View allAll Photos Tagged overprocessed
sadly, we are no longer in touch & I hate when rifts happen that cannot be repaired. It's the part of life that sucks & I wish it never happened...
The edit of course is all me. :)
I spent most of my childhood crawling deep into books. The deeper the better.
We moved frequently. Being the New Kid at school, in a class full of other kids who had grown up together, was a thing I expected to endure each September.
Eventually, I figured out I had no more control over whether or not we moved, than I had over whether the Russians bombed the shit out of me. (It was, after all, the sixties…) But one day I realized that I could always choose the things that occupied my mind.
I started light with Dick and Jane – and that wonderfully antiseptic world they lived in where Father always wore a suit and Mother even wore a frilly dress to fix supper. The kids all got along and Spot was a cool dog. Even Sally was mostly okay…vacuous as hell…but mostly okay.
Then I moved over to the Hardy Boys (and Nancy Drew when no one was watching since they were basically the same kind of story…although one was ostensibly for girls). After that I main-lined Doc Savage and Tarzan, Sam Spade and Miss Marple. I ate up AA Merit and Jules Verne and Robert Louis Stevenson. My heroes weren’t actors or athletes. They were Heinlein and Asimov, King and Matheson. On my more shadowy days I read Edgar Allan Poe and the Dark Shadows series. I totally bought into all of it.
Why am I telling you this?
Because remembering my childhood is a little like photographing old cars. They awaken the same sense of longing I used to feel reading fiction. I have this powerful sense that nothing bad could possibly happen in these beauties.
In the world these cars came from Father would always have time to play catch and Mother would bake endless cookies and the house would look like a photographer from Good Housekeeping was expected at any moment. Sally could always be counted on to say something cute. And Spot would never EVER pee on the floor.
There’s something majestic about these regal vehicles, something utterly surreal. They carry in the very fabric of their metal, something wonderful. Simply sitting a car like that would be like breathing magic, right?
In my mind’s eye I can see the whole family cruising down the highway listening to the radio and singing along with Nat King Cole and Bing Crosby. These cars were designed to go out on frosty Christmas Eves and return home with the perfect tree tied to the roof as the snow gently falls and everyone inside is smiling.
They are tough little time travellers because they are survivors, rolling gently into our world from a time when making something beautiful was more important than gas mileage, when designers put fins on their cars because they added elegance and, let’s face it, just looked really cool.
This car was magical to me. I could smell sweet dreams all over it. This image is about trying to infuse that sense of wonder and longing in a picture.
Full moon (or shortly after) shot taken on Dec 13th. This photo is a stack of 50 different exposures (of varying length) stacked by multipoint registration in Registax, deconvolution in Astra Image and final processing in PS CS3.
Image was taken with a Canon 300D and Celestron C-6N telescope at prime focus. Exposures were done at ISO 100 and exposures varying from 1/4000 to 1/2000.
If you want to see just what stacking multiple shots gets you, compare the above image to a single exposure processed (I overprocessed it though) in PS using high pass filters. That Image can be found here
A little series of Dogwood blooms. The flowers are the yellowy greeny bits in the centre. The white "petals" are actually bracts. I love dogwood. Our Darling Daughter "saved " them for us so we could see them on our recent trip to visit her. The Redbuds were still pretty too but too high up for me to photograph easily! These are perhaps a BIT overprocessed but I was doing them so I could try to paint some and wanted to really see details. Anyway, enjoy a touch of the southland! We had a BALL with our babes but a WRETCHED drive home in a blizzard ALL the way home- 1280 km - one way! We were on the road 18 hours yesterday. Today...!!!!!
This is a set of three variations based on a single image. The original is an in-camera multiple exposure of two ICMs of the same tree branches, taken early this year. The camera blend mode was Lighten which erases parts of the dark branches giving it a glitchy feel.
The three versions are progressions. The monochrome one is a straight edit using Nik Silver Efex to convert to B&W. I rather liked the intermittent patterns this produced.
The second is the same but this time tinkering in Silver Efex with toning and inverting the Curves graph (in the film attributes) to give it a blue negative look. The effect was quite different to the plain edit, like a moonlit scene.
The third version was an over-mangle for Sliders Sunday today. Version 2 was processed in Nik Color Efex using a bit of solarisation and a Bicolor filter to reintroduce some colours. Then I decided to try mangling some more, so I duplicated the layer, flipped the copy horizontally and then blended the two layers with Pin Light. (I’ve rarely used Pin Light before so it was a novelty for me, though the best of the blend modes in this instance). Finally, a bit of tinkering with the colour and brightness, and a run-through with Topaz Denoise AI to get rid of some of the noise overprocessing introduced.
The end result strikes me as being a bit sinister though that was not my intention.
Thank you for taking the time to look. I hope you enjoy the images. Happy Sliders Sunday :)
In an attempt to avoid housework, I am overprocessing my photos. Happy Bench Monday, have a good week!
PLEASE VIEW IN SOMETHING OTHER THAN GOOGLE CHROME (for MAC, not sure about PC) - it seriously limits the colors. see here for details.
Just trying to do something different and be creative. Maybe I'm guilty of over processing. However, since I was so rushed on this trip for all of my shots (w/wife and 2-year-old in tow), I didn't feel like I had the time to set up for epic shots and sunsets/sunrises. Maybe I'm over compensating for lack of composition on some of these:) If you take a look at the original shot below, you can see what I had to work with at the start.
How I did this, in case anyone's interested:
* Opened the original raw image in ACR and did my usual process of tweaking the fill light, upping the contrast, upping the blacks, etc. I pretty much use the same process as Tom Bricker, see this tutorial www.wdwphotography.com/workflow-tom-bricker/. BTW, I highly recommend this site for everyone - get yo learn on.
* Once in PS, I upped the shadows/highlights to bring out the shadow detail on the tower and bring it out of the darkness.
* Attempted to remove some of the fisheye effect with the distort tool because of the next step...
* Using the distort pointer tool, widened the base of the picture to use forced perspective and make the tower look… well, towering
* Applied Topaz Adjust on the image to bring out all of the subtle stains and lines in the stucco of the tower.
* Created a ray of light from behind the tower using the technique here: photoshoptutorials.ws/photoshop-tutorials/photo-manipulat...
* Added a rounded corner on the entire picture as shown here: matthom.com/archive/2004/09/10/fast-rounded-corners-in-ph...
Constructive criticism and feedback is welcomed.
We eventually made it all the way up Armstrong Canyon to Owachomo Bridge. I wanted a photo (of course) but didn't want to take the same photo as the last time. So I scrambled around for a while and came up with - Surprise! Another hdr of the bridge with water in front of it. Different angle, different pool of water, but there ya go.
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ_____________________________________________ÂÂÂ_________________________
© All rights reserved. Use without permission is illegal
DO NOT REPRODUCE, COPY, DOWNLOAD, BLOG, E-MAIL OR USE MY PHOTOS IN ANY WAY WITHOUT MY PERMISSION.
The sunset was beautiful. I was there with my camera and tripod. Took multiple photos with HDR in mind. Got home and it didn't look at all what I saw in real life. But with the idea in mind that there is no such thing as a "bad" photo I spent endless hours endlessing processing all my sunset photos from that day into this image. It's completely overprocessed, and not much better than when I started but at least I think its more interesting.
Caught this "Semi" as we were passing it. Not often I get to be the passenger in the back seat, so to relieve boredom I got the cell phone out and "played".
Used Prisma: Breakfast filter - all in the iPhone. First for a Painterly effect - then used only a bit of a slide for HSS in Adobe Photoshop Elements.
For - Happy Slider Sunday - HSS!
An attempt at over-processing a picture - on purpose.
Mombarone e Cavallaria
IR72 filter + textures
Ovvero prendere una foto mediocre pacioccarla.. aggiungere layers ed ottenere un risultato ancor più mediocre...
Uh oh, found the split tone sliders in Lightroom. Will try to resist the urge to pollute my stream with a bunch of overprocessed nonsense...
A Summers morning down by the river at Kirkby Lonsdale. Images are intentionally overprocessed to give a HDR feel to them
Taken from the Napa Valley Wine Train. It was difficult to get a decent capture with the shaking and window glare. Lightly textured and heavily processed to make this scene look somewhat like a painting.
Still practising sunsets, quite happy with how these came out. Pity there wasnt more colour in the sky (there was with my eyes, just not through the lens!). Dont want to overprocess too much but do wonder if the "incredible" colours in some photos are through photoshop
Had a tough time figuring out what to process for this Friday post. Wed's photo was from Oregon and so I did some searching further from those directories. This photo's main process was done originally for: PtReyesPort@Sunset, ThePtReyesWSunset2 and ThePtReyesWSunset ...See below. I verry much liked the silluetted rock outcropping and lone tree, but at the time I was more interested in the sky for the ship composition.
So here is the sky on it's own with the beach silhouetted haystack & tree. I hope U all like it. Possibly a little overprocessed for the coloring of the clouds, but again it spoke to me.
All photos on this site belongs solely to Mark Shepley ( © www.MarkShepley.com ) Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer.
======================================================================
Thank You for viewing. High quality prints of this piece are available. Just drop me a line a02toyota @ yahoo.com This shot was cropped @ a 12"X12" aspect ratio. Print sizes offered: 8"X8", 8"X10", 11"X14",8"X12", 12"X12", 12"X18", 16"X20", 20"X30"...just let me know your needs. Your high quality print will not contain my signature (or watermark:) on the finished work, just contact info on the back side.
======================================================================
This 12"X12" version of the shot
==== === ====== === ====== === ====== === ===
| Made it to explore! Rank #127on 2010-01-15 !!:-D |
==== === ====== === ====== === ====== === ===
This is thanks to U all, cool for U to stop bye !!:-D
I first heard about this waterfall after thumbing through the book: Pokin' Round the Gorge. Easily the weirdest book on the Gorge. If you've ever seen it, you know what I mean. I think my favourite picture from the book is of a man's hand placing blackberries in a triangle shape onto a nude woman's nether region. That's just funny. And creative. Yet odd.
Anyhow, Jenna and I went out to this waterfall a couple months ago when I found this composition I liked quite a bit. But at the time, the water in the lower half of the picture was blowing out something fierce. I knew what needed to be done, but it was very cold, my hands were getting numb, and there was a fair amount of spray to contend with.
So, fast forward a couple months to a few weeks ago when I went out with Jenna, Victor, and Crisse for a day filled with waterfall shooting. This was the last one on our list. I had unfinished business with this waterfall. I knew exactly what I wanted and how I was going to do it.
I shot this at an ultra-wide 10mm (digital). I had a slim polarizer, so vignetting wouldn't be a problem with that filter. But, I needed a soft graduated neutral density filter on top of that to make sure the water in the lower portion of the photo wouldn't blow out. I also only had a Cokin P filter holder which would create vignetting if I shot at that wide a focal length with another filter. I learned a little trick from a book on filters a long time ago. After you have your polarizer set where you want it, you use low tack gum to stick an added filter to your lens barrel without causing vignetting. Problem solved. A pain in the ass, especially considering I had to keep wiping spray from both filters while trying to place it exactly where it needed to be, but I got the result I wanted.
Which brings me to my next thought I had while on a walk some time after this shot. I thought that we might be nearing the end of the age of the graduated neutral density filter, at least for digital. Here's why I had that thought. Let's say you're shooting a sunrise. The foreground will need a longer exposure than the sky, right? Okay, so let's say there's a three stop difference between the foreground and sky. Using live-view on your camera, you use a thin white ruler on the LCD that you move to the transition point between the foreground and sky. A simple dial could be used to move the ruler up and down on the screen to wherever you want it. Then, the camera looks at the foreground, takes a light reading, and sets the correct exposure. It takes two photos. One long exposure for the foreground and a shorter exposure for the sky. Inside the camera, in RAW, it combines the images into one picture in nanoseconds. You can manually decide how sharp or soft you want the transition point to be if you'd like to have that kind of control, but you don't have to. Voila! Goodbye neutral density grad.
Obviously, you can do this in Photoshop, but come on, in this instant gratification age? I don't have that kind of time. Especially if a computer can do it for me much faster in my camera while I'm on location. It could be a simple function on any new digital camera. Bring it on, Canon, Nikon, and Pentax. I'm waiting.
If you'd like, you can take it one step further. This would be trickier though. Same procedure as above, but only one shot, not two combined. Here's how. Knowing that one side of the picture will need to be a longer exposure than the other, the exposure begins for both sides of the picture at the same time, but after the sky gets done exposing first, the sensor's pixels stop exposing for the sky and waits for the exposure to end for the sensor's pixels capturing the foreground. The power is just cut to those pixels exposing for the sky and they stop receiving light. The transition zone would expose between the time of the sky and foreground to look like one seemless exposure. That would be about perfect and there wouldn't be an overprocessed HDR look. But this would really only work on compositions where one side of the picture required a different exposure from the other side, not in multiple areas of the composition, or an uneven transition zone. That's the point where HDR will finally need to rise to the occasion and actually look real while performing this action. They're still a ways off from that as far as I'm concerned. But my first idea of comibining two exposures in camera could be done in a few weeks. At least the writing of the program to perform this function.
Messy processing...
Spent a lovely bright afternoon at Wilstone Resi - bit too bright really. Would have looked great at sunset but I had to be somewhere else..so I sent this to LR/Color Efex and gave it the 'sunset treatment' instead. OMG :)
for Sunday Sliders
2 textures in PSE and Vintage colour in Lightroom and upped the saturation of the purple shed.
Dr. Morse's Indian Root Pills was one of the most successful and enduring products to be manufactured and marketed in North America as part of the lucrative patent medicine industry, which thrived during most of the 19th and 20th centuries. Its manufacturer claimed the pills contained herbal ingredients that would help "cleanse the blood," as "impurity of the blood" was believed to be the cause of all disease.
Overprocessed to the max...uninspired, I pushed the photoshop controls with, errm, interesting results
Do you remember "Fun With Dick and Jane"? Well, I DO and it was no fun at ALL compared to Fun With Sliders!! Just fooling around with this lovely, delicate pinky-mauvey- chartreusey Calla! Sorry, Little Flower!
Shot on the embankment of the Elbe river near Landungsbrücken. In case you wonder: these inclined long rods are lamps and the one in the center looked to me like a magic wand, that had set the clouds alight.
Another picture in portrait format. Seems to be my thing right now.
PS: Changed the post processing a bit today (21/03/2021) because I thought it was tad too dark and overprocessed/to artificial...
Enlarged 200% from original, and a little overprocessed, stacked video using RegiStax. The size difference in the moons is clearly evident.
...I almost missed them. But just about found time in my diary (not dairy, as is my habit to type!) and the weather gods aligned to allow me to get out and experience.
These are SOOC, as it makes it so much quicker to process :-)))
But, yes, I had that secret weapon in my SOOC arsenal... my helios lens... which adds something a little extra, without needing to prod and poke and overprocess (I hope!).
Three exposure HDR image looking out over Lake Windermere. Maybe a little bit overprocessed, but it's the only way I could make a gloomy image pop a bit more. Plus I love vignettes.
The Eagle nebula is a star-forming region in the constellation Serpens, about 6500 light years away. The famous "pillars of creation" (immortalized by the Hubble 'scope) can be seen in the middle of the nebula.
This one suffers from a) too little exposure time, and b) a very low angle (under 25 degrees) due to my latitude. It's therefore a tad oversaturated and overprocessed for noise reduction, so I'm not thrilled with it.
TMB130SS and QSI 583wsg
HaRGB (minutes) 120:50:35:45
cropped to 100% on the center
June 2-3 2011
downtown Toronto, ON, Canada
The weather was rather poor, so I probably overprocessed these shots. But I like them, they make me feel like flying, without the risk. :)
The patches are from the sun battling its way through the clouds.
Affinity by Canva: First Impressions
Credit: Giuseppe Donatiello
I spent half an hour learning/evaluating Affinity by Canva.
It's not an intuitive software, especially for those who aren't very experienced with editing, but it quickly makes you realize it's not one of those toy apps. Affinity is powerful, however, and includes a wealth of editing and graphics tools on par with more well-known and very expensive software.
It's not a product for astrophotography, so its value can be best demonstrated by its performance on non-ordinary images.
I limited myself to the Pixel section, i.e., photo editing, and after some testing, I ventured into processing a raw TIFF image of M42 (box 1), a subject rich in nuances, tones, and a myriad of details.
Even with the basic settings (box 2), the result is very satisfying. However, it's by exploring the advanced tools that I discover extremely useful applications for astrophotography, such as generating false-color images (box 3) and applying powerful and incredibly simple deconvolutional algorithms.
The use of deep learning in many tools is all too evident, and it's important/recommended not to get too carried away. The experienced user will know how much to use and, above all, when to stop to avoid entering the minefield of overprocessing, which is unfortunately widespread, where artifacts are considered objective details.
For software that has become free, can you expect more?
M42 taken with 127EDmm f/9
...from the book, "How to Train Your Human."
====================================
I've been slowly getting acquainted with Photoshop. There's so many things to learn and it's a bit overwhelming so I went and got some actions to play with. It's been really helpful in learning how layers work and I really like how you can turn the layers on and off.
For the main photo, I'm not really sure what kind of look I was going for but I kind of like the result. Maybe too overprocessed? I don't know. It's different though. I was just adding actions, turning them on and off, and adjusting opacities of layers. Other than that, I don't even remember which actions I used.
One of the things I had a problem with was the upper left hand corner. Part of the couch snuck in there and I didn't know how to get rid of it so I just kind of worked around it. I guess I could have cropped it out, but I liked the framing the way it was and didn't want to change it. Don't you hate when that happens?
Other edits I did are in the comments. Which edit do you like or not like? And why? Be honest! You can also say you don't like any of them...really. Seriously, I won't ban you. :)