View allAll Photos Tagged security,
It's everyone's favourite less atomised than lego plaything, now in airport security person. Am slightly worried by the lack of gender balance on the security team though, might make those all important body searches a bit more difficult.
- Taken on October 28, 2005 - Uploaded by ShoZu
I make the fatal mistake of shooting vintage film at box speed and wasn't pleased with the first roll of this old 2007 film. So, I shot this 400 ISO at 200 and yes, quite pleased with the results.
Nikon FM
Nikkor 50mm f1.4 ai-s
Fujicolor Superia X-TRA 400 9/2007 24 exposure (shot at 200- second try)
A modular microscale rendition of the Wolverines/Body Count/Homeland Security level from Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2. Designed in LDraw, and inspired by -=Steebles=-.
Some of you may have noticed that, unfortunately, owing to the fact that a certain person who sells truck photos on eBay commercially has been lifting my images from this album and selling them I have had to remove 2300 photos that didn't have a watermark. I have now run around 1700 through Lightroom and added a watermark with the intention of bulk uploading them again. Rather than watermark the existing (hidden) files in Flickr one at a time it will be easier to do it this way. I definitely won’t be adding individual tags with the make and model of each vehicle I will just add generic transport tags. Each photo is named after the vehicle and reg in any case. For anyone new to these images there is a chapter and verse explanation below. It is staggering how many times I get asked questions that a quick scan would answer or just as likely I can’t possibly answer – I didn’t take them, but, just to clarify-I do own the copyright- and I do pursue copyright theft.
This is a collection of scanned prints from a collection of photographs taken by the late Jim Taylor A number of years ago I was offered a large number of photographs taken by Jim Taylor, a transport photographer based in Huddersfield. The collection, 30,000 prints, 20,000 negatives – and copyright! – had been offered to me and one of the national transport magazines previously by a friend of Jim's, on behalf of Jim's wife. I initially turned them down, already having over 30,000 of my own prints filed away and taking space up. Several months later the prints were still for sale – at what was, apparently, the going rate. It was a lot of money and I deliberated for quite a while before deciding to buy them. I did however buy them directly from Jim’s wife and she delivered them personally – just to quash the occasional rumour from people who can’t mind their own business. Although some prints were sold elsewhere, particularly the popular big fleet stuff, I should have the negatives, unfortunately they came to me in a random mix, 1200 to a box, without any sort of indexing and as such it would be impossible to match negatives to prints, or, to even find a print of any particular vehicle. I have only ever looked at a handful myself unless I am scanning them. The prints are generally in excellent condition and I initially stored them in a bedroom without ever looking at any of them. In 2006 I built an extension and they had to be well protected from dust and moved a few times. Ultimately my former 6x7 box room office has become their (and my own work’s) permanent home.
I hope to avoid posting images that Jim had not taken his self, however should I inadvertently infringe another photographers copyright, please inform me by email and I will resolve the issue immediately. There are copyright issues with some of the photographs that were sold to me. A Flickr member from Scotland drew my attention to some of his own work amongst the first uploads of Jim’s work. I had a quick look through some of the 30 boxes of prints and decided that for the time being the safest thing for me to do was withdraw the majority of the earlier uploaded scans and deal with the problem – which I did. whilst the vast majority of the prints are Jims, there is a problem defining copyright of some of them, this is something that the seller did not make clear at the time. I am reasonably confident that I have since been successful in identifying Jims own work. His early work consists of many thousands of lustre 6x4 prints which are difficult to scan well, later work is almost entirely 7x5 glossy, much easier to scan. Not all of the prints are pin sharp but I can generally print successfully to A4 from a scan.
You may notice photographs being duplicated in this Album, unfortunately there are multiple copies of many prints (for swapping) and as I have to have a system of archiving and backing up I can only guess - using memory - if I have scanned a print before. The bigger fleets have so many similar vehicles and registration numbers that it is impossible to get it right all of the time. It is easier to scan and process a print than check my files - on three different PC’s - for duplicates. There has not been, nor will there ever be, any intention to knowingly breach anyone else's copyright. I have presented the Jim Taylor collection as exactly that-The Jim Taylor Collection- his work not mine, my own work is quite obviously mine.
Unfortunately, many truck spotters have swapped and traded their work without copyright marking it as theirs. These people never anticipated the ease with which images would be shared online in the future. I would guess that having swapped and traded photos for many years that it is almost impossible to control their future use. Anyone wanting to control the future use of their work would have been well advised to copyright mark their work (as many did) and would be well advised not to post them on photo sharing sites without a watermark as the whole point of these sites is to share the image, it is very easy for those that wish, to lift any image, despite security settings, indeed, Flickr itself, warns you that this is the case. It was this abuse and theft of my material that led me to watermark all of my later uploads. I may yet withdraw non-watermarked photos, I haven’t decided yet. (I did in the end)
To anyone reading the above it will be quite obvious that I can’t provide information regarding specific photos or potential future uploads – I didn’t take them! There are many vehicles that were well known to me as Jim only lived down the road from me (although I didn’t know him), however scanning, titling, tagging and uploading is laborious and time consuming enough, I do however provide a fair amount of information with my own transport (and other) photos. I am aware that there are requests from other Flickr users that are unanswered, I stumble across them months or years after they were posted, this isn’t deliberate. Some weekends one or two “enthusiasts” can add many hundreds of photos as favourites, this pushes requests that are in the comments section ten or twenty pages out of sight and I miss them. I also have notifications switched off, I receive around 50 emails a day through work and I don’t want even more from Flickr. Other requests, like many other things, I just plain forget – no excuses! Uploads of Jim’s photos will be infrequent as it is a boring pastime and I would much rather work on my own output.
A member of the Coast Guard’s Maritime Security Response Team looks out over Boston Harbor during a training exercise Tuesday, Oct. 20, 2015. The team joined local law enforcement and other authorities to exercise skills, cooperation, and strategies to keep mariners safe and the port secure. (U.S. Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Andrew Barresi)
The 2014 Global Security Forum will be held on Wednesday, November 12th from 8:00 a.m.-3:30 p.m. at CSIS headquarters located at 1616 Rhode Island Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036.
2014 AGENDA
OPENING SESSION: 8:00 A.M. TO 9:00 A.M.
Keynote Address: "Strategic and Budgetary Dynamics Facing the U.S. Military"
The Honorable Robert O. Work
U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense
MORNING BREAKOUT SESSIONS I: 9:30-10:45 A.M.
I. Sequestration and the Politics of Defense Affordability
Jim Dyer
Principal, Podesta Group,
and former Staff Director, House Committee on Appropriations
Charles J. Houy
Former Staff Director, Senate Committee on Appropriations
Robert F. Hale
Former Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) and Chief Financial Officer
Sid Ashworth
Corporate Vice President, Government Relations, Northrop Grumman Corporation, and former Staff Director, Defense Subcommittee, Senate Committee on Appropriations
Moderator:
Clark A. Murdock
Senior Adviser and Director, Defense and National Security Group and Project on Nuclear Issues, CSIS
II. Troubled Seas: Maritime Tension in Asia
Richard L. Armitage
President, Armitage International,
and former Deputy Secretary of State
Kurt Campbell
Founding Partner, Chairman, and CEO, The Asia Group,
and former Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs
Bonnie S. Glaser
Senior Adviser for Asia, Freeman Chair in China Studies, CSIS
Website Presentation:
Mira Rapp Hooper
Fellow, Asia Program, and Director, Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, CSIS
Moderator:
Michael J. Green
Senior Vice President for Asia and Japan Chair, CSIS,
and Associate Professor, Georgetown University
III. Civil-Military Relations: The Legacy of Iraq and Afghanistan
Mark Perry
Author, The Most Dangerous Man in America and Partners in Command
COL Richard Lacquement (ret.)
Dean, School of Strategic Landpower, Army War College
Eliot A. Cohen
Robert E. Osgood Professor of Strategic Studies, Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, and former Counselor, Department of State
Moderator:
Kathleen H. Hicks
Senior Vice President, Henry A. Kissinger Chair, and Director, International Security Program, CSIS
IV. Health and Security in Fragile States
Gayle Smith
Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Global Development, Democracy, and Humanitarian Assistance Issues, National Security Council
Bruce Eshaya-Chauvin
Medical Adviser, Health Care in Danger, International Committee of the Red Cross
Jason Cone
Director of Communications, Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières
Nancy E. Lindborg
Assistant Administrator, Bureau for Democracy, Conflict, and Humanitarian Assistance, USAID
Moderator:
Talia Dubovi
Associate Director and Senior Fellow, Global Health Policy Center, CSIS
MORNING BREAKOUT SESSIONS II: 11:00 A.M.-12:15 P.M.
I. The Defense Industrial Base and Federated Defense
William J. Lynn III
CEO, Finmeccanica North America and DRS Technologies,
and former Deputy Secretary of Defense
Robert J. Stevens
Former Chairman and CEO, Lockheed Martin Corporation
Clayton M. Jones
Former Chairman and CEO, Rockwell Collins
Pierre Chao
Managing Partner and Cofounder, Renaissance Strategic Advisors, and Senior Associate, Defense-Industrial Initiatives Group, CSIS
Moderator:
Andrew P. Hunter
Director, Defense-Industrial Initatives Group, and Senior Fellow, International Security Program, CSIS
II. Iraq in the Balance
VADM Robert S. Harward (ret.)
Chief Executive, Lockheed Martin UAE, and former Deputy Commander, U.S. Central Command
General James E. Cartwright (ret.)
Harold Brown Chair in Defense Policy Studies, CSIS, and former Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff
Moderator:
Jon B. Alterman
Senior Vice President, Zbigniew Brzezinski Chair in Global Security and Geostrategy, and Director, Middle East Program, CSIS
III. Military Innovation and Changing Ways of War
Arati Prabhakar
Director, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Lt. Gen Robert E. Schmidle Jr.
Principal Deputy Director, Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, Office of the Secretary of Defense
Moderator:
Maren Leed
Senior Adviser, Harold Brown Chair in Defense Policy Studies, CSIS
IV. Expanded U.S. Engagement to Combat Ebola in West Africa
Tom Frieden
Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Anne A. Witkowsky
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Stability and Humanitarian Affairs
Ambassador Donald Lu
Deputy Coordinator for Ebola Response, U.S. Department of State
Jeremy Konyndyk
Director, Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance, USAID
Moderator:
J. Stephen Morrison
Senior Vice President and Director, Global Health Policy Center, CSIS
LUNCH: 12:15-12:45 P.M.
MID-DAY PLENARY SESSION: 12:45-1:45 P.M.
I. Looking Ahead to 2017: Creating a Renewed Vision for U.S. Leadership in the World
Jeremy Bash
Founder and Managing Director, Beacon Global Strategies, Senior Adviser, International Security Program, CSIS, and former Chief of Staff to Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta
Kori Schake
Research Fellow, Hoover Institution, and former Senior Policy Adviser to the McCain-Palin Campaign
Moderator:
David E. Sanger
National Security Correspondent, New York Times
CLOSING PLENARY SESSION: 2:00-3:30 P.M
I. A Simulated Crisis with Russia: European Energy and Other Unconventional Challenges
Richard L. Armitage
President, Armitage International, and former Deputy Secretary of State
Michèle Flournoy
Cofounder and CEO, Center for a New American Security, and former Under Secretary of Defense for Policy
General James E. Cartwright (ret.)
Harold Brown Chair in Defense Policy Studies, CSIS, and former Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff
John E. McLaughlin
Distinguished Practitioner-in-Residence, Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, and former Deputy Director of Central Intelligence
James B. Steinberg
Dean, Maxwell School, Syracuse University, and former Deputy Secretary of State
Charles B. Curtis
Senior Adviser, Energy and National Security Program, CSIS, and former Deputy Secretary of Energy
Joshua B. Bolten
Managing Director, Rock Creek Global Advisors, and former White House Chief of Staff
Moderators:
Kathleen H. Hicks
Senior Vice President, Henry A. Kissinger Chair, and Director, International Security Program, CSIS
Heather A. Conley
Senior Vice Presdient for Europe, Eurasia, adn the Arctic, and Director, Europe Program, CSIS
*Please note that this session is off-the-record
Contributing CSIS Experts:
Frank A. Verrastro
Senior Vice President and James R. Schlesinger Chair for Energy and Geopolitics, CSIS
Sarah O. Ladislaw
Director and Senior Fellow, Energy and National Security Program, CSIS
Edward C. Chow
Senior Fellow, Energy and National Security Program, CSIS
James A. Lewis
Director and Senior Fellow, Strategic Technologies Program, CSIS
Andrew C. Kuchins
Director and Senior Fellow, Russia and Eurasia Program, CSIS
Jeffrey Mankoff
Deputy Director and Fellow, Russia and Eurasia Program, CSIS
Juan Zarate
Senior Advsier, Transnational Threats Project and Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Program, CSIS
Programs
GLOBAL SECURITY FORUM
Topics
DEFENSE AND SECURITY, INTERNATIONAL SECURITY
Regions
AFGHANISTAN, ASIA, IRAQ, MIDDLE EAST, RUSSIA
Credit Michael Paulsen who took this photograph of me and others attending a class at the Harris County Sheriff's Academy on Thursday. I really enjoyed the presentations and meeting some fine security professionals.
In the later part of the 60's, the USAF began to refer to their police force as the "Security Police".
I researched the web to see if I could create a SP officer using some Hasbro Shore Patrol items. Honestly, most of the SP helmets I found online were either Blue or Black. However, I did find one image of a white SP helmet. The caption with the helmet indicated that the airman had stopped wearing the white helment once he realized what a great target it made at night. Being that this is Vietnam era, that makes a LOT of sense!
So, a basic GI Joe soldier with a Shore Patrol helmet, Carbine and pistol now represents a SP officer from the late 60's. It's a very rare combination, mostly due to the white helmet.
Both figures are 40th anniversary Hasbro GI Joes. The SP helmet is a Cotswold reproduction of a Hasbro SP helmet.
in the philippines, if your house is outside a secured village it is important you secure your water and light meters, otherwise, they can be stolen. signs of times!
"Some liberty must be sacrificed in exchange for greater security. This is obvious. The hard part is knowing how much we should give up."
...this has become a pressing issue in this country during the past years. In the name of the fight against terror people seem willing to give up a bit more liberty to feel a bit safer. But are we giving up too much? Photography - believe it or not - is important in this debate.
We want to be able to photograph things around us, and we want to feel safe doing so. However, the war on terror is encroaching on these freedoms in the name of security. We need to protect sensitive areas and we can't be too careful people say. Bridges, power plants, oil refineries, ports, highways, tall buildings and train depots are potential terror targets. Taking out your tripod at night to photograph these things is abnormal and borderline suspicious, right? I disagree. Harassing photographers is likely to have a negligble contribution in finding terrorists, however, the cost in terms of liberty is high. Even worse the state is wasting scare resources.
Why the suden need to rant? I had many encounters with paranoid law enforcement in NYC. Today I read a similar story from one of my contacts. The circumstances were different, but everything else was eerily similar. A 'suspicious site' (a rail depot). Cops checking IDs. Cops asking questions. No real logic. A sense that what happened contributed nothing to law enforcement.
Read about it here. Click on his link below the photo to read the post about what happened.
www.flickr.com/photos/nrbelex/2432509443/
I've written lots about this topic before. Read a summary here.
A while back somebody challenged my interpretation and I spent some quality time replying - and I feel it is worthwhile to post what I said here. I am not trying to mock the challenger. To the contrary, he presents the viewpoint of many in society.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Sorry you felt violated but (not being a wiseass) what were the cops supposed to do? As a Police Officer myself my opinion is going to be biased but reading the comments on here are hilarious. Everyone feels that since they are a good guy that the Police should just take your word for it and say "ok have a nice day". "I don't look like a criminal". Well who does? And if you think certain people do look like criminals I'll call the ACLU for you to try and articulate it.
They never searched your car or person and were professional. Reading the comments on here like the kite incident or how its just a camera are funny. Think hard to your self and before someone used a Ryder truck to blow up a building were you ever suspicious of vehicles in certain areas? Did you ever think that opening an envelope could kill you? That multiple aircraft could be hijacked at one time?
Is the war on terror somewhat exagerated..maybe but that's my job to investigate terrorism to stolen cars to identity theft, to dumping trash in a desolated area all of which you could have been involved in when you were stopped.
If you had been guilty of a criminal or terroristic act the same people criticizing are usually the first ones blaming the cops for not doing thier jobs and preventing a tragedy (example the airport security that let the hijackers on the planes).
Sorry, there are neccessary evils and in this case your inconvienece is miniscule to other wrongs in the world including abuse of power which this clearly wasn't.
PS your photo is quite nice. Was it a bulb setting?
Posted 2 months ago. ( permalink | delete ) "
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mazda6 (Tor) says:
"how its just a camera are funny."
I don't agree with the 'it is just a camera remark.' Cameras can be used in suspicious ways - and in those cases an investigation or questioning may be warranted. For instance, people plotting terrorist attacks often scout out areas using a video camera and/or cameras.
Nevertheless, law enforcement has limited resources in fighting terror and needs to use these resources efficiently. Not everything that is marginally suspicious can be investigated. It is not clear to me that using almost 3 man-hours on somebody who was observed for 20 seconds taking a picture of an old Chevy constitutes efficient use of resources.
Some law-enforcement is just for show. How does banning photography in tunnels and on bridge reduce terror? Anyone can sneak pictures of the tunnels with small cameras without anyone noticing. Anyone can take zoomed shots of bridges from other vantage points. There are boatloads of pictures of all bridges on the internet. How does grilling every visitor to the US improve security? Terrorists have already practiced every possible question and are the last people to trip up on this. It is just show. People want to see 'action' against terror and police and politicans want to be seen doing something. Sadly, terrorists are smart and cunning, and unless the resources fighting terror are used in such a way these initiatives and efforts will simply waste resources.
"Is the war on terror somewhat exagerated..maybe but that's my job to investigate terrorism to stolen cars to identity theft, to dumping trash in a desolated area all of which you could have been involved in when you were stopped."
Like I said above, it might have been considered odd or unusual behavior to take a photo an old Chevy in a desolute area. Maybe it was slightly suspicious. Maybe I wanted a picture of my car-bomb vehicle before driving it into the Holland Tunnel. Maybe I was practicing a special type of photography that I'd use to plan terror. Maybe. There are so many maybe's all around us. Can we investigate them all? What do you think it the probability of any of the above scenarios?
Most people engage in suspicious behavior sometimes. It may be something as simple as driving a white Ryder vans over a NYC area bridge. To illustrate the trade-off between security and liberty consider the following questions:
1) What suspicious behavior to investigate (should we check Ryder vans?)
2) How frequently should we investigate (what % of Ryder vans do we check)
If we investigate too many behaviors and too frequently we may achieve more security, but at a heavy cost to liberty and privacy. On the other hand, if we investigate too few and not very frequently, we compromise security and make terror more likely.
After 9/11 many people have accepted more (perceived?) security in exchange for less liberty. Society has accepted more frequent investigations into more suspicious behaviors. Some people - including me - believe this has gone too far.
If any sign of abnormal behavior leads to suspicion then we will be living in a paranoid and unplesant society. If every Ryder truck, every backpack, every camera is considered suspicious and subject to frequent search and questioning that would not only imply massive use of resources (lots of police), but also a the sense of living in a police state.
To fight terror police need to implement counter-terrorist polices that are intelligent and effective. What the NJ cops did that night was neither. They spent precious time investigating a marginally suspicious incident. Would the search have made more sense if I was close to a sensitive area? Yes. Would it have made more sense if I came back every night? Yes. Would it have made more sense if I was trying to hide (I was very visible)? Yes. Would it make more sense if I was photographing something sensitve? Yes.
Yet, I was not close to any sensitive areas, it was not repeat behavior, I was clearly not hiding and I was shooting an old car. In sum, in my mind they wasted scare anti-terror resources - and it seems like they waste a lot of resources on harrassing photographers these days. Those are the sentiments you hear echoed in the comments above - all of which I great appreciate! Thanks all!
Another example: Quizzing me about shooting the Sears Tower in Chicago from a mile away is not intelligent policing. To the contrary it reflects ignorance about how terrorists operate. If you want to photograph the Sears Tower you do it during the day. You use a smaller camera. You don't use a tripod. You find a more concealed position. You look at any of the 1 million shots on the web - and even if you get caught - it is the terrorist that knows how to answer police questions. Terrorists are smart. Don't mock them with dumb policing that is designed to show the electorate the police is 'doing something.'
"Sorry, there are neccessary evils and in this case your inconvienece is miniscule to other wrongs in the world including abuse of power which this clearly wasn't."
Isolated this may be miniscule, but if such incidents are frequent the burden on society quickly adds up. More importantly you are causing a nuisance and at the same time diverting scare policing resources from more effective anti-terror tactics. It may not be an abuse of power (and I never claimed it was), more than a waste of power. Where you see a necessary evil I - and the contributers above - see our hobby and passion threatened by over-zealous and ineffective policing.
However, it is not just photography it is about the type of society we want to live in. As phoneyman says "many of us still treasure living in a free society."
"PS your photo is quite nice. Was it a bulb setting?"
Thanks. Nope. Just a long exposure in Tv.
Special agents with Homeland Security Investigations led a multi-agency investigation targeting a South San Francisco-based street gang linked to multiple shootings and murders. HSI special agents executed numerous search and arrest warrants as part of Thursdays enforcement action, leading to multiple arrests.
phone security
Credit www.thoughtcatalog.com with an active link required.
Image is free for usage on websites (even websites with ads) if you credit www.thoughtcatalog.com with an active link.
in the philippines, if your house is outside a secured village it is important you secure your water and light meters, otherwise, they can be stolen. signs of times!
The blurred figure on the right is a David Jones security officer pouncing on me for taking photos. He tried to tell me that "It was against David Jones store policy to take photos without permission from management". I reminded him that as I was outside the store, the policy did not apply to me. I told him that as inside the store entrance was clearly visible from a public space, I wasn't doing anything wrong. He then tried to suggest it was harassment and he would call the police. I ignored him and continued on my merry way
Social Security Logo, Letter for those writing articles on social security.
Free to use this photo please reference the photo credit to ComplexSearch www.complexsearch.com.
Example: [Photo Credit: ComplexSearch]
I worked briefly as a Security Officer back in 2004.
As I've been on the nightshift recently & heard the Security Firm were recruiting again, I've started "guarding" 2 days a week for some extra cash.