View allAll Photos Tagged Humiliated
There are certainunruly feelings in of which temptation is the strongest one. It always tries to lead a man towards selfishness. When grown unmanageable it drags one’s mind from the original seat of virtue and leads one to move in wilderness ----- in the region of false, illegal or uncertain hopes. Temptation in a mind acts like a piece of iron near some powerful magnet. It aims and jumps on an object from which it cannot free itself.
Temptation alone is sufficient to destroy the moral excellence of man. It misleads an individual or a nation by making the individual or the nation mad to process the belongings of others. It is also responsible for many a catastrophe, devastation, blood-shed, disaster, humiliation and danger which at times claim a heavy tool of human life and property. It also threatens the very existence of many other species --- essential for maintaining nature’s balance.
In this world of good and evil, virtue and vice, greed and avarice there must be temptation; but one should not yield to it. Moreover, how can a man develop the strength of his character if he is not confronted with temptation? Man is composed of animality and rationality but he cannot root out the one for the improvement of the other. In his physical side he is equipped with hard, soft and delicate organs while the varieties of feelings such as the fierceness of a tiger, meekness of a lamb, neatness of cat, dirtiness of a pig, cleverness of a fox, foolishness of a turtle etc., wonderfully associate in him. The passions, impulses and emotions are given to him definitely for fulfilling some useful purpose provided those are allowed to work within a desirable limit. But the total killing of passions would seriously affect his growth and progress. For instance, we cannot improve our mental faculty by denying our physical side. And how can there be rationality in absence of animality? We know that fruit is the final outcome of a seed; but the fruit cannot grow without the flower and flower cannot come without the leaves and so on. Similarly, the growth of spirituality is based on morality and morality arises from passion. Do we not find that vanity gives rise to humility, hatred to love, jealousy to sympathy and enmity to friendship only when those are kept under proper control? Therefore, a man should keep a balance of his passions in order to get a good result.
The controlling of a passion increases the strength of mind. As soon as temptation vibrates the mind, it should be arrested and sent back to its prison hole so that the mind is not tossed with the waves of uneasiness. This power can be acquired by gradual steps. As for example, if you find some valuables lying on the road, never be tempted to have them. Because, those are decidedly the product of some body’s tear and toil. You will do well if you can put them under the care of some competent authority for their proper disposal. But you need not keep them and run after the owner by wasting a sufficient length of time.
On the other hand, if this feeling is allowed to play without any restriction and thus secures for itself an upper hand, it will make one not only low in the estimation of others but will lead one to misery and destruction. This fact may be well understood from the following instances mentioned below.
1. A man withtemptation was once travelling in a railway train. He was sitting in a compartment amidst the uncompromising passengers; --- some of whom were enjoying a reward of lying at full length while others were paying a heavy penalty by keeping themselves standing. This particular man was rather neutral, sitting between the two extreme situations. During its journey, the train was stopping at some station to pick up new passengers and also for dropping the intending ones. This man noticed that a passenger boarded their compartment, at some intermediate station, with a new steel trunk of remarkable size, but left the train in the next station without taking back his trunk which was kept on the bunk of the carriage. The train was running on and on. People opened their trunks and suitcases to have their useful things, but this man was occupied with the thought of taking possession of the deserted trunk. He was tempted to make a good fortune out of the contents of the trunk.
At last, the trainreached a border station where some police-men boarded the compartments for checking the suspected packages. During their checking period, the man was fully absorbed in himself with deep thought, and the subject matter of his thought was, when he would find himself as the owner of the trunk --- without the possession of which there would come no rest nor respite to his heart. The police-men after censoring some packages , touched the steel trunk and said in a strong voice, “Whom does this belong?” This question startled the man as he was not ready for the answer. Still; his voice automatically came out to meet the question, “Yes, that’s mine.”
Police-men, “Please open it and show us its contents.” The man replied in a feeble voice, “Sorry, the key has been lost a short time ago.”
Such unexpected reply aroused suspicion in their mind and they compelled him to follow them along with the trunk to their H.QS. When the trunk was opened in presence of some high ranking personnel’s, a horrible sight presented itself, --- the dead-body of a man sliced into several pieces were kept in it. This unexpected and awful sight attacked the man with violent fear, and he rained abundant tears which could not save him from tasting the bitter fruit of punishment, as prescribe by law.
2. One there was an animal with half a dozen mouths, each for securing food from different directions, but the stomach was only one at the centre. One pleasant afternoon, when he was wondering in quest of food, a particular mouth---the first one chanced upon a sweet fruit. “Oh, how fine and delicious it is!” said he to the remaining ones while chewing it and continued, “Never was my tongue contacted with such a sweet thing which beggars all description.”
On his such utterance, the other four mouths congratulated him for his gain; as member of the same family ought to do. But the last one, out of the sway of strong temptation, begged hard for a share of it from the first one thus, “Give me a little bit of it to taste;-- my friend.” The first one smiled and said, “We are too many to share this little thing. Though we look different but are we not all same? What will be our special gain if we taste it separately when the stomach is common? He again repeated his request but when he could not prevail upon the first mouth to comply with his request, he considered himself neglected as well as insulted and said, “Alright, I will teach you a good lesson in time.”
One day, accidentally, the last mouth came across a deadly poisonous fruit, took it close to his mouth and declared his intention of swallowing it, in order to gratify his vengeance against the first mouth. On the strength of this powerful thing, he straightway threatened this rival thus, “Now suffer for your refusal, idiot; I wish I had pull your tongue out which had alone enjoyed that sweet fruit. I must kill you at, “Once by having this fruit.”
His such terrible utterance greatly alarmed the remaining mouths who persuaded him to excuse his rival for the safety of them all. But their joint appeal produced no effect; because his sense of revenge was more than his sense of forgiveness and he wanted to recover his lost prestige by the most vigorous measure of revenge. Thus he turned a deaf ear to their entreaties and put the fruit down to his throat. As a result, instantaneous death put an end to their unhappy career and the animal became a tale of old.
Kazipet WAG-7 duo hauled coal rake was spotted overtaking Kazipet WDG-3A duo hauled coal rake through loop line as main line was blocked by diesels.
Location : Shankarpalli, SC-Wadi section, Rangareddi, AP
in the estrogen-rich environment of a baby shower, a expectant husband is a tempting target for hormonal humor. Daddy-to-be Ian (my former assignment editor, now an oncology nurse) was a good sport, modeling a papoose parka (or something). It seemed as if someone had pulled the drapes off the curtain rod, but I was diplomatic enough to keep my mouth shut. Once the pecking starts, the wise old rooster crows not. Foghorn Leghorn-isms
A bet between me and my friend Andrew concluded with humiliating results for the loser. The wager was such that the loser would spend a half hour in a dunking booth at a local street fair. As it turned out, Andrew was the poor sap on the losing side of that bet and of course I was there with a camera documenting the results for all to see and enjoy!
4/1 Pops surprised everyone when he completely humiliated nightmare by dominating him from start to 4 minute finish. He could have won several times after the 1 minute mark but chose to punish nightmare for his cocky attitude before the match
4/2 unexpectdly cap was decimated by the power and speed of pops who established that he likes to drag matches out long after he has defeated his opponent by foregoing pins and just beating his opponent cap silly
4/3 bw's wionning streak came to a screeching halt when he was destroyed by the aggressive pops. he was taken out of the ring unconscious after he sufferred for 5 minutes when he was obviously beaten after only 2
4/4 pops gave the biker a lesson in pain and respect when he defeated teh arrogant tough quite easily and then beat him bloody before scoring a 1 fingered pin on the pre-match trash talker
4/5 with clinical prescision bb was taken apart body part by body part when he was destroyed by pops
4/6 pops showed that he too had impressive boxing skills when he knocked out trucker and scored the victory
4/champ in a site never before seen pops dominated teh champion. davids power and experience never came into play as the ferocious pops took charge right away and never relinquished it. he pulled david up from a sure 3 count 7 times before he finally used david's own signature torture rack to force the champion to submit.
throughout their 5 minute match david never made any offensive moves beyond the first minute. he was helpless against the monster who enjoyed humiliating him and making him look like a jobber.
after the match david said that he would definitely learn from the defeat and be better the next time they fought
5/1 the new champ took a by in this his first round as champ
5/2 matz was destroyed by the aggressive pops
5/3 pops was given a by week in this round
5/4 in a deliberately humiliating match pops desrtoyed angel and pinned him using only one finger
5/5 matt was easily put away by the ferocious pops. after the match pops said that he couldnt wait to fight david again
5/champ for the first minute this match looked like it would be a vewry close contest. however when pops connected with a right cross to david's jaw the former champion never recovered. Pops beat him relentlessly and over and over yelled at the prostrate david YOU WERE SUPOSED TO LEARN FROM OUR LAST MATCH AND GIVE ME A BETTER FIGHT
he even seemed angry that he was controlling david so easily and that came out in the viscious beating he gave to david.
David left the ring covered in blood and unconscious after pops finally put a foot on davids heaving chest and allowed the ref to count to 3. He shook his head in disappointment the whole time.
6/1 even though he fought them both at the same time pops still scored an almost effortless victory over both matz and beast. He powerslammed beast onto a disabled matz and then pinned both of them at the same time in only 3 minutes 12 seconds
6/2 even though he faced them at the same time pops easily did away with both benji and buff. he pinned buff by sitting on his chest while he put benji in a sleeper hold
6/3 trip made a surprisingly poor showing of himself when he was completely dominated by pops
6/4 once again pops humiliated angel
6/5 pops continued his winning ways by defeating scott milne quite easily. afterwards he did say that he hoped scott trained harder cause he might actually give him a challenge one day
6/champ: for the 1st time ever pops had a very tough match with david. Noone had ever been even a challenge to pops. Every match he dominated from the start and never was in a position where it even looked like he was on the defensive.
David showed that he had learned alot from his previous beatings at pops' hands. for the 1st time in all the times he had faced pops he actually put up an offensive and pops definitely was on the defensive alot.
However despite making a better showing for himself david still lost this match to pops. However after he submitted to pops both men got up and shook hands.
Pops looked ecstatic after the match and told reporters. I cant wait to see how much better he is the next time we fight. That was awesome and I want more.
7/1 bw was quiclky dispatched by pops in this 3 way match. Popps knocked him out at 35 seconds then got bic to submit at 1 minute 35 seconds
7/2 doub lost to pops
7/3 pops easily defeated p5
7/4 in a shocking match alan used a foreign object and knocked pops out. since the ref didnt see it he made it so that alan was the 1st man to ever pin pops
38/1 pops lost to erisca
39/1 popslost to zilla
40/1 jeff10 pinned pops once again
41/1 ratty lost to pops
41/2 ardch pinned pops
2016/03/05(sat)
MALAYSIAS MILITARY DEATH METAL
HUMILIATION JAPAN INVASION 2016 OSAKA
at SOCORE FACTORY
HUMILIATION
DISTURD
SEX MESSIAH
SECOND TO NONE
I would humiliate myself publicly if I showed the original, very worn out bathrobe that almost ended in the rag bag. Suffice it to say that the fuzzy knit had pilled or worn smooth. But it was such a comfortable piece of clothing so I covered it in blue and green patches, then I stitched into it further by machine.
shame | sh ām |
noun
a painful feeling of humiliation or distress caused by the consciousness of wrong or foolish behavior : she was hot with shame | he felt a pang of shame at telling Alice a lie.
• a loss of respect or esteem; dishonor : the incident had brought shame on his family.
• used to reprove someone for something of which they should be ashamed : shame on you for hitting a woman | for shame, brother!
• [in sing. ] a regrettable or unfortunate situation or action : it is a shame that they are not better known.
• a person, action, or situation that brings a loss of respect or honor : ignorance of Latin would be a disgrace and a shame to any public man.
Note: Photos are not mine!
Original poster design was from despair.com/
I just made them Bike related
. . . this are handprints of women who committed sati on their husbands funeral pyre
_________________________________________
Sati was a social funeral practice among some Indian communities in which a recently widowed woman would immolate herself on her husband’s funeral pyre. The practice was banned several times, with the current ban dating to 1829 by the British.
The term is derived from the original name of the goddess Sati, also known as Dakshayani, who self-immolated because she was unable to bear her father Daksha's humiliation of her husband Shiva. The term may also be used to refer to the widow. The term sati is now sometimes interpreted as "chaste woman". Sati appears in both Hindi and Sanskrit texts, where it is synonymous with "good wife"; the term suttee was commonly used by Anglo-Indian English writers.
ORIGN
Few reliable records exist of the practice before the time of the Gupta empire, approximately 400 CE. After about this time, instances of sati began to be marked by inscribed memorial stones. The earliest of these are found in Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, though the largest collections date from several centuries later, and are found in Rajasthan. These stones, called devli, or sati-stones, became shrines to the dead woman, who was treated as an object of reverence and worship. They are most common in western India. A description of suttee appears in a Greek account of the Punjab written in the first century BCE by historian Diodorus Siculus. Brahmins were forbidden from the practice by the Padma Purana. A chapter dated to around the 10th century indicates that, while considered a noble act when committed by a Kshatriya woman, anyone caught assisting an upper-caste Brahmin in self-immolation as a "sati" was guilty of Brahminicide.
The ritual has prehistoric roots, and many parallels from other cultures are known. Compare for example the ship burial of the Rus' described by Ibn Fadlan, where a female slave is burned with her master.
Aristobulus of Cassandreia, a Greek historian who traveled to India with the expedition of Alexander the Great, recorded the practice of sati at the city of Taxila. A later instance of voluntary co-cremation appears in an account of an Indian soldier in the army of Eumenes of Cardia, whose two wives jumped on his funeral pyre, in 316 BC. The Greeks believed that the practice had been instituted to discourage wives from poisoning their old husbands.
Voluntary death at funerals has been described in northern India before the Gupta empire. The original practices were called anumarana, and were uncommon. Anumarana was not comparable to later understandings of sati, since the practices were not restricted to widows – rather, anyone, male or female, with personal loyalty to the deceased could commit suicide at a loved one's funeral. These included the deceased's relatives, servants, followers, or friends. Sometimes these deaths stemmed from vows of loyalty, and bear a slight resemblance to the later tradition of junshi in Japan.
It is theorized that sati, enforced widowhood, and girl marriage were customs that were primarily intended to solve the problem of surplus women and surplus men in a caste and to maintain its endogamy.
Apart from the Indian subcontinent, origins of this practice have been found in many parts of the world; it was followed by the ancient Egyptians, Thracians, Scythians, Scandinavians, Chinese, as well as people of Oceania and Africa.
Sati remained legal in some princely states for a time after it had been abolished in lands under British control. Jaipur banned the practice in 1846. Nepal continued to practice Sati well into the 20th century.
On the Indonesian island of Bali, sati (known as masatya) was practised by the aristocracy as late as 1905, until Dutch colonial rule pushed for its termination.
Following outcries after each instance, the government has passed new measures against the practice, which now effectively make it illegal to be a bystander at an event of sati. The law now makes no distinction between passive observers to the act and active promoters of the event; all are supposed to be held equally guilty. Other measures include efforts to stop the 'glorification' of the dead women. Glorification includes the erection of shrines to the dead, the encouragement of pilgrimages to the site of the pyre, and the derivation of any income from such sites and pilgrims.
Another instance of systematic Sati happened in 1973, when Savitri Soni sacrificed her life with her husband in Kotadi village of Sikar District in Rajasthan. Thousands of people witnessed this incident.
Although many have tried to prevent the act of sati by banning it and reinforcing laws against it, it is still being practiced (on rare occasions) in India under coercion or by voluntary burning, as in the case of Charan Shah: a 55 year-old widow of Manshah who burnt herself on the pyre of her husband in the village of Satpura in Uttar Pradesh on 11 November 1999. Her death on the funeral pyre has provoked much controversy, as there have been questions as to whether she willingly performed the Sati or was coerced. Charan Shah had not professed strong feelings to become a Sati to any of her family members, and no one saw her close to the burning body of her husband before she jumped into the fire. The villagers, including her sons, say that she became a Sati of her own accord and that she was not forced into it. They continue to pay their respects to the house of Charan Shah. It has become a shrine for the villagers, as they strongly believe that one who has become a sati is a deity; she is worshipped and endowed with gifts.
NUMBERS
There are no reliable figures for the numbers who died by sati across the country. A local indication of the numbers is given in the records kept by the Bengal Presidency of the British East India Company. The total figure of known occurrences for the period 1813 to 1828 is 8,135; another source gives a comparable number of 7,941 from 1815 to 1828, thus giving an average of about 507 to 567 documented incidents per year in that period. Raja Ram Mohan Roy estimated that there were ten times as many cases of Sati in Bengal compared to the rest of the country. Bentinck, in his 1829 report, states that 420 occurrences took place in one (unspecified) year in the 'Lower Provinces' of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa, and 44 in the 'Upper Provinces' (the upper Gangetic plain).
WIKIPEDIA
I'm pulled into "Chat".
Cop 1>Good evening. Proof of name please.....
Cop2>uhem, ALL of them Ms. Hetic.
I give the man my real name, my monker, my alias. He runs them through his computer for verification. I hear my stats being discussed amongst themselves. It's hard to hear what they are talking about through their laughter.
God, this is humiliating!
They return...
Cop2>O.K. Sorry about the delay. Do any of these names look familiar to you?
I look through a long list of names. I tell the cops that a couple are familiar. I point to a few names of guys I write to. The cops exchange knowing glances, shut their notepads, and say...
Cop2>We hate to be the ones to break the news to you Pat_Hetic, Quasimodem, Monkey Wench, or whatever the hell you are calling yourself tonight, but in our line of work we like to refer to these men as Virtual Stalkers. They cruise the net looking for unsuspecting women, such as yourself to Hood Wink ;-), It really doesn't help that you name yourself Pathetic, it's just the type of woman that is preyed on most often. The good news is that you are driving an old profile, not many approach the older models. They really aren't worth as much out on the net, but...the fact that they are perceived grateful usually tips the balance.
I mention that I am not grateful. Grateful to be alive maybe...but that's about it.
Cop1>There is also the perception that the older models can teach something out there...but the truth is they are too tired usually to move much.
Cop1>Yeah, what part about the word "old" do they not get?
The cops exchange the most horrid of smirky looks. I am starting to get insulted. If I hear the word cougar I'm complaining to their superiors.
Cop2>Why did you think these guys were writing to you anyway?
I told them that my entries were quite thought provoking, rather amusing, fresh!
The cops start to giggle, breaking down into uncontrollable laughter. They laugh so hard that coffee spews from their noses. Tears of laughter run down their faces. When they finally regain their composure they continue...
Cop 1>Lady ....wake up! Have you read any of your own posts? You didn't even suspect anything, not even once? I find that hard to believe. I mean what did you think when you received a few "Jeffrey Dahmer" pics?
With indignance, I asked exactly what he was referring to.
Cop1>Don't you be telling us that you have never received pictures of men with naked torsos, some actually headless. We can check out your message history, so you aren't fooling anyone.
Honestly I thought it might be bad photography. I mean not all of us have access to famed photographer Anne De Haas who can be reached at www.annedehaas.com and I did receive emails from those living in warmer countries. There might be a perfectly good reason why men would be half naked when answering the proverbial email door....
Cop2>Welcome to Club Naive, the club for self-deluding women. I admit you are the oldest one that we've pulled over tonight and we know that most of what has happened is truly because you don't know what you are doing. I mean, don't you know how to lie yet?
The cop shines a flashlight in my face. This is so embarrassing.
Cop1>We just want you to be careful, serve and protect y-know. We are just trying to keep the net safe.
I ask them if there is anything I can to to help.
Cop2>Yes there is. Post this letter everywhere you write to men so other women won't be as naive as you.
I say "Oh yeah, right...then nobody will write to me for fear of being accused unfairly".
What are they actually suggesting; that I take a bath, put on make-up and actually go out? How insane is that?
Cop2>Listen, we don't want to ruin your social life here. We know how the world works. The "real" men will get a kick out of it and take it in the spirit intended.
I think, now WHO here is being naive?
Cop1>Oh yeah, one more thing before you go, We'd like to see some registration for your "Outlook".
Quasimodem