View allAll Photos Tagged Indignation
Since 2011, Brazil has been undergoing profound transformations. These transformations have caused the country to go back a lot and only with the current government (of President Lula) are we reconquering many things. I'm not talking about perfections, but about a country that wants to show what it has come to. The current opposition has brought many difficulties, opening doors to treason to the homeland and, last week (between September 15 and 17), approved laws that shield parliamentarians from the crimes they have committed and amnesty those who plotted against democracy. And this Sunday, the population together with representatives of the left took to the streets of the main capitals to say enough is enough. It was a spontaneous indignation that brought thousands of people to the streets. The photos and videos capture moments of what happened in Copacabana, Rio de Janeiro on 09/21/2025. It was a message...
.
aisa How many more `mistakes' and SFI Secretary must do something to stop the critical outbursts.
crimes must the CPI(M) commit - against the party by SFI members and sympathisers on public.
Before the SFI opens its eyes? Facebook walls..
.
2.7.12 The answer my friend, is blowing in What methods has SFI deployed to manage this.
situation? Failing to answer the questions at hand that are.
the wind... being raised by so many people including its own cadres,.
the SFI leadership is deploying the age-old tactic of pointing.
For the past several weeks, there has been an intense debate fingers at an outside bogey - CPI(ML) and AISA! What are their.
weapons against CPI(ML) and AISA? They claim that CPI(M)'s.
in Left circles over the CPI(M)'s decision to support the former superior votes and `numbers' prove its correctness, whereas.
CPI(ML)'s lesser numbers and fewer elected representatives.
Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee in Presidential polls. render it `irrelevant.'.
.
From the Horse's Mouth The argument of `numbers' is a strange one for a Left.
party. Does this mean that Modi, Manmohan, Mamata etc.
The debate came to a head, and was brought home are vindicated by their superior numbers and votes, while the.
strongly to the SFI in JNU, when Prasenjit Bose, a senior Left's criticism of these forces is `irrelevant' and deserving of.
CPI(M) leader who was also a very prominent former SFI leader mockery and rejection because they remain far behind these.
from JNU, resigned from CPI(M) in protest over the party's forces in terms of votes? Is this not exactly the argument made.
decision to support Pranab Mukherjee. In his resignation letter, by right-wing forces against the Left?!.
in addition to critiquing the bankruptcy of the decision to support.
Pranab Mukherjee, he also observed, "The Party leadership Anyway, when it comes to numbers, will comrades in SFI,.
has committed one mistake after another since 2007 - face one simple fact? The CPI(M)'s relatively higher numbers,.
coercive land acquisition in West Bengal, the Nandigram of which they are so proud, are going to be used for the.
police firing, allowing the UPA government to approach the shameful cause of making Pranab Mukherjee President..
IAEA with the nuclear deal, giving a call for a non-Congress While the CPI(ML)'s numbers, on the streets and in the.
secular government in 2009 - and then accepted them in a Assembly, are all in one united voice, with all their strength,.
cavalier manner in Party conferences without fixing proper going to oppose and resist UPA's economic policies and.
responsibility and conducting rectification thereon." their leading representative, Pranab Mukherjee..
.
Subsequently, comments on Facebook by a series of With many SFI and CPI(M) members' indignation against.
former SFI leaders and even present generation SFI activists CPI(M)'s indefensible positions spilling out in the public arena,.
supported the questions raised by Com.Prasenjit. Some the SFI leadership is trying to stem the flood by rallying them.
examples are given below: all to declare that whatever the differences within, they are.
united in their contempt for and rejection of CPI(ML)..
One former JNUSU President from SFI, indicated "social.
democratic, right-wing deviations" within the CPI(M) and May we ask SFI comrades to reflect on one inescapable.
called Buddhadeb Bhattacharya a "thoroughly politically fact? In Left debate, positions taken by Left parties have never.
bankrupt" leader who was "revisionist", though he "might been understood merely in terms of individual leader's whims..
be a very smart neo-liberal leader." Rather, Left debate has generally acknowledged that there is.
some programmatic (theoretical) basis for most positions -.
Another Facebook comment questioned the idea that "all correct and wrong - taken by communist parties..
inner-party debate must be postponed and everyone must.
unite to defend the party's mistakes against outsiders" or that Take the series of questions that are being raised by.
"the party's `glorious history' absolves it of all present sins." voices close to CPI(M) in recent times, questions which many.
He also questioned how "an MM Mani can survive as a district SFI activists have also supported: Singur; Nandigram;.
secretary for 27 years, UNTIL public outcry.... Ashok Mitra was land acquisition and police firing on peasantry; timing.
publicly slandered by the party for his views and criticisms, all of withdrawal of support from UPA-I on Nuke Deal;.
of which were constructive. History proved Mr Mitra correct. misplaced calls for `Third Front Government' in 2009;.
No heads rolled in the Bengal organization after the elections, TP Chandrasekharan's murder; and support for Pranab.
expect the heads that rolled due to the electorate." Mukherjee as President..
.
One of the activists of the present SFI JNU Unit So many within the CPI(M) and SFI, as well as intellectuals,.
defended Comrade Prasenjit, saying, "You can't expect lakhs have hoped against hope that the CPI(M) would take.
of comrades to struggle, fight, defend the left movement, when principled Left positions on these issues. Instead, the.
the leadership refrains from doing the same." CPI(M) has ridiculed, rejected, punished, or bypassed the.
criticisms made by its own well-wishers, and has consistently.
Create a Bogey Outside to Deflect the Debate taken a right-wing deviationist position rather than a position.
Within that befits a Left party. It has even expelled and executed.
those who dared to leave the party in protest. Are there no.
But even as this heated debate among SFI's own ranks programmatic roots of repeated `mistakes' and `grave.
raged on Facebook, the SFI's official National/State and errors' by the CPI(M) - mistakes which its leadership.
campus leadership has till date remained silent on the continues to defend, snubbing the opinion of the best in its.
issue of support for Pranab and resignation and expulsion own ranks?.
of Prasenjit..
When the CPI(M) has been dashing the hopes of its.
Instead, SFI's main worry and fear seemed to be that own supporters, can it be denied that the CPI(ML) has.
their own rank and file might be forced to recognize that the consistently taken the positions that Left sympathizers.
questions SFI's own people are raising today, are the very.
same questions and criticisms which the CPI(ML) and P.T.O..
AISA had been consistently raising over a period of several.
years; questions which SFI had been rejecting as `ultra-left.
sectarianism and left-adventurism'! Not surprisingly, one.
SFI activist raised the frantic call on Facebook that the All India.
..
.
JNUSU .
.
upbolaing Tbe Leeac~ of Stuaents Strueele For Democrac~ Ana Justice .
Puhlil-i\h:ctinu .
The Ongoing Crisis In JNU And Our Response .
~ Prof. Arun Kumar, CESP, JNU .
~ Prof. Avijit Pathak, CSSS, JNU .
.
~ .
~ Prof. K.J. Mukherjee, CBT, JNU .
00 .
Amit Sengupta, Ex-President, JNUSU, Noted Journalist .
.
Tapti Mess 9.30pm .
.
Withdraw Sut~tntltnt Sera~ Proctorial Enquiry Ensure Minimum Wages And Rights Of .
.
Workers In JNU .
UMAN CHAIN .
.
In Defense Of Democracy And Justice .
6 M I ~.. .
SL La\vns 10.30am .
Examining Issues in the Ongoing Debates in the JNU Student Movement .
At this juncture in the JNU student movement, it is time to pause for a moment and assess the paradigm ofthe ongoing crisis. It is time to recall the values and ethos ofthe student movement which has been built in the course ofstruggles. The PRO ofthe university, in the name of'public relations', informs the public that students who insist on demanding minimum wages for workers on campus are a disruptive' influence, deterring contractors from taking up construction prujects in JNU. The students are seen by the authorities to be a blot on JNU's 'image'. But isn't the fact that the JNU Administration has for years and years been denying (and continues to deny) minimum wages to workers on campus a blot on JNU's socially sensitive image? .
Assessine 19 February : Bevond Binaries Today, a frenzy offear is being whipped up whereby some features ofthe February 19 protest are being presented as the greatest threat to JNU's democratic culture. Is this true? On the other hand, is it true that those same features represent all that is highest and best about JNU's culture of protest? It is time we tried to place the events of February 19 in perspective, beyond these binaries. The JNU student community would agree that some ofthe features ofthe February 19 protest were neither advisable nor a rnatter ofcelebration. Whatever our differences, it is undeniable that above all those particular expressions ofprotest gave the JNU Administration an excuse with which to hit back at the student movement. They are not a routine feature of the JNU student movement. Which is why it was fitting that the JNUSU, on behalf ofthe student community, has put the record straight and expressed regret for the above, and, contrary to false propaganda, aiJ the nine suspended students have communicated their faith in this resolution ofregret to the Administration. Regrettable though those events were, it is NOT TRUE that those features ofthe protest represent an impending apocalypse of anarchy, the worst threat to 'academic' order and peace, some sort of ' world turned upside down' in JNU where 'ultras' will be able to'insult authority' and 'destabilise academics'. .
Administration's Biases : Punishing Protests, Shielding Lumpenism In JNU, we all recalJ several instances where a section ofstudents have indulged in violence, with communal and anti-dt!mocratic intent -branding a person ofa particular religion to be 'terrorist' and prevent him from speaking, or to assault students who oppose a particular right-wing ideology. Or we've seen cases ofwanton lumpen attacks by certain elements against ordinary students or even a Hostel Warden who challenge them. In none of these cases has the Administration ever summarily suspended a sh&gle student. In fact, in the vast majority of these cases, no Enquiry has seriously been pursued, and no punishment meted out to the perpetrators. In contrast to such events, it is crystal clear that on February 19, what was uppermost on the mind ofthe protesting students was not some perverse wish to humiliate an individual or a figure ofauthority. What was uppermost for the students was their indignation at the plight of retrenched workers and daily wage workers deprived of legal minimum wage on JNUcampus. This indignation atAdministration's callousness regarding their legal duty towards these workers which created the impasse with the Registrar. Some of the expressions of this indignation were undesirable and have unnecessarily drawn attention away from the real issue. Recognising this, the JNUSU leadership has expressed regret, while upholding the core issue of workers' rights. .
Pl'() .
.
.
.
.
Who can stand before his indignation? and who can abide in the fierceness of his anger? his fury is poured out like fire, and the rocks are thrown down by him.
Film izlemek ister misiniz?! (Ya da dizi de olabilir!) www.FilmExpress.org 'da yeni bir dizi ya da film paylaşıldı!
Since 2011, Brazil has been undergoing profound transformations. These transformations have caused the country to go back a lot and only with the current government (of President Lula) are we reconquering many things. I'm not talking about perfections, but about a country that wants to show what it has come to. The current opposition has brought many difficulties, opening doors to treason to the homeland and, last week (between September 15 and 17), approved laws that shield parliamentarians from the crimes they have committed and amnesty those who plotted against democracy. And this Sunday, the population together with representatives of the left took to the streets of the main capitals to say enough is enough. It was a spontaneous indignation that brought thousands of people to the streets. The photos and videos capture moments of what happened in Copacabana, Rio de Janeiro on 09/21/2025. It was a message...
.
leadership has claimed that Praful Patel has assured that other airports will not be privatised; but the Ministry itself has said that no such assurance has been made. The double role was played out during the strike itself, when West Bengal CM Buddhadev Bhattacharya apologised to FICCI representatives for the airport strike that had inconvenienced their trip to Kolkata. West Bengals CPI(M) State Secretary Anil Biswas explained that the strike was necessary and right; but so was Buddhadevs position. After all, he said, how can a CM support a strike? So the division of labour is clear: the Unions will lead the workers in the strike, while the Chief Minister of a Left ruled State must uphold the status quo and discipline the workers! Of course, the Union leadership will be used to effectively discipline the workers! Recall that Buddhadev, in an interview in
., had declared: We have the strongest Unions
.. On the Iran issue, too, the CPI-CPI(M) spewed fire and brimstone warning the UPA not to vote with the US resolution, and demanding the recall of David Mulford. But a few days before the vote, they toned down their protest, and now, after the blatant and shameful vote on February 2, they have satisfied themselves with expressing indignation! Friends, a month from now, George Bush will visit India. We hope to see the Indian people, led by the Left, resisting his entry on Indian soil. But we also remind that demonstrating against Bush is only one aspect of the struggle against imperialism. If the Left fails to put up an effective resistance to Bushs Indian agents, to Manmohan Singh and the UPA Government, when they force the pro-imperialist policies of liberalisation onto Indian people, and when they they surrender Indias self-respect and freedom to US diktats, it will immeasurably weaken the struggle against imperialism. .
.