View allAll Photos Tagged Monogram
Some things do not make sense to a nine year old. The presence of a cannon in the courthouse yard was not one of them. None of us doubted the appropriateness of having a cannon handy to defend the most important government building of our limited world. We knew well that the paddy wagon sometimes transported criminals from the jail, one half of a block further south on Washington Ave., to their day of judgment in the courtrooms, on the second floor, directly above the marriage license department, in the old part of the courthouse. But we were not so naive as to believe that anyone needed military hardware to defend against mere criminals. Instead, we all just assumed that the cannon was part of the same grand defense strategy that had required all of us as third graders to duck under our desk and cover our heads when the air-raid siren went off every Monday at 1:00 PM sharp. And we heartily endorse the more sophisticated strategy of abandoning our class rooms completely for the far greater safety of the corridor, where we would kneel down on the floor with our heads up against the lockers and pray to the Blessed Mary. We fully approved when this improved strategy, was introduced midway through the fourth grade. We were grateful that the nuns were so farsighted as to see how more likely to survive nuclear annihilation we would be in the hallway rather than under our desk in the classroom where we might get cut by broken glass. We could readily see that the hallway was the nuclear high ground as it were, even before we factored in the added advantage of praying on ones knees compared to just crouching under the desks. Of course we would have endorsed any plan that brought even the slightest release from the classroom. To this day I am still not convinced that there weren't some of us who would have preferred the full thermo nuclear blast to returning to the blessings of a Catholic education at 1:05. From our perspective, it just made good sense to keep a cannon in the courthouse lawn.
What we could never figure out is, why a great nation like the United States of America, a nation so awesome that it has had single handedly defeated Germany, Japan, Italy and Russia and a host of other ner-do-wells in World War II, would ever need to resort to the embarrassment of assigning used cannons to defend one of the most important building in the county. It just did not seem reasonable, but the evidence was undeniable. We shinnied over and slid down the proof every afternoon. We were depending on some old king's cannon. We were positive of that much. One merely had to look at the crown and fancy lettering so artfully engraved in the base of that hulking bronze weapon to know that this was not a regular democratic cannon. It almost seemed un-American to rely on a weapon with so many curly-q's. And the letter were so fancy that even a fully certified member of the Palmer Method Good Penmanship Club could not decipher the monogram with any real degree of certainty. The need for a royal cannon just did not make sense to a fourth grader, but it was only one of a trinity of mysteries that surrounded this old cannon. That first puzzle was hardly fit to hold the coat of either of the two others, which unlike the mystery of King Charles III initials, remained unsolved well past the fifth grade. While we were curious about our need for used weaponry, that could not hold our curiosity nearly as well as the next mystery.
My first set of Monograms I have ever made. They are for a swap. I hope my secret pal likes them! What do you think? Have you ever made monograms or used them in any of your scrapbooking layouts? Thanks for looking! :)
“SLINGSHOT” DRAGSTER
Monogram – PC49
1/22 Scale – 1959
Art by Tom Kowal
This and Monogram’s “Long John” were two of the earliest dragster kits made.
Made for a really delightful couple. The bride was such a beauty inside and out. It features their monogram and classical motifs.
MIDGET RACER
Monogram – PC1
1/20 Scale – 1956
Monogram Models started producing wooden model kits late in 1945. Injection molded plastic detail pieces were added to later kits. The first all plastic Monogram kit was this Midget Racer introduced in 1954. The packaging shown is from 1956.
When i first saw this monogram i actually didnt really like her,but since i had a opportunity to get her through winning in the Wclub lottery i thought why not,and after seeing her in person and looking at her she is reallly starting to grow on me,and also that dress is just awesome lol and she also has the coolest shoes!!! which i havent photographed lol
Seen at Blenheim Palace, Oxfordshire. The coronet of an earl (with strawberry leaves) crowns the monogram and the gates date to c.1890.
When I started collecting back at the end of 2010 Monograms already gained some popularity and attracted my attention. Beside NuFace line which is more youthful and trendy, Monograms were third IT line which I collected and represented more classic and elegant part of what I like. However, when this line discontinued I sold almost all of my Monos and my attention shifted to FR line. Now and then I really miss this line and so I decided to get one.
Makeup/Hairstyle: Magnetism has second screening released for this line. I really do think this screening is the best as I had at least one doll per screening. Her sideway gaze is so seductive and gold eyeshadow make her look more alive. Her gorgeous coral lips have small details in the corner and look lush in person. Most redheads have those orangy eyebrows, which I personally hate, others have dark brown eyebrows which look too harsh in person, but this one has very nice mahagany eyebrows. Her emerald eyes are everything. Paint quality is superb, there is not a single error in intensity or placement! Can you see that I am totally in love with this one? The rooting on this doll reminds me on FR2 ladies, indeed this one has been produced about that time. She has just enough hair to make any hairstyle you want, yet she looks very realistic. 10+/10
Outfit/Accessories: It seems that most collectors didn't like this outfit when she was released, I have seen it on sale so many times. In person, I am floored! The details on the gown are amazing, the material feels very luxe. The dress closes with zipper, something I prefer and miss these days. The belt is lined, yes, you read it right, it is lined and looks so nice in person. The bow sometimes gets in the way, but I guess that depends if you are a bow person :) On the seam at the top of the dress there is a thin clear band sewn to keep the material in place and not to get stretched (or flash control :) Now, how cool is that! You can see on the photo above that she comes with a long black-purple wrap. It is fully lined and you can use it to display her differently. Jewelry consists of only earrings and bracelet. But OMG look at those lovely earrings, look at that bling. We got that bracelet a few times later, but it might be my favorite bracelet model ever! 10+/10
Production/Quality Issues: This doll is from a time when quality issues were rather rare. She was released almost 10 years ago and you can see how her jewelry looks like brand new. 10/10
Overall, I really can not think of a reason why this doll isn't more popular. She is a perfection! I think she will be my 10-year anniversary gift. 10+/10
I helped organize a club where a group of us cookie decorators make birthday cookies for each other. I made these for the ladies who had birthdays in March. I used little heart sprinkles to fashion the flowers.
teachers' gifts. The tall one with the brown straw is for the teacher; the smaller one with the clear straw is for the teacher's assistant. The monogram repeats on the other side; I put white napkins in the cups just for the photos (they wouldn't photograph well otherwise).
Used brown vinyl (cup on left is from Copco, cup on right is from Old Navy). These can go in the dishwasher and the vinyl will not come off. Hooray for Silhouette machines!
blogged about at insidethefashiondollstudio.com/2011/09/22/she-is-passionate/
available at www.windycitydolls.com/frmonogram.htm
A couple of weeks ago I was looking for something in my stash and suddenly held a bag in my hands filled with my collection of vintage monograms from old linen towels. On the spur of the moment I decided to turn them into a quilt and just started cutting. I really love these tokens of olden days. Every block has a different monogram as centerpiece and I handstitched around each one to emphasize them.
I made this monogram pillowcase for my master bedroom --- now I just have to make the matching one :)
Ptolemaic Kingdom of Egypt, Cleopatra VII AR Tetradrachm. Askalon, Year 64 Era of Askalon = 41/40 BC. Diademed bust of Cleopatra right, wearing necklace, hair plaited in rows and tied at back in a chignon / [ΙΕΡΑΣ ΑΣΥΛΟΥ] ΑΣΚΑΛΩ[ΝΙΤΩΝ] Sacred and Inviolate of (the people of) Askalon", eagle standing to right, palm over left wing; monogram and dove to left, LΞΔ to right. Unpublished, but cf. Svoronos 1883 (year 52) and 1885 (year 55) = BMC Palestine 20, p.108; cf. Naville XVI, 1933, 1473 (year 66). 12.70g, 28mm, 12h.
Good Very Fine. Unique, unpublished and of considerable historical and numismatic interest. A marvellous example of Cleopatra's excessively rare 'Greek' silver coinage. Only three other tetradrachms issued by Cleopatra at Askalon are known to exist. That they are so exceedingly rare can only be explained if they were issued occasionally and in small numbers.
The dating of the Askalon tetradrachms of Cleopatra was for many years calculated incorrectly due to the extreme rarity of the coinage and the paucity of information available. BMC Palestine initially assigned the example with the date LNE (year fifty-five) to 30/29 BC, on the basis of an era assumed by Svoronos, following Feuardent, to have begun in 84 BC. These tetradrachms bearing Cleopatra's portrait would therefore have been struck when the queen, born in 69, would have been about forty years old. Svoronos, who saw the portrait as representing a woman of middle-age, clearly regarded this as appropriate. Indeed, Agnes Baldwin Brett (A New Cleopatra Tetradrachm of Ascalon, American Journal of Archaeology, vol. 41, 3) relates the anecdote that on the BM specimen, "Cleopatra so resembles an aged woman – children would call her a witch or a hag, with her beak of a nose and deeply wrinkled neck". However, the V. Adda collection example (formerly S. H. Chapman collection; presented in Naville XVI 1933 1473) displayed a year 66 date which required the redating of the series: if the coins had been dated from Svoronos' hypothetical era beginning 84 BC, the Naville specimen would have been struck some ten years after Cleopatra's death in c. 19 BC. Now reckoned from the year of autonomy of Askalon in 104/103 BC, the present piece dated to 41/40 BC must have been struck when Cleopatra was twenty-eight or twenty-nine years old.
Much has been written concerning the differences in appearance of the queen on her various coinage issues, and the apparent inconsistency in depicting both her age and beauty. Collectors often wonder at her plain appearance on the surviving coins both in her sole name and those issued jointly with Marc Antony, an appearance which seems at odds with her famous seduction of two of the most powerful men in history – first, Julius Caesar in 48/47 BC when she was twenty-one, then Marc Antony in 41/40 BC, the year this coin was struck. Surviving busts of Cleopatra certainly are more flattering than her coinage; the exaggeration of certain features on the coinage can often be explained by deliberate emphasis on attributes associated with strength and power, notably the angular jaw and chin, and distinctive Ptolemaic nose. Moreover, while Svoronos erroneously assumed that the Askalon coinage emanated from a mint under Cleopatra's direct control (an error subsequently perpetuated), in fact Askalon was an autonomous city under the protection of the Ptolemies, issuing coinage in their name only sporadically, apparently coinciding with important events and occasions (see A. Baldwin Brett, A New Cleopatra Tetradrachm of Ascalon, American Journal of Archaeology 41, 3, pp. 452-463). Cleopatra should therefore be expected to have had limited or no direct influence over her own image as portrayed on the coinage. Indeed, a further factor contributing to a stylised form of portrait may be found in the occasion for the striking of this issue, if it was produced in haste. Given the dating, the most likely events that would have occasioned its striking are either the conclusion of the alliance between Cleopatra and Antony in 41 BC, or more likely, the immediate threat posed to the city and its environs in 40 BC by the Parthian invasion of Syria led by Quintus Labienus and Pacorus. They had already forced the capitulation of Antioch, Phoenicia and Judaea, and were prevented from besieging Tyre only by the lack of a fleet; it would not be until the following year, 39, that Publius Ventidius Bassus would be dispatched east with 11 legions to drive back the invaders. It is possible therefore that this issue may have been produced in anticipation of anticipated warfare, as an appeal to Cleopatra for protection while advertising the city's loyalty to the Ptolemaic dynasty.
ROMA13, 428