View allAll Photos Tagged charts
PLEASE NOTE:
I took this pipe shape chart off the internet I did not make it nor am I selling copies of it. I have add it to this collection of images to get none pipe smokers a point of reference about the different names of the shapes of tobacco pipes.
Please Listen to this song while viewing these images :)
рок-н-ролл
Do NOT post these anywhere else. They are for personal viewing only and a tool for those who want to learn how to ID the animals.
......
These photos, and any other media created and displayed, may not be copied, edited, redistributed, or displayed without expressed written permission from the creator. Any unauthorized use is strictly prohibited. © Laura SeaWolf. All Rights Reserved.
.......
Any copyright violations may result in the removal of any publicly displayed photos.
This is a work portrait that is used in Org Charts, reports and other business needs. I have been working to make the images I take be the best I possibly can. Hours, days, weeks, months and years I have been working with Photoshop since version 1.5. I have learned a great deal about Beauty and Fashion retouching and have put some of that learning into the portraits that I shoot. Now when I submit portraits for publication, reports or other needs, everyone knows who took the images because they stand out from the rest of the other Divisions in the company. That makes me feel pretty good! Photoshop has made me pretty popular with the ladies! Haha!
Strobist Stuff: Canon 1D Mk IV, 85mm 1.2 L II lens, Mola Setti Dish with sock, hair light and background light. Sekonic L758DR, Pocket Wizard Plus II's.
be sure to view the comparison chart on Full Screen
OK. At first glimpse, this comparison might sound unfair. The D300, featuring a 12 MP sensor was released in 2007, while the D7100, featuring a 24 MP sensor was released almost 6 years later in 2013. Six years. That is a long time in the digital world.
PREFACE
But let's start from the beginning. I am, or at least was most of the time very happy with my D300 for more than 5 years now. The camera travelled from the darkest basements to far asian cities and islands. And I never considered it an option to give away my cam as it never failed, never let me in the dark, never disappointed me. After having the D40 for a year before going to the D300 I was learning to appreciate the straight and clean layout of the control elements on the D300. It is truly straightforward. Shooting modes (P,M,S,A), ISO, WB, Exposure, Aperture and many more important settings can be very easily accessed without ever going into the menu. Hold the specific settings button while clicking the exposure dial thru the option value range. Release the button and it is set. Thats it. This straight UX approach was another strong reason I was soo happy with that camera. Also with the quality of the camera, especially its built quality – full metal (magnesium alloy) body - and the haptic feeling I was always more than satisfied over those years. For the image quality I was also quite pleased. Except, that sometimes I felt a bit more resolution for cropping could have been in those situations where you once again had to hurry snapping a shot without fine adjusting of the frame. On other occasions I was feeling like wanting more High ISO with less noise to shoot in the dark by hand. But as both of those requests seemed like only having one answer, namely going to full-frame (FX-Format) I dismissed the idea of upgrading . I was more than often on a holiday in a situation were I was tired to carry around my bulky and heavy bag. Going to full frame would not have meant to spend much more money on lenses but also to carry around an even bulkier and more heavier bag than the one I am sick of right now. So on holiday you will see me often just with the camera hanging from my shoulder, having the 35mm f/1.8 on and thats it. I highly appreciate the ability to move virtuously. Without moving, there is not much different scenes you are going to take in a day. And if you don't have a car with you or someone who is happy to carry your equipment (tripod, bag, umbrellas … what else do you need?) you really don’t feel like moving that much while taking all that material with you.
I remember also one of my close friends wanting me to convert to Canon, but this was also never an option for me. Not only having to switch a whole system of lenses, flashes and accessories, but I was and I am appreciating the nature of Nikon products in all ways a lot. Canon cameras often come out with newer features (Full-Frame-Sensors, Video, ...) or higher image quality more soon than Nikon ones. But to me they never felt that solid holding them in my hands as the Nikon cameras. I had Canon Cameras in my hand which cost more than double of the D300, but they always feel like cheap plastic to me. They never feel that solid as I would spend that much money on them. I also have some recent models of premium cars in my mind where manufacturers really failed in interior materials for +100k USD cars. I never would going to buy those – even I had the money - as they have cheap plastic buttons on the command panel, despite of being highly awarded by the so called independent specialized press.
COMMON FEATURES
OK. Lets first take a look, not at the differences of those both cameras. Let's take a look of what they have in common. Both are Nikon F-Mount DSLRs with a DX-Sensor (crop factor 1.3x). Both have the four basic important shooting modes – P, M, S, A. Both have an HDMI output on the left and a LCD on top. And the D7100 has at least a body which is partially made of magnesium alloy. Both have a 100 % viewfinder (0.94x). Both can shoot 14-bit NEF's, and both are featuring a 51-point AF sensor and an AF-motor, so non AF-S lenses will have AF function on both cams as well. Both can be equipped with a battery grip, and if you take a look at the menus you'll also find both cameras having extensive settings options which is almost the same huge feature list once more. And interestingly the D300s (the video enabled succeeder of the D300) is available at almost the same price right now as the D7100 is.
VIDEO
Let's just assume for a second that the only feature I am missing on my D300 is the video. Especially on holiday there is always something funny happening you want to take a video of, but often that is not in ideal light conditions. Smartphones just miss up taking videos in dim light and they don't have any optical zoom. So for taking just a little bit serious video it might be a good feature to have on the camera. But for buying a new camera with new money the step from to the D300s is just not far enough for me. It does not feature 1080p or 30fps video recording. And compared to the D300 there is just not more in the box finally than the video.
When spending money on a new camera you want to have more than just one feature. I never thought before that I am going to leave this super straight and solid prosumer Nikon line – not in favour for a less-pro product line. But as it turns out, the D7100 has much more image detail and quality offering in a package which is even lighter and more easy to carry than my old D300 and it is giving me 1080p video, while spending even a little less than for the D300s without missing all those detailed menu settings and major features. That's it. Said like this, it sounds very simple.
DIFFERENCES
Finally, I want to point out, which features you might be missing in case you are going for that same “upgrade” as me, or which features you might gain.
D300 havs, D7100 don't havs - flash sync plug (the old round one) - round 10 pin cable socket for remote cable shutter release and the older style GPS modules - display cover (protects your display from scratches) - straightforward controls - CF card slot (big cards, easy to grab, but be careful with the pins) - manual pop up flash (it never fires unless you release it first, no matter which program – that makes you look more smart than those people who are taking photos in the night of far objects (like skylines) or shooting thru windows with accidently firing the flash ;) - more solid body - bigger top LCD - bigger body more easy to grab (but also more heavy) - high shooting rate of up to 6/8 shots per second (8 only with battery grip or sw tweak***) - big buffer space (will enable you continues shooting of up to 18 RAWs (12-bit) at 6 FPS with fast cards) - LCD screen features more realistic tones and colors - in camera preview is of higher quality
D7100 havs, D300 don't havs - 24 MP sensor - Video recording - SD cards (hell are these small!) - DUAL SD card slots (second one can be set to JPG, backup or overflow) - IR sensor (for triggering the shutter) - many shooting scene modes (your friends who are not into photography might be able to take photos as well) - flash pop up is controlled by software now (to disable the flash, be sure to choose the right settings first) - shooting rate at 6 shots per second also for 14-bit NEFs (3 on the D300), but as of the - limited buffer space the burst rate drops dramatically (under 3 fps depending on your card) after 5 or 6 takes. - support for newer style GPS receivers and the Wifi-Adapter - LCD screen features adjustable backlight - HDMI-C socket (HDMI-A-Cables need an adapter)
That is not a comprehensive list, but the biggest differences I have encountered so far.
LOW PASS FILTER
Finally one last stop at the so called “low-pass-filter”. I have read on many sources on the web that there is “no significant difference” in picture detail by removing the low-pass-filter. I can confirm now while comparing both cameras that this is not true. The D7100 100% crops show definitely higher sharpness on the pixel level than the shots from my D300. Sure, that effect can only be observed while having a lens which is able to deliver that high detail. Just look at the photos I took here. Despite that DX prime lens' super low price tag, its able to deliver this. And there are probably more pricy prime lenses available which can even surpass this performance.
DISPLAY
The back display of both cams are different, but I cannot see any benefit in case of the D7100 LCDs in having another W-subpixel. If you place the cameras side by side you will easily notice that the colors and tones on the display of the D300 are much more natural. The D7100 has an adjustable backlight now and a little bit more true black. That is both a plus. But the photos on the D7100 seem oversharped on playback. But luckily this effects can only be observed on the screen. The photos itself on your memory card are of highest quality on both cams.
Image playback on the D7100 over HDMI shows black bars on left and right side - even if you zoom in into the photo - this is something nobody likes to see, especially as the D300 was able to do that better back then in 2007 already. But despite Nikon knowing from customer complains about this problem they never went to fix it and so this sticks out as a deliberate attempt to cancel this as a pro-camera and keep a distance to the higher priced 3-digit and one-digit product line.
VERDICT
As for the overall picture quality there is not much big difference between both cams. They perform almost equal in terms of dynamic range and white balance. But when you have the right lens mounted, the D7100 is the clear winner in resolution and detail. Also in Low-Light situations the D7100 tends to preserve more details than the D300.
I read on many sites on the web that people recommend the D300(s) as a more solid working body for professional photographers who take their 3000 images a week, but finally I believe that professional photographers can afford more recent and more pricey equipment as the D4 for example. So we are really not talking about professional photography here I guess.
I really liked the super solid body and the straightforward controls on the D300. But at the same time I don't want to miss that resolution and detail plus on the D7100 anymore. If you are used to the controls on any prosumer Nikon it might need a little time to get used to the layout of the controls on the D7100, but that is nothing to worry about if you have that time. Also the smaller image buffer on the D7100 might be something to consider, as the burst rate just drops much more early than on the D300. As a fashion show photographer this drop in burst rate, is unacceptable. The D300 image buffer allowed taking 3 times the number of RAW pictures slowing down, as long as you agree on the fact that 12 bit raw is enough and you wont need 14 bit.
Finally, I believe, that if you don't care about using CF or SD cards, and if you don't care about having a camera body fully made of metal alloy or half synthetics, the D7100 will give you much more than just more image detail. It will give you a more advanced focussing system, a lighter body, a second memory card slot and of course Video. And all that for a very decent price tag. So for me it is really an option while not going to FX (more weight, more pricey lenses) but still having major image detail improvement and a few relevant features.
And as my friend Ivo says. It is a new toy to play with as well for sure. :)
You're welcome to use these to help you learn how to ID those dolphins. All photos in the chart belong to me, please do not use without permission. Chart info and photos are subject to updates if animal status changes occur or I get better photos.
I've made these charts because I couldn't find any reliable information on how to expose a film for this "reverse xpro". From these results, I like something between -1 and 0 best - it may however be different with other films.
Based on the Snellen eye chart, this three-color, letterpressed poster is designed to keep your typographic eye keen on the details of everyone's favorite conjunction.
A corruption of the word "and per se and," ampersands are often a way that the type designer can show a little bit of flair and style in their design. For more information on the history of the ampersand, click here.
Hand letterpressed on bright white French 100lb. cover-weight "Sweet Tooth" Pop-Tone paper. Limited-edition of 110 prints, signed by the artist. Each print comes with an identification key that details the names and weights of all 61 ampersands.
11" x 23" (28 x 58 cm)
SOLD OUT!
Micronesian Stick chart
The Marshall Island seafarers developed and used this ancient aid to navigation. Sticks represent currents, swell patterns, and drift lines. Shells represent the East and West Marshall Islands.
1040808 300
12th February to 11th March 2011
This chart is intended to give myself and others an insight into what I watch, when I watch and how I watch television. Over a four week period I kept a record of all the programs I tuned into and scored each out of eight depending on how much attention I was paying at the time. I usually have the TV turned on while I work to provide background noise and I even go to sleep each night with it turned on, for these occasions I score my attention level with a low figure. If I actually make an effort to watch a program I will score it higher. As well as showing all this information in one graph I have split my viewing by week day and by channel to highlight patterns. I have also attempted to discover what channels I prefer by multiplying my attention level with the viewing time for each program. From this we can see that Channel 4 is my favourite, followed by BBC2 and BBC3. The visual style is inspired by an oscilloscope and the typefaces and colours are a reference to the old Teletext system.
For higher quality images visit:
You're welcome to use these to help you learn how to ID those dolphins. All photos in the chart belong to me, please do not use without permission. Chart info and photos are subject to updates if animal status changes occur or I get better photos.
You're welcome to use these to help you learn how to ID those dolphins. All photos in the chart belong to me, please do not use without permission.
One day I started filling a spreadsheet with all the languages I've used over the years (and with percentages of focus on each one) with the intention of creating a chart.
It got bigger than I expected. I guess never counted how many platforms I had actually used.
The original chart (created in LibreOffice) didn't look exactly good, so I decided to write custom code to plot the chart the exact way I wanted it to look like. This is the result. It was created with some messy JS code that rendered the data to a canvas object. I tweaked the colors a little bit and added the titles in Photoshop.
I think it's an interesting visualization of the platforms I've used. There are many different solutions to the problem, I think, but so far I'm pretty happy with this result.
Please view in the original size.
The source code can be found here. It was never meant to be released nor too flexible so it's a little bit too linear and hard-coded, but what the hell.
IF YOU WANT A COPY SEND ME AN ADDRESS TO SEND IT TO.
6 months of work on my goal of creating the best wepon chart to ever be seen by anybody's eyes. I present you my most awesome of works, 12,000 by 6,000 pixel work of Jason W. Herr
The original PNG is about 59.5 Mb, far too big for a flickr upload, that's me. Give me a limit and i create something triple said limit.
So, I had to go JPEG.....something i dislike because of the minor(sometimes massive) pixel scramblation.
If anyone would like the full-size picture, and has a way to recieve it, let me know.
I like to know exactly what I need to make before I make it, so as to minimize wasted time and ruined paper. This handy chart was created to show exactly what each shape looks like using the seven sizes of circles in the sizing ruler. The first is the largest hole using the longest strip at 24” then moves down the line from 12” to 6” and then 3” strips. The bottom-most right side has a single piece at 2”;. This took approximate six hours to complete.
You're welcome to use these to help you learn how to ID those dolphins. All photos in the chart belong to me, please do not use without permission. Chart info and photos are subject to updates if animal status changes occur or I get better photos.
Feel free to use these. But I ask NOT to repost them anywhere. These are to help everyone learn how to ID them, just share the link instead. Fair warning these can change or update when a dolphin moves or I get better photos. Please send questions about the animal or chart to me privately.
Diagram firstly shows how you can dis-associate the content types, from the distribution (web through to scarcity broadcast) from the four areas of displays you see it on. The cross media form is about how random combinations of platform, distribution, content types go to make up new types of services. More here personalizemedia.com - A range of charts created by Gary Hayes across games, social networks, cross-media, broadband services, virtual worlds. Used in various presentations already and all marked as creative commons - attribution, non-derivative, non-commercial.
Beachcombing anyone?
This gorgeous double sided 7" x 9" antique lithograph illustration of exotic shells of the world is a gem; absolutely perfect; flat and smooth... without dings or bumps. The paper is a lovely crisp quality too... finished with a soft and subtle sheen. There's a handy identification chart of which shell is which so that you can keep track of all of these spiffy specimens.
Quite amazing considering it's 92 years old.
Karolina Isela Kurkova is a Czech model, best known as a former Victoria's Secret Angel and an aspiring actress. She was born in Decin, Czech Republic on February 28, 1984. Karolina Kurkova's Love report shows her true love, love compatibility, Love matching, etc.
You're welcome to use these to help you learn how to ID those dolphins. All photos in the chart belong to me, please do not use without permission. Chart info and photos are subject to updates if animal status changes occur or I get better photos.
Who's mentioned the iPad most in headlines?
source: Google
sample search:
www.google.co.uk/search?num=50&hl=en&lr=&tbo=...
more information design
I posted a chart of the comparative sizes of Rollabind and Circa discs on diyplanner.com. This is a photo of actual discs from the two companies placed on the chart. You probably can't see it, but my printer was pretty true to size. Across the bottom is a row of discs representing all of the colors I have personally.
I initially created this Gocco "Color Chart" so I could have a handy pocket reference guide as to how all the Hi-Mesh inks would look like typically. There's 59 colors presented in total, including some discontinued inks (Slate Blue, Fluro Yellow, Light Grey, etc...) and I also made a "Color Matrix" transparency that overlays the "Color Chart" when lined up with the masthead below and labels the name of each of the inks presented.
While supplies last you can get one from my Esty site, just search under seller "Blue22".
You're welcome to use these to help you learn how to ID those dolphins. All photos in the chart belong to me and hannah.loves.dolphins (instagram.com/hannah.loves.dolphins), please do not use without permission. Chart info and photos are subject to updates if animal status changes occur or I get better photos.
Catalog #: 01_00083325
Title: Convair , 880
Corporation Name: Convair
Additional Information: USA
Designation: 880
Tags: Convair , 880
Repository: San Diego Air and Space Museum Archive
A sample from my Star Jasmine headband crochet pattern, showing how the charts are combined with text to walk you step-by-step through the pattern (available on Ravelry).
This is pattern I use to knit pullover from beige yarn cotton/wool for my sister. It is plastic and looks very nice.
Chart for knitting available on my web: www.free-knit-stitch.com/knit-stitch41-60/44.htm
"And as you can see, our sales rates have dropped after-"
BANG BANG
"NOBODY MOVE!"
Why are you doing this?"
Be quiet!
"Put your hands up guys! You're now under Two-Face's command!"
Two-Face moves from #76 City hall to secure neutral zone #80 Gotham Stock Market
Chart Leacon Open day 1992. Preserved S60000 "Hastings", owned by Hastings Diesels as part of 6S unit 1001 in ex-works condition. It was built at Eastleigh Works in 1957.
Organizational chart listing responsibilities and authorities was laid out July 12,1978. It was assembled from what fit together as shown in a photo of parts “laid out on sheet or muslin cloth.” The chart describes individual areas of activity listing the persons in charge of and those working with their implementation.
A description of Jonestown organization and fuller display from this chart and others can be found in Alternative Considerations of Jonestown and Peoples Temple under Research.
Photo released under the Freedom of Information Act and are in the public domain. Please credit The Jonestown Institute.
Statistics | Second Opinion
"It's not that you're not funny anymore...
...it's just that you're not as funny as what you once were... ...oh... don't cry..."
"Any good news then?"
"We're twin's."
--
This picture is part of My Other Minifigs, a Flickr set.
Image and Lame Ass Humour Copyright © 2010-present Joriel Jimenez
Please use with permission and full attribution