, or job, or by salary, piece rate, commission, or other form of compensation;

 

“(B) an indication of whether the employee is being classified by the employer as an employee subject to the maximum hours and overtime compensation requirements of section 7 or as an employee exempt from such requirements as provided under section 13;

 

“(C) the name of the employer and any other name used by the employer to conduct business; and

 

“(D) the physical address of and telephone number for the employer’s main office or principle place of business, and a mailing address for such office or place of business if the mailing address is different than the physical address.

 

“(b) Paystubs.—

 

“(1) IN GENERAL.—Every employer shall provide each employee of such employer who in any workweek is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, or is employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, a paystub that corresponds to work performed by the employee during the applicable pay period and contains the information required under paragraph (3) in any form provided under paragraph (2).

 

“(2) FORMS.—A paystub required under this subsection shall be a written statement and may be provided in any of the following forms:

 

“(A) As a separate document accompanying any payment to an employee for work performed during the applicable pay period.

 

“(B) In the case of an employee who receives paychecks from the employer, as a detachable statement accompanying each paycheck.

 

“(C) As a digital document provided through electronic communication, subject to the employee affirmatively consenting to receive the paystubs in this form.

 

“(3) CONTENTS.—Each paystub shall contain all of the following information:

 

“(A) The name of the employee.

 

“(B) In the case of an employee who is paid an hourly wage, an employee who is employed at piece rates, or an employee who is paid a salary and is not exempt from the overtime requirements of section 7, the total number of hours worked by the employee, including the number of hours worked per workweek, during the applicable pay period.

 

“(C) The total gross and net wages paid, and, in the case of an employee who is paid an hourly wage, an employee who is employed at piece rates, or an employee who is paid a salary and is not exempt from the overtime requirements of section 7, the rate of pay for each hour worked during the applicable pay period.

 

“(D) In the case of an employee who is paid a salary in lieu of an hourly wage, the amount of salary paid during the applicable pay period.

 

“(E) In the case of an employee employed at piece rates, the number of piece rate units earned, the applicable piece rates, and the total amount paid to the employee for the applicable pay period in accordance with such piece rates.

 

“(F) The rate of pay of the employee during the applicable pay period and an explanation of the basis for such rate.

 

“(G) The number of overtime hours worked by the employee during the applicable pay period and the compensation required under section 7 that is provided to the employee for such hours.

 

“(H) Any additional compensation provided to the employee during the applicable pay period, with an explanation of each type of compensation, including any allowances or reimbursements such as amounts related to meals, clothing, lodging, or any other item, and any cost to the employee associated with such allowance or reimbursements.

 

“(I) Itemized deductions from the gross income of the employee during the applicable pay period, and an explanation for each deduction.

 

“(J) The date that is the beginning of the applicable pay period and the date that is the end of such applicable pay period.

 

“(K) The name of the employer and any other name used by the employer to conduct business.

 

“(L) The name and phone number of a representative of the employer for contact purposes.

 

“(M) Any additional information that the Secretary reasonably requires to be included through notice and comment rulemaking.

 

“(c) Final Payments.—

 

“(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 14 days after an individual described in paragraph (4) terminates employment with an employer (by action of the employer or the individual), or on the date on which such employer pays other employees for the pay period during which the individual so terminates such employment, whichever date is earlier, the employer shall provide the individual with a final payment, by compensating such individual for any uncompensated hours worked or benefits incurred by the individual as an employee for the employer.

 

“(2) CONTINUING WAGES.—An employer who violates the requirement under paragraph (1) shall, for each day, not to exceed 30 days, of such violation provide the individual described in paragraph (4) with compensation at a rate that is equal to the regular rate of compensation to which such individual was entitled when such individual was an employee of such employer.

 

“(3) LIMITATION.—Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (2), any individual described in paragraph (4) who intentionally avoids receiving a final payment described in paragraph (1), or who refuses to receive the final payment when fully tendered, resulting in the employer violating the requirement under such paragraph, shall not be entitled to the compensation provided under paragraph (2) for the time during which the individual so avoids final payment.

 

“(4) INDIVIDUAL.—An individual described in this paragraph is an individual who was employed by the employer, and through such employment, in any workweek, was engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, or was employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce.”.

 

SEC. 102. RIGHT TO FULL COMPENSATION.

 

Section 6 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206) is amended by adding at the end the following:

  

“(h) Right To Full Compensation.—

 

“(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an employment contract or other employment agreement, including a collective bargaining agreement, that specifies that an employer shall compensate an employee (who is described in paragraph (2)) at a rate that is higher than the rate provided under subsection (a), the employer shall compensate such employee at the rate specified in such contract or other employment agreement.

 

“(2) EMPLOYEE ENGAGED IN COMMERCE.—The requirement under paragraph (1) shall apply with respect to any employee who in any workweek is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, or is employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce.”.

 

SEC. 103. CIVIL AND CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT.

 

(a) Damages.—The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), as amended by section 102, is further amended—

 

(1) in section 4(f) (29 U.S.C. 204(f)), in the third sentence—

 

(A) by striking “minimum”; and

 

(B) by striking “and liquidated damages” and inserting “damages, and interest”;

 

(2) in section 6(d)(3) (29 U.S.C. 206(d)(3)) by striking “minimum”;

 

(3) in section 16 (29 U.S.C. 216)—

 

(A) in subsection (b)—

 

(i) by striking “minimum” each place it appears;

 

(ii) in the first sentence, by striking “and in an additional equal amount as liquidated damages” and inserting “, an additional amount as damages that is equal to (subject to the second sentence of this subsection) 2 times such amount of unpaid wages or unpaid overtime compensation, and the amount of any interest on such unpaid wages or unpaid overtime compensation accrued at the prevailing rate”;

 

(iii) in the second sentence, by striking “wages lost and an additional equal amount as liquidated damages” and inserting “wages lost, including any unpaid wages or any unpaid overtime compensation, an additional amount as damages that is equal to 3 times the amount of such wages lost, and the amount of any interest on such wages lost accrued at the prevailing rate”;

 

(iv) by striking the fourth sentence; and

 

(v) by adding at the end the following: “Notwithstanding chapter 1 of title 9, United States Code (commonly known as the‘Federal Arbitration Act’) or any other law, the right to bring an action, including a collective action, in court under this section cannot be waived by an employee as a condition of employment or in a pre-dispute arbitration agreement.”; and

 

(B) in subsection (c)—

 

(i) by striking “minimum” each place the term appears;

 

(ii) in the first sentence, by striking “and an additional equal amount as liquidated damages” and inserting “, an additional amount as damages that is equal to (subject to the third sentence of this subsection) 2 times such amount of unpaid wages or unpaid overtime compensation, and any interest on such unpaid wages or unpaid overtime compensation accrued at the prevailing rate”;

 

(iii) in the second sentence, by striking “and an equal amount as liquidated damages.” and inserting “, an additional amount as damages that is equal to (subject to the third sentence of this subsection) 2 times such amount of unpaid wages or unpaid overtime compensation, and any interest on such unpaid wages or unpaid overtime compensation accrued at the prevailing rate. In the event that the employer violates section 15(a)(3), the Secretary may bring an action in any court of competent jurisdiction to recover the amount of any wages lost, including any unpaid wages or any unpaid overtime compensation, an additional amount as damages that is equal to 3 times the amount of such wages lost, and any interest on such wages lost accrued at the prevailing rate.”; and

 

(iv) in the fourth sentence, by striking “or liquidated”; and

 

(4) in section 17 (29 U.S.C. 217), by striking “minimum”.

 

(b) Civil Fines.—Section 16(e) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 216(e)) is amended—

 

(1) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:

  

“(2) (A) Subject to subparagraph (B), any person who violates section 6 or 7, relating to wages, shall be subject to a civil fine that is not to exceed $2,000 per each employee affected for each initial violation of such section.

 

“(B) Any person who repeatedly or willfully violates section 6 or 7, relating to wages, shall be subject to a civil fine that is not to exceed $10,000 per each employee affected for each such violation.”; and

 

(2) by adding at the end the following:

  

“(6) Any person who violates subsection (a) or (b) of section 5 shall—

 

“(A) for the first violation of such subsection, be subject to a civil fine that is not to exceed $50 per each employee affected; and

 

“(B) for each subsequent violation of such subsection, be subject to a civil fine that is not to exceed $100 per each employee affected.

 

“(7) Any person who violates section 11(c) shall—

 

“(A) for the first violation, be subject to a civil fine that is not to exceed $1,000 per each employee affected; and

 

“(B) for each subsequent violation, be subject to a civil fine that is not to exceed $5,000 per each employee affected.”.

 

(c) Criminal Penalties.—Section 16(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 216(a)) is amended—

 

(1) by striking “Any person” and inserting “(1) Any person”;

 

(2) in the first sentence, by striking “$10,000” and inserting “$10,000 per each employee affected”;

 

(3) in the second sentence, by striking “No person” and inserting “Subject to paragraph (2), no person”; and

 

(4) by adding at the end the following:

  

“(2) (A) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, the Secretary shall refer any case involving a covered offender described in subparagraph (B) to the Department of Justice for prosecution.

 

“(B) A covered offender described in this subparagraph is an offender who willfully violates each of the following:

 

“(i) Section 11(c) by falsifying any records described in such section.

 

“(ii) Section 6 or 7, relating to wages.

 

“(iii) Section 15(a)(3).”.

 

SEC. 104. RECORDKEEPING.

 

Section 11(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 211(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following: “In the event that an employee requests an inspection of the records described in this subsection that pertain to such employee, the employer shall provide the employee with a copy of the records for a period of up to 5 years prior to such request being made. Not later than 21 days after an employee requests such an inspection, the employer shall comply with the request. In the event that an employer violates this subsection, resulting in a lack of a complete record of an employee’s hours worked or wages owed, notwithstanding whether the employer or employee is responsible for maintaining the employer’s official records, any evidence of the hours worked or wages owed set forth by the employee, including evidence of a documentary, testimonial, representative, or statistical nature, that is sufficient to establish to a finder of fact a just and reasonable inference that the employee was not fully compensated at the rate required by this Act, including under section 6(h) as applicable, for all of the work that the employee performed for the employer shall establish a rebuttable presumption that the employer violated section 6 or 7 by failing to fully compensate the employee at the required rate for all work performed by the employee for the employer and a rebuttable presumption that the evidence set forth by the employee regarding the specific number of hours worked by the employee for the employer for which the employee was not compensated and the wage rate for each of those hours is accurate. The employer may only overcome the rebuttable presumptions described in this subsection by providing clear and convincing evidence that the employee's evidence is inaccurate.”.

 

TITLE II—AMENDMENTS TO THE PORTAL-TO-PORTAL ACT OF 1947

SEC. 201. INCREASING AND TOLLING STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.

 

Section 6 of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 (29 U.S.C. 255) is amended—

 

(1) in the matter preceding subsection (a)—

 

(A) by striking “minimum”; and

 

(B) by striking “liquidated damages” and inserting “other damages”;

 

(2) in subsection (a)—

 

(A) by striking “may be commenced within two years” and inserting “may be commenced within 4 years”;

 

(B) by striking “unless commenced within two years” and inserting “unless commenced within 4 years”; and

 

(C) by striking “may be commenced within three years” and inserting “may be commenced within 5 years”;

 

(3) in subsection (d), by striking the period and inserting “; and”; and

 

(4) by adding at the end the following:

 

“(e) with respect to the running of the statutory periods of limitation for such action, the running of such statutory periods shall be deemed suspended during the period beginning on the date on which the Secretary of Labor notifies an employer of an initiation of an investigation or enforcement action and ending on the date on which the Secretary notifies the employer that the matter has been officially resolved by the Secretary.”.

 

TITLE III—WAGE THEFT PREVENTION AND WAGE RECOVERY GRANT PROGRAM

SEC. 301. DEFINITIONS.

 

In this title:

 

(1) ADMINISTRATOR.—The term the “Administrator” means the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor.

 

(2) COMMUNITY PARTNER.—The term “community partner” means any stakeholder with a commitment to enforcing wage and hour laws and preventing abuses of such laws, including any—

 

(A) State department of labor;

 

(B) attorney general of a State, or other similar authorized official of a political subdivision thereof;

 

(C) law enforcement agency;

 

(D) consulate;

 

(E) employee or advocate of employees, including a labor organization, community and faith-based organization, business association, or nonprofit legal aid organization;

 

(F) academic institution that plans, coordinates, and implements programs and activities to prevent wage and hour violations and recover unpaid wages, damages, and penalties; and

 

(G) any municipal agency responsible for the enforcement of local wage and hour laws.

 

(3) COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP.—The term “community partnership” means a partnership between—

 

(A) a working group consisting of community partners; and

 

(B) the Department of Labor.

 

(4) ELIGIBLE ENTITY.—The term “eligible entity” means an entity that is any of the following:

 

(A) A nonprofit organization, including a community-based organization, faith-based organization, or labor organization, that provides services and support to employees, including assisting such employees in recovering unpaid wages.

 

(B) An employer.

 

(C) A business association.

 

(D) An institution of higher education, as defined by section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001).

 

(E) A partnership between any of the entities described in subparagraphs (A) through (D).

 

(5) EMPLOY; EMPLOYEE; EMPLOYER.—The terms “employ”, “employee”, and “employer” have the meanings given such terms in section 3 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 203).

 

(6) SECRETARY.—The term “Secretary” means the Secretary of Labor.

 

(7) STRATEGIC ENFORCEMENT.—The term “strategic enforcement” means the process by which the Secretary—

 

(A) targets highly noncompliant industries, as identified by the Secretary, using industry-specific structures to influence, and ultimately reform, networks of interconnected employers;

 

(B) analyzes regulatory regimes under which specific industries operate; and

 

(C) modifies the enforcement approach of such regulatory regimes in order to ensure the greatest impact.

 

(8) WAGE AND HOUR LAW.—The term “wage and hour law” means any Federal law enforced by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor, including any provision of this Act enforced by such division.

 

(9) WAGE AND HOUR VIOLATION.—The term “wage and hour violation” refers to any violation of a Federal law enforced by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor, including any provision of this Act enforced by such division.

 

SEC. 302. WAGE THEFT PREVENTION AND WAGE RECOVERY GRANT PROGRAM.

 

(a) In General.—The Secretary, acting through the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor, shall provide grants to eligible entities to assist such entities in enhancing the enforcement of wage and hour laws, in accordance with this section and consistent with the purposes of this Act.

 

(b) Grants.—The grants provided under this section shall be designed to—

 

(1) support individual eligible entities in establishing and supporting the activities described in subsection (c)(1); and

 

(2) develop community partnerships to expand and improve cooperative efforts between enforcement agencies and members of the community to—

 

(A) prevent and reduce wage and hour violations; and

 

(B) assist employees in recovering back pay for any such violations.

 

(c) Use Of Funds.—

 

(1) PERMISSIBLE ACTIVITIES.—The grants described in this section shall assist eligible entities in establishing and supporting activities that include—

 

(A) disseminating information and conducting outreach and training to educate employees about their rights under wage and hour laws;

 

(B) conducting educational training for employers about their obligations under wage and hour laws;

 

(C) conducting orientations and trainings jointly with officials of the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor;

 

(D) providing assistance to employees in filing claims of wage and hour violations;

 

(E) assisting enforcement agencies in conducting investigations, including in the collection of evidence and recovering back pay;

 

(F) monitoring compliance with wage and hour laws;

 

(G) performing joint visitations to worksites that violate wage and hour laws with officials from the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor;

 

(H) establishing networks for education, communication, and participation in the workplace and community;

 

(I) evaluating the effectiveness of programs designed to prevent wage and hour violations and enforce wage and hour laws;

 

(J) recruiting and hiring of staff and volunteers;

 

(K) production and dissemination of outreach and training materials; and

 

(L) any other activities as the Secretary may reasonably prescribe through notice and comment rulemaking.

 

(2) PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES.—Notwithstanding paragraph (1), an eligible entity receiving a grant under this section may not use the grant funds for any purpose reasonably prohibited by the Secretary through notice and comment rulemaking.

 

(d) Term Of Grants.—Each grant made under this section shall be available for expenditure for a period that is not to exceed 3 years.

 

(e) Applications.—

 

(1) IN GENERAL.—An eligible entity seeking a grant under this section shall submit an application for such grant to the Secretary in accordance with this subsection.

 

(2) PARTNERSHIPS.—In the case of an eligible entity that is a partnership described in section 301(4)(E), the eligible entity may submit a joint application that designates a single entity as the lead entity for purposes of receiving and disbursing funds.

 

(3) CONTENTS.—An application under this subsection shall include—

 

(A) a description of a plan for the program that the eligible entity proposes to carry out with a grant under this section, including a long-term strategy and detailed implementation plan that reflects expected participation of, and partnership with, community groups and appropriate private and public agencies;

 

(B) information on the prevalence of wage and hour violations in each community or State of the eligible entity;

 

(C) information on any industry or geographic area targeted by the plan for such program;

 

(D) information on the type of outreach and relationship building that will be conducted under such program;

 

(E) information on the training and education that will be provided to employees and employers under such program; and

 

(F) the method by which the eligible entity will measure results of such program.

 

(f) Selection.—

 

(1) COMPETITIVE BASIS.—In accordance with this subsection, the Secretary shall, on a competitive basis, select grant recipients from among qualified eligible entities that have submitted an application under subsection (e).

 

(2) PRIORITY.—In selecting grant recipients under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall give priority to eligible entities that—

 

(A) serve employees in any industry or geographic area that is most highly at risk for noncompliance with wage and hour violations, as identified by the Secretary; and

 

(B) demonstrate past and ongoing work to prevent wage and hour violations or to recover unpaid wages.

 

(3) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS.—In selecting grant recipients under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall also consider—

 

(A) the prevalence of ongoing community support for each eligible entity, including financial and other contributions; and

 

(B) the eligible entity's past and ongoing partnerships with other organizations.

 

(g) Memoranda Of Understanding.—

 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after receiving a grant under this section, the grant recipient shall negotiate and finalize with the Administrator a memorandum of understanding that sets forth specific goals, objectives, strategies, and activities that will be carried out under the grant by such recipient through a community partnership.

 

(2) SIGNATURES.—A representative of the grant recipient (or, in the case of a grant recipient that is an eligible entity described in section 301(4)(E), a representative of each entity that composes the grant recipient) and the Administrator shall sign the memorandum of understanding under this subsection.

 

(3) REVISIONS.—The memorandum of understanding under this subsection shall be reviewed and revised by the grant recipient and the Administrator each year of the duration of the grant.

 

(h) Performance Evaluations.—

 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Each grant recipient under this section shall develop procedures for reporting, monitoring, measuring, and evaluating the activities of each program or project funded under this section.

 

(2) GUIDELINES.—The procedures required under paragraph (1) shall be in accordance with guidelines established by the Secretary.

 

(i) Revocation Or Suspension Of Funding.—If the Secretary determines that a recipient of a grant under this section is not in compliance with the terms and requirements of the memorandum of understanding under subsection (g), the Secretary may revoke or suspend (in whole or in part) the funding of the grant.

 

(j) Use Of Components.—The Secretary may use any division or agency of the Department of Labor in carrying out this Act.

 

SEC. 303. GAO STUDY.

 

(a) In General.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study to identify successful programs carried out by grants under section 302, and the elements, policies, or procedures of such programs that can be replicated by other programs carried out by grants under such section.

 

(b) Report.—Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit a report to the Secretary and Congress containing the results of the study conducted under subsection (a).

 

(c) Use Of Information.—The Secretary shall use information contained in the report submitted under subsection (b)—

 

(1) to improve the quality of community partnership programs assisted or carried out under this Act that are in existence as of the publication of the report; and

 

(2) to develop models for new community partnership programs to be assisted or carried out under this Act.

 

SEC. 304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

 

There is authorized to be appropriated $50,000,000 for fiscal year 2017 and for each subsequent fiscal year through fiscal year 2020, to remain available until expended, to carry out the grant program under section 302.

 

TITLE IV—REGULATIONS AND EFFECTIVE DATE

SEC. 401. REGULATIONS.

 

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Labor shall promulgate such regulations as are necessary to carry out this Act, and the amendments made by this Act.

 

SEC. 402. EFFECTIVE DATE.

 

The amendments made by titles I and II shall take effect on the date that is the earlier of—

 

(1) the date that is 6 months after the date on which the final regulations are promulgated by the Secretary of Labor under section 401; and

 

(2) the date that is 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act.

 

Here and now, never let it go! Jumpstart your career and social life with dry confidence. Enjoy your iPhone, iPad and touch screens with sweat-free hands. Drionic is the solution…

www.drionic.com

Do you have roadside assistance? Do you need it? Numerous people don't think too much about it but it's something that can eradicate some of the tension in your life. Most people spend at least an hour or two on the streets every day, even if they don't go far. But many never stop to think what they would do if they abruptly discovered themselves stuck on the side of the road.

 

Motor Club of America gives out a broad variety of goods and services to drivers, and people who don't have a car. Those advantages cover all over the United States, Canada & Puerto Rico. Which encompass roadside assistance, emergency room benefits, hotel discounts, travel assistance and many more.

 

Speaking specifically about MCA most popular $19.95 Total Security Motor plan it was designed to offer the highest grade of roadside services and advantages available on the market. This Total Security program presents all of the benefits you would obtain with the Security and Security Plus plans in addition very good roadside services and a number of other exceptional advantages.

 

Emergency Road Service*

Travel Assistance Reimbursement*

Travel Assistance Program*

Trip Planning and Travel Reservations*

Arrest Bond*

Bail Bonds*

Attorneys Fees*

Attorney Services*

Attorney Discounted Hourly Rates*

Discounts on Auto Related Services*

Stolen Vehicle Reward*

Credit Card Protection*

Legal Services Deeply Discounted Fixed Fee Schedule*

Discounts on Prescriptions, Vision Care, and Dental*

Emergency Reimbursement Benefits*

Daily Hospital Benefit*

Accidental Death Benefit*

 

Battery Boost

Fuel Delivery

Tire Change

Lock-Out Service

Wrecker Towing Service

And Much More

 

Emergency Road Service

Motor Club of America will pay up to $100 to provide Emergency Road Service on RVs, Motorcycles, Trailers, and vehicle's with a load capacity of 1 ton or greater.

 

Travel Assistance Reimbursement

If your vehicle is disabled in an auto misfortune, we will reimburse you up to $500 for rental vehicle or lodging, meal, and transportation expenses counting on where the accident happens.

 

Trip Planning & Travel Reservations

Motor Club of America offer a variety of travel benefits with all the roadside service membership plans including route planning and special airline, rental car, and hotel discounts.

 

Arrest Bond

Your Motor Club of America membership card can act in lieu of a cash bail for up to $500 when you are engaged in a traffic violation as allowed by state laws.

 

Bail Bonds

For all of the roadside service and motor club constituents, we can arrange up to a $25,000 bond to release you if you are ascribed with a going traffic law violation when driving a vehicle. This includes for vehicular manslaughter and auto associated negligent murder charges.

 

Attorney Fees

$2,000 in benefits for attorney fees in order to defend you from charges resulting from a covered auto. This includes:

Up to $200 for covered Moving Violations

Up to $500 for covered auto related Personal Injury matters

Up to $500 for covered Vehicle Damage issues

Up to $2,000 for covered auto related Negligent Homicide or Vehicular Manslaughter

 

Stolen Vehicle Reward

Motor Club of America will pay a $5,000 reward to law enforcement agency or individual who provides information that leads to the arrest and conviction of who's responsible for the theft of your covered vehicle in an attempt to encourage stolen vehicle recovery.

 

Discounts on Prescriptions, Vision Care, & Dental

Motor Club of America membership offers a variety of medical discounts up to a 65% discount on prescriptions, up to a 50% discount on vision, and up to a 50% discount on dental procedures.

 

Emergency Reimbursement Benefits

If you are injured in a covered accident, Motor Club of America will provide up to $500 in cash to pay for emergency room or trauma center treatment that is required for injuries caused in the accident. This includes reimbursement for the cost of:

 

Cast or Splints

Lab Work

Nursing Service

Transfusions

Anesthetics

Doctor Care

IV’s

Facility Care

 

Daily Hospital Benefits

Up to $54,500 in cash benefits to be paid at $150 per day for hospitalization that results from injuries received in a covered accident.

 

Accidental Death Benefits

Members of the Total Security program have the opportunity to enroll, free of charge, in one or all of the accidental death and dismemberment coverage packages. These include:

 

1. You, as named member, up to $50,000; or

2. You & your spouse, up to $25,000 each, plus job retraining is available for surviving spouse in many cases; or

3. You for up to $30,000, your spouse up to $15,000, children up to $3,500 each.

Other optional benefits include job retraining for surviving spouse, continuing child care plus continuing education support.

.

Travel Assistance Program

Motor Club of America offers a travel assistant program, which assists in worldwide travel for issues related to injuries or death that results from a covered accident.

 

Medical evacuation & repatriation

Non-Medical Repatriation

Return of Remains

Hospital Visits

Return of Child

Return of Companion

 

Emergency Roadside Assistance

Las Vegas, NV 89117

(702) 810-5812

mca-vegas.info

emergency-roadside-assistance.info

Twitter: twitter.com/VEGASMotorClub

Facebook: www.facebook.com/MotorClubAmericaLV

Youtube: www.youtube.com/user/MCAVegas

 

Do you have roadside assistance? Do you need it? Numerous people don't think too much about it but it's something that can eradicate some of the tension in your life. Most people spend at least an hour or two on the streets every day, even if they don't go far. But many never stop to think what they would do if they abruptly discovered themselves stuck on the side of the road.

 

Motor Club of America gives out a broad variety of goods and services to drivers, and people who don't have a car. Those advantages cover all over the United States, Canada & Puerto Rico. Which encompass roadside assistance, emergency room benefits, hotel discounts, travel assistance and many more.

 

Speaking specifically about MCA most popular $19.95 Total Security Motor plan it was designed to offer the highest grade of roadside services and advantages available on the market. This Total Security program presents all of the benefits you would obtain with the Security and Security Plus plans in addition very good roadside services and a number of other exceptional advantages.

 

Emergency Road Service*

Travel Assistance Reimbursement*

Travel Assistance Program*

Trip Planning and Travel Reservations*

Arrest Bond*

Bail Bonds*

Attorneys Fees*

Attorney Services*

Attorney Discounted Hourly Rates*

Discounts on Auto Related Services*

Stolen Vehicle Reward*

Credit Card Protection*

Legal Services Deeply Discounted Fixed Fee Schedule*

Discounts on Prescriptions, Vision Care, and Dental*

Emergency Reimbursement Benefits*

Daily Hospital Benefit*

Accidental Death Benefit*

 

Battery Boost

Fuel Delivery

Tire Change

Lock-Out Service

Wrecker Towing Service

And Much More

 

Emergency Road Service

Motor Club of America will pay up to $100 to provide Emergency Road Service on RVs, Motorcycles, Trailers, and vehicle's with a load capacity of 1 ton or greater.

 

Travel Assistance Reimbursement

If your vehicle is disabled in an auto misfortune, we will reimburse you up to $500 for rental vehicle or lodging, meal, and transportation expenses counting on where the accident happens.

 

Trip Planning & Travel Reservations

Motor Club of America offer a variety of travel benefits with all the roadside service membership plans including route planning and special airline, rental car, and hotel discounts.

 

Arrest Bond

Your Motor Club of America membership card can act in lieu of a cash bail for up to $500 when you are engaged in a traffic violation as allowed by state laws.

 

Bail Bonds

For all of the roadside service and motor club constituents, we can arrange up to a $25,000 bond to release you if you are ascribed with a going traffic law violation when driving a vehicle. This includes for vehicular manslaughter and auto associated negligent murder charges.

 

Attorney Fees

$2,000 in benefits for attorney fees in order to defend you from charges resulting from a covered auto. This includes:

Up to $200 for covered Moving Violations

Up to $500 for covered auto related Personal Injury matters

Up to $500 for covered Vehicle Damage issues

Up to $2,000 for covered auto related Negligent Homicide or Vehicular Manslaughter

 

Stolen Vehicle Reward

Motor Club of America will pay a $5,000 reward to law enforcement agency or individual who provides information that leads to the arrest and conviction of who's responsible for the theft of your covered vehicle in an attempt to encourage stolen vehicle recovery.

 

Discounts on Prescriptions, Vision Care, & Dental

Motor Club of America membership offers a variety of medical discounts up to a 65% discount on prescriptions, up to a 50% discount on vision, and up to a 50% discount on dental procedures.

 

Emergency Reimbursement Benefits

If you are injured in a covered accident, Motor Club of America will provide up to $500 in cash to pay for emergency room or trauma center treatment that is required for injuries caused in the accident. This includes reimbursement for the cost of:

 

Cast or Splints

Lab Work

Nursing Service

Transfusions

Anesthetics

Doctor Care

IV’s

Facility Care

 

Daily Hospital Benefits

Up to $54,500 in cash benefits to be paid at $150 per day for hospitalization that results from injuries received in a covered accident.

 

Accidental Death Benefits

Members of the Total Security program have the opportunity to enroll, free of charge, in one or all of the accidental death and dismemberment coverage packages. These include:

 

1. You, as named member, up to $50,000; or

2. You & your spouse, up to $25,000 each, plus job retraining is available for surviving spouse in many cases; or

3. You for up to $30,000, your spouse up to $15,000, children up to $3,500 each.

Other optional benefits include job retraining for surviving spouse, continuing child care plus continuing education support.

.

Travel Assistance Program

Motor Club of America offers a travel assistant program, which assists in worldwide travel for issues related to injuries or death that results from a covered accident.

 

Medical evacuation & repatriation

Non-Medical Repatriation

Return of Remains

Hospital Visits

Return of Child

Return of Companion

 

Emergency Roadside Assistance

Las Vegas, NV 89117

(702) 810-5812

mca-vegas.info

emergency-roadside-assistance.info

Twitter: twitter.com/VEGASMotorClub

Facebook: www.facebook.com/MotorClubAmericaLV

Youtube: www.youtube.com/user/MCAVegas

 

This is another 5 Star rating shared by one of our thousands of very satisfied clients.

 

THIS IS A SAMPLE OF HOW SOME ACCIDENT CASES ARE DECIDED BY THE NJ COURTS. OUR FIRM DID NOT PARTICIPATE AS COUNSEL IN THIS CASE. THIS IS MERELY A SAMPLE SUMMARY FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. PAST RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE FUTURE OUTCOME. THE SELECTION OF AN ATTORNEY IS IMPORTANT. GIVE THIS MATTER CAREFUL THOUGHT. SEE OUR ABOUT PAGE FOR LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT DISCLAIMER.

 

PALISADES INSURANCE COMPANY VS. HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY (L-6136-19, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

 

Plaintiff Palisades Insurance Company appeals from a February 28, 2020 order granting defendant Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey's motion for summary judgment and dismissing its complaint with prejudice. Plaintiff is an automobile insurance company that provides mandatory personal injury protection (PIP) benefits for medical expenses arising out of injuries sustained during car accidents. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3(d), plaintiff allows its customers to designate their health insurer as primary for payment of car-accident-injury-related expenses, which election results in a premium reduction. The insureds named in plaintiff's complaint each elected to have defendant act as the primary payor. Despite the designation, plaintiff received and paid the claims, before they were properly submitted to defendant. On appeal, plaintiff asserts that it has a right to be reimbursed for the medical expenses it voluntarily paid under a theory of subrogation.

 

After reviewing the provisions of the New Jersey Automobile Reparations Reform Act (No-Fault Act), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -35, the Coordination of Benefits scheme (COB), N.J.A.C. 11:3-37.1 to -37.14, and case law, the court concluded that no cause of action for subrogation exists to allow a PIP carrier to pursue reimbursement from a health insurer for claims mistakenly paid out of turn. Plaintiff's remedies are to deny the claim upon receipt, recover payments from the medical providers, request that the insureds submit their claims to defendant and pursue an appeal if coverage is denied, or obtain an assignment of rights and pursue the appeals on the insureds' behalf. In addition, when a health carrier is exempt from providing benefits, the COB regulations allow the PIP carrier to recoup the amount of the reduced premium from its insured. None of these remedies were pursued by plaintiff in this case.

 

The court also concluded that further discovery would be futile, as the sought-after information is not capable of overcoming the legal obstacle faced by defendants: the absence of a legal right of subrogation to recoup payments mistakenly made out of turn.

Excerpted from the 3/15/10 Kinship Circle alert Chile's Animals - Worse Than We Thought. Help Us Be There.

 

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Kinship Circle - info [at] kinshipcircle.org

Date: Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 3:37 PM

Subject: Worse Than We Thought - Letter From Kinship Circle

 

3/15/10: KINSHIP CIRCLE ANIMAL DISASTER AID

Chile's Animals - Worse Than We Thought. Help Us Be There.

 

Animals with broken bones. Eyes cloudy with saltwater.

A kitten cut. Puppies under rubble. There are thousands more, each one a bark and purr unheard... THIS IS CHILE, post-quake.

 

Dear Supporters,

 

I just got off the phone with Kinship Circle's Chile contact. She described the forgotten victims of Chile's 8.8-magnitude earthquake on 2/27/10 -- followed by 20+ aftershocks, some as high as 7.2 and 6.9, and two tsunamis.

 

Socorro Animal Chile, SACH (Animal Relief Chile) is a coalition of Chilean animal protection groups united for the relief of an estimated 700,000 (or more) animals scattered across Dichato, Constitucion and Pichilemu, Chile. SACH sends three veterinarian-led teams into the field daily. They've formally requested assistance from Kinship Circle's disaster response team.

 

SACH has also asked us to raise funds on their behalf, with three main goals to:

 

1. Erect a temporary tent shelter/clinic to care for animals abandoned in the earthquake.

2. Carry out a spay/neuter campaign.

3. Focus on transport and adoption campaigns, particularly in the U.S.

 

SACH needs Kinship Circle Animal Disaster Aid in Chile to assist with:

-- Search and Rescue / Trapping

-- In-Field First Aid

-- Wound Transport to Veterinary Clinics

-- In-Field Sustenance (food/water program)

-- Assessment and Tracking of Animal Populations

-- Emergency Sheltering (once a temporary staging area/clinic is established)

 

WE NEED TO RAISE $500,000.

kinshipcircle.org/donation/

 

I know you have DONATION FATIGUE! We wouldn't ask, with Haiti animal aid still underway, if it weren't critical. I ask for you to reach deep, to help with funding needs outlined below. We can't keep our promise to Chile's animals without funding, as most of our resources went to Haiti work.

 

With deep gratitude,

 

Brenda Shoss, president, Kinship Circle

 

Please donate to Kinship Circle / Animal Relief Chile now:

 

BY MAIL:

Kinship Circle

Animal Relief Chile

7380 Kingsbury Blvd.

St. Louis, MO 63130

 

ONLINE:

kinshipcircle.org/donation/

 

Your donation helps pay for:

**This is to show why we're fundraising. DO NOT SHIP ITEMS TO US.**

 

STAGING AREA/TEMP SHELTER IN CHILE:

-- Large vehicles: 3 SUVs

-- Gas fueled generators

-- Basic veterinary surgical equipment and examining table

-- Basic veterinary clinic equipment, including vaccines, medicines, etc.

-- Subcutaneous fluid bags, lines, needles

-- Portable X-ray machine and light table

-- Fans and portable air conditioners for surgical tents

-- Kennels, run, carriers, cages...for rescued animals

-- Sturdy large tent shelters for clinic, animal sheltering, volunteers

-- Electrical lighting for staging area/volunteer camp at night

-- Fencing

-- Leashes, collars

-- Bowls

-- Litter-boxes & Litter

-- Cat and dog food

-- Water

-- Blankets; Newspaper

-- Trap cages

-- Catch poles

-- Hygiene

-- Refrigerator cold storage of medication

 

VOLUNTEER DEPLOYMENT & GROUND ACTIVITIES:

-- Airfare reimbursement for volunteer deployments

-- Lodging for volunteers, whether in hotel, rented property, or camp

-- Sustenance (food, water) for volunteers + some equipment, such as catchpoles, etc.

-- Administrative costs for web construction, public messaging, long distance communications...

 

A Plea From Earthquake-Stricken Chile

 

Dear Ms. Shoss and Kinship Circle,

 

The earthquake and following tsunami that Chile suffered on the early morning of the 27th of February devastated several small towns close to the coast. Thousands of animals are silent victims of this catastrophe. Hundreds of dogs live with their owners in shelters and thousands roam the ruins of towns and cities. The dogs' guardians have lost everything and do not have the resources to feed their animals. Some opted to abandon them.

 

Chilean animal welfare groups and veterinarians decided to work together to help animals and created Socorro Animal Chile (Animal Relief Chile).

 

Socorro Animal Chile (Animal Relief Chile) formally requests assistance from Kinship Circle for our animal aid operation in Dichato, Constitucion and Pichilemu, Chile. We need trained animal disaster responders and rescue and veterinary specialists. On behalf of the animal organizations in SACH/Animal Relief Chile, we ask that Kinship Circle deploy its team to Chile to work within our animal disaster plan, in response to Chile's earthquake.

 

We also ask Kinship Circle to temporarily receive donations in the United States on behalf of Socorro Animal Chile. We urgently need funding to sustain our work for animals. Difficult bureaucratic steps necessary to opening a Paypal account ourselves, in Chile, have prompted SACH to request financial aid from other countries, especially the United States. That is the reason we ask Kinship Circle to accept funds on our behalf.

 

For all your help I am grateful,

 

Alejandra Cassino, Chief Coordinator

Adriana De La Garza, International Affairs

Socorro Animal Chile / Animal Relief Chile

 

FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT ANIMAL RELIEF CHILE

www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=329459149031&ref=ts

www.sach.bligoo.cl/

 

Kinship Circle Animal Disaster Aid is a nonprofit that mobilizes volunteers and resources for animal victims through its network of trained responders in the U.S. and Canada. www.kinshipcircle.org/disasters

 

* DONATE TO CHILE OR HAITI ANIMAL RELIEF FUNDS:

www.kinshipcircle.org/donation

 

* DONATE BY CHECK OR MONEY ORDER:

Kinship Circle / 7380 Kingsbury Blvd. / St. Louis, MO 63130

 

*********************

 

ACTION CAMPAIGNS * EDUCATION * ANIMAL DISASTER AID NETWORK

www.KinshipCircle.org * www.kinshipcircle.org/disasters

 

SIGN-UP FOR BREAKING NEWS & ACTION: subscribe [at] kinshipcircle.org

* Action campaigns on animal cruelty issues worldwide

* Animal rescue coordination/news in disasters

 

UNSUBSCRIBE

* Select a Kinship Circle ALERT received in your mailbox

* Hit "FORWARD" + Send to: info [at] kinshipcircle.org

* Type UNSUBSCRIBE in your subject line and hit send

Rosa DeLauro, U.S. Representative for Connecticut’s 3rd Congressional District, discusses the Wage Theft Prevention and Wage Recovery Act. H.R. 4763. 114th Congress (2015-2016), 2nd Session. United States Congress. House of Representatives. Committee on Education and the Workforce, New Haven Legal Assistance Association, Inc., 426 State Street, New Haven, Connecticut, Tuesday, April 5, 2016.

 

www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/4763/text

 

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 to prevent wage theft and assist in the recovery of stolen wages, to authorize the Secretary of Labor to administer grants to prevent wage and hour violations, and for other purposes.

 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

 

This Act may be cited as the “Wage Theft Prevention and Wage Recovery Act”.

 

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

 

Congress finds the following:

 

(1) Wage theft occurs when an employer does not pay an employee for work that the employee has performed, depriving the worker of wages and earnings to which the worker is legally entitled. This theft occurs in many forms, including by employers violating minimum wage requirements, failing to pay overtime compensation, requiring off-the-clock work, failing to provide final payments, misclassifying employees as being exempt from overtime compensation or as independent contractors rather than as employees, and improperly withholding tips.

 

(2) Wage theft poses a serious and growing problem across industries for working individuals of the United States. Wage theft is widespread and is estimated to cost workers more than $8,600,000,000 per year. In certain industries, compliance with Federal wage and hour laws is less than 50 percent.

 

(3) Wage theft is closely associated with employment discrimination, with women, immigrants, and minorities being disproportionately affected. Women are significantly more likely to experience minimum wage violations than men, foreign-born workers are nearly 2 times as likely to experience minimum wage violations as their counterparts born in the United States, and African-Americans are 3 times more likely to experience minimum wage violations than their White counterparts.

 

(4) Wage theft is closely associated with unsafe working conditions.

 

(5) Wage theft—

 

(A) depresses the wages of working families who are already struggling to make ends meet;

 

(B) strains social services funds;

 

(C) diminishes consumer spending power and hurts local economies;

 

(D) reduces vital State and Federal tax revenues;

 

(E) places law-abiding employers at a competitive disadvantage with noncompliant employers;

 

(F) burdens commerce and the free flow of goods; and

 

(G) lowers labor standards throughout labor markets.

 

(6) Low-wage workers are at the greatest risk of suffering from wage theft. A survey of 4,387 low-wage workers in New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago found that 68 percent of the workers surveyed had experienced some form of wage theft in the workweek immediately before the survey was conducted. These workers experienced a range of wage and hour violations: 26 percent of such workers were not paid minimum wage; 76 percent of such workers who worked more than 40 hours in the workweek immediately before the survey was conducted were not paid at the overtime rate; and, in the year before the survey was conducted, 43 percent of the workers who attempted to address such issues by filing a complaint with their employer or who attempted to form a labor organization experienced retaliation by their employers, including by being fired, suspended, or receiving threats of reductions in their hours or pay.

 

(7) In 2012, State and Federal authorities as well as private attorneys recovered at least $933,000,000 in wage theft enforcement actions, which was nearly 3 times the value of all bank robberies, residential robberies, convenience store and gas station robberies, and street robberies in the United States during that year.

 

(8) A Department of Labor study of wage theft in California and New York found that wage theft deprived workers of 37 percent to 49 percent of their income, pushing at least 15,000 families below the poverty line and driving another 50,000 to 100,000 families deeper into poverty.

 

(9) A study analyzing wage theft claims in the State of Washington from 2009 to 2013 estimated that the total economic cost of wage theft to the State totaled more than $64,000,000 resulting from the lower economic activity and spending of low-wage workers due to their lost wages.

 

(10) A Department of Labor study of wage violations in California and New York found that wage theft deprived families of $5,600,000 in possible earned income tax credits and resulted in a $22,000,000 loss in State tax revenue, a $238,000,000 loss in payroll tax revenue, and a $113,000,000 loss in Federal income tax revenue.

 

(11) Barriers to addressing wage theft continue to exist decades after the enactment of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.). These barriers have resulted, in significant part, because enforcement of such Act has not worked as Congress originally intended and because many of the provisions of such Act do not include sufficient penalties to discourage violations. Improvements to enforcement and amendments to such Act are necessary to ensure that such Act provides effective protection to individuals subject to wage theft.

 

(12) The lack of a Federal right for employees to receive full compensation at the agreed upon wage rate for all work performed by the employee has resulted in workers being able to recover only the applicable minimum wage, or the overtime rate if applicable, when employers engage in wage theft.

 

(13) The lack of a Federal requirement to provide employees with paystubs indicating how their pay is calculated or to allow employees to inspect their employers’ payroll records significantly impedes efforts to identify and challenge wage theft.

 

(14) The lack of a Federal requirement to pay employees their final payments in a timely manner upon termination of the employment relationship between the employer and employee has led to unreasonable, and sometimes indefinite, delays in compensation after an employment relationship ends.

 

(15) While the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Labor, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, require employers to compensate employees at the minimum wage rate and to provide overtime compensation when appropriate, the lack of civil penalties for violations of these requirements has dampened their effectiveness.

 

(16) While the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Labor, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, provide employees who are subject to wage theft with the right to unpaid minimum wages or unpaid overtime compensation plus an additional equal amount as liquidated damages, this low level of damages has proved insufficient to deter employers from stealing the wages of their employees.

 

(17) While the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Labor, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, require employers to keep records of employees’ pay, the lack of remedies for this requirement diminishes the effectiveness of the requirement.

 

(18) While the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Labor, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, provide for limited criminal penalties when employers violate the provisions of such Act, the Secretary of Labor rarely resorts to these penalties, causing them to serve as a hollow threat.

 

(19) The statute of limitations under section 6 of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 (29 U.S.C. 255), in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, precludes employees from bringing claims for wage theft 2 years after the cause of action accrued, or 3 years after the cause of action accrued if the claim is with respect to a willful or repeat violation by the employer. Additionally, the statute of limitations is not suspended while the Secretary of Labor investigates a complaint. These strict confines of the statute of limitations sometimes result in employees being deprived of their ability to institute a private lawsuit against their employer in order to recover their stolen wages.

 

(20) Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 216(b)), as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, requires employees to affirmatively “opt-in” in order to be a party plaintiff in a collective action brought by another aggrieved employee seeking to recover stolen wages in court. This provision limits the ability of employees to unite and pursue private lawsuits against employers.

 

(21) Under the penalty structure of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, many employers who are caught violating such Act continue to violate the Act. A Department of Labor investigation found that one-third of employers who had previously engaged in wage theft continued to do so.

 

(22) The Government Accountability Office and the Department of Labor have recognized that when employers are assessed civil penalties, they are more likely to comply with the law in the future and other employers in the same region—regardless of industry—are also more likely to comply with the law.

 

(23) States that have enacted legislation to address wage theft by increasing the damages to which employees are entitled following violations of wage and hour laws have positively impacted the workers in such States. However, many States have not enacted such legislation and, worse still, some States do not have any laws protecting workers from wage theft or even agencies to enforce workers’ rights to compensation for work. This discrepancy in State laws has resulted in a fragmentation of workers’ rights across the United States, with some workers having a measure of protection from wage theft and other workers being left extremely vulnerable to wage theft.

 

(24) Effective enforcement of wage and hour laws is critical to increasing compliance. Given the limited resources available for enforcement, enhanced strategic enforcement of Federal wage and hour laws is crucial.

 

(25) For enhanced strategic enforcement to be effective, government regulators must work with community stakeholders who have direct knowledge of ongoing violations of Federal wage and hour requirements and who are in a position to prevent such violations.

 

(26) Partnerships between regulators, workers, nonprofit organizations, and businesses can increase compliance by educating workers about their rights, collecting evidence, reporting violations, identifying noncompliant employers, and modeling good practices.

 

(27) Partnerships between regulators, workers, nonprofit organizations, and businesses have been successful in combating wage theft. In 2006, the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement of California created a janitorial enforcement team to work closely with a local janitorial watchdog organization. As of 2015, the partnership had resulted in countless administrative, civil, and criminal actions against employers and in the collection of more than $68,000,000 in back pay for janitorial workers.

 

(28) The Government Accountability Office has recommended that the Department of Labor identify ways to leverage its resources to better combat wage theft by improving services provided through partnerships.

 

SEC. 3. PURPOSES.

 

The purposes of this Act are to prevent wage theft and facilitate the recovery of stolen wages by—

 

(1) strengthening the penalties for engaging in wage theft;

 

(2) giving workers the right to receive, in a timely manner, full compensation for the work they perform, certain disclosures, regular paystubs, and final payments;

 

(3) providing workers with improved tools to recover their stolen wages in court; and

 

(4) making assistance available to enhance enforcement of and compliance with Federal wage and hour laws through—

 

(A) supporting initiatives that address and prevent violations of such laws and assist workers in wage recovery;

 

(B) supporting individual entities and developing community partnerships that expand and improve cooperative efforts between enforcement agencies and community-based organizations in the prevention of wage and hour violations and enforcement of wage and hour laws;

 

(C) expanding outreach to workers in industries or geographic areas identified by the Secretary of Labor as highly noncompliant with Federal wage and hour laws;

 

(D) improving detection of employers who are not complying with such laws and aiding in the identification of violations of such laws; and

 

(E) facilitating the collection of evidence to assist enforcement efforts.

 

TITLE I—AMENDMENTS TO THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT OF 1938

SEC. 101. REQUIREMENTS TO PROVIDE CERTAIN DISCLOSURES, REGULAR PAYSTUBS, AND FINAL PAYMENTS.

 

The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 is amended by inserting after section 4 (29 U.S.C. 204) the following:

 

“SEC. 5. REQUIREMENTS TO PROVIDE CERTAIN DISCLOSURES, REGULAR PAYSTUBS, AND FINAL PAYMENTS.

 

“(a) Disclosures.—

 

“(1) INITIAL DISCLOSURES.—Not later than 15 days after the date on which an employer hires an employee who in any workweek is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, or is employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, the employer of such employee shall provide such employee with an initial disclosure containing the information described in paragraph (3).

 

“(2) MODIFICATION DISCLOSURES.—Not later than 15 days after the date on which any of the information described in paragraph (3) changes with respect to an employee described in paragraph (1), the employer of such employee shall provide the employee with a modification disclosure containing the information described in paragraph (3).

 

“(3) INFORMATION.—The information described in this paragraph shall include—

 

“(A) the rate of pay and whether the employee is paid by the hour, shift, day, week, or job, or by salary, piece rate, commission, or other form of compensation;

 

“(B) an indication of whether the employee is being classified by the employer as an employee subject to the maximum hours and overtime compensation requirements of section 7 or as an employee exempt from such requirements as provided under section 13;

 

“(C) the name of the employer and any other name used by the employer to conduct business; and

 

“(D) the physical address of and telephone number for the employer’s main office or principle place of business, and a mailing address for such office or place of business if the mailing address is different than the physical address.

 

“(b) Paystubs.—

 

“(1) IN GENERAL.—Every employer shall provide each employee of such employer who in any workweek is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, or is employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, a paystub that corresponds to work performed by the employee during the applicable pay period and contains the information required under paragraph (3) in any form provided under paragraph (2).

 

“(2) FORMS.—A paystub required under this subsection shall be a written statement and may be provided in any of the following forms:

 

“(A) As a separate document accompanying any payment to an employee for work performed during the applicable pay period.

 

“(B) In the case of an employee who receives paychecks from the employer, as a detachable statement accompanying each paycheck.

 

“(C) As a digital document provided through electronic communication, subject to the employee affirmatively consenting to receive the paystubs in this form.

 

“(3) CONTENTS.—Each paystub shall contain all of the following information:

 

“(A) The name of the employee.

 

“(B) In the case of an employee who is paid an hourly wage, an employee who is employed at piece rates, or an employee who is paid a salary and is not exempt from the overtime requirements of section 7, the total number of hours worked by the employee, including the number of hours worked per workweek, during the applicable pay period.

 

“(C) The total gross and net wages paid, and, in the case of an employee who is paid an hourly wage, an employee who is employed at piece rates, or an employee who is paid a salary and is not exempt from the overtime requirements of section 7, the rate of pay for each hour worked during the applicable pay period.

 

“(D) In the case of an employee who is paid a salary in lieu of an hourly wage, the amount of salary paid during the applicable pay period.

 

“(E) In the case of an employee employed at piece rates, the number of piece rate units earned, the applicable piece rates, and the total amount paid to the employee for the applicable pay period in accordance with such piece rates.

 

“(F) The rate of pay of the employee during the applicable pay period and an explanation of the basis for such rate.

 

“(G) The number of overtime hours worked by the employee during the applicable pay period and the compensation required under section 7 that is provided to the employee for such hours.

 

“(H) Any additional compensation provided to the employee during the applicable pay period, with an explanation of each type of compensation, including any allowances or reimbursements such as amounts related to meals, clothing, lodging, or any other item, and any cost to the employee associated with such allowance or reimbursements.

 

“(I) Itemized deductions from the gross income of the employee during the applicable pay period, and an explanation for each deduction.

 

“(J) The date that is the beginning of the applicable pay period and the date that is the end of such applicable pay period.

 

“(K) The name of the employer and any other name used by the employer to conduct business.

 

“(L) The name and phone number of a representative of the employer for contact purposes.

 

“(M) Any additional information that the Secretary reasonably requires to be included through notice and comment rulemaking.

 

“(c) Final Payments.—

 

“(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 14 days after an individual described in paragraph (4) terminates employment with an employer (by action of the employer or the individual), or on the date on which such employer pays other employees for the pay period during which the individual so terminates such employment, whichever date is earlier, the employer shall provide the individual with a final payment, by compensating such individual for any uncompensated hours worked or benefits incurred by the individual as an employee for the employer.

 

“(2) CONTINUING WAGES.—An employer who violates the requirement under paragraph (1) shall, for each day, not to exceed 30 days, of such violation provide the individual described in paragraph (4) with compensation at a rate that is equal to the regular rate of compensation to which such individual was entitled when such individual was an employee of such employer.

 

“(3) LIMITATION.—Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (2), any individual described in paragraph (4) who intentionally avoids receiving a final payment described in paragraph (1), or who refuses to receive the final payment when fully tendered, resulting in the employer violating the requirement under such paragraph, shall not be entitled to the compensation provided under paragraph (2) for the time during which the individual so avoids final payment.

 

“(4) INDIVIDUAL.—An individual described in this paragraph is an individual who was employed by the employer, and through such employment, in any workweek, was engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, or was employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce.”.

 

SEC. 102. RIGHT TO FULL COMPENSATION.

 

Section 6 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206) is amended by adding at the end the following:

  

“(h) Right To Full Compensation.—

 

“(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an employment contract or other employment agreement, including a collective bargaining agreement, that specifies that an employer shall compensate an employee (who is described in paragraph (2)) at a rate that is higher than the rate provided under subsection (a), the employer shall compensate such employee at the rate specified in such contract or other employment agreement.

 

“(2) EMPLOYEE ENGAGED IN COMMERCE.—The requirement under paragraph (1) shall apply with respect to any employee who in any workweek is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, or is employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce.”.

 

SEC. 103. CIVIL AND CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT.

 

(a) Damages.—The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), as amended by section 102, is further amended—

 

(1) in section 4(f) (29 U.S.C. 204(f)), in the third sentence—

 

(A) by striking “minimum”; and

 

(B) by striking “and liquidated damages” and inserting “damages, and interest”;

 

(2) in section 6(d)(3) (29 U.S.C. 206(d)(3)) by striking “minimum”;

 

(3) in section 16 (29 U.S.C. 216)—

 

(A) in subsection (b)—

 

(i) by striking “minimum” each place it appears;

 

(ii) in the first sentence, by striking “and in an additional equal amount as liquidated damages” and inserting “, an additional amount as damages that is equal to (subject to the second sentence of this subsection) 2 times such amount of unpaid wages or unpaid overtime compensation, and the amount of any interest on such unpaid wages or unpaid overtime compensation accrued at the prevailing rate”;

 

(iii) in the second sentence, by striking “wages lost and an additional equal amount as liquidated damages” and inserting “wages lost, including any unpaid wages or any unpaid overtime compensation, an additional amount as damages that is equal to 3 times the amount of such wages lost, and the amount of any interest on such wages lost accrued at the prevailing rate”;

 

(iv) by striking the fourth sentence; and

 

(v) by adding at the end the following: “Notwithstanding chapter 1 of title 9, United States Code (commonly known as the‘Federal Arbitration Act’) or any other law, the right to bring an action, including a collective action, in court under this section cannot be waived by an employee as a condition of employment or in a pre-dispute arbitration agreement.”; and

 

(B) in subsection (c)—

 

(i) by striking “minimum” each place the term appears;

 

(ii) in the first sentence, by striking “and an additional equal amount as liquidated damages” and inserting “, an additional amount as damages that is equal to (subject to the third sentence of this subsection) 2 times such amount of unpaid wages or unpaid overtime compensation, and any interest on such unpaid wages or unpaid overtime compensation accrued at the prevailing rate”;

 

(iii) in the second sentence, by striking “and an equal amount as liquidated damages.” and inserting “, an additional amount as damages that is equal to (subject to the third sentence of this subsection) 2 times such amount of unpaid wages or unpaid overtime compensation, and any interest on such unpaid wages or unpaid overtime compensation accrued at the prevailing rate. In the event that the employer violates section 15(a)(3), the Secretary may bring an action in any court of competent jurisdiction to recover the amount of any wages lost, including any unpaid wages or any unpaid overtime compensation, an additional amount as damages that is equal to 3 times the amount of such wages lost, and any interest on such wages lost accrued at the prevailing rate.”; and

 

(iv) in the fourth sentence, by striking “or liquidated”; and

 

(4) in section 17 (29 U.S.C. 217), by striking “minimum”.

 

(b) Civil Fines.—Section 16(e) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 216(e)) is amended—

 

(1) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:

  

“(2) (A) Subject to subparagraph (B), any person who violates section 6 or 7, relating to wages, shall be subject to a civil fine that is not to exceed $2,000 per each employee affected for each initial violation of such section.

 

“(B) Any person who repeatedly or willfully violates section 6 or 7, relating to wages, shall be subject to a civil fine that is not to exceed $10,000 per each employee affected for each such violation.”; and

 

(2) by adding at the end the following:

  

“(6) Any person who violates subsection (a) or (b) of section 5 shall—

 

“(A) for the first violation of such subsection, be subject to a civil fine that is not to exceed $50 per each employee affected; and

 

“(B) for each subsequent violation of such subsection, be subject to a civil fine that is not to exceed $100 per each employee affected.

 

“(7) Any person who violates section 11(c) shall—

 

“(A) for the first violation, be subject to a civil fine that is not to exceed $1,000 per each employee affected; and

 

“(B) for each subsequent violation, be subject to a civil fine that is not to exceed $5,000 per each employee affected.”.

 

(c) Criminal Penalties.—Section 16(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 216(a)) is amended—

 

(1) by striking “Any person” and inserting “(1) Any person”;

 

(2) in the first sentence, by striking “$10,000” and inserting “$10,000 per each employee affected”;

 

(3) in the second sentence, by striking “No person” and inserting “Subject to paragraph (2), no person”; and

 

(4) by adding at the end the following:

  

“(2) (A) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, the Secretary shall refer any case involving a covered offender described in subparagraph (B) to the Department of Justice for prosecution.

 

“(B) A covered offender described in this subparagraph is an offender who willfully violates each of the following:

 

“(i) Section 11(c) by falsifying any records described in such section.

 

“(ii) Section 6 or 7, relating to wages.

 

“(iii) Section 15(a)(3).”.

 

SEC. 104. RECORDKEEPING.

 

Section 11(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 211(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following: “In the event that an employee requests an inspection of the records described in this subsection that pertain to such employee, the employer shall provide the employee with a copy of the records for a period of up to 5 years prior to such request being made. Not later than 21 days after an employee requests such an inspection, the employer shall comply with the request. In the event that an employer violates this subsection, resulting in a lack of a complete record of an employee’s hours worked or wages owed, notwithstanding whether the employer or employee is responsible for maintaining the employer’s official records, any evidence of the hours worked or wages owed set forth by the employee, including evidence of a documentary, testimonial, representative, or statistical nature, that is sufficient to establish to a finder of fact a just and reasonable inference that the employee was not fully compensated at the rate required by this Act, including under section 6(h) as applicable, for all of the work that the employee performed for the employer shall establish a rebuttable presumption that the employer violated section 6 or 7 by failing to fully compensate the employee at the required rate for all work performed by the employee for the employer and a rebuttable presumption that the evidence set forth by the employee regarding the specific number of hours worked by the employee for the employer for which the employee was not compensated and the wage rate for each of those hours is accurate. The employer may only overcome the rebuttable presumptions described in this subsection by providing clear and convincing evidence that the employee's evidence is inaccurate.”.

 

TITLE II—AMENDMENTS TO THE PORTAL-TO-PORTAL ACT OF 1947

SEC. 201. INCREASING AND TOLLING STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.

 

Section 6 of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 (29 U.S.C. 255) is amended—

 

(1) in the matter preceding subsection (a)—

 

(A) by striking “minimum”; and

 

(B) by striking “liquidated damages” and inserting “other damages”;

 

(2) in subsection (a)—

 

(A) by striking “may be commenced within two years” and inserting “may be commenced within 4 years”;

 

(B) by striking “unless commenced within two years” and inserting “unless commenced within 4 years”; and

 

(C) by striking “may be commenced within three years” and inserting “may be commenced within 5 years”;

 

(3) in subsection (d), by striking the period and inserting “; and”; and

 

(4) by adding at the end the following:

 

“(e) with respect to the running of the statutory periods of limitation for such action, the running of such statutory periods shall be deemed suspended during the period beginning on the date on which the Secretary of Labor notifies an employer of an initiation of an investigation or enforcement action and ending on the date on which the Secretary notifies the employer that the matter has been officially resolved by the Secretary.”.

 

TITLE III—WAGE THEFT PREVENTION AND WAGE RECOVERY GRANT PROGRAM

SEC. 301. DEFINITIONS.

 

In this title:

 

(1) ADMINISTRATOR.—The term the “Administrator” means the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor.

 

(2) COMMUNITY PARTNER.—The term “community partner” means any stakeholder with a commitment to enforcing wage and hour laws and preventing abuses of such laws, including any—

 

(A) State department of labor;

 

(B) attorney general of a State, or other similar authorized official of a political subdivision thereof;

 

(C) law enforcement agency;

 

(D) consulate;

 

(E) employee or advocate of employees, including a labor organization, community and faith-based organization, business association, or nonprofit legal aid organization;

 

(F) academic institution that plans, coordinates, and implements programs and activities to prevent wage and hour violations and recover unpaid wages, damages, and penalties; and

 

(G) any municipal agency responsible for the enforcement of local wage and hour laws.

 

(3) COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP.—The term “community partnership” means a partnership between—

 

(A) a working group consisting of community partners; and

 

(B) the Department of Labor.

 

(4) ELIGIBLE ENTITY.—The term “eligible entity” means an entity that is any of the following:

 

(A) A nonprofit organization, including a community-based organization, faith-based organization, or labor organization, that provides services and support to employees, including assisting such employees in recovering unpaid wages.

 

(B) An employer.

 

(C) A business association.

 

(D) An institution of higher education, as defined by section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001).

 

(E) A partnership between any of the entities described in subparagraphs (A) through (D).

 

(5) EMPLOY; EMPLOYEE; EMPLOYER.—The terms “employ”, “employee”, and “employer” have the meanings given such terms in section 3 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 203).

 

(6) SECRETARY.—The term “Secretary” means the Secretary of Labor.

 

(7) STRATEGIC ENFORCEMENT.—The term “strategic enforcement” means the process by which the Secretary—

 

(A) targets highly noncompliant industries, as identified by the Secretary, using industry-specific structures to influence, and ultimately reform, networks of interconnected employers;

 

(B) analyzes regulatory regimes under which specific industries operate; and

 

(C) modifies the enforcement approach of such regulatory regimes in order to ensure the greatest impact.

 

(8) WAGE AND HOUR LAW.—The term “wage and hour law” means any Federal law enforced by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor, including any provision of this Act enforced by such division.

 

(9) WAGE AND HOUR VIOLATION.—The term “wage and hour violation” refers to any violation of a Federal law enforced by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor, including any provision of this Act enforced by such division.

 

SEC. 302. WAGE THEFT PREVENTION AND WAGE RECOVERY GRANT PROGRAM.

 

(a) In General.—The Secretary, acting through the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor, shall provide grants to eligible entities to assist such entities in enhancing the enforcement of wage and hour laws, in accordance with this section and consistent with the purposes of this Act.

 

(b) Grants.—The grants provided under this section shall be designed to—

 

(1) support individual eligible entities in establishing and supporting the activities described in subsection (c)(1); and

 

(2) develop community partnerships to expand and improve cooperative efforts between enforcement agencies and members of the community to—

 

(A) prevent and reduce wage and hour violations; and

 

(B) assist employees in recovering back pay for any such violations.

 

(c) Use Of Funds.—

 

(1) PERMISSIBLE ACTIVITIES.—The grants described in this section shall assist eligible entities in establishing and supporting activities that include—

 

(A) disseminating information and conducting outreach and training to educate employees about their rights under wage and hour laws;

 

(B) conducting educational training for employers about their obligations under wage and hour laws;

 

(C) conducting orientations and trainings jointly with officials of the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor;

 

(D) providing assistance to employees in filing claims of wage and hour violations;

 

(E) assisting enforcement agencies in conducting investigations, including in the collection of evidence and recovering back pay;

 

(F) monitoring compliance with wage and hour laws;

 

(G) performing joint visitations to worksites that violate wage and hour laws with officials from the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor;

 

(H) establishing networks for education, communication, and participation in the workplace and community;

 

(I) evaluating the effectiveness of programs designed to prevent wage and hour violations and enforce wage and hour laws;

 

(J) recruiting and hiring of staff and volunteers;

 

(K) production and dissemination of outreach and training materials; and

 

(L) any other activities as the Secretary may reasonably prescribe through notice and comment rulemaking.

 

(2) PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES.—Notwithstanding paragraph (1), an eligible entity receiving a grant under this section may not use the grant funds for any purpose reasonably prohibited by the Secretary through notice and comment rulemaking.

 

(d) Term Of Grants.—Each grant made under this section shall be available for expenditure for a period that is not to exceed 3 years.

 

(e) Applications.—

 

(1) IN GENERAL.—An eligible entity seeking a grant under this section shall submit an application for such grant to the Secretary in accordance with this subsection.

 

(2) PARTNERSHIPS.—In the case of an eligible entity that is a partnership described in section 301(4)(E), the eligible entity may submit a joint application that designates a single entity as the lead entity for purposes of receiving and disbursing funds.

 

(3) CONTENTS.—An application under this subsection shall include—

 

(A) a description of a plan for the program that the eligible entity proposes to carry out with a grant under this section, including a long-term strategy and detailed implementation plan that reflects expected participation of, and partnership with, community groups and appropriate private and public agencies;

 

(B) information on the prevalence of wage and hour violations in each community or State of the eligible entity;

 

(C) information on any industry or geographic area targeted by the plan for such program;

 

(D) information on the type of outreach and relationship building that will be conducted under such program;

 

(E) information on the training and education that will be provided to employees and employers under such program; and

 

(F) the method by which the eligible entity will measure results of such program.

 

(f) Selection.—

 

(1) COMPETITIVE BASIS.—In accordance with this subsection, the Secretary shall, on a competitive basis, select grant recipients from among qualified eligible entities that have submitted an application under subsection (e).

 

(2) PRIORITY.—In selecting grant recipients under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall give priority to eligible entities that—

 

(A) serve employees in any industry or geographic area that is most highly at risk for noncompliance with wage and hour violations, as identified by the Secretary; and

 

(B) demonstrate past and ongoing work to prevent wage and hour violations or to recover unpaid wages.

 

(3) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS.—In selecting grant recipients under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall also consider—

 

(A) the prevalence of ongoing community support for each eligible entity, including financial and other contributions; and

 

(B) the eligible entity's past and ongoing partnerships with other organizations.

 

(g) Memoranda Of Understanding.—

 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after receiving a grant under this section, the grant recipient shall negotiate and finalize with the Administrator a memorandum of understanding that sets forth specific goals, objectives, strategies, and activities that will be carried out under the grant by such recipient through a community partnership.

 

(2) SIGNATURES.—A representative of the grant recipient (or, in the case of a grant recipient that is an eligible entity described in section 301(4)(E), a representative of each entity that composes the grant recipient) and the Administrator shall sign the memorandum of understanding under this subsection.

 

(3) REVISIONS.—The memorandum of understanding under this subsection shall be reviewed and revised by the grant recipient and the Administrator each year of the duration of the grant.

 

(h) Performance Evaluations.—

 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Each grant recipient under this section shall develop procedures for reporting, monitoring, measuring, and evaluating the activities of each program or project funded under this section.

 

(2) GUIDELINES.—The procedures required under paragraph (1) shall be in accordance with guidelines established by the Secretary.

 

(i) Revocation Or Suspension Of Funding.—If the Secretary determines that a recipient of a grant under this section is not in compliance with the terms and requirements of the memorandum of understanding under subsection (g), the Secretary may revoke or suspend (in whole or in part) the funding of the grant.

 

(j) Use Of Components.—The Secretary may use any division or agency of the Department of Labor in carrying out this Act.

 

SEC. 303. GAO STUDY.

 

(a) In General.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study to identify successful programs carried out by grants under section 302, and the elements, policies, or procedures of such programs that can be replicated by other programs carried out by grants under such section.

 

(b) Report.—Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit a report to the Secretary and Congress containing the results of the study conducted under subsection (a).

 

(c) Use Of Information.—The Secretary shall use information contained in the report submitted under subsection (b)—

 

(1) to improve the quality of community partnership programs assisted or carried out under this Act that are in existence as of the publication of the report; and

 

(2) to develop models for new community partnership programs to be assisted or carried out under this Act.

 

SEC. 304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

 

There is authorized to be appropriated $50,000,000 for fiscal year 2017 and for each subsequent fiscal year through fiscal year 2020, to remain available until expended, to carry out the grant program under section 302.

 

TITLE IV—REGULATIONS AND EFFECTIVE DATE

SEC. 401. REGULATIONS.

 

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Labor shall promulgate such regulations as are necessary to carry out this Act, and the amendments made by this Act.

 

SEC. 402. EFFECTIVE DATE.

 

The amendments made by titles I and II shall take effect on the date that is the earlier of—

 

(1) the date that is 6 months after the date on which the final regulations are promulgated by the Secretary of Labor under section 401; and

 

(2) the date that is 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act.

 

Governor Abercrombie signed the following bills:

 

House Bill 2052 (Relating to Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) increases access to Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) by updating references from “physicians orders for life-sustaining treatment” to “provider orders for life-sustaining treatment.” The measure also expands health care provider signatory authority to include advance practice registered nurses and corrects inconsistencies of terms describing who may sign a POLST form on behalf of a patient.

 

House Bill 1616 (Relating to Health Planning) adds to the Hawaii State Planning Act’s objectives and policies for health, the identification of social determinants of health and prioritization of programs, services, interventions, and activities that address identified social determinants of health to improve Native Hawaiian health in accordance with federal law and reduce health disparities of disproportionately affected demographics.

 

House Bill 1723 (Relating to Psychiatric Facilities) amends the notice requirements for the discharge of an involuntary patient committed pursuant to legal proceeding involving fitness to proceed and requires the family court to conduct a timely hearing prior to the termination of a standing commitment order.

 

House Bill 2320 (Relating to Health) establishes health equity as a goal for the DOH and requires the DOH to consider social determinants of health in assessing health needs in the state. The measure is known as “Loretta’s Law” for the late DOH Director Loretta Fuddy, who was passionate proponent.

 

House Bill 2581 (Relating to Insurance) establishes the State Innovation Waiver Task Force and requires the task force to submit two interim reports and a final report to the legislature.

 

Senate Bill 2469 (Relating to Telehealth) requires equivalent reimbursement for services, including behavioral health services, provided through telehealth as for the same services provided via face-to-face contact between a health care provider and a patient. The measure also clarifies that health care providers for purposes of telehealth include primary care providers, mental health providers, oral health providers, physicians and osteopathic physicians, advanced practice registered nurses, psychologists, and dentists. For consistency purposes, the bill changes statutory references of “telemedicine” to “telehealth.”

 

House Bill 2400 (Relating to Temporary Disability Benefits) provides temporary disability benefits to employees who suffer disabilities as a result of donating organs.

 

Senate Bill 1233 (Relating to Leaves of Absence) requires certain private employers to allow employees to take leaves of absence for organ, bone marrow, or peripheral blood stem cell donation. Unused sick leave, vacation, or paid time off, or unpaid time off, may be used for these leaves of absence. The measure also requires employers to restore an employee returning from leave to the same or equivalent position and establishes a private right of action for employees seeking enforcement of provisions.

Matt Moreno (left), 4th year medical student, and Scott Pester, vice president of reimbursement, prepare to install part of a wheelchair ramp.

Governor Abercrombie signed the following bills:

 

House Bill 2052 (Relating to Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) increases access to Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) by updating references from “physicians orders for life-sustaining treatment” to “provider orders for life-sustaining treatment.” The measure also expands health care provider signatory authority to include advance practice registered nurses and corrects inconsistencies of terms describing who may sign a POLST form on behalf of a patient.

 

House Bill 1616 (Relating to Health Planning) adds to the Hawaii State Planning Act’s objectives and policies for health, the identification of social determinants of health and prioritization of programs, services, interventions, and activities that address identified social determinants of health to improve Native Hawaiian health in accordance with federal law and reduce health disparities of disproportionately affected demographics.

 

House Bill 1723 (Relating to Psychiatric Facilities) amends the notice requirements for the discharge of an involuntary patient committed pursuant to legal proceeding involving fitness to proceed and requires the family court to conduct a timely hearing prior to the termination of a standing commitment order.

 

House Bill 2320 (Relating to Health) establishes health equity as a goal for the DOH and requires the DOH to consider social determinants of health in assessing health needs in the state. The measure is known as “Loretta’s Law” for the late DOH Director Loretta Fuddy, who was passionate proponent.

 

House Bill 2581 (Relating to Insurance) establishes the State Innovation Waiver Task Force and requires the task force to submit two interim reports and a final report to the legislature.

 

Senate Bill 2469 (Relating to Telehealth) requires equivalent reimbursement for services, including behavioral health services, provided through telehealth as for the same services provided via face-to-face contact between a health care provider and a patient. The measure also clarifies that health care providers for purposes of telehealth include primary care providers, mental health providers, oral health providers, physicians and osteopathic physicians, advanced practice registered nurses, psychologists, and dentists. For consistency purposes, the bill changes statutory references of “telemedicine” to “telehealth.”

 

House Bill 2400 (Relating to Temporary Disability Benefits) provides temporary disability benefits to employees who suffer disabilities as a result of donating organs.

 

Senate Bill 1233 (Relating to Leaves of Absence) requires certain private employers to allow employees to take leaves of absence for organ, bone marrow, or peripheral blood stem cell donation. Unused sick leave, vacation, or paid time off, or unpaid time off, may be used for these leaves of absence. The measure also requires employers to restore an employee returning from leave to the same or equivalent position and establishes a private right of action for employees seeking enforcement of provisions.

via

 

Lets be real, egg donation has your curiosity peaked. You might be thinking about donating, you might be thinking that women who donate eggs are amazing, but its not for you – whatever the case, you have to be curious as heck as to how eggs are retrieved and families are built? I sure am!

 

I’m the latter, I’m not an egg donator. I have always been curious though, as to how its done. I spoke to one of the pros of egg donation at ANU Fertility, her name is Marie and she has donated far more than 10 times! Here is what she shared with me about her egg donation experiences.

   

June 25, 2016 – Marie, Donator of Eggs 10+ Times!

   

Marcy – What requirements do you have to meet to donate eggs?

 

Marie – “Certain age..under 31, certain BMI (not sure of number) you need to have a clear medical history and same with family members, the ips want someone who looks like them typically is how they choose. I would say you would need to have some book smarts etc.”

   

Marcy – What medications do you take and how long do you take them for?

 

Marie – “Medications vary by person & situation. Typically the meds start on Day 2 or Day 3 of your cycle and you take them for 11 days. They are taken via injection (needle).”

   

Marcy – What appointments do you have to attend the month the donation is being done?

 

Marie – “You will be going to the clinic several times in the 11 days that you take your injections.”

   

Marcy – Are you told to avoid sex at all the month of donation?

 

Marie – “Yes sex 2 weeks before and after the start of Med’s. After retrieval as well.”

   

Marcy – How are the eggs retrieved? Is it painful? Does it leave scar tissue?

 

Marie – “The eggs are retrieved by… so you are given like a laughing gas/local anesthetic. They clean and then freeze your vagina/cervix… go in with an ultrasound wand that has a needled attached to it which is how they are removed. No scar tissue, it just feels very crampy.”

   

Marcy – Can a person still conceive after an egg donation?

 

Marie – “Of course you can conceive after.”

   

Marcy – Do you choose who your eggs go to?

 

Marie – “Not typically, its anonymous most of the time.”

   

Marcy – Do you get paid for your egg donation?

 

Marie – “No, you are not paid for egg donation. You can submit receipts related to your egg donation expenses, for reimbursement.”

   

Marcy – Do you have to live in a certain city to donate eggs?

 

Marie – “You can live wherever but you need to be able to get to the clinic several times before your even matched.”

   

Marcy – How many times a year can a person donate?

 

Marie – “There is no set number of how many times you can donate- but obviously the more times the more risk you are taking with several different things.”

   

Marcy – What tests to I have to undergo to donate? Are they invasive?

 

Marie – “Bloodwork, psych evaluation, multiple ultrasounds, pap test, STI testing. They are very invasive as you are obviously giving someone a part of you so they need to make sure you are medically sound and mentally sound.”

   

Marcy – Whats the average # of eggs retrieved? Out of the retrieved eggs, how many turn into actual viable embryos?

 

Marie – “typically around 10 are retrieved. Oh that’s hard to say everyone is so different and it depends also on the quality of sperm etc..Typically 80% Maybe a bit less.” [To add to this, some woman have many more eggs retrieved. Sometimes 30+ eggs!]

   

Marcy – Does egg donation mess up your cycle at all the following months?

 

Marie – “Nope not really“

   

Marcy – It just simply goes back to its normal cycle after the donation?

 

Marie – “It’s super easy. Only thing is your cramps are a bit more intense.”

   

Marcy – And finally, how do you feel knowing you are giving a part of you away, and you are not entitled to parental rights?

 

Marie – “*So technically i am giving away or donating a part of me so others who are less fortunate or different situations can enjoy and love such a special human being.

*I don’t look at it like they are a part of me really I more or less just think of it like this. I have an abundance amount of eggs so why not help others achieve the goal of parenthood.

* I do not feel awkward or anything as I know that the people who will be taking care of my eggs are in it all for the right reasons.

* There are also legal contracts that protect myself and family. That makes the process a lot smoother. I have a big say in how i want it to look or what i do and dont agree with and at the end of the day you have the final say.

* As far as not having rights, why would I? This is something that I have donated fully knowing that I do not have rights and I am perfectly okay with that. I think if I was to have rights then it would be a much harder process for me as then they are even more a part of me, if that makes any sense.

*I also don’t know who the other part is that makes up the child which again makes things easier.”

   

Thank you so much for your time and patience with me and all my million questions Marie!

   

**I’ve edited the post to add an example protocol for an egg donator. Each clinic will use their own amounts of medications and possibly different medications. This however, shows you just how intense egg donation can be. IT IS NOT intended to be used by anyone as a protocol. ALWAYS speak to your clinic!!**

   

START BCP: January 26, 2017

 

LAST BCP: February 13, 2017

   

If this is more than 21 days you will need to take 2 packs of active pills back to back, DO NOT TAKE ANY DAYS OFF OF THE PILLS between these dates

 

Your period may come any day after stopping the pill. It will not affect day 1 of IVF.

   

Please watch these videos prior to Stim Teaching date or Stim Day 1:

 

Gonal-F (link removed for saftey purposes)

 

Menopur (link removed for saftey purposes)

 

Puregon (Follistim) (link removed for safety purposes)

   

Stim Day 1: FEBRUARY 20, 2017

 

¨ Bloods drawn and ultrasound performed – Please book ahead for your ultrasound

 

¨ Medications will be picked up

 

¨ Start Puregon/ Gonal- F subcutaneous injections at a dose of 250 IU’s in the am

 

¨ Start Menopur subcutaneous injections at a dose of 1 vial in the am

 

¨ Doxycycline 100 mg twice daily will begin for both you and your husband/male partner (if applicable)

   

Stim Day 6: FEBRUARY 25, 2017

 

¨ 7-9 am- Bloods drawn and ultrasound performed- Please book ahead for your ultrasound

 

¨ Puregon/Gonal-F and Menopur will continue. Bring your stimulation medications to the clinic but wait to do your injections until instructed by a nurse after your clinic visit.

 

¨ Orgalutran will begin approximately Day 6

 

o To be given each morning once instructed to begin, the first injection may be in the afternoon

 

o Provided in a Pre-filled syringe, given in the same sites as all other medications

 

¨ Please plan to come for monitoring on a daily basis throughout these dates.

   

Stim Day 10: MARCH 1, 2017

 

¨ Your last Orgalutran, Puregon/Gonal-F and Menopur injections will be on this morning.

 

¨ These are the usual dates for Lupron to be given you will be informed as to when and how to take it.

   

Estimated egg retrieval date: MARCH 3, 2017

 

The post Everything You Want To Know About Egg Donation appeared first on ANU Fertility Consultants.

 

www.surrogacyincanada.com/everything-want-know-egg-donation/

This image is excerpted from a U.S. GAO report:

www.gao.gov/products/GAO-15-48

 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE: Alternative Sources of Funding Are a Key Source of Budgetary Resources and Could Be Better Managed

 

a) End-of-year balances include deposits as well as amounts that were recovered from prior-year obligations. Recoveries for all five years totaled less than $35 million.

b) Total discretionary budget authority is the sum of all new budget authority amounts provided to DOJ for the fiscal year in the annual appropriations.

c) While most credits to DOJ discretionary budget authority resulted from offsets composed of temporarily unavailable credit from the CVF, a portion of the credit to the annual discretionary budget came from the Assets Forfeiture Fund (AFF) and the Working Capital Fund (WCF). About $2.7 billion of the $33 billion in offsets came from amounts in the AFF and WCF.

d) Net discretionary budget authority is DOJ's annual budget authority provided to the department after offsetting amounts from the CVF's temporarily unavailable balances have been subtracted from DOJ's actual total discretionary authority budget.

About the Revel

 

In 2006, an investment bank - Morgan Stanley - decided a 2 billion plus investment in an Atlantic City casino was good use of its (other people's) money. It paid about $70 million for 20 acres of land in the middle of a bad neighborhood with bad streets and poor access on the northern end of the Atlantic City boardwalk.

 

It hired a casino executive, Keven DeSanctis, to over see the project. Original designs were for a $2 billion twin-tower mega-casino adjacent to the Showboat Hotel-Casino. Plans included two hotel towers with approximately 3,800 rooms; 150,000 square feet of casino space; and 500,000 square feet of dining, retail and entertainment space including a 5,500 seat theater.

 

Morgan Stanley wanted to limit its cash outlay to $1.2 billion. DeSanctis negotiated with Chinese banks for additional financing and contemplated using a Chinese Contstruction Managment Firm. DeSanctis sought New Jersey tax reimbursements of $350 million from an economic stimulus plan. The project also alienated Unite Here Local 54, the union that represents hotel and casino employees in the 11 existing Atlantic City casinos. Another major issue was Morgan Stanley's desire to figure out a way to avoid going through a cumbersome casino licensing process. Some with Morgan Stanley believed the investment bank should not be involved in running and owning a casino, anywhere!

 

Mid way through the construction of the 1,400 room resort and a cash outlay of $1.2 billion, Morgan Stanley determined that it was better to walk away from the project (taking a 98% write-down of its $1.2 billion investment in 2010) and throw its investment dollars else where. Morgan Stanley sold (gave) its investment to an investment group led buy the chairman and CEO of Revel Entertainment LLC, Kevin DeSanctis.

 

A new entity known as Revel AC, Inc. signed DeSanctis to an employment agreement in February 2011 providing DeSanctis with a $1 million base annual salary and a $1.1 million signing bonus. With help from another investment bank, J.P. Morgan Chase, DeSanctis raised $1.2 billion in debt at high interest rates early in 2011, allowing for the completion of the Revel. It is reported nine hedge funds provided $304 million of new financing for Revel in exchange for a hefty 12 percent rate of return and the power to assume up to 90 percent ownership of the casino after three years.

 

The Revel opened in April 2012. Eleven months later Revel AC, INC filed for bankruptcy.

 

At about the time Revel opened April 2, 2012, DeSanctis would determine construction cost was over budget by $100 million. The $100 million error was blamed on the general contractor. Also, Revel’s business model was at best a complete failure for the existing market.

 

For the nine months ending Dec 31, 2012 the Revel had room occupancy of 57.8% at an average daily rate of $161.64. The room occupancy percent was the lowest of 12 casino hotels in Atlantic City however the average daily rate was considerably higher then the others.

 

During April, 2013 Revel generated $8.1 million from slot machines and table games ranking it second to last of the 12 casinos. Market leader Borgata (which Revel competes against for a similar clientele) made $49 million.

 

In the filing for the pre-arranged bankruptcy, Revel sought to reduce its $1.5 billion debt to $272 million with annual interest payments reduced to $32 million. The Revel AC, Inc wants its creditors to swap about $1 billion in debt for an equity stake in Revel.

 

Jeffrey Hartmann, a 20-year casino veteran and former chief executive at Mohegan Sun Casino Resort, was appointed interim CEO, replacing Kevin DeSanctis, who was retained by the company.

 

The Revel exited from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection May 21, 2013. Chatham Asset Management, which holds a 22% stake in Revel, will now oversee the resort’s management and operation. Chatham will attempt to chart the future course for Revel.

 

For May, 2013 Revel continued to slump following its exit from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Revel posted just $11.2 million in gambling revenue, second to last among all casinos and 20 percent lower than the nearly $14 million the megresort grossed in May 2012.

 

edited by Dick Johnson

richardlloydjohnson@hotmail.com

PHOTO CREDIT: Kate Holt for JHPIEGO/MCSP. Philomena Mireku –Deputy Director of Nursing Services poses for a a photograph in the Eastern Regional Hospital, in Accra, Ghana on the 11th January, 2016. Philomena is a nurse Midwife, and trained to be a preceptor with Jhpiego in 2002.The hospital records 450 deliveries per month. Challenges include lack of appropriate delivery beds, lack of cubicles to handle women at various stages of labor. Though delivery is free, clients pay for normal deliveries to cover up delays in NHIS reimbursements.

 

Eastern Regional Hospital – Koforidua

Philomania Mireku - Deputery Director of Nursing Services

 

"I have been a trainer for Jhpiego before for many years.

We have 354 beds at the moment and do between 450 – 500 deliveries per month. We do all types of training with student midwives. We need a real delivery bed – a convertible bed that the women can be on for the first stage and then when she reaches the second stage we can move the bed for her to make sure she is comfortable. We would also like some delivery chairs because some women are more comfortable delivering in a chair. We need more training and refresher courses for our preceptors. All of our qualified midwifes in our labor ward are trained as Preceptors – We would like to see our midwives specifically in the labor ward. We have 15 midwives who work in the labor ward and for the whole hospital I have 54 midwives distributed in 5 units. Labor, pre-natal, gynecology and family planning, and ante-natal. We have around 380 women accessing family planning services every month. The numbers are increasing. I am seeing that women are having less babies. We used to have 10, 9 8 births. Now we are only getting this occasionally. These women we introduce postpartum family planning to. We always have a supply of the right drugs including ARV’s and oxytocin. We need more monitors for the labor wards and post natal wards. Our ICU until was only set up in November. There is also Korle Bu and another one. So three regional hospitals have modern ICU’s. Before we had the ICU we had a special baby care unit but it wasn’t well equipped like this new unit. We had a few incubators but if we had very critically ill patients we had to refer to Korle Bu – we would have to call an ambulance for the mothers and the relatives would have to pay for this. And now we are having cases referred to us from all over the region and the district hospitals.

There are many challenges facing women in Ghana. The first challenge is access to facilities. The road network is bad so sometimes instead of them coming to the hospital for skilled delivery they decide to stay in their villages and they have complications. And if they have complications by the time they get to us the case is bad. Sometimes too we have staff attitude which is also a problem. We need to train our staff in customer care and how to relate to patients. We need to train them in respectful maternity care. Respecting the rights of the patients and realizing that as the mother the woman has rights. We have on average three maternal deaths a months and neo-natal about 10 per month. This is because a lot of the mothers are not able to access good ante natal care. But sometimes for a midwife to detect that the mother is at risk is difficult. Even if a midwife refers a mother the mother may take her time in getting to the hospital – she may need to find the money for transport, wait for her mother in law etc. And then the mother will arrive three days after the referral. Sometimes the women just don’t understand the importance of the referral. And sometimes the midwife doesn’t have the confidence to give magnesium sulfate to women as an anti-convulsant to stop eclampsia or it is out of date and the women will go into convulsions and the baby will die. If the mother fits the mother and baby will die. But sometimes the health centers wont’ test urine protein to detect pre-eclampsia as part of the women’s care so they can’t detect it early enough. We have trained so many nurses and midwifes to provide family planning and we are training community health nurses to insert the implants but the problem is the attitude of the women themselves and their misconceptions and people cannot correct these misconceptions for them. They have to work out and decide the size of their own family – we can’t do this for them. “

   

In May 2013 the location hosting Michel Richard’s Central restaurant permanently closed after its last brunch.

 

In response to guests’ requests for a more economically priced restaurant, Revel developed Relish, a 24-hour, three-meal-a-day restaurant.

 

About the Revel

 

In 2006, an investment bank - Morgan Stanley - decided a 2 billion plus investment in an Atlantic City casino was good use of its (other people's) money. It paid about $70 million for 20 acres of land in the middle of a bad neighborhood with bad streets and poor access on the northern end of the Atlantic City boardwalk.

 

It hired a casino executive, Keven DeSanctis, to over see the project. Original designs were for a $2 billion twin-tower mega-casino adjacent to the Showboat Hotel-Casino. Plans included two hotel towers with approximately 3,800 rooms; 150,000 square feet of casino space; and 500,000 square feet of dining, retail and entertainment space including a 5,500 seat theater.

 

Morgan Stanley wanted to limit its cash outlay to $1.2 billion. DeSanctis negotiated with Chinese banks for additional financing and contemplated using a Chinese Contstruction Managment Firm. DeSanctis sought New Jersey tax reimbursements of $350 million from an economic stimulus plan. The project also alienated Unite Here Local 54, the union that represents hotel and casino employees in the 11 existing Atlantic City casinos. Another major issue was Morgan Stanley's desire to figure out a way to avoid going through a cumbersome casino licensing process. Some with Morgan Stanley believed the investment bank should not be involved in running and owning a casino, anywhere!

 

Mid way through the construction of the 1,400 room resort and a cash outlay of $1.2 billion, Morgan Stanley determined that it was better to walk away from the project (taking a 98% write-down of its $1.2 billion investment in 2010) and throw its investment dollars else where. Morgan Stanley sold (gave) its investment to an investment group led buy the chairman and CEO of Revel Entertainment LLC, Kevin DeSanctis.

 

A new entity known as Revel AC, Inc. signed DeSanctis to an employment agreement in February 2011 providing DeSanctis with a $1 million base annual salary and a $1.1 million signing bonus. With help from another investment bank, J.P. Morgan Chase, DeSanctis raised $1.2 billion in debt at high interest rates early in 2011, allowing for the completion of the Revel. It is reported nine hedge funds provided $304 million of new financing for Revel in exchange for a hefty 12 percent rate of return and the power to assume up to 90 percent ownership of the casino after three years.

 

The Revel opened in April 2012. Eleven months later Revel AC, INC filed for bankruptcy.

 

At about the time Revel opened April 2, 2012, DeSanctis would determine construction cost was over budget by $100 million. The $100 million error was blamed on the general contractor. Also, Revel’s business model was at best a complete failure for the existing market.

 

For the nine months ending Dec 31, 2012 the Revel had room occupancy of 57.8% at an average daily rate of $161.64. The room occupancy percent was the lowest of 12 casino hotels in Atlantic City however the average daily rate was considerably higher then the others.

 

During April, 2013 Revel generated $8.1 million from slot machines and table games ranking it second to last of the 12 casinos. Market leader Borgata (which Revel competes against for a similar clientele) made $49 million.

 

In the filing for the pre-arranged bankruptcy, Revel sought to reduce its $1.5 billion debt to $272 million with annual interest payments reduced to $32 million. The Revel AC, Inc wants its creditors to swap about $1 billion in debt for an equity stake in Revel.

 

Jeffrey Hartmann, a 20-year casino veteran and former chief executive at Mohegan Sun Casino Resort, was appointed interim CEO, replacing Kevin DeSanctis, who was retained by the company.

 

The Revel exited from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection May 21, 2013. Chatham Asset Management, which holds a 22% stake in Revel, will now oversee the resort’s management and operation. Chatham will attempt to chart the future course for Revel.

 

For May, 2013 Revel continued to slump following its exit from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Revel posted just $11.2 million in gambling revenue, second to last among all casinos and 20 percent lower than the nearly $14 million the megresort grossed in May 2012.

 

edited by Dick Johnson

richardlloydjohnson@hotmail.com

U.S. Senator Claire McCaskill, the top-ranking Democrat on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, today released the first product of her wide-ranging investigation into opioid manufacturers and distributors. “Fueling an Epidemic: Insys Therapeutics and the Systemic Manipulation of Prior Authorization” describes the emphasis Insys Therapeutics put on boosting approvals for its highly addictive fentanyl drug Subsys, even for inappropriate, off-label uses, and details an audio recording in which an Insys sales representative misidentifies herself and uses language designed to circumvent the prior authorization process.

 

Insurers often employ this process to prevent the overprescription and abuse of powerful and expensive drugs like Subsys. While the Food and Drug Administration has only approved Subsys for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain—cancer pain that persists despite attempted treatment with other opioid medications—an internal document obtained by McCaskill shows that Insys lacked measures to prevent its representatives from manipulating the prior authorization process and gaining approval for Subsys treatment of non-cancer conditions like back pain, fibromyalgia and migraine headaches.

 

“There is extensive evidence that Insys aggressively pressured its employees and the entire medical system to increase the use of a fentanyl product during a national epidemic that was taking the lives of tens of thousands of Americans a year in order to make more money—it’s hard to imagine anything more despicable,” McCaskill said. “Their attempts to manipulate the prescription approval process for this drug appear to have been systemic, and anyone responsible for this manipulation deserves to be prosecuted.”

 

As part of its investigation, the minority staff received an audio recording of conversations between an Insys employee and pharmacy benefit manager representatives related to a Subsys prescription for Sarah Fuller, who later died from an alleged fentanyl overdose. This recording suggests the Insys employee in question repeatedly misled Envision Pharmaceutical Services to obtain approval for Ms. Fuller’s Subsys treatment—heavily implying she was employed by the prescribing physician and misrepresenting the type of pain the patient was experiencing.

 

The call occurred during a period in which Insys was aggressively pressuring its employees to increase their ratio of approvals. Employees reportedly received significant financial incentives and management pressure—including quotas and group and individual bonuses—to boost the rate of Subsys authorizations. “In an internal presentation dated 2012 and entitled, “2013 SUBSYS Brand Plan,” Insys identified one of six “key strategic imperatives” as “Mitigate Prior Authorization barriers,” the report notes. “On a later slide, the company identified several tasks associated with this effort, including “Build internal [prior authorization] assistance infrastructure,” “Establish an internal 1-800 reimbursement assistance hotline,” and “Educate field force on [prior authorization] process and facilitation.”

 

Subsys—a fentanyl sublingual spray product approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2012 to treat breakthrough cancer pain—can cost over $20,000 per month, and proved incredibly successful financially after its introduction to the market. Insys had “the best-performing initial public offering in 2013,” and, over the next two years, revenues tripled and profits rose 45%. The value of company stock increased 296% between 2013 and 2016.

 

McCaskill has previously requested information related to sales and marketing materials, internal addiction studies, details on compliance with government settlements and donations to third party advocacy groups from major opioid manufacturers. She recently expanded her investigation, requesting documents and information from opioid manufacturers Mallinckrodt, Endo, Teva, and Allergan, while a request to McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, and Cardinal Health, Inc., focused on their distribution of opioid products.

 

When McCaskill was ranking member of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, she joined Subcommittee Chairman Rob Portman to launch an investigation into the role Medicare Part D entities, private insurers, and pharmacy benefit managers play in detecting, reporting, and addressing opioid abuse, resulting in the in-depth report, “Combatting the Opioid Epidemic: A Review of Anti-Abuse Efforts in Medicare and Private Health Insurance Systems.”

 

Visit www.mccaskill.senate.gov/opioid-investigation to learn more about McCaskill’s investigation.

Rosa DeLauro, U.S. Representative for Connecticut’s 3rd Congressional District, discusses the Wage Theft Prevention and Wage Recovery Act. H.R. 4763. 114th Congress (2015-2016), 2nd Session. United States Congress. House of Representatives. Committee on Education and the Workforce, New Haven Legal Assistance Association, Inc., 426 State Street, New Haven, Connecticut, Tuesday, April 5, 2016.

 

www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/4763/text

 

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 to prevent wage theft and assist in the recovery of stolen wages, to authorize the Secretary of Labor to administer grants to prevent wage and hour violations, and for other purposes.

 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

 

This Act may be cited as the “Wage Theft Prevention and Wage Recovery Act”.

 

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

 

Congress finds the following:

 

(1) Wage theft occurs when an employer does not pay an employee for work that the employee has performed, depriving the worker of wages and earnings to which the worker is legally entitled. This theft occurs in many forms, including by employers violating minimum wage requirements, failing to pay overtime compensation, requiring off-the-clock work, failing to provide final payments, misclassifying employees as being exempt from overtime compensation or as independent contractors rather than as employees, and improperly withholding tips.

 

(2) Wage theft poses a serious and growing problem across industries for working individuals of the United States. Wage theft is widespread and is estimated to cost workers more than $8,600,000,000 per year. In certain industries, compliance with Federal wage and hour laws is less than 50 percent.

 

(3) Wage theft is closely associated with employment discrimination, with women, immigrants, and minorities being disproportionately affected. Women are significantly more likely to experience minimum wage violations than men, foreign-born workers are nearly 2 times as likely to experience minimum wage violations as their counterparts born in the United States, and African-Americans are 3 times more likely to experience minimum wage violations than their White counterparts.

 

(4) Wage theft is closely associated with unsafe working conditions.

 

(5) Wage theft—

 

(A) depresses the wages of working families who are already struggling to make ends meet;

 

(B) strains social services funds;

 

(C) diminishes consumer spending power and hurts local economies;

 

(D) reduces vital State and Federal tax revenues;

 

(E) places law-abiding employers at a competitive disadvantage with noncompliant employers;

 

(F) burdens commerce and the free flow of goods; and

 

(G) lowers labor standards throughout labor markets.

 

(6) Low-wage workers are at the greatest risk of suffering from wage theft. A survey of 4,387 low-wage workers in New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago found that 68 percent of the workers surveyed had experienced some form of wage theft in the workweek immediately before the survey was conducted. These workers experienced a range of wage and hour violations: 26 percent of such workers were not paid minimum wage; 76 percent of such workers who worked more than 40 hours in the workweek immediately before the survey was conducted were not paid at the overtime rate; and, in the year before the survey was conducted, 43 percent of the workers who attempted to address such issues by filing a complaint with their employer or who attempted to form a labor organization experienced retaliation by their employers, including by being fired, suspended, or receiving threats of reductions in their hours or pay.

 

(7) In 2012, State and Federal authorities as well as private attorneys recovered at least $933,000,000 in wage theft enforcement actions, which was nearly 3 times the value of all bank robberies, residential robberies, convenience store and gas station robberies, and street robberies in the United States during that year.

 

(8) A Department of Labor study of wage theft in California and New York found that wage theft deprived workers of 37 percent to 49 percent of their income, pushing at least 15,000 families below the poverty line and driving another 50,000 to 100,000 families deeper into poverty.

 

(9) A study analyzing wage theft claims in the State of Washington from 2009 to 2013 estimated that the total economic cost of wage theft to the State totaled more than $64,000,000 resulting from the lower economic activity and spending of low-wage workers due to their lost wages.

 

(10) A Department of Labor study of wage violations in California and New York found that wage theft deprived families of $5,600,000 in possible earned income tax credits and resulted in a $22,000,000 loss in State tax revenue, a $238,000,000 loss in payroll tax revenue, and a $113,000,000 loss in Federal income tax revenue.

 

(11) Barriers to addressing wage theft continue to exist decades after the enactment of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.). These barriers have resulted, in significant part, because enforcement of such Act has not worked as Congress originally intended and because many of the provisions of such Act do not include sufficient penalties to discourage violations. Improvements to enforcement and amendments to such Act are necessary to ensure that such Act provides effective protection to individuals subject to wage theft.

 

(12) The lack of a Federal right for employees to receive full compensation at the agreed upon wage rate for all work performed by the employee has resulted in workers being able to recover only the applicable minimum wage, or the overtime rate if applicable, when employers engage in wage theft.

 

(13) The lack of a Federal requirement to provide employees with paystubs indicating how their pay is calculated or to allow employees to inspect their employers’ payroll records significantly impedes efforts to identify and challenge wage theft.

 

(14) The lack of a Federal requirement to pay employees their final payments in a timely manner upon termination of the employment relationship between the employer and employee has led to unreasonable, and sometimes indefinite, delays in compensation after an employment relationship ends.

 

(15) While the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Labor, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, require employers to compensate employees at the minimum wage rate and to provide overtime compensation when appropriate, the lack of civil penalties for violations of these requirements has dampened their effectiveness.

 

(16) While the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Labor, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, provide employees who are subject to wage theft with the right to unpaid minimum wages or unpaid overtime compensation plus an additional equal amount as liquidated damages, this low level of damages has proved insufficient to deter employers from stealing the wages of their employees.

 

(17) While the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Labor, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, require employers to keep records of employees’ pay, the lack of remedies for this requirement diminishes the effectiveness of the requirement.

 

(18) While the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Labor, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, provide for limited criminal penalties when employers violate the provisions of such Act, the Secretary of Labor rarely resorts to these penalties, causing them to serve as a hollow threat.

 

(19) The statute of limitations under section 6 of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 (29 U.S.C. 255), in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, precludes employees from bringing claims for wage theft 2 years after the cause of action accrued, or 3 years after the cause of action accrued if the claim is with respect to a willful or repeat violation by the employer. Additionally, the statute of limitations is not suspended while the Secretary of Labor investigates a complaint. These strict confines of the statute of limitations sometimes result in employees being deprived of their ability to institute a private lawsuit against their employer in order to recover their stolen wages.

 

(20) Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 216(b)), as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, requires employees to affirmatively “opt-in” in order to be a party plaintiff in a collective action brought by another aggrieved employee seeking to recover stolen wages in court. This provision limits the ability of employees to unite and pursue private lawsuits against employers.

 

(21) Under the penalty structure of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, many employers who are caught violating such Act continue to violate the Act. A Department of Labor investigation found that one-third of employers who had previously engaged in wage theft continued to do so.

 

(22) The Government Accountability Office and the Department of Labor have recognized that when employers are assessed civil penalties, they are more likely to comply with the law in the future and other employers in the same region—regardless of industry—are also more likely to comply with the law.

 

(23) States that have enacted legislation to address wage theft by increasing the damages to which employees are entitled following violations of wage and hour laws have positively impacted the workers in such States. However, many States have not enacted such legislation and, worse still, some States do not have any laws protecting workers from wage theft or even agencies to enforce workers’ rights to compensation for work. This discrepancy in State laws has resulted in a fragmentation of workers’ rights across the United States, with some workers having a measure of protection from wage theft and other workers being left extremely vulnerable to wage theft.

 

(24) Effective enforcement of wage and hour laws is critical to increasing compliance. Given the limited resources available for enforcement, enhanced strategic enforcement of Federal wage and hour laws is crucial.

 

(25) For enhanced strategic enforcement to be effective, government regulators must work with community stakeholders who have direct knowledge of ongoing violations of Federal wage and hour requirements and who are in a position to prevent such violations.

 

(26) Partnerships between regulators, workers, nonprofit organizations, and businesses can increase compliance by educating workers about their rights, collecting evidence, reporting violations, identifying noncompliant employers, and modeling good practices.

 

(27) Partnerships between regulators, workers, nonprofit organizations, and businesses have been successful in combating wage theft. In 2006, the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement of California created a janitorial enforcement team to work closely with a local janitorial watchdog organization. As of 2015, the partnership had resulted in countless administrative, civil, and criminal actions against employers and in the collection of more than $68,000,000 in back pay for janitorial workers.

 

(28) The Government Accountability Office has recommended that the Department of Labor identify ways to leverage its resources to better combat wage theft by improving services provided through partnerships.

 

SEC. 3. PURPOSES.

 

The purposes of this Act are to prevent wage theft and facilitate the recovery of stolen wages by—

 

(1) strengthening the penalties for engaging in wage theft;

 

(2) giving workers the right to receive, in a timely manner, full compensation for the work they perform, certain disclosures, regular paystubs, and final payments;

 

(3) providing workers with improved tools to recover their stolen wages in court; and

 

(4) making assistance available to enhance enforcement of and compliance with Federal wage and hour laws through—

 

(A) supporting initiatives that address and prevent violations of such laws and assist workers in wage recovery;

 

(B) supporting individual entities and developing community partnerships that expand and improve cooperative efforts between enforcement agencies and community-based organizations in the prevention of wage and hour violations and enforcement of wage and hour laws;

 

(C) expanding outreach to workers in industries or geographic areas identified by the Secretary of Labor as highly noncompliant with Federal wage and hour laws;

 

(D) improving detection of employers who are not complying with such laws and aiding in the identification of violations of such laws; and

 

(E) facilitating the collection of evidence to assist enforcement efforts.

 

TITLE I—AMENDMENTS TO THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT OF 1938

SEC. 101. REQUIREMENTS TO PROVIDE CERTAIN DISCLOSURES, REGULAR PAYSTUBS, AND FINAL PAYMENTS.

 

The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 is amended by inserting after section 4 (29 U.S.C. 204) the following:

 

“SEC. 5. REQUIREMENTS TO PROVIDE CERTAIN DISCLOSURES, REGULAR PAYSTUBS, AND FINAL PAYMENTS.

 

“(a) Disclosures.—

 

“(1) INITIAL DISCLOSURES.—Not later than 15 days after the date on which an employer hires an employee who in any workweek is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, or is employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, the employer of such employee shall provide such employee with an initial disclosure containing the information described in paragraph (3).

 

“(2) MODIFICATION DISCLOSURES.—Not later than 15 days after the date on which any of the information described in paragraph (3) changes with respect to an employee described in paragraph (1), the employer of such employee shall provide the employee with a modification disclosure containing the information described in paragraph (3).

 

“(3) INFORMATION.—The information described in this paragraph shall include—

 

“(A) the rate of pay and whether the employee is paid by the hour, shift, day, week, or job, or by salary, piece rate, commission, or other form of compensation;

 

“(B) an indication of whether the employee is being classified by the employer as an employee subject to the maximum hours and overtime compensation requirements of section 7 or as an employee exempt from such requirements as provided under section 13;

 

“(C) the name of the employer and any other name used by the employer to conduct business; and

 

“(D) the physical address of and telephone number for the employer’s main office or principle place of business, and a mailing address for such office or place of business if the mailing address is different than the physical address.

 

“(b) Paystubs.—

 

“(1) IN GENERAL.—Every employer shall provide each employee of such employer who in any workweek is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, or is employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, a paystub that corresponds to work performed by the employee during the applicable pay period and contains the information required under paragraph (3) in any form provided under paragraph (2).

 

“(2) FORMS.—A paystub required under this subsection shall be a written statement and may be provided in any of the following forms:

 

“(A) As a separate document accompanying any payment to an employee for work performed during the applicable pay period.

 

“(B) In the case of an employee who receives paychecks from the employer, as a detachable statement accompanying each paycheck.

 

“(C) As a digital document provided through electronic communication, subject to the employee affirmatively consenting to receive the paystubs in this form.

 

“(3) CONTENTS.—Each paystub shall contain all of the following information:

 

“(A) The name of the employee.

 

“(B) In the case of an employee who is paid an hourly wage, an employee who is employed at piece rates, or an employee who is paid a salary and is not exempt from the overtime requirements of section 7, the total number of hours worked by the employee, including the number of hours worked per workweek, during the applicable pay period.

 

“(C) The total gross and net wages paid, and, in the case of an employee who is paid an hourly wage, an employee who is employed at piece rates, or an employee who is paid a salary and is not exempt from the overtime requirements of section 7, the rate of pay for each hour worked during the applicable pay period.

 

“(D) In the case of an employee who is paid a salary in lieu of an hourly wage, the amount of salary paid during the applicable pay period.

 

“(E) In the case of an employee employed at piece rates, the number of piece rate units earned, the applicable piece rates, and the total amount paid to the employee for the applicable pay period in accordance with such piece rates.

 

“(F) The rate of pay of the employee during the applicable pay period and an explanation of the basis for such rate.

 

“(G) The number of overtime hours worked by the employee during the applicable pay period and the compensation required under section 7 that is provided to the employee for such hours.

 

“(H) Any additional compensation provided to the employee during the applicable pay period, with an explanation of each type of compensation, including any allowances or reimbursements such as amounts related to meals, clothing, lodging, or any other item, and any cost to the employee associated with such allowance or reimbursements.

 

“(I) Itemized deductions from the gross income of the employee during the applicable pay period, and an explanation for each deduction.

 

“(J) The date that is the beginning of the applicable pay period and the date that is the end of such applicable pay period.

 

“(K) The name of the employer and any other name used by the employer to conduct business.

 

“(L) The name and phone number of a representative of the employer for contact purposes.

 

“(M) Any additional information that the Secretary reasonably requires to be included through notice and comment rulemaking.

 

“(c) Final Payments.—

 

“(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 14 days after an individual described in paragraph (4) terminates employment with an employer (by action of the employer or the individual), or on the date on which such employer pays other employees for the pay period during which the individual so terminates such employment, whichever date is earlier, the employer shall provide the individual with a final payment, by compensating such individual for any uncompensated hours worked or benefits incurred by the individual as an employee for the employer.

 

“(2) CONTINUING WAGES.—An employer who violates the requirement under paragraph (1) shall, for each day, not to exceed 30 days, of such violation provide the individual described in paragraph (4) with compensation at a rate that is equal to the regular rate of compensation to which such individual was entitled when such individual was an employee of such employer.

 

“(3) LIMITATION.—Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (2), any individual described in paragraph (4) who intentionally avoids receiving a final payment described in paragraph (1), or who refuses to receive the final payment when fully tendered, resulting in the employer violating the requirement under such paragraph, shall not be entitled to the compensation provided under paragraph (2) for the time during which the individual so avoids final payment.

 

“(4) INDIVIDUAL.—An individual described in this paragraph is an individual who was employed by the employer, and through such employment, in any workweek, was engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, or was employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce.”.

 

SEC. 102. RIGHT TO FULL COMPENSATION.

 

Section 6 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206) is amended by adding at the end the following:

  

“(h) Right To Full Compensation.—

 

“(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an employment contract or other employment agreement, including a collective bargaining agreement, that specifies that an employer shall compensate an employee (who is described in paragraph (2)) at a rate that is higher than the rate provided under subsection (a), the employer shall compensate such employee at the rate specified in such contract or other employment agreement.

 

“(2) EMPLOYEE ENGAGED IN COMMERCE.—The requirement under paragraph (1) shall apply with respect to any employee who in any workweek is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, or is employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce.”.

 

SEC. 103. CIVIL AND CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT.

 

(a) Damages.—The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), as amended by section 102, is further amended—

 

(1) in section 4(f) (29 U.S.C. 204(f)), in the third sentence—

 

(A) by striking “minimum”; and

 

(B) by striking “and liquidated damages” and inserting “damages, and interest”;

 

(2) in section 6(d)(3) (29 U.S.C. 206(d)(3)) by striking “minimum”;

 

(3) in section 16 (29 U.S.C. 216)—

 

(A) in subsection (b)—

 

(i) by striking “minimum” each place it appears;

 

(ii) in the first sentence, by striking “and in an additional equal amount as liquidated damages” and inserting “, an additional amount as damages that is equal to (subject to the second sentence of this subsection) 2 times such amount of unpaid wages or unpaid overtime compensation, and the amount of any interest on such unpaid wages or unpaid overtime compensation accrued at the prevailing rate”;

 

(iii) in the second sentence, by striking “wages lost and an additional equal amount as liquidated damages” and inserting “wages lost, including any unpaid wages or any unpaid overtime compensation, an additional amount as damages that is equal to 3 times the amount of such wages lost, and the amount of any interest on such wages lost accrued at the prevailing rate”;

 

(iv) by striking the fourth sentence; and

 

(v) by adding at the end the following: “Notwithstanding chapter 1 of title 9, United States Code (commonly known as the‘Federal Arbitration Act’) or any other law, the right to bring an action, including a collective action, in court under this section cannot be waived by an employee as a condition of employment or in a pre-dispute arbitration agreement.”; and

 

(B) in subsection (c)—

 

(i) by striking “minimum” each place the term appears;

 

(ii) in the first sentence, by striking “and an additional equal amount as liquidated damages” and inserting “, an additional amount as damages that is equal to (subject to the third sentence of this subsection) 2 times such amount of unpaid wages or unpaid overtime compensation, and any interest on such unpaid wages or unpaid overtime compensation accrued at the prevailing rate”;

 

(iii) in the second sentence, by striking “and an equal amount as liquidated damages.” and inserting “, an additional amount as damages that is equal to (subject to the third sentence of this subsection) 2 times such amount of unpaid wages or unpaid overtime compensation, and any interest on such unpaid wages or unpaid overtime compensation accrued at the prevailing rate. In the event that the employer violates section 15(a)(3), the Secretary may bring an action in any court of competent jurisdiction to recover the amount of any wages lost, including any unpaid wages or any unpaid overtime compensation, an additional amount as damages that is equal to 3 times the amount of such wages lost, and any interest on such wages lost accrued at the prevailing rate.”; and

 

(iv) in the fourth sentence, by striking “or liquidated”; and

 

(4) in section 17 (29 U.S.C. 217), by striking “minimum”.

 

(b) Civil Fines.—Section 16(e) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 216(e)) is amended—

 

(1) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:

  

“(2) (A) Subject to subparagraph (B), any person who violates section 6 or 7, relating to wages, shall be subject to a civil fine that is not to exceed $2,000 per each employee affected for each initial violation of such section.

 

“(B) Any person who repeatedly or willfully violates section 6 or 7, relating to wages, shall be subject to a civil fine that is not to exceed $10,000 per each employee affected for each such violation.”; and

 

(2) by adding at the end the following:

  

“(6) Any person who violates subsection (a) or (b) of section 5 shall—

 

“(A) for the first violation of such subsection, be subject to a civil fine that is not to exceed $50 per each employee affected; and

 

“(B) for each subsequent violation of such subsection, be subject to a civil fine that is not to exceed $100 per each employee affected.

 

“(7) Any person who violates section 11(c) shall—

 

“(A) for the first violation, be subject to a civil fine that is not to exceed $1,000 per each employee affected; and

 

“(B) for each subsequent violation, be subject to a civil fine that is not to exceed $5,000 per each employee affected.”.

 

(c) Criminal Penalties.—Section 16(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 216(a)) is amended—

 

(1) by striking “Any person” and inserting “(1) Any person”;

 

(2) in the first sentence, by striking “$10,000” and inserting “$10,000 per each employee affected”;

 

(3) in the second sentence, by striking “No person” and inserting “Subject to paragraph (2), no person”; and

 

(4) by adding at the end the following:

  

“(2) (A) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, the Secretary shall refer any case involving a covered offender described in subparagraph (B) to the Department of Justice for prosecution.

 

“(B) A covered offender described in this subparagraph is an offender who willfully violates each of the following:

 

“(i) Section 11(c) by falsifying any records described in such section.

 

“(ii) Section 6 or 7, relating to wages.

 

“(iii) Section 15(a)(3).”.

 

SEC. 104. RECORDKEEPING.

 

Section 11(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 211(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following: “In the event that an employee requests an inspection of the records described in this subsection that pertain to such employee, the employer shall provide the employee with a copy of the records for a period of up to 5 years prior to such request being made. Not later than 21 days after an employee requests such an inspection, the employer shall comply with the request. In the event that an employer violates this subsection, resulting in a lack of a complete record of an employee’s hours worked or wages owed, notwithstanding whether the employer or employee is responsible for maintaining the employer’s official records, any evidence of the hours worked or wages owed set forth by the employee, including evidence of a documentary, testimonial, representative, or statistical nature, that is sufficient to establish to a finder of fact a just and reasonable inference that the employee was not fully compensated at the rate required by this Act, including under section 6(h) as applicable, for all of the work that the employee performed for the employer shall establish a rebuttable presumption that the employer violated section 6 or 7 by failing to fully compensate the employee at the required rate for all work performed by the employee for the employer and a rebuttable presumption that the evidence set forth by the employee regarding the specific number of hours worked by the employee for the employer for which the employee was not compensated and the wage rate for each of those hours is accurate. The employer may only overcome the rebuttable presumptions described in this subsection by providing clear and convincing evidence that the employee's evidence is inaccurate.”.

 

TITLE II—AMENDMENTS TO THE PORTAL-TO-PORTAL ACT OF 1947

SEC. 201. INCREASING AND TOLLING STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.

 

Section 6 of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 (29 U.S.C. 255) is amended—

 

(1) in the matter preceding subsection (a)—

 

(A) by striking “minimum”; and

 

(B) by striking “liquidated damages” and inserting “other damages”;

 

(2) in subsection (a)—

 

(A) by striking “may be commenced within two years” and inserting “may be commenced within 4 years”;

 

(B) by striking “unless commenced within two years” and inserting “unless commenced within 4 years”; and

 

(C) by striking “may be commenced within three years” and inserting “may be commenced within 5 years”;

 

(3) in subsection (d), by striking the period and inserting “; and”; and

 

(4) by adding at the end the following:

 

“(e) with respect to the running of the statutory periods of limitation for such action, the running of such statutory periods shall be deemed suspended during the period beginning on the date on which the Secretary of Labor notifies an employer of an initiation of an investigation or enforcement action and ending on the date on which the Secretary notifies the employer that the matter has been officially resolved by the Secretary.”.

 

TITLE III—WAGE THEFT PREVENTION AND WAGE RECOVERY GRANT PROGRAM

SEC. 301. DEFINITIONS.

 

In this title:

 

(1) ADMINISTRATOR.—The term the “Administrator” means the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor.

 

(2) COMMUNITY PARTNER.—The term “community partner” means any stakeholder with a commitment to enforcing wage and hour laws and preventing abuses of such laws, including any—

 

(A) State department of labor;

 

(B) attorney general of a State, or other similar authorized official of a political subdivision thereof;

 

(C) law enforcement agency;

 

(D) consulate;

 

(E) employee or advocate of employees, including a labor organization, community and faith-based organization, business association, or nonprofit legal aid organization;

 

(F) academic institution that plans, coordinates, and implements programs and activities to prevent wage and hour violations and recover unpaid wages, damages, and penalties; and

 

(G) any municipal agency responsible for the enforcement of local wage and hour laws.

 

(3) COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP.—The term “community partnership” means a partnership between—

 

(A) a working group consisting of community partners; and

 

(B) the Department of Labor.

 

(4) ELIGIBLE ENTITY.—The term “eligible entity” means an entity that is any of the following:

 

(A) A nonprofit organization, including a community-based organization, faith-based organization, or labor organization, that provides services and support to employees, including assisting such employees in recovering unpaid wages.

 

(B) An employer.

 

(C) A business association.

 

(D) An institution of higher education, as defined by section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001).

 

(E) A partnership between any of the entities described in subparagraphs (A) through (D).

 

(5) EMPLOY; EMPLOYEE; EMPLOYER.—The terms “employ”, “employee”, and “employer” have the meanings given such terms in section 3 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 203).

 

(6) SECRETARY.—The term “Secretary” means the Secretary of Labor.

 

(7) STRATEGIC ENFORCEMENT.—The term “strategic enforcement” means the process by which the Secretary—

 

(A) targets highly noncompliant industries, as identified by the Secretary, using industry-specific structures to influence, and ultimately reform, networks of interconnected employers;

 

(B) analyzes regulatory regimes under which specific industries operate; and

 

(C) modifies the enforcement approach of such regulatory regimes in order to ensure the greatest impact.

 

(8) WAGE AND HOUR LAW.—The term “wage and hour law” means any Federal law enforced by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor, including any provision of this Act enforced by such division.

 

(9) WAGE AND HOUR VIOLATION.—The term “wage and hour violation” refers to any violation of a Federal law enforced by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor, including any provision of this Act enforced by such division.

 

SEC. 302. WAGE THEFT PREVENTION AND WAGE RECOVERY GRANT PROGRAM.

 

(a) In General.—The Secretary, acting through the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor, shall provide grants to eligible entities to assist such entities in enhancing the enforcement of wage and hour laws, in accordance with this section and consistent with the purposes of this Act.

 

(b) Grants.—The grants provided under this section shall be designed to—

 

(1) support individual eligible entities in establishing and supporting the activities described in subsection (c)(1); and

 

(2) develop community partnerships to expand and improve cooperative efforts between enforcement agencies and members of the community to—

 

(A) prevent and reduce wage and hour violations; and

 

(B) assist employees in recovering back pay for any such violations.

 

(c) Use Of Funds.—

 

(1) PERMISSIBLE ACTIVITIES.—The grants described in this section shall assist eligible entities in establishing and supporting activities that include—

 

(A) disseminating information and conducting outreach and training to educate employees about their rights under wage and hour laws;

 

(B) conducting educational training for employers about their obligations under wage and hour laws;

 

(C) conducting orientations and trainings jointly with officials of the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor;

 

(D) providing assistance to employees in filing claims of wage and hour violations;

 

(E) assisting enforcement agencies in conducting investigations, including in the collection of evidence and recovering back pay;

 

(F) monitoring compliance with wage and hour laws;

 

(G) performing joint visitations to worksites that violate wage and hour laws with officials from the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor;

 

(H) establishing networks for education, communication, and participation in the workplace and community;

 

(I) evaluating the effectiveness of programs designed to prevent wage and hour violations and enforce wage and hour laws;

 

(J) recruiting and hiring of staff and volunteers;

 

(K) production and dissemination of outreach and training materials; and

 

(L) any other activities as the Secretary may reasonably prescribe through notice and comment rulemaking.

 

(2) PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES.—Notwithstanding paragraph (1), an eligible entity receiving a grant under this section may not use the grant funds for any purpose reasonably prohibited by the Secretary through notice and comment rulemaking.

 

(d) Term Of Grants.—Each grant made under this section shall be available for expenditure for a period that is not to exceed 3 years.

 

(e) Applications.—

 

(1) IN GENERAL.—An eligible entity seeking a grant under this section shall submit an application for such grant to the Secretary in accordance with this subsection.

 

(2) PARTNERSHIPS.—In the case of an eligible entity that is a partnership described in section 301(4)(E), the eligible entity may submit a joint application that designates a single entity as the lead entity for purposes of receiving and disbursing funds.

 

(3) CONTENTS.—An application under this subsection shall include—

 

(A) a description of a plan for the program that the eligible entity proposes to carry out with a grant under this section, including a long-term strategy and detailed implementation plan that reflects expected participation of, and partnership with, community groups and appropriate private and public agencies;

 

(B) information on the prevalence of wage and hour violations in each community or State of the eligible entity;

 

(C) information on any industry or geographic area targeted by the plan for such program;

 

(D) information on the type of outreach and relationship building that will be conducted under such program;

 

(E) information on the training and education that will be provided to employees and employers under such program; and

 

(F) the method by which the eligible entity will measure results of such program.

 

(f) Selection.—

 

(1) COMPETITIVE BASIS.—In accordance with this subsection, the Secretary shall, on a competitive basis, select grant recipients from among qualified eligible entities that have submitted an application under subsection (e).

 

(2) PRIORITY.—In selecting grant recipients under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall give priority to eligible entities that—

 

(A) serve employees in any industry or geographic area that is most highly at risk for noncompliance with wage and hour violations, as identified by the Secretary; and

 

(B) demonstrate past and ongoing work to prevent wage and hour violations or to recover unpaid wages.

 

(3) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS.—In selecting grant recipients under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall also consider—

 

(A) the prevalence of ongoing community support for each eligible entity, including financial and other contributions; and

 

(B) the eligible entity's past and ongoing partnerships with other organizations.

 

(g) Memoranda Of Understanding.—

 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after receiving a grant under this section, the grant recipient shall negotiate and finalize with the Administrator a memorandum of understanding that sets forth specific goals, objectives, strategies, and activities that will be carried out under the grant by such recipient through a community partnership.

 

(2) SIGNATURES.—A representative of the grant recipient (or, in the case of a grant recipient that is an eligible entity described in section 301(4)(E), a representative of each entity that composes the grant recipient) and the Administrator shall sign the memorandum of understanding under this subsection.

 

(3) REVISIONS.—The memorandum of understanding under this subsection shall be reviewed and revised by the grant recipient and the Administrator each year of the duration of the grant.

 

(h) Performance Evaluations.—

 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Each grant recipient under this section shall develop procedures for reporting, monitoring, measuring, and evaluating the activities of each program or project funded under this section.

 

(2) GUIDELINES.—The procedures required under paragraph (1) shall be in accordance with guidelines established by the Secretary.

 

(i) Revocation Or Suspension Of Funding.—If the Secretary determines that a recipient of a grant under this section is not in compliance with the terms and requirements of the memorandum of understanding under subsection (g), the Secretary may revoke or suspend (in whole or in part) the funding of the grant.

 

(j) Use Of Components.—The Secretary may use any division or agency of the Department of Labor in carrying out this Act.

 

SEC. 303. GAO STUDY.

 

(a) In General.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study to identify successful programs carried out by grants under section 302, and the elements, policies, or procedures of such programs that can be replicated by other programs carried out by grants under such section.

 

(b) Report.—Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit a report to the Secretary and Congress containing the results of the study conducted under subsection (a).

 

(c) Use Of Information.—The Secretary shall use information contained in the report submitted under subsection (b)—

 

(1) to improve the quality of community partnership programs assisted or carried out under this Act that are in existence as of the publication of the report; and

 

(2) to develop models for new community partnership programs to be assisted or carried out under this Act.

 

SEC. 304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

 

There is authorized to be appropriated $50,000,000 for fiscal year 2017 and for each subsequent fiscal year through fiscal year 2020, to remain available until expended, to carry out the grant program under section 302.

 

TITLE IV—REGULATIONS AND EFFECTIVE DATE

SEC. 401. REGULATIONS.

 

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Labor shall promulgate such regulations as are necessary to carry out this Act, and the amendments made by this Act.

 

SEC. 402. EFFECTIVE DATE.

 

The amendments made by titles I and II shall take effect on the date that is the earlier of—

 

(1) the date that is 6 months after the date on which the final regulations are promulgated by the Secretary of Labor under section 401; and

 

(2) the date that is 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act.

 

More than 30 City of Wylie employees from throughout the organization recently participated in National Incident Management training (NIMS). The training, adoption and implementation of NIMS is required by Homeland Security to receive grants and Federal Preparedness Assistance and Reimbursement.

Governor Abercrombie signed the following bills:

 

House Bill 2052 (Relating to Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) increases access to Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) by updating references from “physicians orders for life-sustaining treatment” to “provider orders for life-sustaining treatment.” The measure also expands health care provider signatory authority to include advance practice registered nurses and corrects inconsistencies of terms describing who may sign a POLST form on behalf of a patient.

 

House Bill 1616 (Relating to Health Planning) adds to the Hawaii State Planning Act’s objectives and policies for health, the identification of social determinants of health and prioritization of programs, services, interventions, and activities that address identified social determinants of health to improve Native Hawaiian health in accordance with federal law and reduce health disparities of disproportionately affected demographics.

 

House Bill 1723 (Relating to Psychiatric Facilities) amends the notice requirements for the discharge of an involuntary patient committed pursuant to legal proceeding involving fitness to proceed and requires the family court to conduct a timely hearing prior to the termination of a standing commitment order.

 

House Bill 2320 (Relating to Health) establishes health equity as a goal for the DOH and requires the DOH to consider social determinants of health in assessing health needs in the state. The measure is known as “Loretta’s Law” for the late DOH Director Loretta Fuddy, who was passionate proponent.

 

House Bill 2581 (Relating to Insurance) establishes the State Innovation Waiver Task Force and requires the task force to submit two interim reports and a final report to the legislature.

 

Senate Bill 2469 (Relating to Telehealth) requires equivalent reimbursement for services, including behavioral health services, provided through telehealth as for the same services provided via face-to-face contact between a health care provider and a patient. The measure also clarifies that health care providers for purposes of telehealth include primary care providers, mental health providers, oral health providers, physicians and osteopathic physicians, advanced practice registered nurses, psychologists, and dentists. For consistency purposes, the bill changes statutory references of “telemedicine” to “telehealth.”

 

House Bill 2400 (Relating to Temporary Disability Benefits) provides temporary disability benefits to employees who suffer disabilities as a result of donating organs.

 

Senate Bill 1233 (Relating to Leaves of Absence) requires certain private employers to allow employees to take leaves of absence for organ, bone marrow, or peripheral blood stem cell donation. Unused sick leave, vacation, or paid time off, or unpaid time off, may be used for these leaves of absence. The measure also requires employers to restore an employee returning from leave to the same or equivalent position and establishes a private right of action for employees seeking enforcement of provisions.

Do you have roadside assistance? Do you need it? Numerous people don't think too much about it but it's something that can eradicate some of the tension in your life. Most people spend at least an hour or two on the streets every day, even if they don't go far. But many never stop to think what they would do if they abruptly discovered themselves stuck on the side of the road.

 

Motor Club of America gives out a broad variety of goods and services to drivers, and people who don't have a car. Those advantages cover all over the United States, Canada & Puerto Rico. Which encompass roadside assistance, emergency room benefits, hotel discounts, travel assistance and many more.

 

Speaking specifically about MCA most popular $19.95 Total Security Motor plan it was designed to offer the highest grade of roadside services and advantages available on the market. This Total Security program presents all of the benefits you would obtain with the Security and Security Plus plans in addition very good roadside services and a number of other exceptional advantages.

 

Emergency Road Service*

Travel Assistance Reimbursement*

Travel Assistance Program*

Trip Planning and Travel Reservations*

Arrest Bond*

Bail Bonds*

Attorneys Fees*

Attorney Services*

Attorney Discounted Hourly Rates*

Discounts on Auto Related Services*

Stolen Vehicle Reward*

Credit Card Protection*

Legal Services Deeply Discounted Fixed Fee Schedule*

Discounts on Prescriptions, Vision Care, and Dental*

Emergency Reimbursement Benefits*

Daily Hospital Benefit*

Accidental Death Benefit*

 

Battery Boost

Fuel Delivery

Tire Change

Lock-Out Service

Wrecker Towing Service

And Much More

 

Emergency Road Service

Motor Club of America will pay up to $100 to provide Emergency Road Service on RVs, Motorcycles, Trailers, and vehicle's with a load capacity of 1 ton or greater.

 

Travel Assistance Reimbursement

If your vehicle is disabled in an auto misfortune, we will reimburse you up to $500 for rental vehicle or lodging, meal, and transportation expenses counting on where the accident happens.

 

Trip Planning & Travel Reservations

Motor Club of America offer a variety of travel benefits with all the roadside service membership plans including route planning and special airline, rental car, and hotel discounts.

 

Arrest Bond

Your Motor Club of America membership card can act in lieu of a cash bail for up to $500 when you are engaged in a traffic violation as allowed by state laws.

 

Bail Bonds

For all of the roadside service and motor club constituents, we can arrange up to a $25,000 bond to release you if you are ascribed with a going traffic law violation when driving a vehicle. This includes for vehicular manslaughter and auto associated negligent murder charges.

 

Attorney Fees

$2,000 in benefits for attorney fees in order to defend you from charges resulting from a covered auto. This includes:

Up to $200 for covered Moving Violations

Up to $500 for covered auto related Personal Injury matters

Up to $500 for covered Vehicle Damage issues

Up to $2,000 for covered auto related Negligent Homicide or Vehicular Manslaughter

 

Stolen Vehicle Reward

Motor Club of America will pay a $5,000 reward to law enforcement agency or individual who provides information that leads to the arrest and conviction of who's responsible for the theft of your covered vehicle in an attempt to encourage stolen vehicle recovery.

 

Discounts on Prescriptions, Vision Care, & Dental

Motor Club of America membership offers a variety of medical discounts up to a 65% discount on prescriptions, up to a 50% discount on vision, and up to a 50% discount on dental procedures.

 

Emergency Reimbursement Benefits

If you are injured in a covered accident, Motor Club of America will provide up to $500 in cash to pay for emergency room or trauma center treatment that is required for injuries caused in the accident. This includes reimbursement for the cost of:

 

Cast or Splints

Lab Work

Nursing Service

Transfusions

Anesthetics

Doctor Care

IV’s

Facility Care

 

Daily Hospital Benefits

Up to $54,500 in cash benefits to be paid at $150 per day for hospitalization that results from injuries received in a covered accident.

 

Accidental Death Benefits

Members of the Total Security program have the opportunity to enroll, free of charge, in one or all of the accidental death and dismemberment coverage packages. These include:

 

1. You, as named member, up to $50,000; or

2. You & your spouse, up to $25,000 each, plus job retraining is available for surviving spouse in many cases; or

3. You for up to $30,000, your spouse up to $15,000, children up to $3,500 each.

Other optional benefits include job retraining for surviving spouse, continuing child care plus continuing education support.

.

Travel Assistance Program

Motor Club of America offers a travel assistant program, which assists in worldwide travel for issues related to injuries or death that results from a covered accident.

 

Medical evacuation & repatriation

Non-Medical Repatriation

Return of Remains

Hospital Visits

Return of Child

Return of Companion

 

Emergency Roadside Assistance

Las Vegas, NV 89117

(702) 810-5812

mca-vegas.info

emergency-roadside-assistance.info

Twitter: twitter.com/VEGASMotorClub

Facebook: www.facebook.com/MotorClubAmericaLV

Youtube: www.youtube.com/user/MCAVegas

 

The Washington Monument is a large, white-colored obelisk at the west end of the National Mall in Washington, D.C. It is a United States Presidential Memorial constructed for George Washington.

The monument is among the world's tallest masonry structures, standing 555 feet (169.29 m) in height and made of marble, granite, and sandstone. It was designed by Robert Mills, a prominent American architect of the 1840s. The actual construction of the monument began in 1848 but was not completed until 1884, almost 30 years after the architect's death. This hiatus in construction was because of a lack of funds and the intervention of the American Civil War. A difference in shading of the marble, visible approximately 150 feet (45 m) up, clearly delineates the initial construction from its resumption in 1876.

Its cornerstone was laid on July 4, 1848; the capstone was set on December 6, 1884, and the completed monument was dedicated on February 21, 1885. It officially opened to the public on October 9, 1888. Upon completion, it became the world's tallest structure, a title it inherited from the Cologne Cathedral and held until 1889, when the Eiffel Tower was finished in Paris, France.

The Washington Monument reflection can be seen in the aptly named Reflecting Pool, a rectangular pool extending to the west, towards the Lincoln Memorial.

 

Among the Founding Fathers of the United States, George Washington earned the title "Father of the Country" in recognition of his leadership in the cause of American independence. Appointed commander of the Continental Army in 1775, he molded a fighting force that won independence from the Kingdom of Great Britain. In 1787, as president of the Constitutional Convention, he helped guide the deliberations to form a government that has lasted for more than 200 years. Two years later he was unanimously elected the President of the United States. Washington defined the Presidency and helped develop the relationships among the three branches of government. He established precedents which successfully launched the new government on its course. He refused the trappings of power and veered from monarchical government and traditions and twice—despite considerable pressure to do otherwise—gave up the most powerful position in the Americas. Washington remained ever mindful of the ramifications of his decisions and actions. With this monument the citizens of the United States show their enduring gratitude and respect.

When the Revolutionary War ended, no man in the United States commanded more respect than George Washington. Americans celebrated his ability to win the war despite limited supplies and inexperienced men, and they admired his decision to refuse a salary and accept only reimbursements for his expenses. Their regard increased further when it became known that he had rejected a proposal by some of his officers to make him king of the new country. It was not only what Washington did but the way he did it: Abigail Adams, wife of John Adams, described him as "polite with dignity, affable without familiarity, distant without haughtiness, grave without austerity, modest, wise, and good."[1]

Washington retired to his plantation at Mount Vernon after the war, but he soon had to decide whether to return to public life. As it became clear the Articles of Confederation had left the federal government too weak to levy taxes, regulate trade, or control its borders, men such as James Madison began calling for a convention that would strengthen its authority. Washington was reluctant to attend because he had business affairs to manage at Mount Vernon. If he did not go to Philadelphia, however, he worried about his reputation and about the future of the country. He finally decided that, since "to see this nation happy… is so much the wish of my soul," he would serve as one of Virginia's representatives. The other delegates during the summer of 1787 chose him to preside over their deliberations, which ultimately produced the U.S. Constitution.[1]

A key part of the Constitution was the development of the office of President of the United States. No one seemed more qualified to fill that position than Washington, and in 1789 he began the first of his two terms. He used the nation's respect for him to develop respect for this new office, but he simultaneously tried to quiet fears that the President would become as powerful as the king the new country had fought against. He tried to create the kind of solid government he thought the nation needed, supporting a national bank, collecting taxes to pay for expenses, and strengthening the Army and Navy. Though many people wanted him to stay for a third term, in 1797 he again retired to Mount Vernon.[1]

Washington died suddenly two years later. His death produced great sadness, and it restarted attempts to honor him. As early as 1783, the Continental Congress had resolved "That an equestrian statue of George Washington be erected at the place where the residence of Congress shall be established." The proposal called for engraving on the statue which explained it had been erected "in honor of George Washington, the illustrious Commander-in-Chief of the Armies of the United States of America during the war which vindicated and secured their liberty, sovereignty, and independence."

Ten days after Washington's death, a Congressional committee recommended a different type of monument. John Marshall, a Representative from Virginia (who later became Chief Justice of the Supreme Court) proposed that a tomb be erected within the Capitol. But a lack of funds, disagreement over what type of memorial would best honor the country's first president, and the Washington family's reluctance to move his body prevented progress on any project. [1] Progress towards a memorial finally began in 1833. That year, which marked the 100th anniversary of Washington's birth, a large group of concerned citizens formed the Washington National Monument Society. They began collecting donations, much in the way Blodgett had suggested. By the middle of the 1830s, they had raised over $28,000 and announced a competition for the design of the memorial.

On September 23, 1835, the board of managers of the society described their expectations:

It is proposed that the contemplated monument shall be like him in whose honor it is to be constructed, unparalleled in the world, and commensurate with the gratitude, liberality, and patriotism of the people by whom it is to be erected… [It] should blend stupendousness with elegance, and be of such magnitude and beauty as to be an object of pride to the American people, and of admiration to all who see it. Its material is intended to be wholly American, and to be of marble and granite brought from each state, that each state may participate in the glory of contributing material as well as in funds to its construction.

The society held a competition for designs in 1836. The winner, architect Robert Mills, was well-qualified for the commission. The citizens of Baltimore had chosen him to build a monument to Washington, and he had designed a tall Greek column surmounted by a statue of the President. Mills also knew the capital well, having just been chosen Architect of Public Buildings for Washington.

His design called for a 600-foot (183 m) tall obelisk—an upright, four-sided pillar that tapers as it rises—with a nearly flat top. He surrounded the obelisk with a circular colonnade, the top of which would feature Washington standing in a chariot. Inside the colonnade would be statues of 30 prominent Revolutionary War heroes.

Yet criticism of Mills' design and its estimated price tag of more than $1 million (over $21 million in 2007USD[2]) caused the society to hesitate. In 1848, its members decided to start building the obelisk and to leave the question of the colonnade for later. They believed that if they used the $87,000 they had already collected to start work, the appearance of the monument would spur further donations that would allow them to complete the project.

About this time Congress donated 37 acres (150,000 m²) of land for the project. The spot Pierre Charles L'Enfant had chosen (now marked by Jefferson Pier) was swampy and unstable, making it unsuitable for supporting the heavy structure. The new location was slightly south and east of the original but still offered many advantages. It "presents a beautiful view of the Potomac," wrote a member of the Society, and "is so elevated that the monument will be seen from all parts of the surrounding country." Because it is public land, he continued, "it is safe from any future obstruction of the view… [and it] would be in full view of Mount Vernon, where rests the ashes of the chief."

[edit]Construction

Excerpted from the 3/15/10 Kinship Circle alert Chile's Animals - Worse Than We Thought. Help Us Be There.

 

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Kinship Circle - info [at] kinshipcircle.org

Date: Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 3:37 PM

Subject: Worse Than We Thought - Letter From Kinship Circle

 

3/15/10: KINSHIP CIRCLE ANIMAL DISASTER AID

Chile's Animals - Worse Than We Thought. Help Us Be There.

 

Animals with broken bones. Eyes cloudy with saltwater.

A kitten cut. Puppies under rubble. There are thousands more, each one a bark and purr unheard... THIS IS CHILE, post-quake.

 

Dear Supporters,

 

I just got off the phone with Kinship Circle's Chile contact. She described the forgotten victims of Chile's 8.8-magnitude earthquake on 2/27/10 -- followed by 20+ aftershocks, some as high as 7.2 and 6.9, and two tsunamis.

 

Socorro Animal Chile, SACH (Animal Relief Chile) is a coalition of Chilean animal protection groups united for the relief of an estimated 700,000 (or more) animals scattered across Dichato, Constitucion and Pichilemu, Chile. SACH sends three veterinarian-led teams into the field daily. They've formally requested assistance from Kinship Circle's disaster response team.

 

SACH has also asked us to raise funds on their behalf, with three main goals to:

 

1. Erect a temporary tent shelter/clinic to care for animals abandoned in the earthquake.

2. Carry out a spay/neuter campaign.

3. Focus on transport and adoption campaigns, particularly in the U.S.

 

SACH needs Kinship Circle Animal Disaster Aid in Chile to assist with:

-- Search and Rescue / Trapping

-- In-Field First Aid

-- Wound Transport to Veterinary Clinics

-- In-Field Sustenance (food/water program)

-- Assessment and Tracking of Animal Populations

-- Emergency Sheltering (once a temporary staging area/clinic is established)

 

WE NEED TO RAISE $500,000.

kinshipcircle.org/donation/

 

I know you have DONATION FATIGUE! We wouldn't ask, with Haiti animal aid still underway, if it weren't critical. I ask for you to reach deep, to help with funding needs outlined below. We can't keep our promise to Chile's animals without funding, as most of our resources went to Haiti work.

 

With deep gratitude,

 

Brenda Shoss, president, Kinship Circle

 

Please donate to Kinship Circle / Animal Relief Chile now:

 

BY MAIL:

Kinship Circle

Animal Relief Chile

7380 Kingsbury Blvd.

St. Louis, MO 63130

 

ONLINE:

kinshipcircle.org/donation/

 

Your donation helps pay for:

**This is to show why we're fundraising. DO NOT SHIP ITEMS TO US.**

 

STAGING AREA/TEMP SHELTER IN CHILE:

-- Large vehicles: 3 SUVs

-- Gas fueled generators

-- Basic veterinary surgical equipment and examining table

-- Basic veterinary clinic equipment, including vaccines, medicines, etc.

-- Subcutaneous fluid bags, lines, needles

-- Portable X-ray machine and light table

-- Fans and portable air conditioners for surgical tents

-- Kennels, run, carriers, cages...for rescued animals

-- Sturdy large tent shelters for clinic, animal sheltering, volunteers

-- Electrical lighting for staging area/volunteer camp at night

-- Fencing

-- Leashes, collars

-- Bowls

-- Litter-boxes & Litter

-- Cat and dog food

-- Water

-- Blankets; Newspaper

-- Trap cages

-- Catch poles

-- Hygiene

-- Refrigerator cold storage of medication

 

VOLUNTEER DEPLOYMENT & GROUND ACTIVITIES:

-- Airfare reimbursement for volunteer deployments

-- Lodging for volunteers, whether in hotel, rented property, or camp

-- Sustenance (food, water) for volunteers + some equipment, such as catchpoles, etc.

-- Administrative costs for web construction, public messaging, long distance communications...

 

A Plea From Earthquake-Stricken Chile

 

Dear Ms. Shoss and Kinship Circle,

 

The earthquake and following tsunami that Chile suffered on the early morning of the 27th of February devastated several small towns close to the coast. Thousands of animals are silent victims of this catastrophe. Hundreds of dogs live with their owners in shelters and thousands roam the ruins of towns and cities. The dogs' guardians have lost everything and do not have the resources to feed their animals. Some opted to abandon them.

 

Chilean animal welfare groups and veterinarians decided to work together to help animals and created Socorro Animal Chile (Animal Relief Chile).

 

Socorro Animal Chile (Animal Relief Chile) formally requests assistance from Kinship Circle for our animal aid operation in Dichato, Constitucion and Pichilemu, Chile. We need trained animal disaster responders and rescue and veterinary specialists. On behalf of the animal organizations in SACH/Animal Relief Chile, we ask that Kinship Circle deploy its team to Chile to work within our animal disaster plan, in response to Chile's earthquake.

 

We also ask Kinship Circle to temporarily receive donations in the United States on behalf of Socorro Animal Chile. We urgently need funding to sustain our work for animals. Difficult bureaucratic steps necessary to opening a Paypal account ourselves, in Chile, have prompted SACH to request financial aid from other countries, especially the United States. That is the reason we ask Kinship Circle to accept funds on our behalf.

 

For all your help I am grateful,

 

Alejandra Cassino, Chief Coordinator

Adriana De La Garza, International Affairs

Socorro Animal Chile / Animal Relief Chile

 

FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT ANIMAL RELIEF CHILE

www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=329459149031&ref=ts

www.sach.bligoo.cl/

 

Kinship Circle Animal Disaster Aid is a nonprofit that mobilizes volunteers and resources for animal victims through its network of trained responders in the U.S. and Canada. www.kinshipcircle.org/disasters

 

* DONATE TO CHILE OR HAITI ANIMAL RELIEF FUNDS:

www.kinshipcircle.org/donation

 

* DONATE BY CHECK OR MONEY ORDER:

Kinship Circle / 7380 Kingsbury Blvd. / St. Louis, MO 63130

 

*********************

 

ACTION CAMPAIGNS * EDUCATION * ANIMAL DISASTER AID NETWORK

www.KinshipCircle.org * www.kinshipcircle.org/disasters

 

SIGN-UP FOR BREAKING NEWS & ACTION: subscribe [at] kinshipcircle.org

* Action campaigns on animal cruelty issues worldwide

* Animal rescue coordination/news in disasters

 

UNSUBSCRIBE

* Select a Kinship Circle ALERT received in your mailbox

* Hit "FORWARD" + Send to: info [at] kinshipcircle.org

* Type UNSUBSCRIBE in your subject line and hit send

Governor Abercrombie signed the following bills:

 

House Bill 2052 (Relating to Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) increases access to Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) by updating references from “physicians orders for life-sustaining treatment” to “provider orders for life-sustaining treatment.” The measure also expands health care provider signatory authority to include advance practice registered nurses and corrects inconsistencies of terms describing who may sign a POLST form on behalf of a patient.

 

House Bill 1616 (Relating to Health Planning) adds to the Hawaii State Planning Act’s objectives and policies for health, the identification of social determinants of health and prioritization of programs, services, interventions, and activities that address identified social determinants of health to improve Native Hawaiian health in accordance with federal law and reduce health disparities of disproportionately affected demographics.

 

House Bill 1723 (Relating to Psychiatric Facilities) amends the notice requirements for the discharge of an involuntary patient committed pursuant to legal proceeding involving fitness to proceed and requires the family court to conduct a timely hearing prior to the termination of a standing commitment order.

 

House Bill 2320 (Relating to Health) establishes health equity as a goal for the DOH and requires the DOH to consider social determinants of health in assessing health needs in the state. The measure is known as “Loretta’s Law” for the late DOH Director Loretta Fuddy, who was passionate proponent.

 

House Bill 2581 (Relating to Insurance) establishes the State Innovation Waiver Task Force and requires the task force to submit two interim reports and a final report to the legislature.

 

Senate Bill 2469 (Relating to Telehealth) requires equivalent reimbursement for services, including behavioral health services, provided through telehealth as for the same services provided via face-to-face contact between a health care provider and a patient. The measure also clarifies that health care providers for purposes of telehealth include primary care providers, mental health providers, oral health providers, physicians and osteopathic physicians, advanced practice registered nurses, psychologists, and dentists. For consistency purposes, the bill changes statutory references of “telemedicine” to “telehealth.”

 

House Bill 2400 (Relating to Temporary Disability Benefits) provides temporary disability benefits to employees who suffer disabilities as a result of donating organs.

 

Senate Bill 1233 (Relating to Leaves of Absence) requires certain private employers to allow employees to take leaves of absence for organ, bone marrow, or peripheral blood stem cell donation. Unused sick leave, vacation, or paid time off, or unpaid time off, may be used for these leaves of absence. The measure also requires employers to restore an employee returning from leave to the same or equivalent position and establishes a private right of action for employees seeking enforcement of provisions.

Governor Abercrombie signed the following bills:

 

House Bill 2052 (Relating to Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) increases access to Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) by updating references from “physicians orders for life-sustaining treatment” to “provider orders for life-sustaining treatment.” The measure also expands health care provider signatory authority to include advance practice registered nurses and corrects inconsistencies of terms describing who may sign a POLST form on behalf of a patient.

 

House Bill 1616 (Relating to Health Planning) adds to the Hawaii State Planning Act’s objectives and policies for health, the identification of social determinants of health and prioritization of programs, services, interventions, and activities that address identified social determinants of health to improve Native Hawaiian health in accordance with federal law and reduce health disparities of disproportionately affected demographics.

 

House Bill 1723 (Relating to Psychiatric Facilities) amends the notice requirements for the discharge of an involuntary patient committed pursuant to legal proceeding involving fitness to proceed and requires the family court to conduct a timely hearing prior to the termination of a standing commitment order.

 

House Bill 2320 (Relating to Health) establishes health equity as a goal for the DOH and requires the DOH to consider social determinants of health in assessing health needs in the state. The measure is known as “Loretta’s Law” for the late DOH Director Loretta Fuddy, who was passionate proponent.

 

House Bill 2581 (Relating to Insurance) establishes the State Innovation Waiver Task Force and requires the task force to submit two interim reports and a final report to the legislature.

 

Senate Bill 2469 (Relating to Telehealth) requires equivalent reimbursement for services, including behavioral health services, provided through telehealth as for the same services provided via face-to-face contact between a health care provider and a patient. The measure also clarifies that health care providers for purposes of telehealth include primary care providers, mental health providers, oral health providers, physicians and osteopathic physicians, advanced practice registered nurses, psychologists, and dentists. For consistency purposes, the bill changes statutory references of “telemedicine” to “telehealth.”

 

House Bill 2400 (Relating to Temporary Disability Benefits) provides temporary disability benefits to employees who suffer disabilities as a result of donating organs.

 

Senate Bill 1233 (Relating to Leaves of Absence) requires certain private employers to allow employees to take leaves of absence for organ, bone marrow, or peripheral blood stem cell donation. Unused sick leave, vacation, or paid time off, or unpaid time off, may be used for these leaves of absence. The measure also requires employers to restore an employee returning from leave to the same or equivalent position and establishes a private right of action for employees seeking enforcement of provisions.

via

 

Nobody likes getting shots. No matter how skilled the person doing the injecting may be, they hurt – and some hurt a lot. The fear of going to the doctor and getting a shot is something that starts when we’re little and our parents take us for vaccinations, but we were given lollipops and stickers and told that the immunizations would keep us safe and let us grow big and strong. Unfortunately, that is not always the case.

 

There’s no doubt that vaccinations save lives, and in the vast majority of cases they cause absolutely no harm beyond a twinge or a low-grade fever — maybe a rash. But there are many documented cases in which the most commonly-administered vaccines have caused real and long-lasting harm — enough so that the federal government established a compensation program in 1988 that was specifically designed to provide financial support and reimbursement for those who have been harmed.

 

The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program provides victims of vaccine injuries with a no-fault process for claiming benefits: it is a straightforward and stress-free alternative to pursuing legal action against vaccine companies and health care providers. The government introduced the program out of fear of a return of diseases that had previously been eradicated: if vaccine providers were forced to fight lawsuits, the legal costs could lead to them discontinuing vaccines and the publicity would discourage citizens from getting the immunizations that they needed.

 

The process of filing a claim with the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program does not require representation by an attorney, but having a lawyer navigate the process is the best way to ensure that all the appropriate scientific and medical documentation is collected and prepared in a way that best advances your petition and proves that the symptoms and injury have been caused by a vaccine. An attorney will also ensure that all deadlines are met. For families struggling with the aftermath of a vaccine injury, taking care of paperwork is one less thing to worry about – and the program pays the legal fees for all claims that are approved.

 

Not every vaccine is covered by the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, and not every illness has been connected to having been immunized. The vaccines that are currently on the government’s compensation program list are:

 

DTAP

 

Hemophilus Influenzae Type B (hib)

 

Hepatitis A

 

Hepatitis B

 

Human Papillomavirus (HPV)

 

Influenza (Flu Vaccine)

 

Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR, MR, M, R)

 

Meningococcal

 

Pertussis (Whooping Cough)

 

Pneumococcal Conjugate

 

Polio

 

Rotavirus

 

Tetanus

 

Varicella (Chicken Pox)

 

There are many adverse side effects that can arise from getting an immunization. The most common are mild and temporary, including low-grade fever, pain at injection site, rash and flu-like symptoms. Injuries that are more long-lasting include physical damage to the area of injection, including permanent swelling and tenderness, lumps or nodules, and injuries to the nerves. Some patients receiving injections suffer rotator cuff injuries or frozen shoulder. If six months go by and these symptoms have not resolved, you are likely to be eligible for compensation for your injuries.

 

Other severe vaccine injuries and illnesses that are eligible for compensation from the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program include:

 

Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis

 

Arthritis

 

Brain Damage

 

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy

 

Diabetes Type 1

 

Guillain-Barre Syndrome

 

Optic Neuritis

 

Paralysis

 

POTS

 

Rash

 

Seizures

 

Transverse Myelitis

 

Death

 

If you or your child have suffered an injury or been diagnose with an illness that was caused by a vaccine, it is essential that you begin the process of filing a claim with the Vaccine Injury

 

Compensation Program as soon as possible. Doing so can provide you with compensation for the medical expenses you’ve already incurred, as well as the related medical bills you may incur in the future. You can also get up to $250,000 in compensation for pain and suffering you’ve suffered and can anticipate suffering, any lost wages, and more, but in order to be eligible all claims must be filed within the U.S. Court of Federal Claims within three years from the first appearance of symptoms, or two years from the date of a vaccine-related death.

 

At Shebell & Shebell, we believe that families that have suffered due to vaccine injuries have already paid too much in aggravation and pain, so we pay all the upfront costs of representing your case. You pay no fees – we will seek reimbursement for our costs from the government after we’ve won your case for you. Our goal is to make sure that you are well served by a skilled and knowledgeable attorney. Contact us today to set up a free consultation and learn more about your rights.

 

The post Getting a Shot Can Hurt More Than You Think appeared first on Shebell & Shebell LLC - Personal Injury Lawyers.

 

from Shebell & Shebell LLC – Personal Injury Lawyers shebell.com/getting-shot-can-hurt-think/ shebellshebell.tumblr.com/post/160814044994

1 2 ••• 4 5 7 9 10 ••• 79 80