View allAll Photos Tagged Integrity
Integrity Salesroom 10/13/2016 As long as I was sharing with friends, I figured may as well display them. It was for about an hour since I did have to get them back in my room before table hosting. Eugenia and Vanessa
Algoma Integrity - En face de Ste-Pétronille I.O. - En descente sur le fleuve St-Laurent pour Port Cartier Qc.
Algoma - Vracquier - IMO 9405162 - Pavillon Canada
Prise de Vue: Olympus OM-D E-M10 M II - Pointe Ste-Pétronille I.O. Qc.
Algoma integrity - In front of Ste-Petronille O.I. - Downbound on the St-Lawrence River to Port cartier Qc.
Algoma - Bulkcarrier - IMO 9405162 - Flag Canada
Photo Taken: Olympus OM-D E-M10 M II - Ste-Petronille O.I. Point Qc.
Jason Wu's Dolls Nu Face Agency & Fashion Royalty:
Erin Salston The Making Of(2009), Lukas Maverick Style Strategy(2009), Takeo Mizutani In The Mix(2009), Kyori Sato Flight Pattern(2009).
A City of Salford coat of arms on preserved former Salford City Transport 112 TRJ 112, a Daimler CVG6 built 1962 with a Metropolitan-Cammell H37/28R body. Saturday 12th June 2010
Ref no Canon EOS50D 2nd series - IMG_6417
First new doll of 2013. I've had her for some time, but getting her an outfit (and hair...) took some time. That and finding the time to put her in front of a camera. But I love her.
THE CLIMATE CHANGE SCAM.
The facts:
CO2 is a trace gas, it makes up only 0.04% of the atmosphere.
Expressed as a fraction, that is: four hundredths of one percent!
Only 3% of the total CO2 in the atmosphere is due to human activity
That is: three percent of four hundredths of one percent of CO2 in the atmosphere is likely to be caused by humans!
97% of the total CO2 in the atmosphere is from from natural sources
The UK only produced slightly over 1.% (1.02%) of the world's 3% total of CO2 caused by human activity!
That is: the UK produced around one hundredth
of the three percent total CO2 caused by humans!
The UK’s CO2 emissions have fallen by around 42% since 1990
CO2 is highly beneficial and crucial for life and plant growth.
An increase of CO2 would improve plant growth and reforestation.
The UK produces slightly over one hundredth of the human caused total of 3 percent (three hundredths) of the total four hundredths of one percent of CO2 in the atmosphere.
If you think that is a tiny, insignificant amount, you are perfectly correct.
All life is based on carbon, it is an essential food for plants. Plants obtain carbon from CO2 (Carbon Dioxide).
They separate the carbon from the oxygen which they release into the atmosphere.
The oxygen they release is also essential for life.
The idea that CO2 is a poison, or something undesirable, is preposterous nonsense. it is not based on good science, but politics, ideology and vested interests.
The amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is very small compared to other gases, such as nitrogen, but it is essential.
The amount that humans contribute to the total CO2 is negligible. The vastly overwhelming amount - 97% is produced naturally. The idea that the other 3 percent, caused by humans, will destroy the planet is ridiculous.
Records going back centuries show that natural temperature rises are followed a rise in CO2, not the other way round. As the sea gets warmer it releases more CO2, a purely natural process. The most likely cause of the increase in temperature is activity on the Sun. The records show that it is an increase in temperature that causes an increase in CO2. This is not necessarily bad. A generally warmer climate caused by the Sun, with the resulting increase in CO2 is ideal for plant growth and a greener planet.
So, is CO2 a cause of global warming or climate change? Extremely unlikely!
You may ask; what about the scientific consensus, the claim that 97% of scientists agree that CO2 is a cause of climate change?
a) If something is repeated often enough, many people end up believing it. That’s how propaganda works.
b) Most scientists are not climate scientists, they work in other fields. They tend to respect the findings/opinions of other scientists, because they trust the scientific integrity of their peers, above any vested interests.
c) A consensus in science is not proof of anything. Scientific truth is not a democratic decision, it is not decided by a consensus, however large. That is a political concept, not a scientific one.
In science, empirical evidence is king.
The idea that a consensus opinion makes something beyond doubt, or unable to be challenged is an anathema to genuine scientific endeavour.
Science doesn’t work like that.
To impose a straightjacket on science is a fanatical position, which has the hallmark of ideological fanaticism. It is anti-science and a deplorable situation.
The common, political currency seems to be that anyone who dares to challenge the present, climate change opinion is a science denier, a term of abuse which is intended to imply they are wilfully ignorant, evil or even criminal.
That is an appalling situation. And very damaging for freedom of expression and the future of science. Scientific practice is a search for truth, not an ideology, or a political football. No genuine scientist, who has any integrity, can ever support such a situation. Any scientist who claims that manmade climate change is an irrefutable fact, or that issue is settled and the debate is over, is a disgrace to science.
There is no such thing as a ‘climate change denier’. It is a meaningless insult, invented by fanatical ideologues. All honest scientists would agree that any scientific opinion or hypothesis is only as good as the latest bit of evidence.
Inconvenient facts, the science that Al Gore doesn't want you to know:
binged.it/2WJoiRX
Piers Corbyn (brother of Jeremy Corbyn) - manmade climate change does not exist.
youtu.be/UvHMhZ1T964
Patrick Moore (one of the founders of Greenpeace) A dearth of carbon?
Dr. Moore says we were literally running out of carbon before we started to pump it back into the atmosphere, “CO2 has been declining to where it is getting close to the end of plant life, and in another 1.8 million years, life would begin to die on planet Earth for lack of CO2.”
According to Moore it is life itself that has been consuming carbon and storing it in carbonaceous rocks. He goes on to say, “billions of tons of carbonaceous rock represent carbon dioxide pulled out of the atmosphere, and because the Earth has cooled over the millennia, nature is no longer putting CO2 into the atmosphere to offset this.”
youtu.be/sXxktLAsBPo
Princeton physics professor William Happer explains why he describes some climate change scientists as a ‘cult.’
youtu.be/vro-yn59uso
Who trusts the MSM?
Their lies are not just fake news, they deliberately set out to slander those who don’t agree with the liberal left, globalist elite. Their lies are positively evil. Everyone should watch this video and they will never trust the media again: banned.video/watch?id=5f00ca7c672706002f4026a9
New NASA satellite data prove carbon dioxide is GREENING the Earth and restoring forests.
www.afinalwarning.com/500086.html?fbclid=IwAR2SoywjkPYu8-...
The latest Vegetation Index data from NASA shows that the Earth is getting progressively "greener" and lusher over time. The planet is 10 percent greener today than it was in 2000, NASA says, which means better conditions for growing crops. Forests are also expanding while deserts are becoming more fertile and usable for agriculture. All in all, the global Vegetation Index rose from 0.0936 to 0.1029 between 2000 and 2021, a 9.94 percent increase. "10 percent greening in 20 years! We are incredibly fortunate!" announced Zoe Phin, a researcher who compiled the data into a chart for her blog. "I just wish everyone felt that way. But you know not everyone does. To the extent that humans enhance global greening is precisely what social parasites want to tax and regulate. No good deed goes unpunished." A separate German study found that the globe has been greening for at least the past three decades. Satellite imagery suggests that vegetation has been expanding at a growing rate, contracting the gloom-and-doom narrative being spread by the climate alarmists.