View allAll Photos Tagged peolpe
I'll seek you out
Flay you alive
One more word and you won't survive
And I'm not scared
Of your stolen power
I see right through you any hour
I won't soothe your pain
www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9w5ewVOrjA
ps: its the lens of my camera in my eye haha
Una volta ho letto un articolo che diceva più o meno così:
" Non uscire con una ragazza che viaggia, lei non avrà mai bisogno di te.
Cucina bene e non avrà mai bisogno che le paghi un pasto.
E’ autonoma, e non le importerà se viaggi con lei o meno.
Si dimenticherà di farti sapere quando è arrivata a destinazione.
Conoscerà tante persone interessanti che la pensano come lei da tutto il mondo e che
condividono le sue stesse passioni e i suoi stessi sogni. Con te si annoierà.
[...]
Non uscire con una ragazza che viaggia perché lei ha scelto una vita di incertezza."
Finchè si vive da soli tutto quello che c'è scritto qui sopra è un principio molto valido, ma quando trovi quella persona che ti fa battere il cuore a mille solo perchè ti sta guardando, o che ti sa capire e ti ama come nessun'altro al mondo, allora lì le cose cambiano,
Avrai bisogno di lui come l'aria che respiri,
amerai andarci fuori a cena in qualsiasi posto sia l'importante è averlo di fronte,
Ti importerà eccome di viaggiare insieme e quando non sarà possibile ti piangerà il cuore non poterlo avere accanto per vivere con lui quel viaggio emozionante,
sarà la prima persona che avvertirai e che vorrai sentire,
conoscerai tante persone interessanti e con idee e principi simili se non uguali ai tuoi ma nessuno al mondo sarà all'altezza del tuo Lui, della tua persona, che sarà l'unico e il solo di cui davvero ti importerà. Non ti annoierà mai, e i silenzi saranno solo momenti fantastici.
Avrai sì pur scelto una vita di incertezze ma la tua unica certezza al mondo sarà solo e sempre lui.
Thank You <3
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Once I read an articles where was written something like that:
"Don't date with a girl who travels she will never need you.
She cooks well and doesn’t need you to pay for her meals.
She is too independent and wont care whether you travel with her or not.
She will forget to check in with you when she arrives at her destination.
She talks to strangers. She will meet many interesting, like-minded people from around the world who share her passion and dreams. She will be bored with you.
[...]
Don’t date a girl who travels for she has chosen a life of uncertainty.
This is a very good principle if you're living your life alone, but when you find the person who makes your heart beating faster just looking at you, or who can totally understand you so your life is different.
You will need him like the air that you're breathing,
you will love to have dinner togheter, no matter where you are, everything have a sense just because of him,
You will care A LOT to travel togheter and you will be very sad if this won't be possible,
He will be the first person who you'll want to hear,
You will find a lot of great peolpe during your travels, people that probably will have your same hobbies or ideas, but nobody will be able to stand with him, because he is the only one that you cares about. You'll never be bored of him, even the silence's moments will be greats.
You have probably choose a life full of uncertainty but your only certainty will be always him.
Thank you love
Some Peolpe run away from problems, "others run right into them" \ I caught this shot during a fire a few blocks away from my house a sunday morning" before i left i had to record this action. The two man walking right into the flames, just looking for another way to fight this ambitious flames.
The Danes left England for 40 years but then started raiding again (835).
In 865 the Danes launched an invasion and in 867 Northumbria fell and 869 East Anglia followed. Most of Mercia fell and the danish country Danlelaw was created.
Wessex survived through defeating the Danes at Ashdown in 871. The English King died and his Brother Alfred took the throne. Alfred spent five years paying the Danes of. But then the Danes started attacking again and surpriced Alfreds forces.
Alfred succeded in crushing the Danes at Edington 878 and their leader was baptised as a part of the peacetreaty. Another part was that the Danes were to leave Mercia, which they did. Alfred made a new defense system and when the danes attacked again in 891 and started a 3 year war the peolpe of Wessex were able to defend themselves and the Danes gave up. Alfred bought Wessex and Mercia years of peace and economic recovery.
---------------
In the Picture there's danes with a shieldwall to left and Anglo-Saxons to the right.
A power pole cross arm and insulators in a red-zone part of New Brighton/South New Brighton. No houses here anymore as a result of the clear out of houses (8,500 in total across the greater Christchurch area) following the 2010 and 2011 earthquake events.
On a day trip to Algonquin Park Ontario Canada with my son. Oct 18, 2018. We started off just before dawn. It had snowed a little the night before and was really cold.
Algonquin Provincial Park is a provincial park located between Georgian Bay and the Ottawa River in Ontario, Canada, mostly within the Unorganized South Part of Nipissing District. Established in 1893, it is the oldest provincial park in Canada. Additions since its creation have increased the park to its current size of about 7,653 square kilometres (2,955 sq mi). For comparison purposes, this is about one and a half times the size of Prince Edward Island or about a quarter of the size of Belgium. The park is contiguous with several smaller, administratively separate provincial parks that protect important rivers in the area, resulting in a larger total protected area.
For More Info: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algonquin_Provincial_Park
Deze chartertrein werd ingezet van Amsterdam naar Apeldoorn, om vandaar uit door een diesellok van Locon de rit te vervolgen op de VSM lijn.
De trein zelf was eerder op de dag in Amsterdam aangekomen uit Keulen voor de feestgangers van de Gaypride in de hoofdstad.
Chartertrain "Railexperts" is here running from Amsterdam to Apeldoorn.
The train arrived earlier in the morning in Amsterdam, full of peolpe from Cologne for the Gaypride in Amsterdam.
i bumped it to brownhorse while he was snapping away at the parade before the World Beard and Moustache Championships he put down his digital and took a pic of me on his lomo out of respect. i like that
Melbourne, like any city I guess, is full of dark filthy alleyways that I think, are rather interesting spaces to contemplate. The nowheres that are everywhere in-between, that most peolpe would rather ignore.
Nikon F4, Nikon AF Nikkor 50mm 1:1.8 D. Fomapan 200, Adox Rodinal (1:100) 60' 20°C. Stand development. Scan from negative film.© All rights reserved. This photograph is Copyright and may NOT in part or in whole be reproduced in any electronic or printed medium without prior permission from the photographer.
SUPER GIRL ENTERTAINER FROM THE AUDIENCE WON FIRST PRIZE AT A MUSIC SHOW FESTIVAL IN AN EAST LONDON BOROUGH SUBURB STREET PARK EVENT VENUE ENGLAND DSC00385 BLACK AND WHITE
Comments on the SMC-M 85mm / 2.0 from STANS PENTAX PHOTOGRAPHY site.
George Stanley - For a short while in the mid-80's, I also tried the SMC Pentax-M 85mm F:2.0 lens. I was quite disappointed with this lens, and got rid of it FAST! Physically, it was nice &small & light-- but decent performance required stop-down to F:5.6.
George Stanley -[again] If you seek a manual K-mount portrait lens in the 85mm--135mm range, all the Pentax lenses (but not K-mount Takumars) are good choices, with two embarrassing exceptions. These exceptions are: The SMC Pentax-M 85mm F:2.0; and the SMC Pentax-A 135mm F:2.8. Both of these lenses are 4-group designs, and are quite mushy when used wide open.
- - - - - -
Marc Polman - It was this opinion [George's opinion above] on the list that kept me from buying this lens. A few months ago, however, I had the chance to buy one for a fair price. I bought it and have been very content since!
It performs remarkably well at f2, just a tad of softness. From f2.8 and on I do not notice any softness at all. It performs way better at f2.8 than my SMC-A 100mm f2.8 does at f2.8!!
Mind that I mostly shoot 100ASA slide film...
After purchasing the lens I shot a series of "portait" slides of my cat sitting on his favorite "looking post" on the balcony. Mostly shot at f2. They turned out very well, you really can count every hair... Bokeh is quite well, but I've seen better. Maybe it is something for the upcoming "Pets" theme.
So my opinion is that there have been some production tolerances in the production period of this lens. Can't explain otherwise, there have been too many different user-reports over the last few years...
Luckily my specimen performs as well as it does.
- - - - - -
David (ZX5Lx ) -. . . The K mount 85 f1.8 turns out to be he better lens at matching f-stops, but that is not to say the 85 f2.0 isn't good. On the contrary it is...just that the 85 f1.8 is exceptional including it's bokeh. The f2.0 lens is actually smaller and lighter . . .
- - - - - -
Bob Waldken - I was one of the people who has owned one and didn't much like it. The reason I disliked it was entirely due to its handling and had nothing to do with the optical quality of the lens. The focusing ring on mine was very slow to turn - although it was smooth it had a lot of resistance - and you have to turn it through more than 360 degrees, if I remember correctly, to go through the full focus range. Neither of these issues is a problem if you doing tripod-mounted and fairly static portraits, for instance, but for my kind of thing it was just too slow.
- - - - - -
Bibi Kwa (From the Web) - Very good lens. Very sharp and contrasty. Beautiful colors and bokeh. very light and in combination with 35 mm perfect travel gear.
- - - - - -
Fred - . . . I decided to test a number of 85mm lenses side-by-side, so I (temporarily) obtained a few more, so that I could test these 7 models: Super Takumar 85/1.9, SMC Takumar 85/1.8, SMC (K) 85/1.8, SMC (K) 85/2.2 Soft (for the fun of it), M 85/2, A* 85/1.4, and FA* 85/1.4. because there have been comments on the PDML about sample-to-sample variances in the sometimes-maligned M 85/2, I actually got hold of two of them, to get some insight on the variances (and yes, I do know that 2 specimens of a lens still could not provide definitive results, but it certainly is better than one sample of a lens for testing).
To be specific about the results for the M 85/2, I found that, despite its small size, despite its relatively simple optical design, despite some of the complaints about it historically here on the PDML (from whence those negatives on Stan's Lens Comments Site come), and despite my own preconceptions, the M 85/2 is actually a pretty good little performer. It was clearly not in the same league as the A* 85/1.4 for overall sharpness.
It did not have as good a bokeh as the A* or FA* 85/1.4's. However, [HERESY ALERT !!!] it was not altogether different from the K 85/1.8 (no, not as good, but not horribly worse, either). The M 85/2 turned out to be "the sleeper" in my tests. Furthermore, both M 85/2's seemed to be as identical as I could judge them to be.
Since I was pleasantly surprised by the lens, I had actually, for a time, decided to keep one of them (to go along with the A* 85/1.4 and the K 85/1.8 that I will likely be buried with, unless they are pried out of my cold, stiff fingers by some cursed-to-be Pentaxer - ). I even tracked down instances of the dedicated hard lens case and hood for the M 85/2. But, I eventually decided that I really don't need three 85's (and the M 85/2 was really not all that much smaller than the K 85/1.8, which was still going to be my "compact" 85, anyway), so I have since sold both of the M 85/2's. (And, because of how similar the two specimens were, it would have been a "toss up" as to which one I would have kept, too.)
So, my opinions on the M 85/2 have changed over time. At first, before owning one, I thought that its simple design might have justifiably caused it to be maligned by some users. After briefly owning two of them, I found that the 85/2 is a lot better lens model than I had previously thought. However, I did finally sell my two specimens, and I am now an ex-85/2-user, so I suppose that says something, too. (And, I should point out, I think that the $411 that one of them recently garnered on eBay is unreasonably high.)
Well, I think that, if the K 85/1.8 could be "the poor man's A* 85/1.4", then the M 85/2 could be "the poor man's K 85/1.8". (I am not sure how the FA* 85/1.4 fits into this reasoning , but I digress...) And, I do agree with Bob (Rfsindg@aol.com), who recently said:
> It's a nice, compact and fast lens and will let
> you go places the zooms will never take you.
- - - - - -
Jens (Denmark) - I have had one for some months now - I got a good bargain. The focus ring must be turned a long way - not 360 degr. but about 270 degr. Optically it is very good - not outstanding. It is (almost) as sharp/contrasty as my SMC F 70-210/4-5.6, which is VERY good for a zoom lens (one of the best ever made in this focal length area). The color images of the 85mm/2.0 are very beautifull. It is better for "glamour-shots" than for super sharp/contrasty news shots . . .
- - - - - -
Bob S. - I used it for years with great pleasure. It . . . had several advantages. It is very small, just a touch longer than a 50/1.4 and lightweight. At 85mm it is easier to isolate your subjects than with a 50mm, but not as restricting as a 135mm is inside the house. And at f2.0, you can take pictures in subdued lighting without a flash. This is especially nice now that 400 & 800 film speeds are so available. It makes candid shots easy.
- - - - - -
Arnold Stark - The lens has rather low resolution not only wide open but also when stopped down. All other Pentax 85mm lenses are superior in that respect. Maybe ALL other SMC Pentax primes offer better resolution.With just 5 spherical elements one probably cannot construct a fast lenswith very high resolution. However, high resolution is not necessarily what you really want in a portrait lens. I did some very nice and natural portraits with this lens. Nicely blurred background. Beautiful colours. The M85/f2 is almost as small as a normal lens, so one can easily take it everywhere without intimidating the peolpe you want to portrait, and mechanically it is really wonderful. I should not have sold mine. But of course the FA77/f1.8 is still a greater joy...
- - - - - -
William Robb - The M85mm f2 is one of the mor maligned lenses on the list. I have heard more bad about this lens than most any of the primes. Personally, I don't think it deserves the rap. It is a pretty solid little picture maker. Ideal for portraiture. . . I always enjoy using it, and am pretty happy with what it does for me. I haven't used it outside the studio much, so I don't know how it does in general use.
- - - - - -
William in Utah - . . . I just picked up one of these . . . about a week and a half ago, and I . . . like the long throw of the focus ring. It seems that it makes it easier to use for portrait pictures. I have so far been satisified with the optical performance (most photos taken between f/2 and f/4) and it seems to do a pleasing job with both color and b&w. A very likable lens, IMO.