View allAll Photos Tagged Note
PLEASE TAKE NOTE.....Myself and Wetbag were approached here at this location between Wootton Rivers and New Mill on the Berks & Hants route on Thursday 22 April 2021 by the farmer who does not take kindly to railway photographers on his private land. In the interest of "keeping the peace" with this gentleman, and respecting his request, it might be prudent for anyone else who visits the area to keep away, at least for now? Mark J.
To see hundreds more photographs from the 1980’s, through to today, please go to my main website:
table158photography.weebly.com/
This is 6M15 07:07 Tytherington - Calvert near Wootton Rivers hauled by 66020.
مسَآكم آلله بآليل لوول
كيف حآلكم عسآكم مرتآحين
لآ حد يتخبرني عن الصوره وشسآلفة النظارات خخ مخليني علاقه وانا مآ آدري ><
واذا حبيتو الصوره ضغطو على حرف الـ
F
Ask Me! Formspring
6494 . 30 0 140 . 20231231
“with successive blind windows as my objects of research, my travelling companions, my signposts.”
Peter Handke, Repetition (Ralph Manheim trans. (1988) of Die Wiederholung (1986))
A miniature version of our bestselling love note necklace, this one features a smaller solid envelope charm in antiqued gold. The envelope has a nice texture to it and carries a secret love note inside! A small "I Love You" charm is the perfect surprise for a loved one! It hangs on a sturdy antiqued gold chain.
My Aunt Mae wrote this 51 years ago to my mom and dad (her brother). I am guessing it was a reference to her 50th wedding anniversary. A fascinating takeaway was I certainly did not know my uncle Neal was actually Neale.
Now & then I like to use some Instax, too. I love the colour of this film and the contrasts it can produce, I love its stability... but I hate the bulkiness and the poor maneuverability of the camera. Taking this camera with me is a pain in the backpack, though results are often very pleasant. If you want to see more of my Instax shots, you'll have to visit my LomoHome at bit.ly/ADGlomo.
.
Camera: Lomo'Instant Wide
.
In the meanwhile visit my Etsy shop for my Instant Art at www.etsy.com/shop/AleDiGangi
move your mouse pointer over the red square!
for more informations go to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Switzerland
Note that only about half the kilns have roofs. I talked to a county worker while I was there and he said the county simply doesn't have the money to preserve the kilns. They're falling apart and it is enormously expensive to stabilize them, let alone preserve them.
I made these for Mother's Day: value pack of 50 cards/envelopes from Joann's, alphabet stamp pad, and precious scraps of Flea Market Fancy fabric.
Diamond Bus (North West) Limited 40715 SK18 TKX, a Wrightbus StreetDeck HEV with a H45/29F body built 2018 in Bury Interchange departing with the 15:20 Bury Interchange to Manchester (Oldham Street) 163 service. Tuesday 1st September 2020
Note, SK18 TKX was first registered in May 2018 and originally operated as a demonstrator by Wrightbus. It arrived with Diamond Bus (North West) Limited in November 2019 and was acquired as number 40715 in December 2019
SK18 TKX retained its Ulsterbus Limited fleet number 5001 below the fuel filler location from when it was operated in July 2019
Ref no Nikon D7200 4th series - DSC_3891
Note the Cleveland Crib (in red) on the background. It's about 3 miles from the shore and provides water to the city.
This is the result of a rare event - the lake still warm, a sudden extreme cold and windy front coming from the north, the waves wash everything and creates several layers of ice on everything it touches. This is at Edgewater Park near the pier. All plants, rocks, bridges, etc have a very thick coat of ice. Note the big blocks of ice surrounding the very thin grasses.
This is almost untouched. The most I did on this image was changing a little bit of brightness and saturation.
SAN FRANCISCO, CA - March 25 - Nicole Vogel, Karen Bradley, Michael Novogradac, Lucy Ridgway and Jessie Peterson attend UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospitals Notes & Words on March 25th 2023 at Fox Theater @ 1807 Telegraph Ave, Oakland, CA 94612 US in San Francisco, CA (Photo - Dave Zahrobsky for Drew Altizer Photography)
3D red/cyan anaglyph created from glass plate stereograph at Library of Congress - Prints & Photographs Online Catalog: www.loc.gov/pictures/
LOC Title: Manassas, Virginia. Fortifications
Date: March 1862
Photographer: The LOC gives credit to George N. Barnard – a second card version from “Brady’s Album Gallery” of this same image indicates “Barnard & Gibson” (James Gibson).
Link to glass plate: www.loc.gov/pictures/collection/civwar/item/2018671825/
Notes: Seldom seen in 3D, a stereograph of Union soldiers inside the Confederate fortifications at Manassas, after the surprise evacuation of the Confederate Army in March 1862.
Apparently the March evacuation surprised the North, as well as President Jefferson Davis in the South, who later claimed he wasn't informed of it, expecting his army to hold its ground instead of retreating back towards Richmond. Davis and Gen. Joe Johnston argued about this movement for years after the war ended. Union Gen. McClellan was criticized for not advancing on Manassas sooner, and took heat from Congress after it became known that many of the Confederate works held only "Quaker guns," - tree trunks made to look like cannons.
Below is some additional background information on the fortifications and evacuation, and a couple extracts of the sensational type articles, appearing in the press, on the awful treatment (by both sides) of the dead at Manassas.
For those still interested, at the very bottom is a small sampling of the back and forth arguments carried on between Jefferson Davis and Gen. Johnston, a quarter century later, concerning the Manassas evacuation.
-----------------------
Barnard & Gibson took several photographs of these same fortifications, one of which is included in Alexander Gardner’s Photographic Sketch Book, as plate 11. Below is the description of the scene from the Sketchbook.
Gardner’s Photographic Sketch Book of the War, Vol.,1
Plate 11. Fortifications at Manassas.
"This sketch represents a portion of the Confederate fortifications at Manassas after their occupation by the Union Army. The works were laid out by General Beauregard, well known as an engineer of great ability; but their construction illustrates the inexperience in military matters of the men who rallied at this spot to resist the authority of the Government. The casks were filled with earth, and were intended to supply the lack of more suitable gabions, but would have offered very little resistance to artillery. The flooring was laid for the use of the guns, the four short posts marking the embrasure. The interior of the works was badly drained, and the trenches were almost constantly filled with stagnant water. The fortifications formed a semi-circle about four miles in length, but contiguous to this position were the ridges and earthworks of Centreville, extending the line to nearly fifteen miles. The armament consisted principally of six and twelve pounder field batteries, with a few old fashioned thirty-twos, brought from the Norfolk Navy Yard. Located, however, upon high tabled-land, bounded by ravines and the most impenetrable thickets bordering Bull Run, the works did not require very heavy ordinance. Had they been assaulted, the musket and bayonet would have proved far more serviceable in repelling the attack than artillery, although there is no doubt that the small number of heavy cannon was attributable to their scarcity in the South rather than to confidence in the natural strength of the position. The fortifications are now rapidly being leveled, and in a few years will have entirely disappeared. The soil composing them is of a light character, and washed away in every rain, filling up the ditches and reducing the sharply defined works to sloping mounds, over which the farmer’s plow is already turning the furrow."
--------------------------
New York Herald
Wednesday, March 12, 1862
MANASSAS EVACUATED
The Retreat of the Rebels from Centreville, Occoquan, Fairfax Court House, Winchester and Manassas.
The Rebel Stronghold Occupied by Union Troops
The Latest Details.
“Washington, March 11, 1862. The whole rebel fortifications at Manassas were abandoned and everything possible burned. Our troops occupy the place.
Before dark last night, Colonel Averill, with a large body of cavalry, entered the far famed rebel works at Manassas Junction, and bivouacked for the night amidst the ruins of the rebel stronghold, with the Stars and Stripes glittering in the brilliant moonlight.
In their march from Centreville no signs of the rebels were discovered. The fields that were a few months ago ensangined with the blood of contending armies and resonant with the sound of booming cannon and rolling musketry, the shouts of marshalled hosts and the groans of the dying, was silent and deserted. The fortifications which so lately bristled with the artillery and gleaming bayonets of the rebel force, were bare and blackened. The retreating rebels had swept it with the besom of destruction that had everywhere marked their departure. They were all gone, horse, foot and dragoons. They had slit their tents with their swords, and set fire to all that was inflamable. Nothing was left except the bare and blackened walls and the smouldering ashes of the bonfires made of their tents, baggage, equipments and stores, for which they could find no transportation….
Everything at Manassas indicates precipitate flight on the part of the rebels. All the log huts are standing, and an immense number of canvass tents. Some caissons were found, but no guns. Piles of bullets and cartridges were left in the tents, and an immense quantity of quartermaster stores. In one place were discovered about thirty thousand bushels of corn, which had been set fire to and was still smouldering.
They brought back abundant rebel trophies, pack saddles, army orders, muskets, revolvers, bowie knives, letters, &c. Over one thousand pack saddles were found, all new, and marked “C.S.A.”
________________
The New York Herald
Saturday, March 15, 1862
“The desire to visit Manassas is becoming so prevalent that it is now styled the “Manassas mania.” Increasing crowds visit the place daily, taking Centreville and Bull run in the route. It is amusing to note the diversified trophies that are brought back. A surgeon showed me three skulls he succeeded in getting. He says he know they are skulls of secessionists, because, in the first place, they were dug upon ground occupied by the rebels during the Bull run fight; and, secondly, because of their thickness….
Captain McRelvy tells me that he counted over two hundred dead horses strewn along the roads. The story about their throats being cut is untrue. They all died of exhaustion and disease. He also learned that great mortality existed among the troops when the evacuation took place.
A number of contrabands came in to-day. They were sent to Washington.”
_______________
Chicago Tribune
Tuesday, March 18, 1862
The Gibraltar of Virginia.
[From the New York Evening Post, 13th.]
"….It is acknowledged by those who have examined the works of Manassas that an army encamped there, and which for so many months occupied our own army of 200,000 men, and with its “Quaker” guns and ingenious boldness of pickets so deceived our military authorities—that this great Manassas did not really number sixty thousand men; while the “Gibraltar of Virginia” is nothing but an immense humbug. It is not very surprising that Englishmen, who like Sir James Freguson and others, visited the Manassas lines, and afterwards saw, within our own, what a vast force the rebels were holding in check with their small army, went home despising the “Federals,” and full of admiration of the rebels and their faith in their success.”
_______________
The Burlington Weekly Hawk-eye.
Saturday, May 03, 1862.
Rebel Outrages on the dead.
“WASHINGTON, April 30.—The Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War made a lengthy report regarding the treatment by the rebels at Manassas of the remains of Federal officers and soldiers killed there. They say the facts disclosed are of painful, repulsive and shocking character—that the rebels have crowned this rebellion by the perpetration of deeds unknown even to savage warfare. Investigations have established this beyond controversy….The outrages on the dead will revive the recollections of the cruelties to which savage tribes subject their prisoners. They were buried, in many cases, with their faces downward—they were left to decay in the open air, their bones being carried off as trophies; sometimes, as the testimony proves, to be used as personal ornaments; one witness deliberately avows that the head of one of our most gallant officers was cut off by a Secessionist to be used as a drinking cup on the occasion of his marriage.”
_______________
Below is a relatively brief extract of a lengthy 1885 article – a response from Gen. Johnston to Jefferson Davis’ criticisms of his generalship, in Davis’ 1881 book, “Rise and Fall of the Confederacy.” I‘ve transcribed the opening paragraph to help get your bearings, and then I skip 11 pages to the part where Johnston defends his handling of the Manassas evacuation, and where he quantifies the amount of Confederate materials lost in it; how it was not his fault – the fault belonged to the Government (i.e. Jefferson Davis).
The Century Illustrated Monthly Magazine
Volume 30, May 1885 to October 1885
Manassas to Seven Pines - by Gen. Joseph E. Johnston
A REPLY TO JEFFERSON DAVIS…
“When the State of Virginia seceded, being a citizen of that State, I resigned my office in the United States Army. And as I had seen a good deal of military service, in the Seminole and Mexican wars and in the West, the President of the Confederacy offered me a commission in the highest grade in his army. I accepted the offer because the invasion of the South was inevitable. But I soon incurred Mr. Davis's displeasure by protesting against an illegal act of his by which I was greatly wronged. Still he retained me in important positions, although his official letters were harsh. In 1864, however, he degraded me to the utmost of his power by summarily removing me from a high command. Believing that he was prompted to this act by animosity , and not by dispassionate opinion , I undertake to prove this animosity by many extracts from his “Rise and Fall of the Confederacy ” ( D. Appleton & Co .: 1881 ) , and my comments thereon . [This was the opening paragraph of Johnston’s article. –PT]
[Skipping 11 pages to Johnston’s account of the Manassas Evacuation]
“By a singular freak of the President's memory, it transferred the substance of these passages from his letter to my three. Referring again to the conference at Fairfax Court House,
Mr. Davis says ( page 464):
“Soon thereafter, the army withdrew to Centreville, a better position for defense, but not for attack, and thereby suggestive of the abandonment of an intention to advance.”
…..On the 20th of February, after a discussion in Richmond, his cabinet being present, the President directed me to prepare to fall back from Manassas, and do so as soon as practicable. I returned to Manassas on February 21, and on the 22d ordered the proper officers to remove the public property, which was begun on the 23d…The Government had collected three million and a quarter pounds of provisions there, I insisted on a supply of but a million and a half. It also had two million pounds in a meat-curing establishment near at hand, and herds of live stock besides. On the 9th of March, when the ground had become firm enough for military operations, I ordered the army to march that night, thinking then, as I do now, that the fifteen days was time enough in which to subordinate an army to the Commissary Department. About one million pounds of this provision were abandoned, besides half as much more spoiled for want of shelter. This loss is represented (page 468) as so great as to embarrass us to the end of the war, although it was only six days’ supply for the troops then in Virginia. Ten times as much was in railroad stations of North Carolina at the end of the war.
Mr. Davis says (page 467):
“it was regretted that earlier and more effective means were not employed for the mobilization of the army,…or at least that the withdrawal was not so deliberate as to secure the removal of our ordnance, subsistence, and quartermaster’s stores.”
The quartermaster’s and ordnance stores were brought off; and as to subsistence, the Government, which collected immediately on the frontier five times the quantity of provisions wanted is responsible for the losses. The President suggested the time of withdrawal himself, in the interview in his office that has been mentioned. The means taken, was the only one available,--the Virginia Midland Railroad.”
************************
Red/Cyan (not red/blue) glasses of the proper density must be used to view 3D effect without ghosting. Anaglyph prepared using red cyan glasses from The Center For Civil War Photography / American Battlefield Trust. CCWP Link: www.civilwarphotography.org/