Two of the 216 faces starring at you from the heights of Bayon.Cambodia.

 

A translation of King Jayavarman VII`s mystic Buddhist beliefs, Bayon is a spiritual experience. From each of the survivng towers the enlightened grin of the Boddhisattva Avalokitesvara, one of the most worshipped divinities in Mahayana Buddhism and the kingdom's principal divinity, compassion radiates out in the four cardinal directions. Carved in the likeness of the King himself (his portrait is known from other sculptures found elsewhere in Cambodia and Thailand), these enigmatically smiling faces portray the King as god, symbolizing his omnipresence and omnipotence.

De toutes les églises de Rome, une seule est considérée comme étant la « mère et tête de toutes les églises » : la basilique Saint-Jean de Latran, cathédrale de Rome, siège du diocèse de la Ville.

 

Cette église fondamentale du Catholicisme est propriété du Saint-Siège et fait donc partie du Vatican (même si elle ne se trouve pas sur le territoire du Vatican). C’est une des quatre basiliques majeures de Rome, et ne l’est pas que par la taille : 12 conciles y eurent lieu, dont 5 œcuméniques tout au long du Moyen-âge et de la Renaissance (1123, 1139, 1179, 1215 et de 1512 à 1516). C’est aussi au Latran que Charlemagne se fit baptiser, à Pâques en 774, ou que les fameux accords entre l’Eglise et l’Etat furent signés en 1929, les accords du Latran.

L’Archibasilique du Très Saint-Sauveur, plus connue sous le nom de Basilique de Saint-Jean de Latran, est l’église la plus ancienne de la ville, construite avant même Saint Pierre de Rome. L’empereur Constantin Ier (306-337) l’a fit construire, selon la légende, après avoir guéri d’une maladie en 313, et sera consacrée en 324 par le pape Sylvestre Ier. C’est l’église utilisée par le pape, lorsqu’il assume le rôle d’évêque de la Ville Éternelle. Elle est bâtie sur les anciens terrains d’une ancienne famille patricienne, les Laterani, qui donnèrent ainsi leur nom à l’église, Latran. Sainte Hélène, la mère de Constantin, chrétienne très fervente, avait fait cadeau des terrains au pape de l’époque, Melchiade.

Avant le renouveau de Saint-Pierre de Rome, à la Renaissance, le siège de la Chrétienté était au Latran. Pendant 1000 ans, du IVe au XIVe siècle, le pape y avait sa résidence, son siège, jusqu’à l’« exil » de Clément V à Avignon, en 1309. L’ancienne résidence papale est encore visible, le Palais de Latran, que l’on peut voir collé à la basilique, reconverti en musée par le pape Grégoire XVI. L’église avec tant de reconstructions, eu forcément des besoins financiers importants. Les rois de France contribuèrent au financement, depuis Louis XI au XVe siècle, de façon plus ou moins régulière suivant les aléas de l’Histoire, jusqu’en 1871. Henri IV, en échange de l’assurance des revenus provenant de l’Abbaye de Clairac pour le Latran, fut remercié avec une statue que l’on peut encore voir de nos jours, et le dirigeant français fut fait chanoine d’honneur. Aujourd’hui, le Président de la République, quel qu’il soit est ainsi systématiquement fait chanoine d’honneur de la basilique Saint-Jean de Latran.

L’église que nous pouvons admirer aujourd’hui date du XVIIe siècle, sous le pontificat d’Urbain V, et est la deuxième plus grande église de Rome, avec ses 130m de long. La façade blanche réalisée entre 1732 et 1735, toute en travertin, fut conçue par le Florentin Alessandro Galilei, avec les statues monumentales en son sommet. Ces statues de 7m de haut représentent Jésus, Saint Jean et Saint Jean-Baptiste, ainsi que les docteurs de l’église. La gigantesque porte de bronze est une porte antique, qui n’est autre que celle de l’ancienne Curie romaine ! Sur le fronton, nous pouvons y lire « omnium urbis et orbis ecclesiarum mater et caput », mère et tête de toutes les églises de la ville et du monde.

 

La structure intérieure de la basilique est l’œuvre de Francesco Borromini, exécutée en style baroque. Les travaux débutèrent lors de l’année sainte, le Jubilé de 1650, commandés par le pape Innocent X. Des 14 arcades originelles, il passa à 5, retravaillant ainsi totalement l’espace intérieur de la basilique, qui retrouva l’esprit de l’édifice antique, avec ses 5 nefs. Dans chaque niche de la nef, longue de 130m, nous pouvons voir les statues des apôtres qui regardent les fidèles venus à l’église. Ces statues furent sculptées entre 1703 et 1719. Les chapelles latérales sont également issues du génie de Borromini. Le jeu de lumières que Borromini a su créer est bluffant, avec la lumière qui rentre par les fenêtres, tels des puits de lumière. Cette lumière si spéciale renforce le coté sacré de cet endroit. Borromini conservera le sol, venu du Moyen-âge, et le plafond, en caissons peints et moulures dorées, du bois sculpté du XVIe siècle.

Le sol de la basilique mérite toute l’attention du monde. C’est un sol que l’on nomme de « cosmatesque ». Ce type de sol, fait d’innombrables morceaux de marbre, était typique de l’Italie du Moyen-âge, friande de ce type de mosaïque. Le nom vient de Laurent Cosma et de sa famille, les Cosmati, des artisans qui créèrent bon nombre de ces œuvres, en prélevant le marbre des ruines romaines antiques. Ces sols sont absolument splendides, m’impressionnant beaucoup plus que toutes les statues de l’église : on n’a pas l’habitude de marcher sur quelque chose de si beau, et son omniprésence donne cet aspect chaleureux à Saint Jean de Latran, bien différent des sols en pierre des cathédrales gothiques.

 

Of all the churches in Rome, only one is considered the "mother and head of all churches": the Basilica of St. John Lateran, cathedral of Rome, seat of the diocese of the City.

 

This fundamental church of Catholicism is property of the Holy See and therefore part of the Vatican (even if it is not located on Vatican territory). It is one of the four major basilicas of Rome, and it is not only because of the size: 12 councils took place, including 5 ecumenical throughout the Middle Ages and the Renaissance (1123, 1139, 1179, 1215 and from 1512 to 1516). It is also in the Lateran that Charlemagne was baptized, at Easter in 774, or that the famous agreements between the Church and the State were signed in 1929, the Lateran agreements.

The Archibasilica of the Most Holy Savior, better known as the Basilica of St. John Lateran, is the oldest church in the city, built even before St. Peter of Rome. Emperor Constantine I (306-337) had it built, according to legend, after curing a disease in 313, and will be consecrated in 324 by Pope Sylvester I. This is the church used by the pope when he assumes the role of bishop of the Eternal City. It is built on the old grounds of an old patrician family, the Laterani, which gave their name to the church, Lateran. St. Helena, the mother of Constantine, a very fervent Christian, had given the land to the pope of the time, Melchiade.

Before the revival of St. Peter's in Rome, during the Renaissance, the siege of Christendom was at the Lateran. For 1000 years, from the fourth to the fourteenth century, the pope had his residence, his seat, until the "exile" of Clement V in Avignon, in 1309. The former papal residence is still visible, the Lateran Palace , which can be seen stuck to the basilica, converted into a museum by Pope Gregory XVI. The church with so many reconstructions, had necessarily important financial needs. The kings of France contributed to the financing, since Louis XI in the 15th century, in a more or less regular way according to the vagaries of the History, until 1871. Henry IV, in exchange for the insurance of the revenues coming from the Abbey from Clairac to the Lateran, was thanked with a statue that can still be seen today, and the French leader was made canon of honor. Today, the President of the Republic, whoever he is is thus systematically made canon of honor of the basilica Saint-Jean of Lateran.

The church that we can admire today dates from the seventeenth century, under the pontificate of Urban V, and is the second largest church in Rome, with its 130m long. The white facade built between 1732 and 1735, all travertine, was designed by the Florentine Alessandro Galilei, with the monumental statues at the top. These statues 7m high represent Jesus, Saint John and Saint John the Baptist, as well as the doctors of the church. The gigantic bronze door is an ancient door, which is none other than that of the ancient Roman Curia! On the pediment, we can read "omnium urbis and orbis ecclesiarum mater and caput", mother and head of all the churches of the city and the world.

The inner structure of the basilica is the work of Francesco Borromini, executed in Baroque style. Work began during the holy year, the Jubilee of 1650, commissioned by Pope Innocent X. Of the 14 original arcades, he went to 5, thus completely reworking the interior space of the basilica, which found the spirit of the ancient building, with its 5 naves. In each niche of the nave, 130m long, we can see the statues of the apostles who watch the faithful coming to the church. These statues were carved between 1703 and 1719. The side chapels are also from the genius of Borromini. The play of lights that Borromini has created is stunning, with the light coming in through the windows, like skylights. This special light reinforces the sacred side of this place. Borromini will preserve the soil, from the Middle Ages, and the ceiling, in painted boxes and gilded moldings, carved wood of the sixteenth century.

The basilica floor deserves all the attention of the world. It is a soil that we call "cosmatesque". This type of floor, made of innumerable pieces of marble, was typical of medieval Italy, fond of this type of mosaic. The name comes from Laurent Cosma and his family, the Cosmati, craftsmen who created many of these works, taking marble from the ancient Roman ruins. These soils are absolutely splendid, impressing me much more than all the statues of the church: we are not used to walking on something so beautiful, and its omnipresence gives this warm aspect to Saint Jean de Latran, very different from the stone floors of Gothic cathedrals.

 

De toutes les églises de Rome, une seule est considérée comme étant la « mère et tête de toutes les églises » : la basilique Saint-Jean de Latran, cathédrale de Rome, siège du diocèse de la Ville.

 

Cette église fondamentale du Catholicisme est propriété du Saint-Siège et fait donc partie du Vatican (même si elle ne se trouve pas sur le territoire du Vatican). C’est une des quatre basiliques majeures de Rome, et ne l’est pas que par la taille : 12 conciles y eurent lieu, dont 5 œcuméniques tout au long du Moyen-âge et de la Renaissance (1123, 1139, 1179, 1215 et de 1512 à 1516). C’est aussi au Latran que Charlemagne se fit baptiser, à Pâques en 774, ou que les fameux accords entre l’Eglise et l’Etat furent signés en 1929, les accords du Latran.

L’Archibasilique du Très Saint-Sauveur, plus connue sous le nom de Basilique de Saint-Jean de Latran, est l’église la plus ancienne de la ville, construite avant même Saint Pierre de Rome. L’empereur Constantin Ier (306-337) l’a fit construire, selon la légende, après avoir guéri d’une maladie en 313, et sera consacrée en 324 par le pape Sylvestre Ier. C’est l’église utilisée par le pape, lorsqu’il assume le rôle d’évêque de la Ville Éternelle. Elle est bâtie sur les anciens terrains d’une ancienne famille patricienne, les Laterani, qui donnèrent ainsi leur nom à l’église, Latran. Sainte Hélène, la mère de Constantin, chrétienne très fervente, avait fait cadeau des terrains au pape de l’époque, Melchiade.

Avant le renouveau de Saint-Pierre de Rome, à la Renaissance, le siège de la Chrétienté était au Latran. Pendant 1000 ans, du IVe au XIVe siècle, le pape y avait sa résidence, son siège, jusqu’à l’« exil » de Clément V à Avignon, en 1309. L’ancienne résidence papale est encore visible, le Palais de Latran, que l’on peut voir collé à la basilique, reconverti en musée par le pape Grégoire XVI. L’église avec tant de reconstructions, eu forcément des besoins financiers importants. Les rois de France contribuèrent au financement, depuis Louis XI au XVe siècle, de façon plus ou moins régulière suivant les aléas de l’Histoire, jusqu’en 1871. Henri IV, en échange de l’assurance des revenus provenant de l’Abbaye de Clairac pour le Latran, fut remercié avec une statue que l’on peut encore voir de nos jours, et le dirigeant français fut fait chanoine d’honneur. Aujourd’hui, le Président de la République, quel qu’il soit est ainsi systématiquement fait chanoine d’honneur de la basilique Saint-Jean de Latran.

L’église que nous pouvons admirer aujourd’hui date du XVIIe siècle, sous le pontificat d’Urbain V, et est la deuxième plus grande église de Rome, avec ses 130m de long. La façade blanche réalisée entre 1732 et 1735, toute en travertin, fut conçue par le Florentin Alessandro Galilei, avec les statues monumentales en son sommet. Ces statues de 7m de haut représentent Jésus, Saint Jean et Saint Jean-Baptiste, ainsi que les docteurs de l’église. La gigantesque porte de bronze est une porte antique, qui n’est autre que celle de l’ancienne Curie romaine ! Sur le fronton, nous pouvons y lire « omnium urbis et orbis ecclesiarum mater et caput », mère et tête de toutes les églises de la ville et du monde.

 

La structure intérieure de la basilique est l’œuvre de Francesco Borromini, exécutée en style baroque. Les travaux débutèrent lors de l’année sainte, le Jubilé de 1650, commandés par le pape Innocent X. Des 14 arcades originelles, il passa à 5, retravaillant ainsi totalement l’espace intérieur de la basilique, qui retrouva l’esprit de l’édifice antique, avec ses 5 nefs. Dans chaque niche de la nef, longue de 130m, nous pouvons voir les statues des apôtres qui regardent les fidèles venus à l’église. Ces statues furent sculptées entre 1703 et 1719. Les chapelles latérales sont également issues du génie de Borromini. Le jeu de lumières que Borromini a su créer est bluffant, avec la lumière qui rentre par les fenêtres, tels des puits de lumière. Cette lumière si spéciale renforce le coté sacré de cet endroit. Borromini conservera le sol, venu du Moyen-âge, et le plafond, en caissons peints et moulures dorées, du bois sculpté du XVIe siècle.

Le sol de la basilique mérite toute l’attention du monde. C’est un sol que l’on nomme de « cosmatesque ». Ce type de sol, fait d’innombrables morceaux de marbre, était typique de l’Italie du Moyen-âge, friande de ce type de mosaïque. Le nom vient de Laurent Cosma et de sa famille, les Cosmati, des artisans qui créèrent bon nombre de ces œuvres, en prélevant le marbre des ruines romaines antiques. Ces sols sont absolument splendides, m’impressionnant beaucoup plus que toutes les statues de l’église : on n’a pas l’habitude de marcher sur quelque chose de si beau, et son omniprésence donne cet aspect chaleureux à Saint Jean de Latran, bien différent des sols en pierre des cathédrales gothiques.

 

Of all the churches in Rome, only one is considered the "mother and head of all churches": the Basilica of St. John Lateran, cathedral of Rome, seat of the diocese of the City.

 

This fundamental church of Catholicism is property of the Holy See and therefore part of the Vatican (even if it is not located on Vatican territory). It is one of the four major basilicas of Rome, and it is not only because of the size: 12 councils took place, including 5 ecumenical throughout the Middle Ages and the Renaissance (1123, 1139, 1179, 1215 and from 1512 to 1516). It is also in the Lateran that Charlemagne was baptized, at Easter in 774, or that the famous agreements between the Church and the State were signed in 1929, the Lateran agreements.

The Archibasilica of the Most Holy Savior, better known as the Basilica of St. John Lateran, is the oldest church in the city, built even before St. Peter of Rome. Emperor Constantine I (306-337) had it built, according to legend, after curing a disease in 313, and will be consecrated in 324 by Pope Sylvester I. This is the church used by the pope when he assumes the role of bishop of the Eternal City. It is built on the old grounds of an old patrician family, the Laterani, which gave their name to the church, Lateran. St. Helena, the mother of Constantine, a very fervent Christian, had given the land to the pope of the time, Melchiade.

Before the revival of St. Peter's in Rome, during the Renaissance, the siege of Christendom was at the Lateran. For 1000 years, from the fourth to the fourteenth century, the pope had his residence, his seat, until the "exile" of Clement V in Avignon, in 1309. The former papal residence is still visible, the Lateran Palace , which can be seen stuck to the basilica, converted into a museum by Pope Gregory XVI. The church with so many reconstructions, had necessarily important financial needs. The kings of France contributed to the financing, since Louis XI in the 15th century, in a more or less regular way according to the vagaries of the History, until 1871. Henry IV, in exchange for the insurance of the revenues coming from the Abbey from Clairac to the Lateran, was thanked with a statue that can still be seen today, and the French leader was made canon of honor. Today, the President of the Republic, whoever he is is thus systematically made canon of honor of the basilica Saint-Jean of Lateran.

The church that we can admire today dates from the seventeenth century, under the pontificate of Urban V, and is the second largest church in Rome, with its 130m long. The white facade built between 1732 and 1735, all travertine, was designed by the Florentine Alessandro Galilei, with the monumental statues at the top. These statues 7m high represent Jesus, Saint John and Saint John the Baptist, as well as the doctors of the church. The gigantic bronze door is an ancient door, which is none other than that of the ancient Roman Curia! On the pediment, we can read "omnium urbis and orbis ecclesiarum mater and caput", mother and head of all the churches of the city and the world.

The inner structure of the basilica is the work of Francesco Borromini, executed in Baroque style. Work began during the holy year, the Jubilee of 1650, commissioned by Pope Innocent X. Of the 14 original arcades, he went to 5, thus completely reworking the interior space of the basilica, which found the spirit of the ancient building, with its 5 naves. In each niche of the nave, 130m long, we can see the statues of the apostles who watch the faithful coming to the church. These statues were carved between 1703 and 1719. The side chapels are also from the genius of Borromini. The play of lights that Borromini has created is stunning, with the light coming in through the windows, like skylights. This special light reinforces the sacred side of this place. Borromini will preserve the soil, from the Middle Ages, and the ceiling, in painted boxes and gilded moldings, carved wood of the sixteenth century.

The basilica floor deserves all the attention of the world. It is a soil that we call "cosmatesque". This type of floor, made of innumerable pieces of marble, was typical of medieval Italy, fond of this type of mosaic. The name comes from Laurent Cosma and his family, the Cosmati, craftsmen who created many of these works, taking marble from the ancient Roman ruins. These soils are absolutely splendid, impressing me much more than all the statues of the church: we are not used to walking on something so beautiful, and its omnipresence gives this warm aspect to Saint Jean de Latran, very different from the stone floors of Gothic cathedrals.

 

Thillai Natarajah Temple, Chidambaram or Chidambaram temple is a Hindu temple dedicated to Lord Shiva located in the town of Chidambaram, East-Central Tamil Nadu, South India. The temple is known as the foremost of all temples (Kovil) to Saivites and has influenced worship, architecture, sculpture and performance art for over two millennium. The Sangam classics list chief architect Viduvelvidugu Perumthachchan as directing an early renovation of the shrine.

 

A major shrine of Lord Shiva worship since the classical period, there have been several renovations and offerings to Chidambaram by the Pallava, Chola, Pandya, Vijayanagara and Chera royals in the ancient and pre-medieval periods. The temple as it stands now is mainly of the 12th and 13th centuries, with later additions in similar style. Its bronze statues and stone sculptures depicting various deities and the famous Thillai trees (Excoecaria agallocha) of the surrounding forest reflect the highpoints of early Chola and Pallava art while its famed gold plated gopuram towers are medieval structural additions by the royals Aditya I, Parantaka Chola I, Kopperunchinga I, Krishnadevaraya and Jatavarman Sundara Pandyan. King Kocengannan Chola was born following prayers his parents offered at the temple and later in his life he refined its structure. The shrine gave the town its name.

 

The deity that presides here is கூத்தன் - Thillai Koothan (Thillai Nataraja - Shiva, The Lord of Dance). Chidambaram is the birthplace of the sculpture and bronze image representation of Lord Shiva as the cosmic dancer, a Tamilian concept and motif in Chola art that has since become notable as a symbol of Hinduism. The shrine is the only Shiva temple to have its main deity represented in this anthropomorphic form, as the supreme being who performs all cosmic activities. The consort deity here is Sivakami Amman (form of Amman - mother goddess and female energy). Two other forms of Lord Shiva are represented close to this in the vimana (inner sanctum) of the temple - as a crystallised lingam - the most common representation of Lord Shiva in temples, and as the aether space classical element, represented with empty space and a garland of fifty one hanging golden bilvam leaves (Aegle marmelos). Lord Shiva is captured in pose as Nataraja performing the Ananda Tandava ("Dance of Delight") in the golden hall of the shrine Pon Ambalam (பொன் அம்பலம்). The sculptures of Chidambaram inspired the postures of Bharatha Natyam. The Chidambaram complex is admired for its five famous halls (ambalam or sabhai), several grand smaller shrines to the Hindu deities Ganesh, Murugan, Vishnu and Sivakami Amman which contain Pandyan and Nayak architectural styles, and for its endowment from many water tanks, one of which links it to the Thillai Kali temple.

 

Chidambaram is one of the five Pancha Bootha Sthalams, the holiest Shiva temples each representing one of the five classical elements; Chidambaram represents akasha (aether). Chidambaram is glorified in Tirumular's Tirumandhiram and was visited by Patañjali and VyagjrapadharPulikaal Munivar. It is the primary shrine of the 275 Paadal Petra Sthalams - Shiva Sthalams glorified in the early medieval Tevaram poems by Tamil Saivite Nayanar saints Tirunavukkarasar, Thirugnana Sambandar and Sundarar. Hailed in the Tiruvacakam series by Manikkavacakar, these very volumes of the Tirumurai literature canon were themselves found in secret chambers of the temple. The Periya Puranam, a biography of these Nayanar saints by Sekkizhar commissioned by emperor Kulothunga Chola II, was written in the shrine's Thousand Pillared Hall. In Kanda Puranam, the epic authored by Kachiyappa Sivachariar of Kanchipuram, the Chidambaram shrine is venerated as one of the three foremost Shiva abodes in the world, alongside Koneswaram temple of Trincomalee and Mount Kailash.

 

ETYMOLOGY

The traditional name of the temple complex, Chidambaram Tillai Nataraja-koothan Kovil, alludes to the environment of its location and its origins and significance in Saivite worship. The mangrove of ancient Tillai (தில்லை) trees (Exocoeria agallocha) of the forest surrounding the shrine when it was first built inspired the shrine's name and early artistic inspiration; the Tillai trees of the nearby Pichavaram wetlands, the second largest mangrove in the world, extends to the temple area. The shrine is venerated as Tillai ambalam (தில்லை அம்பலம் ), literally meaning Tillai Open Stage, the open space surrounded by Tillai Vanam (தில்லை வனம்) (the Tillai forest) - the original name of this area.[9] The name of the town of this shrine, Chidambaram comes from the Tamil word Chitrambalam (சிற்றம்பலம்) - "small hall/stage"; also spelled Chithambalam (சிட்டம்பலம்), from citt/chitthu and ambalam - meaning "wisdom of this open stage/atmosphere". The shrine is where some devotees believe they will attain liberation, or chitaakasam - "wisdom/consciousness of the sky". "Nataraja" or "Koothan" mean "Lord of Dance".

 

LEGEND

The story of Chidambaram begins with Lord Shiva strolling into the Thillai Vanam (vanam meaning forest and thillai trees - botanical name Exocoeria agallocha, a species of mangrove trees - which currently grows in the Pichavaram wetlands near Chidambaram). In the Thillai forests resided a group of sages or 'rishis' who believed in the supremacy of magic and that God can be controlled by rituals and mantras or magical words. Lord Shiva strolled in the forest with resplendent beauty and brilliance, assuming the form of Bhikshatana, a simple mendicant seeking alms. He was followed by His consort, Vishnu as Mohini. The sages and their wives were enchanted by the brilliance and the beauty of The handsome mendicant and His consort. On seeing their womenfolk enchanted, the rishis got enraged and invoked scores of serpents (nāgas) by performing magical rituals. Lord Shiva lifted the serpents and donned them as ornaments on His matted locks, neck and waist. Further enraged, the sages invoked a fierce tiger, whose skins and dons were used by Lord Shiva as a shawl around His waist and then followed by a fierce elephant, which was devoured and ripped to death by Lord Shiva (Gajasamharamurthy).

 

The rishis gathered all their spiritual strength and invoked a powerful demon Muyalakan - a symbol of complete arrogance and ignorance. Lord Shiva wore a gentle smile, stepped on the demon's back, immobilized him and performed the Ánanda Tandava (the dance of eternal bliss) and disclosed his true form. The sages surrender, realizing that Lord Shiva is the truth and He is beyond magic and rituals.

 

PATRONAGE

To Saivites, primarily in Tamil Nadu, the very word koil refers primarily to Chidambaram Tillai Natarajar.

 

Chidambaram is a temple complex spread over 160,000 m2 in the heart of the city. The main complex to Lord Shiva Nataraja also contains shrines to deities such as Shivakami Amman, Ganesh, Murugan and Vishnu in the form Govindaraja Perumal. Chidambaram's earliest structures were designed and erected by ancient craftsmen called Perumtaccan. The golden tiled roof for the Chit Ambalam (the vimanam) was laid by the Chola King Parantaka I (907-950 CE) following which he was given the title - Thillaiyambalathhukku pon koorai veiyntha thevan (Tamil:தில்லையாம்பலதுக்கு பொன் கூரை வேய்ந்த தேவன், meaning the one who constructed the golden roof). In its floruit, kings Rajaraja Chola I (reign 985-1014 AD) and Kulothunga Chola I (1070-1120 AD) made significant donations to the temple. Gold and riches to the temple were donated by Rajaraja Chola's daughter Kundavai II while Chola king Vikrama Chola (1118-1135 AD) made donations for the conduct of the daily rituals.

 

Donations of gold and jewels have been made by various kings, rulers and patrons to the temple from 9th to 16th century - including the Maharaja of Pudukottai, Sethupathy (the emerald jewel still adorns the deity) and the British.

 

Naralokaviran, the general of king Kulothunga Chola I was responsible for building a shrine for child saint Thirugnana Sambanthar and installed a metal image inside it. He constructed a hall for recitation of Tevaram hymns and engraved the hymns in copper plates.

 

TEMPLE STRUCTURE

The temple is the only great temple complex to date mainly from the later Chola period, and contains the earliest examples of a number of features that are found in many later temples, including "the earliest known Devī or Amman shrine, nritta (dance) maṇḍapa, Sūrya shrine with chariot wheels, hundred-and-thousand pillared maṇḍapas, even the first giant Śiva Gangā tank".A classical Shiva temple as per Agama rules will have five prakarams (closed precincts of a temple) or circuits each separated by walls one within the other. The outer prakaram will be open to the sky except the innermost one. The innermost one will house the main deity as well as other deities. There will be a massive wooden or stone flag post exactly in line with the main deity. The innermost prakaram houses the sanctum sanctorum (தமிழ் = கருவரை).

 

Chidambaram is also referred to in various works such as Thillai (after the Thillai forest of yore in which the temple is now located), Perumpatrapuliyur or Vyagrapuram (in honour of Saint Vyagrapathar, Sanskrit: Vyaghrapada - "Tiger-Footed").

 

The temple is supposed to be located at the lotus heart of the Universe: Virat hridaya padma sthalam.

 

This gold-roofed stage is the sanctum sanctorum of the Chidambaram temple and houses the Lord in three forms:

 

- the "form" - the anthropomorphic form as an appearance of Nataraja, called the Sakala-thirumeni.

- the "semi-form" – the semi-anthropomorphic form as the Crystal linga of Chandramaulishvara, the Sakala-nishkala-thirumeni.

- the "formless" – as the space in Chidambara-rahasyam, an empty space within the sanctum sanctorum, the Nishkala-thirumeni.

 

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TEMPLE DESIGN

The layout and architecture of the temple is replete with philosophical meanings.

 

Three of the five Panchaboothasthala temples, those at Kalahasti, Kanchipuram and Chidambaram all stand on a straight line exactly at 79 degree 41 minutes East longitude - truly an engineering, astrological and geographical wonder. Of the other two temples, Tiruvanaikkaval is located at around 3 degrees to the south and exactly 1 degree to the west of the northern tip of this divine axis, while Tiruvannamalai is around midway (1.5 degree to the south and 0.5 degree to the west).

 

The 9 gateways signify the 9 orifices in the human body.

The Chitsabai or Ponnambalam, the sanctum sanctorum represents the heart which is reached by a flight of 5 stairs called the Panchaatchara padi - pancha meaning 5, achhara – indestructible syllables – "SI VA YA NA MA", from a raised anterior dias - the Kanakasabai. The access to the Sabhai is through the sides of the stage (and not from the front as in most temples). The Chit sabha roof is supported by four pillars symbolic of the four Vedas.

 

The Ponnambalam or the Sanctum sanctorum is held by 28 pillars – representing the 28 agamas or set methodologies for the worship of Lord Shiva. The roof is held by a set of 64 beams representing the 64 forms of art and is held by several cross-beams representing the innumerable blood vessels. The roof has been laid by 21,600 golden tiles with the word SIVAYANAMA inscribed on them representing 21600 breaths. The golden tiles are fixed using 72,000 golden nails which represents the no. of nadis exists in human body. The roof is topped by a set of 9 sacred pots or kalasas, representing the 9 forms of energy. The artha mandapa(sanctum) has six pillars denoting the six shastras (holy texts).

 

The hall next to the artha mantapa has eighteen pillars symbolizing the eighteen Puranas.

 

TOWERS

The temple has nine gateways, and four of these have gateway towers or gopurams each with 7 storeys facing the East, South, West and North. The South gopuram called the Sokkaseeyan Thirunilai Ezhugopuram was constructed by a Pandya king identified from the presence of the dynasty's fish emblem sculpted on the ceiling. The Pandyas sculpted two fishes facing each other when they completed gopurams (and left it with one fish, in case it was incomplete). The earliest and smallest of the four is West gopuram constructed around 1150 and there are no reliable evidence on the construction. The sculptures shows goddess fighting the buffalo-demon and warlike Skanda astride his peacock. The North Gopuram was initiated around 1300 AD with the brick portion constructed by the Vijayanagara king Krishnadevaraya (1509-1530 AD) in the 16th century. The East Gopuram, was claimed to have been constructed by the Pallava King Koperunsingan II (1243-1279 AD) as per epigrahical records and was repaired by Subbammal, the mother-in-law of the famous philanthropist Pachaiyappa Mudaliar (1754-1794 AD). The idols of Pachaiappa Mudaliar and his wife Iyalammal have been sculpted on the eastern gopuram. The Pachaiappa Trust to date has been responsible for various functions in the temple and also maintain the temple car. The eastern gopuram is renowned for its complete enumeration of 108 poses of Indian classical dance – Bharathanatyam, detailed in small rectangular panels along the passage that leads to the gateway. Each gopuram has around fifty stone sculptures, with each repeating some portions from the other.

 

HALLS

There are 5 ambalams or sabhas (halls) inside the temple.

 

- Chit Ambalam or Chit Sabhai, which is the sanctum sanctorum housing Lord Nataraja and his consort Sivakami Sundari, and gave the temple town its name.

- Pon Ambalam or Kanaka Sabhai – the golden hall in front of the Chit Ambalam, from where the daily rituals are conducted.

- Nrithya sabhai or Natya sabhai, a 56-pillared hall lies to the south of the temple's flag mast (kodi maram or dwaja sthambam) where Nataraja outdanced Kali and established his supremacy

- Raja sabhai or the 1000-pillared hall which symbolizes the yogic chakra of thousand pillared lotus or Sahasraram (which in yoga is a chakra) at the crown of the head and is a seat where the soul unites with God. This chakra is represented as a 1000-petalled lotus. Meditating by concentrating at the Sahasrara Chakra is said to lead to a state of union with The Divine Force and is the pinnacle of yogic practice. The hall is open only on festive days.

- Deva Sabhai, which houses the Pancha moorthis (pancha - five, moorthis - deities, namely the deities of Ganesh, Somaskanda (seated posture of Lord Shiva with Pavarthi and Skanda), Sivananda Nayaki, Muruga and the image of Chandikeswarar.

 

SHRINES

- The shrines for the original Shivalingam worshipped by the saints Patanjali and Vyagrapathar – called the Thiru Aadhimoolanathar and his consort Umaiyammai

- The shrine of the 63 nayanars of Lord Shiva – called the Arubaththu moovar.

- Shrine of Sivagami.

- Ganesha shrine

- Shrine of Muruga or Pandiya nayakan

 

There are also several smaller shrines in the temple complex.

 

GOVINDARAJA SWAMY SHRINE

The Govindaraja shrine is dedicated to Vishnu and is one of the 108 holy temples of Lord Vishnu called divyadesam, revered by the 7th-9th-century saint poets of vaishnava (those worshipping Lord Vishnu) tradition, alwars. Kulashekara alwar mentions this temple as Tillai Chitrakutam and equates Chitrakuta of Ramayana fame with this shrine. King Kulothunga Chola II is believed to have uprooted the presiding Govindraja image from the shrine. The shrine has close connections with the Govindaraja temple in Tirupati dating back to saint Ramanuja of the 11-12th century. Ramanujar fled to Tirupati with the utsava (festival image) of the temple to escape punishment. Down the centuries, king Krishnappa Nayak (1564-1572 AD) was instrumental in installing the image of Govindaraja back in the temple. There was lot of resistance from the shaivites (those worshipping Shiva) against placing the Vishnu image in a revered Shiva temple, but the king was unmoved and the image was installed in the present form. There is no satisfactory evidence of co-existence of the Shiva and Vishnu shrines within the same temple built during the same time - there was a dispute even in last century during 1849 AD regarding the rights on the Govindaraja idol and Alwar Sannidhi(sanctum of azhwars) between Vaishnavas and Dikshitars and the position of Vaishnavas was upheld by the district court.

 

TEMPLE TANKS

The Chidambaram temple is well endowed with several water bodies within and around the temple complex.

 

- Sivaganga (சிவகங்கை) tank is in the third corridor of the temple opposite to the shrine of Shivagami. It is accessed by flights of stone steps leading from the shrine.

- Paramanandha koobham is the well on the eastern side of the Chitsabhai hall from which water is drawn for sacred purposes.

- Kuyya theertham is situated to the north-east of Chidambaram in Killai near the Bay of Bengal and has the shore called Pasamaruthanthurai.

- Pulimadu is situated around a kilometer and a half to the south of Chidambaram.

- Vyagrapatha Theertham is situated on to the west of the temple opposite to the temple of Ilamai Akkinaar.

- Anantha Theertham is situated to the west of the temple in front of the Anantheswarar temple.

- Nagaseri tank is situated to the west of the Anantha thirtham.

- Brahma Theertham is situated to the north-west of the temple at Thirukalaanjeri.

- Underground channels at the shrine drain excess water in a northeasterly direction to the Shivapiyai temple tank (சிவப்பியை குளம்) of the Thillai Kali Temple, Chidambaram. Due to poor maintenance, it has not been in use.

- Thiruparkadal is the tank to the south-east of the Shivapiyai tank.

 

TEMPLE CAR

The Chidambaram temple car is, perhaps, the most beautiful example of a temple car in all of Tamil Nadu. This car, on which Lord Nataraja descends twice a year, is drawn by several thousand devotees during the festivals.

 

ANANDA TANDAVA

The legend of the temple is same as the legend of Ānanda-tāṇḍava. Adhisesha, the serpent who serves as a bed of Lord Vishnu, hears about the Änanda thaandava and yearns to see and enjoy it. Lord Shiva beckons him to assume the saintly form of sage Patanjali and sends him to the Thillai forest, informing him that he will display the dance in due course. Patanjali who meditated in the Himalayas during krita age joins another saint, Vyaghrapada or Pulikaalmuni (Vyagra / Puli meaning "Tiger" and patha / kaal meaning "feet" – referring to the story of how he sought and got the feet and eyesight of a tiger to help climb trees well before dawn to pick flowers for The Lord before the bees visit them). The story of sage Patanjali as well as his great student sage Upamanyu is narrated in both Vishnu Purana as well as Shiva Purana. They move into the Thillai forest and worship Lord Shiva in the form of lingam, a deity worshipped today as Thirumoolataneswarar (Thiru - sri, Moolatanam - primordial or in the nature of a foundation, Eswarar- the Lord). Legends say that Lord Shiva displayed his dance of bliss (the Aananda Thaandavam) - as Nataraja to these two saints on the day of the poosam star in the Tamil month of Thai (January-February).

 

THE ANANDA TANDAVA POSTURE

The Ānanda-tāṇḍava posture of Nataraja represents pancikritya functions of the godhead believed to have created the dynamic force to create the world.

 

- The demon under Lord Nataraja's feet signifies that ignorance is under His feet.

- The fire in His hand (power of destruction) means He is the destroyer of evil.

- The raised hand (Abhaya or Pataka mudra) signifies that He is the savior of all life forms.

- The arc of fire called Thiruvashi or Prabhavati signifies the cosmos and the perpetual motion of the earth.

- The drum in His hand signifies the origin of life forms.

- The lotus pedestal signifies Om, the sound of the universe.

- His right eye, left eye and third eye signify the sun, moon and fire/knowledge, respectively.

- His right earring (makara kundalam) and left earring (sthri kundalam) signify the union of man and woman (right is man, left is woman).

- The crescent moon in His hair signifies benevolence and beauty.

- The flowing of river Ganges through His matted hair signifies eternity of life.

- The dreading of His hair and drape signify the force of His dance.

 

Another notable point of this posture is that it is based on the six point star. Nataraja's head forms the topmost point of the star, while His spreading hair and right hand form the upper side points. His drape and raised left leg form the lower points, and His right leg that rests on the demon Myalagga forms the lowest point. Surrounding this is the arc of fire.

 

RELIGIOUS SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TEMPLE

Pancha Bhoota Stalam (Sanskrit: पन्च भूत स्थल) refers to the five Shiva temples, each representing the manifestation of the five prime elements of nature - land, water, air, sky, fire. Pancha indicates five, Bhoota means elements and Stala means place. All these temples are located in South India with four of these temples at Tamil Nadu and one at Andhra Pradesh. The five elements are believed to be enshrined in the five lingams and each of the lingams representing Lord Shiva in the temple have five different names based on the elements they represent. In the temple, Shiva is said to have manifested himself in the form of sky. The other four manifestations are Prithivi Lingam (representing land) at Ekambareswarar Temple, Appu Lingam (representing Water) at Thiruvanaikaval, Agni Lingam (representing fire) at Annamalaiyar Temple and Vayu Lingam (representing air) at Srikalahasti Temple.

 

Aathara Stala indicates the Shiva temples which are considered to be divine impersonification of Tantric chakras associated with human anatomy. Nataraja temple is called the Anthaga stalam associated with Anthagam - the third eye.

 

Pancha Sabhai refers to the five places where Lord Shiva is said to have displayed His cosmic dance and all these places have stages or ambalams, also known as Sabhai. Apart from Chidambaram which has the Ponna Ambalam - the Golden Hall, the others are the I-Ratthina Ambalam - the Jeweled Hall at Thiruvaalangadu (rathinam – ruby / red jewelled), the Chitra Ambalam - the Painted Hall at Thirukutralam (chitra – painting), the Velli Ambalam - the Silver Hall at Madurai Meenakshi Amman Temple (velli – silver) and the Thaamira Ambalam - the Copper Hall at Nellaiappar Temple, Tirunelveli (Thaamiram – copper).

 

RELIGIOUS WORK AND SAINTS

There is no reference to the temple in Sangam literature of the 1st to 5th centuries and the earliest mention is found in 6th century Tamil literature. The temple and the deity were immortalized in Tamil poetry in the works of Thevaram by three poet saints belonging to the 7th century - Thirugnana Sambanthar, Thirunavukkarasar and Sundaramoorthy Nayanar. Thirugnana Sambanthar has composed 2 songs in praise of the temple, Thirunavukkarasar aka Appar 8 Tevarams in praise of Nataraja and Sundarar 1 song in praise of Nataraja. Sundarar commences his Thiruthondar thogai (the sacred list of Lord Shiva's 63 devotees) paying his respects to the priests of the Thillai temple - "To the devotees of the priests at Thillai, I am a devotee". The works of the first three saints, Thirumurai were stored in palm leaf manuscripts in the temple and were recovered by the Chola King Rajaraja Chola under the guidance of Nambiandarnambi. Manikkavasagar, the 10th century saivite poet has written two works, the first called Tiruvasakam (The sacred utterances) which largely has been sung in Chidambaram and the Thiruchitrambalakkovaiyar (aka Thirukovaiyar), which has been sung entirely in the temple. Manikkavasagar is said to have attained spiritual bliss at Chidambaram. The Chidambaram Mahatmiyam composed during the 12th century explain the subsequent evolution and de-sanskritization.

 

THE CHIDAMBARA RAHASIYAM

During the daily rituals, the Chief priest, of the day, himself in a state of Godliness - Shivohambhava (Shiva - the Lord, in His Sandhi form - Shivo-, aham – me / us, bhava - state of mind), parts the curtain, indicating the withdrawal of ignorance and reveals the space, and The Lord’s presence.

 

The Chidambara Rahasya, is hence representative of that time when one, in total surrender, allows God to intervene and remove our ignorance, even as we get to 'see and experience' His presence and hence - bliss.

Temple administration and daily rituals

 

WORSHIP FORMS

A unique feature of this temple is the bejeweled image of Lord Nataraja as the main deity. It depicts Lord Shiva as the master of Koothu-Bharata Natyam and is one of the few temples where Lord Shiva is represented by an anthropomorphic murthi rather than the classic, anionic Lingam.

 

At Chidambaram, the dancer dominates, not the linga as in other Shiva shrines. The Chitsabha houses a small sphatika(crystal) linga (Chandramoulisvara), believed to be a piece that fell from the crescent adorning Lord Shiva's head and installed by Adi Shankara. The linga is associated with the intangible fifth element, akasha (ether or space), the eternal infinite expanse where the dance of Lord Shiva takes place daily puja is offered to the linga and also to a small gem-carved figure of Ratnasabhapati.

 

Chidambaram offers a combination of the three apects of Shaiva worship - of the form Lord(Nataraja), of the form and the formlessness (linga) and of the formless omnipresence. The last is suggested by a "Chidambara rahasya", a chakra inscribed on a wall and blackened by applying "punugu" (civet) and over which hangs a string of golden bilva (bael) leaves. This can be viewed through the square chinks when the priest draws aside the dark "curtain of ignorance".

 

WORSHIP

The temple is managed and administered hereditarily by the Chidambaram Dikshitar – a class of Vaidika Brahmins whom, legends say, were brought here from Mt. Kailas, by Patanjali, specifically for the performance of the daily rituals and maintenance of the Chidambaram temple.

 

DIKSHITARS

The Dikshithars were supposed to be 3000 were called Tillai Muvayiram. Today they number around 360. These Dikshithars follow the Vedic rituals, unlike the Sivachariyars or Adhisaivars who follow the agamic rituals for the worship of Shiva and they sport a specific lopsided-to-the-left half shaved head. The rituals for the temple were collated from the Vedas and set by Patanjali, who is said to have inducted the Dikshithars into the worship of Lord Shiva as Nataraja. Every married male member of the Dikshithar family gets a turn to perform the rituals at the temple and can serve as the chief priest for the day. Married Dikshithars are also entitled a share of the temple's revenue. Though the temple is said to have been given endowments of almost 20 km2 of fertile land – having been patronized by various rulers for several centuries, it is managed almost entirely by privately run endowments.

 

DAILY RITUALS

The day begins with the chief priest of the day, performing required rituals to purify himself and assume the Shivoham bhava (Shiva-hood), after which he enters the temple to do the daily rituals. The day begins with Lord Shiva's footwear (padukas) brought at 7:00 am from the palliyarai (bedroom) to the sanctum sanctorum in a palanquin accompanied by devotees with cymbals, chimes and drums. The priest then performs the daily rituals with a yajna and a 'Gopujai' (worship of a cow and her calf). Worship (Puja) is done 6 times in a day. Before each puja, the spadika linga (crystal linga) or the semi form state of Lord Shiva is anointed with ghee, milk, curds, rice, sandal paste and holy ash. This is followed by presenting the naivedhyam or offering of freshly prepared food and sweets to the deity and the diparaadhana, a ritual of showing varied and decoratively set lamps, the reciting of Vedas in Sanskrit and the Panchapuranam (a set of 5 poems from a set of 12 works in Tamil – called the panniru thirumurai). The puja ends with the priest parting the curtains of the sanctum sanctorum to reveal the Chidambara Rahasyam (sanctum).

 

Before the 2nd puja, apart from the regular anointing of the crystal linga, a ruby Nataraja deity (the Rathinasabhapathy) is also anointed. The 3rd puja is at around 12.00 noon, after which the temple closes until around 4:30 pm. The 4th puja is performed at 6.00 pm, the 5th at 8:00 pm and the last puja of the day is performed at 10:00 pm, after which Lord Shiva’s footwear is taken in a procession for Him to ‘retire’ for the night. Before the 5th puja at night, the priest performs special rituals at the Chidambara Rahasya, where he anointed the yantra with aromatic substances and offers naivedyam. The last puja, called the arthajaama puja is performed with special fervor. It is believed that the entire divine force of the universe retires into the deity, when he retires for the night.

 

TEMPLE ADMINISTRATION

The Diskshithars one and fully responsible for the administration and pooja. Simply they mentioned their surname as the Sri Natarajar Temple Trustee and Pooja forever. Dikshithars life and temple tied as the nail and flesh relationship.

 

FESTIVALS

A whole year for men is said to be a single day for the gods. Just as six poojas are performed in a day at the sanctum sanctorum, six anointing ceremonies are performed for the principal deity - Nataraja in a year. They are the Marghazhi Thiruvaadhirai (in December-January) indicating the first puja, the fourteenth day after the new moon (chaturdasi) of the month of Masi (February-March) indicating the second pooja, the Chittirai Thiruvonam (in April-May), indicating the third pooja or uchikalam, the Uthiram of Aani (June-July) also called the Aani Thirumanjanam indicating the evening or the fourth puja, the chaturdasi of Aavani (August-September) indicating the fifth puja and the chaturdasi of the month of Puratasi (October-November) indicating the sixth pooja or Arthajama. Of these the Marghazhi Thiruvaadhirai (in December-January) and the Aani Thirumanjanam (in June-July ) are the most important. These are conducted as the key festivals with the main deity being brought outside the sanctum sanctorum in a procession that included a temple car procession followed by a long anointing ceremony. Several hundreds of thousands of people flock the temple to see the anointing ceremony and the ritualistic dance of Shiva when he is taken back to the sanctum sanctorum. Lord Shiva, in his incarnation of Nataraja, is believed to have born on full moon day in the constellation of Ardra, the sixth lunar mansion. Lord Shiva is bathed only 6 times a year, and on the previous night of Ardra, the bath rituals are performed on a grand scale. Pots full of milk, pomegranate juices, coconut water, ghee, oil, sandal paste, curds, holy ashes, and other liquids and solids, considered as sacred offering to the deity are used for the sacred ablution.

 

There are references in Umapathy Sivam's

Kunchithaangristhavam that the Maasi festival also had the Lord being carried out in procession, however this is not in vogue these days.

 

Natyanjali is a prominent festival celebrated during February every year when Bharatnatyam dancers from all over the country converge to present dance offering to Nataraja.

 

HISTORY

Constructed to signify where Tamil Shaivites identify the centre loci of the universe to be, the shrine, dedicated to Lord Shiva, has witnessed several significant events in the history of Tamil Nadu. A powerful legacy of Dravidian art, its structures and sculptures have attracted pilgrims to Chidambaram for over two millennium. The birthplace of Nataraja when Shaivite worship was highly popular during the Sangam period, Chidambaram had gained a reputation for holiness across the continent by the third century CE and the admiration of the Tamilakkam royals of the early Cholas, Chera dynasty and the early Pandyan Kingdom. Built by the early Cholas to one of their family deities - Nataraja-Koothan - it served as the king and queen's state temple and seat of their monarchs' coronations. The Chola royals underlined their non-partisan approach to religious iconography and faith by also patronizing the Srirangam Ranganathaswamy temple dedicated to Vishnu - their other Kuladheivam or "abode of family deity". Chola King Kocengannan who reigned in the first half of the 2nd century CE was born after his parents King Subhadevan and Kamaladevi worshipped in the Thillai Golden Hall (Pon Ambalam). He expanded the shrine in his later life and added to unfinished decorations. Saints Patañjali Tirumular and Vyaghrapada famously worshipped Nataraja at the shrine. The travelling Pallava-Chola king Simhavarman (II or III) who reigned in the 5th-6th century CE was cured of leprosy by bathing in the Shivagangai tank and in gratitude made extensive repairs and additions to the temple. He changed his name to Hiranyavarman or "golden bodied."

 

The Puranas, Sangam literature and the Tirumurai canon join several epigraphs and murals in highlighting the brilliance of the temple site and the devotion of Patañjali, Vyaghrapada-Pulikaalmunivar and patanjali to Nataraja at Thillai. The sthala puranam as well as umapathi sivacharya's koyil puranam give an account of how an ancient chola prince of kritayugam or first of epochal ages. Worshipped The Lord's feet at Chidambaram and being blessed with a vision of His was further helped by saint Vyaghrapada to consecrate a place of worship therewith. The temple murals and some cholan and pandyan literature refer to this sthala puranam. The chidambaram mahatyam as well as koyil puranam by the same author discuss as to how this prince who was presented with dhataki or atti garland and tiger flag in which Lord Indra would take abode to make him ever victorious was blessed with vision of lord and further attained mukti at this spot. This is very credible because all ancient literature and documents report that tiger flag and atti or dhataki (grislea tomentosa) garland as being emblematic with cholas. Some sangam period works also passingly refer to the krita age king's war with demons and his victory against them. The king also went by name Vyaghraketu after being gifted with the tiger flag.

 

Later during the 4th or 5th century CE, a pallava king called Simha Varman who was also a nayanmar saint by name Aiyatikal Kaadavarkon made some compositions and bathed in the tank and attained mukthi at tiru-perum-ppatra-puliyur or chidambaram. Aragalur Udaya Iraratevan Ponparappinan had refurbished most of the parts and rebuilt some parts of the temple around 1213 AD.

 

At periodical intervals (12 years in general), major repairs and renovation works are carried out, new facilities added and consecrated. Most old temples have also 'grown' over periods of time with additional facilities, more outer corridors and new gopurams (pagodas) were added by the rulers who patronized the temple. While this process has helped to keep the temples 'alive' as places of worship, from a purely archeological or historical perspective these renovations have unintentionally lead to destruction of the original works - which were not in sync with the latter and usually grander temple plans.

 

To this general trend, Chidambaram temple is no exception. The origins and developments of the temple are hence largely deduced from allied references in works of literature and poetry, the verbal information passed over generations by the Dikshithar community and from what little, of inscriptions and manuscripts that are available today.

The temple site is very ancient one is known to have been crafted time and again by the ancient craftsmen guild known as Perumthachchans. The reference to the same is available in sangam literature as well as other documents. The tevaram trio in particular have held this site to be of great sanctity with some like Tirugnanasambandar and Sundarar out of devotion being reluctant to set their foot in the place "because it would be an insult to the lord to put one's foot on his abode". The sangam works refer to the temple being favoured by all the three ancient crowns of south, the Neriyan (cholas), chezhiyan (pandyas) and uthiyan (cheras), even if the temple was in what was traditionally chola country.

 

INSCRIPTIONS

There are several inscriptions available in the temple and referring to the Chidambaram temple in neighbouring areas. Most inscriptions available pertain to the periods of Cholas - Rajaraja Chola I (985-1014 CE), Rajendra Chola I (1012-1044 CE), Kulothunga Chola I (1070-1120 CE), Vikrama Chola (1118-1135 CE), Rajadhiraja Chola II (1163 -1178 CE), Kulothunga Chola III (1178-1218 CE) and Rajaraja Chola III (1216-1256 CE). Pandya inscriptions date from Thribhuvana Chakravarthi Veerapandiyan, Jataavarman Thribhuvana Chakravarthi Sundarapaandiyan (1251-1268 CE) and Maaravarman Thribhuvana Chakravarthi Veerakeralanaagiya Kulashekara Pandiyan (1268-1308 CE). Pallava inscriptions are available for king Avani Aala Pirandhaan Ko-pperum-Singha (1216-1242 CE). Vijayanagara Kings mentioned in inscriptions are Veeraprathaapa Kiruttina Theva Mahaaraayar (1509-1529 CE), Veeraprathaapa Venkata Deva Mahaaraayar, Sri Ranga Theva Mahaaraayar, Atchyutha Deva Mahaaraayar (1529-1542 CE) and Veera Bhooopathiraayar. One of the inscriptions from the descendant of Cheramaan Perumal nayanar, Ramavarma Maharaja has been found.

 

KUMBHABISHEKAM 2015

The sacred Chidambaram Sri Sabanayagar Temple, which is also described as Boologa Kailaasam and Chithakasam

 

Sri Sivagamasundari Samaedha Sriman Anandha Nataraja Moorthy's Chitsabha Samprokshana Chithvilasa Maha Kumbhabishekam is about to happen in a great way On the auspicious day of Manmadha (Tamil) year Chithirai month 18th day (01-May-2015) Friday morning between 7:00 am and 8:30 am Hastha Nakshthra, Thrayodhasi Thithi, Amirtha yoga, Rishabha Lagna.

 

INVASIONS

The temple was severely vandalised during Malik Kafur's invasions of South India between 1311 and 1325. A garrison was set up within the temple precincts and the walls were fortified during the Carnatic Wars between the East India Company and the French and the Anglo-Mysore Wars that the British fought with Hyder Ali and Tipu Sultan.

 

WIKIPEDIA

As a general rule, I like Dennis Trident ALX400s, buuuuut 18320 is by far my least favourite Lincoln one. At this point you're probably expecting me to say it's because of the white part below the windscreen, and while that might have some bearing on it, it's not the main reason.

 

Up until early 2021 I didn't see all that much of 18320, but then for pretty much the first five months of that year I ended up spotting 18320 loads and what felt like very little else, so much so I got completely sick of the sight of it. Since then its omnipresence has just made it really, really boring to me, not helped by the fact I've seen barely anything of Lincoln's three other 05 plate ALXs this autumn. And 18320 has a really crappy exterior at the moment, too, so it doesn't even look nice.

 

In fact I'm so bored of it, I eagerly await the day it gets painted in Local livery.

 

Lincoln bus station, 7.10.22

Scenery captured on Tuesday January 24, 2012 @ 18:04:56 hrs.

Scenery captured through the window of my residence's dining room.

My eyes are lifted up to the hills: O where will my help come from?

De toutes les églises de Rome, une seule est considérée comme étant la « mère et tête de toutes les églises » : la basilique Saint-Jean de Latran, cathédrale de Rome, siège du diocèse de la Ville.

 

Cette église fondamentale du Catholicisme est propriété du Saint-Siège et fait donc partie du Vatican (même si elle ne se trouve pas sur le territoire du Vatican). C’est une des quatre basiliques majeures de Rome, et ne l’est pas que par la taille : 12 conciles y eurent lieu, dont 5 œcuméniques tout au long du Moyen-âge et de la Renaissance (1123, 1139, 1179, 1215 et de 1512 à 1516). C’est aussi au Latran que Charlemagne se fit baptiser, à Pâques en 774, ou que les fameux accords entre l’Eglise et l’Etat furent signés en 1929, les accords du Latran.

L’Archibasilique du Très Saint-Sauveur, plus connue sous le nom de Basilique de Saint-Jean de Latran, est l’église la plus ancienne de la ville, construite avant même Saint Pierre de Rome. L’empereur Constantin Ier (306-337) l’a fit construire, selon la légende, après avoir guéri d’une maladie en 313, et sera consacrée en 324 par le pape Sylvestre Ier. C’est l’église utilisée par le pape, lorsqu’il assume le rôle d’évêque de la Ville Éternelle. Elle est bâtie sur les anciens terrains d’une ancienne famille patricienne, les Laterani, qui donnèrent ainsi leur nom à l’église, Latran. Sainte Hélène, la mère de Constantin, chrétienne très fervente, avait fait cadeau des terrains au pape de l’époque, Melchiade.

Avant le renouveau de Saint-Pierre de Rome, à la Renaissance, le siège de la Chrétienté était au Latran. Pendant 1000 ans, du IVe au XIVe siècle, le pape y avait sa résidence, son siège, jusqu’à l’« exil » de Clément V à Avignon, en 1309. L’ancienne résidence papale est encore visible, le Palais de Latran, que l’on peut voir collé à la basilique, reconverti en musée par le pape Grégoire XVI. L’église avec tant de reconstructions, eu forcément des besoins financiers importants. Les rois de France contribuèrent au financement, depuis Louis XI au XVe siècle, de façon plus ou moins régulière suivant les aléas de l’Histoire, jusqu’en 1871. Henri IV, en échange de l’assurance des revenus provenant de l’Abbaye de Clairac pour le Latran, fut remercié avec une statue que l’on peut encore voir de nos jours, et le dirigeant français fut fait chanoine d’honneur. Aujourd’hui, le Président de la République, quel qu’il soit est ainsi systématiquement fait chanoine d’honneur de la basilique Saint-Jean de Latran.

L’église que nous pouvons admirer aujourd’hui date du XVIIe siècle, sous le pontificat d’Urbain V, et est la deuxième plus grande église de Rome, avec ses 130m de long. La façade blanche réalisée entre 1732 et 1735, toute en travertin, fut conçue par le Florentin Alessandro Galilei, avec les statues monumentales en son sommet. Ces statues de 7m de haut représentent Jésus, Saint Jean et Saint Jean-Baptiste, ainsi que les docteurs de l’église. La gigantesque porte de bronze est une porte antique, qui n’est autre que celle de l’ancienne Curie romaine ! Sur le fronton, nous pouvons y lire « omnium urbis et orbis ecclesiarum mater et caput », mère et tête de toutes les églises de la ville et du monde.

 

La structure intérieure de la basilique est l’œuvre de Francesco Borromini, exécutée en style baroque. Les travaux débutèrent lors de l’année sainte, le Jubilé de 1650, commandés par le pape Innocent X. Des 14 arcades originelles, il passa à 5, retravaillant ainsi totalement l’espace intérieur de la basilique, qui retrouva l’esprit de l’édifice antique, avec ses 5 nefs. Dans chaque niche de la nef, longue de 130m, nous pouvons voir les statues des apôtres qui regardent les fidèles venus à l’église. Ces statues furent sculptées entre 1703 et 1719. Les chapelles latérales sont également issues du génie de Borromini. Le jeu de lumières que Borromini a su créer est bluffant, avec la lumière qui rentre par les fenêtres, tels des puits de lumière. Cette lumière si spéciale renforce le coté sacré de cet endroit. Borromini conservera le sol, venu du Moyen-âge, et le plafond, en caissons peints et moulures dorées, du bois sculpté du XVIe siècle.

Le sol de la basilique mérite toute l’attention du monde. C’est un sol que l’on nomme de « cosmatesque ». Ce type de sol, fait d’innombrables morceaux de marbre, était typique de l’Italie du Moyen-âge, friande de ce type de mosaïque. Le nom vient de Laurent Cosma et de sa famille, les Cosmati, des artisans qui créèrent bon nombre de ces œuvres, en prélevant le marbre des ruines romaines antiques. Ces sols sont absolument splendides, m’impressionnant beaucoup plus que toutes les statues de l’église : on n’a pas l’habitude de marcher sur quelque chose de si beau, et son omniprésence donne cet aspect chaleureux à Saint Jean de Latran, bien différent des sols en pierre des cathédrales gothiques.

 

Of all the churches in Rome, only one is considered the "mother and head of all churches": the Basilica of St. John Lateran, cathedral of Rome, seat of the diocese of the City.

 

This fundamental church of Catholicism is property of the Holy See and therefore part of the Vatican (even if it is not located on Vatican territory). It is one of the four major basilicas of Rome, and it is not only because of the size: 12 councils took place, including 5 ecumenical throughout the Middle Ages and the Renaissance (1123, 1139, 1179, 1215 and from 1512 to 1516). It is also in the Lateran that Charlemagne was baptized, at Easter in 774, or that the famous agreements between the Church and the State were signed in 1929, the Lateran agreements.

The Archibasilica of the Most Holy Savior, better known as the Basilica of St. John Lateran, is the oldest church in the city, built even before St. Peter of Rome. Emperor Constantine I (306-337) had it built, according to legend, after curing a disease in 313, and will be consecrated in 324 by Pope Sylvester I. This is the church used by the pope when he assumes the role of bishop of the Eternal City. It is built on the old grounds of an old patrician family, the Laterani, which gave their name to the church, Lateran. St. Helena, the mother of Constantine, a very fervent Christian, had given the land to the pope of the time, Melchiade.

Before the revival of St. Peter's in Rome, during the Renaissance, the siege of Christendom was at the Lateran. For 1000 years, from the fourth to the fourteenth century, the pope had his residence, his seat, until the "exile" of Clement V in Avignon, in 1309. The former papal residence is still visible, the Lateran Palace , which can be seen stuck to the basilica, converted into a museum by Pope Gregory XVI. The church with so many reconstructions, had necessarily important financial needs. The kings of France contributed to the financing, since Louis XI in the 15th century, in a more or less regular way according to the vagaries of the History, until 1871. Henry IV, in exchange for the insurance of the revenues coming from the Abbey from Clairac to the Lateran, was thanked with a statue that can still be seen today, and the French leader was made canon of honor. Today, the President of the Republic, whoever he is is thus systematically made canon of honor of the basilica Saint-Jean of Lateran.

The church that we can admire today dates from the seventeenth century, under the pontificate of Urban V, and is the second largest church in Rome, with its 130m long. The white facade built between 1732 and 1735, all travertine, was designed by the Florentine Alessandro Galilei, with the monumental statues at the top. These statues 7m high represent Jesus, Saint John and Saint John the Baptist, as well as the doctors of the church. The gigantic bronze door is an ancient door, which is none other than that of the ancient Roman Curia! On the pediment, we can read "omnium urbis and orbis ecclesiarum mater and caput", mother and head of all the churches of the city and the world.

The inner structure of the basilica is the work of Francesco Borromini, executed in Baroque style. Work began during the holy year, the Jubilee of 1650, commissioned by Pope Innocent X. Of the 14 original arcades, he went to 5, thus completely reworking the interior space of the basilica, which found the spirit of the ancient building, with its 5 naves. In each niche of the nave, 130m long, we can see the statues of the apostles who watch the faithful coming to the church. These statues were carved between 1703 and 1719. The side chapels are also from the genius of Borromini. The play of lights that Borromini has created is stunning, with the light coming in through the windows, like skylights. This special light reinforces the sacred side of this place. Borromini will preserve the soil, from the Middle Ages, and the ceiling, in painted boxes and gilded moldings, carved wood of the sixteenth century.

The basilica floor deserves all the attention of the world. It is a soil that we call "cosmatesque". This type of floor, made of innumerable pieces of marble, was typical of medieval Italy, fond of this type of mosaic. The name comes from Laurent Cosma and his family, the Cosmati, craftsmen who created many of these works, taking marble from the ancient Roman ruins. These soils are absolutely splendid, impressing me much more than all the statues of the church: we are not used to walking on something so beautiful, and its omnipresence gives this warm aspect to Saint Jean de Latran, very different from the stone floors of Gothic cathedrals.

 

De toutes les églises de Rome, une seule est considérée comme étant la « mère et tête de toutes les églises » : la basilique Saint-Jean de Latran, cathédrale de Rome, siège du diocèse de la Ville.

 

Cette église fondamentale du Catholicisme est propriété du Saint-Siège et fait donc partie du Vatican (même si elle ne se trouve pas sur le territoire du Vatican). C’est une des quatre basiliques majeures de Rome, et ne l’est pas que par la taille : 12 conciles y eurent lieu, dont 5 œcuméniques tout au long du Moyen-âge et de la Renaissance (1123, 1139, 1179, 1215 et de 1512 à 1516). C’est aussi au Latran que Charlemagne se fit baptiser, à Pâques en 774, ou que les fameux accords entre l’Eglise et l’Etat furent signés en 1929, les accords du Latran.

L’Archibasilique du Très Saint-Sauveur, plus connue sous le nom de Basilique de Saint-Jean de Latran, est l’église la plus ancienne de la ville, construite avant même Saint Pierre de Rome. L’empereur Constantin Ier (306-337) l’a fit construire, selon la légende, après avoir guéri d’une maladie en 313, et sera consacrée en 324 par le pape Sylvestre Ier. C’est l’église utilisée par le pape, lorsqu’il assume le rôle d’évêque de la Ville Éternelle. Elle est bâtie sur les anciens terrains d’une ancienne famille patricienne, les Laterani, qui donnèrent ainsi leur nom à l’église, Latran. Sainte Hélène, la mère de Constantin, chrétienne très fervente, avait fait cadeau des terrains au pape de l’époque, Melchiade.

Avant le renouveau de Saint-Pierre de Rome, à la Renaissance, le siège de la Chrétienté était au Latran. Pendant 1000 ans, du IVe au XIVe siècle, le pape y avait sa résidence, son siège, jusqu’à l’« exil » de Clément V à Avignon, en 1309. L’ancienne résidence papale est encore visible, le Palais de Latran, que l’on peut voir collé à la basilique, reconverti en musée par le pape Grégoire XVI. L’église avec tant de reconstructions, eu forcément des besoins financiers importants. Les rois de France contribuèrent au financement, depuis Louis XI au XVe siècle, de façon plus ou moins régulière suivant les aléas de l’Histoire, jusqu’en 1871. Henri IV, en échange de l’assurance des revenus provenant de l’Abbaye de Clairac pour le Latran, fut remercié avec une statue que l’on peut encore voir de nos jours, et le dirigeant français fut fait chanoine d’honneur. Aujourd’hui, le Président de la République, quel qu’il soit est ainsi systématiquement fait chanoine d’honneur de la basilique Saint-Jean de Latran.

L’église que nous pouvons admirer aujourd’hui date du XVIIe siècle, sous le pontificat d’Urbain V, et est la deuxième plus grande église de Rome, avec ses 130m de long. La façade blanche réalisée entre 1732 et 1735, toute en travertin, fut conçue par le Florentin Alessandro Galilei, avec les statues monumentales en son sommet. Ces statues de 7m de haut représentent Jésus, Saint Jean et Saint Jean-Baptiste, ainsi que les docteurs de l’église. La gigantesque porte de bronze est une porte antique, qui n’est autre que celle de l’ancienne Curie romaine ! Sur le fronton, nous pouvons y lire « omnium urbis et orbis ecclesiarum mater et caput », mère et tête de toutes les églises de la ville et du monde.

 

La structure intérieure de la basilique est l’œuvre de Francesco Borromini, exécutée en style baroque. Les travaux débutèrent lors de l’année sainte, le Jubilé de 1650, commandés par le pape Innocent X. Des 14 arcades originelles, il passa à 5, retravaillant ainsi totalement l’espace intérieur de la basilique, qui retrouva l’esprit de l’édifice antique, avec ses 5 nefs. Dans chaque niche de la nef, longue de 130m, nous pouvons voir les statues des apôtres qui regardent les fidèles venus à l’église. Ces statues furent sculptées entre 1703 et 1719. Les chapelles latérales sont également issues du génie de Borromini. Le jeu de lumières que Borromini a su créer est bluffant, avec la lumière qui rentre par les fenêtres, tels des puits de lumière. Cette lumière si spéciale renforce le coté sacré de cet endroit. Borromini conservera le sol, venu du Moyen-âge, et le plafond, en caissons peints et moulures dorées, du bois sculpté du XVIe siècle.

Le sol de la basilique mérite toute l’attention du monde. C’est un sol que l’on nomme de « cosmatesque ». Ce type de sol, fait d’innombrables morceaux de marbre, était typique de l’Italie du Moyen-âge, friande de ce type de mosaïque. Le nom vient de Laurent Cosma et de sa famille, les Cosmati, des artisans qui créèrent bon nombre de ces œuvres, en prélevant le marbre des ruines romaines antiques. Ces sols sont absolument splendides, m’impressionnant beaucoup plus que toutes les statues de l’église : on n’a pas l’habitude de marcher sur quelque chose de si beau, et son omniprésence donne cet aspect chaleureux à Saint Jean de Latran, bien différent des sols en pierre des cathédrales gothiques.

 

Of all the churches in Rome, only one is considered the "mother and head of all churches": the Basilica of St. John Lateran, cathedral of Rome, seat of the diocese of the City.

 

This fundamental church of Catholicism is property of the Holy See and therefore part of the Vatican (even if it is not located on Vatican territory). It is one of the four major basilicas of Rome, and it is not only because of the size: 12 councils took place, including 5 ecumenical throughout the Middle Ages and the Renaissance (1123, 1139, 1179, 1215 and from 1512 to 1516). It is also in the Lateran that Charlemagne was baptized, at Easter in 774, or that the famous agreements between the Church and the State were signed in 1929, the Lateran agreements.

The Archibasilica of the Most Holy Savior, better known as the Basilica of St. John Lateran, is the oldest church in the city, built even before St. Peter of Rome. Emperor Constantine I (306-337) had it built, according to legend, after curing a disease in 313, and will be consecrated in 324 by Pope Sylvester I. This is the church used by the pope when he assumes the role of bishop of the Eternal City. It is built on the old grounds of an old patrician family, the Laterani, which gave their name to the church, Lateran. St. Helena, the mother of Constantine, a very fervent Christian, had given the land to the pope of the time, Melchiade.

Before the revival of St. Peter's in Rome, during the Renaissance, the siege of Christendom was at the Lateran. For 1000 years, from the fourth to the fourteenth century, the pope had his residence, his seat, until the "exile" of Clement V in Avignon, in 1309. The former papal residence is still visible, the Lateran Palace , which can be seen stuck to the basilica, converted into a museum by Pope Gregory XVI. The church with so many reconstructions, had necessarily important financial needs. The kings of France contributed to the financing, since Louis XI in the 15th century, in a more or less regular way according to the vagaries of the History, until 1871. Henry IV, in exchange for the insurance of the revenues coming from the Abbey from Clairac to the Lateran, was thanked with a statue that can still be seen today, and the French leader was made canon of honor. Today, the President of the Republic, whoever he is is thus systematically made canon of honor of the basilica Saint-Jean of Lateran.

The church that we can admire today dates from the seventeenth century, under the pontificate of Urban V, and is the second largest church in Rome, with its 130m long. The white facade built between 1732 and 1735, all travertine, was designed by the Florentine Alessandro Galilei, with the monumental statues at the top. These statues 7m high represent Jesus, Saint John and Saint John the Baptist, as well as the doctors of the church. The gigantic bronze door is an ancient door, which is none other than that of the ancient Roman Curia! On the pediment, we can read "omnium urbis and orbis ecclesiarum mater and caput", mother and head of all the churches of the city and the world.

The inner structure of the basilica is the work of Francesco Borromini, executed in Baroque style. Work began during the holy year, the Jubilee of 1650, commissioned by Pope Innocent X. Of the 14 original arcades, he went to 5, thus completely reworking the interior space of the basilica, which found the spirit of the ancient building, with its 5 naves. In each niche of the nave, 130m long, we can see the statues of the apostles who watch the faithful coming to the church. These statues were carved between 1703 and 1719. The side chapels are also from the genius of Borromini. The play of lights that Borromini has created is stunning, with the light coming in through the windows, like skylights. This special light reinforces the sacred side of this place. Borromini will preserve the soil, from the Middle Ages, and the ceiling, in painted boxes and gilded moldings, carved wood of the sixteenth century.

The basilica floor deserves all the attention of the world. It is a soil that we call "cosmatesque". This type of floor, made of innumerable pieces of marble, was typical of medieval Italy, fond of this type of mosaic. The name comes from Laurent Cosma and his family, the Cosmati, craftsmen who created many of these works, taking marble from the ancient Roman ruins. These soils are absolutely splendid, impressing me much more than all the statues of the church: we are not used to walking on something so beautiful, and its omnipresence gives this warm aspect to Saint Jean de Latran, very different from the stone floors of Gothic cathedrals.

 

Gabriele Münter 1877-1962 Munich

House in the Park, Sèvres

Maison dans le Parc, Sèvres 1906

Musée d'Art Moderne de Louisiana

Exposition temporaire Temporary exhibition

 

L'ESQUISSE ou L'ART DU FLOU

 

L'Art Moderne, annoncé bien avant le début du 20è siècle par les pré-impressionnistes, les impressionnistes et les post-impressionnistes, a été un facteur tout à fait remarquable de renouvellement des formes, dans la peinture européenne.

L'Art a toujours été, une manière de rêver le monde réel. Mais les nouvelles techniques de l'Art Moderne, s'éloignent toutes, de manière très intentionnelle, volontariste, de la représentation exacte du réel.

Les peintres tendent à créer un art dans lequel l'interprétation du réel l'emporte sur sa reproduction.

L'artiste moderne ne reproduit plus guère le réel, il le rêve, ou l'invente. Ces tendances ont abouti à l'art non figuratif, autrement appelé l'art abstrait.

Ce renouvellement des formes en peinture a apporté de nouvelles possibilités, très intéressantes, et très belles, d'expression artistique.

Parmi les techniques développées au cours du 19è siècle l'Esquisse a été une des meilleures expressions de l'Art du Flou.

L'Art du Flou a été pratiqué de manière géniale par Léonard de Vinci. Le "Sfumato" est, dans le cadre d'une peinture très figurative et parfaitement finie, comme la Joconde, les Vierges au rocher, ou Saint Jean Baptiste, une ébauche d'art du flou.

L'Esquisse a été dans l'histoire de la peinture un projet, une étude préparatoire, qui permettait à l'artiste de s'assurer de la cohérence et de l'équilibre de son tableau fini. Dans ce cas, le plus souvent, le flou n'est qu'une approximation, un brouillon, le témoin d'un art incomplet qui demande à être achevé.

Mais de nombreux artistes, au cours des siècles passés, ont parfaitement compris que l'esquisse pouvait, parfois, exceptionnellement, être une oeuvre achevée.

C'est à dire une oeuvre dont une grande majorité de spectateurs, experts ou non, ressentaient impérieusement que RIEN ne devait lui être ajoutée. Ce n'est pas une définition mathématique, mais c'est la meilleure.

L'esquisse n'est une oeuvre achevée que lorsqu'elle est créatrice d'une atmosphère singulière, particulièrement suggestive, porteuse d'une poésie qui lui est propre, unique. Quand il apparaît de manière évidente que plus de précision dans le dessin fermerait les portes à l'imaginaire, au mystère, et détruirait un équilibre subtile entre le rêve et la réalité.

Le dessin trop précis peut en effet fermer les portes à l'imaginaire, alors que le flou qui caractérise l'esquisse peut les ouvrir. Les photographes le savent bien aussi : Le flou peut être simplement flou, mais il peut aussi être une invitation à ressentir un mystère et à participer à une énigme. Le spectateur est invité à meubler par son imagination le flou qui lui est proposé.

Mais c'est une alchimie dont seuls les grands artistes, peuvent, exceptionnellement, pénétrer le secret.

Le grand maître de cette technique, et celui qui, le plus précocement, l'a poussé le plus loin, a été sans doute William Turner (1775-1851).

Delacroix a été aussi, un peu après Turner, un des grands précurseurs de l'art de l'esquisse. Par exemple dans la "mort de Sadarnapale" mais aussi dans bien d'autres tableaux. Mais Delacroix est aussi un exemple des limites de cette technique. Toutes les techniques rencontrent, à un moment ou à un autre, leurs limites.

L'Art de l'esquisse est redoutablement difficile, car il ne suffit pas de dessiner schématiquement un sujet pour faire une belle oeuvre. De même qu'en photographie de nos jours, il ne suffit pas de dessiner et de peindre flou pour créer une oeuvre d'art.

L'Europe a découvert avec les romantiques (Delacroix, Turner Constable) et les impressionnistes l'art de l'esquisse et ses charmes particuliers, mais nous voyons de nos jours de l'esquisse à profusion, au point que l'on peut poser la question : Et si on revenait, aussi, à de la peinture finie, comme celle des artistes du MEAM de Barcelone ? Combien d'artistes depuis les impressionnistes on fait de l'esquisse par facilité ?! En fait pour être capable de peindre une esquisse vraiment artistique, il faut être capable de peindre un tableau bien dessiné, totalement achevé et peint, et d'y ajouter une beauté indéfinissable, en ne le finissant pas ! Ce n'est pas donné à tout le monde.

Le flou peut n'être qu'une esquisse ou une approximation, dont finalement la valeur marchande ne tient qu'à la signature d'un grand nom.

Il est vrai que l'esquisse peut dégager une certaine puissance expressive, avoir une puissance évocatrice, une poésie de l'inachevé. Une force expressive que le tableau, bien fini, bien dessiné et bien peint, achevé, peut effectivement perdre. Mais la magie poétique de l'art du flou ne peut pas être systématique.

Le flou, c'est aussi beaucoup une question de mode. Une habitude du regard. Une culture.

L'esthétique de notre époque est un peu trop focalisée sur l'esquisse.

On finit par ne plus voir que des esquisses dans les galeries de peintures modernes ou contemporaines.

En réalité les artistes ne sont pas les seuls responsables de cette situation. Au 19è siècle la société occidentale est entrée dans une culture qui fait de la réussite, matérielle, économique, et de l'Argent ses valeurs principales. Dès lors des esquisses, qui ne seraient pas sorties des brouillons personnels de l'artiste, pendant les siècles précédents, sont devenues de marchandises sources de profits. Ces marchandises, se trouvent même dans les musées. Picasso avait très bien compris ce mécanisme économique.

Bien sûr cette évolution est habillée de Grands Principes : Il n'est pas question d'Argent, mais de l'Artiste, de la Liberté de Création, du Progrès des Arts, d'une "sensibilité nouvelle", de "vivre avec son temps" etc...

Cette omniprésence de l'esquisse reflète non seulement des habitudes du regard mais des valeurs éthiques. L'Art du Flou est devenu aussi l'Art de faire, vite, de l'Argent.

Valeurs morales positives ou négatives. Nous vivons dans un monde un peu trop pressé !! Pour aller où ?

  

THE SKETCH OR THE ART OF BLUR

  

Modern Art, announced well before the beginning of the 20th century by the pré-impressionnists, impressionists and post-impressionists, was a factor quite remarkable renewal forms in European painting.

Art has always been a way to dream the real world. But the new techniques of modern art, are moving away all so very intentional, deliberate, of the exact representation of reality.

The painters tend to create an art in which the interpretation of reality trumps its reproduction.

The modern artist is hardly reproduces reality, it's dream or invent. These trends have resulted in non-figurative art, also called abstract art.

This renewal forms in painting is total. He brought new possibilities of artistic expression.

Among the techniques developed during the 19th century, the sketch was one of the best expressions of the Art of Blur.

The Art of Blur has been practiced ingeniously by Leonardo da Vinci. The "Sfumato" is in the context of a very figurative and perfectly finished painting, like the Mona Lisa, the Virgin on the rock, or John the Baptist, a draft of art of blur..

The sketch was in the history of painting, a project, a preparatory study, which allowed the artist to ensure the coherence and balance of the finished table. In this case, usually, the blur is only an approximation, a preform, a draft, witnessed an incomplete art which needs to be completed.

But many artists, over the centuries, have understood perfectly that the sketch was sometimes, exceptionally, be a finished work.

That is to say a work, of which a large majority of spectators, experts or not, imperiously felt that NOTHING was to be added to it. This is not a mathematical definition, but this is the best.

The sketch is a finished work, only when it is creative, from a singular atmosphere, particularly suggestive, carrying a single poetry. When he appears, with evidence, that more precision in drawing, closes the doors to the imagination, of the mystery, and destroy a subtle balance between dream and reality.

The tto precise drawing can, in fact, close the doors to the imagination. While the blur, characteristic of the sketch, can open these doors. The photographers also know well: The blur can be simply fuzzy, but it can also be an invitation to feel a mystery and to participate in an enigma. The viewer is invited to furnish the blur proposed to him, through his imagination.

But it is an alchemy that only great artists have exceptionally found the secret.

The great master of this technique that the earliest, pushed him, foremost, was William Turner (1775-1851).

Delacroix was also a little after Turner, one of the major precursors of the art of the sketch. For example in the "death of Sadarnapale" but also in many other paintings. But Delacroix is also an example of the limitations of this technique. All techniques meet, at one time or another, their limits.

The Art of the sketch is terribly difficult, because it is not enough to draw schematically a subject to make a beautiful work. It is not enough to draw and paint blur, or photographing blur, to create a work of art.

Europe has discovered with the Romantics (Delacroix, Turner Constable) and the Impressionists the art of sketching and its particular charms, but today we see the sketch in profusion, to the point that we can ask the question: What if we came back to finished the painting, like the artists of the MEAM from Barcelona? How many artists since the Impressionists have sketched for ease ?! In fact, to be able to paint a really artistic sketch, one must be able to paint a well-designed, completely finished and painted picture, and add an indefinable beauty to it, by not finishing it! It's not given for everyone.

The blur can be only a sketch or an approximation, which ultimately market value is up to the signing of a big name.

It is true that the sketch can release a certain expressive power, have an evocative power, a poetry of unfinished. An expressive force that the painting, well finished, well designed and well painted, completed, can actually lose. But the poetic magic of Blur Art cannot be systematic.

It is also very much a question of fashion. A habit of look. A culture.

The aesthetics of our time is a little too focused on the sketch.

We finally see only sketches in the galleries of modern and contemporary paintings.

In fact the artists are not the solely responsibles, for this situation. In the 19th century Western society has entered a culture that makes of the success, physical, material, economic, and of money, its main values. Therefore the sketches, which would not come out of personal drafts of the artist, in previous centuries, have become merchandises, and sources of profits. These goods are found even in museums. Picasso understood very well, what economic mechanism.

Of course this evolution is dressed in Great Principles: There is no question of Money, but of the Artist, of the Freedom of Creation,of the Progress of the Arts, of a "new sensibility", "to live with her time "etc ...

This omnipresence of the sketch reflects not only the look but the habits of ethical values.

positive or negative moral values. The Art of the blur has also become the Art to do, quickly, of the money.

We live in a world too pressed !! To go where ?

   

André Derain 1880-1954 Paris

Gitan Gipsy 1936

Musée d'Art Moderne de la Ville de Paris (Palais de Tokyo)

  

DE L'ESQUISSE ET DE L'ART DU FLOU A L'ART BÂCLÉ

  

" Mais Robert, vous faites des esquisses depuis si longtemps, ne pourriez vous terminer un tableau ?".

Denis Diderot (1713-1784) à Hubert Robert (1733-1808)

 

"But Robert, you've been doing sketches for so long, could not you finish a painting?"

Denis Diderot (1713-1784) to Hubert Robert (1733-1808)

 

L'Art Moderne, annoncé bien avant le début du 20è siècle par les pré-impressionnistes, les impressionnistes et les post-impressionnistes, a été un facteur tout à fait remarquable de renouvellement des formes, dans la peinture européenne.

L'Art a toujours été, une manière de rêver le monde réel. Mais les nouvelles techniques de l'Art Moderne, s'éloignent toutes, de manière très intentionnelle, volontariste, de la représentation exacte du réel.

Les peintres tendent à créer un art dans lequel l'interprétation du réel l'emporte sur sa reproduction.

L'artiste moderne ne reproduit plus guère le réel, il le rêve, ou l'invente. Ces tendances ont abouti à l'art non figuratif, autrement appelé l'art abstrait.

Ce renouvellement des formes en peinture a apporté de nouvelles possibilités, très intéressantes, et très belles, d'expression artistique.

Parmi les techniques développées au cours du 19è siècle l'Esquisse a été une des meilleures expressions de l'Art du Flou.

L'Art du Flou a été pratiqué de manière géniale par Léonard de Vinci. Le "Sfumato" est, dans le cadre d'une peinture très figurative et parfaitement finie, comme la Joconde, les Vierges au rocher, ou Saint Jean Baptiste, une ébauche d'art du flou.

Mais l'Esquisse a été surtout dans l'histoire de la peinture un projet, une étude préparatoire, qui permettait à l'artiste de s'assurer de la cohérence et de l'équilibre de son tableau fini. Dans ce cas, le plus souvent, le flou n'est qu'une approximation, un brouillon, le témoin d'un art incomplet qui demande à être achevé.

Mais de nombreux artistes, au cours des siècles passés, ont parfaitement compris que l'esquisse pouvait, parfois, exceptionnellement, être une oeuvre achevée.

C'est à dire une oeuvre dont une grande majorité de spectateurs, experts ou non, ressentaient impérieusement que RIEN ne devait lui être ajoutée. Ce n'est pas une définition mathématique, mais c'est la meilleure.

L'esquisse n'est une oeuvre achevée que lorsqu'elle est créatrice d'une atmosphère singulière, particulièrement suggestive, porteuse d'une poésie qui lui est propre, unique. Quand il apparaît de manière évidente que plus de précision dans le dessin fermerait les portes à l'imaginaire, au mystère, et détruirait un équilibre subtile entre le rêve et la réalité.

Le dessin trop précis peut en effet fermer les portes à l'imaginaire, alors que le flou qui caractérise l'esquisse peut les ouvrir. Les photographes le savent bien aussi : Le flou peut être simplement flou, mais il peut aussi être une invitation à ressentir un mystère et à participer à une énigme. Le spectateur est invité à meubler par son imagination le flou qui lui est proposé.

Mais c'est une alchimie dont seuls les grands artistes, peuvent, exceptionnellement, pénétrer le secret.

Le grand maître de cette technique, et celui qui, le plus précocement, l'a poussé le plus loin, a été sans doute William Turner (1775-1851).

Delacroix a été aussi, un peu après Turner, un des grands précurseurs de l'art de l'esquisse. Par exemple dans la "mort de Sadarnapale" mais aussi dans bien d'autres tableaux. Mais Delacroix est aussi un exemple des limites de cette technique. Toutes les techniques rencontrent, à un moment ou à un autre, leurs limites.

L'Art de l'esquisse est redoutablement difficile, car il ne suffit pas de dessiner schématiquement un sujet pour faire une belle oeuvre. De même qu'en photographie de nos jours, il ne suffit pas de dessiner et de peindre flou pour créer une oeuvre d'art.

L'Europe a découvert avec les romantiques (Delacroix, Turner Constable) et les impressionnistes l'art de l'esquisse et ses charmes particuliers, mais nous voyons de nos jours de l'esquisse à profusion, au point que l'on peut poser la question : Et si on revenait, aussi, à de la peinture finie, comme celle des artistes du MEAM de Barcelone ? Combien d'artistes depuis les impressionnistes on fait de l'esquisse par facilité ?! En fait pour être capable de peindre une esquisse vraiment artistique, il faut être capable de peindre un tableau bien dessiné, totalement achevé et peint, et d'y ajouter une beauté indéfinissable, en ne le finissant pas ! Ce n'est pas donné à tout le monde.

Le flou peut n'être qu'une esquisse ou une approximation, dont finalement la valeur marchande ne tient qu'à la signature d'un grand nom.

Il est vrai que l'esquisse peut dégager une certaine puissance expressive, avoir une puissance évocatrice, une poésie de l'inachevé. Une force expressive que le tableau, bien fini, bien dessiné et bien peint, achevé, peut effectivement perdre. Mais la magie poétique de l'art du flou ne peut pas être systématique.

Le flou, c'est aussi beaucoup une question de mode. Une habitude du regard. Une culture.

L'esthétique de notre époque est un peu trop focalisée sur l'esquisse.

On finit par ne plus voir que des esquisses dans les galeries de peintures modernes ou contemporaines.

En réalité les artistes ne sont pas les seuls responsables de cette situation. Au 19è siècle la société occidentale est entrée dans une culture qui fait de la réussite, matérielle, économique, et de l'Argent ses valeurs principales. Dès lors des esquisses, qui ne seraient pas sorties des brouillons personnels de l'artiste, pendant les siècles précédents, sont devenues de marchandises sources de profits. Ces marchandises, se trouvent même dans les musées. Picasso avait très bien compris ce mécanisme économique.

Bien sûr cette évolution est habillée de Grands Principes : Il n'est pas question d'Argent, mais de l'Artiste, de la Liberté de Création, du Progrès des Arts, d'une "sensibilité nouvelle", de "vivre avec son temps" etc...

Cette omniprésence de l'esquisse reflète non seulement des habitudes du regard mais des valeurs éthiques. L'Art du Flou est devenu aussi l'Art de faire, vite, de l'Argent. Nous vivons dans un monde un peu trop pressé !! Pour aller où ?

En partant de l'art du flou et de l'art suggestif, évocateur, allusif de l'esquisse, l'esprit de système, la soumission à la mode, ont conduit beaucoup d' artistes à l'art facile, à l'art bâclé.

  

FROM THE SKETCH AND THE ART OF BLUR TO BOTCHED ART

 

Modern Art, announced well before the beginning of the 20th century by the pré-impressionnists, impressionists and post-impressionists, was a factor quite remarkable renewal forms in European painting.

Art has always been a way to dream the real world. But the new techniques of modern art, are moving away intentionally, deliberately, of the exact representation of reality.

The painters of the Modern Art tend to create an art in which the interpretation of reality trumps its reproduction.

The modern artist no longer reproduces the real, he dreams it, or invents it. These trends have resulted in non-figurative art, also called abstract art.

This renewal forms in painting is total. He brought new possibilities of artistic expression.

Among the techniques developed during the 19th century, the sketch was one of the best expressions of the Art of Blur.

The Art of Blur has been practiced ingeniously by Leonardo da Vinci. The "Sfumato" is in the context of a very figurative and perfectly finished painting, like the Mona Lisa, the Virgin on the rock, or John the Baptist, a draft of art of blur..

But the sketch was especially in the history of painting a project, a preparatory study, which allowed the artist to ensure the coherence and balance of his finished painting. In this case, usually, the blur is only an approximation, a preform, a draft, witnessed an incomplete art which needs to be completed.

But many artists, over the centuries, have understood perfectly that the sketch was sometimes, exceptionally, be a finished work.

That is to say a work, of which a large majority of spectators, experts or not, imperiously felt that NOTHING was to be added to it. This is not a mathematical definition, but this is the best.

The sketch is a finished work, only when it is creative, of a singular atmosphere, particularly suggestive, carrying a singular poetry. When he appears, with evidence, that more precision in drawing, closes the doors to the imagination, to the mystery, and destroy a subtle balance between dream and reality.

The tto precise drawing can, in fact, close the doors to the imagination. While the blur, characteristic of the sketch, can open these doors. The photographers also know well: The blur can be simply fuzzy, but it can also be an invitation to feel a mystery and to participate in an enigma. The viewer is invited to furnish the blur proposed to him, through his imagination.

But it is an alchemy that only great artists have exceptionally found the secret.

The great master of this technique who first, the most precocally , pushed him, above all, was William Turner (1775-1851).

Delacroix was also a little after Turner, one of the major precursors of the art of the sketch. For example in the "death of Sadarnapale" but also in many other paintings. But Delacroix is also an example of the limitations of this technique. All techniques meet, at one time or another, their limits.

The Art of the sketch is terribly difficult, because it is not enough to draw schematically a subject to make a beautiful work. It is not enough to draw and paint blur, or photographing blur, to create a work of art.

Europe has discovered with the Romantics (Delacroix, Turner Constable) and the Impressionists the art of sketch and its particular charms, but today we see the sketch in profusion, to the point that we can ask the question: How about we go back to the art that finishes his paintings? Like the artists of the MEAM from Barcelona? How many artists since the Impressionists have sketched for ease ?! In fact, to be able to paint a really artistic sketch, one must be able to paint a well-designed, completely finished and painted picture, and add an indefinable beauty to it, by not finishing it! It's not given for everyone.

The blur can be only a sketch or an approximation, which ultimately market value is up to the signing of a big name.

It is true that the sketch can release a certain expressive power, have an evocative power, a poetry of unfinished. An expressive force that the painting, well finished, well designed and well painted, completed, can actually lose. But the poetic magic of Blur Art cannot be systematic.

It is also very much a question of fashion. A habit of the look. A culture.

The aesthetics of our time is a little too focused on the sketch.

We finally see only sketches in the galleries of modern and contemporary paintings.

In fact the artists are not the solely responsibles, for this situation. In the 19th century Western society has entered a culture that makes of the success material, economic, and of money, its main values. Therefore the sketches, which would not come out of personal drafts of the artist, in previous centuries, have become merchandises, and sources of profits. These goods are found even in museums. Picasso understood very well, this economic mechanism.

Of course this evolution is dressed in Great Principles: There is no question of Money, but of the Artist, of the Freedom of Creation,of the Progress of the Arts, of a "new sensibility", "to live with her time "etc

This omnipresence of the sketch reflects not only habits of gaze but ethical values. The Art of Blur has become also the Art of making money fast. We live in a world a little too hurry !! To go where ?

Starting from the art of blur and suggestive art, evocative, allusive of the sketch, the system spirit, the submission to fashion, led many artists to the sloppy art, to the botched art.

   

Beauty is an omnipresence of death and loveliness, a smiling sadness that we discern in nature and all things, a mystic communion that the poet feels.

 

-Charlie Chaplin

Crusie Ship "ALBATROS" departing from Antwerp / Belgium.

Scenery captured on 29/04/2012 @ 18:08:48 hrs.

De toutes les églises de Rome, une seule est considérée comme étant la « mère et tête de toutes les églises » : la basilique Saint-Jean de Latran, cathédrale de Rome, siège du diocèse de la Ville.

 

Cette église fondamentale du Catholicisme est propriété du Saint-Siège et fait donc partie du Vatican (même si elle ne se trouve pas sur le territoire du Vatican). C’est une des quatre basiliques majeures de Rome, et ne l’est pas que par la taille : 12 conciles y eurent lieu, dont 5 œcuméniques tout au long du Moyen-âge et de la Renaissance (1123, 1139, 1179, 1215 et de 1512 à 1516). C’est aussi au Latran que Charlemagne se fit baptiser, à Pâques en 774, ou que les fameux accords entre l’Eglise et l’Etat furent signés en 1929, les accords du Latran.

L’Archibasilique du Très Saint-Sauveur, plus connue sous le nom de Basilique de Saint-Jean de Latran, est l’église la plus ancienne de la ville, construite avant même Saint Pierre de Rome. L’empereur Constantin Ier (306-337) l’a fit construire, selon la légende, après avoir guéri d’une maladie en 313, et sera consacrée en 324 par le pape Sylvestre Ier. C’est l’église utilisée par le pape, lorsqu’il assume le rôle d’évêque de la Ville Éternelle. Elle est bâtie sur les anciens terrains d’une ancienne famille patricienne, les Laterani, qui donnèrent ainsi leur nom à l’église, Latran. Sainte Hélène, la mère de Constantin, chrétienne très fervente, avait fait cadeau des terrains au pape de l’époque, Melchiade.

Avant le renouveau de Saint-Pierre de Rome, à la Renaissance, le siège de la Chrétienté était au Latran. Pendant 1000 ans, du IVe au XIVe siècle, le pape y avait sa résidence, son siège, jusqu’à l’« exil » de Clément V à Avignon, en 1309. L’ancienne résidence papale est encore visible, le Palais de Latran, que l’on peut voir collé à la basilique, reconverti en musée par le pape Grégoire XVI. L’église avec tant de reconstructions, eu forcément des besoins financiers importants. Les rois de France contribuèrent au financement, depuis Louis XI au XVe siècle, de façon plus ou moins régulière suivant les aléas de l’Histoire, jusqu’en 1871. Henri IV, en échange de l’assurance des revenus provenant de l’Abbaye de Clairac pour le Latran, fut remercié avec une statue que l’on peut encore voir de nos jours, et le dirigeant français fut fait chanoine d’honneur. Aujourd’hui, le Président de la République, quel qu’il soit est ainsi systématiquement fait chanoine d’honneur de la basilique Saint-Jean de Latran.

L’église que nous pouvons admirer aujourd’hui date du XVIIe siècle, sous le pontificat d’Urbain V, est la deuxième plus grande église de Rome, avec ses 130m de long. La façade blanche réalisée entre 1732 et 1735, toute en travertin, fut conçue par le Florentin Alessandro Galilei, avec les statues monumentales en son sommet. Ces statues de 7m de haut représentent Jésus, Saint Jean et Saint Jean-Baptiste, ainsi que les docteurs de l’église. La gigantesque porte de bronze est une porte antique, qui n’est autre que celle de l’ancienne Curie romaine ! Sur le fronton, nous pouvons y lire « omnium urbis et orbis ecclesiarum mater et caput », mère et tête de toutes les églises de la ville et du monde.

 

La structure intérieure de la basilique est l’œuvre de Francesco Borromini, exécutée en style baroque. Les travaux débutèrent lors de l’année sainte, le Jubilé de 1650, commandés par le pape Innocent X. Des 14 arcades originelles, il passa à 5, retravaillant ainsi totalement l’espace intérieur de la basilique, qui retrouva l’esprit de l’édifice antique, avec ses 5 nefs. Dans chaque niche de la nef, longue de 130m, nous pouvons voir les statues des apôtres qui regardent les fidèles venus à l’église. Ces statues furent sculptées entre 1703 et 1719. Les chapelles latérales sont également issues du génie de Borromini. Le jeu de lumières que Borromini a su créer est bluffant, avec la lumière qui rentre par les fenêtres, tels des puits de lumière. Cette lumière si spéciale renforce le coté sacré de cet endroit. Borromini conservera le sol, venu du Moyen-âge, et le plafond, en caissons peints et moulures dorées, du bois sculpté du XVIe siècle.

Le sol de la basilique mérite toute l’attention du monde. C’est un sol que l’on nomme de « cosmatesque ». Ce type de sol, fait d’innombrables morceaux de marbre, était typique de l’Italie du Moyen-âge, friande de ce type de mosaïque. Le nom vient de Laurent Cosma et de sa famille, les Cosmati, des artisans qui créèrent bon nombre de ces œuvres, en prélevant le marbre des ruines romaines antiques. Ces sols sont absolument splendides, m’impressionnant beaucoup plus que toutes les statues de l’église : on n’a pas l’habitude de marcher sur quelque chose de si beau, et son omniprésence donne cet aspect chaleureux à Saint Jean de Latran, bien différent des sols en pierre des cathédrales gothiques.

 

Of all the churches in Rome, only one is considered the "mother and head of all churches": the Basilica of St. John Lateran, cathedral of Rome, seat of the diocese of the City.

 

This fundamental church of Catholicism is property of the Holy See and therefore part of the Vatican (even if it is not located on Vatican territory). It is one of the four major basilicas of Rome, and it is not only because of the size: 12 councils took place, including 5 ecumenical throughout the Middle Ages and the Renaissance (1123, 1139, 1179, 1215 and from 1512 to 1516). It is also in the Lateran that Charlemagne was baptized, at Easter in 774, or that the famous agreements between the Church and the State were signed in 1929, the Lateran agreements.

The Archibasilica of the Most Holy Savior, better known as the Basilica of St. John Lateran, is the oldest church in the city, built even before St. Peter of Rome. Emperor Constantine I (306-337) had it built, according to legend, after curing a disease in 313, and will be consecrated in 324 by Pope Sylvester I. This is the church used by the pope when he assumes the role of bishop of the Eternal City. It is built on the old grounds of an old patrician family, the Laterani, which gave their name to the church, Lateran. St. Helena, the mother of Constantine, a very fervent Christian, had given the land to the pope of the time, Melchiade.

Before the revival of St. Peter's in Rome, during the Renaissance, the siege of Christendom was at the Lateran. For 1000 years, from the fourth to the fourteenth century, the pope had his residence, his seat, until the "exile" of Clement V in Avignon, in 1309. The former papal residence is still visible, the Lateran Palace , which can be seen stuck to the basilica, converted into a museum by Pope Gregory XVI. The church with so many reconstructions, had necessarily important financial needs. The kings of France contributed to the financing, since Louis XI in the 15th century, in a more or less regular way according to the vagaries of the History, until 1871. Henry IV, in exchange for the insurance of the revenues coming from the Abbey from Clairac to the Lateran, was thanked with a statue that can still be seen today, and the French leader was made canon of honor. Today, the President of the Republic, whoever he is is thus systematically made canon of honor of the basilica Saint-Jean of Lateran.

The church that we can admire today dates from the seventeenth century, under the pontificate of Urban V, is the second largest church in Rome, with its 130m long. The white facade built between 1732 and 1735, all travertine, was designed by the Florentine Alessandro Galilei, with the monumental statues at the top. These statues 7m high represent Jesus, Saint John and Saint John the Baptist, as well as the doctors of the church. The gigantic bronze door is an ancient door, which is none other than that of the ancient Roman Curia! On the pediment, we can read "omnium urbis and orbis ecclesiarum mater and caput", mother and head of all the churches of the city and the world.

The inner structure of the basilica is the work of Francesco Borromini, executed in Baroque style. Work began during the holy year, the Jubilee of 1650, commissioned by Pope Innocent X. Of the 14 original arcades, he went to 5, thus completely reworking the interior space of the basilica, which found the spirit of the ancient building, with its 5 naves. In each niche of the nave, 130m long, we can see the statues of the apostles who watch the faithful coming to the church. These statues were carved between 1703 and 1719. The side chapels are also from the genius of Borromini. The play of lights that Borromini has created is stunning, with the light coming in through the windows, like skylights. This special light reinforces the sacred side of this place. Borromini will preserve the soil, from the Middle Ages, and the ceiling, in painted boxes and gilded moldings, carved wood of the sixteenth century.

The basilica floor deserves all the attention of the world. It is a soil that we call "cosmatesque". This type of floor, made of innumerable pieces of marble, was typical of medieval Italy, fond of this type of mosaic. The name comes from Laurent Cosma and his family, the Cosmati, craftsmen who created many of these works, taking marble from the ancient Roman ruins. These soils are absolutely splendid, impressing me much more than all the statues of the church: we are not used to walking on something so beautiful, and its omnipresence gives this warm aspect to Saint Jean de Latran, very different from the stone floors of Gothic cathedrals.

The passing of the 10,000,000 views in the joy of accomplishment to capture the thrill of creative effort. 3333 images are shown in the gallery and 20 are over 50,000 views. Most viewed image exceeds 300,000 views Numerology is naturally an interest that occurs during awakening because many individuals will find themselves starting to see repeated numerological sequences over and over, sometimes even to the point where these numbers begin to haunt them. The most common being 11:11 however the more you notice the more you see, numbers such as 12:34, 111, 1:33, 333, 444, 555, etc. begin to follow you everywhere you go. Many people believe they are simply “Angelic Numbers” or “Messages from the Angels” but in truth Numerology is a very complex system. Each number corresponds to the system of the Kabbalah and the Tarot. The way to understand each of the numerological sequences you have to study the tree of life, archetypes, geometry and various symbolism throughout ancient history. Each number is a point on the dimensional plane of the system of the mind. Numerology works in a way that triggers a subconscious archetypal response within your long term memory all going right back to processing numbers like a futuristic computer. Carl Jung has studied this concept of subconscious triggers extensively within his work such as Man and His Symbols. They are essentially mind relapse triggers that influence our long term memory and change our DNA. You could say they’re “upgrades” but what they are doing is triggering your subconscious mind into the act of remembrance of who you are.What does seeing Numerology such as 11:11, 12:34, 1:11, 3:33… mean to me?

In reality while there is much symbolism behind each number, the true meaning all comes down to what resonates with you most. They could be said these are “Codes” that unlock our dna strands and awaken old memories of who we used to be but they are honestly a trigger like a talisman. 11:11 is by far the most common as well as 111,222,333,444,555, etc. Any of the master numbers can/will start showing up repeatedly denoting a particular sequential message. It’s always good to pay attention to your thoughts at the particular time you see the number or look at what you are doing. Being conscious of our surroundings, what we’re doing or what is around us at the time such as a symbol can sometimes help to figure out the meaning behind the message of the number.

 

There are various theories out there for why numbers are displaying a particular message. Some of these include:

 

Binary DNA Activation – Reality is composed from numbers, our mind is similar to a computer which relies on binary codes (1’s and 0’s). These Numbers such as 11:11 are working as a form of binary that activates your dormant (junk) DNA.

11:11 Gateway/Portal – Also known as Stargates, 10.10. 10. 11.11.11 12.12.12 These are astrological alignments that are created during a specific date in time. They are most known for being an Energetic Gateway for others to Awaken and also known to create energetic shifts. It could also signify that “11:11 is the doorway between two worlds – between the 3rd dimensional and the 5th dimensional worlds” [ref]In5d All About 11:11[/ref]

Making a Wish – Many Teenagers used to play the game “make a wish it’s 11:11”, perhaps their subconscious knew more than they did about this mysterious phenomena.

Life Path Numbers – Life Path numbers are a different form of numerology but are connected to Symbolic interpretation. They are found by adding your birth date and birth year together into a single digit.

Angel or Spirit Guide Messages – The more popular theory by Doreen Virtue that Numerology is basically messages from your angels or spirit guides trying to communicate with you. These messages include similar sayings such as “you are on the right direction of your spiritual path” or “stay positive, you have nothing to fear in regards to your soul purpose”

Fibonacci Sequence/Golden Ratio – Our reality is made around the Golden Ratio even our bodies are composed from the beautiful sequence of Phi, perhaps the numbers are simply reminding us of who we are?

Global Consciousness – Cosmic consciousness, sometimes people just simply think that these numbers are here to tell us we are connected to one another.

Wake Up Call – The most popular interpretation, Wake up call to GLOBAL AWAKENING. Numerology is mainly noticed by people who are going through the process of a Spiritual/ Kundalini Awakening. These numbers could simply mean you are on the right track and they signify your own Awakening Journey.

Since Numerology is linked to archetypal symbolism, the most direct interpretation will always be the symbolic representation of the Number itself. The numbers are there to guide us but the most powerful meaning is the one you put in front of the symbol. What resonates with you?

The Master Numbers:

1010 – reality is a biogenetic experiment created from numbers

911 – 9=Endings. 11=DNA. 911=ending code of our DNA program in this reality.

111 – The vision, illumination, channel to the subconscious, insight without rational thought, the gateway

222 – Duality – Polarity – Reality is created by an electromagnetic energy grid. 2+2=2=6=Flower of Life

333 – Represents a higher octave of 9 = closure in 3D

444 – Represents a higher octave of 3 = 4d mastery of thought and illusion

555 – All elements(air, earth, water, fire, ether) combined is a sphenic number. In base 10, it is a repdigit, and because it is divisible by the sum of its digits, it is a Harshad number. It is also a Harshad number in binary, base 11, base 13 and hexadecimal. Represents 5D

 

666 – Creating the merkabah, star of david, aligning the elements and the senses together in understanding. the number of man elements of earth combined with spirit

777 – Spiritual divine connection (connected to crown chakra)

888 – Rebirth, infinity, paradise regained

999 – Karma codes ending, life cycles complete. It is the Triple Triad – Completion; fulfillment; attainment; beginning and the end; the whole number; a celestial and angelic number – the Earthly Paradise.

10 – Completion and back to the source energy field or universal cosmic consciousness. Ten is the number of the cosmos—-the paradigm of creation. The decad contains all numbers and therefore all things and possibilities. It is the radix or turning point of all counting.

 

The representation of all master numbers connects to the universal sequence of 369.

0 – Tree of life, zero point

3 – Density line, creation for all. 3d. creation, the triangle, the student, the third solution, the creation of a double charge, the progression through life.

6 – Perfect balance, which ideally transmit the will of God on earth. Heaven uniting with earth. double-builder 33, the power of the material world, balance

9 – Completion, whole creation, all thought, divine, full circle, bio-energy, complete creation, power, brilliance, triple connection and balance.

[mks_separator style=”dotted” height=”2″]The 11 is the most intuitive of all numbers. It represents illumination; a channel to the subconscious; insight without rational thought; and sensitivity, nervous energy, shyness,andimpracticality. It is a dreamer. The 11 has all the aspects of the 2, enhanced and charged with charisma, leadership, and inspiration. It is a number with inborn duality, which creates dynamism, inner conflict, andothercatalyses with its mere presence. It is a number that, when not focused on some goal beyond itself, can beturnedinward to create fears and phobias. The 11 walks the edge between greatness and self-destruction. Its potential for growth, stability, and personal power lies in its acceptance of intuitive understanding, and of spiritual truths. For the 11, such peace is not found so much in logic, but in faith. It is the psychic’s number.The 22 is the most powerful of all numbers. It is often called the Master Builder. The 22 can turn the most ambitious of dreams into reality. It is potentially the most successful of all numbers. It has many of the inspirational insights of the 11, combined with the practicality and methodical nature of the 4. It is unlimited, yet disciplined. It sees the archetype, and brings itdown to earth in some material form. It has big ideas, great plans, idealism, leadership, and enormous self-confidence. If not practical, the 22s waste their potential. Like the 11, the 22 can easily shrink from its own ambition, causing difficult interior pressures. Both the 11 and the 22 experience the pressure-cooker effect very strongly, particularly at an early age. It must work toward the realization of goals that are larger than personal ambition. The 22 serves the world in a practical way.The 33 is the most influential of all numbers. It is the Master Teacher. The 33 combines the 11 and the 22 and brings their potential to another level. When expressed to the fullest, the 33 lacks all personal ambition, and instead focuses its considerable abilities toward the spiritual uplifting of mankind. What makes the 33 especially impressive, is the high level of sincere devotion. This is shown in its determination to seek understanding and wisdom before preaching to others. The 33 in full force is extremely rare. [ref]Numerology: Key to Your Inner Self By Hanz Decoz[/ref]

[mks_separator style=”dotted” height=”2″]

Numbers Their Culture and Their Meanings:

The Numbers explained Further Curiosity of Crystalinks [ref]Crystalinks.com A major thank you to Ellie who let us use her pages for reference[/ref]:

Zero

Zero is a powerful number which brings great transformational change, sometimes occurring in a profound manner. It has much intensity, so caution is needed wherever it appears to ensure that extremes are not encountered.

Zero represents the Cosmic Egg, the primordial Androgyne – the Plenum. Zero as an empty circle depicts both the nothingness of death and yet the totality of life contained within the circle. As an ellipse the two sides represent ascent and descent, evolution and involution.

Before the One (meaning the Source—not the number) there is only Void, or non-being; thought; the ultimate mystery, the incomprehensible Absolute. Begins with meanings such as, Non-existence; nothingness; the unmanifest; the unlimited; the eternal. The absence of all quality or quantity.

Cultural References

Taoism: It symbolizes the Void; non-being.

Buddhism: It is the Void and no-thingness.

Kabbalism: Boundless; Limitless Light; the Ain.

Pathagoras saw zero as the perfect. Zero is the Monad, the originator and container of All.

Islamic: Zero is the Divine Essence.

Zero Number connected to Fibonacci Numbers

[mks_separator style=”dotted” height=”2″]

One (1)

1 (one) is a number, numeral, and the name of the glyph representing that number. It is the natural number following 0 and preceding 2. It represents a single entity. One is sometimes referred to as unity or unit as an adjective. For example, a line segment of “unit length” is a line segment of length 1. Is considered to be a primordial unity. The beginning. The Creator. It the First Cause or as some cultures refer, the First Mover. One is the sum of all possibilities. It is essence, the Center. One is referred to isolation. One springs forth, upsurges. It is seen as the number that gives cause to duality as multiplicity and back to final unity. Chinese: refer to one as Yang, masculine; celestial. It is seen as an auspicios number. One is The Monad. Christian : God the Father; the Godhead.

Hebrew: Adonai, the Lord, the Most High, the I am, hidden intelligence. Islamic: One refers to one as God as unity; the Absolute; self sufficient. Pathagorean: One as meaning Spirit; God, from which all things come. It is the very essence, the Monad. Taoism “Tao begets One, One begets Two, Two begets Three and Three begets all things.” [mks_separator style=”dotted” height=”2″]

Two (2)

Duality. Alteration; diversity; conflict; dependence. Two is a static condition. It is rooted, seen as balance (two sides); stability; reflection. Two are the opposite poles. Represents the dual nature of the human being. It is desire, since all that is manifest in duality is in pairs of opposites. As One represents a point, two represents a length. The Binary is the first number to recede from Unity, it also symbolizes sin which deviates from the first good and denotes the transitory and the corruptible.Two represents two-fold strength—that is symbolized by two of anything, usually in history, by animals in pairs. Cultural References In Alchemy, two are the opposites, sun and moon. King and Queen. Sulpher and quicksilver, at first antagonistic but finally resolved and united in the androgyne. Buddhist: see two as the duality of samsara; male and female. Two is theory and practice; wisdom and method. It is blind and the lame united to see the way and to walk it.

Chinese, two is Yin , feminine; terrestrial; inauspicious. Christian: Christ with two natures as God and human.

Revelation: Two is the number of witness. The disciples were sent out by two’s (Mark 6:7). Two witnesses are required to establish truth (Deu 17:6, John 8:17, 2 Cor 13:1). Examples in Revelation are the beast out of the earth who has two horns like a lamb but spoke like a dragon (13:11). He is the false prophet. However the two witnesses are the true prophets of God (11:3). Hebrew: Two is The life-force. In Qabalism wisdom and self-consciousness. Hindu: Two is duality, the shakta-shakti. Islamic: Two Spirit. Platonic: Plato says two is a digit without meaning as it implies relationship, which introduces the third factor. Pythagorean: Two is The Duad, the divided terrestrial being. Taoist says two is representative of The K’ua, the Two. Determinants, the yin-yang. Two is a weak yin number as it as no center. Duality. Alteration; diversity; conflict; dependence. Two is a static condition. It is rooted, seen as balance (two sides); stability; reflection. Two are the opposite poles. Represents the dual nature of the human being. It is desire, since all that is manifest in duality is in pairs of opposites. As One represents a point, two represents a length. The Binary is the first number to recede from Unity, it also symbolizes sin which deviates from the first good and denotes the transitory and the corruptible.Two represents two-fold strength—that is symbolized by two of anything, usually in history, by animals in pairs. Cultural References

In Alchemy, two are the opposites, sun and moon. King and Queen. Sulpher and quicksilver, at first antagonistic but finally resolved and united in the androgyne. Buddhist: see two as the duality of samsara; male and female. Two is theory and practice; wisdom and method. It is blind and the lame united to see the way and to walk it. Chinese, two is Yin , feminine; terrestrial; inauspicious. Christian: Christ with two natures as God and human. Revelation: Two is the number of witness. The disciples were sent out by two’s (Mark 6:7). Two witnesses are required to establish truth (Deu 17:6, John 8:17, 2 Cor 13:1). Examples in Revelation are the beast out of the earth who has two horns like a lamb but spoke like a dragon (13:11). He is the false prophet. However the two witnesses are the true prophets of God (11:3). Hebrew: Two is The life-force. In Qabalism wisdom and self-consciousness. Hindu: Two is duality, the shakta-shakti. Islamic: Two Spirit. Platonic: Plato says two is a digit without meaning as it implies relationship, which introduces the third factor. Pythagorean: Two is The Duad, the divided terrestrial being. Taoist says two is representative of The K’ua, the Two. Determinants, the yin-yang. Two is a weak yin number as it as no center [mks_separator style=”dotted” height=”2″]

Three (3). The third dimension – we do things in threes so they will manifest in our physical realm. It’s roots stem from the meaning of multiplicity. Creative power; growth. Three is a moving forward of energy, overcoming duality, expression, manifestation and synthesis. Three is the first number to which the meaning “all” was given. It is The Triad, being the number of the whole as it contains the beginning, a middle and an end. The power of three is universal and is the tripartide nature of the world as heaven, earth, and waters. It is human as body, soul and spirit. Notice the distinction that soul and spirit are not the same. They are not. Three is birth, life, death. It is the beginning, middle and end. Three is a complete cycle unto itself. It is past, present, future. The symbol of three is the triangle. Three interwoven circles or triangles can represent the indissoluble unity of the three persons of the trinity. Others symbols using three are: trident, fleur-de-lis, trefoil, trisula, thunderbolt, and trigrams. The astral or emotional body stays connected to the physically body for three days after death. There is scientific evidence that the brain, even when all other systems are failing takes three days to register complete shutdown. There are 3 phases to the moon. Lunar animals are often depcited as 3 legged.

Three is the heavenly number, representing soul, as four represents body. Together the two equal seven (3+4=7 ) and form the sacred hebdomad. The 3×4=12 representing the signs of the Zodiac and months of the year. Pythagorean three means completion. There are three wishes, genies have three wishes, three leprecons, three prince or princesses, three witches, three weird sisters among others. Cultural References Africa Ashanti: the moon goddess is three people, two black, and one white. Arabian, Pre-Islamic: the Manant is a threefold goddess representing the 3 Holy Virgins, Al-Itab, Al-Uzza, and Al-Manat. They are depicted as aniconic stelae, stones or pillars, or as pillars surmounted by doves. Buddhist: tradition the theme of 3 is represented by, The Tri-ratna, The Three Precious Jewels, and the Buddha, Dharma, Sangha.

Chinese: Sanctity; the auspicious number; the first odd, yang number….The moon toad, or bird, is three-legged. Celtic: Bridgit is threefold; there are the Three Blessed Ladies and innumerable Triads, often a threefold aspect of the same divinity. Christianity: Three represents the Trinity, the soul, the union of body and soul in human in the church. There were three gifts of the Magi to Christ as God-King-Sacrifice; three figures of transformation, temptations, denials by Peter (one of the 12 Apostles—- 12=3 (1+2=3). There were 3 crosses at Calvary, He died on The Hills, there were 3 days to the death process for Christ, and there were 3 appearances after his death. There were 3 Marys, and there are 3 qualities or theological virtutes being Faith, Hope, Love or more commonly known as Charity. The number 3 gives to the meaning the embracing Godhead – Father, Mother, Son/Daughter. Egyptian: Hermetic tradition, Thoth is the Thrice Great, ‘Trismegistus’. The Supreme Power. The opening line of the Emerald Tablets of Thoth the Atlantean. Tablet 11

Three is the mystery, come from the great one, Hear, and light on thee will dawn. In the primeval dwell three unities,Other than these none can exist. These are the equilibrium, source of creation,One God, One Truth, One Point of Freedom.Three come forth from the three of the balance, All Life, all Good, all Power.Three are the qualities of God in his light-home Infinite Power, Infinite Wisdom, Infinite Love. Three are the circles (or states) of Existence: The Circle of Light where dwells nothing but God, and only God can traverse it, The Circle of Chaos where all things by nature arise from Death, The Circle of Awareness where all things spring from Life. All things animate are of three states of existence, Chaos or death, liberty in humanity, and felicity of Heaven. There is an ancient wisdom that’s says; ‘Messages or events that come in three’s are worth noticing. ‘Whenever anything is mentioned three times it is a witness to us that these things are of utmost importance. Three symbolizes manifestation into the physical. It is the triangle – pyramid shape in the vesica pisces – see image below. The TV Show ‘Charmed’ deals the ‘Power of Three Sister Witches’, known as the Charmed Ones. Their job is to vanquish evil forces in their many forms and sometimes non-forms. knot The symbol to the side, called a Triquetra (tri-KET a Latin word meaning ‘three cornered’) appears on The Book Of Shadows.an ancient book of spells that assists these ‘Charmed Ones’ in dealing with the evil forces they are continually encountering. In some episodes so called evil and good must work together to bring balance to a situation. They cancel each other out in the end – poof – gone – disappeared! ‘Power of Three’ has to do with Alchemy. The Egyptian god Thoth or the Greek Hermes Trismegistus (Thrice Blessed or Thrice Great) are the progenitors of the Emerald Tablets describing the mysteries of Alchemy. The alchemy of three is demonstrated by its power of multiplicity. For example, in understanding the numbers – One gave rise to Two (1+1=2) and Two gave Rise to Three (2+1=3) and Three gave rise to all numbers (3+1=4, 3+2=5, 3+3=6, 3+4=7, 3+5=8 3+6=9). Thus in addition to being a number of good fortune, Three is also the number of multiplicity and alchemy among other things. Many believe the Triquetrais an ancient symbol of the female trinity, because it is composed of three interlaced yonic Vesica Pisces (a.k.a. PiscisSLatin for “Vessel of the Fish”) and is the most basic and important construction in Sacred Geometry, which is the architecture of the universe.

A Vesica is formed when the circumference of two identical circles each pass through the center of the other in effect creating a portal. ‘The Triquetra’ represents the ‘Power of Three’ or the threefold nature of existence i.e. body, mind and spirit; life, death and rebirth; past, present and future; beginning, middle and end; Sun, Moon and Earth; and the threefold co-creative process described as thought, word, and deed. Sphere=ovum Vesica Pisces – Oval opening of the penis The creation process as described in the Vedas is unfolding, maintaining, and concluding as in birth, life and death. There are innumerable trinities and triads throughout myth and religious traditions, such as the triple goddess; maiden, mother, crone. One example in Greek mythology is Kore, Demeter, Hecate. The Christian trinity is Father, Son and Holy Ghost. Vedic trinities include Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva with their consorts Saraswati, Lakshmi and Kali to name just a few. [mks_separator style=”dotted” height=”2″]

Four (4)

Four is the 4th dimension = time which is illusion. Four is seen as the first solid number. Spatial in scheme or order in manifestation.Static as opposed to the circular and the dynamic Wholeness; totality; completion; solid Earth; order

Rational – relativity and justice Symbol of measurement

Foundation The are four cardinal points; four seasons; four winds; four directions (as in North, South, East, West); four elements (Fire, Water, Air, Earth) in the western culture. There are four sides to a square; four arms to a cross. There are four rivers to Paradise, that formed a cross (the Garden of Eden was said to be within the four rivers). Within Paradise were four infernal regions, seas, and sacred mountains. There are four watches of the night and day, quarters of the moon. There are four quarters to the earth. There are four tetramorphs. The Divine Quaternity is in direct contrast to the Trinity. Four is a symbolic number used throughout in the Old Testament. The quaternary can be depicted as the quatrefoil as well as the square and the cross.Cultural References

Native American: As in other cultures, ceremonies and ritual acts are repeated in fours. The Native Amercican cultures have used the number 4 most frequently as in the four cardinal directions. The four winds are depicted by the symbol of the cross and by the symbol of the swastika. The swastika as some misbelieve was not created by Hitler. It was instead borrowed from the Native American and occult beliefs of which Hitler had great interests. Hitler derived his “insanity” of power from his misdirected interpretation and use of metaphysical principles. He used knowledge that his human consciousness couldn’t possibly understand and the use of this knowledge for personal gain is part of the imbalance that creates the chaos and karma. Buddhism: The Damba Tree of Life has four limbs and from its roots four sacred streams of Paradise that represent the the four boundless wishes of compassion, affection, love impartiality. It also represents the four directions of the heart as well. Chinese Buddism: there are four celestial guardians of cardinal points are Mo-li Ch’ing, the East, with the jade ring and spear; Virupaksha, the West, the Far-gazer, with the four-stringed quitar; Virudhaka, the South, with the umbrella of choas and darkness and earthquakes; Vaisravenna, the North, with the whips, leopard-skin bag, snake and pearl. Chinese: Four is the number of the Earth, symbolized by square. There are four streams of immortality. Four is even an number. It is Yin in polarity.

Christian: Four is the number representing the body, with three representing the soul. Again we see the theme of the four rivers in Paradise. There are four Gospels, Evangelists, chef arch-angels, chef-devils, four Fathers of the Church, Great Prophets. There are four cardinal virtues—prudence, fortitude, justice, temperance. The are four winds from which the One Spirit is said to come. There are four horsemen of the Apocalypse. Revelation: There four angels standing at the four corners of the Earth, holding back the four winds of the earth (Rev 7:1). The great multitude from every nation, tribe, people and language (four-fold description) – Rev 5:9 11:9 13:7 14:6 the four-fold description indicates that these people come from all over the earth. Egyptian: Four is the sacred number of Time, measurement of the sun. Four pillars support the vault of heaven. There are four canopic jars placed around the dead at the four corners guarded by the four sons of Horus who are associated with the cardinal points. In the Hermetic it is the divine quaternity. It represents God. Gnostic: belief in Barbelo, the Four-ness of God. Greek: Four is the sacred number of Hermes Hebrew: Four represents measuring; beneficence; intelligence. In the Kabbalah four is memory; four represents the four worlds of the Kabbalah.It also represents the four directions of space and the four levels of the hierarchical organism of the Torah. Hindu: Four is Totality; plenitude; perfection. Brahma, the Creator is four faced. The temple is based on the four sides of the square, symbolizing order and finality. There are four tattvas the four bodies bodies of human and kingdoms of nature which are animal, vegetable, mineral, mind. There are four yugas. Four is the winning throw of the dice. There are four castes and pairs of opposites. Islamic: tradition the four terms of the quaternary are the Principle which is Creator; Universal Spirit; Universal Soul; and the primordial matter. These correspond to the four worlds of Kabbalism. There are four angelic beings and four houses of death. There are four levels to the Bardo. Mayan culture four giants support the celestial roof. Four is seen as the number of support .Pythagorean: Four is Perfection; harmonious proportion; justice; the earth. Four is the number of the Pythagorean oath. Four and ten are divinities. The Tetraktys 1+2+3+4=10. Scandinavian: there are four rivers of milk flowing in Asgard.Sumero-Semitic: Four astral gods are indentified with the four cardinal points. Teutonic: four dwarfs support the world. Taoist: There are four celestial guardians, Li, with the pagoda; Ma, with the sword; Cho with two swords; Wen with a spiked club. [mks_separator style=”dotted” height=”2″] Five (5)

Five is the symbol of human microcosm. The number of the human being. Human forms—-the pentagon when arms and legs are out stretched. The pentagon is endless —-sharing the symbolism of perfection and power of the circle. Five is a circular number as it produces itself in its last digit when raised to its own power. The pentacle, like the circle symbolizes whole, the quincunx being the number of its center and the meeting point of heaven, earth, and the four cardinal points plus the center point. Five is also representative of the Godhead – Central Creator of the four fours plus itself equalling five. Five is the marriage of the hieros gamos as combination of feminine and the masculine. Feminine being even, as 2, in frequency and masculine being odd as 3 in frequency = 5. The number five symbolizes meditation; religion; versatility. It represents the five senses (taste, touch, smell, sight, hearing) everywhere except in the East. In the East there are six—-the extra being Mind. We find meanings to five in the five petaled flower, five pointed leaves—especially the ROSE. The Rose has much symbolism, but also the lily, vine, all of which represent the microcosm.

The five pointed star depicts individuality and spiritual aspiration, and education when it points upward. The five pointed star pointing downward represents witchcraft, and it is used in black magic. Noted: There is a very broad difference between witchcraft and black magic. The number five formed the first counting process from which all else came. Cultural References Alchemy: The five petaled flower and five pointed star symbolizing the quintessence.

Buddhist: belief the heart has four directions— the heart center makes five, symbolizing, universality. This idea is also symbolized by the Sacred Mountains surrounded by the four islands. There are five Dhyani Buddhas: Vairocana, the Brillant, who is represented by the wheel, the witness; Akshobhya, the Imperturbable, with vajra, the East and blue; Ratnasambhava, the Jewel-born, jewel, south, yellow; Amitabha, Boundless Light, lotus, West, red; Amoghasiddhi, Infallible Success, sword, North, green. Chinese: There are five elements. Five atmospheres; conditions; planets; sacred mountains; grains, colors, tastes, poisons; powerful charms; cardinal virtues; blessings; eternal ideas; relations to human kind. Christian: Five depicts human beings after the Fall in the Garden of Eden. There are five senses; five points to the cross; wounds of Christ; fishes feeding five thousand; and books of Moses. Egyptian: There are five crocodiles of the Nile. Graeco-Roman: Five is the nuptial number of love and union.. It is the number of Venus. Venus years are completed in groups of five. Apollo as god of light has five qualities: omniscience, omnipresence; omnipotence, eternity, and unity.

Hebrew: Five represents strength and severity; radical intelligence. In kabbala five represence fear. Hindu: Five is the quinary groups of the world; the five elements of the subtle and coarse states; their primary colors; of senses; five faces of Siva and the twice-five incarnations of Vishnu. Islamic: There are five pillars of religion; five Devine Presences; five fundamental dogmas; five actions; and five daily times of prayer. Parsee: Five is a significant number in Parsee and Mandaean rites – possibly connected with the five sacred intercalary days of light. Pythagorean: Hieros, gamos, the marriage of heaven, earth. It represents Apollo as God of light and his five qualities. Crystalinks: The Pentagram Pentagrams often show up on palms – hands [mks_separator style=”dotted” height=”2″]

Six (6) Six represents equilibrium; harmony – balance. It is the perfect number within the decad: 1+2+3=6. It is the most productive of all numbers. It symbolizes union of polarity, the hermaphrodite being represented by the two interlaced triangles, the upward- pointing as male, fire and the heavens, and the downward-pointing as female, the waters and the earth. Six is the symbol of luck; love; health; beauty; chance. It is a winning number at the throw of the dice in the West. There are six rays of the solar wheel and there are six interlaced triangles. There are six pointed stars or Seal of Solomon – and Star of David – Merkabah Cultural References;Chinese: Six represents Universe, with its four cardinal points and the Above and Below – making it a total of six directions. Chinese culture there are six senses: tastse, touch, smell, sight, hearing, the sixth being mind. The day and night each have six periods. Christian: Six is perfection; completion because man was created on the sixth day. Six is man’s number The most obvious use of this number is in the notorious passage containing 666. (Rev 13:18 NIV) This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man’s number. His number is 666. Hebrew: There are six days of creation. It symbolizes meditation and intelligence. Kabbalism: Six is creation, and beauty. Pythagorean: Luck Sumerian: Six days of creation

[mks_separator style=”dotted” height=”2″]

Seven (7)

If 6 represents humanity then 7 – the center of the spiral is humanity’s connection to its source, god, Christ consciousness – or whatever name you prefer.

Seven is the number of the Universe. It is the three of the heavens (soul) combined with the four (body) of the earth; being the first number containing both the spiritual and the temporal. In looking over the list of meanings it doesn’t take long to figure out why the seven has become significant in metaphysical, religious and other spiritual doctrines – as seven represents the virginity of the Great Mother – feminine archetype – She who creates.

There are 7 ages of man ancient wonders of the world circles of Universe cosmic stages days of the week heavens hells

pillars of wisdom rays of the sun musical notes – sound as frequency plays a key roll in matters of Universe. There are over 80 octaves of frequency – each governing a specific manifestation in Universe. Cultural References In all cultures, myths and legends seven represents…completeness and totality macrocosm perfection plenty reintegration rest

security safety synthesis The writings about the seven-headed dragon appear throughout India, Persia, the Far East, especially Cambodia, but also Celtic and other Mediterranean myths. The seventh ray of the sun is the path by which the human beings pass from this world to the next. Seven days is the period for fasting and penitence. The seventh power of any number, both square and a cube and thus was given great importance. Alchemy – There are seven metals involved with the Work. Astrology: There are seven stars of the Great Bear which are indestructible. There are seven Pleiades— sometimes referred to as the, Seven Sisters. Buddhist: Seven is the number of ascent and of ascending to the higest; attaining the center. The seven steps of Buddha symbolize the ascent of the seven cosmic stages transcending time and space. The seven-storied prasada at Borobadur is a sacred mountain and axis mundi, culminating in the transcendent North, reaching the realm of Buddha. Chinese culture the meaning and symboligies are intertwined throughout in their myths and legends of fairies and animal spirits. Christian: Seven is idealogogy. God is represented by the seventh ray in the center of the six rays of creation. There are seven sacraments; gifts of spirit; the seven of 3+4 theological and cardinal virtues; deadly sins, tiers of Purgatory (in metaphysical belief this would be one of the lower astral planes – or in Buddhism, one of the Bardo planes). There are 7 councils of the early church – crystal spheres containing the planets – devils cast out by Christ – joys and sorrows of Mary the Blessed Virgin, mother of Jesus – liberal arts – major prophets – periods of fasting and penitence – seventh day after the six of creation In the Old Testament there are the seven altars of Baalam; oxen and rams for sacrifice; trumpets; circuits of Jericho; seven times Naaman bathed in the Jordan. Seven is the number of Samon’s bonds; the child raised by Elisha sneezed seven times. The Ark rested on the seventh month and the dove was sent out after seven days. The number seven is used 55 times in Revelation. It usually means fullness or completeness as in seven days of the week. God rested on the seventh day. Examples abound: seven churches, seven trumpets, seven seals, seven bowls, seven eyes etc etc. Egyptian mythology: There are seven Hathors as Fates and the priestesses of Hathor have seven jars in their seven tunics. Ra has seven hawks representing the seven Wise Ones. Six cows and a bull represent fertility. There are seven houses of the underworld, as depicted in Egyptian myths, with three times seven gates. Seven is the sacred number of Osiris. Graeco-Roman: Sacred to Apollo, whose lyre has seven strings, and to Athene/Minerva and Ares/Mars; Pan had seven pipes (again a reference to seven musical notes and frequency); there seven Wise Men of Greece. Hebrew tradition: Seven is the number of occult intelligence. There are seven Great Holy Days in the Jewish year; the Menorah has seven branches; the Temple took seven years to build; and there are seven pillars of wisdom. Hinduism there are Seven Jewels of the Brahmanas and seven gods before the floods and seven Wise Men saved from it. Islamic: The perfect number is seven. In Islamic tradition there are references to seven: heavens climates earths and seas

colors prophets (active powers) states or stations of the heart The Ka’aba is circumambulated seven times representing the seven attributes of God. Magic: There are seven knots in a cord for “spellbinding” and incantations are sevenfold. Certain orders of Brotherhood use theme of tying seven knots in their rope sash worn around their waist. Mithraic: The cave of Mithras has seven doors, seven altars, and a ladder with seven rungs depicting the seven grades of initiation into the mystery schools. Pythagorean: Seven is a cosmic number with three of heaven and four of the world. Sumero-Semitic: There are seven lunar divisions and days of the week. “Thou shalt shine with horns to determine six days and on the seventh with half a crown.”, the seventh thus becomes opposition to the sun and symbolizes darkness and balefulness and therefore is dangerous to undertake anything on the seventh day because that is the day of rest. We can see here the influence of this belief in other religious contexts. There are seven zones of earth; heavens, symbolized by the planes of ziggurat. There are seven branches to the Tree of Life each having seven leaves. Leaves are symbols of fertility, renewal and growth. There are seven gates of hell, seven demons of Tiamat and seven winds to destroy her—-interesting to note that in many belief systems it is said that the astral plane has seven levels to it—one sound on one of those levels is “wind”.

Seven is a mystic number traditionally associated with Venus and more recently with Neptune. It is the number of feelings and of instincts – of the Group Mind, of Love, whether that strange, indescribable but pervasive feeling of love is towards another person, a pet, oneself or one’s God. ‘Love’ embodies tremendous sexual energy, the emotions of which may be directed in various ways.

 

theawakenedstate.net/numerology/

Scenery captured onMarch 19, 2012 @ 19:37:43 from the Dining Room of my residence in Antwerp / Belgium

La suave brisa del otoño,

arrastra hojas pequeñas,

a un riachuelo cercano.

 

Más las hojas del gran encino,

bailan antiguas rondas,

junto a ninfas del bosque,

mientras la tarde canta,

esperando la desnudes de los árboles.

 

Un pájaro alza el vuelo,

cambiando el rumbo de las hojas,

caen esperando morir en tierra fértil,

para nacer otra vez en el ciclo del tiempo,

y ser transformadas por druidas en árboles viejos.

 

(Alexis Coald / Hojas de Otoño)

Scenery captured on April 13, 2012 @ 08:34:15 hrs. from the dining room of my Antwerp / Belgium residence.

on 10/7/12:

 

I had a dream that a man I didn't know had interviewed some of my ex's to learn about my life and write a movie along about our life. A fictional story based on an imaginary relationship with him.

 

He wanted to figure out a realistic hypothetical situation where we'd be together. From start to finish. Why we'd break up, if we'd dance in parking lots, whether we'd smoke pot sitting on our kitchen counters, if he would be someone i never feel comfortable around without make up on, or if i'd want to walk around naked in his apartment or wear high-rise underwear from american apparel around.

 

Would he be one of the boyfriends to help me through my fits of anxiety or one of the lucky ones who managed to get a year or two in when I was more healthy?

 

He had already written the first draft of the screenplay when I was handed a note by my balding ex that said, "I'm meeting Nessa at the food court tomorrow and I'd like you to come." This was the first I'd heard of it, but I wanted to meet him. I felt like everyone was watching me - like the writer had a bit of omnipresence, with everyone in the world watching what i did these days, taking notes and reporting back.

 

I thought I was going mad. A car followed me from the gas station to a diner and after passing by the window and observing my order, they drove away. I noticed an elderly woman in a red coat checking my shopping cart as she passed me in the supermarket, getting out a notebook as she turned into the cereal aisle. I found a scrap of paper in a parking lot that said "she sighed in the post office at 9:16 after checking her phone. Could she be slipping back into depression?"

 

I met him, briefly. For someone writing a movie inspired by our fictional relationship, he was dismissive of me. Maybe this was because we had already broken up in his version of the story. I thought I heard him call me a cunt under his breath.

 

He barely asked me any questions. He wanted to fill in some missing details he couldn't get from anyone else. "You mean, my side of the story?" No, he said. He asked how many orgasms I'd faked, whether or not I liked the gifts I got from Mike our last Christmas together, and if I was in love with XXXX when we dry humped in his living room.

 

The dream ended with me sitting in a depressing mall food court by myself. I can't remember if my balding ex had came or just handed off the note. I woke up with the strangest feeling of having been rejected.

© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

None of my images may be downloaded, copied, reproduced, manipulated or used on websites, blogs or other media without my explicit written permission. THANK YOU!

 

This photograph has achieved the following highest awards:

• THE GOLDEN ALBUM

• OMNIPRESENCE CERTIFICATE OF EXCELLENCE

Self portrait

Jean Jacques Henner. 1829-1905. Paris.

Route de Galfingue, vieux cerisier et croix. Galfingen road, old cherry tree and cross. 1876. .

Paris. Musée Jean Jacques Henner.

 

L'ESQUISSE ou L'ART DU FLOU

 

L'Art Moderne, annoncé bien avant le début du 20è siècle par les pré-impressionnistes, les impressionnistes et les post-impressionnistes, a été un facteur tout à fait remarquable de renouvellement des formes, dans la peinture européenne.

L'Art a toujours été, une manière de rêver le monde réel. Mais les nouvelles techniques de l'Art Moderne, s'éloignent toutes, de manière très intentionnelle, volontariste, de la représentation exacte du réel.

Les peintres tendent à créer un art dans lequel l'interprétation du réel l'emporte sur sa reproduction.

L'artiste moderne ne reproduit plus guère le réel, il le rêve, ou l'invente. Ces tendances ont abouti à l'art non figuratif, autrement appelé l'art abstrait.

Ce renouvellement des formes en peinture a apporté de nouvelles possibilités, très intéressantes, et très belles, d'expression artistique.

Parmi les techniques développées au cours du 19è siècle l'Esquisse a été une des meilleures expressions de l'Art du Flou.

L'Art du Flou a été pratiqué de manière géniale par Léonard de Vinci. Le "Sfumato" est, dans le cadre d'une peinture très figurative et parfaitement finie, comme la Joconde, les Vierges au rocher, ou Saint Jean Baptiste, une ébauche d'art du flou.

L'Esquisse a été dans l'histoire de la peinture un projet, une étude préparatoire, qui permettait à l'artiste de s'assurer de la cohérence et de l'équilibre de son tableau fini. Dans ce cas, le plus souvent, le flou n'est qu'une approximation, un brouillon, le témoin d'un art incomplet qui demande à être achevé.

Mais de nombreux artistes, au cours des siècles passés, ont parfaitement compris que l'esquisse pouvait, parfois, exceptionnellement, être une oeuvre achevée.

C'est à dire une oeuvre dont une grande majorité de spectateurs, experts ou non, ressentaient impérieusement que RIEN ne devait lui être ajoutée. Ce n'est pas une définition mathématique, mais c'est la meilleure.

L'esquisse n'est une oeuvre achevée que lorsqu'elle est créatrice d'une atmosphère singulière, particulièrement suggestive, porteuse d'une poésie qui lui est propre, unique. Quand il apparaît de manière évidente que plus de précision dans le dessin fermerait les portes à l'imaginaire, au mystère, et détruirait un équilibre subtile entre le rêve et la réalité.

Le dessin trop précis peut en effet fermer les portes à l'imaginaire, alors que le flou qui caractérise l'esquisse peut les ouvrir. Les photographes le savent bien aussi : Le flou peut être simplement flou, mais il peut aussi être une invitation à ressentir un mystère et à participer à une énigme. Le spectateur est invité à meubler par son imagination le flou qui lui est proposé.

Mais c'est une alchimie dont seuls les grands artistes, peuvent, exceptionnellement, pénétrer le secret.

Le grand maître de cette technique, et celui qui, le plus précocement, l'a poussé le plus loin, a été sans doute William Turner (1775-1851).

Delacroix a été aussi, un peu après Turner, un des grands précurseurs de l'art de l'esquisse. Par exemple dans la "mort de Sadarnapale" mais aussi dans bien d'autres tableaux. Mais Delacroix est aussi un exemple des limites de cette technique. Toutes les techniques rencontrent, à un moment ou à un autre, leurs limites.

L'Art de l'esquisse est redoutablement difficile, car il ne suffit pas de dessiner schématiquement un sujet pour faire une belle oeuvre. De même qu'en photographie de nos jours, il ne suffit pas de dessiner et de peindre flou pour créer une oeuvre d'art.

Le flou peut n'être qu'une esquisse ou une approximation, dont finalement la valeur marchande ne tient qu'à la signature d'un grand nom.

Il est vrai que l'esquisse peut dégager une certaine puissance expressive, avoir une puissance évocatrice, une poésie de l'inachevé. Une force expressive que le tableau, bien fini, bien dessiné et bien peint, achevé, peut effectivement perdre. Mais la magie poétique de l'art du flou ne peut pas être systématique.

Le flou, c'est aussi beaucoup une question de mode. Une habitude du regard. Une culture.

L'esthétique de notre époque est un peu trop focalisée sur l'esquisse.

On finit par ne plus voir que des esquisses dans les galeries de peintures modernes ou contemporaines.

En réalité les artistes ne sont pas les seuls responsables de cette situation. Au 19è siècle la société occidentale est entrée dans une culture qui fait de la réussite, matérielle, économique, et de l'Argent ses valeurs principales. Dès lors des esquisses, qui ne seraient pas sorties des brouillons personnels de l'artiste, pendant les siècles précédents, sont devenues de marchandises sources de profits. Ces marchandises, se trouvent même dans les musées. Picasso avait très bien compris ce mécanisme économique.

Bien sûr cette évolution est habillée de Grands Principes : Il n'est pas question d'Argent, mais de l'Artiste, de la Liberté de Création, du Progrès des Arts, d'une "sensibilité nouvelle", de "vivre avec son temps" etc...

Cette omniprésence de l'esquisse reflète non seulement des habitudes du regard mais des valeurs éthiques. L'Art du Flou est devenu aussi l'Art de faire, vite, de l'Argent.

Valeurs morales positives ou négatives. Nous vivons dans un monde un peu trop pressé !! Pour aller où ?

  

THE SKETCH OR THE ART OF BLUR

  

Modern Art, announced well before the beginning of the 20th century by the pré-impressionnists, impressionists and post-impressionists, was a factor quite remarkable renewal forms in European painting.

Art has always been a way to dream the real world. But the new techniques of modern art, are moving away all so very intentional, deliberate, of the exact representation of reality.

The painters tend to create an art in which the interpretation of reality trumps its reproduction.

The modern artist is hardly reproduces reality, it's dream or invent. These trends have resulted in non-figurative art, also called abstract art.

This renewal forms in painting is total. He brought new possibilities of artistic expression.

Among the techniques developed during the 19th century, the sketch was one of the best expressions of the Art of Blur.

The Art of Blur has been practiced ingeniously by Leonardo da Vinci. The "Sfumato" is in the context of a very figurative and perfectly finished painting, like the Mona Lisa, the Virgin on the rock, or John the Baptist, a draft of art of blur..

The sketch was in the history of painting, a project, a preparatory study, which allowed the artist to ensure the coherence and balance of the finished table. In this case, usually, the blur is only an approximation, a preform, a draft, witnessed an incomplete art which needs to be completed.

But many artists, over the centuries, have understood perfectly that the sketch was sometimes, exceptionally, be a finished work.

That is to say a work, of which a large majority of spectators, experts or not, imperiously felt that NOTHING was to be added to it. This is not a mathematical definition, but this is the best.

The sketch is a finished work, only when it is creative, from a singular atmosphere, particularly suggestive, carrying a single poetry. When he appears, with evidence, that more precision in drawing, closes the doors to the imagination, of the mystery, and destroy a subtle balance between dream and reality.

The tto precise drawing can, in fact, close the doors to the imagination. While the blur, characteristic of the sketch, can open these doors. The photographers also know well: The blur can be simply fuzzy, but it can also be an invitation to feel a mystery and to participate in an enigma. The viewer is invited to furnish the blur proposed to him, through his imagination.

But it is an alchemy that only great artists have exceptionally found the secret.

The great master of this technique that the earliest, pushed him, foremost, was William Turner (1775-1851).

Delacroix was also a little after Turner, one of the major precursors of the art of the sketch. For example in the "death of Sadarnapale" but also in many other paintings. But Delacroix is also an example of the limitations of this technique. All techniques meet, at one time or another, their limits.

The Art of the sketch is terribly difficult, because it is not enough to draw schematically a subject to make a beautiful work. It is not enough to draw and paint blur, or photographing blur, to create a work of art.

The blur can be only a sketch or an approximation, which ultimately market value is up to the signing of a big name.

It is true that the sketch can release a certain expressive power, have an evocative power, a poetry of unfinished. An expressive force that the painting, well finished, well designed and well painted, completed, can actually lose. But the poetic magic of Blur Art cannot be systematic.

It is also very much a question of fashion. A habit of look. A culture.

The aesthetics of our time is a little too focused on the sketch.

We finally see only sketches in the galleries of modern and contemporary paintings.

In fact the artists are not the solely responsibles, for this situation. In the 19th century Western society has entered a culture that makes of the success, physical, material, economic, and of money, its main values. Therefore the sketches, which would not come out of personal drafts of the artist, in previous centuries, have become merchandises, and sources of profits. These goods are found even in museums. Picasso understood very well, what economic mechanism.

Of course this evolution is dressed in Great Principles: There is no question of Money, but of the Artist, of the Freedom of Creation,of the Progress of the Arts, of a "new sensibility", "to live with her time "etc ...

This omnipresence of the sketch reflects not only the look but the habits of ethical values.

positive or negative moral values. The Art of the blur has also become the Art to do, quickly, of the money.

We live in a world too pressed !! To go where ?

   

Jean Jacques Henner. 1829-1905. Paris.

Paysage de la Doller. Landscape of the Doller. vers 1900.

Paris. Musée Jean Jacques Henner.

 

Un tableau intéressant. Il n'est pas indiqué comme étant une esquisse. Il est tout de même fort audacieux en 1900. C'est un exemple d'oeuvre d'art qui démontre que l'esquisse peut avoir une beauté particulière, tout à fait originale. L'esquisse n'est plus seulement une oeuvre préparatoire, elle est une oeuvre achevée. Et esthétiquement, elle peut même être meilleure qu'un tableau achevé. Mais il ne faut pas se tromper cela demeure rare.

 

An interesting picture. It is not indicated as a sketch. It is still very audacious in 1900. It is an example of a work of art that demonstrates that the sketch can have a particular beauty, quite original. The sketch is not only a preparatory work, it is a finished work. And aesthetically, it can even be better than a finished painting. But it should not be deceived that remains rare.

 

L'ESQUISSE ou L'ART DU FLOU

 

L'Art Moderne, annoncé bien avant le début du 20è siècle par les pré-impressionnistes, les impressionnistes et les post-impressionnistes, a été un facteur tout à fait remarquable de renouvellement des formes, dans la peinture européenne.

L'Art a toujours été, une manière de rêver le monde réel. Mais les nouvelles techniques de l'Art Moderne, s'éloignent toutes, de manière très intentionnelle, volontariste, de la représentation exacte du réel.

Les peintres tendent à créer un art dans lequel l'interprétation du réel l'emporte sur sa reproduction.

L'artiste moderne ne reproduit plus guère le réel, il le rêve, ou l'invente. Ces tendances ont abouti à l'art non figuratif, autrement appelé l'art abstrait.

Ce renouvellement des formes en peinture a apporté de nouvelles possibilités, très intéressantes, et très belles, d'expression artistique.

Parmi les techniques développées au cours du 19è siècle l'Esquisse a été une des meilleures expressions de l'Art du Flou.

L'Art du Flou a été pratiqué de manière géniale par Léonard de Vinci. Le "Sfumato" est, dans le cadre d'une peinture très figurative et parfaitement finie, comme la Joconde, les Vierges au rocher, ou Saint Jean Baptiste, une ébauche d'art du flou.

L'Esquisse a été dans l'histoire de la peinture un projet, une étude préparatoire, qui permettait à l'artiste de s'assurer de la cohérence et de l'équilibre de son tableau fini. Dans ce cas, le plus souvent, le flou n'est qu'une approximation, un brouillon, le témoin d'un art incomplet qui demande à être achevé.

Mais de nombreux artistes, au cours des siècles passés, ont parfaitement compris que l'esquisse pouvait, parfois, exceptionnellement, être une oeuvre achevée.

C'est à dire une oeuvre dont une grande majorité de spectateurs, experts ou non, ressentaient impérieusement que RIEN ne devait lui être ajoutée. Ce n'est pas une définition mathématique, mais c'est la meilleure.

L'esquisse n'est une oeuvre achevée que lorsqu'elle est créatrice d'une atmosphère singulière, particulièrement suggestive, porteuse d'une poésie qui lui est propre, unique. Quand il apparaît de manière évidente que plus de précision dans le dessin fermerait les portes à l'imaginaire, au mystère, et détruirait un équilibre subtile entre le rêve et la réalité.

Le dessin trop précis peut en effet fermer les portes à l'imaginaire, alors que le flou qui caractérise l'esquisse peut les ouvrir. Les photographes le savent bien aussi : Le flou peut être simplement flou, mais il peut aussi être une invitation à ressentir un mystère et à participer à une énigme. Le spectateur est invité à meubler par son imagination le flou qui lui est proposé.

Mais c'est une alchimie dont seuls les grands artistes, peuvent, exceptionnellement, pénétrer le secret.

Le grand maître de cette technique, et celui qui, le plus précocement, l'a poussé le plus loin, a été sans doute William Turner (1775-1851).

Delacroix a été aussi, un peu après Turner, un des grands précurseurs de l'art de l'esquisse. Par exemple dans la "mort de Sadarnapale" mais aussi dans bien d'autres tableaux. Mais Delacroix est aussi un exemple des limites de cette technique. Toutes les techniques rencontrent, à un moment ou à un autre, leurs limites.

L'Art de l'esquisse est redoutablement difficile, car il ne suffit pas de dessiner schématiquement un sujet pour faire une belle oeuvre. De même qu'en photographie de nos jours, il ne suffit pas de dessiner et de peindre flou pour créer une oeuvre d'art.

Le flou peut n'être qu'une esquisse ou une approximation, dont finalement la valeur marchande ne tient qu'à la signature d'un grand nom.

Il est vrai que l'esquisse peut dégager une certaine puissance expressive, avoir une puissance évocatrice, une poésie de l'inachevé. Une force expressive que le tableau, bien fini, bien dessiné et bien peint, achevé, peut effectivement perdre. Mais la magie poétique de l'art du flou ne peut pas être systématique.

Le flou, c'est aussi beaucoup une question de mode. Une habitude du regard. Une culture.

L'esthétique de notre époque est un peu trop focalisée sur l'esquisse.

On finit par ne plus voir que des esquisses dans les galeries de peintures modernes ou contemporaines.

En réalité les artistes ne sont pas les seuls responsables de cette situation. Au 19è siècle la société occidentale est entrée dans une culture qui fait de la réussite, matérielle, économique, et de l'Argent ses valeurs principales. Dès lors des esquisses, qui ne seraient pas sorties des brouillons personnels de l'artiste, pendant les siècles précédents, sont devenues de marchandises sources de profits. Ces marchandises, se trouvent même dans les musées. Picasso avait très bien compris ce mécanisme économique.

Bien sûr cette évolution est habillée de Grands Principes : Il n'est pas question d'Argent, mais de l'Artiste, de la Liberté de Création, du Progrès des Arts, d'une "sensibilité nouvelle", de "vivre avec son temps" etc...

Cette omniprésence de l'esquisse reflète non seulement des habitudes du regard mais des valeurs éthiques. L'Art du Flou est devenu aussi l'Art de faire, vite, de l'Argent.

Valeurs morales positives ou négatives. Nous vivons dans un monde un peu trop pressé !! Pour aller où ?

  

THE SKETCH OR THE ART OF BLUR

  

Modern Art, announced well before the beginning of the 20th century by the pré-impressionnists, impressionists and post-impressionists, was a factor quite remarkable renewal forms in European painting.

Art has always been a way to dream the real world. But the new techniques of modern art, are moving away all so very intentional, deliberate, of the exact representation of reality.

The painters tend to create an art in which the interpretation of reality trumps its reproduction.

The modern artist is hardly reproduces reality, it's dream or invent. These trends have resulted in non-figurative art, also called abstract art.

This renewal forms in painting is total. He brought new possibilities of artistic expression.

Among the techniques developed during the 19th century, the sketch was one of the best expressions of the Art of Blur.

The Art of Blur has been practiced ingeniously by Leonardo da Vinci. The "Sfumato" is in the context of a very figurative and perfectly finished painting, like the Mona Lisa, the Virgin on the rock, or John the Baptist, a draft of art of blur..

The sketch was in the history of painting, a project, a preparatory study, which allowed the artist to ensure the coherence and balance of the finished table. In this case, usually, the blur is only an approximation, a preform, a draft, witnessed an incomplete art which needs to be completed.

But many artists, over the centuries, have understood perfectly that the sketch was sometimes, exceptionally, be a finished work.

That is to say a work, of which a large majority of spectators, experts or not, imperiously felt that NOTHING was to be added to it. This is not a mathematical definition, but this is the best.

The sketch is a finished work, only when it is creative, from a singular atmosphere, particularly suggestive, carrying a single poetry. When he appears, with evidence, that more precision in drawing, closes the doors to the imagination, of the mystery, and destroy a subtle balance between dream and reality.

The tto precise drawing can, in fact, close the doors to the imagination. While the blur, characteristic of the sketch, can open these doors. The photographers also know well: The blur can be simply fuzzy, but it can also be an invitation to feel a mystery and to participate in an enigma. The viewer is invited to furnish the blur proposed to him, through his imagination.

But it is an alchemy that only great artists have exceptionally found the secret.

The great master of this technique that the earliest, pushed him, foremost, was William Turner (1775-1851).

Delacroix was also a little after Turner, one of the major precursors of the art of the sketch. For example in the "death of Sadarnapale" but also in many other paintings. But Delacroix is also an example of the limitations of this technique. All techniques meet, at one time or another, their limits.

The Art of the sketch is terribly difficult, because it is not enough to draw schematically a subject to make a beautiful work. It is not enough to draw and paint blur, or photographing blur, to create a work of art.

The blur can be only a sketch or an approximation, which ultimately market value is up to the signing of a big name.

It is true that the sketch can release a certain expressive power, have an evocative power, a poetry of unfinished. An expressive force that the painting, well finished, well designed and well painted, completed, can actually lose. But the poetic magic of Blur Art cannot be systematic.

It is also very much a question of fashion. A habit of look. A culture.

The aesthetics of our time is a little too focused on the sketch.

We finally see only sketches in the galleries of modern and contemporary paintings.

In fact the artists are not the solely responsibles, for this situation. In the 19th century Western society has entered a culture that makes of the success, physical, material, economic, and of money, its main values. Therefore the sketches, which would not come out of personal drafts of the artist, in previous centuries, have become merchandises, and sources of profits. These goods are found even in museums. Picasso understood very well, what economic mechanism.

Of course this evolution is dressed in Great Principles: There is no question of Money, but of the Artist, of the Freedom of Creation,of the Progress of the Arts, of a "new sensibility", "to live with her time "etc ...

This omnipresence of the sketch reflects not only the look but the habits of ethical values.

positive or negative moral values. The Art of the blur has also become the Art to do, quickly, of the money.

We live in a world too pressed !! To go where ?

   

De toutes les églises de Rome, une seule est considérée comme étant la « mère et tête de toutes les églises » : la basilique Saint-Jean de Latran, cathédrale de Rome, siège du diocèse de la Ville.

 

Cette église fondamentale du Catholicisme est propriété du Saint-Siège et fait donc partie du Vatican (même si elle ne se trouve pas sur le territoire du Vatican). C’est une des quatre basiliques majeures de Rome, et ne l’est pas que par la taille : 12 conciles y eurent lieu, dont 5 œcuméniques tout au long du Moyen-âge et de la Renaissance (1123, 1139, 1179, 1215 et de 1512 à 1516). C’est aussi au Latran que Charlemagne se fit baptiser, à Pâques en 774, ou que les fameux accords entre l’Eglise et l’Etat furent signés en 1929, les accords du Latran.

L’Archibasilique du Très Saint-Sauveur, plus connue sous le nom de Basilique de Saint-Jean de Latran, est l’église la plus ancienne de la ville, construite avant même Saint Pierre de Rome. L’empereur Constantin Ier (306-337) l’a fit construire, selon la légende, après avoir guéri d’une maladie en 313, et sera consacrée en 324 par le pape Sylvestre Ier. C’est l’église utilisée par le pape, lorsqu’il assume le rôle d’évêque de la Ville Éternelle. Elle est bâtie sur les anciens terrains d’une ancienne famille patricienne, les Laterani, qui donnèrent ainsi leur nom à l’église, Latran. Sainte Hélène, la mère de Constantin, chrétienne très fervente, avait fait cadeau des terrains au pape de l’époque, Melchiade.

Avant le renouveau de Saint-Pierre de Rome, à la Renaissance, le siège de la Chrétienté était au Latran. Pendant 1000 ans, du IVe au XIVe siècle, le pape y avait sa résidence, son siège, jusqu’à l’« exil » de Clément V à Avignon, en 1309. L’ancienne résidence papale est encore visible, le Palais de Latran, que l’on peut voir collé à la basilique, reconverti en musée par le pape Grégoire XVI. L’église avec tant de reconstructions, eu forcément des besoins financiers importants. Les rois de France contribuèrent au financement, depuis Louis XI au XVe siècle, de façon plus ou moins régulière suivant les aléas de l’Histoire, jusqu’en 1871. Henri IV, en échange de l’assurance des revenus provenant de l’Abbaye de Clairac pour le Latran, fut remercié avec une statue que l’on peut encore voir de nos jours, et le dirigeant français fut fait chanoine d’honneur. Aujourd’hui, le Président de la République, quel qu’il soit est ainsi systématiquement fait chanoine d’honneur de la basilique Saint-Jean de Latran.

L’église que nous pouvons admirer aujourd’hui date du XVIIe siècle, sous le pontificat d’Urbain V, et est la deuxième plus grande église de Rome, avec ses 130m de long. La façade blanche réalisée entre 1732 et 1735, toute en travertin, fut conçue par le Florentin Alessandro Galilei, avec les statues monumentales en son sommet. Ces statues de 7m de haut représentent Jésus, Saint Jean et Saint Jean-Baptiste, ainsi que les docteurs de l’église. La gigantesque porte de bronze est une porte antique, qui n’est autre que celle de l’ancienne Curie romaine ! Sur le fronton, nous pouvons y lire « omnium urbis et orbis ecclesiarum mater et caput », mère et tête de toutes les églises de la ville et du monde.

 

La structure intérieure de la basilique est l’œuvre de Francesco Borromini, exécutée en style baroque. Les travaux débutèrent lors de l’année sainte, le Jubilé de 1650, commandés par le pape Innocent X. Des 14 arcades originelles, il passa à 5, retravaillant ainsi totalement l’espace intérieur de la basilique, qui retrouva l’esprit de l’édifice antique, avec ses 5 nefs. Dans chaque niche de la nef, longue de 130m, nous pouvons voir les statues des apôtres qui regardent les fidèles venus à l’église. Ces statues furent sculptées entre 1703 et 1719. Les chapelles latérales sont également issues du génie de Borromini. Le jeu de lumières que Borromini a su créer est bluffant, avec la lumière qui rentre par les fenêtres, tels des puits de lumière. Cette lumière si spéciale renforce le coté sacré de cet endroit. Borromini conservera le sol, venu du Moyen-âge, et le plafond, en caissons peints et moulures dorées, du bois sculpté du XVIe siècle.

Le sol de la basilique mérite toute l’attention du monde. C’est un sol que l’on nomme de « cosmatesque ». Ce type de sol, fait d’innombrables morceaux de marbre, était typique de l’Italie du Moyen-âge, friande de ce type de mosaïque. Le nom vient de Laurent Cosma et de sa famille, les Cosmati, des artisans qui créèrent bon nombre de ces œuvres, en prélevant le marbre des ruines romaines antiques. Ces sols sont absolument splendides, m’impressionnant beaucoup plus que toutes les statues de l’église : on n’a pas l’habitude de marcher sur quelque chose de si beau, et son omniprésence donne cet aspect chaleureux à Saint Jean de Latran, bien différent des sols en pierre des cathédrales gothiques.

 

Of all the churches in Rome, only one is considered the "mother and head of all churches": the Basilica of St. John Lateran, cathedral of Rome, seat of the diocese of the City.

 

This fundamental church of Catholicism is property of the Holy See and therefore part of the Vatican (even if it is not located on Vatican territory). It is one of the four major basilicas of Rome, and it is not only because of the size: 12 councils took place, including 5 ecumenical throughout the Middle Ages and the Renaissance (1123, 1139, 1179, 1215 and from 1512 to 1516). It is also in the Lateran that Charlemagne was baptized, at Easter in 774, or that the famous agreements between the Church and the State were signed in 1929, the Lateran agreements.

The Archibasilica of the Most Holy Savior, better known as the Basilica of St. John Lateran, is the oldest church in the city, built even before St. Peter of Rome. Emperor Constantine I (306-337) had it built, according to legend, after curing a disease in 313, and will be consecrated in 324 by Pope Sylvester I. This is the church used by the pope when he assumes the role of bishop of the Eternal City. It is built on the old grounds of an old patrician family, the Laterani, which gave their name to the church, Lateran. St. Helena, the mother of Constantine, a very fervent Christian, had given the land to the pope of the time, Melchiade.

Before the revival of St. Peter's in Rome, during the Renaissance, the siege of Christendom was at the Lateran. For 1000 years, from the fourth to the fourteenth century, the pope had his residence, his seat, until the "exile" of Clement V in Avignon, in 1309. The former papal residence is still visible, the Lateran Palace , which can be seen stuck to the basilica, converted into a museum by Pope Gregory XVI. The church with so many reconstructions, had necessarily important financial needs. The kings of France contributed to the financing, since Louis XI in the 15th century, in a more or less regular way according to the vagaries of the History, until 1871. Henry IV, in exchange for the insurance of the revenues coming from the Abbey from Clairac to the Lateran, was thanked with a statue that can still be seen today, and the French leader was made canon of honor. Today, the President of the Republic, whoever he is is thus systematically made canon of honor of the basilica Saint-Jean of Lateran.

The church that we can admire today dates from the seventeenth century, under the pontificate of Urban V, and is the second largest church in Rome, with its 130m long. The white facade built between 1732 and 1735, all travertine, was designed by the Florentine Alessandro Galilei, with the monumental statues at the top. These statues 7m high represent Jesus, Saint John and Saint John the Baptist, as well as the doctors of the church. The gigantic bronze door is an ancient door, which is none other than that of the ancient Roman Curia! On the pediment, we can read "omnium urbis and orbis ecclesiarum mater and caput", mother and head of all the churches of the city and the world.

The inner structure of the basilica is the work of Francesco Borromini, executed in Baroque style. Work began during the holy year, the Jubilee of 1650, commissioned by Pope Innocent X. Of the 14 original arcades, he went to 5, thus completely reworking the interior space of the basilica, which found the spirit of the ancient building, with its 5 naves. In each niche of the nave, 130m long, we can see the statues of the apostles who watch the faithful coming to the church. These statues were carved between 1703 and 1719. The side chapels are also from the genius of Borromini. The play of lights that Borromini has created is stunning, with the light coming in through the windows, like skylights. This special light reinforces the sacred side of this place. Borromini will preserve the soil, from the Middle Ages, and the ceiling, in painted boxes and gilded moldings, carved wood of the sixteenth century.

The basilica floor deserves all the attention of the world. It is a soil that we call "cosmatesque". This type of floor, made of innumerable pieces of marble, was typical of medieval Italy, fond of this type of mosaic. The name comes from Laurent Cosma and his family, the Cosmati, craftsmen who created many of these works, taking marble from the ancient Roman ruins. These soils are absolutely splendid, impressing me much more than all the statues of the church: we are not used to walking on something so beautiful, and its omnipresence gives this warm aspect to Saint Jean de Latran, very different from the stone floors of Gothic cathedrals.

Narasimha (Sanskrit: नरसिंह IAST: Narasiṁha, lit. man-lion), Narasingh, Narsingh and Narasingha in derivative languages is an avatar of the Hindu god Vishnu and one of Hinduism's most popular deities, as evidenced in early epics, iconography, and temple and festival worship for over a millennium.

 

Narasiṁha is often visualised as having a human-like torso and lower body, with a lion-like face and claws. This image is widely worshipped in deity form by a significant number of Vaiṣṇava groups. Vishnu assumed this form on top of Himvat mountain (Harivamsa). He is known primarily as the 'Great Protector' who specifically defends and protects his devotees in times of need. Vishnu is believed to have taken the avatar to destroy the demon king Hiranyakashipu.

 

ETYMOLOGY

The word Narasimha means 'lion-man' which usually means 'half man and half lion'. His other names are:

 

- Agnilochana (अग्निलोचन) - the one who has fiery eyes

- Bhairavadambara (भैरवडम्बर) - the one who causes terror by roaring

- Karala (कराल) - the one who has a wide mouth and projecting teeth

- Hiranyakashipudvamsa (हिरण्यकशिपुध्वंस) - the one who killed Hiranyakashipu

- Nakhastra (नखास्त्र) - the one for whom nails are his weapons

- Sinhavadana (सिंहवदन) - the whose face is of lion

- Mrigendra (मृगेन्द्र) - king of animals or lion

 

SCRIPTURAL SOURCES

There are references to Narasiṁha in a variety of Purāṇas, with 17 different versions of the main narrative. The Bhagavata Purāṇa (Canto 7), Agni Purāṇa (4.2-3), Brahmāṇḍa Purāṇa(2.5.3-29), Vayu Purāṇa (67.61-66), Harivaṁśa (41 & 3.41-47), Brahma-Purāṇa (213.44-79), Viṣṇudharmottara Purāṇa(1.54), Kūrma Purāṇa (1.15.18-72), Matsya Purāṇa(161-163), Padma Purāṇa(Uttara-khaṇḍa 5.42), Śiva Purāṇa (2.5.43 & 3.10-12), Liṅga Purāṇa (1.95-96), Skanda Purāṇa 7 (2.18.60-130) and Viṣṇu Purāṇa (1.16-20) all contain depictions of the Narasiṁha Avatāra. There is also a short reference in the Mahābhārata (3.272.56-60) and a Gopāla Tapani Upaniṣad (Narasiṁha tapani Upaniṣad), earliest of Vaiṣṇava Upaniṣads named in reference to him.

 

REFERENCES FROM VEDAS

The Ṛg Veda contains an epithet that has been attributed to Narasiṁha. The half-man, half-lion avatāra is described as:

 

- like some wild beast, dread, prowling, mountain-roaming.

 

Source: (RV.I 154.2a).

 

There is an allusion to a Namuci story in RV.VIII 14.13:

 

- With waters' foam you tore off, Indra, the head of Namuci, subduing all contending hosts.

 

This short reference is believed to have culminated in the full puranic story of Narasiṁha.

 

LORD NARASIMHA AND PRAHLADA

Bhagavata Purāṇa describes that in his previous avatar as Varāha, Viṣṇu killed the asura Hiraṇayakṣa. The younger brother of Hirṇayakṣa, Hiraṇyakaśipu wanted revenge on Viṣṇu and his followers. He undertook many years of austere penance to take revenge on Viṣṇu: Brahma thus offers the demon a boon and Hiraṇyakaśipu asks for immortality. Brahma tells him this is not possible, but that he could bind the death of Hiraṇyakaśipu with conditions. Hiraṇyakaśipu agreed:

 

- O my lord, O best of the givers of benediction, if you will kindly grant me the benediction I desire, please let me not meet death from any of the living entities created by you.

 

- Grant me that I not die within any residence or outside any residence, during the daytime or at night, nor on the ground or in the sky. Grant me that my death not be brought about by any weapon, nor by any human being or animal.

- Grant me that I not meet death from any entity, living or nonliving created by you. Grant me, further, that I not be killed by any demigod or demon or by any great snake from the lower planets. Since no one can kill you in the battlefield, you have no competitor. Therefore, grant me the benediction that I too may have no rival. Give me sole lordship over all the living entities and presiding deities, and give me all the glories obtained by that position. Furthermore, give me all the mystic powers attained by long austerities and the practice of yoga, for these cannot be lost at any time.

 

Brahma said,

Tathāstu (so be it) and vanished. Hiraṇyakaśipu was happy thinking that he had won over death.

 

One day while Hiraṇyakaśipu performed austerities at Mandarācala Mountain, his home was attacked by Indra and the other devatās. At this point the Devarṣi (divine sage) Nārada intervenes to protect Kayādu, whom he describes as sinless. Following this event, Nārada takes Kayādu into his care and while under the guidance of Nārada, her unborn child (Hiraṇyakaśipu's son) Prahālada, becomes affected by the transcendental instructions of the sage even at such a young stage of development. Thus, Prahlāda later begins to show symptoms of this earlier training by Nārada, gradually becoming recognised as a devoted follower of Viṣṇu, much to his father's disappointment.

 

Hiraṇyakaśipu furious at the devotion of his son to Viṣṇu, as the god had killed his brother. Finally, he decides to commit filicide. but each time he attempts to kill the boy, Prahlāda is protected by Viṣṇu's mystical power. When asked, Prahlāda refuses to acknowledge his father as the supreme lord of the universe and claims that Viṣṇu is all-pervading and omnipresent.

 

Hiraṇyakaśipu points to a nearby pillar and asks if 'his Viṣṇu' is in it and says to his son Prahlāda:

O most unfortunate Prahlāda, you have always described a supreme being other than me, a supreme being who is above everything, who is the controller of everyone, and who is all-pervading. But where is He? If He is everywhere, then why is He not present before me in this pillar?

 

Prahlāda then answers,

He was, He is and He will be.

 

In an alternate version of the story, Prahlāda answers,

He is in pillars, and he is in the smallest twig.

 

Hiraṇyakaśipu, unable to control his anger, smashes the pillar with his mace, and following a tumultuous sound, Viṣṇu in the form of Narasiṁha appears from it and moves to attack Hiraṇyakaśipu. in defence of Prahlāda. In order to kill Hiraṇyakaśipu and not upset the boon given by Brahma, the form of Narasiṁha is chosen. Hiraṇyakaśipu can not be killed by human, deva or animal. Narasiṁha is neither one of these as he is a form of Viṣṇu incarnate as a part-human, part-animal. He comes upon Hiraṇyakaśipu at twilight (when it is neither day nor night) on the threshold of a courtyard (neither indoors nor out), and puts the demon on his thighs (neither earth nor space). Using his sharp fingernails (neither animate nor inanimate) as weapons, he disembowels and kills the demon.

 

Kūrma Purāṇa describes the preceding battle between the Puruṣa and demonic forces in which he escapes a powerful weapon called Paśupāta and it describes how Prahlāda's brothers headed by Anuhrāda and thousands of other demons were led to the valley of death (yamalayam) by the lion produced from the body of man-lion avatar. The same episode occurs in the Matsya Purāṇa 179, several chapters after its version of the Narasiṁha advent.

 

It is said that even after killing Hiraṇyakaśipu, none of the present demigods are able to calm Narasiṁha's wrath.So the demigods requested Prahlada to calm down the Lord,and Narasimha,who had assumed the all-powerful form of Gandaberunda returned to more benevolent form after that. In other stories,all the gods and goddesses call his consort, Lakṣmī, who assumes the form of Pratyangira and pacifies the Lord. According to a few scriptures, at the request of Brahma, Shiva took the form of Sharabha and successfully pacified him. Before parting, Narasiṁha rewards the wise Prahlāda by crowning him as the king.

 

NARASIMHA AND ADI SANKARA

Narasiṁha is also a protector of his devotees in times of danger. Near Śrī Śailaṁ, there is a forest called Hatakeśvanam, that no man enters. Śaṅkarācārya entered this place and did penance for many days. During this time, a Kāpālika, by name Kirakashan appeared before him.

 

He told Śrī Śaṅkara that he should give his body as a human-sacrifice to Kālī. Śaṅkara happily agreed. His disciples were shocked to hear this and pleaded with Śaṅkara to change his mind, but he refused to do so saying that it was an honor to give up his body as a sacrifice for Kālī and one must not lament such things. The Kāpālika arranged a fire for the sacrifice and Śaṅkara sat beside it. Just as he lifted his axe to severe the head of Śaṅkara, Viṣṇu as Narasiṁha entered the body of the disciple of Śaṅkarācārya and Narasiṁha devotee, Padmapada. He then fought the Kāpālika, slayed him and freed the forest of Kapalikas. Ādi Śaṅkara composed the powerful Lakṣmī-Narasiṁha Karāvalambaṁ Stotram at the very spot in front of Lord Narasiṁha.

 

MODE OF WORSHIP

Due to the nature of Narasiṁha's form (divine anger), it is essential that worship be given with a very high level of attention compared to other deities. In many temples only lifelong celibates (Brahmācārya) will be able to have the chance to serve as priests to perform the daily puja. Forms where Narasiṁha appears sitting in a yogic posture, or with the goddess Lakṣmī are the exception to this rule, as Narasiṁha is taken as being more relaxed in both of these instances compared to his form when first emerging from the pillar to protect Prahlāda.

 

PRAYERS

A number of prayers have been written in dedication to Narasiṁha avatāra. These include:

 

- The Narasiṁha Mahā-Mantra

- Narasiṁha Praṇāma Prayer

- Daśāvatāra Stotra by Jayadeva

- Kāmaśikha Aṣṭakam by Vedānta Deśika

- Divya Prabandham 2954

- Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Karavalamba Stotram by Sri Adi Sankara

 

THE NARASIMHA MAHA-MANTRA

- oṁ hrīṁ kṣauṁ

- ugraṁ viraṁ mahāviṣṇuṁ

- jvalantaṁ sarvatomukham ।

- nṛsiṁhaṁ bhīṣaṇaṁ bhadraṁ

- mṛtyormṛtyuṁ namāmyaham ॥

 

O' Angry and brave Mahā-Viṣṇu, your heat and fire permeate everywhere. O Lord Narasiṁha, you are everywhere. You are the death of death and I surrender to You.

 

NARASIMHA PRANAMA PRAYER

namaste narasiṁhāya,

prahlādahlāda-dāyine,

hiraṇyakaśipor vakṣaḥ,

śilā-ṭaṅka nakhālaye

 

I offer my obeisances to Lord Narasiṁha, who gives joy to Prahlāda Mahārāja and whose nails are like chisels on the stone like chest of the demon Hiraṇyakaśipu.

 

ito nṛsiṁhaḥ parato nṛsiṁho,

yato yato yāmi tato nṛsiṁhaḥ,

bahir nṛsiṁho hṛdaye nṛsiṁho,

nṛsiṁhaṁ ādiṁ śaraṇaṁ prapadye

 

Lord Nṛsiṁha is here and also there. Wherever I go Lord Narasiṁha is there. He is in the heart and is outside as well. I surrender to Lord Narasiṁha, the origin of all things and the supreme refuge.

 

DASAVATARA STOTRA BY JAYADEVA

tava kara-kamala-vare nakham adbhuta-śrṅgaṁ,

dalita-hiraṇyakaśipu-tanu-bhṛṅgam,

keśava dhṛta-narahari-rūpa jaya jagadiśa hare

 

O Keśava! O Lord of the universe. O Hari, who have assumed the form of half-man, half-lion! All glories to You! Just as one can easily crush a wasp between one's fingernails, so in the same way the body of the wasp-like demon Hiraṇyakaśipu has been ripped apart by the wonderful pointed nails on your beautiful lotus hands. (from the Daśāvatāra-stotra composed by Jayadeva)

 

KAMASIKHA ASTAKAM BY VEDANTA DESIKA

tvayi rakṣati rakṣakaiḥ kimanyaiḥ,

tvayi cārakṣāti rakṣākaiḥ kimanyaiḥ ।

iti niścita dhīḥ śrayāmi nityaṁ,

nṛhare vegavatī taṭāśrayaṁ tvam ॥8॥

 

O Kāmaśikhā Narasiṁha! you are sarva śakthan. When you are resolved to protect some one, where is the need to seek the protection of anyone else? When you are resolved not to protect some one, which other person is capable of protecting us?. There is no one. Knowing this fundamental truth, I have resolved to offer my śaraṇāgatī at your lotus feet alone that rest at the banks of Vegavatī river.

 

DIVYA PRABANDHAM 2954

āḍi āḍi agam karaindhu isai

pāḍip pāḍik kaṇṇīr malgi engum

nāḍi nāḍi narasingā endru,

vāḍi vāḍum ivvāl nuthale!

 

I will dance and melt for you, within my heart, to see you, I will sing in praise of you with tears in joy, I will search for Narasiṁha and I am a householder who still searches to reach you (to attain Salvation).

 

SYMBOLISM

Narasiṁha indicates God's omnipresence and the lesson is that God is everywhere. For more information, see Vaishnav Theology.

 

Narasiṁha demonstrates God's willingness and ability to come to the aid of His devotees, no matter how difficult or impossible the circumstances may appear to be.

 

Prahlāda's devotion indicates that pure devotion is not one of birthright but of character. Prahlāda, although born an asura, demonstrated the greatest bhakti to God, and endured much, without losing faith.

 

Narasiṁha is known by the epithet Mṛga-Śarīra in Sanskrit which translates to Animal-Man. From a philosophical perspective. Narasiṁha is the very icon of Vaiṣṇavism, where jñāna (knowledge) and Bhakti are important as opposed to Advaita, which has no room for Bhakti, as the object to be worshipped and the worshipper do not exist. As according to Advaita or Māyāvāda, the jīva is Paramātma.

 

SIGNIFICANCE

In South Indian art – sculptures, bronzes and paintings – Viṣṇu's incarnation as Narasiṁha is one of the most chosen themes and amongst [[Avatar] |Avatāra]]s perhaps next only to Rāma and Kṛṣṇa in popularity.

 

Lord Narasiṁha also appears as one of Hanuman's 5 faces, who is a significant character in the Rāmāyaṇa as Lord (Rāma's) devotee.

  

FORMS OF NARASIMHA

There are several forms of Narasiṁha, but 9 main ones collectively known as Nava-narasiṁha:

Ugra-narasiṁha

Kroddha-narasiṁha

Vīra-narasiṁha

Vilamba-narasiṁha

Kopa-narasiṁha

Yoga-narasiṁha

Aghora-narasiṁha

Sudarśana-narasiṁha

Lakṣmī-narasiṁha

 

In Ahobilam, Andhra Pradesh, the nine forms are as follows:

Chātra-vata-narasiṁha (seated under a banyan tree)

Yogānanda-narasiṁha (who blessed Lord Brahma)

Karañja-narasiṁha

Uha-narasiṁha

Ugra-narasiṁha

Krodha-narasiṁha

Malola-narasiṁha (With Lakṣmī on His lap)

Jvālā-narasiṁha (an eight armed form rushing out of the pillar)

Pavana-narasiṁha (who blessed the sage Bharadvaja)

 

Forms from Prahlad story:

Stambha-narasiṁha (coming out of the pillar)

Svayam-narasiṁha (manifesting on His own)

Grahaṇa-narasiṁha (catching hold of the demon)

Vidāraṇa-narasiṁha (ripping open of the belly of the demon)

Saṁhāra-narasiṁha (killing the demon)

 

The following three refer to His ferocious aspect:

Ghora-narasiṁha

Ugra-narasiṁha

Candā-narasiṁha

 

OTHERS

Pañcamukha-Hanumān-narasiṁha, (appears as one of Śrī Hanuman's five faces.)

Pṛthvī-narasiṁha, Vayu-narasiṁha, Ākāśa-narasiṁha, Jvalana-narasiṁha, and

Amṛta-narasiṁha, (representing the five elements)

Jvālā-narasiṁha (with a flame-like mane)

Lakṣmī-narasiṁha (where Lakṣmī pacifies Him)

Prasāda/Prahlāda-varadā-narasiṁha (His benign aspect of protecting Prahlad)

Chatrā-narasiṁha (seated under a parasol of a five-hooded serpent)

Yoga-narasiṁha or Yogeśvara-narasiṁha (in meditation)

Āveśa-narasiṁha (a frenzied form)

Aṭṭahasa-narasiṁha (a form that roars horribly and majestically strides across to destroy evil)

Cakra-narasiṁha, (with only a discus in hand)

Viṣṇu-narasiṁha, Brahma-narasiṁha and Rudra-narasiṁha

Puṣṭi narasiṁha, (worshipped for overcoming evil influences)

 

EARLY IMAGES

In Andhra Pradesh, a panel dating to third-fourth century AD shows a full theriomorphic squatting lion with two extra human arms behind his shoulders holding Vaiṣṇava emblems. This lion, flanked by five heroes (vīra), often has been identified as an early depiction of Narasiṁha. Standing cult images of Narasiṁha from the early Gupta period, survive from temples at Tigowa and Eran. These sculptures are two-armed, long maned, frontal, wearing only a lower garment, and with no demon-figure of Hiraṇyakaśipu. Images representing the narrative of Narasiṁha slaying the demon Hiraṇyakaśipu survive from slightly later Gupta-period temples: one at Madhia and one from a temple-doorway now set into the Kūrma-maṭha at Nachna, both dated to the late fifth or early sixth century A.D.

 

An image of Narasiṁha supposedly dating to second-third century AD sculpted at Mathura was acquired by the Philadelphia Museum of Art in 1987. It was described by Stella Kramrisch, the former Philadelphia Museum of Art's Indian curator, as "perhaps the earliest image of Narasiṁha as yet known". This figure depicts a furled brow, fangs, and lolling tongue similar to later images of Narasiṁha, but the idol's robe, simplicity, and stance set it apart. On Narasiṁha's chest under his upper garment appears the suggestion of an amulet, which Stella Kramrisch associated with Visnu's cognizance, the Kauṣtubha jewel. This upper garment flows over both shoulders; but below Hiranyakasipu, the demon-figure placed horizontally across Narasiṁha's body, a twisted waist-band suggests a separate garment covering the legs. The demon's hair streams behind him, cushioning his head against the man-lion's right knee. He wears a simple single strand of beads. His body seems relaxed, even pliant. His face is calm, with a slight suggestion of a smile. His eyes stare adoringly up at the face of Viṣṇu. There is little tension in this figure's legs or feet, even as Narasiṁha gently disembowels him. His innards spill along his right side. As the Matsya purana describes it, Narasiṁha ripped "apart the mighty Daitya chief as a plaiter of straw mats shreds his reeds". Based on the Gandhara-style of robe worn by the idol, Michael Meiste altered the date of the image to fourth century AD.

 

Deborah Soifer, a scholar who worked on texts in relation to Narasiṁha, believes that "the traits basic to Viṣṇu in the Veda remain central to Viṣṇu in his avataras" and points out, however, that:

 

we have virtually no precursors in the Vedic material for the figure of a man-lion, and only one phrase that simply does not rule out the possibility of a violent side to the benign Viṣṇu.

 

Soifer speaks of the enigma of Viṣṇu's Narasiṁha avatāra and comments that how the myth arrived at its rudimentary form [first recorded in the Mahābhārata], and where the figure of the man-lion came from remain unsolved mysteries.

 

An image of Narasiṁha, dating to the 9th century, was found on the northern slope of Mount Ijo, at Prambanan, Indonesia. Images of Trivikrama and Varāha avatāras were also found at Prambanan, Indonesia. Viṣṇu and His avatāra images follow iconographic peculiarities characteristic of the art of central Java. This includes physiognomy of central Java, an exaggerated volume of garment, and some elaboration of the jewelry. This decorative scheme once formulated became, with very little modification, an accepted norm for sculptures throughout the Central Javanese period (circa 730–930 A.D.). Despite the iconographic peculiarities, the stylistic antecedents of the Java sculptures can be traced back to Indian carvings as the Chalukya and Pallava images of the 6th–7th centuries AD.

 

CULTURAL TRADITION OF PROCESSION (SRI NRSIMHA YATRA)

In Rājopadhyāya Brahmins of Nepal, there is a tradition of celebrating the procession ceremony of the deity Narasiṁha avatar, in Lalitpur district of the Kathmandu Valley in Nepal. The Lunar fifth day of the waning phase of the moon, in the holy Soli-lunar Śrāvaṇa month i.e. on Śrāvaṇa Kṛṣṇa Pañcamī of the Hindu Lunar Calendar is marked as auspicious day for the religious procession, Nṛsiṁha Yātrā. This tradition of the holy procession has been held for more than a hundred years. This is one of the typical traditions of the Rājopadhyāya Bramhins, the Hindu Bramhans of the locality.

 

In this Nṛsiṁha Yātrā, each year one male member of the Rājopadhyāya community gets the chance to be the organizer each year in that particular day. He gets his turn according to the sequence in their record, where the names of Rājopadhyāya bramhins are registered when a brahmāṇa lad is eligible to be called as a Bramhan.

 

WIKIPEDIA

(Original shot take with Canon Eos 5, on Ilford 400 Delta Professional)

View On Black

...and you find yourself longing for a certain drastic context

a dreadful circumstance that will tack great lengths onto your dictionary definition

 

to soothe your leaden understanding of bread, water, and money

now arriving by an alternate route at where the absence of such things might leave you

mind you, this is not more rich confession of a child actor

and as you would agree completely with a gift cyst as it appeared in your throat

and delight your tiny heart a moment with uncontested omnipresence will...

 

you've had the wind knocked out of you by something life size and you're afraid to say to your face

you stretch the pen and cheat the sleep

 

this sort of evening you want to say something you words cannot

 

note: which leaves your ghost blowing up globes

tying them off with an x axis c-clamp

and setting them down

 

for 7 days and 7 nights

you've sewn a cloth copy of your nervous system

to a turtle neck and pair tux pants

outside the city's dry all covered in primer

you have lost control of you hair

yesterday you were shot for a magazine cover

fatigue swapped your body build with all urge and by the door

you heard demo's creaking squeezing a squeal from your guilt against the clinging teeth of their cd-tray

all beneath the inner half of the door knob

hissing at its other head

hung in the sun

 

you're staring at a quill as the lump sum of its parts

and it's begun to look brutal

 

4 walls of day: and that alone

no empty hallway for you bearing the 100 bright light blocking doors of luck

and here in the favor of life i will

contrive no device against expectation, only announce

i have learned to respect the color yellow

for one reason or another

and in the insurmountable non strength of one's weight

 

and you're afraid to say to your face

you stretch the pen and cheat the sleep

since you all alone

has always been such the long audience

you spring forth, full with overconfidence

as if to say...superman

(Ghostwork - 13 & God)

Scenery captured on April 1st., 2012 @ 19:44:21 hrs.

from my bedroom in my Belgian Residence.

The sheer density of the towers makes The Bayon almost claustrophobic.

 

Former Conservator of Angkor Maurice Glaize says "the Bayon is not so much an architectural work as the translation to reality of the spiritual beliefs of a grand mystic - the Buddhist king Jayavarman VII - with the four faces of each tower looking to the four cardinal points signifying the omnipresence of the bodhisattva Lokesvara, the kingdom’s principal divinity." He recommends the moonlight view.

カンボヂアのアンコル　ワトのバヨン。

 

A few of the smiling faces watching over Bayon temple, Angkor Thom, Cambodia.

 

A translation of King Jayavarman VII`s mystic Buddhist beliefs, Bayon is a spiritual experience. From each of the survivng towers the enlightened grin of the Boddhisattva Avalokitesvara, one of the most worshipped divinities in Mahayana Buddhism and the kingdom's principal divinity, compassion radiates out in the four cardinal directions. Carved in the likeness of the King himself (his portrait is known from other sculptures found elsewhere in Cambodia and Thailand), these enigmatically smiling faces portray the King as god, symbolizing his omnipresence and omnipotence.

Scenery captured on April 20, 2012 @ 18:18:56 hrs.

De toutes les églises de Rome, une seule est considérée comme étant la « mère et tête de toutes les églises » : la basilique Saint-Jean de Latran, cathédrale de Rome, siège du diocèse de la Ville.

 

Cette église fondamentale du Catholicisme est propriété du Saint-Siège et fait donc partie du Vatican (même si elle ne se trouve pas sur le territoire du Vatican). C’est une des quatre basiliques majeures de Rome, et ne l’est pas que par la taille : 12 conciles y eurent lieu, dont 5 œcuméniques tout au long du Moyen-âge et de la Renaissance (1123, 1139, 1179, 1215 et de 1512 à 1516). C’est aussi au Latran que Charlemagne se fit baptiser, à Pâques en 774, ou que les fameux accords entre l’Eglise et l’Etat furent signés en 1929, les accords du Latran.

L’Archibasilique du Très Saint-Sauveur, plus connue sous le nom de Basilique de Saint-Jean de Latran, est l’église la plus ancienne de la ville, construite avant même Saint Pierre de Rome. L’empereur Constantin Ier (306-337) l’a fit construire, selon la légende, après avoir guéri d’une maladie en 313, et sera consacrée en 324 par le pape Sylvestre Ier. C’est l’église utilisée par le pape, lorsqu’il assume le rôle d’évêque de la Ville Éternelle. Elle est bâtie sur les anciens terrains d’une ancienne famille patricienne, les Laterani, qui donnèrent ainsi leur nom à l’église, Latran. Sainte Hélène, la mère de Constantin, chrétienne très fervente, avait fait cadeau des terrains au pape de l’époque, Melchiade.

Avant le renouveau de Saint-Pierre de Rome, à la Renaissance, le siège de la Chrétienté était au Latran. Pendant 1000 ans, du IVe au XIVe siècle, le pape y avait sa résidence, son siège, jusqu’à l’« exil » de Clément V à Avignon, en 1309. L’ancienne résidence papale est encore visible, le Palais de Latran, que l’on peut voir collé à la basilique, reconverti en musée par le pape Grégoire XVI. L’église avec tant de reconstructions, eu forcément des besoins financiers importants. Les rois de France contribuèrent au financement, depuis Louis XI au XVe siècle, de façon plus ou moins régulière suivant les aléas de l’Histoire, jusqu’en 1871. Henri IV, en échange de l’assurance des revenus provenant de l’Abbaye de Clairac pour le Latran, fut remercié avec une statue que l’on peut encore voir de nos jours, et le dirigeant français fut fait chanoine d’honneur. Aujourd’hui, le Président de la République, quel qu’il soit est ainsi systématiquement fait chanoine d’honneur de la basilique Saint-Jean de Latran.

L’église que nous pouvons admirer aujourd’hui date du XVIIe siècle, sous le pontificat d’Urbain V, et est la deuxième plus grande église de Rome, avec ses 130m de long. La façade blanche réalisée entre 1732 et 1735, toute en travertin, fut conçue par le Florentin Alessandro Galilei, avec les statues monumentales en son sommet. Ces statues de 7m de haut représentent Jésus, Saint Jean et Saint Jean-Baptiste, ainsi que les docteurs de l’église. La gigantesque porte de bronze est une porte antique, qui n’est autre que celle de l’ancienne Curie romaine ! Sur le fronton, nous pouvons y lire « omnium urbis et orbis ecclesiarum mater et caput », mère et tête de toutes les églises de la ville et du monde.

 

La structure intérieure de la basilique est l’œuvre de Francesco Borromini, exécutée en style baroque. Les travaux débutèrent lors de l’année sainte, le Jubilé de 1650, commandés par le pape Innocent X. Des 14 arcades originelles, il passa à 5, retravaillant ainsi totalement l’espace intérieur de la basilique, qui retrouva l’esprit de l’édifice antique, avec ses 5 nefs. Dans chaque niche de la nef, longue de 130m, nous pouvons voir les statues des apôtres qui regardent les fidèles venus à l’église. Ces statues furent sculptées entre 1703 et 1719. Les chapelles latérales sont également issues du génie de Borromini. Le jeu de lumières que Borromini a su créer est bluffant, avec la lumière qui rentre par les fenêtres, tels des puits de lumière. Cette lumière si spéciale renforce le coté sacré de cet endroit. Borromini conservera le sol, venu du Moyen-âge, et le plafond, en caissons peints et moulures dorées, du bois sculpté du XVIe siècle.

Le sol de la basilique mérite toute l’attention du monde. C’est un sol que l’on nomme de « cosmatesque ». Ce type de sol, fait d’innombrables morceaux de marbre, était typique de l’Italie du Moyen-âge, friande de ce type de mosaïque. Le nom vient de Laurent Cosma et de sa famille, les Cosmati, des artisans qui créèrent bon nombre de ces œuvres, en prélevant le marbre des ruines romaines antiques. Ces sols sont absolument splendides, m’impressionnant beaucoup plus que toutes les statues de l’église : on n’a pas l’habitude de marcher sur quelque chose de si beau, et son omniprésence donne cet aspect chaleureux à Saint Jean de Latran, bien différent des sols en pierre des cathédrales gothiques.

 

Of all the churches in Rome, only one is considered the "mother and head of all churches": the Basilica of St. John Lateran, cathedral of Rome, seat of the diocese of the City.

 

This fundamental church of Catholicism is property of the Holy See and therefore part of the Vatican (even if it is not located on Vatican territory). It is one of the four major basilicas of Rome, and it is not only because of the size: 12 councils took place, including 5 ecumenical throughout the Middle Ages and the Renaissance (1123, 1139, 1179, 1215 and from 1512 to 1516). It is also in the Lateran that Charlemagne was baptized, at Easter in 774, or that the famous agreements between the Church and the State were signed in 1929, the Lateran agreements.

The Archibasilica of the Most Holy Savior, better known as the Basilica of St. John Lateran, is the oldest church in the city, built even before St. Peter of Rome. Emperor Constantine I (306-337) had it built, according to legend, after curing a disease in 313, and will be consecrated in 324 by Pope Sylvester I. This is the church used by the pope when he assumes the role of bishop of the Eternal City. It is built on the old grounds of an old patrician family, the Laterani, which gave their name to the church, Lateran. St. Helena, the mother of Constantine, a very fervent Christian, had given the land to the pope of the time, Melchiade.

Before the revival of St. Peter's in Rome, during the Renaissance, the siege of Christendom was at the Lateran. For 1000 years, from the fourth to the fourteenth century, the pope had his residence, his seat, until the "exile" of Clement V in Avignon, in 1309. The former papal residence is still visible, the Lateran Palace , which can be seen stuck to the basilica, converted into a museum by Pope Gregory XVI. The church with so many reconstructions, had necessarily important financial needs. The kings of France contributed to the financing, since Louis XI in the 15th century, in a more or less regular way according to the vagaries of the History, until 1871. Henry IV, in exchange for the insurance of the revenues coming from the Abbey from Clairac to the Lateran, was thanked with a statue that can still be seen today, and the French leader was made canon of honor. Today, the President of the Republic, whoever he is is thus systematically made canon of honor of the basilica Saint-Jean of Lateran.

The church that we can admire today dates from the seventeenth century, under the pontificate of Urban V, and is the second largest church in Rome, with its 130m long. The white facade built between 1732 and 1735, all travertine, was designed by the Florentine Alessandro Galilei, with the monumental statues at the top. These statues 7m high represent Jesus, Saint John and Saint John the Baptist, as well as the doctors of the church. The gigantic bronze door is an ancient door, which is none other than that of the ancient Roman Curia! On the pediment, we can read "omnium urbis and orbis ecclesiarum mater and caput", mother and head of all the churches of the city and the world.

The inner structure of the basilica is the work of Francesco Borromini, executed in Baroque style. Work began during the holy year, the Jubilee of 1650, commissioned by Pope Innocent X. Of the 14 original arcades, he went to 5, thus completely reworking the interior space of the basilica, which found the spirit of the ancient building, with its 5 naves. In each niche of the nave, 130m long, we can see the statues of the apostles who watch the faithful coming to the church. These statues were carved between 1703 and 1719. The side chapels are also from the genius of Borromini. The play of lights that Borromini has created is stunning, with the light coming in through the windows, like skylights. This special light reinforces the sacred side of this place. Borromini will preserve the soil, from the Middle Ages, and the ceiling, in painted boxes and gilded moldings, carved wood of the sixteenth century.

The basilica floor deserves all the attention of the world. It is a soil that we call "cosmatesque". This type of floor, made of innumerable pieces of marble, was typical of medieval Italy, fond of this type of mosaic. The name comes from Laurent Cosma and his family, the Cosmati, craftsmen who created many of these works, taking marble from the ancient Roman ruins. These soils are absolutely splendid, impressing me much more than all the statues of the church: we are not used to walking on something so beautiful, and its omnipresence gives this warm aspect to Saint Jean de Latran, very different from the stone floors of Gothic cathedrals.

Just a small Kong tennis ball!

The Rookery was built in 1887–1888 by the architectural partnership of Daniel H. Burnham and John Wellborn Root, known as Burnham and Root. In the architectural boom that followed the Great Chicago Fire, architects in what would become known as the Chicago School of commercial architecture competed with each other to create the world's first true skyscrapers. By mixing modern building techniques, such as metal framing, fireproofing, elevators and plate glass, together with traditional ones, such as brick facades and elaborate ornamentation, Burnham and Root sought to create a bold architectural statement. At the same time, they intended their buildings to be commercially successful. This building is one of the few results of their partnership that is still standing.

Beginning in the early 20th century, the building underwent three major renovations. In the first, from 1905 to 1907, Frank Lloyd Wright was retained to remake the interior spaces. In keeping with contemporary tastes, Wright's design covered Root's elaborate wrought iron finishes with white carved Carrara marble surfaces. Nearing the peak of his fame, Wright's changes brought enhanced status to the building, making the Rookery one of the most sought after buildings in all of Chicago. Some of Wright's other changes included incorporating simplified ironwork and adding planters as well as light fixtures.

Built:

1886

Architect:

Burnham & Root; Frank Lloyd Wright; William Drummond; et al.

Architectural style:

Chicago

Governing body:

Private

NRHP Reference#:

70000238

U.S. National Register of Historic Places

U.S. National Historic Landmark

Chicago Landmark

Isaac Israels. 1864-1934. La Haye.

Scottish Dance. Danse écossaise.

Dordrecht Museum

 

L'ESQUISSE ou L'ART DU FLOU

 

L'Art Moderne, annoncé bien avant le début du 20è siècle par les pré-impressionnistes, les impressionnistes et les post-impressionnistes, a été un facteur tout à fait remarquable de renouvellement des formes, dans la peinture européenne.

L'Art a toujours été, une manière de rêver le monde réel. Mais les nouvelles techniques de l'Art Moderne, s'éloignent toutes, de manière très intentionnelle, volontariste, de la représentation exacte du réel.

Les peintres tendent à créer un art dans lequel l'interprétation du réel l'emporte sur sa reproduction.

L'artiste moderne ne reproduit plus guère le réel, il le rêve, ou l'invente. Ces tendances ont abouti à l'art non figuratif, autrement appelé l'art abstrait.

Ce renouvellement des formes en peinture a apporté de nouvelles possibilités, très intéressantes, et très belles, d'expression artistique.

Parmi les techniques développées au cours du 19è siècle l'Esquisse a été une des meilleures expressions de l'Art du Flou.

L'Art du Flou a été pratiqué de manière géniale par Léonard de Vinci. Le "Sfumato" est, dans le cadre d'une peinture très figurative et parfaitement finie, comme la Joconde, les Vierges au rocher, ou Saint Jean Baptiste, une ébauche d'art du flou.

L'Esquisse a été dans l'histoire de la peinture un projet, une étude préparatoire, qui permettait à l'artiste de s'assurer de la cohérence et de l'équilibre de son tableau fini. Dans ce cas, le plus souvent, le flou n'est qu'une approximation, un brouillon, le témoin d'un art incomplet qui demande à être achevé.

Mais de nombreux artistes, au cours des siècles passés, ont parfaitement compris que l'esquisse pouvait, parfois, exceptionnellement, être une oeuvre achevée.

C'est à dire une oeuvre dont une grande majorité de spectateurs, experts ou non, ressentaient impérieusement que RIEN ne devait lui être ajoutée. Ce n'est pas une définition mathématique, mais c'est la meilleure.

L'esquisse n'est une oeuvre achevée que lorsqu'elle est créatrice d'une atmosphère singulière, particulièrement suggestive, porteuse d'une poésie qui lui est propre, unique. Quand il apparaît de manière évidente que plus de précision dans le dessin fermerait les portes à l'imaginaire, au mystère, et détruirait un équilibre subtile entre le rêve et la réalité.

Le dessin trop précis peut en effet fermer les portes à l'imaginaire, alors que le flou qui caractérise l'esquisse peut les ouvrir. Les photographes le savent bien aussi : Le flou peut être simplement flou, mais il peut aussi être une invitation à ressentir un mystère et à participer à une énigme. Le spectateur est invité à meubler par son imagination le flou qui lui est proposé.

Mais c'est une alchimie dont seuls les grands artistes, peuvent, exceptionnellement, pénétrer le secret.

Le grand maître de cette technique, et celui qui, le plus précocement, l'a poussé le plus loin, a été sans doute William Turner (1775-1851).

Delacroix a été aussi, un peu après Turner, un des grands précurseurs de l'art de l'esquisse. Par exemple dans la "mort de Sadarnapale" mais aussi dans bien d'autres tableaux. Mais Delacroix est aussi un exemple des limites de cette technique. Toutes les techniques rencontrent, à un moment ou à un autre, leurs limites.

L'Art de l'esquisse est redoutablement difficile, car il ne suffit pas de dessiner schématiquement un sujet pour faire une belle oeuvre. De même qu'en photographie de nos jours, il ne suffit pas de dessiner et de peindre flou pour créer une oeuvre d'art.

Le flou peut n'être qu'une esquisse ou une approximation, dont finalement la valeur marchande ne tient qu'à la signature d'un grand nom.

Il est vrai que l'esquisse peut dégager une certaine puissance expressive, avoir une puissance évocatrice, une poésie de l'inachevé. Une force expressive que le tableau, bien fini, bien dessiné et bien peint, achevé, peut effectivement perdre. Mais la magie poétique de l'art du flou ne peut pas être systématique.

Le flou, c'est aussi beaucoup une question de mode. Une habitude du regard. Une culture.

L'esthétique de notre époque est un peu trop focalisée sur l'esquisse.

On finit par ne plus voir que des esquisses dans les galeries de peintures modernes ou contemporaines.

En réalité les artistes ne sont pas les seuls responsables de cette situation. Au 19è siècle la société occidentale est entrée dans une culture qui fait de la réussite, matérielle, économique, et de l'Argent ses valeurs principales. Dès lors des esquisses, qui ne seraient pas sorties des brouillons personnels de l'artiste, pendant les siècles précédents, sont devenues de marchandises sources de profits. Ces marchandises, se trouvent même dans les musées. Picasso avait très bien compris ce mécanisme économique.

Bien sûr cette évolution est habillée de Grands Principes : Il n'est pas question d'Argent, mais de l'Artiste, de la Liberté de Création, du Progrès des Arts, d'une "sensibilité nouvelle", de "vivre avec son temps" etc...

Cette omniprésence de l'esquisse reflète non seulement des habitudes du regard mais des valeurs éthiques. L'Art du Flou est devenu aussi l'Art de faire, vite, de l'Argent.

Valeurs morales positives ou négatives. Nous vivons dans un monde un peu trop pressé !! Pour aller où ?

  

THE SKETCH OR THE ART OF BLUR

  

Modern Art, announced well before the beginning of the 20th century by the pré-impressionnists, impressionists and post-impressionists, was a factor quite remarkable renewal forms in European painting.

Art has always been a way to dream the real world. But the new techniques of modern art, are moving away all so very intentional, deliberate, of the exact representation of reality.

The painters tend to create an art in which the interpretation of reality trumps its reproduction.

The modern artist is hardly reproduces reality, it's dream or invent. These trends have resulted in non-figurative art, also called abstract art.

This renewal forms in painting is total. He brought new possibilities of artistic expression.

Among the techniques developed during the 19th century, the sketch was one of the best expressions of the Art of Blur.

The Art of Blur has been practiced ingeniously by Leonardo da Vinci. The "Sfumato" is in the context of a very figurative and perfectly finished painting, like the Mona Lisa, the Virgin on the rock, or John the Baptist, a draft of art of blur..

The sketch was in the history of painting, a project, a preparatory study, which allowed the artist to ensure the coherence and balance of the finished table. In this case, usually, the blur is only an approximation, a preform, a draft, witnessed an incomplete art which needs to be completed.

But many artists, over the centuries, have understood perfectly that the sketch was sometimes, exceptionally, be a finished work.

That is to say a work, of which a large majority of spectators, experts or not, imperiously felt that NOTHING was to be added to it. This is not a mathematical definition, but this is the best.

The sketch is a finished work, only when it is creative, from a singular atmosphere, particularly suggestive, carrying a single poetry. When he appears, with evidence, that more precision in drawing, closes the doors to the imagination, of the mystery, and destroy a subtle balance between dream and reality.

The tto precise drawing can, in fact, close the doors to the imagination. While the blur, characteristic of the sketch, can open these doors. The photographers also know well: The blur can be simply fuzzy, but it can also be an invitation to feel a mystery and to participate in an enigma. The viewer is invited to furnish the blur proposed to him, through his imagination.

But it is an alchemy that only great artists have exceptionally found the secret.

The great master of this technique that the earliest, pushed him, foremost, was William Turner (1775-1851).

Delacroix was also a little after Turner, one of the major precursors of the art of the sketch. For example in the "death of Sadarnapale" but also in many other paintings. But Delacroix is also an example of the limitations of this technique. All techniques meet, at one time or another, their limits.

The Art of the sketch is terribly difficult, because it is not enough to draw schematically a subject to make a beautiful work. It is not enough to draw and paint blur, or photographing blur, to create a work of art.

The blur can be only a sketch or an approximation, which ultimately market value is up to the signing of a big name.

It is true that the sketch can release a certain expressive power, have an evocative power, a poetry of unfinished. An expressive force that the painting, well finished, well designed and well painted, completed, can actually lose. But the poetic magic of Blur Art cannot be systematic.

It is also very much a question of fashion. A habit of look. A culture.

The aesthetics of our time is a little too focused on the sketch.

We finally see only sketches in the galleries of modern and contemporary paintings.

In fact the artists are not the solely responsibles, for this situation. In the 19th century Western society has entered a culture that makes of the success, physical, material, economic, and of money, its main values. Therefore the sketches, which would not come out of personal drafts of the artist, in previous centuries, have become merchandises, and sources of profits. These goods are found even in museums. Picasso understood very well, what economic mechanism.

Of course this evolution is dressed in Great Principles: There is no question of Money, but of the Artist, of the Freedom of Creation,of the Progress of the Arts, of a "new sensibility", "to live with her time "etc ...

This omnipresence of the sketch reflects not only the look but the habits of ethical values.

positive or negative moral values. The Art of the blur has also become the Art to do, quickly, of the money.

We live in a world too pressed !! To go where ?

   

The Garuda is a large bird-like creature, or humanoid bird that appears in both Hinduism and Buddhism. Garuda is the mount (vahana) of the Lord Vishnu. Garuda is the Hindu name for the constellation Aquila. The brahminy kite and phoenix are considered to be the contemporary representations of Garuda. Indonesia adopts a more stylistic approach to the Garuda's depiction as its national symbol, where it depicts a Javanese eagle (being much larger than a kite).

 

ABOUT GARUDA

In Hinduism, Garuda is a Hindu divinity, usually the mount (vahana) of the Lord Vishnu. Garuda is depicted as having the golden body of a strong man with a white face, red wings, and an eagle's beak and with a crown on his head. This ancient deity was said to be massive, large enough to block out the sun.

 

Garuda is known as the eternal sworn enemy of the Nāga serpent race and known for feeding exclusively on snakes, such behavior may have referred to the actual short-toed eagle of India. The image of Garuda is often used as the charm or amulet to protect the bearer from snake attack and its poison, since the king of birds is an implacable enemy and "devourer of serpent". Garudi Vidya is the mantra against snake poison to remove all kinds of evil.

 

His stature in Hindu religion can be gauged by the fact that a dependent Upanishad, the Garudopanishad, and a Purana, the Garuda Purana, is devoted to him. Various names have been attributed to Garuda - Chirada, Gaganeshvara, Kamayusha, Kashyapi, Khageshvara, Nagantaka, Sitanana, Sudhahara, Suparna, Tarkshya, Vainateya, Vishnuratha and others. The Vedas provide the earliest reference of Garuda, though by the name of Śyena, where this mighty bird is said to have brought nectar to earth from heaven. The Puranas, which came into existence much later, mention Garuda as doing the same thing, which indicates that Śyena (Sanskrit for eagle) and Garuda are the same. One of the faces of Śrī Pañcamukha Hanuman is Mahavira Garuda. This face points towards the west. Worship of Garuda is believed to remove the effects of poisons from one's body. In Tamil Vaishnavism Garuda and Hanuman are known as "Periya Thiruvadi" and "Siriya Thiruvadi" respectively.

 

In the Bhagavad-Gita (Ch.10, Verse 30), in the middle of the battlefield "Kurukshetra", Krishna explaining his omnipresence, says - " as son of Vinata, I am in the form of Garuda, the king of the bird community (Garuda)" indicating the importance of Garuda.

 

Garuda wears the serpent Adisesha on his left small toenail and the serpent Gulika on his right cerebral cortex. The serpent Vasuki forms his sacred thread. The cobra Takshaka forms his belt on his hip. The snake Karkotaka is worn as his necklace. The snakes Padma and Mahapadma are his ear rings. The snake Shankachuda adorns his divine hair. He is flanked by his two wives ‘Rudra’ and ‘Sukeerthi’ or (Sukirthi). These are all invoked in Vedanta Desika's Garuda Panchashath and Garuda Dandaka compositions. Garuda flanked with his consorts 'Rudra' and 'Sukirthi' can be seen worshipped in an ancient Soumya Keshava temple in Bindiganavile (or Mayura puri in Sanskrit ) in Karnataka state of India.

 

Garuda Vyuha is worshiped in Tantra for Abhichara and to protect against Abhichara. However, the interesting thing is that Garuda is the Sankarshna form of the lord who during creation primarily possesses the knowledge aspect of the lord (among Vasudeva, Sankarshana, Pradyumna and Aniruddha forms). The important point is that Garuda represents the five vayus within us : prana, apana, vyana, udana, samana through his five forms Satya, Suparna, Garuda, Tarkshya, Vihageshwara. These five vayus through yoga can be controlled through Pranayama which can lead to Kundalini awakening leading to higher levels of consciousness.

 

Garuda plays an important role in Krishna Avatar in which Krishna and Satyabhama ride on Garuda to kill Narakasura. On another occasion, Lord Hari rides on Garuda to save the devotee elephant Gajendra. It is also said that Garuda's wings when flying will chant the Vedas.

 

With the position of Garuda's hands and palms, he is also called 'Kai Yendhi Perumal', in Tamil.

 

IN THE MAHABHARATA

BIRTH AND DEEDS

The story of Garuda's birth and deeds is told in the first book of the great epic Mahabharata.[4] According to the epic, when Garuda first burst forth from his egg, he appeared as a raging inferno equal to the cosmic conflagration that consumes the world at the end of every age. Frightened, the gods begged him for mercy. Garuda, hearing their plea, reduced himself in size and energy.

 

Garuda's father was the creator-rishi Kasyapa. He had two wives, Vinata and Kadru, who were daughters of Prajapathi Daksha. Kasyapa, on the pleadings of his wives, granted them their wishes; Vinata wished for two sons and Kadru wished for thousand snakes as her sons. Both laid eggs, while the thousand eggs of Kadru hatched early (after steaming the eggs to hatch) into snakes, the hatching of two eggs of Vinata did not take place for a long time. Impatient, Vinata broke open one egg, which was half formed with the upper half only as a human and was thus deformed. Her half formed son cursed her that she would be slave for her sister (she was her rival) for a long time by which time her second son would be born who would save her from his curse; her first son who flew away and came to prominence as Aruna, the red spectacle seen as the Sun rises in the morning, and as also charioteer of the Sun. The second egg hatched after a long time during which period Vinata was the servant of her sister as she had lost a bet with her. When the second egg hatched, a fully grown, shining and of mighty sized bird form emerged as Garuda, the king of birds. Garuda was thus born.

 

One day, Vinata entered into and lost a foolish bet, as a result of which she became enslaved to her sister. Resolving to release his mother from this state of bondage, Garuda approached the serpents and asked them what it would take to purchase her freedom. Their reply was that Garuda would have to bring them the elixir of immortality, also called amrita. It was a tall order. The amrita at that time found itself in the possession of the gods, who guarded it zealously, since it was the source of their immortality. They had ringed the elixir with a massive fire that covered the sky. They had blocked the way to the elixir with a fierce mechanical contraption of sharp rotating blades. And finally, they had stationed two gigantic poisonous snakes next to the elixir as deadly guardians.

 

Undaunted, Garuda hastened toward the abode of the gods intent on robbing them of their treasure. Knowing of his design, the gods met him in full battle-array. Garuda, however, defeated the entire host and scattered them in all directions. Taking the water of many rivers into his mouth, he extinguished the protective fire the gods had thrown up. Reducing his size, he crept past the rotating blades of their murderous machine. And finally, he mangled the two gigantic serpents they had posted as guards. Taking the elixir into his mouth without swallowing it, he launched again into the air and headed toward the eagerly waiting serpents. En route, he encountered Vishnu. Rather than fight, the two exchanged promises. Vishnu promised Garuda the gift of immortality even without drinking from the elixir, and Garuda promised to become Vishnu's mount. Flying onward, he met Indra the god of the sky. Another exchange of promises occurred. Garuda promised that once he had delivered the elixir, thus fulfilling the request of the serpents, he would make it possible for Indra to regain possession of the elixir and to take it back to the gods. Indra in turn promised Garuda the serpents as food.At long last, Garuda alighted in front of the waiting serpents. Placing the elixir on the grass, and thereby liberating his mother Vinata from her servitude, he urged the serpents to perform their religious ablutions before consuming it. As they hurried off to do so, Indra swooped in to make off with the elixir. The serpents came back from their ablutions and saw the elixir gone but with small droplets of it on the grass. They tried to lick the droplets and thereby split their tongues in two. From then onwards, serpents have split tongues and shed their skin as a kind of immortality. From that day onward, Garuda was the ally of the gods and the trusty mount of Vishnu, as well as the implacable enemy of snakes, upon whom he preyed at every opportunity.

 

DESCENDANTS

According to the Mahabharata, Garuda had six sons (Sumukha, Suvarna, Subala, Sunaama, Sunethra and Suvarchas) from whom were descended the race of birds. The members of this race were of great might and without compassion, subsisting as they did on their relatives the snakes. Vishnu was their protector.

 

AS A SYMBOL

Throughout the Mahabharata, Garuda is invoked as a symbol of impetuous violent force, of speed, and of martial prowess. Powerful warriors advancing rapidly on doomed foes are likened to Garuda swooping down on a serpent. Defeated warriors are like snakes beaten down by Garuda. The field marshal Drona uses a military formation named after Garuda. Krishna even carries the image of Garuda on his banner.

 

IN BUDDHISM

In Buddhist mythology, the Garuda (Pāli: garuḷā) are enormous predatory birds with intelligence and social organization. Another name for the Garuda is suparṇa (Pāli: supaṇṇa), meaning "well-winged, having good wings". Like the Naga, they combine the characteristics of animals and divine beings, and may be considered to be among the lowest devas.

 

The exact size of the Garuda is uncertain, but its wings are said to have a span of many miles. This may be a poetic exaggeration, but it is also said that when a Garuda's wings flap, they create hurricane-like winds that darken the sky and blow down houses. A human being is so small compared to a Garuda that a man can hide in the plumage of one without being noticed (Kākātī Jātaka, J.327). They are also capable of tearing up entire banyan trees from their roots and carrying them off.

 

Garudas are the great golden-winged Peng birds. They also have the ability to grow large or small, and to appear and disappear at will. Their wingspan is 330 yojanas (one yojana being 8 miles long). With one flap of its wings, a Peng bird dries up the waters of the sea so that it can gobble up all the exposed dragons. With another flap of its wings, it can level the mountains by moving them into the ocean.

 

There were also the four garuda-kings: Great-Power-Virtue Garuda-King, Great-Body Garuda-King, Great-Fulfillment Garuda-King, and Free-At-Will Garuda-King, each accompanied by hundreds of thousands of attendants.

 

The Garudas have kings and cities, and at least some of them have the magical power of changing into human form when they wish to have dealings with people. On some occasions Garuda kings have had romances with human women in this form. Their dwellings are in groves of the simbalī, or silk-cotton tree.

 

The Garuda are enemies to the nāga, a race of intelligent serpent- or dragon-like beings, whom they hunt. The Garudas at one time caught the nāgas by seizing them by their heads; but the nāgas learned that by swallowing large stones, they could make themselves too heavy to be carried by the Garudas, wearing them out and killing them from exhaustion. This secret was divulged to one of the Garudas by the ascetic Karambiya, who taught him how to seize a nāga by the tail and force him to vomit up his stone (Pandara Jātaka, J.518).

 

The Garudas were among the beings appointed by Śakra to guard Mount Sumeru and the Trāyastriṃśa heaven from the attacks of the asuras.

 

In the Maha-samaya Sutta (Digha Nikaya 20), the Buddha is shown making temporary peace between the Nagas and the Garudas.

 

The Thai rendering of Garuda (ครุฑ Krut) as Vishnu vehicle and Garuda's quest for elixir was based on Indian legend of Garuda. It was told that Garuda overcame many heavenly beings in order to gain the ambrosia (amrita) elixir. No one was able to get the better of him, not even Narai (Vishnu). At last, a truce was called and an agreement was made to settle the rancor and smooth all the ruffled feathers. It was agreed that when Narai is in his heavenly palace, Garuda will be positioned in a superior status, atop the pillar above Narai's residence. However, whenever Narai wants to travel anywhere, Garuda must serve as his transport.

 

The Sanskrit word Garuda has been borrowed and modified in the languages of several countries. In Burmese, Garudas are called galone (ဂဠုန်). In Burmese astrology, the vehicle of the Sunday planet is the galone. In the Kapampangan language of the Philippines, the native word for eagle is galura. In Japanese a Garuda is called karura (however, the form Garuda ガルーダ is used in recent Japanese fiction - see below).

 

For the Mongols, the Garuda is called Khan Garuda or Khangarid (Mongolian: Хангарьд). Before and after each round of Mongolian wrestling, wrestlers perform the Garuda ritual, a stylised imitation of the Khangarid and a hawk.

 

In the Qing Dynasty fiction The Story of Yue Fei (1684), Garuda sits at the head of the Buddha's throne. But when a celestial bat (an embodiment of the Aquarius constellation) flatulates during the Buddha’s expounding of the Lotus Sutra, Garuda kills her and is exiled from paradise. He is later reborn as Song Dynasty General Yue Fei. The bat is reborn as Lady Wang, wife of the traitor Prime Minister Qin Hui, and is instrumental in formulating the "Eastern Window" plot that leads to Yue's eventual political execution. It is interesting to note The Story of Yue Fei plays on the legendary animosity between Garuda and the Nagas when the celestial bird-born Yue Fei defeats a magic serpent who transforms into the unearthly spear he uses throughout his military career. Literary critic C. T. Hsia explains the reason why Qian Cai, the book's author, linked Yue with Garuda is because of the homology in their Chinese names. Yue Fei's courtesy name is Pengju (鵬舉). A Peng (鵬) is a giant mythological bird likened to the Middle Eastern Roc. Garuda's Chinese name is Great Peng, the Golden-Winged Illumination King (大鵬金翅明王).

 

As a cultural and national symbol

In India, Indonesia and the rest of Southeast Asia the eagle symbolism is represented by Garuda, a large mythical bird with eagle-like features that appears in both Hindu and Buddhist mythology as the vahana (vehicle) of the god Vishnu. Garuda became the national emblem of Thailand and Indonesia; Thailand's Garuda is rendered in a more traditional anthropomorphic mythical style, while that of Indonesia is rendered in heraldic style with traits similar to the real Javan hawk-eagle.

 

INDIA

India primarily uses Garuda as a martial motif:

 

Garud Commando Force is a Special Forces unit of the Indian Air Force, specializing in operations deep behind enemy lines

Brigade of the Guards of the Indian Army uses Garuda as their symbol

Elite bodyguards of the medieval Hoysala kings were called Garudas

Kerala and Andhra pradesh state road transport corporations use Garuda as the name for a/c moffusil buses

Garuda rock, a rocky cliff in Tirumala in Andhra pradesh

13th century Aragalur chief, Magadesan's, insignia was Rishabha the sacred bull and the Garuda

 

INDONESIA

Indonesia uses the Garuda, called the Garuda Pancasila, as its national symbol, it is somewhat intertwined with the concept of the phoenix.

 

Garuda Pancasila is coloured or gilt gold, symbolizes the greatness of the nation and is a representation of the elang Jawa or Javan hawk-eagle Nisaetus bartelsi. The black color represents nature. There are 17 feathers on each wing, 8 on the lower tail, 19 on the upper tail and 45 on the neck, which represent the date Indonesia proclaimed its independence: 17 August 1945. The shield it carries with the Indonesian Panca Sila heraldry symbolizes self-defense and protection in struggle.

 

Indonesian national airline is Garuda Indonesia.

Indonesian Armed Forces United Nations peacekeeping missions is known as Pasukan Garuda or Garuda Contingent

Airlangga University, one of the oldest and leading university in Indonesia uses Garuda on its emblem. The emblem, containing a Garuda in a blue and yellow circle, is called "Garudamukha", and depicts Garuda as the bearer of knowledge, carrying a jug of Amrita, the water of eternity, symbolizing eternal knowledge.

 

In Bali and Java Garuda has become a cultural symbol, the wooden statue and mask of Garuda is a popular artworks and souvenirs.

In Bali, we can find the tallest Garuda statue of 18 metres tall made from tons of copper and brass. The statue is located in Garuda Wisnu Kencana complex.

Garuda has identified as Indonesian national football team in international games, namely "The Garuda Team".

The stylized brush stroke that resemble Garuda is appear in the logo of 2011 Southeast Asian Games, held in Palembang and Jakarta, Indonesia.

The stylized curves that took form of Garuda Pancasila is appear in the logo of Wonderful Indonesia tourism campaign.

 

THAILAND

Thailand uses the Garuda (Thai: ครุฑ, khrut) as its national symbol.

 

One form of the Garuda used in Thailand as a sign of the royal family is called Khrut Pha, meaning "Garuda, the vehicle (of Vishnu)."

The statue and images of Garuda adorned many Buddhist temples in Thailand, it also has become the cultural symbol of Thailand.

 

MONGOLIA

The Garuda, known as Khangarid, is the symbol of the capital city of Mongolia, Ulan Bator. According to popular Mongolian belief, Khangarid is the mountain spirit of the Bogd Khan Uul range who became a follower of Buddhist faith. Today he is considered the guardian of that mountain range and a symbol of courage and honesty.

The bird also gives its name to Hangard Aviation

Khangarid (Хангарьд), a football (soccer) team in the Mongolia Premier League also named after Garuda.

Garuda Ord (Гаруда Орд), a private construction and trading company based in Ulaanbaatar, also named after Garuda.

State Garuda (Улсын Гарьд) is a title given to the debut runner up in wrestling tournament during Mongolian National Festival Naadam.

 

SURINAME

In Suriname, there is a TV channel called Garuda. Suriname has a lot of people from Indonesia and Java, as it is a multicultural country.

 

WIKIPEDIA

Happy Valentine's Day!!!

 

www.youtube.com/watch?v=oR68oAtWY-c&feature=related

taken at the Geelong Botanic Gardens-20011

Scenery captured from the dining room of my residence in Antwerp / Belgium.

Scenery captured on October 15, 2011 @ 17:49:49 hours.

Architecte : Jacques Ferrier.

La singularité du bâtiment de Jacques Ferrier se fonde sur le lien que le nouveau siège communautaire crée avec le paysage de Rouen. Son profil contraste avec l’omniprésence des plans horizontaux qui caractérise ce site portuaire, et sa silhouette fait écho aux bâtiments industriels rénovés de la rive droite. Les obliques du volume répondent aux silhouettes des grues et des objets portuaires, aux étraves des navires qui passent. Le bâtiment révèle et se sert de la puissance du site pour intensifier la vie urbaine sur la rive gauche. En prolongement du futur parc, le bâtiment est à son tour créateur de contexte pour le futur écoquartier dont il sera la proue.

Son architecture facettée et transparente est conçue pour jouer des variations de lumière du ciel normand, des reflets de l’eau et des couleurs du climat. Le bâtiment est revêtu d’une façade d’écailles de verre colorées. Irisant et diffractant la lumière solaire, elles parent le bâtiment de touches de couleur qui se démultiplient avec les reflets du fleuve. Ce registre poétique est inspiré de l’impressionnisme et de Claude Monet. Le verre est revêtu d’une couche d’oxydes métalliques qui, de l’extérieur crée un reflet iridescent coloré, et s’efface vu de l’intérieur, n’altérant pas la vision des espaces de travail.

 

Architect: Jacques Ferrier.

The singularity of Jacques Ferrier’s building is based on the link that the new community headquarters creates with the landscape of Rouen. Its profile contrasts with the omnipresence of horizontal planes that characterize this port site, and its silhouette echoes the renovated industrial buildings on the right bank. The oblique lines of the volume respond to the silhouettes of cranes and port objects, and to the bows of passing ships. The building reveals and uses the power of the site to intensify urban life on the left bank. As an extension of the future park, the building is in turn a creator of context for the future eco-district of which it will be the prow.

Its faceted and transparent architecture is designed to play on the variations in light of the Normandy sky, the reflections of the water and the colors of the climate. The building is clad in a façade of colored glass scales. Iridescent and diffracting sunlight, they adorn the building with touches of color that multiply with the reflections of the river. This poetic register is inspired by impressionism and Claude Monet. The glass is coated with a layer of metallic oxides which, from the outside creates a colored iridescent reflection, and fades when seen from the inside, not altering the vision of the work spaces.