View allAll Photos Tagged postprocessing
100% crops.
The image on the left was sharpened with Photoshop's un-sharp mask (USM) using 150%, .5 pixels.
The image on the right was sharpened by
1) creating a duplicate layer
2) setting it to overlay
3) Run the high-pass filter (filters > other > high pass) with a setting of 5px.
4) Sharpening the high-pass layer with the USM settings above.
8.30pm Saturday March 28, 2009
Lights-off to see your world in a new light
courtesy of goole.earth from my PC
taken with sigma 10-20mm....
just a test shot but i think i will love this lens,
looking forward to own one....
model: charlie clarke
photographer: saravut frank sopapunta (www.sfsfilm.com)
the version of this photo that i presented to the client wasn't quite as artistic
she only needed the background repaired and to have it be consistent with the other photos of this and another model
i always thought this photo would make a great portrait on its own right
so i recently went back to the original photo and started again and fixed it like i originally saw it in my head
MM#: 784960
My colleague Georg at a local strobist shooting. Postprocessed in the Dave Hill manner.
Strobist info: Sunlight from sundown left of camera, shoothrough umbrella with SB26 triggered by Cactus at 1/4 power from camera right. Taken outdoor in a park against the clouded sky.
Comments and critiques very welcome.
shot this on the flight from Chennai to Pune.
heavily post-processed, but happy with the results :-)
comments & suggestions welcome
Playing around at the lake today, then applying some heavy post processing. Shots taken with my 85mm f/1.8 lens.
0057 Playing with PS HDR toning and gradient map. Trying to separate myself from the average shooter with post processing. Any and all critique is welcome!
I posted a high key shot of my daughter quite some time ago www.flickr.com/photos/mexipickle/2617561702/ . My wife is interested in doing a pair of high key shots of our two kids...so I dug this shot out of the recent ones I've taken and did some PP to it.
Do you think it works? Does it pair up with the other one? Please share your comments/critiques with me.
This is a reference for all my photos this week: Duchemin recommended that, "next time you’re photographing something, take a little extra time to be aware of what is in, and out, of the frame, and try moving—do a complete circle around your subject if you have to—and see if you can’t strengthen your image that way." I did just that with all my photos this week, I made sure to carefully frame each image, I shot at different angles and different distances.
He also recommended to use a wider aperture and get closer to create a shallower DOF.
He said, “A softer focus on the background can diminish the pull on the eye, which in turn strengthens the impact of the elements in focus.”
My intention with this photo was to try to create tonal contrast by isolating the subject with post processing.
I think it has great tonal contrast I tried to photographer from the "dead cats" POV playing with his pumpkin toy.
For editing: I did some cleaning up. Sharpened and used noise reduction. I also did some dodging and burning, cropped and finished editing in ACR. I added B&W layer and tweaked the color mixer to my liking. Added curves layer, B & W layer, vignetting and brightness and contrast
From the grave of Joseph Crapp, shipwright, Cornwall 1779.
'His end was all most sudden
As hour the mandate came
Expess from Heaven -
His foot did slip, and he did fall
Help, help, he cries
And that was all'.
This is the original photograph of an abandoned chicken barn that I photoshopped into a somewhat different and, I hope, better image last month. I edited it extensively to begin with------and now, I'd like to see what the PostProcess group can do to improve it.
www.flickr.com/groups/postprocess/discuss/72157594534704752/