View allAll Photos Tagged Decentralization
Women learning computer skills at the vocational training and rehabilitation Center in Haret Hreik. UNDP supported its establishment in partnership with the Swedish government in 2011 together with the Municipality of Haret Hreik. The primary objective of the training center is to alleviate unemployment and generate better income for the population of Beirut Southern Suburbs, a densely populated region comprising nearly 30% of the entire Lebanese population and confronting major socioeconomic challenges , the most adverse being unemployment and lack of job opportunities.
“Some 1,484 beneficiaries have received training since the centre was opened, of whom the majority are women,” said the center’s director Ali Mustafa. The center holds classes for women in agro-food processing, cooking, IT skills, crafts, and beauty, among other subjects, and there are other courses on electric installations and mobile maintenance that are tailored specifically for men. Each of these sixty-hour courses lasts for nearly three months.
Photo by Adam Rogers /UNDP
Children carrying dried straw on the Baglung-Bartibang road.
Project Result:
Nepal: Decentralized Rural Infrastructure and Livelihood Project (DRILP) - Loan 2092 (2010)
Helping Women and Building Infrastructure in Nepal
Read more on:
Ambulance crossing the bridge in Beni, Myagdi District, Nepal.
Project Result:
Nepal: Decentralized Rural Infrastructure and Livelihood Project (DRILP) - Loan 2092 (2010)
Helping Women and Building Infrastructure in Nepal
Read more on:
Two people working at a palm oil processing facility. This place was right next to the highway, to facilitate the passing buyer.
Photo by Mokhamad Edliadi/CIFOR
If you use one of our photos, please credit it accordingly and let us know. You can reach us through our Flickr account or at: cifor-mediainfo@cgiar.org and m.edliadi@cgiar.org
Porter rests along the trek. Despite abundant water resources, access to water supply remains difficult with Nepal’s mountainous terrain especially for people living in remote rural areas and irrigation on farms can be extremely difficult.
Project Result:
Nepal: Decentralized Rural Infrastructure and Livelihood Project (DRILP) - Loan 2092 (2010)
Helping Women and Building Infrastructure in Nepal
Read more on:
Hellenic Air Force F-16 Demo Team “Zeus” during its flying demonstration in Athens Flying Week 2018.
The Aircraft is an F-16C Blk 52+ from 340 Squadron “Fox”, stationed in 115 Combat Wing in Souda Air Force Base.
Demo Pilot: Major (Air Force) Dimitrios Volakakis.
Locals riding a bus passing by the rural road in Nepal.
Project Result:
Nepal: Decentralized Rural Infrastructure and Livelihood Project (DRILP) - Loan 2092 (2010)
Helping Women and Building Infrastructure in Nepal
Read more on:
Standing Up, Speaking Out: Local Power and Women's Rights
(Jason Taylor, Rajasthan)
It was a policy born of a shining promise-that decentralized governments would help empower tens of millions of women in developing countries. But has shifting more power and resources to the local level really improved women’s lives? Has it resulted in more girls going to school, more pregnant women receiving a doctor’s care, more women owning the land they till, and more women playing their rightful role in all levels of government?
Promoted by many donor organizations, decentralization is intended to make government more effective and accountable by bringing it closer to the people. For women who have been excluded from political decision-making, decentralization theoretically allows them to challenge how resources are allocated in their communities, including services like basic health care, access to water and education.
For more information: www.idrc.ca/en/ev-142655-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html
Défendre ses droits ! Prendre la parole ! Les pouvoirs locaux et les droits des femmes
(Jason Taylor, Rajasthan)
On avait fondé beaucoup d’espoirs dans la décentralisation. En effet, on pensait qu’elle contribuerait à l’autonomisation de dizaines de millions de femmes dans les pays en développement. Mais le transfert de pouvoirs et de ressources à l’échelon local s’est-il réellement traduit par une amélioration de la condition des femmes ? Par un plus grand nombre de fillettes sur les bancs d’école, de femmes enceintes ayant accès à un suivi médical, de femmes possédant les terres qu’elles cultivent, de femmes qui jouent le rôle qui leur revient au sein des divers ordres de gouvernement ?
De nombreux bailleurs de fonds promeuvent la décentralisation, car elle est censée rendre le gouvernement plus efficace et plus responsable en le rapprochant de la population. Les femmes ayant été exclues de la prise de décision politique, la décentralisation devrait en théorie les aider à s’élever contre la façon dont la répartition des ressources se fait dans leur collectivité, notamment en ce qui concerne les besoins fondamentaux que sont l’accès à des services de santé de base, à l’eau et à l’éducation.
Pour plus de renseignements : www.idrc.ca/fr/ev-142655-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html
The Unity Ingot Coin
The World of Finance and Investments is varying into a Decentralized Society
People are looking for extra places to stock their hard-earned grant and go to it through investments as they don't trust the status quo.
Taking a look at the relatively new world of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technologies we look many similarities to that of customary investment platforms such as stocks, bonds, funds, insurance and more
But they are completely different, heres why
Most cryptocurrencies are developed from blockchain technology.
The blockchain is a peer-to-peer database that maintains a list of history called
Blocks. These blocks are similar by cryptography securing the data. The first block chain was conceptualized by Satoshi Nakamoto in 2008 as a key component of the digital currency Bitcoin where it serves as the public ledger for all transactions that individuals complete with Bitcoin
the opening of blockchain for Bitcoin inspired entrepreneurs and tech savvy people all
over the world to design crypto currencies and tokens for additional decentralized applications
we see these pioneering days of using cryptocurrencies and the blockchain technology as a different nice of opportunity.
Ethereum, Bitcoins sudo challenger of sorts which is afterward developed from a blockchain technology did something unique in their progress by creating smart union Technology to be in afterward their blockchain for big concern and developers alike to make more lucrative opportunities in a more swift and modern manner.
Introducing our agreement Ingot Crypto-Token
A chaotic habit they are creating long term returns for people that wish to retain our token.
Built from Ethereums smart concord Technology the agreement Ingot is the first of its kind.
Why is it unique and a first?
Unity is backed by cryptocurrency mining.
50% of the proceeds from the weekly mining pools is used to buy Bitcoin and Gold to back up our token. 15% of the weekly mining proceeds is used to buy more mining servers in view of that the coin always grows in an exponential way. 15% of the daily mining proceeds is used to save the shout out value of our token stable in the quarrel make public places. The last 20% percentage is used for allowance and upkeep of the mining facility.
This means that the pact Token will exponentially build up in value based adjacent to the mining equipment and its buildup of value behind Gold and Bitcoin. rule deal to be similar to a more expected addition of value that relates to a Gold backed ETF.
The unity Ingot will bring online 1x mining server for every 5 million tokens innate adopted by their followers. later all tokens are adopted, the pact Ingot will have the base power of 2000 mining servers dynamic at a hash rate of 230mhs per server or 460gh in sum returning $880,000 per month after electricity costs at current announce prices the morning I am writing this article. The ROI of each server at todays prices is isolated 340 days opposed to mining Bitcoin itself as soon as the summit mining equipment for the Bitcoin blockchain which returns an ROI in 14 15 months at current prices and mysteriousness of the BTC blockchain. The agreement mining operation can mine oscillate cryptocurrencies such as Ethereum, ZCash, Lite Coin and thus many more which makes it much more diversified and appealing.
The treaty Ingot team focus their mining farms at the cryptocurrency that is offering the highest returns that day, hours of daylight in and morning out. past such an operation, ahead of time adopters of the agreement Ingot can expect a 100%+ growth factor year on top of year and thats just if Gold and Bitcoin stay at their current value, but it doesnt stop there.
Remember it was mentioned that 15% of the mining proceeds is reinvested into more mining servers? without difficulty this creates exponential buildup to the mining capabilities as capably as building vanguard bullion reserves against our token on a daily basis. One could look at this as roughly the strongest compound amalgamation model that the broadminded world has ever seen perfect its addition potential year exceeding year. The creators did this so if the cryptocurrency markets ever collapsed, people holding the unity Ingot could allegation their tokens against the reserves, appropriately acting once an insurance policy.
The agreement Ingot is just one of 9 unique tokens instinctive created and launched into the cryptocurrency tone by this build up team to fill the gulf of the different bullion backed tokens as a safe port of sorts. The creators acknowledge that this a need in the ever-evolving cryptocurrency recess that the world is currently opening happening too.
A see into the Recent endeavors Surrounding Bitcoin
Within the bearing in mind six months from the epoch I write this article we have seen countries such as the Philippines and Japan legalize Bitcoin as a genuine currency in their countries. Countries such as India, Russia, China and the EU are moreover looking at proceed the same. It has been released recently that Russia and China are dumping the U.S. dollar for gold and looking to harsh themselves from the central banks. considering this in mind, adopting Bitcoin into their unconventional plans would be a natural business to realize even if diversifying their investments to enlarge on their own currencies and secure guarding themselves from a potential banking collapse from the centralized system and the petro-dollar.
This can already be seen in Japan where they are now holding 41.8% of every Bitcoin and have released a projected estimate that 260,000 businesses will be compliant BTC as a form of payment in their country. Our predictions are that the cryptocurrency flavor will become the next-door financial encounter zone where countries in this area the world will every legalize crypto as qualified currency and will be credited with large reserves as a drop support to the fiat dollar exceeding the next two years.
Many of the elite in the similar to year have predicted that Bitcoin will surpass $10,000 per coin by 2020 and surpass $50,000 by 2030 because of the limited supply. Some people such as Jeremy Liew, the first Snap chat traveler and Peter Smith the CEO of Blockchain both say that Bitcoin will be worth greater than $500,000 by 2030 for this revise similar reason. It has as well as been said in recent months that if the Winklevoss ETF was to be accepted by the associated States SEC that Bitcoins value would have risen to $5000 per coin higher than night. The ETF was denied in March followed by 3 further Bitcoin ETF attempts in the same way as that judgement. The SEC is revisiting the substitute to legalize the Winklevoss ETF and has allowed open a breath of fresh air from the U.S. public in helpful their feedback. The similar recognition could be said that if Russia, India, China or the EU legalizes Bitcoin as official tender, the price per digital coin could look prices well along than $10,000.
This is the veracity we living in and people from every roughly the world are starting to realize that an investment in Bitcoin is a good opportunity. However, buying Bitcoin is expensive and there is an easier artifice to get a turn in this emerging trend. By acquiring a small tilt in the concurrence Ingot which is acknowledged to explode due to the fact that it is one of the abandoned difficult asset backed cryptocurrencies in the world, those holdings could twist into a greater recompense on investment and similar to the dust settles upon the given price for the tokens is received by the entry spread around place a person could easily trade help for Bitcoin or withhold onto the Untiy Ingot for the long term and reap the advance for a far away less purchase in cost. all in all, the cryptocurrency trend seems afterward it is here to stay and the opportunities are bountiful at the current time. Invest wisely, accomplish your own due diligence and acknowledge every precaution to secure guard your hard-earned money.
Local jeep carrying passengers in Nepal.
Project Result:
Nepal: Decentralized Rural Infrastructure and Livelihood Project (DRILP) - Loan 2092 (2010)
Helping Women and Building Infrastructure in Nepal
Read more on:
Tractor on the Kusum Sera road in Nepal.
Project Result:
Nepal: Decentralized Rural Infrastructure and Livelihood Project (DRILP) - Loan 2092 (2010)
Helping Women and Building Infrastructure in Nepal
Read more on:
A smallholder processing palm oil in the Southwest region of Cameroon.
Photo by Mokhamad Edliadi/CIFOR
If you use one of our photos, please credit it accordingly and let us know. You can reach us through our Flickr account or at: cifor-mediainfo@cgiar.org and m.edliadi@cgiar.org
a couple thousand people showed up at civic center in downtown san francisco friday night, and these guys Tom and Gary from canada (who are on a global mission to one day have a global dance party) brought an FM transmitter, 50 or so boom boxes, and broadcasted music to the boomboxes which were all tuned to 87.5. madness ensued as we took over downtown SF. the cops shut it down after 400 noise complaints. it was fucking awesome and I pray Tom and Gary decide to return to san fran for another epic party
From 1954 until 1974, many American cities were ringed by a decentralized network of guided missiles intended to destroy incoming enemy aircraft and ICBMs. Named for the Greek goddess of victory, Nike missiles were equipped with either high explosive or "small" nuclear warheads (with up to a 40 kiloton yield). At the peak of the program there were over 200 Nike "batteries" in the Continental US (plus over a hundred more protecting strategic locations outside the US). Advances in ICBM technology, coupled with the ABM treaty, eventually put an end to the domestic Nike program, with most of the sites de-commissioned and quickly consumed by suburban sprawl. A few sites have been preserved, however, and I recently visited "SF88L" in Ft. Barry, just across the Golden Gate Bridge from San Francisco in the Marin headlands.
SF88L is now under the control of the National Park Service (so don't mess with them), and, thanks to a team of volunteers (many of whom are Nike veterans), is open for guided tours for a few hours each month (as of this writing, the first Sunday of the month, 12:30-3:30pm, but check the web sites below before heading out). See www.nikemissile.net/, www.nikemissile.org/, ed-thelen.org/, and www.atomictourist.com/nike.htm for details on the site and the history of the Nike program generally. Considering its proximity to San Francisco the area is surprisingly remote and rural. (To get there from the highway you go through a neat little single lane tunnel that alternates direction every five minutes.)
The site is a must-see for the Bay-area hacker tourist -- a visit richly repays the advance planning needed to accomodate its somewhat out-of-the-way location and limited schedule. It is remarkably well-preserved, with at least four full, JATO-equipped Nike missiles (un-fueled and sans warheads, we're repeatedly assured), two underground "magazines" with launch platforms, launch and radar control trailers, a radar station (originally a few miles away, line of site), and display cases with assorted artifacts.
See www.crypto.com/photos/misc/sf88l/ for more.
04 June 2020 Rome Italy - Second Virtual Town Hall meeting: Dialogue with employees in Decentralized Offices.
Businesses along the Baglung-Bartibang road has benefited from the increased traffic.
Project Result:
Nepal: Decentralized Rural Infrastructure and Livelihood Project (DRILP) - Loan 2092 (2010)
Helping Women and Building Infrastructure in Nepal
Read more on:
Badri Bahadur KC sells conveniences to a hillside community of more than 500 people. The Baglung-Bartibang road has improved his business.
Project Result:
Nepal: Decentralized Rural Infrastructure and Livelihood Project (DRILP) - Loan 2092 (2010)
Helping Women and Building Infrastructure in Nepal
Read more on:
A 3D mapping on the monument to Princess Olga in Kyiv, which marked the beginning of the HeForShe Arts Week 2021. The key image of the installation is the stars, which symbolize the inner flame of all artistic leaders.
For the fourth time, Ukraine hosted the HeForShe Arts Week – an art marathon that brings together museums, galleries, cinemas and other creative institutions around the themes of gender equality and human rights. Women's leadership and outstanding Ukrainian women artists became the focus of the HeForShe Arts Week 2021, and the slogan was: Inner fire to inspire.
Photo: UN Women Ukraine
Read more: unwo.men/WaJ350EG2Vp
Villiage chief Ngontsimi Onana. Minwoho, Lekié, Centre Region, Cameroon.
Photo by Ollivier Girard/CIFOR
If you use one of our photos, please credit it accordingly and let us know. You can reach us through our Flickr account or at: cifor-mediainfo@cgiar.org and m.edliadi@cgiar.org
Aerial view of growing oil palm plantation in near Douala, Cameroon.
Photo by Mokhamad Edliadi/CIFOR
If you use one of our photos, please credit it accordingly and let us know. You can reach us through our Flickr account or at: cifor-mediainfo@cgiar.org and m.edliadi@cgiar.org
Santorini is one of the Cyclades islands in the Aegean Sea. It was devastated by a volcanic eruption in the 16th century BC, forever shaping its rugged landscape. The whitewashed, cubiform houses of its 2 principal towns, Fira and Oia, cling to cliffs above an underwater caldera (crater). They overlook the sea, small islands to the west and beaches made up of black, red and white lava pebbles.
Akrotiri, a Bronze Age settlement preserved under ash from the eruption, provides a frozen-in-time glimpse into Minoan life. The ruins of Ancient Thera lie on a dramatic bluff that drops to the sea on 3 sides. Fira, the island's commercial heart, has the Archaeological Museum of Thera and boutique shops. It also has a lively bar scene and tavernas serving local grilled seafood and dry white wine, made from the Assyrtiko grape. Oia is famous for sunsets over its old fortress [Santorini Google Travel]
Construction machines smooth the way for the ADB-supported Baglung-Bartibang road.
Project Result:
Nepal: Decentralized Rural Infrastructure and Livelihood Project (DRILP) - Loan 2092 (2010)
Helping Women and Building Infrastructure in Nepal
Read more on:
Photo by Icaro Cooke Vieira/CIFOR
If you use one of our photos, please credit it accordingly and let us know. You can reach us through our Flickr account or at: cifor-mediainfo@cgiar.org and m.edliadi@cgiar.org
Aerial view of growing oil palm plantation in near Douala, Cameroon.
Photo by Mokhamad Edliadi/CIFOR
If you use one of our photos, please credit it accordingly and let us know. You can reach us through our Flickr account or at: cifor-mediainfo@cgiar.org and m.edliadi@cgiar.org
Union Square, NYC
by navema
On Saturday April 3rd 2010, massive pillow fights occurred in cities around the world!
The project, Pillow Fight Day 2010, is a collaboration of many people who comprise a loose, decentralized network of urban playground event organizers all over the world.
ABOUT NEWMINDSPACE
All over the world, groups like Newmindspace organize free, fun, all ages, non-commercial public events. From a massive Mobile Clubbing event in a London train station to a giant pillow fight near the Eiffel Tower in Paris to a subway party beneath the streets of Toronto, it is clear that the urban playground is growing around the world, leaving more public and more social cities in its wake. This is the urban playground movement, a playful part of the larger public space movement.
One of the goals at Newmindspace is to make these unique happenings in public space become a significant part of popular culture, partially replacing passive, non-social, branded consumption experiences like watching television. The result will be a global community of participants in a world where people are constantly organizing and attending these happenings in every major city in the world.
Other projects include:
*BLANKET FORTS: fortresses made of blankets and pillows. A labyrinthine complex of themed, soft forts installed inside a 2000 square-foot private loft. Midnight snacks, smoothies, and hot cocoa are offered. Teddy bears, pajamas and bath robes welcome. It is meant to be an intimate evening among friends and friends of friends, as well as a fundraiser for their free, outdoor public events.
*WE<3 NY: on February 14th, volunteers painted thousands of hearts on the sidewalks of SoHo.
*SANTACON: is a not-for-profit, non-political, non-religious & non-logical Santa Claus convention, attended for absolutely no reason. Check out the website: nycsantacon.com/
*PHOTOGRAPH: people photographing people photographing people and then uploaded to Flickr.
*CAPTURE THE FLAG!: a massive, adrenaline-pumping, urban game played on the streets of downtown Toronto. Two teams hide flags in their territory and attempt to capture the enemy flag using subways, streetcars, bicycles, longboards or their own two feet.
*MARSHMELLOW CIVIL WAR: a historical reenactment in New York of questionable accuracy. With marshmallows.
*BUBBLE BATTLE: thousands of people converge in Times Square for a bubble battle. Loosely based on the Dr. Seuss Classic The Butter Battle Book.
*LIGHTSABER BATTLE: 3,000 blacklight-reactive, meter-long cardboard tubes are distributed in Washington Square Park, and massive blacklight cannons are aimed at the crowd...the battle continues until every tube is destroyed.
*BIG WHEEL RACE: racing down the Great Hill in Central Park on big wheels, trikes, skateboards, velocipedes, or handmade contraptions on wheels, along with superhero costumes.
*JINGLE BELL ROCK: people bring their personal music players with their favorite tunes and a gift to exchange, and everyone rocks out.
For more info visit: www.newmindspace.com/index.php
from ift.tt/2HPpeyK
Under the right circumstances, groups are remarkably intelligent, and are often smarter than the smartest people in them. Groups do not need to be dominated by exceptionally intelligent people in order to be smart. Even if most of the people within a group are not especially well-informed or rational, it can still reach a collectively wise decision.
When our imperfect judgments are aggregated in the right way, our collective intelligence is often excellent.
We assume that the key to solving problems or making good decisions is finding that one right person who will have the answer. The argument of this book is that chasing the expert is a mistake, and a costly one at that. We should stop hunting and ask the crowd instead. Chances are, it knows. (Crowd includes the geniuses as well as everyone else.)
The best way for a group to be smart is for each person in it to think and act as independently as possible.
Chapter 1
In general, the bigger the crowd the better.
If you run 10 different jelly-bean-counting experiments, it’s likely that each time one or two students will outperform the group. But they will not be the same students each time. Over 10 experiments, the group’s performance will almost certainly be the best possible. The simplest way to get reliably good answers is just to ask the group each time.
The 4 conditions that characterize wise crowds:
1. Diversity of opinion
2. Independence
3. Decentralization
4. Aggregation
If you ask 100 people to run a 100-meter race, the average time will not be better than the time of the fastest runners. It will be worse – a mediocre time. But ask 100 people to answer a question or solve a problem, and the average number will often be as least as good as the answer of the smartest member. With most things, the average is mediocrity. With decision making, it’s often excellence.
Chapter 2
(About product innovation or small companies:) What makes a system successful is its ability to generate lots of losers and then to recognize them as such and kill them off. Sometimes the messiest approach is the wisest.
Generating a diverse set of possible solutions isn’t enough. The crowd also has to be able to distinguish the good solutions from the bad.
The simple fact of making a group diverse makes it better at problem solving.
Grouping only smart people together doesn’t work that well, because the smart people tend to resemble each other in what they can do. The group knows less than it otherwise might. Adding in a few people who know less, but have different skills, actually improves the group’s performance.
Groups that are too much alike find it harder to keep learning, because each member is bringing less and less to the table. They spend too much time exploiting, and not enough time exploring.
The fact that cognitive diversity matters does not mean that if you assemble a group of diverse but thoroughly uninformed people, their collective wisdom will be smarter than an expert’s. But if you can assemble a diverse group of people who possess varying degrees of knowledge and insight, you’re better off entrusting it with major decisions rather than leaving them in the hands of one or two people, no matter how smart those people are.
A large group of diverse individuals will come up with better and more robust forecasts and make more intelligent decisions than even the most skilled “decision maker”.
Seer-sucker theory : No matter how much evidence exists that seers do not exist, suckers will pay for the existence of seers.
If a group is so unintelligent that it will flounder without the right expert, it’s not clear why the group would be intelligent enough to recognize an expert when it found him.
[When one person realizes they are clearly a non-conformer in a group of conformers, they tend to conform. But…] having even one other person in the group who felt as they did made the subjects happy to announce their thoughts and the rate of conformity plummeted.
Chapter 3
The smartest groups are made up of people with diverse perspectives who are able to stay independent of each other.
You can be biased and irrational, but as long as you’re independent, you won’t make the group any dumber.
The more influence a group’s members exert on each other, and the more personal contact they have with each other, the less likely it is that the group’s decisions will be wise ones. We could become individually smarter but collectively dumber.
“Social proof” : the tendency to assume that if lots of people are doing something or believe something, there must be a good reason why.
That’s why the crowd becomes more influential as it becomes bigger : every additional person is proof that something important is happening.
Following the group is a reasonable strategy, but if too many people adopt that strategy, it stops being sensible and the group stops being smart.
(Fads/Crazes:) Everyone thinks that people are making decisions based on what they know, when in fact people are making decisions based on what they think the people who came before them knew. Instead of aggregating all the information individuals have, the cascade becomes a sequence of uninformed choices, so that collectively the group ends up making a bad decision.
People are, in general, overconfident. They overestimate their ability, level of knowledge, and decision-making prowess. More overconfident when facing big problems than easy ones.
The more important a decision, the less likely a cascade (fad/craze) is to take hold. The more important the decision, the more likely it is that the groups’ collective verdict will be right.
Encouraging people to make incorrect guesses actually made the group as a whole smarter.
One key to successful group decisions is getting people to pay much less attention to what everyone else is saying.
Chapter 4
Decentralization : power does not fully reside in one central location, and many of the important decisions are made by individuals based on their own local and specific knowledge rather than by an omniscient or farseeing planner.
It fosters and is fed by specialization.
The closer a person is to a problem, the more likely he or she is to have a good solution to it.
Decentralization’s great weakness is that there’s no guarantee that valuable information which is uncovered in one part of the system will find its way through the rest of the system. Sometimes valuable information never gets disseminated.
A decentralized system can only produce genuinely intelligent results if there’s a means of aggregating the information of everyone in the system.
Chapter 5
Convention explains why:
– companies rarely cut wages in a recession (it violates workers’ expectations and hurts moral), preferring instead to lay people off
– every major car company releases its new models in September, (even though there would be less competition if each company released its cars in different months)
– clothing retailers apply a simple 50% markup, then discount like mad if the items don’t sell
– it costs you as much to see a “total limping dog” movie in its last week of release as it does a hugely popular film on opening night
About organization and coordination:
Next time you go to the supermarket looking for orange juice, it’ll be there waiting, even though you didn’t tell the grocer you were coming. There will be as much orange juice in the freezer as the store’s customers want over the next few days, even though none of them told the grocer they were coming. The juice you buy will have been packaged days earlier, after it was made from oranges picked weeks earlier, by people who don’t even know you exist. The players in that chain – shopper, grocer, wholesaler, packager, grower – are not acting on formal rules, but they are using local knowledge and making decisions not on the basis of what’s good for everyone, but rather on the basis of what’s good for themselves. And yet, without anyone leading them or directing them, people are able to coordinate their economic activities.
In the 50 years since Vernon Smith did his first experiment in [wisdom of crowds] and published the results, they have been replicated thousands of times in ever more complex variations. But the essential conclusion of those early tests has not been challenged : that, under the right conditions, imperfect humans can produce near-perfect results.
Chapter 6
To solve cooperation problems – like keeping the sidewalk free of snow, paying taxes, and curbing pollution – the members of a society need to do more. They need to adopt a broader definition of self-interest than the myopic one that maximizing profits in the short-term demands. And they need to trust those around them, because in the absence of trust the pursuit of myopic self-interest is the only strategy that makes sense.
“Ultimatum game” : behavioral economics : 2 people given $10 to divide between them. One person decides what the split should be, then makes take-it-or-leave-it offer to the other person. That person can either accept the offer, in which case both players pocket their respective shares of the cash, or reject it, in which case both players walk away empty-handed. If both players are purely rational, the proposer will keep $9 and offer $1, and the responder will take it, since if he accepts he gets $1, and rejects gets none. In practice, though, this rarely happens. Instead, low-ball offers, anything below $2, are routinely rejected. Think about what this means : people would rather have nothing than let the other person walk away with too much of the loot. They will give up free money to punish what they perceive as greedy or selfish behavior.
People think, in an ideal world, everyone would end up with the amount of money they deserved.
An interesting version of the Ultimatum game, instead of assigning the proposer role randomly, the researchers made it seem as if the proposers had earned their positions by doing better on a test. In those experiments, the proposers offered significantly less money, yet not a single offer was rejected. People apparently thought that a proposer who merited his position deserved to keep more of the wealth.
In America, the people whom inequality bothers most are the rich. Americans are far more likely to believe that wealth is the result of initiative and skill, while Europeans are more likely to attribute it to luck.
The foundation of cooperation is not really trust, but the durability of the relationship. Whether the players trust each other or not is less important in the long run than whether the conditions are ripe for them to build a stable pattern of cooperation with each other.
Successful cooperation requires that people start off by being nice, willing to cooperate, but have to be willing to punish non-cooperative behavior as soon as it appears. The best approach is to be “nice, forgiving, and retaliatory”.
We have learned that trade and exchange are games in which everyone can end up gaining.
The benefits of being trusting and of being trustworthy are potentially immense, because a successful market system teaches people to recognize those benefits.
Merchant guilds – most notably the German Hanseatic League – protected their members against the unfair treatment from city-states by imposing collective trade embargoes against cities that seized merchant property.
Previously, trust had been the product primarily of a personal or in-group relationship. Modern capitalism made the idea of trusting people with whom you had no personal ties seem reasonable, if only by demonstrating that strangers would not, as a matter of course, betray you. Buying and selling no longer required a personal connection. It’s driven instead by the benefits of mutual exchange.
I can walk into a store somewhere far from home and buy an item that was made across the world, and it will probably work well. This is true even though I may never walk in that store again. We take the reliability of the store and manufacturer for granted. But in fact, they’re remarkable achievements.
Capitalism is healthiest when people believe the long-term benefits of fair dealing outweigh the short-term benefits of sharp dealing.
Collective action like political rallies : for the individual it would make more sense to let someone else do the work. Everyone has an incentive to sit on their hands, wait for someone else to do something, and free ride. Since everyone wants to be a free-rider, nothing gets done. ((But since people do get involved, like paying taxes for example, it shows that other emotions are at work.))
Part 2 : EXAMPLES
(Scientists:) The quest for recognition ensures a steady infusion of diverse thought, since no one becomes famous for restating what’s already known.
If you talk a lot in a group, people will tend to think of you as influential almost by default. Talkative people are not necessarily well liked, but they are listened to.
Group decisions are not inherently inefficient. This suggests that deliberation can be valuable when done well, even if after a certain point its marginal benefits are outweighed by the costs.
There is no point in making small groups part of a leadership structure if you do not give the group a method of aggregating the opinions of its members. If small groups are included in the decision-making process, then they should be allowed to make decisions. If an organization sets up teams and then uses them for purely advisory purposes, it loses the true advantage that a team has : namely, collective wisdom.
Chapter 10 : The Company
You do not need consensus in order to tap into the wisdom of a crowd. The search for consensus encourages tepid lowest-common-denominator solutions which offend no one rather than exciting everyone.
Even those companies that tried to make the decision-making process more democratic thought democracy meant endless discussion rather than a wider distribution of decision-making power.
Attempting to run an entire company by command and control is a futile task. It’s too costly in terms of time and requires far too much information that top executives should not be bothering with.
What gets in the way of the exchange of real information is a deep-rooted hostility on the part of the bosses to opposition from subordinates. This is the real cost of top-down approach to decision making : it confers the illusion of perfectibility upon the decision makers and encourages everyone else simply to play along.
Companies tend to pay people based on whether they do what they’re expected to do. In a market, people get paid simply on what they do! Ideally, the same would be true inside a company.
This is an essential part of what markets do : encourage people to find new valuable information and then let everyone else know about it. This too is what corporations should be looking for : ways to provide their employees with the incentive to uncover and act on private information.
Even small option grants seem to instill a sense of ownership, and we know that owners are, in general, more likely to take good care of their property than renters are.
Far more important than stock options would be the elimination of rigid managerial hierarchies and the wider distribution of real decision-making power.
The more responsibility people have for their own environments the more engaged they will be.
Allowing people to make decisions about their own working conditions makes a material difference in how they perform.
Decentralized markets work exceptionally well because the people and companies in those markets are getting constant feedback from customers. Companies that aren’t doing a good job or are spending too much learn to adjust or else they go out of business.
Some academics suggest that CEOs have, at best, a minor impact on corporate performance.
The more power you give a single individual in the face of complexity and uncertainty, the more likely it is that bad decisions will get made.
Use methods of aggregating collective wisdom.
The anonymity of the markets and the fact that they yield a relatively clear solution, while giving individuals an unmistakable incentive to uncover and act on good information, means that their potential value is genuinely hard to overestimate.
The more important the decision, the more important it is that it not be left in the hands of a single person.
Chapter 11 : Stock Market
The measure of the stock market’s success is not whether stock prices are rising. It’s whether stock prices are right. It’s harder for the market to get prices right when there is so little money on the short side.
The psychology of investors:
– sometimes herd, preferring the safety of the company of others to make independent decisions.
– too much credence to recent and high-profile news while underestimating the longer-lasting trends or less dramatic events
– (in the same way people worry about being killed in a plane crash while not paying attention to their high cholesterol)
– fooled by randomness, believing money managers who have had a few good quarters have figured out the trick of beating the market
– find losses twice as painful as they find gains pleasurable, so hold on to stocks longer than they should, believing as long as they haven’t sold it, they haven’t suffered any losses
– above all, overconfident, which means they trade more than they should and end up costing themselves money as a result
– (from 1991-1996 the market returned 17.9%. active investors earned just 11.4%. They would have done better had they just sat on their hands.)
Individual irrationality can add up to collective rationality.
People want to save, and do not need a massive push to do so. What they do need is a way to make saving easier and spending harder. One way of doing this is to make enrollment in retirement plans automatic, rather than asking people to sign up for them. If people have to take action to opt out of a retirement plan rather than having to take action to opt in, they are significantly more likely to stay in the plan and more likely to save. Inertia is a powerful tool.
The idea of the wisdom of crowds is not that a group will always give you the right answer, but that on average it will consistently come up with a better answer than any individual could provide. That’s why the fact that only a fraction of investors consistently do better than the market remains the most powerful piece of evidence that the market is efficient.
The healthiest markets are those that are animated by both fear and greed at the same time. Any time you sell a stock, the person who’s buying it thinks differently about the future prospects of that stock. You think it’s going down, he thinks it’s going up. One of you will be right, but the important thing is that it’s only through the interaction of those differing attitudes that the market is able to do a good job of allocating capital.
In a bubble, all of the conditions that make groups intelligent – independence, diversity, private judgement – disappear.
The price of TVs doesn’t suddenly double overnight only to crash a few months later. You never end up with a situation where the fact that prices are rising makes people more interested in buying (which is what happens in a bubble). The more expensive a TV gets, the less interested people are in buying it.
(bubbles:) The kind of diversity of opinion that a healthy market depends on was replaced by a sort of single-mindedness.
Everyone was convinced the greater fool was out there.
If groups on the whole are relatively intelligent (as we know they are), there’s a good chance that a stock price is actually right. Problem is that once everyone starts piggybacking on the wisdom of the group, then no one is doing anything to add to the wisdom of the group.
News reporters tend to overplay the importance of any particular piece of information. The best way to disclose public information is without hype or commentary from people in the positions of power. (Like the way the Federal Reserve announces its interest-rate hikes.)
A mob in the middle of a riot appears to be a single organism, acting with one mind.
Chapter 12 : Government
Government kept getting bigger, since everyone had an individual interest in getting a little more from the state, and no one was looking out for the collective interest, entered into cozy arrangements with the businesses it was regulating, and that allowed economic policy to be run in the interests of powerful groups instead of the interests of the public as a whole.
Though everyone may say they are into the common good, to different individuals and groups, the common good is bound to mean different things.
AFTERWORD:
One of the key lessons of the Wisdom of Crowds is that we don’t always know where good information is. That’s why, in general, it’s smarter to cast as wide a net as possible, rather than wasting time figuring out who should be in the group and who should not. This idea is well suited to the internet.
The more information a group has, the better its collective judgement will be, so you want as many people with good information in a group as possible.
The Wisdom of Crowds is not an argument against experts, but against our excessive faith in the single individual decision maker.
If a group is smart enough to know whether an individual is a genuine decision-making prodigy, then the group is smart enough to not need that individual.
Even brilliant experts have biases and blind spots, so they can make mistakes. What’s troubling is that, in general, they don’t know when they’re making those mistakes. Experts don’t know when they don’t know something.
That’s why it’s worthwhile to cast a wider net and why relying on a crowd of decision makers improves (though doesn’t guarantee) your chances of reaching a good decision.
Be careful to keep the group diverse, and careful to prevent people from influencing one another too much.
The crowd’s judgement is going to give us the best chance of making the right decision, and in the face of that knowledge, traditional notions of power and leadership should begin to pale. I am cautiously hopeful that they will, allowing us to begin to trust individual leaders less and ourselves more.
———–
Wisdom of crowds works on problems where there’s a true answer, or when some choices are better than other in some Platonic sense. The reason this works is that people are operating on private info, which may be bad or fragmented.
The opinions are diverse — not consensus but disagreements.
People don’t know much about what others are betting on or guessing — not a lot of interpersonal interaction.
The post The Wisdom of Crowds – by James Surowiecki appeared first on Entreprenergy.
redefine your concept of nature - nature is a decentralized quantum computer where all possibility exists in multitudes and likely multiverses - when i mediate i not only focus on breathing - i flood my mind with consciousness - multitudes are choices, options, and limitless possibility - where there are multitudes there are no monoliths
A worker shells Brazil nuts, Puerto Maldonado, Madre de Dios, Peru.
For more on the lives of Brazil nut harvesters, watch this video: www.blog.cifor.org/16627/snakes-thieves-and-falling-nuts-...
Photo by Marco Simola/CIFOR
For more information on CIFOR's research on Brazil nuts in Peru, please contact Manuel Guariguata (mailto:m.guariguata@cgiar.org)
If you use one of our photos, please credit it accordingly and let us know. You can reach us through our Flickr account or at: cifor-mediainfo@cgiar.org and m.edliadi@cgiar.org
The Decentralized Basic Education 3 Program in the Kudus district of Central Java, Indonesia, demonstrates creative ways to teach the sciences. Some students from Madrasah Tsanawiya, a junior high-level Islamic school, study physics by assembling and launching a water rocket made from a used carbonated drinking bottle. Credit: Andy Wibowo, 2011