View allAll Photos Tagged existentialism
Epicurus Explains How To Be Happy And Why Pleasure Matters | Real AI Voice Interview
What Epicurus Really Taught About Life, Happiness, and Pleasure
#epicurusquotes #aiinterview #meaningoflife
Epicurus is often misunderstood. Many think he supported wild pleasure, but that’s not true. In this video, you’ll hear his real ideas about life, happiness, and peace of mind. He believed that true pleasure means being calm, having good friends, and no pain. This AI video uses his own words to explain his views on how to live a better life.
✅ Timestamps:
00:00 – Intro with Epicurus in Person (AI)
01:35 – Not to explain the world, but to make people happy
03:11 – Sensations Is Everything
04:26 – Hedonism, drunkenness, and gluttony
05:27 – Epicurus’ True Values
06:47 – Poems of the Student Philodemus
🔗 Stay Connected With Us.
🔔' .
www.youtube.com/@shcherbakov_s/?sub_confirmation=1
📩 For business inquiries: museum.of.meaning@gmail.com
=============================
🎬Suggested videos for you:
▶️ www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdvYg5bOsnU
▶️ www.youtube.com/watch?v=0z8dzE3DLYw
▶️ www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuruBbRXKXE
▶️ www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxW5sTjV7S0
=============================
#epicurusquotes #aiinterview #meaningoflife #philosophyexplained #greekphilosophy #epicureanism
Epicurus Explains How To Be Happy And Why Pleasure Matters | Real AI Voice Interview
www.youtube.com/watch?v=rehUy64lC-s
via Shcherbakov
www.youtube.com/channel/UCfcFBdM7uayu4U5H1PBr5UA
September 20, 2025 at 05:45AM
via Shcherbakov ift.tt/6frPnLu
"Huis Clos" Play Rehearsal In Progress. Follow us www.mesmeriseme.co.uk/what-is-hell, twitter.com/#!/HuisClos_2011, www.facebook.com/pages/Huis-Clos-MesmeriseMe-2011/1212970...
Newest project work, the theme being Existentialism. I chose to look at how people perceive their own freedom and take it for granted, and in doing so, raise awareness for prisoners of concience. Inspired by the story of Burmese Khun Bedu, serving a 37 year prison sentence for a peaceful protest- launching a wave of informative balloons, I have designed a website giving users a platform to express and use their freedom by customizing a balloon with their own beliefs and release it upon the internet. It gives users an appreciation for their Existentialist human rights and opens their eyes to injustice worldwide. The imagery of the balloon pulling along the burden of its ball and chain highlights the potential consequences- the price of freedom. Though until the user's freedom has been exercised, the ball and chain remains hidden- its appearance leading to users questioning their freedom- "Would I have made that decision had I known the consequences?". Not knowing the risks made them truly free.
The beautiful truth is that we as human beings are free to stand against what we choose, despite the consequences. Khun Bedu and other prisoners of concience are serving unjust sentences and must be freed, but until this is achieved, they are still essentially free to believe. The balloons will continute to float despite their heavy burden.
The grave of Jean-Paul Sartre & Simone de Beauvoir; I call this 'Existentialism is Dead (and here it lies)'.
I am very interested in my future. While I was talking to my friend one day, I learned that people actually like to talk about their past and future, sometimes even put bigger value in what happened in the past than the present. They also concern about their future, but they do not put as much attention to the “present” time compared to other period of time. It was quite ironic to see that people would put more effort in focusing on what already had happened and what will be happening without realizing how the time that I am living in can be the most truthful and realistic stage of me. This drawing shows the different periods of time throughout a person’s life. I illustrated the repetition in time structure in this art work to show that I am able to recall all the memories and worry about the unknown future because I am existing in this world right at the moment.
We all thought it'd be funny if Tom sat at a table by himself with a near-empty pitcher of beer.
Half-empty or half-full-of-self-destructive-tendencies?
Perception is often imagined as reception. We speak as though the world comes to us first in a pure condition and only later becomes colored by interpretation. The eye sees, the mind records, and then thought begins its work. But lived experience rarely grants us that innocence. The world does not present itself as untouched material waiting for neutral assembly. It arrives already passing through the structures of the one who sees: through memory, desire, fear, expectation, grief, longing, conscience, and all the hidden habits by which a soul has learned to inhabit reality. This image turns toward that prior involvement. The young man stands inside the terminal at night, looking outward through glass, yet his reflection overlays the city beyond. What he sees and what he is cannot be cleanly separated. The outer scene and the inward seer have already entered one another.
That structure belongs deeply to the lived-world of Confessions to the Empty Chair. The book repeatedly shows that perception is never merely optical. It is existential. A person does not simply behold a world; he beholds a world through the shape he has become. This is why so many scenes in the book carry more than factual content. A room is never only a room. A conversation is never only an exchange of words. A silence is never only the absence of speech. Every moment arrives already weighted by who the perceiver is in that moment. The self stands in front of reality not as a blank lens, but as a formed being whose interior history is already participating in what appears.
Phenomenologically, the image concerns the impossibility of untouched givenness in ordinary human experience. The glass wall is central because it preserves both outward visibility and inward return. The city lights beyond suggest an external world continuing in its own life, dense with movement, space, and significance. Yet the reflection of the man in the same surface refuses any fantasy of pure externality. He cannot simply look out. He is also there, faintly present in the act of looking. This is one of the deepest truths of consciousness: seeing is never a transaction between a detached subject and a mute object. The subject is implicated in the appearing of the world. What is seen is already shaped by the conditions of the seeing.
That does not mean reality is unreal or merely projected. The point is subtler and more demanding. The world is real, but it is encountered through a self that is never neutral. In Confessions to the Empty Chair, this lack of neutrality matters because it exposes both the dignity and danger of perception. The self is not a machine. It is interpretive all the way down. What it loves, what it fears, what it expects, what it has suffered, what it refuses to confront—all of these influence the field of appearance. A person may believe he is simply noticing what is there, when in fact he is also noticing according to what he has become. The book returns again and again to this humbling realization: one’s way of seeing is itself morally and spiritually significant.
Psychologically, the image addresses the active role of inward structure in perception. Human beings do not attend evenly. They do not receive significance democratically. They are drawn toward certain features, arrested by certain cues, activated by certain patterns, softened by certain atmospheres, threatened by certain ambiguities. The terminal setting intensifies this because terminals are places of passage, waiting, transition, and projection. One stands in such a space not only with one’s body, but with one’s anticipations. The world beyond the glass is therefore never simply “outside.” It becomes a field onto which longing, uncertainty, memory, and self-understanding may already be cast. The man’s reflection layered over the night city captures that condition precisely. He is not merely seeing the city. He is seeing it through his own unresolved presence.
There is also a theological seriousness here. In deeper spiritual terms, the fallen or wounded self does not perceive innocently. It does not enter the world free of distortion. Yet this condition is not only a source of error; it is also the very place where revelation becomes possible. Because the self is involved, perception can expose the self. What I see, how I see, what appears bright to me, what disappears into the margins for me—these reveal something about my inward order. Confessions to the Empty Chair treats this with particular care. It understands that perception is not merely a window through which truth enters. It is also a mirror in which the soul’s condition is disclosed. The world shows itself, but in doing so it also reveals the viewer.
This is why the image’s mood matters. The lighting is cool, restrained, and expansive rather than intimate. The terminal is open, not enclosed. There is no cozy interior to soften the philosophical claim. The scene is transitional and public, yet inwardly charged. A few distant travelers move in blur behind him, which reinforces the fact that human beings can inhabit the same environment while living inside different perceptual worlds. For one person, this is simply a station at night. For another, it has become a field of doubled meaning. The difference does not lie solely in the architecture. It lies in the perceiver.
In the broader world of the book, this insight becomes essential because it changes how a life must be read. If the world never arrives untouched, then no memory, desire, fear, or judgment can be understood merely by cataloging external facts. One must also ask what kind of self was receiving those facts. What wounds were already active? What hopes were already searching? What shame was already bending the angle of vision? What hunger was already assigning weight? The same city, the same room, the same face, the same silence may appear utterly differently depending on who stands before it. The book’s existential force depends on that recognition. Reality is not reduced to subjectivity, but neither is subjectivity absent from reality’s disclosure.
“The World Did Not Arrive Untouched” therefore names a fundamental truth of human consciousness. We do not first receive a neutral world and only afterward give it meaning. We receive a world already entering relation with our formation. The city beyond the glass is real. The reflection in the glass is also real. The image’s philosophical and psychological force lies in refusing to choose between them. Outer reality and inward structure meet in the act of perception. That meeting is where meaning begins.
In Confessions to the Empty Chair, this is one of the foundational recognitions from which many later insights unfold. Desire can distort because perception was already involved. Memory can reconstruct because the past was never retained apart from a self. Conscience can interrupt because the world was never morally flat. Absence can acquire gravity because significance is never distributed neutrally. Everything begins here, in the humbling knowledge that seeing is never untouched. The world comes to us, yes—but never without first passing through the mystery, burden, and formation of the one who sees it.
Day 263 - Worldviews increasingly divide…disunity ensues…Talking to a friend about his belief in absurdism last week, he led me to an article and I quote:
Absurdism is the unifier of existentialism and nihilism: it accepts that we seem to function best with some sort of religious belief in our lives, but that science has shown the nihilists are right about both revealed meaning and constructed meaning. As a result, many choose to use some parts of a meaning structure—either borrowed or constructed—to get the human benefits thereof, but without relaxing so far that they start believing it’s true.Absurdism is about working within our human limitations, but without abandoning our respect for ourselves or the truth. Absurdists often either adopt or construct a belief structure that provides a day-to-day reprieve from the crushing impossibility of true meaning. Such constructs allow us to trick our evolution-soaked brains into extracting meaning from the universe, while never forgetting that the system itself is a trick.This awareness is the difference between rebellion and surrender.A person who has surrendered will say that they believe in their construct completely, and that it provides true meaning in the universe, while someone who has not surrendered may say they’ve adopted a scaffolding for practical reasons, but they know it’s artificial.From stephen-l-france.com/day-263-worldviews-increasingly-divi...
.
-··--. ·--,_ -~ j ~· u " ··--' ___ ;o_;.,_._,..__. ---"-1..................
.
l ~ .
~.
.
,, .
.. .
.
.
~ .
·.. Ludwig \Vittgentein, 1953, Philosophical Investigation, Oxford: Blackwell.E. HusserL 1952, Ideas, trans. _\V.R. Boyce Gibson, London: Maomillan Co. ·Martin I-Ieidegger, 1978, Being and Time, trans. J. Maoquanie and E. Robinson, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. .
B.K. !vfatilal, 1982, Logic,·Language andReality, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. .
J.L. 1·fohanty, l992,Reason and,Tradition in Indian Philosophy, New Delhi: Oxford University Press. · .
Supplementa1y Texts: .
F. Nietzsche, 1886 (1966), Beyond Good and Evil, trans. Kaufinan, New York: Vikking. .
.
Immanuel Kant, 1948, Groundwork ofthe Metaphysics ofMorals, trans. and ed. H.J. Paton, London. .
S.N. Dasgupta, 1922,A Nistoty ofIndian Philosophy, Voll, Cambridge: Catllbridge University Press. .
O.E. Moore, 1952, Some Main Problems ofPhilosophy, London. Iieidegger, 1958, What isPhilosophy? New York: Twayne Publications. .
B. RusselL 1959,Problems ofFhilosophy, Oxford: OUP. .
J.P. Sartre; L960, Problem ofMethod, trans. H.E. Barnes, London: Methuen. \V.V.O. Quine: 1960; Word and Object, Cambridge Mass: MIT Press. .
P.F. Strawson, 1966, The Bounds ofSense: An Essay on Kant's Critique ofPure Reason .
.
London: Methuen·. Jonathan Bennett, 1966, Kant'sAnalytic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. .
M. Clay and Keith Lehrer, Knowledge and Skepticism, .
Peter Unger, 1971, 'A Defence ofSkepticsm,, PhilosophicalReview, 80. .
.
H.0. Gadamer, 'Practical Philosophy as a Model of Hwnan Sciences,'.
.
William James, 1975,Pragmatism:A New Name for Some Old Ways ofThin/....ing, Cambridge Mass: :Harvard University Press. .
J. Denida, 1976, OfGrammatology, trans. G.E. Speibak, Baltimore: John Hoplins University Press. .
B.K. Mati1al, 1977, Inaugural Lecture at All Souls College. Oxford: Clarendon Press. .
George Steiner, 1978, Heidegger, Glasgo: Fontana/Collins .
Richard Rorty, 'Philosophy Without Mirror,, Philosophy and the Mirr-or ofNature, .
.
Princeton: Princeton University Press. Kurt Mueller-Vollmer, 1985, The Hermeneutic Reader, Oxford: Basil Blackwell ' Torn Nagel, 1986,A View From Nowhere, Oxford: Oxford University Press. .
K.R. \Vestphal, 1983, Hegel's Episte1nologicalRealism:A Study ofthe Aim andlvfethod of .
\ Hegel's Phenomenology ofSpirit, Dordrecht Kluwer. .
.
M.K. Bhadra, 1990,A Critical Survey ofPhenomenology and Existentialism.. Ne-vv DeL'U: ICPR. .
Karl Potter and S. Bhattaoharyya, 1993, Indian PhilosophicalAnalysis, in Encyclopaedia of Indian Philosophies, vol.6,. Delhi: Motilal Banarasidass. .
B.K. Matilal, 1986,Perception, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Daya Krishna, Indian Philosophy: The CounterPerspective, Ne·w Delhi: Oxford University Press. .
Charles Taylor, 1995 (l997),Philosophica1Argunzents, Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press. .
.
Mrinal ,Miri, 2003, Id~ntity and Moral Life, New Delhi and New York: Oxford University Press. .
.
~7--.
~ .
I .
4 I I .
.
.
.
.