View allAll Photos Tagged artificial_intelligence
and blue and green and orange and purple... and a weird Nikon camera 😄
-----------
Can AI "photos" coexist with the "traditional" imagery???
Do you feel "betrayed" when (if) you found out a photo was an Artificial "photo"... are we getting used to being "lied" too?
Things are likely to become yet more complex as use of artificial intelligence by artists becomes more widespread, and as the machines get better at producing creative works, further blurring the distinction between artwork that is made by a human and that made by a computer.
contentauthenticity.org/blog/leica-launches-worlds-first-...
-----------------------
HIT THE 'L' KEY FOR A BETTER VIEW! Thanks for the favs and comments. Much Appreciated.
*********************
All of my photographs are under copyright ©. None of these photographs may be reproduced and/or used in any way without my permission. Just ask!
© VanveenJF Photography
Greetings all! These two (yes, I actually had enough parts to build two of them) were inspired by the Star Wars Vulture Droid, in that they can both patrol along the ground and in the sky (and beyond to space!). I originally built them for Andromeda's Gates. Funny story, I've actually had these built for almost 2 years! Lazy me took this long to finally take pictures of them :P
Enjoy!
sitting
**the night breath
holds itself—
a small ember
glowing in the hara.
thoughts drift like feathers,
soft, directionless;
the heart remembers
only love.
in the quiet light,
the koan unravels,
then gathers itself
like dawn.**
No artificial intelligence was used to create this image. All parts of this image come from normal photos that I have published on Flickr before.
Here is the moon: flic.kr/p/PaZeh3
This is the first eagle: flic.kr/p/2ocnk5m
The second eagle: flic.kr/p/2o6SvJ3
The clouds: flic.kr/p/2nrB54Q
These photos were combined in Photoshop.
The question "Who owns the moon?" has indeed some interesting aspects. The Outer Space Treaty, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in the year 1967, states that outer space, including the Moon, is not subject to national appropriation by any country. Like international waters, the moon is to be a "province for all humankind". The treaty, however, does not explicitly address private or corporate ownership. In theory, while no nation can claim the Moon, it's unclear if private companies or individuals could stake claims to land or resources. This omission has already been exploited commercially, through the controversial sale of land on the moon. A newer agreement led by NASA, the Artemis Accords, aims, among other things, to establish norms for lunar activity. It supports resource extraction for commercial use, but it does not establish sovereignty over the Moon. So there is an ongoing debate about the questions: Should anyone profit from the Moon? How can we ensure fair access for all countries?