View allAll Photos Tagged notpayed
That was the first draft for the LED-backlight for her eyes.
More photos on IG:
#doku #smartdoll #dannychoo #smartdollcourage #cyberpunk #android #techtoys #tokyo #germany #anime #manga #diyled #ledsmd #smartdollloversgroup #smartdolllovers #dollsoninstagram #werbung #werbungdurchmarkierendermarke #ad but #notpayed
.
, .
·· · ·.
or'wr 'egular dhabn. :, which w,.as evidenUy aposition that.. ihwaaJNdlfferantfro~. th~ one taken In the1r pamphlet dated ~Ill Apn.l. On the ba~1s of .
u:o understanding arrived at the JNUSU Council meati e USU General Secretary along with the JNUSU Presidentd1scussed the ISStJe .
wtth the JNU Administration and then with are· ~ ~ n.9: .~ volta face AISA reverted back to .
their ol~ position of "rejecfln,toto~ ~osition in a p~~s~~~tive fro~ Ne~Ue on 6lh ApriiJHo...veve~,.in a~udde.
f ate~ 7 Apnl. The reason for chang1ng the1r poSition pedqled by AISA was that they .
were mtsled into .believing that the QUtlet was ~ 'e General Secretary of the JNUSU participate in the discussions with the run Ya ranCl~? ~d not Nestle. If that was truly so, why did th.
participated in the discussion along with the J~~~~representative In the JN~SUoffice (th~ Unit Secretary of AISA during that time had also .
op the ntgh~of 6th Apnl?.
After doin such afll -f1 office ~e.~~~). !SF on the Nesl!e iS&!e. in order to conceal th.a.
,ctt~sen ~qJau.r:lCfh,!i diatribe agains~ th~ Sf.l~A.
inconsistency in its ~wn ositit op, AISA has.
ns. We want to rem1nd the AISA tnat the Protest Demonstration they had called agatnst the Nestle on 8th Apnl'· .
. hi P · t · ·· ·.
th. .
ung m etr pamp etthat ·Now th t th d.
Sta: a e om1nan orgamsation in the JNUSU has chosen to act as an agent of Nestle rather than lead the .
Str I .1th b j+ 't· tel-.wf0f .aJ.I ~~nsitive· · students of JNU to come together to carry forward the struggle"; evoked such a.
ugg e agams e outlet.
poor re c.-f lh run Y "'1 ~.
frustrati~no~se ~0~ e ~'hJ~y'il'd~A~a~onIta 'struggle before ~tcould take off. Some AlBA leadershad also tak.on out their .
YP bhd~ m~sngftjl<Wjtfto.utrQO!qU\~JegaUons of taking finanCial favours from Nestle against the JNUSU PreSident. AISA .
lead b~hEW!our.~utirl the eyes of the·~~udentc~mmunity, AISA lost all credibility. Wawant.
..
to .:~~0 d~~:lde~e<!C'e~aorEU~\ll'Of~MPb.\'lfwtb1~o~ tho .luue If they thought they had taken a.
8.
W Y ey~~ld..n~c~IJY~.Q_yt-:~.;f.!gn~~r~ ~~mp~'P" for ~ UGBM. .
princtpled position? Were they afr~ld·tha~.tl)elf.cJa_ll4~Jlre ~lectoral aUle1a would notsupp.ort th elr position on Nestle? Why did not .
.
lmmediatec3ncellatlon ~~the Nestle contract, as was being demanded by .
the General Secretary ofJNUSU raise the d~.mandfpr~e. '.. ·.. :,.
AJSA, in ~e Campus Development Comml~e. Meeting hold on 30th August 2004? .
The SFl-AISF believes thatthere are aevera(~bjectionablo aspec;ts to'tho Nestle outlet, upeclaJJy the question of corporate .
.
control over public sp~coawithin the oampua. However,the SFI-AISF alto believes thatAJSA·typ' ..reject NeatJeln toton posturing 'e only exclusive corporate jointIn .
on the eve of the elections would nolhelp lr\,IOI~Ing the crucial inuea involved. Nestle Is notth.
the campus; there are also the latalodlc9m p~qu~~~~··WhatII urgently requiredI~ the framing of unlversaUy appUcable policy Moreover, WhUe remaining fully supportive towards tho long .
guidelines on such mattera by the.Campu Dey"lopm~rtt~ommlttoo: standing policy of JNU In giving priority to:~.laadvantaged Individuals.whl,le ,alloWng shops, SFI-AISF .Citls for transparent guidelines for such !lotmenlThe Review.o.f the ~ea:Je_contract with the Administration Ia due in January 2005. SF1-AISF believes .
that a debate involvlng all sections ofthe uo~~raJty community ls required before deciding upon the further continuation ofthe Nestle contraclln this regard SFI-AISF welcome ~estatement signed byseveral progresslve faculty members, whlch has been publicised by a studentgroup yesterday. However,we beOeve thatthoso faculty members abould actively me bili~e oplnlon within the teaching community, since several faculty members in th~Campua Development Committee had actively supported tho Nestio .
,· : · · · .
proposal and the JNUTAdid not.oppose il · ..- ,. . .. . In a pamphlet datad211.J!).,04 AJSA has ~ed to respond to ~meof our criticisms with its usuaJ dupficit}'. No demand for stalling the .
"privatlsatlon of GomtJ Gue\tHollii~w~sdlsc:ussed in theJi(st.co!:Jn~Jqt~~Jl[\g,J!tl~.fraf.led the Charter of Demands of the JNUSU. 1he.
.~any fT19V~ to office-bearers from SFI-AIS&-cliddgn..in the letter.demanding an explanation from the Aomiiflstratiqn·on whether.~e waprivatisa Gomli because they did notrealise on. 1.1 ~December2903, that the alarm rats&d ~yAISA was afalse one. It was indeed included in the Charter submitted to the V~ on 23rd January because the Admlniatration had not llMif'Onded till then. However, shortly after that the .
Admrnistration informed the JNUSU that no such move was baing considered. Since then that demand, which was added to the original .
Charter at AI SA's behestwas dropped. Itis evident that the agreement signed between theJNU Administration and JNUSU (which has beer:l widoly publicised) does notinclude the Gomti demand. Now either the AJSA accept thatthe threat ofprivatiaation still looms large over .
GomtJ In which case It It AISA that has compromised" on ths GomU Issue by dropping It In the Final Charter upon which the .
negotiations were based. Or, ifItls the case thatthe move was stalled only by writing that letter to the VC (how ridiculous!). then .
SFI-AISF office-bearers should also get aome credltalnce they were alao signatories to that letter. The SFI-AJSF has never claimed .
such pmeudo achlovementa. precieely because we came to know thatno such move was being considered In the firstplace, and we do not believe In deceiving the student community orIndulging In sensationalism. As far as the Mahl·Mandavi Issue is concerned, aU .
tho relovant facts have been state~ in Part II of this series. AlSA knows the truth that the students themselves had unanlmously .
doclded to pay thoae fine and tho JNUSU went by th'lrcollectlve judgemenllfAISA had felt that those 17 students had taken a'M'ong doclclon, the JNUSU had fallad to defend the atL:Ijenta' Interests, Itbeg tho question why did they notgive a call for notpaying those f\noc or agitate on the lsauo? Why could not AlBA convince them In notpaying those fines? Althouah SFI-AISF Is aware thatAISA'a doublespeak and hypocrisy would eurvlve this lengthy expose ofours, since ft Is .
loelcol fallout of their electoral opportunism, Wtt atlll continue to hope for tome lntrospectlon on Its part, for the-sake of Its own .
erodibility. .
\ (Concluded) .
sd/-.
sd/-.
Nimesh ChandraRohlt Secretary, AJSF-JNU.
Vlco Presldcn~ SFI..JNU .
.