View allAll Photos Tagged wtll
.
'I .
j.
I I Assessment Year .
INDIAN INCOME TAX RETURN VERIFICATION FORM [Where the t.lata of the Return of Income/Fringe Benefits in form (SARAL-11 (ITR-1), 2 0 1 0 -11~ ITR-y ITR-2. ITR-J, ITR-4, 1TH-5, ITR-6 trnnsmillcu elecrronicully wilhout digital signature! -0 (Please see Rule 12 of rhc lncome-La.t Rult"S. I962) .
\J:. PAN.
· ' .
ABGPS9142LName .
tiJ .
GURINDER PAL S ING II ..
~ Name Of Premises/Building/Village Form No. whichFlat/Door/Block No.
~ v.
< ~ 59 HEI\IIWNT COLONY, t; . --.. -----:t::.~:en:-al~y--1rrR-4 ~-------1--ii!~-.::.-:~. ;oad/StrectJP~~:~mce ---Arca/-Lo~n-li transmitted (fill NEIJRU PLACE ~ro~~:j ~ Status (fill the.
Pin INDL.
;:~ Stale -.
code).
~0 ~ Town/City/Oas trict I I0048.
~w DELJII.
:2 ~ 1-NEW DELHI I.
Ongina!.
I Originat or Revised j.
:Z Q .
Designation ofA 0 (Ward 1Circle) j23 ( 1).
~ I Date(DD/M~l/YYYY) 30-09-2010 .
c. lt65241290300910 963 I 19.
w E-filing Acknowledgement Number I .
100000.
.
1 Gross total income 2. ,.. 863120.
2 Deductions under Chapter-VI-A ", 3 0.
r~'}K,~ .
JaJ Totallncome _ .'. .'·\ .. 167824.
a CurrentYeaFloss,ifnny ' 4~ . . '-..-·, :·~~ 1336.
4 Net tax payable ,. 5.
o z ·,.
.. , 16916.
fntercst payable .....7~'~...-.~.... -. ~-:.r :_ .,..,..i,;.:( "" l 6 t~·~ -··.· ~ ·,.
( ~~ ·s -~-:,. "·~~" :~~··,.....Jlii·.
, ~-,,y,!lt,..; '·y.---~.r -.,·= --~~./"""-;.
Total tax and interes(payable ~J" · ,. ... ~~ -~ ..... .... _....__ .. t'"J't'5,~"".
·.
" --, ,, ., .. _ _'I_,..
~ !ii -6 · -· .r _, ~:lao:. ~~"',j ·~.'i:J ··:..
· -7 Tax" Paa·d ~ "' "' .... .... 85000 ,,_.;,~ ..:&'1. · :... Prr ~~.
z0 !-< ~ "~-~.,. 7a -. ~~ "': ':.. · ~'""""" ' Advance Tax ""'" -.,.. -~:. ..
E-~ a "-7b "' -· 71012 .
--( !-< b TDS '·.,..r 0 ~ir, · :.
.
!:; e 7c ~~;!.
·.
c TCS 13150.
~ < 7d 169162.
SelfAssessment Tax 7e.
8 d.
· Total Taxes Paid (7a+7b+7c +7d) 8 0 .
· · -· -· · e 0.
.
8 Tax Payable (6-7d) 9 ---.
9 Refund (7e-6) .
-----l _____ .
VERJFICATION , holding pennanent account number ABGPS9142L .
, son/ daughter of SHRI JASPAL SINGH .
solemnly declare to the best ofmy knowledge and belief, the infonnation given in the return and the schedules thereto which have been transmitted I, GURINDER PAL SINGH .
electronically by me vide acknowledgement number mentioned above is correct and complete and that the amount oftotal income/ fringe benefits and .
~~· .
benefits chargeable to income-tax for lhe previous year relevant to the assessment year 20I0-11. I fw1ber declare that I am making this return in my and I am also competent to make lhis return and verify it capacity_!$ Place NEW DELHI .
other particulars shown lherein are truly stated and ace in accordance with the provisions ofthe Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect ofincome and fringe .
~~ Date J0-{)9-2010( / Sign here r , Counter Sgnature ofTRP Ifthe return has been prepared by a Tax Return Preparer (TRP) give rurther details as below: .
Name ofTRP.
ldentiftcataoo No. of TRP .
.
FoI r Office Use Only Filed. from IP address I59.180.69.90 I .
Receipt No .
I I ~~~~~J.
Dale A8GPS91 42L4165241290300910CB66FB84DE01047BAA5F904893382677B37n98B Seal and signature of recehling official .
Please furnish Form ITR-V to "Income Tax Department -CPC, Post Bn-g No-:. i, EleCtronic City Post Office, Uangnlorc 560I00, Knrn:llnku",by ORDINARY POST oc SPEED eos:r ,withtn 120 days from date oftransmitling the data clccuonicolly Form ITR-V shall not be received in any other office of lhe lncome-tn.X Department or in uny .
other manner The n~cc1pl of1h1s ITR-Vat ITD-CPC wtll be sent ro you ar chis e-mail addr~wahemant@rediO"mail.com .
.
.
.. .
.
I .
.
.
Unite Against ABVP's Lumpen Brigade's Repeated Attempts to Spread Violence!.
Punish The Culprits Of The Lohit Hostel VIolence!.
Resist Administrative Indulgence To ABVP's Habitual Communal OffendersII.
Speak Out Against RSS-BJP-ABVP's Communal Hate MongeringI.
.
~oln JNU~U's.
Pretest March Tonight (22.3.09) at 9.30pm from Ganga Dhaba.
De'iandlng Speedy l!nq~lry and P,unlshment Against the Perpetrators Of The Violence In Lohltll .
. AISA cong! atulates the re~idents of Lohit who are showing determmed resistance to the repeated acts of organisedvrolence by a ounch of habitual offenders in the hostel. The firmness with which they stood up in protest during the.
violence and deposed before the Hostel enquiry Committee braving physical and verbal threats and abuses by.
the ~BVP lumpens are a testimony to the fact that the JNU student community will not allow such serial communallymotivated violence-mongers to go scot-free. .
Like in·every other campus,ABVP, in this campus too, has no academic or any constructive role to play. ABVP neverspeaks of any student Issues -fanning communal hate, anti-women and castelst sentiments remain thei,r only.
agenda. .
Students get to know of ABVP solely through their periodic acts of targeted violence which they calculatedly.
orchestrate to vitiate the campus atmosphere. .
Be it the grievous physical assault on a senior Ph.D. scholar from minority community in Lohit Hostel in Oct 2007, themassive vio.lence during JNUSU election Presidential Debate in Nov 2007 again, the violence during Chandrabhaga Nighton 16 March 2008 or he recent violence in Lohit hostel where a student from a minority community was seriously injuredand several others students including women students were abused, all indicate the vicious nature and pattern ofABVPagenda. In their latest spate of attack, ABVP activists have not spared even the faculty (the Sr. Warden) and the security 's staff. In all these cases it is almost the same set of offenders who invariably figure in..
ABVP's activities on the campus are nothing but a propagation of the hate politics of the RSS~BJP-VHP~ombinethat they are a part of. We have seen the vicious manner in which ABVP regularly makes political use ofevery.
opportunity to further their poliU<;s of hate and violence. Following the blasts in Delhi, the campus was witness to some of.
the most provocative and venomous leaflets. explicitly targeting and humiliaUng a minority community. With the LokSabha elections around the corner, RSS-BJP campaigners are on a rampage again, with Varun Gandhi leading.
the pack, giving open calls to terrorize, kill, and forcibly sterilize the members of a minority community. Everydemocracy-loving person of this country must rise up against such direct assaults of this communal brigade.Such being the organizational culture and political task of the ABVP, it has taken up upon itself the task of JNU too..
While the ABVP and its culprit activists of the Lohlt Hostel violence are flaunting a High Court order claimingutemporary reprieve", it is evident from the HC order itself that the culprits of Lohit violence have lied and.
misrepresented facts before the hon'ble Court. .
It is true that one of the leading culprits Santosh Pathak suffers from epilepsy and had been advised bed rest byAllMS. Does this imply that he was not involved in the violence? There are innumerable witnesses to testify thathe led the physical assault on the vict1m that n1ght. Probably in ABVP's dictionary compulsive violence by Its.
activists is also a state of "bed rest". .
Further, the claim of the lawyer of the culprits that they were holding a legitimate hostel GBM or the claim that the.
senior Warden does not have the authority to serve "out-of-bounds" order are a calculated misinterpretation of.
JNU's own mandated rules and regulations governing hostels, discipline and punishment..
It is a matter ofwonder and worry why the JNU's legal counsel did not contest these farcical claims by the ABVPlawyer on the basis of JNU's own rules and procedures. At any rate, ABVP's lawyer did not have the courage to.
deny the acts of violence per se and so the Hon·ble Court has merely staved the uout-of-bounds" order tempo-.
rarily and asked the Enquiry to be completed at the earliest. .
AJSA demands that all the enquiries, both at the Hostel and Proctorial level, are completed without any delayand exemplary punishments be given to this bunch of habitual offenders..
The present JNU administration is well known for its indulgence towards the ABVP lumpens for their every act ofcrime. Itappears a section ofthe administration has a vested interest in keeping the campus in a periodic tensionso that every other issue ofstudents' .
interest could be suitably deflected. This !ndulgence by the administrationhas not only exposed its political biases as never before but has also systemattcally emboldened these habitualand communalty motivated violence mongers to vitiate the cc:mpus atmosphere time and again..
We appeal to the student community to participate in JNUSU'~ PROTEST MARCH tonight (22.3.09) from.
Ganga Dahba at 9.30pm and send a strong messag~ that the repeated vtolence by ABVP as well a~ any further inaction.
on the part of the administration towards such acts wtll be resolutely opposed by the democracy-lovtng students of JNU. .
VishaJ, Jt. Secy, AISA, JNU Sucheta, Gen. Secy., AISA, JNU.
-,!.;.
·~ ~:t -.c -;.~.·.
......... ............-.
.·. (: . . ': .,.; · I·.
.. · ,.. .. ' ..:,. · .. ...;.,... .
·,·, ·; .
,I '· .
;, I .
·'.
!· ( .·. .....:. ~"· ....-· · r:r .
.
.
eo.
ar .
.lS .
~( .
f. .
., .
.
Regarding the SIT, the UGBM of 27.02.02 had given a mandate for struggte aginst tr te self-financing courses being run there as well as on the issue of duplication of the already existang SC&SS. As a results of the struggles in the last semester the Administration had set up an Advisory Committee on SIT based on whose recommendations the Academic Counol on , , .. .
September, 2002 resolved that short-term commercial cour:_ses will no longer be taught 1n SIT .
This is a victory for the student community. However, the issue of duplication is still unresolved .
and the JNUSU will take it up with the Administration. ~· .
On the other demands. the Administration has given the following commitments: .
The UniYersitY welcomes the idea mooted by the students that the Mahi-Nlanda\ t Mess ma\' be2. .
mn by a co-operative society. While the formation of the co-operative society \\Ould be don~ bv .
the p~ospective members of such a society, the University is ready to facilitate the formataon ~f .
such a society and agrees to constitute a working group headed by Dean of Students or ht!i .
nomine~ for this purpose. .
University will take up the issue of enhancement of post-matric scholarship to JNU students .
.
.).
""' with the respectiYe State Govemm.ents. .
It was decided that for the time being , more speciali5ts in relevant clinical disciplines should be .
~. engaged as Consultants in the Health Centre, similar to the Opthalmological and dental facilitic:.. .
.
currently available. The question of extending working hours beyond 8 p.m. would be taken up .
as and when additional funds for this purpose are available. The University will also explore the .
possibility ofopening sample collection units for diagnostic purpose in the JNU Health Centre .
.
The students demand for books to be purchased by the University Library, duly recommended by.
-"" . 's office against a proper.
.
fa culty members. would be deposited, from time to time, in the School.
l i~it.
receipt. The School Level Library Advisory Committee would be presented the consolidated .
.
of books recommended for purchase by the students. While finally recommending the books, one .
.
ofthe student councillors at the School level will be associated with this exercise. .
The Uni\·crsity agrees to augment the facilities available in the University computer system in a .
.
6. phased manner. ll1e University has already agreed !-) provide 50 computers for two Languaw· .
Labs in the SLL&CS. The University undertakes to pay for Annual Maintenance Comract respect of two computers already provided for the students in SIS. The UniYersity agrec=1 to provide some computers for the students of SIS as and when a bulk purchase is made m the llC'<t round . .
Yamuna hostel is almost ready and would be soon available for occupation. At present, th~.: target .
7. .
date for completion of Tribal Students and North Eastern Region Hostels, as mdicated by the .
.
CP\\/0 is March '003 . Attempts will be made to have at least one \\·ing of the T n bal hostel rct1d't· .
bY December 2001. .
ersity ,,.111 continue to grant support to non-scholarship holding M.Phil I Ph D c,turfcJ~I .
g The Uni' .
in their thesis I di ssertation expenses. \Â¥hile the current level of support will be duly mamtmncd .
the Unin~rsity wtll increase the quantum of this support of the maximum posstblc extent b\ Jul)· .
.
/()()3 .
d trip grant. efforts will be made to seek increased fi nancJal allocation frorn theIn rcsp~ct of fi~l .
UGC unda the T:nth FiYe Year Plan. .
One Uni,·ersity L"us has already gone for conversion into CNG system. It is expected to bc~omc .
l) .
operational ver:-soon for the University communit~· .
The present agitation marks a major step forward for our struggle against safronisahon an .
privatization. However. the struggle against these policies are far from won and the JNU5J .
reaffirms its commitment to using the opportunities provided by the achievement£ of l1: .
agitation to wage further struggles to ensure that these policies do not gam a foothold ,.., ov; .
.
university. We appeal to the student community to further strengthen its unity for the stru .
a..
ahead. .
Sd/-Sd/-Ginu Z. Oommen .
.
I.
Aibeena Shakil ..;.' .Gen. Secy.President ... .
..... .
.
.
.. .
., .. .
tnniLS~Kl.ni~----.
.
.
.. .
.
. .
Bot ke lab azaad hain tere -Faiz Ahmad Faiz Bol zabaan ab tak teri hai .
NO EXCUSE FOR GENDERED VIOLENCE ! .
It was a disconcertrng feature of the events on November 14, 2005 that the violence that took place was .
strongly gendered. Gtven the circumstances, we feel the need to emphasise on the nature of the violence of the attack. A pamphlet was brought out by the student representative to GSCASH which condemned the rather than the technrcailt1es that have been ra1sed concerning the ISSue. Witnesses wtll testify to the virulence .
;..,. gendered violence that was perpetrated. This pamphlet marked the begrnnrng of discussion on gendered v1olence and forced it on the consciousness of a wrder community of students. In the JNUSU public meeting that followed, sen1or polit1cal actrvrsts and teachers spoke against the v1olence d1rected at women. Wit-hout the .
progressrve gender politrcs of our campus, we urge that the censure of technicality must NOT be used to pamphlet, 1t 1s unlikely that th1s issue would have been mentioned at all. In keeping with ~t1e sp1rtt of a .
enforce silence, srncc it results in the fortification of patriarchal violence instead. .
The matrrx of gender politics on campus is everybody's concern and no excuse can be allowed to deflect focus .
and debate away from real issues, and these issues remarn serious, immediate and crucial to every member of .
the JNU community, not just the women who were harassed. Maintaining silence or abstaining from comment is not the solution towards a progressive gender sensitive politics. .
Unfortunately, at the moment, the debate on gendered violence 1s becoming limited to forms and external trappings... and does not address content. The fact remains that women were assaulted, not only because they were vocal/act1v1sts but also because they were women. The violence on that day is not unique but intimidate and exclude women. History stands testament to the fact that the political consciousness of women .
const1tutes an integral part of patriarchal structures and the mechanisms that are employed to silence, ' as a group has been held subservient ... We feel the time is right for women to unite against violence .
disregarding narrow sectarian interests. Our campus has seen similar expressions of solidarity when Ashok .
Stnghal's visrt had evoked protests from sections of the Left; then too, the outcome was similar -the right-.
wing beat up and hounded some protestors all the way to the JNUSU office. Even then, the existence of th~ .
parent pa;1y at the centre had emboldened those lumpens. If we don't speak out against such a glaring .
example of patnarchal violence, how then, would we expect the student representatives to GSCASH to engage 1.
everyca·,-wi~h i:1ternalized forms of gendered violence on campus? In this light, the appeal to techn1cal1ty .
assu·ned ne·.ver meanings with the council resolutions against GSCASH. P)· .
When we speak of a gender-sensitive campus, we confront a huge question mark. The debate is not about the ~~ .
can or th;,t (·hey should specifically target women? One needs to think about the effect this violence has form of the violence, but of the mentality that steers it. What allows lumpen elements to think that they on women with some. being i:ldvised to stay away from future political activity and some takrng th.jt adv1ce .
' seriously. This is the paradox cf patnarchy: first it vrtiates public spaces and makes them hostile for women. Then, it tells .
them to stay away from the public sphere, citing their own safety and honour. The source of oppress1on .
remaiPs above reproach while the oppressed bear the cross of their gender identity. .
This 1s clearly an assault on activists of a particular gender who identify with a Left ideology and the abuse is .
d1rected at them because they are women. .
GSCASH is not JUSt a punitive body responsible for punishing explicit acts of sexual harassment...and gender .
sensitivity is not just about assuring the physical Integrity of women students. There is much more to the .
politics of patriarchy than direct physical violation. There is a malignant psychological dimension reinforcing an oppressive politics which often eludes identification and challenge. Sexist language that is used and was used on the day of the protest betrays a patriarchal mindset that must be condemned. GSCASH is not a corrective effort, it is & should be, a transformatlve body: that enters the arena of .
prisons of the mind and challenges them. .
Sd-.
Dalpat, Gazalla, Afzal, Kirti, Nima, Nilanjana, Serohi, Abdun Noor, Vanessa, Kaustav.B, Jilangamba, Abhimanyu, Gautam Kr., Jaiprakash Sagar, Anand Kr. .
,1 1./ jbho..va~-i.
Tripathi, Neha, Vipan, Khalida. A .
.
.... .
.
.
Youth for Equality (YFE) .
.
President-Babita Sharma, Vice Presiden:-Sujeet kumar, Gen. Sec.-Swasti Rao Jnt. Sec. -Kumar Abhijeet ' .
29/10/2007 .
Exposing the Shameless comrades again through evidence on fellowship issue. .
Dear Friends , .
.
Fust of all YFE Cvngratufates the entire JNU student community for making our Ex-J1YUSU representatives (comrades) think about hard core studerrt issues like fellowship nrrd health etc. Now, we hope that tht!l' will not reduce themseh·es I~ a mere "M.fl.ldoor Union and Thinker of only internatiorraf issues? ".Genuine net!dsfor tl;e student ofJNU and lndw wtll have to be taken care of to serve as good student representati1·es. YF£:.' demorrstration and struggle from the Department nf Science and Tecltnotogy (DST) no/ only benefit,ed to JNU student comnutnifl', but also to the Students of entire India, because DST office order is f or wit ole India. . .
E ' en after h arc bcucr tools for making someone understand . Since SF/ could not interpret plain text in our pamphlet, we are representing tire same f acts in a diagrammatic .-few. Dear SFI-AISF, Pteas·e see tlre followilrg Flow chart representation. Even after tlris, ifyoufailto understand, tlren see on tire back of rh e pu;:ef or proofs and try to find your own propaganda exposed andfeel some amount ofStrome and refrain from baseless blaming of .
>'FE just b ecause you did not do auyrhlnc for JRF-fellowship. It is very shameful for SFI, to misinfonn JNU students about CSlR. SFI is told for their kind k nowlcdgc that money for our hiked fellowship inC IR is sanctioned by OST office order: .
GC increases fellowship but other ~nding .
agencies ( OllT, .
Q ICMR, and CSIR) did not. .
.
YFE protested in front of CSIR. It was gathered that fellowship of CSIR, DllT, and can be hiked only after the off.ce .
order from DST. .
Q .
.
YFE '''ent to DST officials and Kapil Sil.Jbal who did not bu7.7. on the issue. Then we gheraoed the D T with more than 300 students and only after this, they talked to .
YFE. .
.
Q .
.
After tot of struggle, VFE forced the DST to issue the office order for hiked feltn"ship und send to .
c''~ry fu nding agency. [n response, DBT has u lr·cud~ increased the fellowship, and SIR is actively considcrin~: this. .
Thi is the honest achicvcn1cnt of Y FF: only .
.
··was tlze nonviolent protest of YFE 1vrong in any way, which ledto the enhancement ofJRF seats and the fellows/zip money at all India level? SF/, the propaganda specialists must answer that why they did not .~upporl .
our struaafejor students' cause??? · .
Sd/ Abb~arul Haque (YFE member) and Hemant Kumar (CCC-YFE) .
P.T o. .
.
.
.
.
.