View allAll Photos Tagged icoss
Some of the old public houses in #hongkong. #dreamluxurytravel #hdr_europe #HDRCreators #hdr #modern_ruins #hk #asia #bright #saturated @modern_ruins @hdr_europe @hdrcreators #hdr_captures #igersmanila #9pmhabit #igersphilippines #ig_citing #igheartattack #photopick #thecoll #icoss #pinoyigers #themods @cclozano @edcalycay @ipetim @pinkpop27 @igersphilippines #ig_today #_ig_photobox #📷oftheday
80 Likes on Instagram
2 Comments on Instagram:
hussainphotos: beautiful ❤
mackysuson: Thank you @hussainphotos
Will you knock the door? #singapore #love #life #hdr_europe #HDRCreators #hdr_captures #awesome #swag #beautiful #cool #recentforrecent#igersmanila #9pmhabit #igersphilippines #ig_citing #igheartattack #photopick #thecoll #icoss #pinoyigers #themods @cclozano @edcalycay @ipetim @pinkpop27 @igersphilippines
111 Likes on Instagram
The journey in life is like driving a car. It's how you drive it. #car #vintage #hdr_captures #HDRCreators #hdr_europe #love #life #singapore #asia #awesome #igersmanila #9pmhabit #igersphilippines #ig_citing #igheartattack #photopick #thecoll #icoss #pinoyigers #themods @cclozano @edcalycay @ipetim @pinkpop27 @igersphilippines #ig_today
84 Likes on Instagram
1 Comments on Instagram:
mrschubbycheeks: ❤❤❤
Old shop houses in Singapore. #oldsg #singapore #hdr_europe #HDRCreators #hdr_captures #col#igersmanila #9pmhabit #igersphilippines #ig_citing #igheartattack #photopick #thecoll #icoss #pinoyigers #themods @cclozano @edcalycay @ipetim @pinkpop27 @igersphilippinesors #love #life #sg50 #beautiful #ig_today
86 Likes on Instagram
ICOSS Building
219 Portobello Street
Sheffield
The Interdisciplinary Centre of the Social Sciences houses up to 100 researchers in fields such as Criminology and Health and Social Care.
See you in 2 years #hongkong #hk #holiday #backtowork #travel #igersmanila #9pmhabit #igersphilippines #ig_citing #igheartattack #photopick #thecoll #icoss #pinoyigers #themods @kiethwalter @edcalycay @ipetim @pinkpop27 @igersphilippines #MyTraveltography #fitbit
26 Likes on Instagram
We capture water by the speed of our imagination. #hdr #hdr_europe #HDRCreators #hdr_captures #worldcaptures #singapore #water #fountain #blue #sky #beautiful #newswag #igersmanila #9pmhabit #igersphilippines #ig_citing #igheartattack #photopick #thecoll #icoss #pinoyigers #themods @cclozano @edcalycay @ipetim @pinkpop27 @igersphilippines #ig_today #📷oftheday
96 Likes on Instagram
We all are running for or from something. #jumpstagram #jump #run #runshot #adidas #adidassquare #adidasOriginals #Singapore #asian #monotone #city #beautiful #swag #cool #igersmanila #9pmhabit #igersphilippines #ig_citing #igheartattack #photopick #thecoll #icoss #pinoyigers #themods @cclozano @edcalycay @ipetim @pinkpop27 @igersphilippines
97 Likes on Instagram
1 Comments on Instagram:
mackysuson: #procamapp
Each windows represents a different story. It's like us. We are all similar but we have our own stories to tell. #window #oldsg #sg50 #singapore #lovehdr #life #beautiful #awesome #newswag #dreamluxurytravel #travel_official #igersmanila #9pmhabit #igersphilippines #ig_citing #igheartattack #photopick #thecoll #icoss #pinoyigers #themods @cclozano @edcalycay @ipetim @pinkpop27 @igersphilippines #📷oftheday
97 Likes on Instagram
5 Comments on Instagram:
mackysuson: @tumblr.vans_ what?
tumbllrandchill: Follow for a spam and follow back and comment 💚 so I know to give u one @juzmacky
anatolia7: 🌟🌟🌟
mackysuson: Thank you @anatolia7
There only 2 things you can't hide, The Sun and The Truth. #vscocam #vsco #vscogrid #singapore #dreamluxurytravel #travel_official #singapore #sun #sunset #rain #aftertherain #beautiful #life #love #igersmanila #9pmhabit #igersphilippines #ig_citing #igheartattack #photopick #thecoll #icoss #pinoyigers #themods @cclozano @edcalycay @ipetim @pinkpop27 @igersphilippines
99 Likes on Instagram
3 Comments on Instagram:
mackysuson: #bevsco
goldeyes: 😍😍😍
mackysuson: Thank you @goldeyes :)))
Workshop on the Judicial Reforms under the Revitalized Peace Agreement
Since the Comprehensive Peace Agreement of 2005 and after independence in 2011, South Sudan has been governed under the Interim Constitution of Southern Sudan 2005 (ICOSS) and the Transitional Constitution of South Sudan 2011 (TCOSS).
After independence in July 2011, the Government of the Republic of South Sudan (GRSS) initiated a permanent constitution making process, led by the National Constitutional Review Commission, which was truncated by the outbreak of conflict in December 2013. The Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (ARCSS) 2015 contained provisions for a permanent constitution-making process, but these were not activated before the outbreak of further conflict in Juba in July 2016, which ultimately resulted in the collapse of the ARCSS.
A critical element of the governance reforms stipulated in the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (R-ARCSS) 2018 is the process of making a Permanent Constitution. Chapter 6 of the R-ARCSS outlines the permanent constitution making process, which is expected, inter alia, to pave the way for elections at the end of the transitional period.
In terms of peacebuilding in post-conflict South Sudan, the role of the judiciary as a primary accountability and conflict resolution mechanism cannot be overstated especially given that many key political and other disputes will eventually come before the judiciary.
The judiciary in South Sudan has attained many significant milestones since the independence of the young nation. In the current post-conflict context of the country, the judiciary is facing major infrastructure, capacity and financial challenges.
In the case of South Sudan, accountability mechanisms include statutory judicial institutions and traditional or customary system both of which discharge justice across the country. In cognizance of the interdependence of these two systems, judicial reforms will encompass all these areas. It is instructive to note that judicial reforms must ‘culminate in strengthening institutions of government, thereby enhancing constitutional democracy.’
The scope, content and process of the judicial reforms envisaged under the R-ARCSS therefore require in-depth discussion and review by the relevant stakeholders in order to ensure effective implementation of the judicial reforms and the permanent constitution-making process.
Workshop on the Judicial Reforms under the Revitalized Peace Agreement
Since the Comprehensive Peace Agreement of 2005 and after independence in 2011, South Sudan has been governed under the Interim Constitution of Southern Sudan 2005 (ICOSS) and the Transitional Constitution of South Sudan 2011 (TCOSS).
After independence in July 2011, the Government of the Republic of South Sudan (GRSS) initiated a permanent constitution making process, led by the National Constitutional Review Commission, which was truncated by the outbreak of conflict in December 2013. The Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (ARCSS) 2015 contained provisions for a permanent constitution-making process, but these were not activated before the outbreak of further conflict in Juba in July 2016, which ultimately resulted in the collapse of the ARCSS.
A critical element of the governance reforms stipulated in the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (R-ARCSS) 2018 is the process of making a Permanent Constitution. Chapter 6 of the R-ARCSS outlines the permanent constitution making process, which is expected, inter alia, to pave the way for elections at the end of the transitional period.
In terms of peacebuilding in post-conflict South Sudan, the role of the judiciary as a primary accountability and conflict resolution mechanism cannot be overstated especially given that many key political and other disputes will eventually come before the judiciary.
The judiciary in South Sudan has attained many significant milestones since the independence of the young nation. In the current post-conflict context of the country, the judiciary is facing major infrastructure, capacity and financial challenges.
In the case of South Sudan, accountability mechanisms include statutory judicial institutions and traditional or customary system both of which discharge justice across the country. In cognizance of the interdependence of these two systems, judicial reforms will encompass all these areas. It is instructive to note that judicial reforms must ‘culminate in strengthening institutions of government, thereby enhancing constitutional democracy.’
The scope, content and process of the judicial reforms envisaged under the R-ARCSS therefore require in-depth discussion and review by the relevant stakeholders in order to ensure effective implementation of the judicial reforms and the permanent constitution-making process.
Workshop on the Judicial Reforms under the Revitalized Peace Agreement
Since the Comprehensive Peace Agreement of 2005 and after independence in 2011, South Sudan has been governed under the Interim Constitution of Southern Sudan 2005 (ICOSS) and the Transitional Constitution of South Sudan 2011 (TCOSS).
After independence in July 2011, the Government of the Republic of South Sudan (GRSS) initiated a permanent constitution making process, led by the National Constitutional Review Commission, which was truncated by the outbreak of conflict in December 2013. The Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (ARCSS) 2015 contained provisions for a permanent constitution-making process, but these were not activated before the outbreak of further conflict in Juba in July 2016, which ultimately resulted in the collapse of the ARCSS.
A critical element of the governance reforms stipulated in the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (R-ARCSS) 2018 is the process of making a Permanent Constitution. Chapter 6 of the R-ARCSS outlines the permanent constitution making process, which is expected, inter alia, to pave the way for elections at the end of the transitional period.
In terms of peacebuilding in post-conflict South Sudan, the role of the judiciary as a primary accountability and conflict resolution mechanism cannot be overstated especially given that many key political and other disputes will eventually come before the judiciary.
The judiciary in South Sudan has attained many significant milestones since the independence of the young nation. In the current post-conflict context of the country, the judiciary is facing major infrastructure, capacity and financial challenges.
In the case of South Sudan, accountability mechanisms include statutory judicial institutions and traditional or customary system both of which discharge justice across the country. In cognizance of the interdependence of these two systems, judicial reforms will encompass all these areas. It is instructive to note that judicial reforms must ‘culminate in strengthening institutions of government, thereby enhancing constitutional democracy.’
The scope, content and process of the judicial reforms envisaged under the R-ARCSS therefore require in-depth discussion and review by the relevant stakeholders in order to ensure effective implementation of the judicial reforms and the permanent constitution-making process.
Workshop on the Judicial Reforms under the Revitalized Peace Agreement
Since the Comprehensive Peace Agreement of 2005 and after independence in 2011, South Sudan has been governed under the Interim Constitution of Southern Sudan 2005 (ICOSS) and the Transitional Constitution of South Sudan 2011 (TCOSS).
After independence in July 2011, the Government of the Republic of South Sudan (GRSS) initiated a permanent constitution making process, led by the National Constitutional Review Commission, which was truncated by the outbreak of conflict in December 2013. The Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (ARCSS) 2015 contained provisions for a permanent constitution-making process, but these were not activated before the outbreak of further conflict in Juba in July 2016, which ultimately resulted in the collapse of the ARCSS.
A critical element of the governance reforms stipulated in the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (R-ARCSS) 2018 is the process of making a Permanent Constitution. Chapter 6 of the R-ARCSS outlines the permanent constitution making process, which is expected, inter alia, to pave the way for elections at the end of the transitional period.
In terms of peacebuilding in post-conflict South Sudan, the role of the judiciary as a primary accountability and conflict resolution mechanism cannot be overstated especially given that many key political and other disputes will eventually come before the judiciary.
The judiciary in South Sudan has attained many significant milestones since the independence of the young nation. In the current post-conflict context of the country, the judiciary is facing major infrastructure, capacity and financial challenges.
In the case of South Sudan, accountability mechanisms include statutory judicial institutions and traditional or customary system both of which discharge justice across the country. In cognizance of the interdependence of these two systems, judicial reforms will encompass all these areas. It is instructive to note that judicial reforms must ‘culminate in strengthening institutions of government, thereby enhancing constitutional democracy.’
The scope, content and process of the judicial reforms envisaged under the R-ARCSS therefore require in-depth discussion and review by the relevant stakeholders in order to ensure effective implementation of the judicial reforms and the permanent constitution-making process.
Workshop on the Judicial Reforms under the Revitalized Peace Agreement
Since the Comprehensive Peace Agreement of 2005 and after independence in 2011, South Sudan has been governed under the Interim Constitution of Southern Sudan 2005 (ICOSS) and the Transitional Constitution of South Sudan 2011 (TCOSS).
After independence in July 2011, the Government of the Republic of South Sudan (GRSS) initiated a permanent constitution making process, led by the National Constitutional Review Commission, which was truncated by the outbreak of conflict in December 2013. The Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (ARCSS) 2015 contained provisions for a permanent constitution-making process, but these were not activated before the outbreak of further conflict in Juba in July 2016, which ultimately resulted in the collapse of the ARCSS.
A critical element of the governance reforms stipulated in the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (R-ARCSS) 2018 is the process of making a Permanent Constitution. Chapter 6 of the R-ARCSS outlines the permanent constitution making process, which is expected, inter alia, to pave the way for elections at the end of the transitional period.
In terms of peacebuilding in post-conflict South Sudan, the role of the judiciary as a primary accountability and conflict resolution mechanism cannot be overstated especially given that many key political and other disputes will eventually come before the judiciary.
The judiciary in South Sudan has attained many significant milestones since the independence of the young nation. In the current post-conflict context of the country, the judiciary is facing major infrastructure, capacity and financial challenges.
In the case of South Sudan, accountability mechanisms include statutory judicial institutions and traditional or customary system both of which discharge justice across the country. In cognizance of the interdependence of these two systems, judicial reforms will encompass all these areas. It is instructive to note that judicial reforms must ‘culminate in strengthening institutions of government, thereby enhancing constitutional democracy.’
The scope, content and process of the judicial reforms envisaged under the R-ARCSS therefore require in-depth discussion and review by the relevant stakeholders in order to ensure effective implementation of the judicial reforms and the permanent constitution-making process.
The Interdisciplinary Centre of the Social Sciences (ICOSS), University of Sheffield.
Another picture taken and uploaded for the Guess Where UK group.
Workshop on the Judicial Reforms under the Revitalized Peace Agreement
Since the Comprehensive Peace Agreement of 2005 and after independence in 2011, South Sudan has been governed under the Interim Constitution of Southern Sudan 2005 (ICOSS) and the Transitional Constitution of South Sudan 2011 (TCOSS).
After independence in July 2011, the Government of the Republic of South Sudan (GRSS) initiated a permanent constitution making process, led by the National Constitutional Review Commission, which was truncated by the outbreak of conflict in December 2013. The Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (ARCSS) 2015 contained provisions for a permanent constitution-making process, but these were not activated before the outbreak of further conflict in Juba in July 2016, which ultimately resulted in the collapse of the ARCSS.
A critical element of the governance reforms stipulated in the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (R-ARCSS) 2018 is the process of making a Permanent Constitution. Chapter 6 of the R-ARCSS outlines the permanent constitution making process, which is expected, inter alia, to pave the way for elections at the end of the transitional period.
In terms of peacebuilding in post-conflict South Sudan, the role of the judiciary as a primary accountability and conflict resolution mechanism cannot be overstated especially given that many key political and other disputes will eventually come before the judiciary.
The judiciary in South Sudan has attained many significant milestones since the independence of the young nation. In the current post-conflict context of the country, the judiciary is facing major infrastructure, capacity and financial challenges.
In the case of South Sudan, accountability mechanisms include statutory judicial institutions and traditional or customary system both of which discharge justice across the country. In cognizance of the interdependence of these two systems, judicial reforms will encompass all these areas. It is instructive to note that judicial reforms must ‘culminate in strengthening institutions of government, thereby enhancing constitutional democracy.’
The scope, content and process of the judicial reforms envisaged under the R-ARCSS therefore require in-depth discussion and review by the relevant stakeholders in order to ensure effective implementation of the judicial reforms and the permanent constitution-making process.
Workshop on the Judicial Reforms under the Revitalized Peace Agreement
Since the Comprehensive Peace Agreement of 2005 and after independence in 2011, South Sudan has been governed under the Interim Constitution of Southern Sudan 2005 (ICOSS) and the Transitional Constitution of South Sudan 2011 (TCOSS).
After independence in July 2011, the Government of the Republic of South Sudan (GRSS) initiated a permanent constitution making process, led by the National Constitutional Review Commission, which was truncated by the outbreak of conflict in December 2013. The Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (ARCSS) 2015 contained provisions for a permanent constitution-making process, but these were not activated before the outbreak of further conflict in Juba in July 2016, which ultimately resulted in the collapse of the ARCSS.
A critical element of the governance reforms stipulated in the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (R-ARCSS) 2018 is the process of making a Permanent Constitution. Chapter 6 of the R-ARCSS outlines the permanent constitution making process, which is expected, inter alia, to pave the way for elections at the end of the transitional period.
In terms of peacebuilding in post-conflict South Sudan, the role of the judiciary as a primary accountability and conflict resolution mechanism cannot be overstated especially given that many key political and other disputes will eventually come before the judiciary.
The judiciary in South Sudan has attained many significant milestones since the independence of the young nation. In the current post-conflict context of the country, the judiciary is facing major infrastructure, capacity and financial challenges.
In the case of South Sudan, accountability mechanisms include statutory judicial institutions and traditional or customary system both of which discharge justice across the country. In cognizance of the interdependence of these two systems, judicial reforms will encompass all these areas. It is instructive to note that judicial reforms must ‘culminate in strengthening institutions of government, thereby enhancing constitutional democracy.’
The scope, content and process of the judicial reforms envisaged under the R-ARCSS therefore require in-depth discussion and review by the relevant stakeholders in order to ensure effective implementation of the judicial reforms and the permanent constitution-making process.
Workshop on the Judicial Reforms under the Revitalized Peace Agreement
Since the Comprehensive Peace Agreement of 2005 and after independence in 2011, South Sudan has been governed under the Interim Constitution of Southern Sudan 2005 (ICOSS) and the Transitional Constitution of South Sudan 2011 (TCOSS).
After independence in July 2011, the Government of the Republic of South Sudan (GRSS) initiated a permanent constitution making process, led by the National Constitutional Review Commission, which was truncated by the outbreak of conflict in December 2013. The Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (ARCSS) 2015 contained provisions for a permanent constitution-making process, but these were not activated before the outbreak of further conflict in Juba in July 2016, which ultimately resulted in the collapse of the ARCSS.
A critical element of the governance reforms stipulated in the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (R-ARCSS) 2018 is the process of making a Permanent Constitution. Chapter 6 of the R-ARCSS outlines the permanent constitution making process, which is expected, inter alia, to pave the way for elections at the end of the transitional period.
In terms of peacebuilding in post-conflict South Sudan, the role of the judiciary as a primary accountability and conflict resolution mechanism cannot be overstated especially given that many key political and other disputes will eventually come before the judiciary.
The judiciary in South Sudan has attained many significant milestones since the independence of the young nation. In the current post-conflict context of the country, the judiciary is facing major infrastructure, capacity and financial challenges.
In the case of South Sudan, accountability mechanisms include statutory judicial institutions and traditional or customary system both of which discharge justice across the country. In cognizance of the interdependence of these two systems, judicial reforms will encompass all these areas. It is instructive to note that judicial reforms must ‘culminate in strengthening institutions of government, thereby enhancing constitutional democracy.’
The scope, content and process of the judicial reforms envisaged under the R-ARCSS therefore require in-depth discussion and review by the relevant stakeholders in order to ensure effective implementation of the judicial reforms and the permanent constitution-making process.
Workshop on the Judicial Reforms under the Revitalized Peace Agreement
Since the Comprehensive Peace Agreement of 2005 and after independence in 2011, South Sudan has been governed under the Interim Constitution of Southern Sudan 2005 (ICOSS) and the Transitional Constitution of South Sudan 2011 (TCOSS).
After independence in July 2011, the Government of the Republic of South Sudan (GRSS) initiated a permanent constitution making process, led by the National Constitutional Review Commission, which was truncated by the outbreak of conflict in December 2013. The Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (ARCSS) 2015 contained provisions for a permanent constitution-making process, but these were not activated before the outbreak of further conflict in Juba in July 2016, which ultimately resulted in the collapse of the ARCSS.
A critical element of the governance reforms stipulated in the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (R-ARCSS) 2018 is the process of making a Permanent Constitution. Chapter 6 of the R-ARCSS outlines the permanent constitution making process, which is expected, inter alia, to pave the way for elections at the end of the transitional period.
In terms of peacebuilding in post-conflict South Sudan, the role of the judiciary as a primary accountability and conflict resolution mechanism cannot be overstated especially given that many key political and other disputes will eventually come before the judiciary.
The judiciary in South Sudan has attained many significant milestones since the independence of the young nation. In the current post-conflict context of the country, the judiciary is facing major infrastructure, capacity and financial challenges.
In the case of South Sudan, accountability mechanisms include statutory judicial institutions and traditional or customary system both of which discharge justice across the country. In cognizance of the interdependence of these two systems, judicial reforms will encompass all these areas. It is instructive to note that judicial reforms must ‘culminate in strengthening institutions of government, thereby enhancing constitutional democracy.’
The scope, content and process of the judicial reforms envisaged under the R-ARCSS therefore require in-depth discussion and review by the relevant stakeholders in order to ensure effective implementation of the judicial reforms and the permanent constitution-making process.
Workshop on the Judicial Reforms under the Revitalized Peace Agreement
Since the Comprehensive Peace Agreement of 2005 and after independence in 2011, South Sudan has been governed under the Interim Constitution of Southern Sudan 2005 (ICOSS) and the Transitional Constitution of South Sudan 2011 (TCOSS).
After independence in July 2011, the Government of the Republic of South Sudan (GRSS) initiated a permanent constitution making process, led by the National Constitutional Review Commission, which was truncated by the outbreak of conflict in December 2013. The Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (ARCSS) 2015 contained provisions for a permanent constitution-making process, but these were not activated before the outbreak of further conflict in Juba in July 2016, which ultimately resulted in the collapse of the ARCSS.
A critical element of the governance reforms stipulated in the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (R-ARCSS) 2018 is the process of making a Permanent Constitution. Chapter 6 of the R-ARCSS outlines the permanent constitution making process, which is expected, inter alia, to pave the way for elections at the end of the transitional period.
In terms of peacebuilding in post-conflict South Sudan, the role of the judiciary as a primary accountability and conflict resolution mechanism cannot be overstated especially given that many key political and other disputes will eventually come before the judiciary.
The judiciary in South Sudan has attained many significant milestones since the independence of the young nation. In the current post-conflict context of the country, the judiciary is facing major infrastructure, capacity and financial challenges.
In the case of South Sudan, accountability mechanisms include statutory judicial institutions and traditional or customary system both of which discharge justice across the country. In cognizance of the interdependence of these two systems, judicial reforms will encompass all these areas. It is instructive to note that judicial reforms must ‘culminate in strengthening institutions of government, thereby enhancing constitutional democracy.’
The scope, content and process of the judicial reforms envisaged under the R-ARCSS therefore require in-depth discussion and review by the relevant stakeholders in order to ensure effective implementation of the judicial reforms and the permanent constitution-making process.
Workshop on the Judicial Reforms under the Revitalized Peace Agreement
Since the Comprehensive Peace Agreement of 2005 and after independence in 2011, South Sudan has been governed under the Interim Constitution of Southern Sudan 2005 (ICOSS) and the Transitional Constitution of South Sudan 2011 (TCOSS).
After independence in July 2011, the Government of the Republic of South Sudan (GRSS) initiated a permanent constitution making process, led by the National Constitutional Review Commission, which was truncated by the outbreak of conflict in December 2013. The Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (ARCSS) 2015 contained provisions for a permanent constitution-making process, but these were not activated before the outbreak of further conflict in Juba in July 2016, which ultimately resulted in the collapse of the ARCSS.
A critical element of the governance reforms stipulated in the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (R-ARCSS) 2018 is the process of making a Permanent Constitution. Chapter 6 of the R-ARCSS outlines the permanent constitution making process, which is expected, inter alia, to pave the way for elections at the end of the transitional period.
In terms of peacebuilding in post-conflict South Sudan, the role of the judiciary as a primary accountability and conflict resolution mechanism cannot be overstated especially given that many key political and other disputes will eventually come before the judiciary.
The judiciary in South Sudan has attained many significant milestones since the independence of the young nation. In the current post-conflict context of the country, the judiciary is facing major infrastructure, capacity and financial challenges.
In the case of South Sudan, accountability mechanisms include statutory judicial institutions and traditional or customary system both of which discharge justice across the country. In cognizance of the interdependence of these two systems, judicial reforms will encompass all these areas. It is instructive to note that judicial reforms must ‘culminate in strengthening institutions of government, thereby enhancing constitutional democracy.’
The scope, content and process of the judicial reforms envisaged under the R-ARCSS therefore require in-depth discussion and review by the relevant stakeholders in order to ensure effective implementation of the judicial reforms and the permanent constitution-making process.
Workshop on the Judicial Reforms under the Revitalized Peace Agreement
Since the Comprehensive Peace Agreement of 2005 and after independence in 2011, South Sudan has been governed under the Interim Constitution of Southern Sudan 2005 (ICOSS) and the Transitional Constitution of South Sudan 2011 (TCOSS).
After independence in July 2011, the Government of the Republic of South Sudan (GRSS) initiated a permanent constitution making process, led by the National Constitutional Review Commission, which was truncated by the outbreak of conflict in December 2013. The Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (ARCSS) 2015 contained provisions for a permanent constitution-making process, but these were not activated before the outbreak of further conflict in Juba in July 2016, which ultimately resulted in the collapse of the ARCSS.
A critical element of the governance reforms stipulated in the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (R-ARCSS) 2018 is the process of making a Permanent Constitution. Chapter 6 of the R-ARCSS outlines the permanent constitution making process, which is expected, inter alia, to pave the way for elections at the end of the transitional period.
In terms of peacebuilding in post-conflict South Sudan, the role of the judiciary as a primary accountability and conflict resolution mechanism cannot be overstated especially given that many key political and other disputes will eventually come before the judiciary.
The judiciary in South Sudan has attained many significant milestones since the independence of the young nation. In the current post-conflict context of the country, the judiciary is facing major infrastructure, capacity and financial challenges.
In the case of South Sudan, accountability mechanisms include statutory judicial institutions and traditional or customary system both of which discharge justice across the country. In cognizance of the interdependence of these two systems, judicial reforms will encompass all these areas. It is instructive to note that judicial reforms must ‘culminate in strengthening institutions of government, thereby enhancing constitutional democracy.’
The scope, content and process of the judicial reforms envisaged under the R-ARCSS therefore require in-depth discussion and review by the relevant stakeholders in order to ensure effective implementation of the judicial reforms and the permanent constitution-making process.
I love to travel. One of my favorite places in the world is boracay. Of course, I love fashion too! #boracay #fun #selfie #love #life #celavie #asia #asian #rayban #topman #IGersManila #SelfieSaturday #ktgvr #IGHeartAttack #9pmhabit #itsmorefuninthephilippines #phoneography #iCoss
155 Likes on Instagram
ICOSS Building
219 Portobello Street
Sheffield
The Interdisciplinary Centre of the Social Sciences houses up to 100 researchers in fields such as Criminology and Health and Social Care.
Senior alumnus, Dr S N Ebrahimi, returns to Management School to share his expertise
The Management School and Development and Alumni Relations Office were delighted to welcome distinguished alumnus, Dr S N Ebrahimi back to the University last week. Dr Ebrahimi, an expert in international law, shared his expertise on ‘How to establish the balancing power between risks and rewards in industry contracts’ with a fascinated audience of staff and students at the University’s ICOSS building.