View allAll Photos Tagged Scrying
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
Goddess Lilith
Handmade Necklace and Rosary
Crescent Moon Goddess
Sumerian Goddess
First Wife of Adam
Protects Freedom of Women
Maligned as a Succubus
Spiritual Steampunk(tm) Necklace and Rosary
Scrying Mirror
Divination Pendulum
Special Edition Altar Set
With matching Shadow Box
Bangle made from found, corroded iron and iron components, sterling silver, black spinels and a natural quartz sphere.
When I made this, I was thinking about the pagan oracles who used wands, magic gemstones, scrying glasses and animal spirits!
Taken with Panasonic 20mm f1.7 lens on Panasonic GH2.
The Postcard
A postally unused postcard bearing no publisher's name.
Julius and Agnes Zancig
Note the sign 'Zancigs are Coming'.
Julius and Agnes Zancig were stage magicians and authors on occultism who performed a spectacularly successful two-person mentalism act during the late 19th. and early 20th. centuries.
Julius Zancig (1857–1929) – born Julius Jörgensen in Copenhagen, Denmark – and his wife Agnes Claussen Jörgensen (c.1850's −1916) – also born in Copenhagen, and known as Agnes Zancig – were the originators of the routine.
They had been childhood sweethearts in Denmark but grew apart, then met and fell in love again after both had emigrated to the United States. They were married in 1886.
The Zancigs managed to fool many spiritualists into believing they had genuine psychic powers. Julius later confessed that their mentalist acts were based on a complex code that they had perfected.
The Zancigs On Stage
Julius Zancig in his early career worked in iron smelting. He later became interested in mentalism, and with his wife Agnes, took his mind reading act to the stage in the 1880's. Julius and Agnes were close to one another in real life as well as on stage.
In 1907, Julius authored a book that supposedly illustrated the psychic relationship between husband and wife, entitled 'Two Minds With But a Single Thought.' Theirs was the most popular and famous version of the act, and was successful for 30 years.
As a performing duo, The Zancigs toured the world, visiting England, India, China, Japan, Australia, and South Africa. After several years of travel, they again settled in the United States.
During the early 1900's, Julius Zancig wrote articles for magazines. Both individually and as a pair, Agnes and Julius also wrote and published several books on such occult methods of divination and fortune telling as cartomancy, palmistry, and scrying with a crystal ball. On the title pages of these books, they styled themselves Professor Zancig and Madame Zancig.
After Agnes died in 1916, Julius married a Brooklyn schoolteacher named Ada, and she became his new partner in the mentalism act.
However, by 1917, Ada's dislike for public appearances had become so strong that Julius hired Paul Vučić to take her place, under the stage-name 'Henry.'
In 1917, Vučić, born in 1902 in Trieste to Serbian parents, decided to join the armed forces when the U.S. entered World War I, and was replaced by David Theodore Bamberg (1904–1974), the teenage son of the stage magician Theo 'Okito' Bamberg. David Bamberg performed the Zancigs' mind-reading act with Julius under the stage name 'Syko the Psychic'.
In 1919, the Bamberg family left for Europe and Ada rejoined the act.
Retirement and Private Work for Clients
During the 1920's, the Zancigs retired from touring. Julius was in his mid 60's, and the couple settled down to a quiet life as professional astrologers, tea leaf readers, crystal ball seers, and palmists, working for private clients. For a while they resided in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Julius wrote his last book, on crystal gazing, in 1926. They were living in Ocean Park, California (now Santa Monica, California), when Julius died in 1929, at the age of 72.
The Zancig Code
The Zancigs worked their stage act by means of an extremely elaborate and undetectable verbal code, which in later years became known as the Zancig Code. In 1921 a small (but by itself essentially useless) portion of the Zancigs' methodology was published by their friend and fellow mentalist-magician, Alexander the Crystal Seer.
In 1924, the psychical researcher Harry Price claimed that Julius had revealed to him his method of using the code. Price later commented:
'The Zancigs' performance took years
of study to perfect, and several hours
practice daily were needed to keep the
performers in good form.
I have the Zancigs' codes in my library,
and know the hard work that both Mr.
Julius Zancig and his wife put into their
act'.
The spiritualists Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and W. T. Stead were duped into believing that the Zancigs had genuine psychic powers. Both Doyle and Stead wrote that the Zancigs performed telepathy.
In 1924, Julius confessed that their mind reading act was a trick, and published the secret code and all the details of the trick method they had used under the title of 'Our Secrets!' in a London newspaper.
Writing in 1929, the year of Julius Zancig's death, the British magician Will Goldston described their methods:
'The pair worked with a very complicated
code. There was never any question of
thought transference in the act. By framing
his question in a certain manner, Julius was
able to convey to his wife exactly what sort
of object or design had been handed to him.
Long and continual practice had brought their
scheme to as near perfection as is humanly
possible.
On several occasions confederates were
placed in the audience, and at such times the
effects seemed nothing short of miraculous.
All their various tests were cunningly faked,
and their methods were so thorough that
detection was an absolute impossibility to
the layman'.
In the 1940's, Robert Nelson published a simple stage code which superficially resembled that of the Zancigs, but it did not permit the diversity of expression that they had achieved.
To this day, the Zancig Code, also known as 'Two Minds With But a Single Thought,' is considered by many professional mentalists to be the most dauntingly complex two-person communication system of its type ever devised.
Stan Laurel
When Stan Laurel was approached by fans who were starting the Laurel and Hardy fan club, he was asked to supply a motto for the club's logo and suggested a parody of the Zancigs' famous tag-line: 'Two Minds Without a Single Thought!'
The Influence of the Zancigs
Julius influenced many magicians. In 1924, Harry Houdini wrote:
'Mr. Jules Zancig is a magician, a member
of the Society of American Magicians of
which I have been the President for the
past seven years.
I believe he is one of the greatest second-
sight artists that magical history records.
In my researches for the past quarter of a
century I have failed to trace anyone his
superior. His system seems to be supreme.'
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
London Psychogeophysics Summit 2010
Dark Heart of Codeness .walk (pronounced as “dot-walk”)
Wilfried Houjebek wrote a geospatial algorithm in the “Brainfuck” programming language. After initialisation by a random coin toss the algorithm sends the user on a algorithmic tour. For historic reasons Wilfried chose the Royal Observatory as the starting point. From here our group was sent on a spiraling course towards Point Hill.
During the walk electromagnetic energies were recorded with an ELF receiver.
At Point Hill we planted undeveloped film sheets for thoughtographic experiments and hid measuring devices for logging high frequency energies. Also some intuitive drawings were made to record the atmosphere.
From there we went back to the center of London to interrogate the London Stone.
Sound recordings and map:
www.archive.org/details/Greenwich---Dark-Heart-Of-Codenes...
Thoughtography:
www.fotokatie.com/katier/?p=934
Intuitive drawings:
www.fotokatie.com/katier/?p=939
Psychogeophysics summit:
www.psychogeophysics.org/wiki/doku.php?id=summit:desc
Dark Heart of Codeness:
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
London Psychogeophysics Summit 2010
Dark Heart of Codeness .walk (pronounced as “dot-walk”)
Wilfried Houjebek wrote a geospatial algorithm in the “Brainfuck” programming language. After initialisation by a random coin toss the algorithm sends the user on a algorithmic tour. For historic reasons Wilfried chose the Royal Observatory as the starting point. From here our group was sent on a spiraling course towards Point Hill.
During the walk electromagnetic energies were recorded with an ELF receiver.
At Point Hill we planted undeveloped film sheets for thoughtographic experiments and hid measuring devices for logging high frequency energies. Also some intuitive drawings were made to record the atmosphere.
From there we went back to the center of London to interrogate the London Stone.
Sound recordings and map:
www.archive.org/details/Greenwich---Dark-Heart-Of-Codenes...
Thoughtography:
www.fotokatie.com/katier/?p=934
Intuitive drawings:
www.fotokatie.com/katier/?p=939
Psychogeophysics summit:
www.psychogeophysics.org/wiki/doku.php?id=summit:desc
Dark Heart of Codeness:
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
London Psychogeophysics Summit 2010
Dark Heart of Codeness .walk (pronounced as “dot-walk”)
Wilfried Houjebek wrote a geospatial algorithm in the “Brainfuck” programming language. After initialisation by a random coin toss the algorithm sends the user on a algorithmic tour. For historic reasons Wilfried chose the Royal Observatory as the starting point. From here our group was sent on a spiraling course towards Point Hill.
During the walk electromagnetic energies were recorded with an ELF receiver.
At Point Hill we planted undeveloped film sheets for thoughtographic experiments and hid measuring devices for logging high frequency energies. Also some intuitive drawings were made to record the atmosphere.
From there we went back to the center of London to interrogate the London Stone.
Sound recordings and map:
www.archive.org/details/Greenwich---Dark-Heart-Of-Codenes...
Thoughtography:
www.fotokatie.com/katier/?p=934
Intuitive drawings:
www.fotokatie.com/katier/?p=939
Psychogeophysics summit:
www.psychogeophysics.org/wiki/doku.php?id=summit:desc
Dark Heart of Codeness:
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
Lilith
Goddess Lilith
Crescent Moon Goddess
Rosary and Necklace
With Scrying Mirror/Divination
and Matching Shadow Box
Special Edition Altar Set
Spiritual Steampunk
Ancient Sumerian Goddess
Legendary First Wife of Adam
Protects Freedom and Independence of Women
Vintage Brass, Copper
Script on Metal
Freshwater Pearls
Golden Tiger's Eye
Close-up of the right side. Books include: "The Spell of the Sensuous" by David Abram, "Applied Magic" by Dion Fortune, "Practical Solitary Magic" by Nancy B. Watson, "Real Magic" by Isaac Bonewits, "Taking Up the Runes" by Diane L. Paxson, "Exploring Scrying" by Ambrose Hawk, "Modern Magick" by Donald M. Kraig, "Herbal Rituals" by Judith Berger, and "Magical Aromatherapy" and "Encyclopedia of Magical Herbs" both by Scott Cunningham. Plus, a bag of mixed herbs and a small statue of a black cat.
London Psychogeophysics Summit 2010
Dark Heart of Codeness .walk (pronounced as “dot-walk”)
Wilfried Houjebek wrote a geospatial algorithm in the “Brainfuck” programming language. After initialisation by a random coin toss the algorithm sends the user on a algorithmic tour. For historic reasons Wilfried chose the Royal Observatory as the starting point. From here our group was sent on a spiraling course towards Point Hill.
During the walk electromagnetic energies were recorded with an ELF receiver.
At Point Hill we planted undeveloped film sheets for thoughtographic experiments and hid measuring devices for logging high frequency energies. Also some intuitive drawings were made to record the atmosphere.
From there we went back to the center of London to interrogate the London Stone.
Sound recordings and map:
www.archive.org/details/Greenwich---Dark-Heart-Of-Codenes...
Thoughtography:
www.fotokatie.com/katier/?p=934
Intuitive drawings:
www.fotokatie.com/katier/?p=939
Psychogeophysics summit:
www.psychogeophysics.org/wiki/doku.php?id=summit:desc
Dark Heart of Codeness:
London Psychogeophysics Summit 2010
Dark Heart of Codeness .walk (pronounced as “dot-walk”)
Wilfried Houjebek wrote a geospatial algorithm in the “Brainfuck” programming language. After initialisation by a random coin toss the algorithm sends the user on a algorithmic tour. For historic reasons Wilfried chose the Royal Observatory as the starting point. From here our group was sent on a spiraling course towards Point Hill.
During the walk electromagnetic energies were recorded with an ELF receiver.
At Point Hill we planted undeveloped film sheets for thoughtographic experiments and hid measuring devices for logging high frequency energies. Also some intuitive drawings were made to record the atmosphere.
From there we went back to the center of London to interrogate the London Stone.
Sound recordings and map:
www.archive.org/details/Greenwich---Dark-Heart-Of-Codenes...
Thoughtography:
www.fotokatie.com/katier/?p=934
Intuitive drawings:
www.fotokatie.com/katier/?p=939
Psychogeophysics summit:
www.psychogeophysics.org/wiki/doku.php?id=summit:desc
Dark Heart of Codeness:
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
This mini consists of: a book opened in "Monkshood" chapter (also know as aconitum) one of Hekate's sacred plants; there's a jar containing petals from this plant and more can be seen scattered around; some candles, scrolls, package and a letter, a tiara with 3 moons, a scrying mirror (the ones for this purpose are black), at the back a pic of a lady performing this activity (the painting belongs to Waterhouse, a pre raphaelistic painter and one of my favs), a jar with somehting unknown, there's a pic showing a crossroad and a list with "Hekate's supper" (cheese, garlic, almonds, eggs and cakes for the dead), and at last; a wand i made using a tree branch from my tree with moon ornaments and the crystal is a diamond leftover (the very far away outside of this precious stone).
It took 3 days to be completed. It's entirely handmade, the plant showed into the mini book has been handpainted by me.
Diviner predicting the future with a crystal ball. Learn more about Crystal Balls here - www.psychicbase.com/crystal-balls/
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
So who is this underneath the most spectacular of handmade Wizards clothes you will ever see? Every part was handmade and he brought to all who attended our ceremony,our two engagement rings to be Blessed by everyone there.But who is he?
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
On the subject of running shoes, is there an ME associated with the brand REEBOK?
Looking through Reddit, there appears to be a myriad of people claiming to remember variations on the spelling of REEBOK... Some remember REBOK, and appear to be genuinely surprised to discover the addition of an "E". Still others claim to remember, REEBOCK, some REEBOX, and improbably REEBOOK and REBOOK get mentioned too! Their numbers are smaller than conventional MEs, so it's easier for skeptics to dismiss these memories, but is there any weight to these claims?
Conducting some research, I was surprised at the amount of residue in the various streams. Each query calls up thousands of matches that start to paint a persistent image... is this all spelling errors? Perhaps in some cases, but many articles and adverts repeat words, so it's obvious something like REEBOCK is being used intentionally.
Allow me to indulge in some speculative scrying. Many wonder how many different timelines are interacting with our own. The more I research the phenomenon, the more soupy it feels. It's almost as though there are onion layers of "homily dimensions"; with spelling variations revolving around similar phonetics. I wonder if they get increasingly distorted the further they move away from the original source, like ripples in a pond.
Presenting just a handful of images I stumbled across in the newspaper archives, but for the curious of mind, it does provide some food for thought!
Lilith
Sumerian Goddess
Protective of Women
Goddess of Self-Empowerment
Enchanted Rosary, Necklace, Scrying Mirror on reverse side, Matching Shadow Box
Crescent Moon
Victorian Filigree
Flat and Braided Ceramic
Crystals
Freshwater Pearls
Golden Tiger's Eye
Script on Metal
Vintage Brass Setting
Spell Bound Gems(tm)
Spiritual Steampunk(tm) Collection