View allAll Photos Tagged StudioTools
I love seeing 'art' in the ordinary. I saw this on the wall of the studio I visited a few days ago...a woodworking studio...monotone in nature, except for this shout of color on a wall. #cy365#captureyour365#wallart
This is my current sketch kit.
It includes: Moleskin watercolor sketchbook, Strathmore recycled sketchbook, small ruler, mechanical pencil (HB lead), Parker fountain pen with Noodler’s black ink, Pitt brush pens (black, warm gray), China pencil, 4B Graphitone water-soluble pencil, 2 Niji water brushes, kneaded eraser, sharpener, slide mount, Winsor-Newton travel watercolors, 2 collapsible brushes, 1 mini brush, pencil case. (I don’t usually bring both sketchbooks, usually one or the other.) It all fits easily in a travel purse along with my wallet, tissues, keys, cell phone, and glasses. So I’m good to go!
I was tagged, so let me have a talk: 16 things about me
1. Alfista- I like car, especialy sports car. I own an 2002type alfaromeo147, enjoying driving every weekend.
2.Photograh- Meet what I interested, I will take a photo to record it. as you can see, if I have time, grab a camera, whatever digital or film.
3.3D skill- Until few years before, I enjoyed 3D animation, so Maya, Rhinoceros, Alias StudioTools are not problem to me.(@ modeling)
4.Travel- I like travel. go to a place far from living in, that will bring me a reflash chance.
5.Drawing- when I was child, I alway drawing, line drawing or Chinese painting.but now, I just do sketching, for work. :p
6.Music- I like Jazz, R&B, and Pop. sometimes play classic music in my alfa.
7.Food- I enjoy Chinese, Japanese, Italia food, but I think France style will be a little difficult to me, too much rule that I can't remember @ all. sorry.
8.sports- Oh, that is weakpoint to me. don't ask me more about it, but you can tell me.
9.drink- favorite drink are: Cocacola, tea, coffee. but sweet beverage such as orange juice will keeping it away.
10.blood type- A, very sensitive and like to make a plan before do everything.
11.Worldwide- I have only experienced in Michigan, Newyork(USA), and Milano(Italy). Now I am in Japan.
12.Place wish to go: Angkorwat. Of course Eurape and New zealand also be good choice.
13.Ambitious in 2009: master developping film.
14.Wish in 2009: secret. LOL
15.Things now care: Economy. (use few money to do more works) LOL
16. Let me make a think...
It took some time to acquire all the pieces, as well as, the time to work on it. Special Thank You's to Ron Kinyon of Mesa, AZ for his willingness to share his great invention, and Paul Branch (Pine Bough Forge), of New Richmond, WI for compiling, and making the plans available for sale.
no more short tack welded ramp, as in earlier images. part of my impatience to get this part working led to me installing them. however, this works better, and how it was originally intended/designed.
after the trigger was remounted, the holder guides needed to be shimmed out (note the washers between the guide and hammer body), making the contact between the trigger-switch roller and the top edge and radius-ed corner just the right distance from one another.
middle plate is the foot pedal - top plate is the guard to prevent unintended actuation (OSHA mandate) the bottom plate is the base.
A load of dongles (with parallel cables and backplates) found dumped in a skip outside Kimberley Hall at Brunel University, Runnymede, in March 2006.
From vague memory of which computers in there had what software, I guess these were either for Alias/StudioTools (PC) or a Solaris version of AutoCAD, but I might be wrong. Did Sun SPARC workstations have this type of backplate?
So: here is thousands of pounds' worth of 'technology', originally designed expressly to enforce a business model, which I suppose it did fairly well, for a while. Those thousands of pounds (how much were educational licences for this software?) came from the taxpayer, and my tuition fees, and I suppose were amortised over a few thousand students.
But now, the technology is worthless. Entirely useless. Its function is not needed outside of the narrow context in which it was designed to operate.
How much design effort goes into creating products which are intended purely to enforce business models or political ideologies on their users: architectures of control?
More examples, discussion and analysis:
A load of dongles (with parallel cables and backplates) found dumped in a skip outside Kimberley Hall at Brunel University, Runnymede, in March 2006.
From vague memory of which computers in there had what software, I guess these were either for Alias/StudioTools (PC) or a Solaris version of AutoCAD, but I might be wrong. Did Sun SPARC workstations have this type of backplate?
So: here is thousands of pounds' worth of 'technology', originally designed expressly to enforce a business model, which I suppose it did fairly well, for a while. Those thousands of pounds (how much were educational licences for this software) came from the taxpayer, and my tuition fees, and I suppose were amortised over a few thousand students.
But now, the technology is worthless. Entirely useless. Its function is not needed outside of the narrow context in which it was designed to operate.
How much design effort goes into creating products which are intended purely to enforce business models or political ideologies on their users: architectures of control?
More examples, discussion and analysis:
A load of dongles (with parallel cables and backplates) found dumped in a skip outside Kimberley Hall at Brunel University, Runnymede, in March 2006.
From vague memory of which computers in there had what software, I guess these were either for Alias/StudioTools (PC) or a Solaris version of AutoCAD, but I might be wrong. Did Sun SPARC workstations have this type of backplate?
So: here is thousands of pounds' worth of 'technology', originally designed expressly to enforce a business model, which I suppose it did fairly well, for a while. Those thousands of pounds (how much were educational licences for this software?) came from the taxpayer, and my tuition fees, and I suppose were amortised over a few thousand students.
But now, the technology is worthless. Entirely useless. Its function is not needed outside of the narrow context in which it was designed to operate.
How much design effort goes into creating products which are intended purely to enforce business models or political ideologies on their users: architectures of control?
More examples, discussion and analysis:
A load of dongles (with parallel cables and backplates) found dumped in a skip outside Kimberley Hall at Brunel University, Runnymede, in March 2006.
From vague memory of which computers in there had what software, I guess these were either for Alias/StudioTools (PC) or a Solaris version of AutoCAD, but I might be wrong. Did Sun SPARC workstations have this type of backplate?
So: here is thousands of pounds' worth of 'technology', originally designed expressly to enforce a business model, which I suppose it did fairly well, for a while. Those thousands of pounds (how much were educational licences for this software) came from the taxpayer, and my tuition fees, and I suppose were amortised over a few thousand students.
But now, the technology is worthless. Entirely useless. Its function is not needed outside of the narrow context in which it was designed to operate.
How much design effort goes into creating products which are intended purely to enforce business models or political ideologies on their users: architectures of control?
More examples, discussion and analysis:
A load of dongles (with parallel cables and backplates) found dumped in a skip outside Kimberley Hall at Brunel University, Runnymede, in March 2006.
From vague memory of which computers in there had what software, I guess these were either for Alias/StudioTools (PC) or a Solaris version of AutoCAD, but I might be wrong. Did Sun SPARC workstations have this type of backplate?
So: here is thousands of pounds' worth of 'technology', originally designed expressly to enforce a business model, which I suppose it did fairly well, for a while. Those thousands of pounds (how much were educational licences for this software) came from the taxpayer, and my tuition fees, and I suppose were amortised over a few thousand students.
But now, the technology is worthless. Entirely useless. Its function is not needed outside of the narrow context in which it was designed to operate.
How much design effort goes into creating products which are intended purely to enforce business models or political ideologies on their users: architectures of control?
More examples, discussion and analysis:
A load of dongles (with parallel cables and backplates) found dumped in a skip outside Kimberley Hall at Brunel University, Runnymede, in March 2006.
From vague memory of which computers in there had what software, I guess these were either for Alias/StudioTools (PC) or a Solaris version of AutoCAD, but I might be wrong. Did Sun SPARC workstations have this type of backplate?
So: here is thousands of pounds' worth of 'technology', originally designed expressly to enforce a business model, which I suppose it did fairly well, for a while. Those thousands of pounds (how much were educational licences for this software) came from the taxpayer, and my tuition fees, and I suppose were amortised over a few thousand students.
But now, the technology is worthless. Entirely useless. Its function is not needed outside of the narrow context in which it was designed to operate.
How much design effort goes into creating products which are intended purely to enforce business models or political ideologies on their users: architectures of control?
More examples, discussion and analysis:
A load of dongles (with parallel cables and backplates) found dumped in a skip outside Kimberley Hall at Brunel University, Runnymede, in March 2006.
From vague memory of which computers in there had what software, I guess these were either for Alias/StudioTools (PC) or a Solaris version of AutoCAD, but I might be wrong. Did Sun SPARC workstations have this type of backplate?
So: here is thousands of pounds' worth of 'technology', originally designed expressly to enforce a business model, which I suppose it did fairly well, for a while. Those thousands of pounds (how much were educational licences for this software) came from the taxpayer, and my tuition fees, and I suppose were amortised over a few thousand students.
But now, the technology is worthless. Entirely useless. Its function is not needed outside of the narrow context in which it was designed to operate.
How much design effort goes into creating products which are intended purely to enforce business models or political ideologies on their users: architectures of control?
More examples, discussion and analysis:
A load of dongles (with parallel cables and backplates) found dumped in a skip outside Kimberley Hall at Brunel University, Runnymede, in March 2006.
From vague memory of which computers in there had what software, I guess these were either for Alias/StudioTools (PC) or a Solaris version of AutoCAD, but I might be wrong. Did Sun SPARC workstations have this type of backplate?
So: here is thousands of pounds' worth of 'technology', originally designed expressly to enforce a business model, which I suppose it did fairly well, for a while. Those thousands of pounds (how much were educational licences for this software) came from the taxpayer, and my tuition fees, and I suppose were amortised over a few thousand students.
But now, the technology is worthless. Entirely useless. Its function is not needed outside of the narrow context in which it was designed to operate.
How much design effort goes into creating products which are intended purely to enforce business models or political ideologies on their users: architectures of control?
More examples, discussion and analysis:
A load of dongles (with parallel cables and backplates) found dumped in a skip outside Kimberley Hall at Brunel University, Runnymede, in March 2006.
From vague memory of which computers in there had what software, I guess these were either for Alias/StudioTools (PC) or a Solaris version of AutoCAD, but I might be wrong. Did Sun SPARC workstations have this type of backplate?
So: here is thousands of pounds' worth of 'technology', originally designed expressly to enforce a business model, which I suppose it did fairly well, for a while. Those thousands of pounds (how much were educational licences for this software) came from the taxpayer, and my tuition fees, and I suppose were amortised over a few thousand students.
But now, the technology is worthless. Entirely useless. Its function is not needed outside of the narrow context in which it was designed to operate.
How much design effort goes into creating products which are intended purely to enforce business models or political ideologies on their users: architectures of control?
More examples, discussion and analysis:
Eight roulettes, moulette, burnisher, scraper, & stylus in holder; from the printmaking atelier of Rudolf in Zwijndrecht
A load of dongles (with parallel cables and backplates) found dumped in a skip outside Kimberley Hall at Brunel University, Runnymede, in March 2006.
From vague memory of which computers in there had what software, I guess these were either for Alias/StudioTools (PC) or a Solaris version of AutoCAD, but I might be wrong. Did Sun SPARC workstations have this type of backplate?
So: here is thousands of pounds' worth of 'technology', originally designed expressly to enforce a business model, which I suppose it did fairly well, for a while. Those thousands of pounds (how much were educational licences for this software) came from the taxpayer, and my tuition fees, and I suppose were amortised over a few thousand students.
But now, the technology is worthless. Entirely useless. Its function is not needed outside of the narrow context in which it was designed to operate.
How much design effort goes into creating products which are intended purely to enforce business models or political ideologies on their users: architectures of control?
More examples, discussion and analysis:
My taboret set up for both chalk pencils and watercolor/watercolor pencils. It's a nice table that I picked up for $5 at a huge store's going out of business sale. I love its fan shape.