View allAll Photos Tagged multipleexposure

After I made this image, which consists of ten individual exposures, I found myself wondering about the countless billions of creatures that have lived and died in the oceans since life first emerged on Earth. Yes, I am sometimes prone to melancholia, as you may have already noticed.

 

And what conclusion did I draw after all of that wondering?

 

That the sea is full to the brim of ghosts, that’s what.

 

If you look long enough, you can see some of them here…

Hi this is a 3 image in camera multiple exposure from New York earlier this year , thanks for looking :):)

3 images at 0.5sec, f/6.3, 105mm, iso 100

Sea View, PEI

Holga multiple exposures

City Blocks VIII

(In-Camera Multiple Exposure)

 

"Keep looking for things in places where there is nothing."

 

Another photograph of my series called "Inner Landscape".

You can find the full series on here: cargocollective.com/martbenjamin

  

"Sigue buscando cosas en lugares donde hay nada".

Jonas Mekas.

 

Otra fotografía más de una serie a la que llamé Paisaje Interior.

Pueden encontrar la serie completa en cargocollective.com/martbenjamin

  

www.instagram.com/mart.benjamin/

 

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

multiple exposure

today i tried to capture people... but the result not good for my taste hehe

i used double exposure from camera... and then removed the rest

The gentle light of the lantern meets it when I go to Senso-ji Temple at night.

35mm film double exposure image layered with cell phone cam image

Edited with vsco cam app

 

mehrfachbelichtung eines meiner, ausgedruckten fotos, beschienen von der abendsonne.

This picture is not called 'Possibly No. 14213' because the steam engine you see depicted here might (or might not) be experiencing a period of quantum instability. The title also has nothing to do with Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, although that might (or might not) go some way in explaining that aforementioned (possible) quantum instability.

 

No. It's called 'Possibly No. 14213' simply because there's a different number on the side of the machine than there is on the front, and I've chosen the side value of '14213' instead of the front value of '5' which seems to me to be somewhat lacking in ambition.

 

That is not to say, of course, that you are not perfectly entitled to consider the number '5' to be special. I respect your right to idolise whichever numbers you wish.

 

Seventeen hand-held exposures representing 1 minute of august 18th, 2019. Taken at the Weald and Downland Living Museum, West Sussex.

 

––

 

Usual caveats etc.

richmond park

golden wobble and blah

 

www.ronhewit.photography

 

This is a multiple exposure of an umbrella clothesline that was laying on the floor. Happy Slider Sunday!

As you know (unless you are a ‘flat-earther’), the Earth rotates about its axis. It does this at around 1000 miles-per-hour (mph) if you are standing on the equator. If you inhabit the higher or lower latitudes, then this figure will reduce as you get closer to your nearest pole.

 

The Earth also orbits the sun at around 67,000 mph. That’s really quite fast when you think about it - it works out at about 18.5 miles every second. But the incessant speeding doesn’t stop there. The solar system is located in the Orion Arm of our Milky Way galaxy, which, wouldn’t you know it, also rotates about its axis, this time at the really quite staggering rate of 515,000 mph or, about 143 miles-per-second.

 

“Enough!” I hear you cry.

 

Sorry, but the unrelenting race doesn’t end there either: The Milky Way is itself speeding through the infinite playground of the universe at around 1,300,000 mph. Yes. That fast. That’s about 360 miles-per-second. At that speed you could travel from the Earth to the moon in a little over eleven minutes; or you could get to Mars in about 26 hours.

 

Now, if you add all of those figures together - okay, I know that it doesn’t really work like that, but if you did… calculate… calculate… recalculate… check… you end up with a figure of… approximately 503 miles-per-second. That’s how fast you are moving. All of the time.

 

You are, quite literally, hurtling through the universe at a blistering pace.

 

But, if you stand still for a moment, relatively speaking, pretty soon you'll be able to feel the earth spinning beneath your feet. Just ask the flowers...

 

Or:

 

A flock (sic) of Daisies, at the Weald and Downland Museum.

 

Fifteen hand-held exposures representing fourteen seconds of June the 9th, 2019.

 

Usual caveats etc.

 

---------

 

NB. If I stop to consider that I have been alive for approximately 1,766,016,000 seconds, then it would appear that, so far, I have travelled… calculate… calculate… check… blimey… really? Recalculate… recalculate… check… 888,306,048,000 miles. Over 888 billion miles.

 

The title of the image is taken from the first line from the song 'Time Stands Still' by John Dowland (1563 - 1626), a version of which you can listen to here with Emma Kirkby and Anthony Rooley.

Huge thanks for all your faves and comments

Flower is beautiful, water is romantic, then what happened if flower is falling into the water? Everyone could have different answers, and here is my representation how the it could be look like, the focus is about the expression of streamline beauty.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

A conceptual multiple exposure portrait exploring the connection between identity and nature. I wanted the figure to feel both grounded and dissolving into the forest at the same time

More messing around with my camera - glad no one was watching!

Multiexposure shot of bridge in the woods at Great Warley Common

digital double exposure

vsco cam app

1 2 3 4 6 ••• 79 80