Rapid strata formation in soft sand - close-up photo 2

Close-up photo of strata formation in soft sand on a beach due to tidal action of the sea.

See distance photos for location detail and context.

See set of photos: www.flickr.com/photos/101536517@N06/sets/72157635944904973/

 

Rapid Stratification

This demonstrates that multiple strata in sedimentary deposits do not need millions of years to form and can be formed rapidly. This is a natural example which confirms the sedimentation experiments done by Dr Guy Berthault (sedimentology.fr/) and calls into question the multi-million year dating of sedimentary rocks, and the dating of fossils by depth of burial or position in the strata. Strata lines/layers are clearly visible in this photo close-up.

Dr Berthault's experiments and other experiments (ianjuby.org/sedimentation/) and field studies of floods and volcanic action show that rather than being formed by gradual, slow deposition of sediment, with the strata or layers representing a timescale or even a particular, environmental epoch, particle segregation in moving water or airborne particles can form strata or layers very quickly. Such field studies and the experiments demonstrate that there is no reason to deduce that strata relate to different geological eras and a multi-million year timescale. www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PVnBaqqQw8&feature=share&amp... It also shows that the relative position of fossils in rocks is not indicative of an order of evolutionary succession. Obviously, the uniformitarian principle, which the geologic column is based on, can no longer be considered valid and the multi-million year dating of sedimentary rocks and fossils needs to be reassessed. Such rapid deposition of stratified sediments explains the enigma of polystrate fossils, i.e. large fossils that intersect several strata. In some cases, tree trunk fossils are found which intersect the strata of sedimentary rock up to forty feet in depth. upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/08/Lycopsi... They must have been buried in stratified sediment in a short time or they would have rotted away. youtu.be/vnzHU9VsliQ

 

Carbon dating of coal should not be possible if it is millions of years old, yet significant amounts of Carbon 14 have been detected in coal and other fossil material, which indicates that it is less than 50,000 years old. www.ldolphin.org/sewell/c14dating.html

www.grisda.org/origins/51006.htm

 

Evolutionists confidently cite ages for rocks and fossils, but what most people don't realise is that no one actually knows the age of sedimentary rocks or the fossils found within them. So how are evolutionists so sure of the ages they so confidently quote? The astonishing thing is they aren't. Sedimentary rocks cannot be dated by radiometric methods, and fossils can only be dated to less than 50,000 years with Carbon 14 dating. The method evolutionists use is based entirely on assumptions. Unbelievably, fossils are dated by the assumed age of rocks, and rocks are dated by the assumed age of fossils, that's right ... it is known as circular reasoning.

www.nhm.ac.uk/nature-online/science-of-natural-history/th...

 

Location: Yaverland beach, Isle of Wight. Date of photo: 20/09/13. Depth of sand deposit: approx. 8 inches.

 

Visit the fossil museum:

www.flickr.com/photos/101536517@N06/sets/72157641367196613/

 

Debunking evolution:

www.newgeology.us/presentation32.html

Just how good are peer reviews of scientific papers?

www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60.full

www.examiner.com/article/want-to-publish-science-paper-ju...

 

Done