View allAll Photos Tagged Stabilize
Darkday does a crazy pose for the cameras while doing this light block photo while deep inside the underground brick storm drain called Nugg's 'Ole
Rockets: Nuclear powered pulse rockets capable of rotating forward, backwards, and out to the sides.
Gyroscopes: Mounted on the sides and bottom of the Dragonfly, these can either be used to stabilize the fighter (for example, to counteract the force of the rocket's rotating) or to quickly spin the fighter to face a target.
Autocannon: The Dragonfly is equipped with a twin-linked pair of 20mm recoilless autocannons fed from helical magazines mounted below. ("Helix Magazine" redirects to here.)
Ordinance Chute: It's a chute, along with an ignition system and magnetic clamps to operate the mass torpedo.
Mass Torpedo: A rod of high density metal with a simple rocket system. The Mass torpedo is scored to break up on impact to impart as much force upon its target as possible- a concept similar to hollow-point bullets. The mass torpedo is also resistant to point defense, as a hit will usually break it into a number of high velocity projectiles rather than deflecting away.
Hangar Crane Hardpoint: The Dragonfly has a major hardpoint on the rear as well as a number of docking lugs along its undercarriage to allow it to be housed in a zero-g hangar. It could also be equipped with landing gear if appropriate for its mission.
Retrieval Hook: For catching a brake tether when docking.
Compression Harness: A pneumatic system that interlinks with the pilot's space suit, the harness is designed to reduce the physical strain of high-g maneuvers on the pilot. The air system can feed directly into the space suit to provide emergency atmosphere.
Reactor: A muon catalyzed fission reactor that is pre-charged before launch. The low start temperature and self limiting nature of the muon reaction proved to be ideal for small craft that could rely on a larger power source to provide catalyzing agents between missions.
Cockpit Canopy: The door in and out, of course, it also uses windows made of lab-grown sheets of aluminum crystals. The view ports are very small, and largely intended to be used in certain emergency scenarios, as the pilot's helmet has an internal monitor that provides the necessary visual inputs (as well as anti-nausea display lag during fast maneuvers). Similarly there is a redundant computer display in the front dashboard.
Part of a new lens test. First time trying an image stabilized lens on film. Seems to work as advertised, allowing you an extra 3-4 stops on still subjects. The out of focus rendering is good for a wide angle. Also pleasantly surprised on the performance of Kentmere Pan 100 film. It handles contrasty lighting conditions with grace. Considering it is so affordable, it will definitely be something I keep reaching for in the future.
A year after the Stabilization Force (SFOR) took command of the situation in Eastern Europe, Yugoslav-backed militiamen had reportedly been committing acts of ethnic cleansing in rural villages and townships predominantly in western Bulgaria. Given the pervasiveness of these accusations and the seriousness they imply, SFOR began working in conjunction with the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) to investigate potential grave sites.
Hence, we see here a mixed detachment of British and American mechanized forces with a pair of OSCE investigators and a young boy who claims he's seen a mass grave in a local grove. The OSCE would later report that some 200 people were executed and superficially buried in this small wood. After this account was published, it become an international spectacle in the West and managed to secure the public's enduring interest in trying to establish peace in Eastern Europe. Such a disinterested sentiment had been steadily waning as more and more global conflicts emerged and a state of war weariness shrouded many countries whose forces are deployed in one operation or another.
-No tripod, no image stabilization ...
This species of butterfly, Papilio machaon, is found primarily in Europe and Asia, but populations are becoming more scarce and confined. Other regions where Papilio machaon can be found include Canada, Alaska, and California. ("Russian Butterflies", 1997; Carter, 1992; Struttmann, 2004)
This image is not to be used, copied or edited without my written permission.
Follow Me: Website • Facebook • Google+ • Twitter • Youtube
Living my whole life in the US, when I think of the UN I always think of those guys in the blue helmets and their modern architecture styled headquarters in NYC. Outside of that, the only time you see the UN is really in the news or movies. Not something at the front of mind generally.
In the Congo, it's a different matter altogether. Established by UN Security Resolutions in 1999 and 2000, a peacekeeping force was deployed to Congo to monitor the peace process of the Second Congo War.
The United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, more easily referred to as MONUSCO has a very real, and noticeable presence in Goma and the surrounding environs. And it's not cheap. With over 19,000 personnel, MONUSCO's budget for the past year was $1.3 billion.
When driving through Goma, you will almost certainly run across several UN trucks. Or even one of their bases. While peace is better than war, it's amazing how different peace can look like around the world.
Blogged: www.aisleseatplease.com/blog/2016/6/22/the-un-presence-in...
In stabilized sand, Los Osos, California
This subspecies is listed in the CNPS Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants on list 1B.2 (rare, threatened, or endangered).
Rare photograph of an early Command Module ‘chop shop’, with two of the clean-cut thugs, posing as Honeywell Manufacturing engineers, preparing to fence the stripped components, which include both a Translation Hand Controller & Rotation Hand Controller, a Stabilization and Control System (SCS) panel, an Attitude Set & Gimbal Display panel & Velocity Change Indicator panel. Even a coveted Flight Director/Atitude Indicator (FDAI), with a street value of least $275. Fortunately, these were all Block I Command Module components, only to become obsolete and of no value within several years. What looks to be the installed Translation Hand Controller is visible through the side window, equipped with its jail cell door observation window sliding panel.
Note also the chart recorder/plotter, which looks to be placed/positioned atop some sort of shelving or similar structure in the background. Also, the elevated floodlights, angled downward & possibly attached to scaffolding. Interesting.
“RONALD CHISENHALL”. Really? Obviously, the perps got a little carried away with the alias. I suppose to not be too plain/dull/vanilla, like say Jones, Smith, Carpenter, etc.
Or, I suppose it could conceivably be associated with the following, from the February 6, 1964 entry of “The Apollo Spacecraft - A Chronology”/NASA SP-4009. In fact, it explains the components prominently “on display” in the photograph:
“Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Company reported it had developed an all-attitude display unit for the CM to monitor the guidance and navigation system and provide backup through the stabilization and control system. The Flight Director Attitude Indicator (or "eight-ball") would give enough information for all spacecraft attitude maneuvers during the entire mission to be executed manually, if necessary.
Honeywell News Release, "All-Attitude Display Produced By Honeywell For Apollo Spacecraft," February 6, 1964; Space Business Daily, February 24, 1964, p. 290.”
At:
www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/SP-4009/v2p2c.htm
Finally, as I’m sure at least one of you is wondering, what is this Command Module designated as? A ‘boilerplate’ I think.
"NASA 1970's Mars penetrator mission concept. The carrier spacecraft would launch the penetrator by rocket from a tube. An umbrella-like deployable fabric decelerator would be used to slow and stabilize the penetrator, which would leave an aftbody antenna at the surface."
The above, although associated with a black & white diagram of the image I've posted in the comments section, still aptly pertains to the striking view portrayed by Ken Hodges:
www.lpl.arizona.edu/~rlorenz/penetrators_asr.pdf
Credit: College of Science/Lunar & Planetary Laboratory/The University of Arizona website
AND!
“…A Mars Science Working Group (MSWG) chaired by Thomas Mutch was established by NASA to develop a science strategy for a future mission (Mars Science Working Group, 1977). It met four times in 1977. The plan assumed two Space Shuttle launches in December 1983 or January 1984, each carrying a spacecraft consisting of an orbiter, a lander with rover, and three penetrators, set to arrive at Mars in September or October 1984. The penetrators would be deployed just before arrival, but the rovers would wait in orbit until the dust storm season was over. Highly elliptical initial orbits would permit magnetospheric studies. After the rovers landed, the orbiters would enter circular orbits, one near-polar at 500 km altitude for global mapping and communication with the penetrators, the other 1000 km high with about a 30° inclination for rover communications. As the rovers might each deploy an instrument station with a seismometer, there could be ten simultaneously operating landed components.
As each orbiter neared the planet, it would deploy three penetrators which would fall on a circle around the centre of the planet’s disk as seen from the approach direction. After deployment the orbiters would be deflected off the approach path to enter orbit. The six penetrators, carrying seismometers and soil and atmospheric analysis equipment, would form a global array. Three would be placed about 500 km apart in an area likely to be seismically active, such as Tharsis. The other three would be spaced about 5000 km apart to give global coverage. Two additional and more sophisticated seismometers would be deployed by the rovers in areas partly shielded from the wind. Latitudes between 50° N and 87° S would be accessible, and the landing ellipses were 200-km-diameter circles. Slopes would have to be less than 45° at the impact point. Site selection was reported in a Penetrator Site Studies document preserved in Tim Mutch’s papers at Brown University. One potential array design was described (Table 36), along with four deployment options which include several additional sites (Table 37). Option 1 was the potential array described in Table 36. The penetrator sites in Table 37 were also described in Manning (1977), in which the site selection work was attributed to T. E. Bunch and Ronald Greeley.
The rover landing ellipses were roughly 50 by 80 km across. Five landing sites were studied using Viking data, in addition to the four sites previously considered by USGS for the Viking Rover (Figures 109 and 110). Only two sites were identified in the MSWG report, Capri and Candor (Table 38, Figures 111 and 112). The other sites were identified in Working Group documents among Tim Mutch’s papers in the archives at Brown University.
The rover landing ellipses in these documents were 65 by 40 km across. The polar orbiter would be able to deploy its rover from orbit at latitudes between 30° N and 50° N (this range could vary, depending on the launch date), whereas the low-inclination orbit could deliver a rover to latitudes between 20° S and 20° N.
Six rover landing sites were identified in a Rover Site Studies report prepared for the Working Group (Table 38a, Figure 111). Most derived from work done earlier for Viking or the Viking rover study, including proposals to land near Viking 1 and visit it or to explore the abandoned A-1 site with its complex geology. In a memorandum dated 9 May 1977, Hal Masursky followed up on discussions at a meeting of the Mars 1984 Mission Study Group held on 1 April. He asked Tim Mutch to request high-resolution stereoscopic Viking imaging coverage of four of these sites, using slightly different coordinates (Table 38b). These, he said, ‘were sites for which we have made traverse plans’. He added that ‘a backup smoother site near B-1’ at Cydonia had also been studied. Eventually the Capri and Candor sites were chosen, and detailed mission plans were prepared (Figure 109). Traverses near the Chryse sites were also prepared, including those in Figure 114.
The Capri site provided access to cratered uplands, crater ejecta and a fluvial channel. Candor was on the floor of the canyon system, with access to thick-layered deposits, canyon wall materials and, at the end of the extended mission, possibly the volcanic plateau surrounding the canyon. Alba had fractured volcanic plains and crater ejecta, but also small channels.
The Mars 1984 rovers had three traverse modes. Mode 1 was for detailed site investigations and involved only short, precise drives as needed for science operations. Mode 2, the ‘survey traverse mode’, would cover about 400 m per sol and could include some observations along the route. Mode 3, the ‘fast traverse mode’, could cover as much as 800 m per sol, including travel at night. The goal was to cover about 200 km during one Mars year and up to 200 km more in an extended mission in the second Mars year.
On 13 May 1977, Carl Pilcher, Hal Masursky and Ron Greeley suggested a variation on the role of penetrators in this mission. Two penetrators would be dropped in the lander target ellipse, carrying beacons to help guide the rover to a precision landing. After the landing they would operate with instruments on the lander itself as a local area seismic network.
The Mars 1984 orbiters would carry cameras, spectrometers for surface composition, infrared and microwave radiometers, a magnetometer, a plasma probe, a radar altimeter and communication relay equipment.
The relationship between Mars 1984 and other missions was considered by the Working Group. If Viking Lander 1 survived long enough, it might provide useful meteorological data for a Mars 1984 landing at Chryse, if that site was chosen. Conversely, Mars 1984 might be reconfigured to gather samples for collection by a sample return mission in about 1990.
Mars 1984 was not funded, probably in part because significant opposition to it arose in the science community. Jim Arnold and Mike Duke objected publicly that the final report of the Working Group did not reflect the group discussions, particularly in its assertions that the rovers were the only realistic option, that they were essential for future Mars Sample Return missions, and that simpler missions (orbiters, hard landers) were ‘a step backwards’. The report also suggested that only Mars rovers would command broad public interest, whereas missions such as Voyager, Jupiter Orbiter/Probe (Galileo) and the Lunar Polar Orbiter would not. This mention of Voyager refers to the outer planet spacecraft, not the earliest version of Viking (Table 2), and the suggestion that it would attract little public interest turned out to be the opposite of the truth. Elbert King (University of Houston) wrote to Mutch on 29 August 1977, stating emphatically that Mars 1984 ‘would only ensure a repeat of the very limited scientific success of Viking – providing mostly only costly clues and ambiguous answers to the important scientific questions’. He argued that only sample return was justified by the cost. This dismal assessment of Viking’s scientific worth stems from its failure to detect life, or to definitively rule it out, but overlooks its detailed characterization of surface and atmospheric composition, meteorology and landing site geology, not to mention the mission’s orbital data…”
WOW, I say again, WOW. The above phenomenal excerpt from “The International Atlas of Mars Exploration”, written by Philip J. Stooke, and most graciously made available by Cambridge Core/Cambridge University Press, at.
Wait one, maybe NOT so gracious.
Apparently, like everybody/place else, one is required to be registered or possibly possess an esteemed enough pedigree in order to be granted access...I apparently burned my one gratis peek:
www.cambridge.org/core/books/international-atlas-of-mars-...
We've come quite a way, eh? From dropping Jarts from orbit to flying a helicopter!
See also:
spaceflighthistory.blogspot.com/2017/08/prelude-to-mars-s...
spaceflighthistory.blogspot.com/2017/08/prelude-to-mars-s...
Both above credit: David S. F. Portree/"No Shortage of Dreams" blogspot
Last, but NOT least. This is a wonderful find, with a lot of fantastic imagery, to include this one. AND, it's still free, with no login/registration required...HOT-DAMN:
rpif.asu.edu/slides_mission_concepts/
Specifically:
rpif.asu.edu/slide_sets/future_mission_concepts/Mars_Pene...
Credit: Ronald Greeley Center for Planetary Studies/Arizona State University website
Kiln is being stabilized and reconstructed by community and government agency involvement
P8292725 Anx2 1600h Q90
Stabilized next to a tree, to prevent wind from blowing it off.
Lots of Gulls here, most fly away as I approached.
Another view of the canoe as I went for a walk…
When building at an angle I generally have just a few connection points and its rarely that stable, so I thought what has a decent amount of stability and lots of flexibility. Hero Factory parts.
Here is a timelapse I made to illustrate the Earth's rotation. It represents a full night of 8hours and 15 minutes.
I captured it in the Canary Islands during an astrophotography trip, on the island of La Palma, which truly lives up to its reputation as one of the best night skies in the world.
If you're interested, you can find more of my work on Instagram :
As you know, our planet Earth spins on its axis. This is what we call Earth's rotation. The best way to witness this phenomenon is to observe an astral object and watch it move across the sky. You could look at the Sun, but it is even more impressive to watch the stars, as you can see the entire sky shifting.
Astro timelapses are perfect for this. By speeding up the night sky, they make Earth’s motion more obvious. But to really emphasize the effect, you can stabilize the stars instead, making the Earth appear to move beneath the sky. That is exactly what I aimed to do here.
To achieve this, I used an equatorial mount (the Star Adventurer) to track the stars and keep them steady while the landscape rotates.
What can we see in this timelapse?
- Sea of clouds. A beautiful sea of clouds slowly forms and fills the lower part of the frame.
- Thick mist. A dense mist lingers just below my position, visible in the distance as it traps the light pollution.
- Strong airglow. Green clouds cover the sky — that is airglow. It is a faint natural glow emitted by the Earth's atmosphere, visible even in the absence of moonlight or direct sunlight. It is caused by chemical reactions between atmospheric particles at high altitudes and can appear as green, red, or bluish bands in the night sky.
- Headlights. Occasional flashes from rare cars taking the road about 200 meters away.
------
📷
Settings: 660 pictures at f/2.2 – 45 sec – ISO 2500
Canon 6D (astro-modded) – Skywatcher Star Adventurer – Sigma ART 14mm
------
P.S.: Did you notice the meteor at the beginning?
Azuwan (left) and Hisyam tried to stabilize a 800mm for a shot. Thanks to www.flickr.com/people/mzaidi/
"NASA 1970's Mars penetrator mission concept. The carrier spacecraft would launch the penetrator by rocket from a tube. An umbrella-like deployable fabric decelerator would be used to slow and stabilize the penetrator, which would leave an aftbody antenna at the surface."
The above, associated with a black & white diagram of the image, labeled as Fig. 7, at:
www.lpl.arizona.edu/~rlorenz/penetrators_asr.pdf
Credit: College of Science/Lunar & Planetary Laboratory/The University of Arizona website
AND!
“…A Mars Science Working Group (MSWG) chaired by Thomas Mutch was established by NASA to develop a science strategy for a future mission (Mars Science Working Group, 1977). It met four times in 1977. The plan assumed two Space Shuttle launches in December 1983 or January 1984, each carrying a spacecraft consisting of an orbiter, a lander with rover, and three penetrators, set to arrive at Mars in September or October 1984. The penetrators would be deployed just before arrival, but the rovers would wait in orbit until the dust storm season was over. Highly elliptical initial orbits would permit magnetospheric studies. After the rovers landed, the orbiters would enter circular orbits, one near-polar at 500 km altitude for global mapping and communication with the penetrators, the other 1000 km high with about a 30° inclination for rover communications. As the rovers might each deploy an instrument station with a seismometer, there could be ten simultaneously operating landed components.
As each orbiter neared the planet, it would deploy three penetrators which would fall on a circle around the centre of the planet’s disk as seen from the approach direction. After deployment the orbiters would be deflected off the approach path to enter orbit. The six penetrators, carrying seismometers and soil and atmospheric analysis equipment, would form a global array. Three would be placed about 500 km apart in an area likely to be seismically active, such as Tharsis. The other three would be spaced about 5000 km apart to give global coverage. Two additional and more sophisticated seismometers would be deployed by the rovers in areas partly shielded from the wind. Latitudes between 50° N and 87° S would be accessible, and the landing ellipses were 200-km-diameter circles. Slopes would have to be less than 45° at the impact point. Site selection was reported in a Penetrator Site Studies document preserved in Tim Mutch’s papers at Brown University. One potential array design was described (Table 36), along with four deployment options which include several additional sites (Table 37). Option 1 was the potential array described in Table 36. The penetrator sites in Table 37 were also described in Manning (1977), in which the site selection work was attributed to T. E. Bunch and Ronald Greeley.
The rover landing ellipses were roughly 50 by 80 km across. Five landing sites were studied using Viking data, in addition to the four sites previously considered by USGS for the Viking Rover (Figures 109 and 110). Only two sites were identified in the MSWG report, Capri and Candor (Table 38, Figures 111 and 112). The other sites were identified in Working Group documents among Tim Mutch’s papers in the archives at Brown University.
The rover landing ellipses in these documents were 65 by 40 km across. The polar orbiter would be able to deploy its rover from orbit at latitudes between 30° N and 50° N (this range could vary, depending on the launch date), whereas the low-inclination orbit could deliver a rover to latitudes between 20° S and 20° N.
Six rover landing sites were identified in a Rover Site Studies report prepared for the Working Group (Table 38a, Figure 111). Most derived from work done earlier for Viking or the Viking rover study, including proposals to land near Viking 1 and visit it or to explore the abandoned A-1 site with its complex geology. In a memorandum dated 9 May 1977, Hal Masursky followed up on discussions at a meeting of the Mars 1984 Mission Study Group held on 1 April. He asked Tim Mutch to request high-resolution stereoscopic Viking imaging coverage of four of these sites, using slightly different coordinates (Table 38b). These, he said, ‘were sites for which we have made traverse plans’. He added that ‘a backup smoother site near B-1’ at Cydonia had also been studied. Eventually the Capri and Candor sites were chosen, and detailed mission plans were prepared (Figure 109). Traverses near the Chryse sites were also prepared, including those in Figure 114.
The Capri site provided access to cratered uplands, crater ejecta and a fluvial channel. Candor was on the floor of the canyon system, with access to thick-layered deposits, canyon wall materials and, at the end of the extended mission, possibly the volcanic plateau surrounding the canyon. Alba had fractured volcanic plains and crater ejecta, but also small channels.
The Mars 1984 rovers had three traverse modes. Mode 1 was for detailed site investigations and involved only short, precise drives as needed for science operations. Mode 2, the ‘survey traverse mode’, would cover about 400 m per sol and could include some observations along the route. Mode 3, the ‘fast traverse mode’, could cover as much as 800 m per sol, including travel at night. The goal was to cover about 200 km during one Mars year and up to 200 km more in an extended mission in the second Mars year.
On 13 May 1977, Carl Pilcher, Hal Masursky and Ron Greeley suggested a variation on the role of penetrators in this mission. Two penetrators would be dropped in the lander target ellipse, carrying beacons to help guide the rover to a precision landing. After the landing they would operate with instruments on the lander itself as a local area seismic network.
The Mars 1984 orbiters would carry cameras, spectrometers for surface composition, infrared and microwave radiometers, a magnetometer, a plasma probe, a radar altimeter and communication relay equipment.
The relationship between Mars 1984 and other missions was considered by the Working Group. If Viking Lander 1 survived long enough, it might provide useful meteorological data for a Mars 1984 landing at Chryse, if that site was chosen. Conversely, Mars 1984 might be reconfigured to gather samples for collection by a sample return mission in about 1990.
Mars 1984 was not funded, probably in part because significant opposition to it arose in the science community. Jim Arnold and Mike Duke objected publicly that the final report of the Working Group did not reflect the group discussions, particularly in its assertions that the rovers were the only realistic option, that they were essential for future Mars Sample Return missions, and that simpler missions (orbiters, hard landers) were ‘a step backwards’. The report also suggested that only Mars rovers would command broad public interest, whereas missions such as Voyager, Jupiter Orbiter/Probe (Galileo) and the Lunar Polar Orbiter would not. This mention of Voyager refers to the outer planet spacecraft, not the earliest version of Viking (Table 2), and the suggestion that it would attract little public interest turned out to be the opposite of the truth. Elbert King (University of Houston) wrote to Mutch on 29 August 1977, stating emphatically that Mars 1984 ‘would only ensure a repeat of the very limited scientific success of Viking – providing mostly only costly clues and ambiguous answers to the important scientific questions’. He argued that only sample return was justified by the cost. This dismal assessment of Viking’s scientific worth stems from its failure to detect life, or to definitively rule it out, but overlooks its detailed characterization of surface and atmospheric composition, meteorology and landing site geology, not to mention the mission’s orbital data…”
WOW, I say again, WOW. The above phenomenal excerpt from “The International Atlas of Mars Exploration”, written by Philip J. Stooke, and most graciously made available by Cambridge Core/Cambridge University Press, at.
Wait one, maybe not so gracious. Apparently, like everybody/place else, one is required to be registered or possibly possess an esteemed enough pedigree in order to be granted access...I apparently burned my one gratis token on the above. Hmm, I wonder if the Indonesian document hosting website has it:
www.cambridge.org/core/books/international-atlas-of-mars-...
We've come quite a way, eh? From dropping Jarts from orbit to flying a helicopter!
Also:
spaceflighthistory.blogspot.com/2017/08/prelude-to-mars-s...
spaceflighthistory.blogspot.com/2017/08/prelude-to-mars-s...
Both above credit: David S. F. Portree/"No Shortage of Dreams" blogspot
A tower on the Ponemah Mill in Taftville, Connecticut. The great brick hulk, once a workplace for 1,600 textile laborers, is being renovated into housing. I thought it more photogenic in its deteriorated state, but it’s nice to see a 150-year-old landmark like this being saved.
Legs slightly parted my model is able to stand quite comfortably in her full leg braces. The 5 buckled knee pads are the most restrictive way to control the knee joint while wearing braces. These Braces are for sale. Made to measure braces and custom made bondage gear is also available. Contact me at my1970junk@msn.com.
@ f/4.0 1/8 sec ~38mm with image stabilization (handheld) | Kodak Portra 800 35mm film | Boulder, Colorado | Rocky Mountain Front Range | Western U.S.
Tonight's hazy moon shot with a point-and-shoot camera, no tripod and no image-stabilization by an old guy who is pleased.
test room at the maximum zoom. up to about 10 meters of the object. Both not have built-in lens stabilization.
*Ting ,ting*
"OS serum stabilized"
"What is this?"
"This is the OS serum chamber ,when the serum is combined with the DNA of Peter Parker it will form a super soldier like serum ,which will not just fix the problems with becoming a goblin but will also make you ten times stronger,faster but we don't know how it will turn out after merging with the DNA"said Otto Octavius standing next to a computer showing the stability of the gas in the chamber
"And as always blood of Peter Parker solves everything .Yet it is hard to get it."
The Gentleman walks into the room fast and unexpectedly.
"Yet there is one more way to get it.The Spider that byte Peter Parker remains dead in Parkers house.He didn't just give him the ability of Spider-powers as we expected but also taken some blood samples for us ,that was our original plan but we were not expecting that he will snap the spider and after keep it."
"So OSCORP knew that Peter Parker s Spider-man from the beginning !!!And this means that Spider-man was born in OSCORP!!!"said Harry with a amazed face .
"Indeed ,when we will steal the spider ,we will need to use the serum in a gas form not in an injection form .We have cloned so many serums yet not everyone can be merged with a blood sample,only one was strong enough to handle it "
takes off a bottle of serum.
"This one is not just a simple serum ,it is a one that can help your father return ,we keep it safe from everyone ,nobody must know that we are making experiments down the OSCORP ."
"Oh ,I am certain no one will mr.Fiers,AhaHAhaAHaHA"
Harry starts laughing like a maniac .
"We will win this time,no Spider freak will be able to stop us when we will have all his powers,AHAHAHhahHAHAaa!!!!"
"What is happening to him ,Mr.Fiers? "
"The serum is trying to resist the cues we have been giving him,inject him and after take him to his mansion,Otto "
"Yes Mr. Gentleman "