Rapid Strata Formation, Field Evidence

by Truth in science

Examples of strata formation in soft sand on a beach due to tidal action of the sea.
This field evidence demonstrates that multiple strata/layers in sedimentary deposits do not need millions of years to form and can be formed rapidly by a natural, dynamic, sorting process.
These field study examples confirm the sedimentation experiments carried out in the laboratory by Dr Guy Berthault (sedimentology.fr/) and call into question the multi-million year dating of sedimentary rocks, and the dating of fossils by depth of burial or position in the strata, or the dating of rocks by so-called index fossils.
Strata lines/layers are clearly visible in the photos.
Dr Berthault's experiments combined with other experiments (ianjuby.org/sedimentation/) and other field studies of floods and volcanic action show that strata, rather than being formed by gradual, slow superimposition of sediment, with each individual stratum or layer representing a certain time period, or even a particular, historical epoch. The process of particle segregation in moving water or airborne particles can form strata or layers very quickly. Such field studies and experiments demonstrate that Steno's 17th century, Principle of Superposition is not valid. Strata/layers can no longer be assumed to represent a particular chronology. So, there is no reason to deduce that strata relate to different epochs/geological eras or a multi-million year timescale. Composition of strata/layers is more likely related to the conditions relevant to a location/geography, rather than particular age.
The old idea that micro-strata or layers are similar to tree rings, i.e. that a millimetre or so of layering or micro-strata relates to superimposed, seasonal or annual deposits, is obviously erroneous. It also shows that the relative position of fossils in rocks (biostratigraphy) is not indicative of a particular chronology or order of evolutionary succession. Obviously, the uniformitarian principle, on which the geologic column is based, can no longer be considered valid, and the multi-million year dating of sedimentary rocks and fossils needs to be reassessed. The dating of fossils by the assumed age of the rocks and the dating of rocks by the assumed, evolutionary age of the fossils, is really just circular reasoning. It is now outmoded and needs to be re-examined in the light of the findings of modern observational and experimental research.
Rapid deposition of multiple, strata in a single event, also explains the enigma of polystrate fossils, i.e. large fossils that intersect multiple strata. In some cases, tree trunk fossils are found which intersect stratified sedimentary rock up to forty feet in depth. Obviously, they must have been buried in stratified sediment in a short time, or they would have rotted away.
Radiometric dating is based on unverifiable assumptions.
scienceagainstevolution.info/v8i8f.htm

youtu.be/vnzHU9VsliQ

254 photos · 1.5K views
1 3