View allAll Photos Tagged Positivity
Mt.Yubari, Yubari, Hokkaido.
Canon AV-1, Sigma macro 90mm F2.8, positive ISO 100, developed as described before ( www.flickr.com/photos/threepinner/9397690534/ ), scanned with Nikon Coolscan 4000 ED at 4000DPI, approximately equivalent to the size of 19 Megapixels.
a series I did for my Problem Solving Final that deals with my daily effort to stay positive about my body.
RED SCALE
PENTAX LX - FA43mm - FUJI SUPERIA 100 EXPIRED 2002
DISPARADO A ISO 50, FORZADO UN PASO EL REVELADO.
It was a trip to Sun-Moon Lake,Nantou,Taiwan.Dad took the picture in the early 1970s,positive film,I reshoot with Nikon D3s.
Still pursuing SLOW PHOTOGRAPHY with my 4x5 cameras whenever I can... This is a test shot of Leciel, a wonderful model I had the pleasure to work with last week. Shot on Fuji 100c instant film with an 80 years old camera and lens, I intentionally slightly underexposed the POSITIVE (on the left) in order to get my intended grungy look in the NEGATIVE by hand washing it in bleach and other secret and highly poisonous concoctions....
Accidental Direct Positive from Kodak 2383. I shot some 2383 and tried to push it to ISO 12 (from 1.5). Shot it as 12 and developed it as B&W hoping that might do the trick. I push processed in H&W Control 1:14, since that is a very active developer. 16 minutes development (instead of 12) 100 degrees F instead of 68 F and continuous agitation. stopped and fixed at 100F as well. Fixed with Ilford hypam 1:4. Strangely some of the frames developed completely positive, and some were positive foreground with negative whites and lights. You can see here some of the mix. Not a lot of depth or contrast which could just be the underexposure (3 stops). Took me a few minutes to realize what was going on,. Definitely worth experimenting some more. Again these are direct positive, there was no reversal here and no partial editing. You can see here where I flipped / inverted entire pictures which was cool and weird no matter how you did it. I think what happened is a combination of active developer, the very thin emulsion which is not very light sensitive - relatively, and then the underexposure. Anyway have fun with these and try it yourself. I want to do this with 16mm movie and see what comes of it.
Pentax MZ3 | Pentax FA 43mm F1.9 limited | Fuji Superia 400
Scanned with Pentax K1 FA Macro 50mm | Essential Film Holder
20 acres, wooden and open pull-thru sites - Pool, Horseback riding, Bingo, Large Game room, Store, Laundry, nearby fishing, Golf, Winery - I-40 Exit 13 - North on U.S. 71 2 miles - mail. Rt. 3, Box 203-A
from ift.tt/1WZmn8r
A few days ago, I decided to give in to my curiosity about the lab results my super-awesome1 rheumatologist ordered when I went in for my sweat hiatus.2 The checkout slip had my login details for that office’s EMR on it, so I went to check it out.
Aside from finding out how truly abysmal the office’s record keeping skills are—my medicine, surgery, & allergy lists were inaccurate, he claimed he prescribed my Effexor, he was consulting with a doctor I haven’t seen in 6-7 years about my case, he had 4 visits total listed, even though there have been at least 12-16 visits, old lab reports were missing, old prescription data from drugs he’d prescribed was missing—I found out that he had a “plan of care” that revolved around telling me how fat I am3 and how I need to start exercising.4 I also found out that he thinks I’ve been on my Flexeril too long. I’m fairly certain that I pointed that little issue out about two or three years ago when I asked him to try something else because the Flexeril had become ineffective. But hey, it’s just my body, what do I know? I would claim that I felt incredulous,5 but I can’t fake my disbelief over his ridiculous & somewhat terrifying antics. Seven years of this same old bullshit just wears a girl out.6
But this isn’t supposed to be about his incompetence. This is supposed to be about lab results. Tell me what your first reaction would be to these results.
Notice anything odd about them?
There are no units of measure listed on the ANA test. And the way the “normal range” section is phrased sounds like anything above 120 or below 100 is bad. Think again.
I had to search for an explanation of these results harder than a Disney prince has to search a magical forest for a barely legal future wife to take home to his dysfunctional family.
And I found one.
Sort of.
Apparently, the range should read like this:
Negative: Below 100
Equivocal: 100-120
Positive: Above 120
So I tested positive for the ANA Qualitative Test, the SSA (Ro) antibodies test, and the Scl-70 test. That could indicate: Lupus, Sjögren’s, Scleroderma, MCTD, UCTD, etc. It could also be a fluke because truly healthy people can have positive readings on these tests, and people diagnosed with them can have negative ones. So I’m not worrying too much about that.
I’m a bit more concerned with my CBC because my platelet volume was almost too low, while my platelet count was close to the upper limit. Combine that with an increase in red blood cells and you’ve got a warning that the anemia isn’t far from striking. I guess that explains why I’ve felt more down & out, and why my body has gone into the “I’m dying” feeling that accompanies the anemia. I’m going to get the rheumatologist to forward that part of the labs to my hematologist, to make sure waiting to the end of the year for my tests + infusions is still safe.
I really dread the infusions, but they’re part of my life now. I will just have to deal.
at forgetting ↩
The thing that’s potentially fatal, but that my rheumatologist is all blasé about. Who needs sweaty pits and tits in 90-100°F humid, summertime-in-Alabama weather? Oh, right, everyone. ↩
16 points of a 23 point list ↩
Because telling a doctor that you’re concerned that a 45-minute, 1.8 mile walk in 85°F+ didn’t cause you to sweat and that the overheating was limiting your exercise choices doesn’t get the message across that you’re actually exercising. ↩
Not a Disney movie title adjective, though it could be. ↩
A girl has no name. ↩
Related Posts:
Call Me Janet the Divine. On Second Thought, Don’t. May 21, 2016
Definitely More Stable Than Donald Trump January 25, 2016
Bad Blood (Vessels) June 22, 2015
Can’t Sweat Any of the Stuff April 27, 2016
Anaphylaxis and You April 17, 2015
We can see this picture from two angles..
First one is Negative angle.. which says :
The most difficult thing in human life is to have a burning candle in the depths of his hearts.
Second one is Positive angle.. which says :
What a wonderful to have a Candle That lights our hearts
The question here is which one do you choose ?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
هذه الصورة بامكاننا ان نراها من زاويتين
الاولى زاويه سلبية و التي تقول
-----------------------------
أصعب شيء على المرء ان تكون هنالك شمعه تحترق في أعماق قلبه
الزاوية الثانية و هي الزاويه الايجابيه
والتي تقول
-------------------------------------
ما اجمل ان تكون هنالك شمعة في أعماق الانسان تنير قلبة
ويتم التساؤل هنا من اي زاية شاهدت هذه الصورة ؟
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Camera : Canon 400D
Lens : Canon 100mm , F2.8
Flash : did not fire
Iso speed : 400
exposure Time : 1/50 Sec
exposure program : manual
Date picture taken : 30/09/2008 02:23 Am
© All rights are reserved
“A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.”
- Herm Albright
© LKG Photography
I love shooting new, unusual film stocks. One of the more unusual stocks that I hand-roll for our Film Photography Project on-line store is a scientific lab film by Svema. We call this low contrast, low ISO film "BW Super Positive" because the film produces a black and white positive when processed using normal BW chemistry.
Blog - filmphotographyproject.com/content/features/2015/12/shoot...
Accidental Direct Positive from Kodak 2383. I shot some 2383 and tried to push it to ISO 12 (from 1.5). Shot it as 12 and developed it as B&W hoping that might do the trick. I push processed in H&W Control 1:14, since that is a very active developer. 16 minutes development (instead of 12) 100 degrees F instead of 68 F and continuous agitation. stopped and fixed at 100F as well. Fixed with Ilford hypam 1:4. Strangely some of the frames developed completely positive, and some were positive foreground with negative whites and lights. You can see here some of the mix. Not a lot of depth or contrast which could just be the underexposure (3 stops). Took me a few minutes to realize what was going on,. Definitely worth experimenting some more. Again these are direct positive, there was no reversal here and no partial editing. You can see here where I flipped / inverted entire pictures which was cool and weird no matter how you did it. I think what happened is a combination of active developer, the very thin emulsion which is not very light sensitive - relatively, and then the underexposure. Anyway have fun with these and try it yourself. I want to do this with 16mm movie and see what comes of it.
Accidental Direct Positive from Kodak 2383. I shot some 2383 and tried to push it to ISO 12 (from 1.5). Shot it as 12 and developed it as B&W hoping that might do the trick. I push processed in H&W Control 1:14, since that is a very active developer. 16 minutes development (instead of 12) 100 degrees F instead of 68 F and continuous agitation. stopped and fixed at 100F as well. Fixed with Ilford hypam 1:4. Strangely some of the frames developed completely positive, and some were positive foreground with negative whites and lights. You can see here some of the mix. Not a lot of depth or contrast which could just be the underexposure (3 stops). Took me a few minutes to realize what was going on,. Definitely worth experimenting some more. Again these are direct positive, there was no reversal here and no partial editing. You can see here where I flipped / inverted entire pictures which was cool and weird no matter how you did it. I think what happened is a combination of active developer, the very thin emulsion which is not very light sensitive - relatively, and then the underexposure. Anyway have fun with these and try it yourself. I want to do this with 16mm movie and see what comes of it.
"Everything around us is made up of energy. To attract positive things in your life, start by giving off positive energy."
52 week challange. Week 9. Theme: Positive
Strobist info:
1 x 430EXii boundced off the ceiling to the wall behind/top of subject. Manual 1/1 fired with wireless trigger.
1 x 430EXii front of subject straight on. Manual 1/64 fired with wireless trigger
Canon AE-1 Program
Canon Lens FD 1:1.8 50mm
Kodak Gold 200
Scanned with Plustek 8100
Developed as Positive in E6/C41
1. FD [homebrew] (E6) - 8'15'' (Push +1)
2. Second Exposure to light
3. Second Developer (C41 CD) 8 min (exhausted, fresh would be 6)
4. Bleach
5. Fix
6. Stab
Lake Constance, South Germany
Scouting for a new location to capture some outstandingly smooth light trails, we ended up next to the wharf where all ferries depart from Meersburg towards Staad. This time film is replaced by the awesome properties of Harman's fibre-based DPP with its unique tonal response.
Ilford: I wish I'll never hear the news of this stock being discontinued.
10 minutes exposure, f5.6 @ ISO 1,5
Camera: Linhof Kardan re
Lens: Fujinon-W f5,6 / 105mm
Lightmeter: (guesstimate)
Tripod: Berlebach Report 172
Paper: Harman Direct Positive Paper FB Glossy
Developer: Rodinal R/09 1+50 one-shot (inversion development, 13min @ 20ºC)
Stop Bath: Ilfostop
Fixer: Ilford Rapid Fixer